DOCSLIB.ORG

Mkhwebane in Fight for Her Professional Life

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mkhwebane in Fight for Her Professional Life Legalbrief | your legal news hub Friday 01 October 2021 Mkhwebane in fight for her professional life Advocate Busisiwe Mkhwebane is facing a battle for her professional life today following yesterday’s damning Constitutional Court judgment (see separate detailed report below) that, among other things, exposed her as having lied under oath, notes Legalbrief. Her critics are closing in on several fronts. Already she will know that two parties – the National Association of Democratic Lawyers (Nadel) and Accountability Now, a non-profit organisation – have called on the Legal Practice Council (LPC) to investigate her suitability to remain on the roll of advocates, and that political parties and civil society organisations want the parliamentary process to remove her from office expedited. Nadel called for her to step down immediately ahead of a LPC investigation into her fitness to remain on the roll of advocates. In a statement last night, Nadel said the Constitutional Court had ‘handed down a seminal judgment ... that signals the strength of the judicial system and comes at a critical juncture when serious concerns have been raised about the nature of the power that the Public Protector exercises and her ability to discharge the functions of her office without fear, favour or prejudice’. Noting the court found her conduct to have fallen short of the basic values, principles and standards required of her in a constitutional democracy, it says: ‘Mkhwebane has brought the office of the Public Protector into disrepute. Her conduct is incompatible with the high office that she holds. Nadel therefore calls on Ms Mkhwebane to resign immediately and for her conduct to be investigated by the LPC with the view to establishing whether she is fit and proper to remain on the roll of advocates.’ Accountability Now wrote to the LPC soon after the ruling, asking it to take note of the case, says a Fin24 report. ‘There are serious, final and unappealable findings reflecting on the honesty, integrity and competence of the Public Protector, who is a duly admitted advocate of the High Court,’ Advocate Paul Hoffman, a director at Accountability Now, said in the letter to the LPC. The Constitutional Court upheld the February 2018 order of the Gauteng High Court (Pretoria) for Mkhwebane to be personally liable for 15% of the SA Reserve Bank’s legal fees in the Absa/Bankcorp case. It also upheld the High Court’s decision that Mkhwebane had acted in bad faith. The majority judgment also found that Mkhwebane’s ‘entire model of investigation was flawed’ and that she was not honest about her engagements during the investigation. ‘Kindly confirm that the council is looking into the matter with a view to bringing an application for the striking off the roll of advocates of Ms Mkhwebane as part of its legislated disciplinary functions. We have copied her on this e-mail,’ Hoffman wrote. The court also ruled that the Public Protector ‘had put forward a number of falsehoods’ in the course of litigation, including misrepresenting under oath the economic analysis underpinning her Absa report. ‘As you know, it is intolerable that an officer of the court should be found to be lying on oath. Her response that the judgment of the court creates a bad precedent is contemptuous of the court and does her no credit,’ Hoffman told the Legal Practice Council. The LPC has not yet responded to the calls. Mkhwebane said on her office’s official Twitter account that the judgment set a precedent for all other Public Protectors and that it was not clear how the office would be able to do its work going forward without fear, favour or prejudice. However, notes a Business Day report, the majority judgment penned by Justices Sisi Khampepe and Leona Theron said that those concerns were ‘unwarranted’. ‘Personal costs orders are not granted against public officials who conduct themselves appropriately. They are granted when public officials fall egregiously short of what is required of them.’ Given that a Public Protector can be ousted on grounds of misconduct, incapacity or incompetence, this latest setback has given more ammunition to those who have called for Mkhwebane – who is in the midst of a battle with President Cyril Ramaphosa over her findings that he violated the Constitution by misleading Parliament over a donation from scandal-hit firm Bosasa – to be removed from office. Business Day quotes Lawson Naidoo, executive secretary of the Council for the Advancement of the SA Constitution, as saying Mkhwebane’s position is untenable after the judgment, as ‘she has basically been found to have lied to the court’. Her conduct meant that the LPC would have to consider whether she is still fit and proper to be an advocate, he said. Mkhwebane has been under fire since the Bankorp report was first set aside by the Gauteng High Court (Pretoria) in 2018, says Business Day. Her detractors were further emboldened in 2019 after the High Court set aside another report, on the Gupta-linked Vrede dairy farm scandal. The court, however, reserved judgment on the costs order pending the outcome of the Constitutional Court judgment. Mkhwebane’s critics have accused her of bias and involving her office in ANC factional battles. While she did not probe the involvement of former Free State agriculture MEC Mosebenzi Zwane and former Premier Ace Magashule in the Vrede farm case, she has been steadfast in pursuing cases against Ramaphosa and Public Enterprises Minister Pravin Gordhan, a key ally of the President and one of the most vocal critics of Jacob Zuma within the ANC during the latter stage of his presidency. The judgment will give Ramaphosa’s case against Mkhwebane a boost. Though he is yet to file court papers, notes TimesLIVE, in announcing his court action on Sunday, Ramaphosa said: ‘In failing to provide me with an opportunity to comment on proposed remedial action, the Public Protector has violated provisions of the Public Protector Act, the Constitution and principles of common law.’ This complaint will find support in yesterday’s judgment, which found that her ‘entire model of investigation was flawed' and that she 'failed to engage with the parties directly affected by her new remedial action before she published her final report'. A note of caution for those baying for her blood is introduced by Pierre de Vos in his analysis of the judgment on his Constitutionally Speaking blog. He says that although the judgment should make it impossible for Mkhwebane to continue in her job, the fact ‘that her tenure has become highly politicised, and because her removal will be fiercely resisted by the Zuma/Magashule/Malema faction, it is impossible to predict whether the National Assembly will remove her from office in accordance with section 194 of the Constitution’. He points out a failure to be frank and candid, as the court found, is judicial speak for lying, for being a liar, for acting in a dishonest manner, and for misleading the court. Noting the court found her conduct fell far short of the high standards required of her office, he poses the question: What is to be done? Says De Vos: ‘It is clear that the Constitutional Court judgment has destroyed the Public Protector’s credibility. Even in cases where the Public Protector acts in an honest and impartial manner, doubts about the veracity of a report will remain because of the reasonable apprehension of bias and incompetence created by the Constitutional Court judgment.’ He says many people in the Public Protector’s position would have resigned in an attempt to protect the office of the Public Protector against the inevitable lack of legitimacy and credibility. Some might also have resigned to try to save face. If the Public Protector chooses to stay on, it will fall to the National Assembly to remove her from office, although it might be hampered by at least two issues regarding the existing rules, which De Vos explains in his Constitutionally Speaking analysis. He concludes: 'If the Public Protector does not resign and if members of the National Assembly decline to remove her from office, the Public Protector will limp on like a badly wounded soldier. She will make regular public statements believed by few, write reports trusted by even fewer, and impose remedial action that will, predictably, be challenged in the courts while a group of people will continue to loudly sing her praises despite the fact that she is dishonest and incompetent (or perhaps because of it).’ On the parliamentary front, DA chief whip John Steenhuisen said the judgment proved Mkhwebane's failings ‘go much deeper than simple technical errors’, notes a News24 report. ‘Simply put, she is not fit to hold the office she occupies and is, in actual fact, grossly incompetent,’ Steenhuisen said in a statement. ‘A distinction must be drawn between the current incumbent of the Office of the Public Protector and the office itself. Nobody can argue that the current incumbent is, by any stretch of the imagination, a suitable occupant. The DA does, however, believe that every report produced by the office of the Public Protector should still be judged on its own merits. The DA will therefore write to the Speaker to request that our complaint regarding the Public Protector's fitness to hold office be expedited.’ He added that the DA would also study the judgment to determine whether perjury charges should be laid against Mkhwebane. The ANC's alliance partner, the SACP, also welcomed the ruling and reiterated its call that Parliament should ‘discharge its constitutional responsibilities, initiate an inquiry into her fitness to hold office on the basis of the damning court findings against her, and hold her to account for her untenable actions as detailed in the numerous court findings’.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Africa's Anti-Corruption Bodies
    Protecting the public or politically compromised? South Africa’s anti-corruption bodies Judith February The National Prosecuting Authority and the Public Protector were intended to operate in the interests of the law and good governance but have they, in fact, fulfilled this role? This report examines how the two institutions have operated in the country’s politically charged environment. With South Africa’s president given the authority to appoint key personnel, and with a political drive to do so, the two bodies have at times become embroiled in political intrigues and have been beholden to political interests. SOUTHERN AFRICA REPORT 31 | OCTOBER 2019 Key findings Historically, the National Prosecuting Authority The Public Protector’s office has fared (NPA) has had a tumultuous existence. somewhat better overall but its success The impulse to submit such an institution to ultimately depends on the calibre of the political control is strong. individual at its head. Its design – particularly the appointment Overall, the knock-on effect of process – makes this possible but might not in compromised political independence is itself have been a fatal flaw. that it is felt not only in the relationship between these institutions and outside Various presidents have seen the NPA and Public Protector as subordinate to forces, but within the institutions themselves and, as a result, have chosen themselves. leaders that they believe they could control to The Public Protector is currently the detriment of the institution. experiencing a crisis of public confidence. The selection of people with strong and This is because various courts, including visible political alignments made the danger of the Constitutional Court have found that politically inspired action almost inevitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Powers of the Public Protector: Are Its Findings and Recommendations Legally Binding?
