Translation Memory Management
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Translators' Tool
The Translator’s Tool Box A Computer Primer for Translators by Jost Zetzsche Version 9, December 2010 Copyright © 2010 International Writers’ Group, LLC. All rights reserved. This document, or any part thereof, may not be reproduced or transmitted electronically or by any other means without the prior written permission of International Writers’ Group, LLC. ABBYY FineReader and PDF Transformer are copyrighted by ABBYY Software House. Acrobat, Acrobat Reader, Dreamweaver, FrameMaker, HomeSite, InDesign, Illustrator, PageMaker, Photoshop, and RoboHelp are registered trademarks of Adobe Systems Inc. Acrocheck is copyrighted by acrolinx GmbH. Acronis True Image is a trademark of Acronis, Inc. Across is a trademark of Nero AG. AllChars is copyrighted by Jeroen Laarhoven. ApSIC Xbench and Comparator are copyrighted by ApSIC S.L. Araxis Merge is copyrighted by Araxis Ltd. ASAP Utilities is copyrighted by eGate Internet Solutions. Authoring Memory Tool is copyrighted by Sajan. Belarc Advisor is a trademark of Belarc, Inc. Catalyst and Publisher are trademarks of Alchemy Software Development Ltd. ClipMate is a trademark of Thornsoft Development. ColourProof, ColourTagger, and QA Solution are copyrighted by Yamagata Europe. Complete Word Count is copyrighted by Shauna Kelly. CopyFlow is a trademark of North Atlantic Publishing Systems, Inc. CrossCheck is copyrighted by Global Databases, Ltd. Déjà Vu is a trademark of ATRIL Language Engineering, S.L. Docucom PDF Driver is copyrighted by Zeon Corporation. dtSearch is a trademark of dtSearch Corp. EasyCleaner is a trademark of ToniArts. ExamDiff Pro is a trademark of Prestosoft. EmEditor is copyrighted by Emura Software inc. Error Spy is copyrighted by D.O.G. GmbH. FileHippo is copyrighted by FileHippo.com. -
The 2017 Global Patent & IP Trends Indicator
Front cover An in-depth look at the foreign filing strategies of global patent owners June 2017 The 2017 Global Patent & IP Trends Indicator 1. Introduction The Global Patent & IP Trends Indicator is an annual report issued by RWS inovia, the world leader in foreign patent filing, IP translation, patent search and database services. This year’s survey confirms something our readers all know – it is a The main findings of the 2017 report tough job being an in-house IP counsel. They are expected to keep track of IP developments and trends not only locally, but internationally. In- indicate overall patent activity and house counsel must also be able to predict laws and the consequences international filing rates on the rise, with of court decisions well into the future. Moreover, all of this needs to be the upcoming European Unitary Patent done on a smaller budget, set by a CFO who may have little appreciation of the nuances of IP law. on the minds of patent professionals around the world. RWS inovia’s Global Patent & IP Trends Indicator gives you a view into what your IP colleagues are doing to keep up with the changing patent landscape. If you are in private practice, you will find plenty of insight into what your in-house clients are facing, so you can better advise and serve them. If your budget has been cut again – you are not alone. Take a look at the stats on page 21 that show IP budgets are still under pressure. More importantly, consider the list of approaches on page 25 showing how others have tried to do more with less. -
Webinar: Translation Memory and Machine Translation
Legal Services National Technology Assistance Project www.lsntap.org Webinar: Translation Memory and Machine Translation Jillian Theil, Claudia Johnson, Diana Glick, Leland Sampson, Maria Mindlin and Sart Rowe Machine Translation The Perils of Google Translate Typically Google translate tool will give you broken language translations. You might be able to tell what the translation is saying but it will be grammatically incorrect and use wrong words. The key when creating something like a sign, is to use more visuals and less words. Arrow signs, people icons, Dollar signs etc. Check for existing resources - look for signs that already exist and you can see what they are doing. Consider using visuals for wayfinding - arrows, etc Conduct Plain language review and editing Ensure your signage is readable (font etc) Back translation is running a translation back into english to ensure it is correct. Case Study: Using chinese as an example: the word for computer mouse is a different word than the animal mouse - so google translate will translate a sentence about this wrong. If possible obtain a legal review of the translation from an attorney / translator. Is it Ever OK to use Google Translate? It’s ok for informal communications, for general understanding or when you are in a complete bind and have no other options. Translation Workflow for Lingotek and People’s Law Library 1. Volunteer contacts them, and they qualify that volunteer 2. The volunteer selects an article to translate and that article is uploaded to lingotek 3. The volunteer performs the actual translation and then the article is assigned to a volunteer reviewer who is a licensed attorney 4. -
Table of Contents
