Interoperability: a Continuing Challenge in Coalition Air Operations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Interoperability: a Continuing Challenge in Coalition Air Operations INTEROPERABILITY A CONTINUING CHALLENGE IN COALITION AIR OPERATIONS MYRON HURA GARY McLEOD ERIC LARSON JAMES SCHNEIDER DANIEL GONZALES DAN NORTON JODY JACOBS KEVIN O’CONNELL WILLIAM LITTLE RICHARD MESIC LEWIS JAMISON R Project AIR FORCE The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-96-C-0001. Further information may be obtained from the Strategic Planning Division, Directorate of Plans, Hq USAF. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Interoperability of U.S. and NATO allies’ air forces : focus on C3ISR / Myron Hura ... [et al.]. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. “MR-1235-AF.” ISBN 0-8330-2912-6 1. United States. Air Force. 2. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. 3. Air Forces—Europe. 4. Command and control systems. 5. Electronic intelligence. 6. Aerial reconnaissance. 7. Space surveillance. 8. Internetworking (Telecommunication) I. Hura, Myron, 1943– UG633 .I58 2000 358.4'0094—dc21 00-064025 RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. Cover designed by Tanya Maiboroda © Copyright 2000 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2000 by RAND 1700 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/ To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Internet: [email protected] PREFACE This report describes research that was conducted (1) to help the U.S. Air Force identify potential interoperability problems that may arise in NATO Alliance operations or in U.S. coalition operations with NATO allies over the next decade; and (2) to suggest nonmateriel and technology-based solution directions to mitigate identified shortfalls. The focus of the research is on command, control, communications, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C3ISR) systems and on out-of-NATO-area operations. The research was sponsored by the Air Force Director of Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (USAF/XOI), the Air Force Director of Command and Control (USAF/XOC), and the comman- der of the Aerospace Command, Control, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Center (AC2ISR/CC). The research was per- formed within the Aerospace Force Development program of Project AIR FORCE (PAF), and it builds on two recent PAF study projects: “Investment Guidelines for Information Operations—Focus on ISR” and “Developing Future Integrated C2 and ISR Capabilities.” This report should be of interest to policymakers, planners, and pro- gram managers involved in interoperability issues and programs of U.S. and NATO allies’ air forces. It should also be of interest to plan- ners and operational commanders involved in the employment of coalition C3ISR and combat capabilities. iii iv Interoperability: A Continuing Challenge Project AIR FORCE Project AIR FORCE, a division of RAND, is the Air Force federally funded research and development center (FFRDC) for studies and analysis. It provides the Air Force with independent analyses of pol- icy alternatives affecting the development, employment, combat readiness, and support of current and future aerospace forces. Research is performed in four programs: Aerospace Force De- velopment; Manpower, Personnel, and Training; Resource Manage- ment; and Strategy and Doctrine. CONTENTS Preface ......................................... iii Figures ......................................... ix Tables.......................................... xi Summary ....................................... xiii Acknowledgments................................. xxiii Acronyms ....................................... xxvii Chapter One INTRODUCTION .............................. 1 Study Objective and Scope ....................... 1 Background .................................. 2 Study Approach ............................... 3 Structure of the Report .......................... 4 Chapter Two A BROAD DEFINITION OF INTEROPERABILITY ....... 7 Strategic Perspectives ........................... 8 Operational and Tactical Perspectives ............... 12 Technological Perspective ........................ 13 Summary .................................... 15 Chapter Three INTEROPERABILITY CHALLENGES IN RECENT COALITION OPERATIONS .................... 17 Interoperability Lessons Learned ................... 17 v vi Interoperability: A Continuing Challenge Key Interoperability Challenges and Workarounds ...... 19 Broader Lessons for Interoperability Planning ......... 20 Chapter Four NEW TRENDS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE INTEROPERABILITY ........................ 