DOCSLIB.ORG

Socio-Economic Survey and Analysis to Identify Drivers of Forest Changes in Houay Khing and Sop Chia Village Clusters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Socio-Economic Survey and Analysis to Identify Drivers of Forest Changes in Houay Khing and Sop Chia Village Clusters Socio-economic Survey and Analysis to Identify Drivers of Forest Changes in Houay Khing and Sop Chia Village Clusters, Phonxay District, Luang Prabang January 2012 Vientiane, Lao PDR (left blank) Abbreviation and Acronyms CESVI Cooperazione e Sviluppo (Cooperation and Development) DAFO District Agriculture and Forestry Office GDP Growth Domestic Product GoL Government of Lao PDR GPAR Governance and Public Administration Reforms HH Household HK Houay Khing JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency MAF Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry MI Mekong Institute (Thailand) MoIC Ministry of Industry and Commerce MURC Mitsubishi UFJ Research & Consulting NGPES National Growth and Poverty Eradication NTFP Non-Timber Forest Product PADETC Participatory Development Training Centre PAFO Provincial Agriculture and Forestry Office PAREDD Participatory Land and Forest Management Project for Reducing Deforestation PDR Peoples’ Democratic Republic (Lao) PICO Provincial Industry and Commerce Office REDD+ Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation Plus SC Sop Chia TABI The Agrobiodiversity Initiative ToR Terms of Reference UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization VCA Value Chain Analysis i Table of Contents Abbreviation and Acronyms .................................................................................... i Chapter 1 Scope of the Survey ............................................................................... 1 1.1. Background .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Objectives ............................................................................................................................................. 2 1.3. Data and Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.4. Study Area: Houay Khing and Sop Chia Village Clusters ................................................................... 4 1.4.1. Land and People ............................................................................................................................. 4 1.4.2. Livelihoods .................................................................................................................................... 6 1.4.3. Road Access and Wage-labor ........................................................................................................ 6 Chapter 2 Household Samples and Survey Results ............................................. 8 2.1. Characteristics of Interviewed Households/Members .......................................................................... 8 2.2. Education .............................................................................................................................................. 9 2.3. Occupation ............................................................................................................................................ 9 2.4. Migration ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Chapter 3 Agricultural Land Use .......................................................................... 12 3.1. Historical Change in Land Size .......................................................................................................... 12 3.2. Land Size ............................................................................................................................................ 13 3.3. Rotational Periods of Upland Agricultural Plots ................................................................................ 16 3.4. Acquisition and Ownership of Agricultural Land .............................................................................. 18 3.5. Purposes of Agricultural Land Use .................................................................................................... 19 3.6. Access to Agricultural Land ............................................................................................................... 21 Chapter 4 People’s Perceptions about Livelihoods and Land and Forest Use ................. 22 4.1 Perception about Participation in Decisions on Land and Forest Uses ............................................... 22 4.2 Perception about Participation in Group Activities ............................................................................. 24 4.3 Perception About Forests and Forest Resource Use ............................................................................ 25 4.4. Perception About Values of Forest and Forest Resources .................................................................. 27 4.5. Perception About Livelihoods ............................................................................................................ 28 4.6. Perception about Quality of Life ........................................................................................................ 31 4.7. Alternative Livelihood Options .......................................................................................................... 32 Chapter 5 Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation .............................. 35 5.1. Socio-economic Situations ................................................................................................................. 35 5.2. Land Use............................................................................................................................................. 35 5.3. Perceptions about Collective Actions, Forest Resources and Livelihoods ......................................... 36 5.4. Potential Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation ................................................................ 37 5.4.1. Shifting cultivation/livelihood options ......................................................................................... 37 5.4.2. Demographic changes .................................................................................................................. 38 5.4.3. Market forces ............................................................................................................................... 39 ii Chapter 6 Conclusions .......................................................................................... 41 APPENDIXES .......................................................................................................... 