Triphis in the White Monastery: Reused Temple Blocks from Sohag

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Triphis in the White Monastery: Reused Temple Blocks from Sohag TRIPHIS IN THE WHITE MONASTERY: REUSED TEMPLE BLOCKS FROM SOHAG Abstract: Preliminary report on the Pharaonic and Graeco-Roman tem- ple blocks reused in the Church of St. Shenoute near Sohag. While some materials can be traced to sites further south, including Abydos, Nag‘ el-Mesheyekh and el-Mensha (Ptolemais), previously unrecorded inscriptions confirm that a group of limestone ceiling blocks derive from the temple of Repyt at nearby Atripe. This discovery may support Shenoute’s repeated claims to have destroyed this particular temple. «Almost everywhere in the Walls of the Monastery, in the Pavement that is before the Chancel, and in the great and beautiful pair of Stairs that lead up to the Sleeping-place of the Monks, are certain great Stones full of Cyphers and Hieroglyphick Figures placed not right; by which we may understand, that those that have put them there had no knowledge of this mysterious Tongue.»1 The inscribed Pharaonic spolia within the Coptic church of St. Shenoute near Sohag have fascinated many visitors2. The church was built c. 450 CE, 1 Johann WANSLEBEN, The Present State of Egypt, or: A New Relation of a Late Voyage into That Kingdom, 1678, p. 225. 2 PM V, p. 31; E. AMÉLINEAU, Les moines égyptiens, vie de Schnoudi, Paris 1889, p. 88; W.G. DE BOK, Matériaux pour servir à l’archéologie de l’Égypte chrétienne, St. Petersburg 1901, p. 44, 46, 48; W.M.F. PETRIE, Athribis, 1908, p. 11 and 14; ID., Ancient Egypt 2, 1915, p. 27; S. CLARKE, Christian Antiquities in the Nile Valley, Oxford 1912, p. 148; G. LEFEBVRE, Deir-el-Abiad, in: F. CABROL – H. LECLERCQ (eds.), Diction- naire d’archéologie chrétienne et de liturgie (DACL) IV 1, Paris 1920, col. 469-470; R. WEILL, Monuments égyptiens divers, XII: Monuments d’Amasis et de Hakoris au Deir el-Abiad, RT 36 (1914), p. 97-100; U. MONNERET DE VILLARD, Les couvents près de Sohag, II, Milan 1926, p. 123-124; H. KEES, Kulttopographische und mythologische Beiträge, ZÄS 64 (1931), p. 108-109; H. GAUTHIER, Un autel consacré à la déesse Mehit, ASAE 35 (1935), p. 207-212; S. SAUNERON, Villes et légendes d’Égypte XXXII – Le chaudron de Sohag: comment naît une légende, BIFAO 69 (1970), p. 54; P. VERNUS, Inscriptions de la Troisième Période Intermédiaire (II): Blocs du grand-prêtre d’Amon ˆIwpwt remployés dans le Deir-el-Abyad, BIFAO 75 (1975), p. 67-72; F.W. DEICHMANN, Zum Altägyptischen in der koptischen Baukunst, MDAIK 8 (1939), p. 36; ID., Die Spo- lien in der spätantiken Architektur (SAWM 1975, Band 6), Munich 1975, p. 56-60, Abb. 22-25; Cl. TRAUNECKER, Essai sur l’histoire de la XXIXe dynastie, BIFAO 79 (1979), p. 408, 422, 433; B. VERBEECK, art. Sohag, in: LÄ V, col. 1052-1054; ID., De Kloosterk- erken bij Sohag: De architekturale beslechting van een ideologisch conflict, Phœnix 27 (1981), p. 94-96; H.G. SEVERIN, Dayr Anba Shinudah: Architectural Sculpture, Coptic Encyclopedia III, New York 1991, p. 769; Y. EL-MASRY, More Recent Excavations at Athribis in Upper Egypt, MDAIK 57 (2001), p. 209; P. GROSSMANN, Christliche Architek- tur in Ägypten (HdO I, vol. 62), Leiden 2002, p. 171-172; O. PERDU, Inscriptions Saïtes I, Paris 2002, p. 82 (No. 13). Ancient Society 40, 197-213. doi: 10.2143/AS.40.0.2056256 © 2010 by Ancient Society. All rights reserved. 