23 The International Security Environment ............. 23 Changes in NATO’s Security Environment .......... 24 New Missions for NATO ........................ 27 The Budgetary and Programmatic Environment ........ 27 Tighter Defense Budgets ....................... 27 The Political and Economic Aspects of Defense Consolidation ............................. 28 Concurrent Development and Introduction of New NATO Capabilities .......................... 28 A Potentially Widening Gap in U.S.-NATO Capabilities ... 29 Precision Strike .............................. 32 Network-Centric Collaborative Force-Level and Unit- Level Operations ........................... 32 Dynamic Assessment, Planning, and Execution ...... 33 Defence Capabilities Initiative ................... 33 Case Studies .................................. 34 Chapter Five COMMAND AND CONTROL ...................... 37 Strategic Level................................. 39 Current Command Constructs ................... 40 Evolving Command Constructs .................. 42 Operational and Tactical Levels .................... 43 Technological Level ............................ 45 Differing Objectives, Practices, and Procedures ...... 46 Dynamic Planning ............................ 49 Common Operational Picture ................... 50 Standards .................................. 50 Observations and Suggested Actions ................ 51 Chapter Six SPACE DEVELOPMENTS ......................... 55 The Broader Context for Space Cooperation ........... 56 Motives and Methods for Space Cooperation .......... 57 European Space Programs ........................ 61 French Space Program ......................... 62 Contents vii Italian Space Program ......................... 65 WEU Satellite Centre .......................... 67 Galileo Program .............................. 70 European Space-Based Radar Programs ............ 72 Observations and Suggested Actions ................ 74 Chapter Seven AIR SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL ................ 77 Interoperability Challenges ....................... 80 Systems .................................... 80 Missions and Operations ....................... 83 Political Concerns ............................ 85 Training ................................... 85 Future Prospects ............................. 86 Mechanisms to Foster Interoperability .............. 88 Cost Implications .............................. 90 Observations and Suggested Actions ................ 92 Chapter Eight GROUND SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL ........... 95 AGS Requirements ............................. 98 AGS Concept Definition ......................... 99 Other Means to Ensure Interoperability .............. 101 Observations and Suggested Actions ................ 104 Chapter Nine TACTICAL DATA LINKS ......................... 107 TADIL J, JTIDS, and Link 16 ....................... 108 Link 16 Terminology ............................ 110 Summary of MIDS Case Study ..................... 114 Why MIDS? ................................. 116 Observations ................................ 117 Suggested Actions ............................ 119 Chapter Ten FIGHTERS AND WEAPONS ....................... 123 Cooperative Fighter Development .................. 124 Allied Capabilities .............................. 127 Allied Air-Superiority Capabilities ................ 127 Allied Precision Strike Capabilities ................ 128 Allied SEAD Capabilities ....................... 133 U.S. Capabilities ............................... 134 viii Interoperability: A Continuing Challenge Observations.................................. 136 Suggested Actions .............................. 138 Chapter Eleven ILLUSTRATIVE MILITARY VALUE .................. 141 Peacekeeping Operations ........................ 141 Force Protection ............................... 144 Against Conventional Aircraft ................... 145 Against Cruise Missiles ........................ 147 Against Theater Ballistic Missiles ................. 149 Interdiction During the Halt Phase of a Major Theater War ..................................... 150 Engagement-Level Considerations ................ 151 Mission-Level Analysis ......................... 158 Observations.................................. 174 Chapter Twelve CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS AND SUGGESTED ACTIONS................................. 177 Recent Operations.............................. 177 Case Studies .................................. 179 Suggested Actions .............................. 180 Collaborative Actions .........................