46 iii (left blank) iv Chapter 1 Scope of the Survey 1.1. Background This study is part of the efforts of Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) to validate and register “Project on REDD+ through Participatory Land and Forest Management for Avoiding Deforestation in Lao PDR. Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR) established a REDD taskforce in 2008 under the assistance of JICA and other organizations to initiate an approach to addressing potential and technical challenges towards implementing REDD+ (or Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation Plus). REDD+, if effectively implemented in Lao PDR, it is expected not only to work as a global warming mitigation scheme but also to contribute to establishing a forest management system in the country’s villages, and eventually to reducing poverty and conserving environment on a global scale. To promote REDD+, JICA has been conducting a project called “Participatory Land and Forest Management Project for Reducing Deforestation” or “PAREDD” since 2009 and the Validation and Registration of REDD+ Project (called PAREDD+) is to have the Houay Khing Village Cluster (called “kumban” in Lao language) in Phonxay district of Lao PDR’s Luang Prabang province validated and registered as a target area of the REDD+ project.1 The field surveys of PAREDD+ has just began in Figure 1 Location of Phonxay Disatrict, Luang Prabang Province February 2012 and social- economic surveys in five villages of Houay Khing village cluster, and around five villages of Sop Chia village cluster as a Reference Area are to be implemented by an independent Subcontractor, Mitsubishi UFJ Research & Consulting (herein after referred to as “MURC”) appointed by JICA, in tandem with a local partner, NewEra+, (herein after referred to as “Subcontractor”) to identify the drivers of deforestation and forest degradation and develop suitable REDD+ Source: National Geographic Department activities by the methods of rural people participation. Furthermore, application for validation and registration as a REDD+ project will be prepared using data developed through the project. 1 Phonxay district is one of the 4 poorest districts in Luang Prabang province and one of the ten priority poorest districts in the whole country. It shares borders with Pakseng district in the north, Phoukhoun and Xieng Ngeun district, Viengthong (Huaphan province) and Phoukood (Xiengkuang province) in the east, Luang Prabang town and Pak Ou district in the west. 1 1.2. Objectives The main objective of this survey is to conduct the socio-economic survey and analysis to contribute to the efforts in identifying drivers of deforestation and forest degradation, and developing suitable REDD+ activities of rural people participation. 1.3. Data and Methodology The analysis presented in this report is based on primary data collected between October and December 2012 through a variety of methods. The secondary data, figures, and reports were collected and reviewed. Following
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of the EC Cooperation with the LAO
    Evaluation of EC co-operation with the LAO PDR Final Report Volume 2 June 2009 Evaluation for the European Commission This evaluation was commissioned by: Italy the Evaluation Unit common to: Aide à la Décision Economique Belgium EuropeAid Co-operation Office, Directorate-General for Development and PARTICIP GmbH Germany Directorate-General for External Relations Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik Germany Overseas Development Institute United Kingdom European Institute for Asian Studies Belgium Istituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales Spain The external evaluation team was composed of Landis MacKellar (team leader), Jörn Dosch, Maija Sala Tsegai, Florence Burban, Claudio Schuftan, Nilinda Sourinphoumy, René Madrid, Christopher Veit, Marcel Goeke, Tino Smaïl. Particip GmbH was the evaluation contract manager. The evaluation was managed by the evaluation unit who also chaired the reference group composed by members of EC services (EuropeAid, DG Dev, DG Relex, DG Trade), the EC Delegations in Vientiane and Bangkok and a Representative of the Embassy of the LAO PDR. Full reports of the evaluation can be obtained from the evaluation unit website: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/how/evaluation/evaluation_reports/index_en.htm The opinions expressed in this document represent the authors’ points of view, which are not necessarily shared by the European Commission or by the authorities of the countries concerned. Evaluation of European Commission’s Cooperation with ASEAN Country Level Evaluation Final Report The report consists of 2 volumes: Volume I: FINAL REPORT Volume II: Annexes VOLUME I: DRAFT FINAL REPORT 1. Introduction 2. Development Co-operation Context 3. EC strategy and the logic of EC support 4. Findings 5. Conclusions 6.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT ICT Integration in Teacher Education
    저작자표시-비영리-변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는 아래의 조건을 따르는 경우에 한하여 자유롭게 l 이 저작물을 복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연 및 방송할 수 있습니다. 다음과 같은 조건을 따라야 합니다: 저작자표시. 귀하는 원저작자를 표시하여야 합니다. 비영리. 귀하는 이 저작물을 영리 목적으로 이용할 수 없습니다. 변경금지. 귀하는 이 저작물을 개작, 변형 또는 가공할 수 없습니다. l 귀하는, 이 저작물의 재이용이나 배포의 경우, 이 저작물에 적용된 이용허락조건 을 명확하게 나타내어야 합니다. l 저작권자로부터 별도의 허가를 받으면 이러한 조건들은 적용되지 않습니다. 저작권법에 따른 이용자의 권리는 위의 내용에 의하여 영향을 받지 않습니다. 이것은 이용허락규약(Legal Code)을 이해하기 쉽게 요약한 것입니다. Disclaimer Master’s Thesis of Arts ICT Integration in Teacher Education A Teacher Training Institute Case in Lao PDR 교사교육과 ICT 통합 라오스 교원양성기관 사례를 중심으로 February 2017 Global Education Cooperation Major Graduate School of Education Seoul National University Yikun You ABSTRACT ICT Integration in Teacher Education A Teacher Training Institute Case in Lao PDR Yikun You Global Education Cooperation Major The Graduate School Seoul National University Information and Communication Technology (ICT) integration in education has gained global popularity, yet, not much has been known about how ICT has integrated into teacher education in Lao PDR. This study applies UNESCO’s four stages continuum model and SEAMEO’s ten- dimension framework to make a comprehensive description of the situation of ICT integration in a teacher training institutes in Lao PDR, marking both the achievement and challenges. This study chooses Luang Prabang Teacher Training Colleges (LPB TTC) as the research site. It targets on collecting experience in regard of ICT of the pre-service teachers (PTs) and teacher educators (TEs).