993524_AncSoc_40_07_Klotz.indd3524_AncSoc_40_07_Klotz.indd 119797 226/11/106/11/10 114:554:55 198 D. KLOTZ while Shenoute was archimandrite of a federation consisting of the so- called «White Monastery» and two other religious houses3. While some observers have speculated on the possible origins and religious significance of these pagan fragments, most of the reused blocks have remained unpub- lished. Beginning in 2007, the author conducted an epigraphic survey at the White Monastery in order to record all blocks presently visible in the church4. While a full publication of the Pharaonic blocks is still in progress, the present contribution highlights an object of particular importance for the history of the White Monastery and its region. Nearly a century ago, Petrie suggested that the primary building mate- rial for the church of St. Shenoute came from the temple of Repyt at Atripe5, the closest surviving stone monument, roughly three kilometers south of the White Monastery6. Although this hypothesis is quite reason- able, direct archaeological or textual evidence for such a provenance has not been published up to now7. Alternatively, Kees proposed that the 3 For a recent discussion of the construction date, see P. GROSSMANN, Zur Stiftung und Bauzeit der grossen Kirche des Schenuteklosters bei Suhaq (Oberägypten), ByzZ 101 (2002), p. 35-54. 4 The epigraphic mission at Sohag is part of the White Monastery Church Documenta- tion Project, directed by Bentley Layton, under the auspices of the Yale Monastic Archae- ology Project, Stephen J. Davis, executive director. Our research was given generous support by the Marilyn M. and William K. Simpson Endowment Fund for Egyptology at Yale University, under the direction of John C. Darnell. For project updates and detailed maps of the church, see www.yale.edu/egyptology/aw_white.htm. The author would like to thank Bentley Layton for the invitation to work at the White Monastery, and for pro- viding valuable suggestions on this project and the present article. 5 W.M.F. PETRIE, Athribis, p. 11 and 14; this suggestion is largely accepted today; see e.g. Y. EL-MASRY, MDAIK 57 (2001), p. 209; P. GROSSMANN, Christliche Architektur in Ägypten, p. 171 and 532; K. LEMBKE – C. FLUCK – G. VITTMANN, Ägyptens späte Blüte: Die Römer am Nil, Mainz 2004, p. 110; C.T. SCHROEDER, Monastic Bodies: Discipline and Salvation in Shenoute of Atripe, Philadelphia 2007, p. 95. 6 Several Pharaonic tombs in the western gebel overlooking the White and Red Monasteries are even closer than Atripe (B. OCKINGA, A Tomb from the Reign of Tutankha- mun at Akhmim [Reports of the Australian Centre for Egyptology 10], Warminster 1997; Y. EL-MASRY, Rock-Tombs from the Late Old Kingdom in the 9th Nome of Upper Egypt, SAK 36 [2007], p. 183-216), but they would not have provided blocks for the church. 7 G. WAGNER – V. RONDOT, ZPE 103 (1994), p. 250, n. 6, recently claimed: «Le texte de la Vie de Chénouda parle de la destruction et de la réutilisation des monuments antiques de la ville voisine et précise que cette question fut l’objet d’un désaccord entre le saint et les maçons, le premier préconisant le remploi contre l’avis des séconds.» How- ever, the relevant section of the Life of Shenoute (cf. N. LUBOMIERSKI, Die Vita Sinuthii [STAC 45], Tübingen 2007, p. 44-45, Episode 21, for the sources), says nothing about the local town or the origin of the blocks. The dispute between Shenoute and his stone- masons only appears in the expanded Arabic redaction (E. AMÉLINEAU, Monuments pour servir à l’histoire de l’Égypte chrétienne aux IVe et Ve siècles, p. 353-354), and is appar- ently an allusion to the proverbial cornerstone which the builders rejected. 