Recommended publications
  • Kreis Kleve ZAHLEN DATEN FAKTEN AUSGEWÄHLTE STATISTIKEN
    Kreis Kleve ZAHLEN DATEN FAKTEN AUSGEWÄHLTE STATISTIKEN 11. Mai 2020 22 Inhalt I. Gebiet Tabelle 1: Flächennutzung nach Art der tatsächlichen Nutzung Vergleich zwischen Kreis Kleve und NRW (Diagramm) Tabelle 2: Flächennutzung nach Art der tatsächlichen Nutzung in Hektar II. Bevölkerung Tabelle 3: Bevölkerungsstand in den Städten und Gemeinden des Kreises Kleve (2016-2019) (Fortschreibung auf Basis des Zensus 2011) Tabelle 4: Altersstruktur und Bevölkerungsstruktur am 31.12.2018 Kreis Kleve im Vergleich zum Land Nordrhein-Westfalen Tabelle 5: Ausländische Bevölkerung nach Nationen Tabelle 6: Bevölkerungsvorausberechnung 2018-2040 für den Kreis Kleve Tabelle 7: Bevölkerungsvorausberechnung 2014-2040 für den Kreis Kleve – nach Alter (Diagramm) III. Erwerbstätigkeit Tabelle 8: Sozialversicherungspflichtig Beschäftigte im Jahr 2018 nach Wirtschaftsgruppen – Kreis Kleve und NRW Tabelle 9: Sozialversicherungspflichtig Beschäftigte in den Städten und Gemeinden des Kreises Kleve Tabelle 10: Beschäftigtenentwicklung seit 1980 Tabelle 11: Arbeitsplatzdichte Tabelle 12: Geringfügig entlohnte Beschäftigte im Kreis Kleve Tabelle 13: Arbeitslosenzahlen Kreis Kleve, NRW und Deutschland Tabelle 14: Arbeitslosenzahlen im Kreis Kleve (Diagramm) Tabelle 15: Arbeitslosenquoten 2010 – 2019 (Kreis Kleve, NRW und Deutschland) Tabelle 16: Berufspendler 2019 in den Städten und Gemeinden des Kreises Kleve IV. Wirtschaft Tabelle 17: Bruttoinlandsprodukt in jeweiligen Preisen je Erwerbstätigen im Kreis Kleve im Vergleich zur überregionalen Entwicklung seit 2000 Tabelle 18: Gewerbeanzeigen im Kreis Kleve Entwicklung seit 1997 Tabelle 19: Exportquote im Verarbeitenden Gewerbe – Kreis Kleve im Vergleich zu NRW – Entwicklung seit 2008 (Diagramm) Tabelle 20: Verarbeitendes Gewerbe in den Städten und Gemeinden des Kreises Kleve im Jahr 2018 Tabelle 21: Handwerksunternehmen im Kreis Kleve Tabelle 22: Kaufkraft/ Einzelhandelszentralität Tabelle 23: Hebesätze Grund-/ Gewerbesteuer 2020 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Kommune Anlaufstelle Adresse Ansprechpartner Telefonnummer / Telefax E-Mail
    Kreis Kleve, Der Landrat Ihre Aufenthaltsgestattung oder Duldung läuft in Kürze ab und muss verlängert werden? Hierzu ist ein persönlicher Besuch der Ausländerbehörde in der Regel nicht erforderlich. Stattdessen können Sie Ihre Gestattung oder Duldung zur Verlängerung bei Ihrer Stadt- bzw. Gemeindeverwaltung vor Ort abgeben. Sie erhalten dann vorübergehend eine Kopie Ihres Ausweisdokuments, versehen mit dem amtlichen Hinweis „Original liegt zur Verlängerung in der Ausländerbehörde vor.“ Nach erfolgter Verlängerung kann das Dokument dann wieder bei Ihrer Stadt- bzw. Gemeindeverwaltung abgeholt werden. Telefonnummer / Kommune Anlaufstelle Adresse Ansprechpartner Telefax E-Mail 02821 660-55 / Gemeinde Bedburg-Hau Fachbereich Arbeit und Soziales Rathausplatz 1, 47551 Bedburg-Hau Dirk Peters 02821 660-56 [email protected] Christiane Wöltgen, 02822 75-1710, [email protected], Peter Meyer und 02822 75-1771, [email protected], Stadt Emmerich am Rhein Arbeit und Soziales Geistmarkt 1, 46446 Emmerich am Rhein Uwe Walkowiak 02822 75-1702 [email protected] Jan Hinzen, 02831 398-615, [email protected], Anke Friedrich und 02831 398-614 und [email protected], Stadt Geldern Abteilung für Soziales Issumer Tor 34, 47608 Geldern Ulrike Barg 02831 398-613 [email protected] 02823 320-333 / Stadt Goch Abteilung Sozialwesen Markt 15 (Postanschrift Markt 2), 47574 Goch Marvin Dierkes 02823 320-933 [email protected] Bärbel Hackstein, Katja Mannke und 02835 1080, Gemeinde Issum Bürgerbüro
    [Show full text]
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory figures As of Sept