    [Show full text]
  • ABP Inception Workshop Report November 2011
    Mainstreaming Biodiversity into Lao PDR’s Agricultural and Land Management Policies, Plans, and Programmes Project “Agro-Biodiversity Project” (ABP) Inception Workshop Report December 2011 ABP Inception Workshop Report November 2011 ii ABP Inception Workshop Report November 2011 Table of Contents Project Overview ......................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Acronyms and Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................iv PROJECT UPDATE...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Background ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Clarifications of terminology and concepts .............................................................................................................. 1 2.1 Biodiversity related issues .................................................................................................................................. 1 2.2 Conservation and sustainable use ....................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Participatory Forest and Land Use Planning – tool for agro-biodiversity management ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mainstreaming Biodiversity in Lao PDR's Agricultural and Land
    Mainstreaming Biodiversity in Lao PDR’s Agricultural and Land Management Policies, Plans and Programmes Lao PDR GEF Agency: United Nations Development Programme Executing Partners: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry GEF Biodiversity Focal Area GEF Project ID: 2416 UNDP PIMS: 2903; UNDP Atlas Project Number: 00075435 Mid-term Review Report July 25, 2014 Source: ABP project presentation on integrated pest management. Mainstreaming Biodiversity in Lao PDR’s Agricultural and Land Management Policies, Plans and Programmes UNDP Lao PDR Country Office Mid-term Review Josh Brann, International Consultant, [email protected] Athsaphangthong Munelith, National Consultant, [email protected] Table of Contents I. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Implementation and Execution Issues ................................................................................................................. 4 Technical Focus .................................................................................................................................................... 5 II. Lao ABP Project Mid-term Review Approach ............................................................................................................ 8 A. Mid-term Review Purpose and Objectives ....................................................................................................... 8 B. Mid-term Review Scope ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phonesay District Agro-Ecosystems Analysis
    LSUAFRP Field Report No 2004/05 Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute Draft Report on Phonesay District Agro-ecosystems Analysis Luang Prabang Province Land Management Component - Soils Survey and Land Classification Centre Lao Swedish Upland Agriculture and Forestry Research Programme August, 2004 Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute LSUAFRP Field Report No. 2004/05 Draft Report on Phonesay District Agro-ecosystems Analysis Luang Prabang Province Land Management Component - Soils Survey and Land Classification Centre August 2004 Lao-Swedish Upland Agriculture and Forestry Research Programme Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ...................................................................................1 1.1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 1.2 PARTICIPANTS IN PILOT AEA ACTIVITY ..................................................................................1 1.3 AGRO-ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS PROCESS ...................................................................................1 1.4 OVERALL PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES OF AEA.........................................................................2 2 AEA PROCEDURES AND METHODOLOGY ..........................................................................2 2.1 KEY OUTPUTS ...........................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Lao People's Democratic Republic Peace Independence Democracy Unity Prosperity Ministry of Health Department of Planning
    Lao People’s Democratic Republic Peace Independence Democracy Unity Prosperity Ministry of Health Department of Planning and Cooperation GMS Health Security Project Cross border checkpoint (Points of entry) survey report The department of communicable disease control of the ministry of health conducted the survey of the border checkpoints during the period of June to September 2019. The survey was to implement one of the activities of the annual operation plan 2019 supported by the health security project and funded by the Asian Development Bank (ADB). The overall objectives of the survey were to have the information about the operation and the capacity of the border checkpoints in meeting the core capacity of the International Health Regulation for the public health emergency operation. Specific objectives were to: Map out the location/site of each checkpoint Assess the availability of health facilities, equipment, numbers of health staff and location of health checking counter and SOP Collect the information of traffic volume crossing the border checkpoints Assess the preparedness and response capacity at the PoE See the gaps, constraints and make the recommendation for an improved capacity in disease outbreak control at the border checkpoint I. Border checkpoints in the survey: A totally 27 selected points of entry surveyed which included 4 international airports, 23 ground crossing points and 3 local traditional checkpoints shown in the table below: No. Province District Check point name Shared border Sikhottabong Wattai International