993524_AncSoc_40_07_Klotz.indd3524_AncSoc_40_07_Klotz.indd 119898 226/11/106/11/10 114:554:55 TRIPHIS IN THE WHITE MONASTERY 199 church was built on the site of an earlier temple of the god Horus-ímy- snw.t, since a naos of the latter god currently resides within the east end of the long hall of the church, and tentatively identified modern Sohag with Pharaonic toponym Nsw (var. Sw), the cult center of this particular deity8. Although many Pharaonic blocks were reused in the church walls, the majority of objects from the White Monastery that have already been published are merely scattered on the ground throughout site, both inside and outside of the church. These monuments include: 1. Blocks from a funerary monument of the Generalissimo and High Priest of Amun, Iuput (Ywpt), from Abydos (Dynasty Twenty-Two)9 2. Granite altar of the goddess Mehyt,10 dedicated by Necho II and usurped by Psammetichus II (Dynasty Twenty-Six)11 3. Statue base of the general Neshor (Dynasty Twenty-Six)12 4. Granite naos of the god Horus-ímy-snw.t13, dedicated by Hakoris (Dynasty Twenty-Nine)14 8 H. KEES, ZÄS 64 (1931), p. 108. 9 P. VERNUS, BIFAO 75 (1975), p. 67-72; B. VERBEECK, Phœnix 27 (1981), p. 95, Fig. 22; C. MANASSA, The Late Egyptian Underworld: Sarcophagi and Related Texts from the Nectanebid Period, I (ÄAT 72), Wiesbaden 2008, p. 4, n. 21; two additional blocks have been found since the publication of Vernus. For the name and career of Ywpt see recently F. COLIN, Les Libyens en Égypte (XVe siècle a.C. – IIe siècle p.C.). Onomas- tique et histoire (Diss. Brussels, 1996), I, p. 36-37, 57-58; II, p. 5-7. 10 For the goddess Mehyt of Eastern Behedet (Nag‘ el-Mesheyekh, near Girga), see primarily S. CAUVILLE, L’hymne à Mehyt d’Edfou, BIFAO 82 (1982), p. 105-125; O. PERDU, Exemple de stèle archaïsante pour un prêtre modèle, RdE 52 (2001), p. 184, n. 5 and 8; for an overview of the site, see recently B. OCKINGA – Y. AL-MASRI, Two Ramesside Tombs at El-Mashayikh, I, Sydney 1988, p. 1-2. 11 H. GAUTHIER, ASAE 35 (1935), p. 207-212, only published the decoration of two sides of the altar based on photographs, but decoration is actually preserved on four sides; for the usurped cartouches on this altar, see recently R.B. GOZZOLI, The Statue BM EA 37891 and the Erasure of Necho II’s Names, JEA 86 (2000), p. 73, I.b3 (with further bibliography).
Recommended publications
  • Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Vol. 46, 1960
    THE JOURNAL OF Egyptian Archaeology VOLUME 46 DECEMBER I960 PUBLISHED BY THE JOURNAL OF Egyptian Archaeology VOLUME 46 PUBLISHED BY THE EGYPT EXPLORATION SOCIETY 2 HINDE STREET, MANCHESTER SQUARE, LONDON, W. 1 i960 CONTENTS PAGE EDITORIAL FOREWORD ............ I THE PHILADELPHIA-CAIRO STATUE OF OSORKON II . Bernard V. Bothmer . 3 THE INSCRIPTIONS ON THE PHILADELPHIA-CAIRO STATUE OF OSORKON II Helen K. Jacquet-Gordon . 12 MENEPTAH'S AID TO THE HITTITES . G. A. Wainwright ... 24 A SELECTION OF TUTHMOSIDE OSTRACA FROM DER EL- BAHRI W. C. Hayes ... 29 THE STATUETTE OF AN EGYPTIAN HARPER AND STRING- INSTRUMENTS IN EGYPTIAN STATUARY . .J. Leibovitch . -53 THE TITLE IN THE OLD KINGDOM . H. Goedicke .... 60 PAPYRUS LYTHGOE : A FRAGMENT OF A LITERARY TEXT OF THE MIDDLE KINGDOM FROM EL-LISHT . W. K. Simpson ... 65 A CANONICAL MASTER-DRAWING IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM E. Iversen . • 71 A BLOCK OF AMENOPHIS IV FROM ATHRIBIS . H. W. Fairman ... 80 SOME PRE-'AMARNAH SUN HYMNS . H. M. Stewart ... 83 NOTES ON PTOLEMAIC CHRONOLOGY . T. C. Skeat . -91 BIBLIOGRAPHY: GRAECO-ROMAN EGYPT: GREEK INSCRIP­ TIONS (1959) . • • • • • . P. M. Fraser ... 95 BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS: Was Osiris an ancient king subsequently deified?, by Sir Alan Gardiner, p. 104; A new fragment of the battlefield palette, by J. R. Harris, p. 104; The origin of black-topped red pottery, by A. J. Arkell, p. 105; The nature of the brick-work calculations in Kah. Pap. xxm, 24-40, by W. K. Simpson, p. 106; The supposed Year 21 of Akhenaten, by H. W. Fairman, p. 108; Ptolemy son of Pelops, by T. B.