    POWERS OF THE PUBLIC PROTECTOR: ARE ITS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LEGALLY BINDING? by MOLEFHI SOLOMON PHOREGO 27312837 Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree: Master of Laws (LLM Research): Public Law Study Leader: Professor Danie Brand Department of Public Law, University of Pretoria November 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………………….........................vii CHAPTER 1 Introduction…..…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..1 The Public Protector as a Chapter Nine Institution………………………………………………………1 Research problem………………………………………………………………………………………………………..2 Aims and objectives of study……………………………………………………………………………………….3 Research Methodology………………………………………………………………………………………………..3 Research Questions………………………………………………………………………………………………………4 Limitations…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Chapter Outline……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 CHAPTER 2 CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE OPERATIONS OF THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC PROTECTOR Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 The Constitutional provisions……………………………………………………………………………………..7 Meaning of “Appropriate remedial action’ as contained in the Constitution….…………..11 STATUTORY PROVISIONS REGULATING THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC PROTECTOR……...10 Section 6 of the Public Protector Act………………………………………………………………………….12 i Section 7 of the Public Protector Act………………………………………………………………………….17 Section 8 of the Public Protector Act………………………………………………………………………….19
    [Show full text]
  • Africa's Best Read
    AFRICA’S BEST READ January 3 to 9 2020 Vol 36 No 1 @ mailandguardian mg.co.za Illustration: Francois Smit 2 Mail & Guardian January 3 to 9 2020 Act or witness IN BRIEF – THE NEWS YOU MIGHT HAVE MISSED Time called on Zulu king’s trust civilisation’s fall The end appears to be nigh for the Ingonyama Trust, which controls more than three million A decade ago, it seemed that the climate hectares of land in KwaZulu-Natal on behalf crisis was something to be talked about of King Goodwill Zwelithini, after the govern- in the future tense: a problem for the next ment announced it will accept the recommen- generation. dations of the presidential high-level panel on The science was settled on what was land reform to review the trust’s operations or causing the world to heat — human emis- repeal the legislation. sions of greenhouse gases. That impact Minister of Agriculture, Land Reform and had also been largely sketched out. More Rural Development Thoko Didiza announced heat, less predictable rain and a collapse the decision to accept the recommendations in the ecosystems that support life and and deal with barriers to land ownership human activities such as agriculture. on land controlled by amakhosi as part of a But politicians had failed to join the dots package of reforms concerned with rural land and take action. In 2009, international cli- tenure. mate negotiations in Copenhagen failed. She said rural land tenure was an “immedi- Other events regarded as more important ate” challenge which “must be addressed.” were happening.
