DOCSLIB.ORG

Russia's Place in Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russia's Place in Europe Contents Preface 9 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 11 PART I THE DOMESTIC DIMENSION Introduction 19 Chapter 1 Russian National Interests: The State of Discussion By Andrey Kortunov 21 Two Approaches to National Interests 21 Domestic Interaction with Foreign Policy 25 “Westernizing” vs. “Slavophile” Understanding of National Interests 38 Foreign Policy Today — Two Agendas 44 Chapter 2 Impacts of Domestic and Regional Factors on Russia’s Foreign and Security Policy By Tatyana Parkhalina 47 Three Schools of Thought 48 Rising Nationalism 50 The Political Paradigm 51 Economic Groups and Foreign Policy 52 The Regional Agenda 54 Chapter 3 The Myth of the “West” in Russian Political Culture and its Impact on Foreign and Security Policy By Tatyana Yevgeneva 59 Historical Background 60 Identity Crisis in the Late Soviet Period 63 “Communists” vs. “Democrats” 65 Political Myths in Modern Russia 67 Concluding Remarks 71 A Country in Transition 71 Between Continuity and Change 73 Towards a Consensus on Russia’s National Interests 80 Foreign Policy at the Crossroads? 84 PART II THE CIS DIMENSION Introduction 87 Chapter 4 Reluctant Adaptation: Russia’s Security Policy towards New Eastern Europe and the Baltic States By Dmitriy Trenin 89 Discontinuities of the New Strategic Environment 90 Accepting the Finality of Independence 92 Security Alignments 95 A Different Kind of Russia? 96 Whither Russia? 97 Chapter 5 Ukrainian-Russian Relations and the Debate on NATO Enlargement By Leonid Bilousov 101 Inherited Political Systems 102 The Legacy of Soviet Relations 103 A “Triangle” Relationship 105 The NATO Debate in Kiev’s Political Elite 107 Regional Stability and NATO Enlargement 110 Chapter 6 Belarus, Russia, and a New European Security Architecture By Anatoliy Rozanov 113 The OSCE and a Common Security Space 114 NATO Enlargement: A View from Belarus 116 Belarus-Russia: The Military Aspect of Cooperation 123 Concluding Remarks 129 CIS Priority of Russian Foreign Policy 130 Bilateral Relations 132 Relations with the Republic of Belarus 134 Russian-Ukrainian Relations 137 Post-Soviet Integration? 141 PART III THE EUROPEAN AND GLOBAL DIMENSION Introduction 145 Chapter 7 Soviet Security Concepts in Historical Retrospective By Aleksey Filitov 147 Choosing the Confrontation Paradigm 148 Provoking Militarization 152 The Myth of Khrushchev’s “New Thinking” 155 External Security at Any Cost 160 Chapter 8 Russian Foreign and Security Policy in its Global Dimension By Yevgeniy Bazhanov 163 The Original Strategy and its Failure 163 The Emergence of a Modified Strategy 164 Objectives 167 Strategy 170 Conclusion 174 Chapter 9 Security Relations between Russia and the Western World By Sergey Rogov 177 The Danger of Isolation 178 A Weak Performance in the Early 1990s 180 New Security Relations with the West 183 Economic Interaction 186 Conclusion 188 Chapter 10 Russia’s Concept of a New European Security Architecture By Igor Maximychev 192 A Continental Security System 192 NATO-Russia Relations 196 Cooperation in Europe 201 Chapter 11 East-West Cooperation and International Ecological Security By Vassiliy Sokolov and Andrey Korneev 205 The Environment as a Security Issue 205 Relationship between Environmental and Military Security 210 Military Interests and Global Environment: 213 The Soviet/Russian Case 213 East-West Cooperation in Environmental Security 216 Concluding Remarks 219 Cold War Legacy 219 Russia in a Multi-Polar World 223 Russia within European Security Structures 225 Russia and NATO Enlargement 226 Traditional and Modern Security Agendas 229 CONCLUSIONS 233 Definition of National Interests 235 Russia’s Relationship with CIS Neighbors 236 Russia in Europe and in the Global Setting 237 How Can Russia Meet the Challenge? 