    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2014. By Aaron M. U. Church, Associate Editor I 2015 USAF Almanac BOMBER AIRCRAFT flight controls actuate trailing edge surfaces that combine aileron, elevator, and rudder functions. New EHF satcom and high-speed computer upgrade B-1 Lancer recently entered full production. Both are part of the Defensive Management Brief: A long-range bomber capable of penetrating enemy defenses and System-Modernization (DMS-M). Efforts are underway to develop a new VLF delivering the largest weapon load of any aircraft in the inventory. receiver for alternative comms. Weapons integration includes the improved COMMENTARY GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator and JASSM-ER and future weapons The B-1A was initially proposed as replacement for the B-52, and four pro- such as GBU-53 SDB II, GBU-56 Laser JDAM, JDAM-5000, and LRSO. Flex- totypes were developed and tested in 1970s before program cancellation in ible Strike Package mods will feed GPS data to the weapons bays to allow 1977. The program was revived in 1981 as B-1B. The vastly upgraded aircraft weapons to be guided before release, to thwart jamming. It also will move added 74,000 lb of usable payload, improved radar, and reduced radar cross stores management to a new integrated processor. Phase 2 will allow nuclear section, but cut maximum speed to Mach 1.2. The B-1B first saw combat in and conventional weapons to be carried simultaneously to increase flexibility. Iraq during Desert Fox in December 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Military Operations in Kosovo: 1999-2001, Lessons Learned For
    LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS IN KOSOVO: 1999-2001 LESSONS LEARNED FOR JUDGE ADVOCATES Center for Law and Military Operations (CLAMO) The Judge Advocate General’s School United States Army Charlottesville, Virginia CENTER FOR LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS (CLAMO) Director COL David E. Graham Deputy Director LTC Stuart W. Risch Director, Domestic Operational Law (vacant) Director, Training & Support CPT Alton L. (Larry) Gwaltney, III Marine Representative Maj Cody M. Weston, USMC Advanced Operational Law Studies Fellows MAJ Keith E. Puls MAJ Daniel G. Jordan Automation Technician Mr. Ben R. Morgan Training Centers LTC Richard M. Whitaker Battle Command Training Program LTC James W. Herring Battle Command Training Program MAJ Phillip W. Jussell Battle Command Training Program CPT Michael L. Roberts Combat Maneuver Training Center MAJ Michael P. Ryan Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Peter R. Hayden Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Mark D. Matthews Joint Readiness Training Center SFC Michael A. Pascua Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Jonathan Howard National Training Center CPT Charles J. Kovats National Training Center Contact the Center The Center’s mission is to examine legal issues that arise during all phases of military operations and to devise training and resource strategies for addressing those issues. It seeks to fulfill this mission in five ways. First, it is the central repository within The Judge Advocate General's Corps for all-source data, information, memoranda, after-action materials and lessons learned pertaining to legal support to operations, foreign and domestic. Second, it supports judge advocates by analyzing all data and information, developing lessons learned across all military legal disciplines, and by disseminating these lessons learned and other operational information to the Army, Marine Corps, and Joint communities through publications, instruction, training, and databases accessible to operational forces, world-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • WHY the RCAF SHOULD FOCUS on INTEROPERABILITY THROUGH DATALINK Ltcol Seongju Kim
    WHY THE RCAF SHOULD FOCUS ON INTEROPERABILITY THROUGH DATALINK LtCol Seongju Kim JCSP 44 PCEMI 44 SERVICE PAPER ÉTUDE MILITAIRE Disclaimer Avertissement Opinions expressed remain those of the author and Les opinons exprimées n’engagent que leurs auteurs do not represent Department of National Defence or et ne reflètent aucunement des politiques du Canadian Forces policy. This paper may not be used Ministère de la Défense nationale ou des Forces without written permission. canadiennes. Ce papier ne peut être reproduit sans autorisation écrite. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, représentée par represented by the Minister of National Defence, 2018. le ministre de la Défense nationale, 2018. CANADIAN FORCES COLLEGE – COLLÈGE DES FORCES CANADIENNES JCSP 44 – PCEMI 44 2017 – 2018 SERVICE PAPER - ÉTUDE MILITAIRE Why the RCAF Should Focus on Interoperability through Datalink LtCol Seongju Kim “This paper was written by a student “La présente étude a été rédigée par un attending the Canadian Forces College stagiaire du Collège des Forces in fulfilment of one of the requirements canadiennes pour satisfaire à l'une des of the Course of Studies. The paper is a exigences du cours. L'étude est un scholastic document, and thus contains document qui se rapporte au cours et facts and opinions, which the author contient donc des faits et des opinions alone considered appropriate and que seul l'auteur considère appropriés et correct for the subject. It does not convenables au sujet. Elle ne reflète pas necessarily reflect the policy or the nécessairement la politique ou l'opinion opinion of any agency, including the d'un organisme quelconque, y compris le Government of Canada and the gouvernement du Canada et le ministère Canadian Department of National de la Défense nationale du Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • “EYES” in SOUTHERN ASIAN SKIES Wing Commander ABS Chaudhry Research Fellow, Centre for Air Power Studies
    12\09 15 September 2009 “EYES” IN SOUTHERN ASIAN SKIES Wing Commander ABS Chaudhry Research Fellow, Centre for Air Power Studies The much awaited Airborne Warning and The integration of the AWACS with advance, providing enough time for IAF Control System (AWACS) for the Indian Air combat jets and air defence systems to other assets of the IAF, including 3 Force flew into the country escorted by combat jets, will provide a robust respond to the threat. fighter aircraft of the IAF. The AWACS decision-making cycle for air force AWACS in the Asian Region aircraft, or ‘Eye in the Sky’, landed in India commanders. The AWACS will on 25, May 2009 and was formally At the induction ceremony, the CAS Air inducted by Defence Minister A.K. Antony perform surveillance and Chief Marshal F.H. Major said: “AWACS on 28 May 2009. India had signed a deal reconnaissance roles and provide will enable the Air Force to project itself worth $1.1 billion for the supply of the three beyond visual range intelligence on as a formidable force. Integration of this Phalcon Airborne Early Warning (AEW) incoming enemy aircraft and sophisticated platform with our Air systems in April 2004.1 The Israeli system missiles well in advance, providing Defence Network will add a new is mounted on a Russian-built IL-76 enough time for IAF combat jets and dimension to the IAF’s capability to guard transport aircraft as a part of the tripartite air defence systems to respond to the Indian skies.” He added that AWACS agreement between India, Israel and the threat.
    [Show full text]
  • USAF USAF Weapons 2008 USAF Almanac by Susan H.H
    Gallery of USAF USAF Weapons 2008 USAF Almanac By Susan H.H. Young Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2007. Bombers B-1 Lancer Brief: A long-range, air refuelable multirole bomber capable of flying missions over intercontinental range, then penetrating enemy defenses with the largest pay- load of guided and unguided weapons in the Air Force inventory. Function: Long-range conventional bomber. Operator: ACC, AFMC. First Flight: Dec. 23, 1974 (B-1A); Oct. 18, 1984 (B-1B). Delivered: June 1985-May 1988. IOC: Oct. 1, 1986, Dyess AFB, Tex. (B-1B). Production: 104. Inventory: 67. Unit Location: Dyess AFB, Tex., Ellsworth AFB, S.D., Edwards AFB, Calif. Contractor: Boeing; AIL Systems; General Electric. Power Plant: four General Electric F101-GE-102 turbo- fans, each 30,780 lb thrust. B-1B Lancer (Richard VanderMeulen) Accommodation: four, pilot, copilot, and two systems officers (offensive and defensive), on zero/zero ACES II ejection seats. B-1B. Initiated in 1981, the first production model of Unit Location: Whiteman AFB, Mo. Dimensions: span spread 137 ft, swept aft 79 ft, length the improved variant B-1 flew in October 1984. USAF Contractor: Northrop Grumman; Boeing; Vought. 146 ft, height 34 ft. produced a total of 100. The active B-1B inventory was Power Plant: four General Electric F118-GE-100 turbo- Weights: empty equipped 192,000 lb, max operating reduced to 67 aircraft (from the remaining 92) with con- fans, each 17,300 lb thrust. weight 477,000 lb. solidation to two main operating bases within Air Combat Accommodation: two, mission commander and pilot, Ceiling: more than 30,000 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-Island Communications