    [Show full text]
  • Advocate Busisiwe Mkhwebane Public Protector in the Public’S Perception? Report on the Public Protector’S First 100 Days in Office
    ADVOCATE BUSISIWE MKHWEBANE PUBLIC PROTECTOR IN THE Public’s PERCEPTION? Report on the Public Protector’s first 100 days in office 17/10/2016 - 24/01/2017 COMPILED BY AFRIFORUM Report on the Public Protector’s first 100 days in office Report TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Introduction 4 Legal basis 5 CV Adv. Busisiwe Mkhwebane 6 Objections by Opposition & Appointment 8 Media Statements & Reports – Timeline 8 Conclusion 13 3 Report Report on the Public Protector’s first 100 days in office INTRODUCTION The office of the Public Protector (PP) was created by the President would eventually approve the appointment. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996 as one of the instruments to create checks and balances and limit From a shortlist of 14 candidates, which included Judge the power of Parliament and the Government. The PP and Sharise Weiner, Judge Sirajudien Desai, Adv. Kevin Malunga, other Chapter 9 institutions were heavily debated during Adv. Nonkosi Cetywayo, Adv. Mhlaliseni Mthembu, Adv. the discussions around the adoption of the Constitution. Madibeng Mokoditwa, Adv. Mamiki Goodman, Prof. Narnia Their eventual inclusion in the Constitution was therefore a Bohler-Muller, Prof Bongani Majola, Ms Jill Oliphant, Ms victory for the South African people, although the first public Muvhango Lukhaimane, Ms Kaajal Ramjathan-Keogh, and protectors were relatively unknown and they were often Mr Willie Hofmeyr, Ms Busisiwe Mkhwebane eventually criticised for not performing their constitutional duties. emerged victorious, if one can call it that, and was appointed as the new Public Protector. With Thuli Madonsela transforming the office of the Public Protector from a rather unknown and almost insignificant This report aims to evaluate the new Public Protector’s state institution to virtual rock star status in South Africa first 100 days in office, starting from her first day at the through her handling of the Nkandla case and her state office on 17 October 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by Public Protector Adv. Busisiwe Mkhwebane
    Statement by Public Protector Adv. Busisiwe Mkhwebane during a meeting of the Portfolio Committee on Justice and Correctional Services on Tuesday, March 06, 2018 in Parliament, Cape Town. Honourable Chairperson, Dr. Mathole Motshekga; Honourable Members of the Committee; Ladies and gentlemen; Good morning! I appreciate the opportunity to appear before the Committee to offer the much needed clarity on matters that appear to have given rise to a sense of disquiet among Honourable Members and the public at large. In the same breath, I am grateful that this opportunity provides a platform for me to bring to the attention of the Committee a worrying state of affairs in my office that is threatening to hamper the delivery of services to the people of South Africa. The latter statement refers to conditions that have a potential to pose a serious threat to the realization of the vision that underpins all of my office’s operations. That is Vision 2023, an elaborate eight-pillared blueprint whose main thrust is to see to it that the services of this institution make a greater impact at the grassroots than ever before. I will come back to this point shortly. Honourable Chairperson and Members, my constitutional mandate aside, one of the things I undertook to put high-up on my priority list right at the beginning of my term of office was forging and nurturing mutually beneficial relations between my office and stakeholders. This was informed by the understanding that, although it is independent, my office is not an island. Its successes and failures depend on how strong the links are 1 between us and those that have a keen interest in the ever so important task entrusted to us.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Protector As a Mechanism of Political Accountability
    The Public Protector as a Mechanism of Political Accountability:CJ TCHAWOUO The Extent MBIADA of its ContributionPER / PELJ 2017 (20) 1 to the Realisation of the Right to Access Adequate Housing in South Africa CJ Tchawouo Mbiada* Abstract Pioneer in peer -reviewed, open access online law publications This paper is premised on the concept of political accountability which aims to hold accountable government for its action and or Author omission. Political accountability encompasses a number of mechanisms such as the judiciary and the ombudsman. Courts Carlos Joel Tchawouo Mbiada have been instrumental in enforcing the realisation of the right to access to adequate housing in South Africa. This paper argues, Affiliation however, that the judiciary is not the only enforcing avenue because other mechanisms of political accountability may also Labour Appeal Court, South Africa contribute to the realisation of the right to housing. The paper, therefore, explores the extent of the Public Protector's Email [email protected] contribution to the realisation of the right to access to adequate Date published housing. The paper then argues that it is through its functions that the Public Protector exercises its accounting role in the 28 May 2017 realisation of the right to access to adequate housing. The paper, however, cautions that the Public Protector is not an alternative Editor Prof C Rautenbach dispute resolution institution parallel to courts. But that the Public Protector complements the role played by courts by offering How to cite this article another medium through which such right may be realised. Tchawouo Mbiada CJ "The Public Protector as a Mechanism of Political Accountability: The Extent of its Contribution to the Realisation Keywords of the Right to Access Adequate Housing in South Africa" PER / Right to access to adequate housing; political accountability; PELJ 2017(20) - DOI judiciary; ombudsman; Public Protector; accountability; http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727- 3781/2017/v20n0i1382 enforcement and realisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Feeding the PP Her Info? • Who's Paying For
    AFRICA’S BEST READ July 26 to August 1 2019 Vol 35 No 30 @mailandguardian mg.co.za Protect us from this mess OWho’s feeding the PP her info? OWho’s paying for CR? OWho really has the power? Pages 3, 4, 5, 8 & 23 PHOTO: MADELENE CRONJÉ 2 Mail & Guardian July 26 to August 1 2019 INSIDE IN BRIEF NEWS Little red trolls stick ANC on horns of protector dilemma it to Hanekom NUMBERS OF THE WEEK One opposition party want to keep her and In a revelation that The estimated the other lose her, and the ANC is divided 3 was a shock to eve- death toll from The percentage of the ryone except former Hurricane Maria, Who breathes the worst air in SA? president Jacob South African Reserve 4which645 devastated Puerto Rico in Sep- Jo’burgers do! 6 Zuma — who sees Bank's legal fees public tember 2017. This week thousands of spies lurking every- protector Busisiwe Puerto Rican protesters took to the EFF off to court to support protector where at the best of Mkhwebane has been The party has applied to join the case 8 times — it emerged this 15% streets demanding the resignation of ordered to pay out of her past week that ANC parliamentarian and Governor Ricardo Rosselló over a tranche own pocket by the Constitutional Court Deviations dodge due process former Cabinet minister Derek Hanekom of leaked chat messages containing a The attorney general has found that plotted with the Economic Freedom Fighters joke about the dead bodies of the municipalities are making use of a process to bring down Zuma.