238 What Can the West Do? 239 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY Published Sources 243 Books and Articles 243 About the Authors 251 Preface This book addresses the role of the Russian Federation within the post-Cold War European security architecture. It provides a forum for relevant Russian foreign and security policy analysts, as well as ex- perts from Ukraine and Belarus, to share their views and to contem- plate official positions on various aspects of this topic. The contribu- tions were presented at an international conference on Russia’s Role within a New European Security Architecture, organized by the Center for Security Studies and Conflict Research at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, held in Zurich on 12-13 December 1997. Contributors and participants from Moscow included Prof. Dr. Ye. P. Bazhanov, Diplomatic Academy at the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Prof. Dr. A. M. Filitov, Institute of General History at the Russian Academy of Sciences; Dr. A. V. Korneev, Institute of USA and Canada Studies at the Russian Academy of Sciences; Dr. A. V. Kortunov, Moscow Public Science Foundation; Dr. I. F. Maximychev, Institute of European Studies at the Russian Academy of Sciences; Dr. T. G. Parkhalina, Institute of Scientific Information at the Russian Academy of Sciences; Prof. Dr. S. M. Rogov, Institute of USA and Canada Studies at the Russian Academy of Sciences; Dr. V. I. Sokolov, Institute of USA and Canada Studies at the Russian Acad- emy of Sciences; Mrs. Ye. Stepanova, Carnegie Moscow Center; Dr. D. V. Trenin, Carnegie Moscow Center; Prof. Dr. T. V. Yevgeneva, Russian State University for the Humanities; Dr. N. V. Yudina, Dip- lomatic Academy at the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Participants from Kiev and Minsk included Dr. L. V. Bilousov, Ukrainian Center for International Security Studies; Mr. A. I. Veselovskiy, Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Prof. Dr. A. A. Rozanov, Belorussian State University; and Dr. L. F. Zayko, Center for Strategic Initiatives “East-West.” Chairpersons and participants from Zurich, Cologne, and Paris included Dr. O. Alexandrowa, German Federal Institute for Eastern European and International Studies, Cologne; Prof. Dr. C. Goehrke, University of Zurich; Dr. D. Müller and Mr. J. Perović, Center for Security Studies and Conflict Research, ETH Zurich; Prof. Dr. J. Scherrer, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris; Prof. Dr. K. R. Spillmann and Dr. A. Wenger, Center for Security Studies and Conflict Research, ETH Zurich; Dr. G. Wettig, German Federal Institute for Eastern European and International Studies, Cologne. The conference was organized under the auspices of the International Relations and Security Network (ISN),1 an Internet-based initiative to promote dialogue and cooperation in security matters at the interna- tional level. As part of Switzerland’s participation in NATO’s Part- nership for Peace, ISN is supported by the Swiss government, whose financial assistance in organizing the conference is appreciated. The editors thank all the conference participants for their contribu- tions. They particularly appreciate the efforts of the speakers in re- vising their papers to include the results of discussions. They ac- knowledge the interest professed by the Russian, Ukrainian, and Belo- russian Embassies in the event. For the organization of the conference, their many thanks go to their staff, particularly to Derek Müller, Jeronim Perović, Daniel Möckli, and Erika Girod. With regard to the organization and scope of this book, Derek Müller and Jeronim Perović merit special mention and gratitude. The editors would also like to thank Lyn Shepard for his help with the manuscript. The views expressed in these conference papers and analytical sections are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the institutions and individuals that so generously assisted them. 1 ISN can be found at the web-address http://www.isn.ethz.ch. General Introduction 11 Wherever Russians gather — may this be in their homes in Moscow or in Zurich with the purpose of analyzing European security problems — their discussion will inevitably reach the philosophical question of Russia’s nature. With this remark, Sergey Rogov provoked thoughtful amusement among the participants of a December 1997 conference on Russia’s Role within a New European Security Architecture, most of whom seemed to share that experience and to regard the question of Russia’s nature as a relevant, important consideration. Yet Russia’s nature is ambiguous. In many respects, the country seems to be a “normal” European democracy with constitutional protection of basic freedoms, institutions of balanced powers, free elections, more or less independ- ent news media, and other formal characteristics of Western societies. Important social indicators, such as demographic structure, levels of urbanization and education, social and professional mobility, seem to suggest that Russian society resembles Western democracies. However, Russian