User Guide Copyright © Wordfast, LLC 2019. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Release Notes Summary........................................................................................................................................ 7 New Features....................................................................................................................................................7 Improvements....................................................................................................................................................7 Fixed Issues...................................................................................................................................................... 7 1 About this Guide................................................................................................................................................ 9 Conventions.......................................................................................................................................................9 Typographical............................................................................................................................................ 9 Icons.......................................................................................................................................................... 9 2 About Wordfast Pro......................................................................................................................................... 10 3 Get Started....................................................................................................................................................... -
The Top 100 Language Service Providers: 2013 by Donald A
This six-page extract from “The Language Services Market: 2013” is subject to Common Sense Advisory’s standard terms of use. Unauthorized reproduction and distribution are strictly prohibited. The Top 100 Language Service Providers: 2013 by Donald A. DePalma and Vijayalaxmi Hegde This brief presents the world’s leading providers of translation, localization, and interpreting services. Because there were several instances of companies reporting identical revenue, the list includes three ties, resulting in 103 companies claiming or sharing the top 100 spots (see Table 1). The two-letter country codes listed correspond to ISO 3166-1 alpha 2, the most commonly used abbreviations. Company HQ Country Status 1 Lionbridge Technologies US Public 2 HP ACG FR Public 3 TransPerfect / Translations.com US Private 4 SDL UK Public 5 LanguageLine Solutions US Private 6 euroscript international S.A. LU Private 7 STAR Group CH Private 8 Welocalize, Inc. US Private 9 RWS Group UK Public 10 ManpowerGroup Solution – Language Services US Public 11 CLS Communication CH Private 12 Honyaku Center Inc. JP Public 13 YAMAGATA INTECH Corporation JP Private 14 Moravia CZ Private 15 thebigword Group UK Private 16 Pactera Technology International Ltd CN Public 17 Hogarth Worldwide UK Private 18 Semantix SE Private 19 Logos Group IT Private 20 CyraCom International, Inc. US Private 21 ONCALL Language Services Pty Ltd AU Private Copyright © 2013 by Common Sense Advisory, Inc. 31 May 2013 Unauthorized Reproduction & Distribution Prohibited www.commonsenseadvisory.com The Top 100 Language Service Providers: 2013 2 Company HQ Country Status 22 KERN Global Language Services DE Private 23 Språkservice Sverige AB SE Private 24 CSOFT International, Ltd. -
Read Our 2019 Benefit Corporation Report
2019 BENEFIT CORPORATION REPORT 2019 Benefit Corporation Report | 1 Dear Friends, I am delighted to share with you our 2019 Benefit Corporation Report—our third since becoming a New York State Benefit Corporation in 2017. A benefit corporation is one that has legally committed to higher standards of purpose, accountability and transparency. For EILEEN FISHER, this means we are designing clothing with minimal environmental and social harm; creating an inclusive workplace; empowering women and girls, supporting the fair treatment of all people and preserving the environment; and advancing ethical business practices through collaborations in the fashion industry. In 2019, we continued our VISION2020 work toward greater environmental sustainability and human well-being within our supply chain. We also introduced our new grant program, “Supporting Women in Environmental Justice.” And we embarked upon a new Diversity and Inclusion initiative to build a stronger workplace culture for our employees and customers. As we enter a new decade, we remain committed to conducting “business as a movement.” If you have any comments or questions, please direct them to [email protected]. Thank you, 2019 Benefit Corporation Report | 2 Our Purpose We design for simplicity and wholeness—to inspire joy and connection in women around the world. Our Values • We are authentic. • We thrive in connection. • We trust each other. • We innovate through creativity. • We are committed to the health of the whole. • We are united by purpose. 2019 Benefit Corporation Report | 3 Benefit 1 We are committed to designing clothing that creates minimal environmental and social impact. 2019 Benefit Corporation Report | 4 Materials We aim to use sustainable materials in 100% of our products. -
2.7 Announcement