    [Show full text]
  • Mkhwebane Warns of Constitutional Crisis
    Legalbrief | your legal news hub Sunday 26 September 2021 Mkhwebane warns of constitutional crisis Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane has kept up the pressure on beleaguered President Cyril Ramaphosa, accusing his administration of failing to protect the people of SA by litigating against her. In other developments yesterday, it was revealed that she is now facing criminal charges and her own office has been asked to investigate her for maladminstration (see reports below). In an exclusive interview with EWN, Mkhwebane raised concerns about the relationship between her office and the Presidency, saying the legal battles between the two could lead to a constitutional crisis. The Public Protector faced off with the President in court over her remedial action involving Public Enterprises Minister Pravin Gordhan in which Ramaphosa is seeking to interdict the implementation of the remedial action pending Gordhan's review application. The President has also filed an application to review and set aside Mkhwebane's Bosasa report, which found Ramaphosa violated the Executive Code of Ethics by not declaring donations to his presidential campaign in 2017. Mkhwebane also lashed out at the country’s judges who have delivered damning rulings against her, telling them to be objective and 'play the ball and not the person'. The principle of ‘play the ball, not the person’ should be applied when dealing with matters investigated by her office, said Mkhwebane. ‘We need to have the rule of law in this country, play the ball and not the person. Be objective, deal with what the law is saying. Let's focus on facts and law, let's not go further and deal with the integrity of a person,’ Mkhwebane is quoted as saying in a News24 report on the EWN interview.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa Country Report BTI 2018
    BTI 2018 Country Report South Africa This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2018. It covers the period from February 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of political management in 129 countries. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2018 Country Report — South Africa. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2018. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Contact Bertelsmann Stiftung Carl-Bertelsmann-Strasse 256 33111 Gütersloh Germany Sabine Donner Phone +49 5241 81 81501 [email protected] Hauke Hartmann Phone +49 5241 81 81389 [email protected] Robert Schwarz Phone +49 5241 81 81402 [email protected] Sabine Steinkamp Phone +49 5241 81 81507 [email protected] BTI 2018 | South Africa 3 Key Indicators Population M 55.9 HDI 0.666 GDP p.c., PPP $ 13225 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 1.6 HDI rank of 188 119 Gini Index 63.4 Life expectancy years 61.9 UN Education Index 0.720 Poverty3 % 35.9 Urban population % 65.3 Gender inequality2 0.394 Aid per capita $ 25.8 Sources (as of October 2017): The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2017 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2016. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $3.20 a day at 2011 international prices. Executive Summary In the period under review, South Africa faced some of its most stringent economic-, social- and political challenges since its democratic transition in 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTITUTIONAL COURT of SOUTH AFRICA Cases CCT 232
    CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Cases CCT 232/19 and CCT 233/19 Case CCT 232/19 In the matter between: ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS Applicant and PRAVIN JAMNADAS GORDHAN First Respondent PUBLIC PROTECTOR Second Respondent BUSISIWE MKHWEBANE Third Respondent PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Fourth Respondent SPEAKER OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY Fifth Respondent MINISTER OF STATE SECURITY Sixth Respondent NATIONAL DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS Seventh Respondent NATIONAL COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Eighth Respondent VISVANATHAN PILLAY Ninth Respondent GEORGE NGAKANE VIRGIL MAGASHULA Tenth Respondent Case CCT 233/19 In the matter between: PUBLIC PROTECTOR First Applicant BUSISIWE MKHWEBANE Second Applicant and PRAVIN JAMNADAS GORDHAN First Respondent PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Second Respondent SPEAKER OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY Third Respondent MINISTER OF STATE SECURITY Fourth Respondent DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS Fifth Respondent NATIONAL COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Sixth Respondent