authorities are not in a position to promote large- scale political mobilization. A majority of Russians takes more inter- est in questions regarding daily life, such as the increase in prices, collapse of the economy, or growing unemployment, than in politics. Only a few Russians would describe their country in terms of a “democracy” or “welfare state,” “capitalism” or “liberalism.” A large part of the population would call Russian society “oligarchic,” ruled by a few, highly influential individuals, politicians, and masters of financial empires and oil or gas monopolies. The legacy of paternalis- tic, even authoritarian features is an important aspect of Russia’s po- litical system, as the officially promoted search for a new “Russian idea” suggests. The identification of Russia’s national
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Suppression of Jewish Culture by the Soviet Union's Emigration
    \\server05\productn\B\BIN\23-1\BIN104.txt unknown Seq: 1 18-JUL-05 11:26 A STRUGGLE TO PRESERVE ETHNIC IDENTITY: THE SUPPRESSION OF JEWISH CULTURE BY THE SOVIET UNION’S EMIGRATION POLICY BETWEEN 1945-1985 I. SOCIAL AND CULTURAL STATUS OF JEWS IN THE SOVIET SOCIETY BEFORE AND AFTER THE WAR .................. 159 R II. BEFORE THE BORDERS WERE CLOSED: SOVIET EMIGRATION POLICY UNDER STALIN (1945-1947) ......... 163 R III. CLOSING OF THE BORDER: CESSATION OF JEWISH EMIGRATION UNDER STALIN’S REGIME .................... 166 R IV. THE STRUGGLE CONTINUES: SOVIET EMIGRATION POLICY UNDER KHRUSHCHEV AND BREZHNEV .................... 168 R V. CONCLUSION .............................................. 174 R I. SOCIAL AND CULTURAL STATUS OF JEWS IN THE SOVIET SOCIETY BEFORE AND AFTER THE WAR Despite undergoing numerous revisions, neither the Soviet Constitu- tion nor the Soviet Criminal Code ever adopted any laws or regulations that openly or implicitly permitted persecution of or discrimination against members of any minority group.1 On the surface, the laws were always structured to promote and protect equality of rights and status for more than one hundred different ethnic groups. Since November 15, 1917, a resolution issued by the Second All-Russia Congress of the Sovi- ets called for the “revoking of all and every national and national-relig- ious privilege and restriction.”2 The Congress also expressly recognized “the right of the peoples of Russia to free self-determination up to seces- sion and the formation of an independent state.” Identical resolutions were later adopted by each of the 15 Soviet Republics. Furthermore, Article 124 of the 1936 (Stalin-revised) Constitution stated that “[f]reedom of religious worship and freedom of anti-religious propaganda is recognized for all citizens.” 3 1 See generally W.E.
    [Show full text]
  • European Influence on Sport and Sport Press Formation and Development in Russia Alekseev KA*, Gromova LP and Silantev KV
    Research Global Media Journal 2016 Vol.Special Issue ISSN 1550-7521 No.S3:01 European Influence on Sport and Sport Press Formation and Development in Russia Alekseev KA*, Gromova LP and Silantev KV Saint-Petersburg State University, Russia *Corresponding author: Alekseev KA, Saint-Petersburg State University, Russia, Saint Petersburg, Universitetskaya Naberejnaya, 7/9, 199034, Russia, Tel: +7 812 328-20-00; E-mail: [email protected] Received date: May 06, 2016; Accepted date: June 02, 2016; Published date: June 10, 2016 Copyright: © 2016 Alekseev KA, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Citation: Alekseev KA, Gromova LP, Silantev KV. European Influence on Sport and Sport Press Formation and Development in Russia. Global Media Journal. 2016, S3:01 this case, is of major significance. That is why the problem of peculiarities, directions and cause-and-effect relations in sport Abstract development becomes key and basic for the investigator of sport journalism for any further studies. In its turn, the system The article deals with the phenomenon of foreign of sport organization in each country is being formed in influence on sport and sport journalism development in dependence on the complex of reasons, involving the historical Russia at the turn of XIX and XX centuries. Due to the traditions, the type of state structure, the dominating ideology, number of objective circumstances, connected with the the social-economic conditions, the level of science, peculiarities of historical development in Russia, sport engineering and social culture development.