    [Show full text]
  • (Ancient Athribis) in the Nile Delta 174 TOMASZ DERDA, ADAM ŁAJTAR
    INSTITUT DES CULTURES MÉDITERRANÉENNES ET ORIENTALES DE L’ACADÉMIE POLONAISE DES SCIENCES ÉTUDES et TRAVAUX XXVI 2013 TOMASZ DERDA, ADAM ŁAJTAR Inscriptions on Ceramics from Tell Atrib (Ancient Athribis) in the Nile Delta 174 TOMASZ DERDA, ADAM ŁAJTAR Archaeological excavations carried out from 1985 to 1995 by the Polish-Egyptian Mission on Kôm Sidi Yusuf in Tell Atrib (ancient Athribis, the capital of the tenth Lower Egyptian nome) brought to light a considerable part of the town dating from the Hellenistic and Roman periods.1 Within the remains of mud-brick architecture, predominantly of domestic and industrial character, large quantities of artifacts were discovered, among them a rich and interesting collection of terracotta fi gurines,2 and a signifi cant amount of pottery, both locally produced and imported.3 Inscribed fi nds, excluding stamped amphora handles of the Hellenistic and Early Roman periods,4 were rare. Besides hieroglyphic inscriptions on loose stone blocks,5 shabtis6 and other small objects,7 and a Greek graffi to on a piece of limestone – perhaps a signature of an artist or a legend to a sculptured monument8 – only graffi ti and dipinti on ceramic surfaces can be mentioned. This article aims to present these sparse fi nds.9 * The authors wish to thank Professor Karol Myśliwiec, the Director of the Polish-Egyptian Mission at Tell Atrib, for his permission to study and publish this material. We thank Anna Południkiewicz, Agata Ulanowska, Tomasz Górecki, Grzegorz Majcherek, and Henryk Meyza for information on various aspects of the fi nds, especially the ceramological data. Ms. Południkiewicz also provided us with information about the archaeological contexts and supplied a large part of the illustrations used in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Inscriptions from the Palace of Amenhotep III William C
    Inscriptions from the Palace of Amenhotep III William C. Hayes Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2. (Apr., 1951), pp. 82-112. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-2968%28195104%2910%3A2%3C82%3AIFTPOA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-7 Journal of Near Eastern Studies is currently published by The University of Chicago Press. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/ucpress.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Thu Oct 25 06:12:06 2007 INSCRIPTIONS FROhI THE PALACE OF AMENHOTEP I11 WILLIAM C.
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptian Temples
    Originalveröffentlichung in: Christina Riggs (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Egypt, Oxford 2012, S. 362-382 CHAPTER 22 EGYPTIAN TEMPLES MARTINA MINAS-NERPEL From the beginning of their rule in Egypt, the Ptolemies initiated a gigantic temple con­ struction and decoration programme, which the Roman emperors continued well into the second century ce. Temples were still decorated on a much smaller scale into the third and the beginning of the fourth centuries. The last known cartouche of a Roman emperor in a temple was inscribed under Maximinus Daia (305-13 ce) on blocks belonging to the temple of Horus at Tahta (Holbl 2000: 45 n. 177; 114, fig. 157). Otherwise, the latest evidence comes from Esna (Sauneron 1975:65-6, no. 495; 84-7, no. 503), where the temple of Khnum was still being decorated under Decius (249-51 ce). Stelae inscribed in hieroglyphs continued to be set up in Egyptian temples, for example in the Bucheum at Armant, of which the latest is dated to 340, the fifty-seventh year of the era of Diocletian (Holbl 2000:45 n. 178; Goldbrun- ner 2004:78-9,302). The temple of Isis at Philae, where hieroglyphs were carved in the tem­ ple of Harendotes as late as 394 (Winter 1982:1023), was the last to be kept open, being closed down under Justinian between 535 and 537 (Winter 1982:1026), when it was converted to a church (Dijkstra 2008). The Hellenistic and Roman periods of Egypt are often subsumed under the term ‘Graeco- Roman Egypt’. In his examination of Egyptian society under Ptolemaic and Roman rule, Naphtali Lewis (1970) correctly pointed out that this phrase should not be used to imply con­ tinuity between the two eras, since the changes in the governmental structure, social pat­ terns and politics, administration, and the economy were so fundamental in Roman times as to render the term misleading.
