DOCSLIB.ORG

Advocate Busisiwe Mkhwebane Public Protector in the Public’S Perception? Report on the Public Protector’S First 100 Days in Office

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Advocate Busisiwe Mkhwebane Public Protector in the Public’S Perception? Report on the Public Protector’S First 100 Days in Office ADVOCATE BUSISIWE MKHWEBANE PUBLIC PROTECTOR IN THE Public’s PERCEPTION? Report on the Public Protector’s first 100 days in office 17/10/2016 - 24/01/2017 COMPILED BY AFRIFORUM Report on the Public Protector’s first 100 days in office Report TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Introduction 4 Legal basis 5 CV Adv. Busisiwe Mkhwebane 6 Objections by Opposition & Appointment 8 Media Statements & Reports – Timeline 8 Conclusion 13 3 Report Report on the Public Protector’s first 100 days in office INTRODUCTION The office of the Public Protector (PP) was created by the President would eventually approve the appointment. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996 as one of the instruments to create checks and balances and limit From a shortlist of 14 candidates, which included Judge the power of Parliament and the Government. The PP and Sharise Weiner, Judge Sirajudien Desai, Adv. Kevin Malunga, other Chapter 9 institutions were heavily debated during Adv. Nonkosi Cetywayo, Adv. Mhlaliseni Mthembu, Adv. the discussions around the adoption of the Constitution. Madibeng Mokoditwa, Adv. Mamiki Goodman, Prof. Narnia Their eventual inclusion in the Constitution was therefore a Bohler-Muller, Prof Bongani Majola, Ms Jill Oliphant, Ms victory for the South African people, although the first public Muvhango Lukhaimane, Ms Kaajal Ramjathan-Keogh, and protectors were relatively unknown and they were often Mr Willie Hofmeyr, Ms Busisiwe Mkhwebane eventually criticised for not performing their constitutional duties. emerged victorious, if one can call it that, and was appointed as the new Public Protector. With Thuli Madonsela transforming the office of the Public Protector from a rather unknown and almost insignificant This report aims to evaluate the new Public Protector’s state institution to virtual rock star status in South Africa first 100 days in office, starting from her first day at the through her handling of the Nkandla case and her state office on 17 October 2016. To provide ample background capture report, the end of her tenure in 2016 left some large on the (new) PP, this report starts with a legal background shoes for her successor to fill. and her CV, followed by the objections raised by the Democratic Alliance during the selection process, and The process to determine who the next PP would be started her eventual appointment. The report then provides a on 24 May 2016, when the National Assembly appointed timeline-based overview of media statements by the an ad hoc committee to oversee the appointment process. office of the PP and media reports by independent media The committee was to scrutinise the nominations, shortlist outlets in order to provide insight into Adv. Busisiwe the candidates and interview those on the list in order to Mkhwebane’s actions during the period between 17 October eventually present their choice of candidate to Parliament. If 2016 and 24 January 2017, and the perception she has Parliament then endorsed the recommended candidate, the thereby created of herself. 4 Report on the Public Protector’s first 100 days in office Report LEGAL BASIS Powers and Functions further details regarding the establishment and appointment Section 181(1)(a) of Chapter 9 of the Constitution of the of the PP are outlined in the Public Protector Act 1994 (Act Republic of South Africa 1996 (the Constitution) makes No. 23 of 1994) (the Act), as amended by the Public Service provision for the establishment of the Public Protector (PP) Laws Amendment Act 1997 (Act No. 47 of 1997); the as a state institution in order to ‘strengthen constitutional Public Protector Amendment Act (Act No. 113 of 1998); the democracy in the Republic’. Subsection 2 of section 181 Promotion of Access to Information Act (Act No. 2 of 2000); further dictates that the PP is independent and subject only the Public Protector Amendment Act (Act No. 22 of 2003); to the Constitution and the law, that the office must be the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act (Act impartial and that it must exercise its powers and perform No. 12 of 2004); and the Determination of Remuneration its duties without fear, favour or prejudice. Subsection 3 of of Office-bearers of Independent Constitutional Laws