    [Show full text]
  • New Documents on Mongolia and the Cold War
    Cold War International History Project Bulletin, Issue 16 New Documents on Mongolia and the Cold War Translation and Introduction by Sergey Radchenko1 n a freezing November afternoon in Ulaanbaatar China and Russia fell under the Mongolian sword. However, (Ulan Bator), I climbed the Zaisan hill on the south- after being conquered in the 17th century by the Manchus, Oern end of town to survey the bleak landscape below. the land of the Mongols was divided into two parts—called Black smoke from gers—Mongolian felt houses—blanketed “Outer” and “Inner” Mongolia—and reduced to provincial sta- the valley; very little could be discerned beyond the frozen tus. The inhabitants of Outer Mongolia enjoyed much greater Tuul River. Chilling wind reminded me of the cold, harsh autonomy than their compatriots across the border, and after winter ahead. I thought I should have stayed at home after all the collapse of the Qing dynasty, Outer Mongolia asserted its because my pen froze solid, and I could not scribble a thing right to nationhood. Weak and disorganized, the Mongolian on the documents I carried up with me. These were records religious leadership appealed for help from foreign countries, of Mongolia’s perilous moves on the chessboard of giants: including the United States. But the first foreign troops to its strategy of survival between China and the Soviet Union, appear were Russian soldiers under the command of the noto- and its still poorly understood role in Asia’s Cold War. These riously cruel Baron Ungern who rode past the Zaisan hill in the documents were collected from archival depositories and pri- winter of 1921.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Conventional Armed Forces: on the Verge of Collapse?
    Order Code 97-820 F CRS Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web Russian Conventional Armed Forces: On the Verge of Collapse? September 4, 1997 (name redacted) Specialist in Russian Affairs Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Russian Conventional Armed Forces: On the Verge of Collapse? Summary All quantitative indicators show a sharp, and in most cases an accelerating, decline in the size of the Russian armed forces. Since 1986, Russian military manpower has decreased by over 70 percent; tanks and other armored vehicles by two-thirds; and artillery, combat aircraft, and surface warships by one-third. Weapons procurement has been plummeting for over a decade. In some key categories, such as aircraft, tanks, and surface warships, procurement has virtually stopped. This has led not only to a decline in present inventory, but implies a long-term crisis of bloc obsolescence in the future. Russian Government decisions and the budget deficit crisis have hit the Ministry of Defense very hard, cutting defense spending drastically and transforming the Defense Ministry into a residual claimant on scarce resources. Many experts believe that if these budgetary constraints continue for 2-3 more years, they must lead either to more drastic force reductions or to military collapse. Military capabilities are also in decline. Reportedly, few, if any, of Russia’s army divisions are combat-ready. Field exercises, flight training, and out-of-area naval deployments have been sharply reduced. Morale is low, partly because of non-payment of servicemen’s salaries. Draft evasion and desertion are rising.