VISVANATHAN PILLAY Seventh Respondent GEORGE NGAKANE VIRGIL MAGASHULA Eighth Respondent ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS Ninth Respondent Neutral citation: Economic Freedom Fighters v Gordhan and Others; Public Protector and Another v Gordhan and Others [2020] ZACC 10 Coram: Khampepe ADCJ, Jafta J, Madlanga J, Majiedt J, Mathopo AJ, Mhlantla J, Theron J, Tshiqi J and Victor AJ Judgments: Khampepe ADCJ (unanimous): [1] to [102] Jafta J (concurring): [103] to [117] Heard on: 28 November 2019 Decided on: 29 May 2020 Summary: Interim interdict — remedial action of Public Protector — separation of powers — appealability of interim interdicts — prospects of success — costs orders — applicability of Biowatch principle — personal costs orders — appealability of costs orders 2 ORDER On appeal from the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria, the following order is made: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa 2018 Human Rights Report
    SOUTH AFRICA 2018 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY South Africa is a multiparty parliamentary democracy in which constitutional power is shared among the executive, judiciary, and parliament branches. In December 2017 the ruling African National Congress (ANC) elected then deputy president Cyril Ramaphosa as party president. On February 14, then president of the country Jacob Zuma announced he would step down. Of February 15, the National Assembly elected Ramaphosa to replace Zuma. In 2014 the country held a largely free and fair national election in which the ruling ANC won 62 percent of the vote and 249 of 400 seats in the National Assembly. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces. Human rights issues included: unlawful or arbitrary killings by government agents; corruption; trafficking in persons; and crimes involving violence or threats of violence targeting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) persons. Although the government investigated and prosecuted officials who committed abuses, there were numerous reports of impunity. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary Deprivation of Life and Other Unlawful or Politically Motivated Killings There were reports that the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings. Police use of lethal and excessive force, including torture, resulted in numerous deaths and injuries, according to the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID), Amnesty International, and other nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). In August, three police officers in KwaZulu-Natal Province were arrested for torturing three men who had been detained for questioning regarding a homicide. One of the three detained men died from injuries inflicted by the officers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Politics of Accountability: How South Africa's Judicial Recognition of The
    A Politics of Accountability: How South Africa’s Judicial Recognition of the Binding Legal Effect of the Public Protector’s Recommendations Had a Catalysing Effect that Brought Down a President Stu Woolman* One of the crucial elements of our constitutional vision is to make a decisive break from the unchecked abuse of State power and resources that was virtually institutionalised during the apartheid era. To achieve this goal, we adopted accountability, the rule of law and the supremacy of the Constitution as values of our constitutional democracy. For this reason, public office-bearers ignore their constitutional obligations at their peril. This is so because constitutionalism, accountability and the rule of law constitute the sharp and mighty sword that stands ready to chop the ugly head of impunity off its stiffened neck.1 I CONSpiRACY IS THE POOR MAN’S CAUSALITY Nothing thrills the citizens of a country more than watching venal politicians fall from grace. US President Richard Nixon finally ran out of dirty tricks when investigative journalists ‘followed the money’ and discovered a slush fund and an entire team of miscreants picked to do his dirty work. After investigation by a special prosecutor, and on the verge of impeachment, ‘Tricky Dick’ departed in disgrace. Post-apartheid South Africa recently witnessed the ignominious end of its third elected President, Jacob Zuma. After being exposed and pilloried by the press, the Public Protector revealed the degree of his corruption in two scathing * Professor of Law and Elizabeth Bradley Chair of Ethics, Governance and Sustainable Development, University of the Witwatersrand. This paper owes a significant debt to my collaboration with Michael Bishop over the past 15 years and to conversations that we have had over the last year and a half.
    [Show full text]