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Wildlife Use by Northern Laos Nationals
    animals Article An Assessment of Wildlife Use by Northern Laos Nationals Elizabeth Oneita Davis * and Jenny Anne Glikman San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, 15600 San Pasqual Valley Rd, Escondido, CA 92026, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 17 March 2020; Accepted: 8 April 2020; Published: 15 April 2020 Simple Summary: Although unsustainable wildlife consumption is a leading threat to biodiversity in Southeast Asia, there is still a notable lack of research around the issue, particularly into which animals may be “on the horizon” of impending conservation concern. Using semistructured interviews, we investigated the consumption of wildlife in northern Laos, with a focus on the use of wildlife for medicinal purposes. Bear bile was the most popular product, but serow bile was second in popularity and used for similar ailments. In light of these results, and considering the vulnerability of both bear and serow populations in the wild, greater concern needs to be taken to reduce demand for these products, before this demand becomes a significant conservation challenge. Abstract: Unsustainable wildlife trade is a well-publicized area of international concern in Laos. Historically rich in both ethnic and biological diversity, Laos has emerged in recent years as a nexus for cross-border trade in floral and faunal wildlife, including endangered and threatened species. However, there has been little sustained research into the scale and scope of consumption of wildlife by Laos nationals themselves. Here, we conducted 100 semistructured interviews to gain a snapshot of consumption of wildlife in northern Laos, where international and in some cases illegal wildlife trade is known to occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of Supply/Demand Balance
    The Study on Power Network System Master Plan in Lao PDR Draft Final Report (Stage 3) Simulation of Supply/Demand Balance 17.1. Options for Power Development Plan up to 2030 In order to examine supply reliability and supply-demand balance based on the Lao PDR’s development situation, and considering the development status of the country’s power supply facilities and transmission facilities, a simulation is conducted for 2030. Laos’s power system is examined up to 2030 considering the demand situation in the domestic system and the expansion plans for transmission lines. The northern and central 1 areas are put together to form a Laos NC system, the central 2 a Laos C system, and the southern part an S system. Based on the results of the supply/demand balance simulations, we make recommendations for power plant expansion plans and transmission lines, and for interconnections with neighboring countries. Power Development Plan for Laos’ domestic system up to 2030 1. Power plants for analysis of supply/demand balance in Laos In examining the supply/demand balance for domestic demand in Laos up to 2030, we use the power plan approved by the MEM Minister (see Table 17.1-1). Table 17.1-1 Power Development Plan approved by minister of MEM, including existing plants No Power Plant MW Type COD Province Region 1 Nam Dong 1.00 Run of river 1970 Luangprabang NC 2 Nam Ngum 1 155.00 Reservoir 1971 Vientiane Pro NC 3 Nam Ko 1.50 Run of river 1996 Oudomxay NC 4 Nam Luek 60.00 Reservoir 2000 Saysomboun NC 5 Nam Mang 3 40.00 Reservoir 2004 Vientiane Pro
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Opium Poppy Survey 1999/2000
    LAO NATIONAL COMMISSION ON DRUG CONTROL AND SUPERVISION Annual Opium Poppy Survey 1999/2000 With the support of UNDCP – Laos and the Illicit Crops Monitoring Programme. Vientiane, October 2000 Table of contents Summary.......................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 I. The 2000 National Opium Survey............................................................................. 5 Objectives..................................................................................................................... 5 Methodology................................................................................................................. 5 The Baseline............................................................................................................. 5 The Random Sample................................................................................................ 5 The Interviews and Field Measurement.................................................................... 6 The opium growing farmers interview ....................................................................... 6 The field measurement ............................................................................................. 6 Organisation and Staff.................................................................................................. 7 Training .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Paper for the 10Th EU-Laos Human Rights Dialogue