    [Show full text]
  • Romano-Byzantine Baths of Egypt, the Birth and Spread of a Little-Known Regional Model Thibaud Fournet, Bérangère Redon
    Romano-Byzantine baths of Egypt, the birth and spread of a little-known regional model Thibaud Fournet, Bérangère Redon To cite this version: Thibaud Fournet, Bérangère Redon. Romano-Byzantine baths of Egypt, the birth and spread of a little-known regional model. Bérangère Redon. Collective baths in Egypt 2. New discoveries and perspectives, Presses de l’IFAO, pp.279-322, 2017, 9782724706963. hal-01758079 HAL Id: hal-01758079 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01758079 Submitted on 7 Dec 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Collective Baths in Egypt 2 25New siècles Discoveries de bainand Perspectives collectif en Orient Proche-Orient, Égypte et péninsule Arabique T H E R M A E Edited by AuteurBérangère Redon Specimen Institut français d’archéologie orientale Études urbaines 10 – 2017 Dans la même collection : Marie-Françoise Boussac, Sylvie Denoix, Thibaud Fournet et Bérangère Redon (éds.), 25 siècles de bain collectif en Orient. Proche-Orient, Égypte et péninsule Arabique, 2014. Julien Loiseau, Reconstruire la Maison du sultan (2 vol.), 2010. Marie-Françoise Boussac, Thibaud Fournet et Bérangère Redon, Le bain collectif en Égypte, 2009. István Ormos, Max Herz Pasha, (2 vol.), 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Coptic Burial Wrapping
    chapter 11 Coptic Burial Wrapping Jonathan P. Elias “Bandages of fine linen cloth, smeared over with gum”—how frequent is the refrain and how quintessentially Egyptian. However, the Herodotean account of Egyptian embalming (The Persian Wars Book II, 86) is quoted so often as to almost disguise its own significance. Of the three embalming standards Herodotus addresses, only his “most perfect” one includes wrapping as part of the service. Furthermore, Herodotus leaves us with the distinct impression that wrapping is as basic as evisceration and embalming to really approaching the “manner” of Osiris and that only by providing a decent wrapping job will one have a shot at practical preservation and ritual conquest of oblivion.1 To the extent that this properly represents an ongoing ancient Egyptian tradition and not just one current around 440 BCE, what effect would such ideas have on funerary wrapping in the Christian era and at Naga ed-Deir in particular?2 In speaking about Christian funerary behavior, there is a tendency to refer to earlier traditions as “pagan” as if there had been a clean break with all ancient rites once monotheism was adopted. The notion of a “clean break” associated with new religious sensibilities is misleading and in view of the difficulty in recognizing the practices of “Early Christianity” archaeologically inside Egypt, it will be preferable to discuss wrapping methods at Naga ed-Deir in a stylis- tic or methodological way, and simply say “Coptic Egyptian” when referring to wrapped bodies prepared under the Byzantine hegemony.3 In view of the complex array of wrapping methods, there is clearly a need to understand 1 Herodotus in the original passage respects Osiris by not naming him.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen J. Davis Curriculum Vitae, P
    Stephen J. Davis curriculum vitae, p. 1 STEPHEN J. DAVIS Yale University Yale University Pierson College Department of Religious Studies 261 Park Street 451 College Street New Haven, CT 06511 New Haven, CT 06511 Phone: 203-432-1298 Email: [email protected] Fax: 203-432-7844 EDUCATION: Yale University -- M.A. (1993), M.Phil. (1995), Ph.D. (1998), Religious Studies (Ancient Christianity) Dissertation: “The Cult of Saint Thecla, Apostle and Protomartyr: A Tradition of Women’s Piety in Late Antiquity” Duke University, The Divinity School -- M.Div., summa cum laude (1992) Princeton University -- A.B., English Literature (and Hellenic Studies), cum laude (1988) Senior Thesis: “Visions of History: The Poetry of W. B. Yeats and C. P. Cavafy” EMPLOYMENT HISTORY/TEACHING EXPERIENCE: Professor of Religious Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT (2008– ) Affiliate faculty member in the Departments of History and Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, the Councils on Archaeological Studies and Middle East Studies, and the Programs in Humanities, Hellenic Studies, and Medieval Studies. Senior Research Fellow at the MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies. Associate Professor of Religious Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT (2005–08) Assistant Professor of Religious Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT (2002–05) Professor of New Testament and Early Church History, Evangelical Theological Seminary in Cairo (ETSC), Cairo, Egypt (1998–2002, visiting spring 2005). ETSC is the official Arabic-language seminary of the Coptic Evangelical