    [Show full text]
  • Dostoevsky Omsk State University 2021
    Russia Siberia Omsk Region Capital city Omsk Area 141 140 km² Average annual winter temperature – 20 С Population 1 904 294 Winter down to – 40 С Summer up to + 35 С o Located in Western Siberia o Borders Kazakhstan in the south o 2,555 km away from Moscow o Landscape: steppes in the south, forests in the central part, and taiga in the north o GMT +6 Omsk o Founded in 1716 o Population 1.2 million o Located on two rivers Irtysh and Om o For a brief period during the Russian Civil War in 1918–1919, it served as the capital of the Russian state Dostoevsky Omsk State University (OmSU) o Famous Russian novelist Fyodor Dostoevsky spent 4 years in Omsk fortress (1850-1854) o This exile time influenced his future work, he was reborn here o There is the center for Dostoevsky studies at OmSU Omsk is a large industrial center with machine engineering, instrument engineering, consumer goods and manufacturing enterprises. One of the biggest oil refineries in the world is located here. Students have a chance to visit the plant when attending OmSU cultural and educational programs History… 2004 – OMSU WAS NAMED AFTER 1979 – THE FIRST F.M. DOSTOEVSKY OMSU GRADUATES 1974 – THE RECEIVED THEIR UNIVERSITY WAS DEGREES FOUNDED TWO ORIGINAL FACULTIES: HUMANITIES AND SCIENCE OmSU nowadays o 1 Institute, 12 Faculties and 66 Chairs o 55 Undergraduate Degree Programs o 33 Master Programs o 32 PhD Programs o 8,500 students o over 600 international students from 24 countries o over 25,000 graduates o 10 buildings and a Scientific Library o 22 university laboratories
    [Show full text]
  • The Sochi 2014 Winter Olympics Represents an Inflection Point for Russia, a Test of How the Nation Handles Many Challenges Both Domestically and Abroad
    AVAILABLE FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY The Sochi 2014 Winter Olympics represents an inflection point for Russia, a test of how the nation handles many challenges both domestically and abroad. The Olympic Games will test the ability of the leaders of the country and its citizens to provide adequate answers to these challenges. ABOUT RUSSIA DIRECT: Russia Direct is an international analytical outlet of Russia Beyond The Headlines launched in June of 2013. The website, russia-direct.org, features articles, white pa- pers and monthly memos that provide the kind of nuanced understanding required by those with a deep involvement and interest in Russia-U.S. relations and Russian foreign policy. Russia Direct is fast becoming the pre-eminent forum for high-level policy mak- ers, experts, international observers and business leaders from the U.S., Russia and other countries. Long-term, the goal of the project is to improve multilateral relations at the interpersonal, interagency and intergovernmental levels. sia-U.S. cooperation in the nuclear energy COMING UP IN FEBRUARY sphere. The big question now is what will come in place of the agreement. The Russia Direct Quarterly report will outline the history of the HEU Purchase Agreement and will give an assessment of the results in the format of a round- table discussion where Russian and inter- national experts will share their views. The report will also examine the unique- ness of the project and show how the disarmament process can use commer- cial mechanisms. It will conclude with a AFP/EAST NEWS AFP/EAST discussion exploring various perspectives of the future of Russia-U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Election Observation Mission Russian Federation Presidential Election, 18 March 2018
    OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Election Observation Mission Russian Federation Presidential Election, 18 March 2018 INTERIM REPORT 5 February – 1 March 2018 2 March 2018 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The Russian Federation will hold a presidential election on 18 March 2018. The Central Election Commission (CEC) registered eight candidates, seven fielded by political parties and one, the incumbent president, as a self-nominated candidate standing for a second consecutive and a fourth overall term. One candidate is a woman. • Several amendments to the election legislation were adopted since the last presidential election, most recently in December 2017, responding to some previous ODIHR recommendations. A number of other recommendations, including those pertaining to guarantees for freedom of assembly, association and expression, remain to be addressed. • The campaign is generally low-key but has become more visible following the 23 February Defenders of Fatherland Day celebrations. Meanwhile, outdoor campaign events are limited in visibility. By contrast, concurrent get-out-the-vote initiatives, with a view to ensuring a high voter turnout, launched by a multitude of actors including local authorities, private and state enterprises, feature prominently across the country. • The presidential election is administered a by four-tiered election administration that serves a five- year term. Preparations for the elections are underway and legal deadlines have so far been respected. The CEC has held regular, public, at times live-streamed, sessions with extensive discussions on various issues including alleged interference by local authorities into the electoral process. A comprehensive voter information campaign, launched by the CEC, is ongoing. • The number of registered voters in the Russian Federation as of 1 January is 108,968,869, including 1,875,408 voters abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian State Duma , On-Stage and Off: Inquiry, Impeachment , and Opposition
