Recent Progress and Future Prospects for Magnetoresistive Ram Technology
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
RECENT PROGRESS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS FOR MAGNETORESISTIVE RAM TECHNOLOGY Jon Slaughter Everspin Technologies, Inc Chandler, Arizona USA Center for Embedded Systems IAB Meeting Chandler, Arizona, 22 Jan 2013 Outline • MRAM overview • Field-switched MRAM: “Classical Spintronics” • Spin-torque MRAM: Spin-Torque-Transfer Spintronics • Critical device properties and effect of materials • Status: Fully-functional 64Mb, DDR3 ST-MRAM • Summary Everspin – The MRAM Company • MRAM - Magnetic Random Access Memory • Fastest non-volatile memory with unlimited endurance • Only company to have commercialized MRAM • Founded 2008, 100%+ annual revenue growth • Fundamental & essential MRAM IP • 200+ US patents granted, 600+ WW patents & applications • Backed by top-tier VC firms MRAM - Technology Comparison Toggle Write Spin-Torque Write Write with magnetic fields from Write with spin polarized current current-carrying lines. passing through the MTJ. High-performance, nonvolatile, Lower write current enables unlimited endurance higher memory density AlOx / NiFe-based MTJ MgO / CoFeB-based MTJ In volume production 64Mb sampling to customers 4 Everspin Toggle MRAM Attributes Parameter Capability Non-volatile capability • Data retention >20 years Performance • Symmetric read/write – 35ns Endurance • Unlimited cycling endurance • Easily integrates in manufacturing back-end CMOS integration • Compatible with embedded designs • No impact on CMOS device performance Temperature range, • -40ºC < T < 150ºC operation demonstrated reliability • Intrinsic reliability > 20 years lifetime at 125ºC • MRAM cell radiation tolerant Soft error immunity • Soft error rate from alpha radiation too low to measure (<0.1 FIT/Mb) Environmentally • No battery, RoHS compliant, low power friendly 5 MRAM Market Segments MRAM benefits Storage & Server Better Reliability Fast Power Off/On • RAID, NAS, SAN & DAS Storage No Batteries/Caps • Rack & Blade Servers Lower TCO Energy & Infrastructure Better Reliability Industrial Temp Single-Board Computer, Routers, POS, Gaming No Batteries/Caps SmartGrid, SmartMeter, Solar, Wind … Lower TCO Automotive and Transportation Better Reliability Automotive Temp • Power Train, Brakes, Safety, Data Logging Endurance • MultiMedia, Navigation, Camera, Black Box Lower TCO 6 Current MRAM products All Based on Toggle Switching 16-bit I/O 48-BGA Part Number Density Configuration • x8 Asynchronous parallel I/O MR4A16B 16Mb 1Mx16 • x16 Asynchronous parallel I/O MR2A16A 4Mb 256Kx16 • x8 Asynchronous parallel 1.8V I/O MR0A16A 1Mb 64Kx16 44-TSOPII, 54-TSOP 8-bit I/O • x8 Asynchronous parallel I/O Part Number Density Configuration • x16 Asynchronous parallel I/O MR4A08B 16Mb 2Mx8 8-DFN MR2A08A 4Mb 512Kx8 • SPI-compatible serial I/O MR0A08B 1Mb 128Kx8 • 40 MHz; No write delay MR256A08B 256Kb 32kX8 MR0D08B 1Mb 128KX8, 1.8v I/O 32-SOIC MR256D08 256Kb 32KbX8, 1.8v I/O • x8 Asynchronous parallel I/O SPI I/O Extended -40 to +105 ºC Part Number Density Configuration Automotive -40 to +125 ºC MR25H40 4Mb 512Kx8 MR25H10 1Mb 128Kx8 Commercial 0 to +70 ºC MR25H256 256Kb 32Kx8 Industrial -40 to +85 ºC 7 Tunneling Magnetoresistance The tunneling is spin-dependent: spin-up and spin-down have different probabilities. Low R DV EF First MTJ material with d band MR>10%: AlOx based in 1995 s band • Miyazaki & Tezuka, JMMM 139 • Moodera, et al. PRL 74 V First MTJ material with MR~200% in 2004 • Parkin, et al., Nat. Mat. 10.1038 High R • Yuasa, et al., Nat. Mat. 10.1038 DV EF d band s band MR= DR/Rlow MR~ 2P1P2/(1-P1 P2) 8 Discovery to Commercial Application: TMR • Magnetic Tunnel Junctions with high Tunneling Magnetoresistance in 1995* led to first commercial MRAM in 2006+ • Tunneling resistance can be matched to CMOS transistors • Also used in HDD sensors *J.S. Moodera, et al., PRL 74, 1995 *T. Miyazaki and N. Tezuka, JMMM 139, 1995 + Freescale/Everspin 4Mb Toggle MRAM Discovery to Commercial Application: STT • Two major developments spurred the second wave of MRAM development 1. Spin-torque demonstrations • M. Tsoi, et al. 1998 and J.A. Katine, et al. 2000 2. MTJ material with MR~200% • Parkin, et al. and Yuasa, et al. 2004 • Technology Demonstrations Include • M. Hosomi, et al., IEDM 2005 • R. Beach, et al. and T. Kishi, et al., IEDM 2008 • S. Chung, et al. and D. C. Worledge, et al., IEDM 2010 • W. Kim, et al., IEDM 2011 • First Product Sampling: Everspin 64Mb 2012 Recent Progress in Magnetic Switching • MgO/CoFeB-based MTJs with perpendicular magnetization • S. Ikeda et al., (2010) • D.C. Worledge, et al., (2011) • Very active area of R&D worldwide • Other recent discoveries show potential for continued rapid improvement • Voltage-controlled interface anisotropy • Voltage-controlled magnetism • Spin