    [Show full text]
  • The Earliest Dated Monument of Amasis and the End of the Reign of Apries Author(S): Anthony Leahy Source: the Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Vol
    The Earliest Dated Monument of Amasis and the End of the Reign of Apries Author(s): Anthony Leahy Source: The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Vol. 74 (1988), pp. 183-199 Published by: Sage Publications, Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3821755 Accessed: 05-03-2018 18:54 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Sage Publications, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology This content downloaded from 128.148.254.57 on Mon, 05 Mar 2018 18:54:37 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms (I83) JEA 74 THE EARLIEST DATED MONUMENT OF AMASIS AND THE END OF THE REIGN OF APRIES By ANTHONY LEAHY Publication of a donation stela BM 952 (year one of Amasis) followed by analysis of the sources for the civil war with Apries (P. BM 10113, Elephantine stela, cuneiform tablet BM 33041, Herodotus, Diodorus Siculus). P. BM 101 13 and BM 952 together show that Apries was still recognized at Thebes in October, 570, over eight months after the first monument dated by Amasis. It is argued that Apries was in Egypt for the whole of that period and only went abroad after his defeat at 'Immw/Momemphis.
    [Show full text]
  • Two “Armed” Terracottas from Athribis
    Two “armed” terracottas from Athribis Hanna Szymańska Institute of Mediterranean and Oriental Cultures, Polish Academy of Sciences To an expert and an admirer of the coroplastic arts from Egypt Terracotta figurines produced in antiquity in ancient Athribis in the Nile Delta (modern district of Tell Atrib in the Egyptian town of Benha) are commendable for their mostly excellent execution, as well as varied subject matter and frequently unique character. Even more importantly, however, the Athribian terracotta assemblage is well stratified. The finds come from regular excavations where strata were dated mainly by coins (Tell Atrib 2009) and pottery finds, the latter including many stamped amphora handles (Tell Atrib 2000). The fieldwork was carried out in 1985–1995 and 1998–1999 by a Polish-Egyptian mission from the PCMA, headed first by Karol Myśliwiec and subsequently by the present author (for a list of publications, see Tell Atrib 2009: 9–11). The figurines have been dated to a period from the end of the 4th century BC through the Byzantine age. Their astonishing variety reflects foremost the Greek ten- dency to choose themes not only from the sphere of cult, but also from everyday life. Athribian craftsmen were masters at depicting characteristic human types and processing individual traits into extremely realistic figurines, such as dwarfs and aged drunkards, for example. They imitated models from other craft centers, especially Alexandria, but they were not above original creations which themselves served as models not only for other terracottas, but also perhaps for statuary, as was the case with the Old Drunken Woman (Szymańska 1994; Szymańska 2005: 75–77, Cat.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Red Monastery Church Elizabeth S. Bolman, Director of the USAID/ARCE Red Monastery Church Conservation Pr
    An Introduction to the Red Monastery Church Elizabeth S. Bolman, Director of the USAID/ARCE Red Monastery Church Conservation Project [An abridged version of the Introduction to The Red Monastery Church: Beauty and Asceticism in Upper Egypt, edited by Elizabeth S. Bolman. Yale University Press and the American Research Center in Egypt, 2016, xx-xxxvi. For scholarly references for the information included here, please see the Introduction to the book.] The Red Monastery Church is an extraordinary monument, a beautiful materialization of asceticism and authority. A community of Christian men made the decision a millennium and a half ago to build a large church, thus