    The Russian State Duma , On-Stage and Off: Inquiry, Impeachment , and Opposition MARTHA MERRITT L egislatures in mixed regimes the world over are often less popular than pres- identa, dismissed as "talking shops" while executive power lays claim to active and decisive leadership.l This tendency is clear in Russia's relatively new political institutions, with the State Duma rated in December 1999 as the Ieast trusted organ of government.z Both reflecting and helping to consolidate this atti- tude, the harsh national media routinely belittle the Duma: Deputies are said to "scurry like cockroaches" as they register electronic votes for themselves and their absent colleagues during the allotted fifteen-second period, the television news describes deputies as "babbling" while reporters discuss crises as yet unad- dressed, and during election periods television talk shows run polis to ask view- ers whether the country needs a national legislature at all. Not surprisingly, those who choose to telephone in this most unrepresentative of surveys defeat scattered support and record thousands of antiparliament "votes" Duma-bashing is something of a national sport in Russia, but it was also a use- ful resource for executive power as exercised by President Yeltsin. Although some commentators predicted a dramatic lessening of tension between Yeltsin's suc- cessor and the Duma after the relatively pro-government parliamentary elections of December 1999,3 the very majority that they had anticipated led to a dramat- ic walk-out of minority parties in early 2000 when the two largest legislative blocs, the Communists and Unity, found common ground in dividing committee chairperson positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Guide, and to Issac and Stasya for Being Great Friends During Our Weird Chicago Summer
    Russian Duma 1917 (DUMA) MUNUC 33 ONLINE 1 Russian Duma 1917 (DUMA) | MUNUC 33 Online TABLE OF CONTENTS ______________________________________________________ CHAIR LETTERS………………………….….………………………….……..….3 ROOM MECHANICS…………………………………………………………… 6 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM………………………….……………..…………......9 HISTORY OF THE PROBLEM………………………………………………………….16 ROSTER……………………………………………………….………………………..23 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………..…………….. 46 2 Russian Duma 1917 (DUMA) | MUNUC 33 Online CHAIR LETTERS ____________________________________________________ My Fellow Russians, We stand today on the edge of a great crisis. Our nation has never been more divided, more war- stricken, more fearful of the future. Yet, the promise and the greatness of Russia remains undaunted. The Russian Provisional Government can and will overcome these challenges and lead our Motherland into the dawn of a new day. Out of character. To introduce myself, I’m a fourth-year Economics and History double major, currently writing a BA thesis on World War II rationing in the United States. I compete on UChicago’s travel team and I additionally am a CD for our college conference. Besides that, I am the VP of the Delta Kappa Epsilon fraternity, previously a member of an all-men a cappella group and a proud procrastinator. This letter, for example, is about a month late. We decided to run this committee for a multitude of reasons, but I personally think that Russian in 1917 represents such a critical point in history. In an unlikely way, the most autocratic regime on Earth became replaced with a socialist state. The story of this dramatic shift in government and ideology represents, to me, one of the most interesting parts of history: that sometimes facts can be stranger than fiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Lukyanov Doctrine: Conceptual Origins of Russia's Hybrid Foreign Policy—The Case of Ukraine