NOT FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION IN WHOLE OR IN PART, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY IN, INTO OR FROM ANY JURISDICTION WHERE TO DO SO WOULD CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF THE RELEVANT LAWS OR REGULATIONS OF THAT JURISDICTION. THIS ANNOUNCEMENT IS DEEMED BY RWS AND SDL TO CONTAIN INSIDE INFORMATION AS STIPULATED UNDER THE MARKET ABUSE REGULATION NO 596/2014. UPON THE PUBLICATION OF THIS ANNOUNCEMENT VIA A REGULATORY INFORMATION SERVICE, THIS INSIDE INFORMATION IS NOW CONSIDERED TO BE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. THIS ANNOUNCEMENT IS AN ADVERTISEMENT AND NOT A PROSPECTUS OR PROSPECTUS EQUIVALENT DOCUMENT AND INVESTORS SHOULD NOT MAKE ANY INVESTMENT DECISION IN RELATION TO THE NEW RWS SHARES EXCEPT ON THE BASIS OF INFORMATION IN THE SCHEME DOCUMENT AND THE RWS CIRCULAR WHICH ARE PROPOSED TO BE PUBLISHED IN DUE COURSE. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 27 August 2020 Recommended All-Share Combination of RWS Holdings plc (“RWS”) and SDL plc (“SDL”) Creating the world’s leading language services and technology group The RWS Board and the SDL Board are pleased to announce that they have reached agreement on the terms of a recommended all-share combination of RWS and SDL, pursuant to which RWS will acquire the entire issued and to be issued share capital of SDL, to be effected by means of a court-sanctioned scheme of arrangement between SDL and SDL Scheme Shareholders under Part 26 of the Companies Act (the “Combination” to form the “Combined Group”). The Combination will create a truly global provider of language services and technology. The Combined Group will be a broad-based, well-funded business benefitting from increased scale, superior capabilities, an expanded geographic footprint and a highly experienced management team. -
Use of E-Learning in the Training of Professionals in the Knowledge Society
Use of E-learning in the Training of Professionals in the Knowledge Society University of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Ethnology and Sciences of Education in Cieszyn Use of E-learning in the Training of Professionals in the Knowledge Society Monograph Scientific Editor Eugenia Smyrnova-Trybulska Cieszyn - Katowice 2010 Reviewer Maciej Tanaś © Copyright by University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland, 2010 ISBN: 978-83-60071-30-4 Printing and binding: Publisher: Katowice – Rybnik http://www.studio-noa.pl for University of Silesia in Katowice Faculty of Ethnology and Sciences of Education in Cieszyn TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 9 I. Theoretical and Methodical Aspects of Distance Learning 13 Antonio Dos Reis (Portugal) E-Learning –The E-Volution…………………………..……………. 13 Jana Šarmanová, Kateřina Kostolányová, Ondřej Takács (Czech Republic) Intelligent Virtual Teacher ………………………………………….. 33 Halina Widła, Izabela Mrochen, Ewa Półtorak (Poland) Development of Education with the Use of ICT (Information and Communication Technologies) Implemented in Modern Foreign Language Studies .………………………….………………………… 47 Leszek Rudak (Poland) Spot-The-Difference – Traditional Education Vs. E-Education…… 75 Antoni Pardała (Poland) Methods of Mathematics Teaching vs. Distance Education ……..... 91 Jana Šarmanová, Kateřina Kostolányová (Czech Republic) Methodology for Creating Adaptive Teaching Support…………….. 105 II. Practical Aspects of Distance Learning. Distance Learning and Lifelong Learning:………………………………… 117 Franz Feiner, Anton Lanz (Austria) The Concept of EPICT (European Pedagogical ICT Licence) and the Implementation in Austria, KPH Graz………….......…….……. 117 Eugenia Smyrnova-Trybulska (Poland) Use of Distance Learning in the Training of Professionals in the Knowledge Society……………………………………………………. 137 6 Table of Contents Anita Dąbrowicz-Tlałka, Hanna Guze (Poland) Supporting First Year Students Through Blended-Learning - Planning Effective Courses and Learner Support…………...……. -
RWS Holdings Plc Results for the Year Ended 30 September 2020 A
For immediate release 10 December 2020 RWS Holdings plc Results for the year ended 30 September 2020 A resilient full year performance, in line with market expectations RWS Holdings plc ("RWS", "the Group"), the world's leading provider of language services and language technology, today announces its final results for the year ended 30 September 2020. Financial highlights 2020 2019 Change Revenue £355.8m £355.7m +0.02% Adjusted profit before tax1 £70.2m £74.2m -5.5% Profit before tax £58.7m £57.7m +1.7% Adjusted earnings per share1 19.9p 21.3p -6.6% Basic earnings per share 16.9p 16.5p +2.4% Dividend Proposed final 7.25p 7.00p +3.6% Total for year 9.00p 8.75p +2.9% Cash conversion2 100.1% 94.6% Net debt1 £15.1m £36.8m -41.2% 1 RWS uses adjusted results as key performance indicators as the Directors believe that these provide a more consistent measure of operating performance by adjusting for acquisition related charges and significant one-off or non-cash items. Adjusted operating profit is stated before interest, amortization of acquired intangibles, share based payment expense, acquisition costs and exceptional items. Adjusted profit before tax is stated before amortization of acquired intangibles, share based payment expense, acquisition costs and exceptional items. Adjusted earnings per share adjusts for amortization of acquired intangibles, share based payment expense, acquisition costs and exceptional items, net of any associated tax effects. Net debt comprises loans less cash and cash equivalents excluding lease liabilities. 2 Cash conversion is free cash flow expressed as a percentage of Adjusted net income. -