asserting the social centrality of their ascetic establishment at the Red Monastery. A significant part of that original monument and some of its major renovations still survive in astonishingly good condition, although the church has until very recently not received the renown that is its due. It was designed as a triconch basilica: a building with a rectangular nave, divided into three aisles by two rows of columns, leading to a three- lobed sanctuary. The nave, where the congregation attended religious services, is separated from the sanctuary, which was reserved for priests, by a raised platform with a screen and an interior façade wall. The basic model for the Red Monastery Church was a larger church built a few decades earlier at the nearby White Monastery. Though the trefoil design was popular in the late Roman world, no other example survives in such an excellent state of preservation. Additionally, the early Byzantine decoration of the sanctuary is almost intact and includes rich architectural sculpture, imposing figural compositions, and extensive ornamental paintings.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Deterioration and Proposed Restoration of the Limestone, White Monastery—Sohag, Egypt
    Open Journal of Geology, 2017, 7, 1287-1302 http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojg ISSN Online: 2161-7589 ISSN Print: 2161-7570 Evaluation of Deterioration and Proposed Restoration of the Limestone, White Monastery—Sohag, Egypt Abd-Elkareem E. Ahmed1*, Ahmed O. Mashaly2, Basel N. Shalaby2, Mohamed A. Rashwan2 1Conservation Department, Faculty of Archaeology, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt 2Geology Department, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt How to cite this paper: Ahmed, A.-E.E., Abstract Mashaly, A.O., Shalaby, B.N. and Rashwan, M.A. (2017) Evaluation of Deterioration and By studying the phenomena of limestone built from the White Monastery in Proposed Restoration of the Limestone, White Sohag Governorate damage where this study discusses the results of the ana- Monastery—Sohag, Egypt. Open Journal of lyzes and the study’s petrographic limestone, we can study and discuss what Geology, 7, 1287-1302. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2017.79085 has been done to analyze X-ray diffraction and X-ray flourecence, and by scan- ning electron microscope in order to determine the cause of the damage and Received: July 31, 2017 to study the properties of limestone to choose the most appropriate treatment Accepted: August 29, 2017 methods especially the internal structure affected by the environmental condi- Published: September 1, 2017 tions surrounding the private and increasing ground water levels along with Copyright © 2017 by authors and the use of the most appropriate ways to buffer water to conserve the limestone Scientific Research Publishing Inc. of the environmental factors that damage it. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International Keywords License (CC BY 4.0).
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt Under Roman Rule: the Legacy of Ancient Egypt I ROBERT K
    THE CAMBRIDGE HISTORY OF EGYPT VOLUME I Islamic Egypt, 640- I 5 I 7 EDITED BY CARL F. PETRY CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE CONTENTS The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 IRP, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge, CB2 2Ru, United Kingdom http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY roorr-42rr, USA http://www.cup.org ro Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3 r66, Australia © Cambridge University Press r998 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published r998 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge List of illustrations to chapter I 3 ix List of contributors x Typeset in Sabon 9.5/r2 pt [CE] Preface xm A cataloguerecord for this book is available from the British Library Note on transliteration xv Maps xvi ISBN o 5 2r 4 7r 3 7 o hardback r Egypt under Roman rule: the legacy of Ancient Egypt I ROBERT K. RITNER 2 Egypt on the eve of the Muslim conquest 34 WALTER E. KAEGI 3 Egypt as a province in the Islamic caliphate, 641-868 62 HUGH KENNEDY 4 Autonomous Egypt from Ibn Tuliin to Kafiir, 868-969 86 THIERRY BIANQUIS 5 The Isma'ili Da'wa and the Fatimid caliphate I20 PAUL E. WALKER 6 The Fatimid state, 969-rr7r IJ I PAULA A.
    [Show full text]