    FIDH – International Federation for Human Rights and its member organization Lao Movement for Human Rights (LMHR) Briefing paper for the 10th EU-Laos Human Rights Dialogue 14 June 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 .… Political prisoners remain behind bars 2 .… Failure to cooperate with UN human rights mechanisms 3 .… Third UPR marks a step backward 3 .… Legislative elections fail to meet international standards 5 .… Freedom of expression stifled 6 .… Serious violations of religious freedoms persist 7 .… Negative impact of infrastructure and investment projects 11 .. COVID-19 affects infrastructure projects and their impact 12 .. Dam collapse survivors neglected There has been no improvement in the human rights situation in Laos in 2020-2021. Serious violations of civil and political rights, as well as social, economic, and cultural rights, have continued to occur and have remained unaddressed. This briefing paper provides a summary of key human rights developments during this period. Political prisoners remain behind bars Several individuals who have been imprisoned for the exercise of their right to freedom of opinion and expression remain behind bars. They include: • Ms. Houayheuang Xayabouly, aka Mouay, 32, who has been detained since 12 September 2019, is serving a five-year prison sentence on spurious charges under Article 117 of the Criminal Code (“Propaganda against the Lao People’s Democratic Republic”). Mouay is currently detained in Champasak provincial prison. • Mr. Somphone Phimmasone, 34, Mr. Soukan Chaithad, 37, and Ms. Lodkham Thammavong, approximately 35, who have been detained since March 2016, are serving prison sentences of 20, 16, and 12 years, respectively, on trumped-up charges under Articles 56, 65, and 72 of the Criminal Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty Alleviation for All
    FEBRUARY 2003 • ASIA DIVISION Laos Poverty Alleviation for all Contents Foreword by Sida ....................................................................................... I Preface ..................................................................................................... II Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................. 5 1.0 Lao as a national language and culture .................................... 5 1.1 The Anthropology of development and development anthropology ............................................................................. 8 1.1.1 Traditional applications of anthropology ................................. 8 1.1.2 Anthropological views of development..................................... 9 1.2 What kind of anthropologhy to pursue in relation to development? .......................................................................... 10 1.3 Physical versus mental in research and analysis...................... 12 1.4 Finally, what is cultural change? ............................................. 14 Chapter 2 Upland population, density and land use ........................ 16 2.0 Population in relation to forests .............................................. 16 2.1 Demography in the uplands.................................................... 17 2.2 Ethnolinguistic composition .................................................... 25 2.3 Migration trends ..................................................................... 29 2.4 Conclusion .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chomphet Brochure Back A3
    6 Pha Ane Cliff 4 Ban Pak Ou Ban Muang Keo 7 Wat Pak Ou Way to Oudomxay Province 3 Elephant Camp Phone Travel Pak Ou District 5 Ban Huoay Mad Tham Ting Or Pak Ou Cave Indigo farm Manifa Elephant Camp Way to 1. Ban Xang Khong and Ban Xieng Lek MAP SYMBOLS Pak Ou Ban Xang Kong and Ban Xieng Lek are well known villages which 2 Ban Xang Hai produce Posa paper made from mulberry bark and also a style of silk weaving Airport which is very different from others in Laos. You can watch the villagers making 8 Ban Pak Seuang Posa paper (from mulberry bark) and weaving traditional textiles. You’ll see Boat pier Donkhoun Island Ban Viang Sa Vanh this paper around town at the markets, as menus in restaurants and a visit to Ban Xieng Lek and Ban Xang Khong gives you the opportunity to understand Bus Terminal Ban Sen Souk first-hand the way it is made. Ban Muang Kham Where are these villages? 3 kilometers to the north of Luang Prabang Petrol station Wat Khokphap , across the Nam Khan river. These villages can be reached by tuk tuk (though 9 Ban Pha O you will need to cross by the new bridge) and by bicycle (old bridge) or even on Restaurant Boat Terminal foot( bamboo bridge). After crossing the old bridge, turn first left and follow the Wat Nong Sa Keo road as it turns north along the Mekong River. You’ll see craft shops and probably Temple Ban Phon Sai the mulberry paper drying outside in the sun as you approach.
    [Show full text]