The 2016 Global Patent & IP Trends Indicator
Front cover Offices worldwide in North America, Europe & APAC. The 2016 Global Patent & IP Trends Indicator An in-depth look at the foreign filing strategies of U.S. and European patent owners Inside front cover Text page 1 The Global Patent & IP Trends Indicator is an annual report issued by RWS inovia, the global leader in foreign patent filing, IP translations and search services. Now in its seventh year, the Indicator is a go-to resource for identifying the trends having the greatest impact on the foreign filing strategies of patentees around the world. The survey was conducted by RWS inovia in May 2016 and includes responses from over 100 companies and universities in the United States and Europe. The IP Indicator has become a benchmark report in the patent industry, providing insight and guidance for those looking to file internationally. This report summarizes the results and trends identified in those that participated. Contents Introduction 1 2015 in review 3 Foreign filing & global outlook 6 IP budgets & workflow changes 12 Outlook for 2016 16 Text page 1 Introduction Respondents represent a diverse range of industries and sizes from small businesses filing a single patent family to multinational corporations filing more than 1,000 patents in 2015. All respondents share one common thread and are involved in the strategy and planning of patent filing activities at their respective organizations. Job functions range from Head of Global Patent Operations to General Counsel to CEO. Respondent overview 68% 32% U.S. respondents European -
Çì²ñò / Contents
Advanced Linguistics 4 / 2019 ISSN 2617-5339 DOI 10.20535/2617-5339.2019.4.189753 UDC 81.11’255.2:62 Valeriia Havrylenko Lecturer National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” Kyiv, Ukraine. ORCID ID 0000-0001-6873-093X [email protected] COMPARISON OF AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS OF TERMS’ EXTRACTION Abstract. Nowadays the processes of translation become more unified, and translators depend not only on their knowledge and sense of language, but also on various software, which facilitate the process of translation. The following article is devoted to one branch of such software, the systems of automatic extraction, which are an essential part in the process of lexicographic sources development of translation of text, which include a variety of terms. Consequently, the necessity to choose among the variety of different programs arose and the results of this research i.e. the comparison of functions of different programs, are described in our article. Several criteria, by which the quality of terms extraction can be measured, have been compared, e.g., the speed of extraction, the “purity” of the output list of terms, whether the extracted lexical material corresponded to the requirements to terms, the quality of irrelevant choices, extracted by automatic extraction systems, and the factors, influencing this quality, etc. The advantages and disadvantages of cloud and desktop services have been investigated and compared. It was noted that the main difficulty is that programs still are not able to distinguish between word forms, thus the texts that undergo the extraction process, require auxiliary procedures such as POS-marking, lemmatization and tokenization. -
Technical Requirements
Plunet BusinessManager Technical requirements (valid from 03.11.2020) AUTHOR Plunet GmbH Contents Technology 3 Database 3 SSL / https 3 Ports 3 Data security 4 System requirements 4 Plunet compatibility 6 Supported dynamic CAT versions (add-on modules available for purchase) 6 Supported file-based CAT versions (included interfaces) 10 Copyright Notice 11 Plunet BusinessManager: Technical requirements Page 2 of 11 Technology l Server: Servlet in the Java programming language l Client: HTML pages with JavaScript Database l The project data can be hosted on a separate server, independently of the database. l Plunet BusinessManager supports the following SQL database systems: MySQL, MS-SQL Server. o Licensing for on-premise MS-SQL: The customer needs to provide the required Microsoft SQL Server license. o Licensing for on-premise MySQL: The free MySQL Community Version can be used. If you require support for MySQL, you will need to purchase a license from Oracle o Licensing for hosting: The required licenses will be provided by Plunet. SSL / https l Client and server exchange data using http. l SSL is also supported (using https instead of http). l For security reasons, it is generally recommended to use https. This enables a secure encrypted connection between the server and client. Ports l The port for outbound connections can be freely defined. Port 80 is the default port. l Port 443 is the default port for encryption with SSL. Plunet BusinessManager: Technical requirements Page 3 of 11 l It may be necessary to enable further ports for the purpose of remote maintenance/support. Data security l Plunet BusinessManager data should be included in the customer’s general backup plan.