    SOUTH CHINA SEA MILITARY CAPABILITY SERIES A Survey of Technologies and Capabilities on China’s Military Outposts in the South China Sea INTER-ISLAND COMMUNICATIONS J. Michael Dahm INTER-ISLAND COMMUNICATIONS J. Michael Dahm Copyright © 2020 The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC. All Rights Reserved. This study contains the best opinion of the author based on publicly available, open- source information at time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the assessments or opinions of APL sponsors. The author is responsible for all analysis and annotations of satellite images contained in this report. Satellite images are published under license from Maxar Technologies/DigitalGlobe, Inc., which retains copyrights to the original images. Satellite images in this report may not be reproduced without the express permission of JHU/APL and Maxar Technologies/DigitalGlobe, Inc. See Appendix A for notes on sources and analytic methods. NSAD-R-20-048 July 2020 Inter-Island Communicaitons Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 Troposcatter Communications, 散射通信 ..................................................................... 2 VHF/UHF and Other Line-of-Sight Communications ...................................................... 6 4G Cellular Communications ........................................................................................ 7 Airborne Communications Layer .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Saab Receives Order for Maintenance of Airborne Radar System Erieye for Sweden
    PRESS INFORMATION Page 1 (2) Date Reference June 5, 2012 CU 12:019 E Saab receives order for maintenance of airborne radar system Erieye for Sweden Defence and security company Saab has received an order from the Swedish Defence Materiel Administration (FMV) for maintenance of the Erieye airborne radar system. The order amount is SEK 125 million. - We’re proud that FMV is showing continued confidence in us and we look forward to further developing the Erieye radar system together with our Swedish client, says Micael Johansson, head of Saab’s business area Electronic Defence Systems. The contract covers services for the Swedish Erieye-system (Airborne Surveillance and Control, ASC890). This work will include providing technical support for the unit operations, and research and development for the ASC890 sensor and command- and control system. Work will take place between 2012 and 2014. Erieye is mainly developed and produced by Saab in Gothenburg, but work will also be undertaken at other sites. The sensor-and command- and control system provide access to a detailed situational awareness that can be used for example for border survellance, rescue operations and for tackling terrorism and organised crime. Saab’s airborne radar surveillance system Erieye has been well received on the market. The first system was delivered in 1997 for aircraft model 340 for the Swedish Air Force. Customers of the Saab 340 system also include Thailand and the United Arab Emirate. The radar system has been installed on the Embraer 145 and delivered to Brazil, Mexico and Greece. Saab is also delivering Erieye to Pakistan, installed on the Saab 2000 aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Program Acquisition Cost by Weapons System
    The estimated cost of this report or study for the Department of Defense is approximately $36,000 for the 2019 Fiscal Year. This includes $11,000 in expenses and $25,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2019FEB14 RefID: B-1240A2B FY 2020 Program Acquisition Costs by Weapon System Major Weapon Systems Overview The performance of United States (U.S.) weapon systems are unmatched, ensuring that U.S. military forces have a tactical combat advantage over any adversary in any environmental situation. The Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 acquisition (Procurement and Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E)) funding requested by the Department of Defense (DoD) totals $247.3 billion, which includes funding in the Base budget and the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) fund, totaling $143.1 billion for Procurement and $104.3 billion for RDT&E. The funding in the budget request represents a balanced portfolio approach to implement the military force objective established by the National Defense Strategy. Of the $247.3 billion in the request, $83.9 billion finances Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPs), which are acquisition programs that exceed a