Hall effect Outline • MRAM overview • Field-switched MRAM: “Classical Spintronics” • Spin-torque MRAM: Spin-Torque-Transfer Spintronics • Critical device properties and effect of materials • Status: Fully-functional 64Mb, DDR3 ST-MRAM • Summary 1 T-1 MTJ MRAM Write Operation Write Mode Easy Axis Field IEasy Free Layer Tunnel Barrier Fixed Layer Hard Axis Field IHard Isolation Transistor “OFF” 13 Figure 4 MTJ bits i1 i2 14 Conventional MRAM Bit Selection • Bit disturb margin • Need many sigma separation between unselected and ½-selected distributions • All bits along selected current lines have reduced energy barrier during programming • Susceptible to disturb from thermal agitation 15 Conventional Operating Region Theoretical Experimental from 256k 1.0 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Min. 3.4 0 0 c c 3.5 Fail bits 0.5 / H / H 3.6 3.7 easy easy measurement 3.8 H H simulation operating region ibit 3.9 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.0 idigit H / H 0 hard c • Challenge: Programming window sits between 2 distributions. • Challenge: Thermal activation shrinks the window. 16 Toggle Write Operation Low-R High-R State H1 H1 + H2 H2 State I2 I2 pinned pinned I 1 I1 MTJ I1 I2 Advantages: Eliminates disturb - Large operating window US Patent 6,545,906, Savtchenko et al. (2003) 17 Toggle-Bit Selection • High bit disturb margin • All bits along ½-selected current lines have increased energy barrier during programming 18 Toggle-bit Array Characteristics Switching map for a 4Mb Toggle MRAM circuit Saturation Errors H2 IV I Lower Hsat leads to errors at high write currents toggling • Sets upper bound of operating region No disturb 100% toggle • Not a half-select problem No disturb Cause • Top and bottom moments can switch bit bit i No disturb i places when free SAF is close to saturation No switch No disturb Htog ~ sqrt(Hsat), so operation region toggling opens up with increasing Hsat III II idigit 19 Outline • MRAM overview • Field-switched MRAM: “Classical Spintronics” • Spin-torque MRAM: Spin-Torque-Transfer Spintronics • Critical device properties and effect of materials • Status: Fully-functional 64Mb, DDR3 ST-MRAM • Summary Spin-Torque MRAM Use spin momentum from current to change direction of S, m. 5500 Rmax 5000 DS ) Ω ( 4500 Free 4000 layer m 3500 MR Tunnel 3000 Resistance Resistance Rmin Barrier 2500 2000 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 Fixed Current (mA) Layer Need low resistance tunnel barrier to pass the required large DS 2 Torque current density, Jc > 1 MA/cm Dt 21 Desired Scaling of Switching Current • Today: Reduce Jc for reliability and smaller transistors • Continued scaling: maintain energy barrier and manage distributions while reducing Jc 1000 I (array) Scaling should maintain or sw reduce Jc, then: IC (MTJ) • IC scales favorably to 100 transistor current Id-sat (transistor) Maintain Eb/kT for non- volatility and control Main Challenge: Current (uA) Current 10 distributions Reduce Isw (Jc) Maintain Distributions Maintain Energy Barrier 1 0 20 40 60 80 100 Technology Node (nm) 2 Ic calculated for Jc=2MA/cm 22 IC scaling with bit size 10000 J RA Ic Area I c C R Jc constant over range of bit sizes 120nm wide •Data points = Ic for A) different bit sizes m 1000 ( C I 50nm wide •Bit width: 120nm →50nm •Aspect ratio: 1.7 → 3.5 But need to maintain energy barrier for non- 100 volatility! 0.1 1 10 Bit resistance R (kW) 23 Paths to lower Ic • For in-plane magnetization: 2e MVs IHMC( k 2 s ) Compensate for thin- Increase spin- film demagnetization torque efficiency field with PMA η Lower damping () Lower Ms and/or free layer material thinner free layer (Eb limited) See for example, Katine & Fullerton, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 320 (2008) 1217–1226 24 Paths to lower Ic • For in-plane magnetization: 2e MVs IHMC( k 2 s ) Compensate for thin- Increase spin- film demagnetization torque efficiency field with PMA η Lower damping () Lower Ms and/or free layer material thinner free layer (Eb limited) 25 Ic with Perpendicular Magnetization Bit shape Thin-film demagnetization term 2e MV in plane I H 2Ms H 2) c k Material with large perpendicular anisotropy can offset the demag. field • Two cases: 1. H < 4Ms , in-plane with perpendicular assist • Energy barrier to reversal dominated by bit shape 2. H > 4Ms , perpendicular magnetization • Energy barrier to reversal dominated by H • Ic ~ Energy Barrier 26 Reduced In-Plane Ic with Perpendicular Assist Large demagnetization Magnetic Modeling Results Bit shape term dominates I c H = 0 kOe 1.8 2e MV in plane 1.6 Ic Hk 2Ms H 2) H = 2 kOe 1.4 1.2 Material with large perpendicular 1 anisotropy can offset the demag. field H = 4 kOe 0.8 Ic (mA) Ic 0.6 Moment must tilt out of plane during (normalized) Ic H = 6 kOe switching, but energy used to overcome 0.4 demag. field is wasted 0.2 0 30 60 90 120