    Saint Louis University Law Journal Volume 64 Number 1 Internationalism and Sovereignty Article 3 (Fall 2019) 4-23-2020 Lukyanov Doctrine: Conceptual Origins of Russia’s Hybrid Foreign Policy—The Case of Ukraine. Igor Gretskiy [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Igor Gretskiy, Lukyanov Doctrine: Conceptual Origins of Russia’s Hybrid Foreign Policy—The Case of Ukraine., 64 St. Louis U. L.J. (2020). Available at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj/vol64/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Saint Louis University Law Journal by an authorized editor of Scholarship Commons. For more information, please contact Susie Lee. SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW LUKYANOV DOCTRINE: CONCEPTUAL ORIGINS OF RUSSIA’S HYBRID FOREIGN POLICY—THE CASE OF UKRAINE. IGOR GRETSKIY* Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Kremlin’s assertiveness and unpredictability on the international arena has always provoked enormous attention to its foreign policy tools and tactics. Although there was no shortage of publications on topics related to different aspects of Moscow’s foreign policy varying from non-proliferation of nuclear weapons to soft power diplomacy, Russian studies as a discipline found itself deadlocked within the limited number of old dichotomies, (e.g., West/non-West, authoritarianism/democracy, Europe/non-Europe), initially proposed to understand the logic of Russia’s domestic and foreign policy transformations.1 Furthermore, as the decision- making process in Moscow was getting further from being transparent due to the increasingly centralized character of its political system, the emergence of new theoretical frameworks with greater explanatory power was an even more difficult task.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction Almost nobody disputes that the end of the Cold War had a profound impact on the whole pattern of international security but, more than a decade after the transition, the character of the post-Cold War se- curity order still remains hotly contested. This book explores the idea that, since decolonisation, the regional level of security has become both more autonomous and more prominent in international politics, and that the ending of the Cold War accelerated this process (Katzenstein 2000). This idea follows naturally from the ending of bipolarity. Without su- perpower rivalry intruding obsessively into all regions, local powers have more room for manoeuvre. For a decade after the ending of the Cold War, both the remaining superpower and the other great powers (China, EU, Japan, Russia) had less incentive, and displayed less will, to intervene in security affairs outside their own regions. The terrorist attack on the United States in 2001 may well trigger some reassertion of great power interventionism, but this is likely to be for quite narrow and specific purposes, and seems unlikely to recreate the general willingness to intervene abroad that was a feature of Cold War superpower rivalry. The relative autonomy of regional security constitutes a pattern of in- ternational security relations radically different from the rigid structure of superpower bipolarity that defined the Cold War. In our view, this pattern is not captured adequately by either ‘unipolar’ or ‘multipolar’ designations of the international system structure. Nor is it captured by the idea of ‘globalisation’ or by the dismal conclusion that the best that IR can do in conceptualising the security order of the post-Cold War world is to call it ‘the new world disorder’ (Carpenter 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Japan's Security Relations with China Since 1989
    Japan’s Security Relations with China since 1989 The Japanese–Chinese security relationship is one of the most important vari- ables in the formation of a new strategic environment in the Asia-Pacific region which has not only regional but also global implications. The book investigates how and why since the 1990s China has turned in the Japanese perception from a benign neighbour to an ominous challenge, with implications not only for Japan’s security, but also its economy, role in Asia and identity as the first devel- oped Asian nation. Japan’s reaction to this challenge has been a policy of engagement, which consists of political and economic enmeshment of China, hedged by political and military power balancing. The unique approach of this book is the use of an extended security concept to analyse this policy, which allows a better and more systematic understanding of its many inherent contradictions and conflicting dynamics, including the centrifugal forces arising from the Japan–China–US triangular relationship. Many contradictions of Japan’s engagement policy arise from the overlap of military and political power-balancing tools which are part of containment as well as of engagement, a reality which is downplayed by Japan but not ignored by China. The complex nature of engagement explains the recent reinforcement of Japan’s security cooperation with the US and Tokyo’s efforts to increase the security dialogues with countries neighbouring China, such as Vietnam, Myanmar and the five Central Asian countries. The book raises the crucial question of whether Japan’s political leadership, which is still preoccupied with finding a new political constellation and with overcoming a deep economic crisis, is able to handle such a complex policy in the face of an increasingly assertive China and a US alliance partner with strong swings between engaging and containing China’s power.
    [Show full text]