cost threshold established by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. To simplify the display of the various weapon systems, this book is organized by the following mission area categories: • Aircraft and Related Systems • Missiles and Munitions • Command, Control, Communications, • Shipbuilding and Maritime Systems Computers, and Intelligence (C4I) • Space Based Systems Systems • Science and Technology • Ground Systems • Mission Support Activities • Missile Defeat and Defense Programs FY 2020 Investment Total: $247.3 Billion $ in Billions Numbers may not add due to rounding Introduction FY 2020 Program Acquisition Costs by Weapon System The Distribution of Funding in FY 2020 for Procurement and RDT&E by Component and Category* $ in Billions $ in Billions * Funding in Mission Support activities are not represented in the above displays.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Forces Modernisation Projects 8 2.1 Denmark’S Defence Agreement 2018-2023 9 2.2 Hungary’S Zrinyi 2026 10 2.3 the United Kingdom’S to the Future and Beyond
    Food for thought 03-2021 Land Forces Modernisation Challenges of Transformation Written by Miguel Gonzalez Buitrago Lucia Santabarbara AN EXPERTISE FORUM CONTRIBUTING TO EUROPEAN CONTRIBUTING TO FORUM AN EXPERTISE SINCE 1953 ARMIES INTEROPERABILITY European Army Interoperability Center Simone Rinaldi This paper was drawn up by Miguel Gonzalez Buitrago, Lucia Santabarbara and Sim- one Rinaldi under the supervision and guidance of Mr Mario Blokken, Director of the Permanent Secretariat. This Food for Thought paper is a document that gives an initial reflection on the theme. The content is not reflecting the positions of the member states but consists of elements that can initiate and feed the discussions and analyses in the domain of the theme. All our studies are available on www.finabel.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Chapter 1: Military Doctrine and Warfare Scenarios 3 1.1 Unconventional Warfare 4 1.2 Asymmetric Warfare 6 1.3 Hybrid Warfare 7 Chapter 2: Land Forces Modernisation Projects 8 2.1 Denmark’s Defence Agreement 2018-2023 9 2.2 Hungary’s Zrinyi 2026 10 2.3 The United Kingdom’s to the Future and Beyond. 11 2.4 Greece’s Future Force Structure 2013-2027 12 2.5 Finland’s Total Defence 14 Chapter 3: Cutting edge technology: “Looking at the near future.” 15 3.1 Drones and Jammers 17 3.2 Drone Swarms 19 3.3 Hypersonic Weaponry 19 Chapter 4: Modernisation of Military Training 20 Conclusions 22 Bibliography 23 2 INTRODUCTION Land Force Modernisation is a process that omous systems. These may shape the nature entails changes of military equipment and ca- of conflict and facilitate ground forces oper- pacities at the strategic, operational, and tac- ations in challenging contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Disjointed War: Military Operations in Kosovo, 1999
    Disjointed War Military Operations in Kosovo, 1999 Bruce R. Nardulli, Walter L. Perry, Bruce Pirnie John Gordon IV, John G. McGinn Prepared for the United States Army Approved for public release; distribution unlimited R Arroyo Center The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army under contract number DASW01-01-C-0003. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Disjointed war : military operations in Kosovo, 1999 / Bruce R. Nardulli ... [et al.]. p. cm. “MR-1406.” Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8330-3096-5 1. Kosovo (Serbia)—History—Civil War, 1998—Campaigns. 2. North Atlantic Treaty Organization—Armed Forces—Yugoslavia. I. Nardulli, Bruce R. DR2087.5 .D57 2002 949.703—dc21 2002024817 Cover photos courtesy of U.S. Air Force Link (B2) at www.af.mil, and NATO Media Library (Round table Meeting) at www.nato.int. RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. Cover design by Stephen Bloodsworth © Copyright 2002 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2002 by RAND 1700 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 201 North Craig Street, Suite 102, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/ To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] PREFACE Following the 1999 Kosovo conflict, the Army asked RAND Arroyo Center to prepare an authoritative and detailed account of military operations with a focus on ground operations, especially Task Force Hawk.
    [Show full text]