section 181 states that other organs of state are to assist Amendment Act (Act No. 22 of 2014). and protect the PP through legislative and other measures in order to ensure its independence, impartiality, dignity and Section 1A of the Act deals with the establishment and effectiveness. Finally, subsections 4 and 5 of section 181 appointment of the PP and reads as follows: stipulate that no person or organ of state may interfere with (1) There shall be a Public Protector for the Republic. the work of the PP and that the PP is accountable solely to the National Assembly, to whom he or she must report on (2) The President shall, whenever it becomes activities and performance at least once every year. necessary, appoint a Public Protector in accordance with the provisions of section 193 of the With regard to the PP’s own functions and powers, section Constitution. 182(1) of the Constitution confers the following powers on the PP; namely to (3) The Public Protector shall be a South African citizen who is a fit and proper person to hold such (a) investigate any conduct in state affairs, or in the office, and who- public administration in any sphere of government, that is alleged or suspected to be improper or to (a) is a Judge of a High Court; or result in any impropriety or prejudice; (b) is admitted as an advocate or an attorney and (b) to report on that conduct; and has, for a cumulative period of at least 10 years after having been so admitted, practised as an advocate (c) to take appropriate remedial action. or an attorney; or These powers are explained and complemented, as per (c) is qualified to be admitted as an advocate or an section 182(2) of the Constitution, by additional powers attorney and has, for a cumulative period of at least and functions as determined by national legislation such as 10 years after having so qualified, lectured in law at sections 7 and 7A of the Public Protector Act 1994 (Act No. a university; or 23 of 1994). However, section 182(3) provides that the PP may not investigate court decisions. Subsections (4) and (d) has specialised knowledge of or experience, (5) of section 182 of the Constitution state that, in order for a cumulative period of at least 10 years, in the to perform its functions, the PP must be accessible to all administration of justice, public administration or persons and communities and that any report issued by public finance; or the office must be open to the public, unless exceptional circumstances, to be determined by national legislation, (e) has, for a cumulative period of at least 10 years, require the confidentiality of a specific report. been a member of Parliament; or Tenure and appointment (f) has acquired any combination of experience Whereas the Constitution determines in section 183 that the mentioned in paragraphs (b) to (e), for a cumulative PP is appointed for a non-renewable period of seven years, period of at least 10 years. further details regarding the establishment and appointment Whereas the Constitution determines in section 183 that the (4) The Public Protector shall not perform PP is appointed for a non-renewable period of seven years, remunerative work outside his or her official duties. 5 Report Report on the Public Protector’s first 100 days in office CV ADV. BUSISIWE MKHWEBANE Nationality: African, gender: Female Education University of South Africa School of Business Leadership 2010 Course work completed for master’s degree in Business Leadership (MBL) 2014 Research in progress Rand Afrikaans University (RAU) 1997 Qualification obtained: Diploma in Corporate Law (Company Law, Close Corporations) Rand Afrikaans University (RAU) 2002 Higher Diploma in Tax Law University of the North 1992 Qualification obtained: B.PROC University of the North 1994 LLB Mkhepula Secondary School 1992 Qualification obtained: National Senior Certificate (Matric) Professional experience immigration services within PRC; liaised with stakeholders within the mission and in PRC; identified immigration trends 02/07/2014 – Present Department of Home Affairs and patterns that pose a risk to South Africa and maximised Branch: National Immigration Services economic benefits to the RSA; was awarded merit award for Position: Director: Country Information and Cooperation performing management and adjudication tasks; facilitated Management establishment of visa facilitation office (outsourced office); Key performance areas: Provided strategic direction and was awarded a merit award for exceptional performance in leadership to the Directorate; developed and managed a 2012. framework to conduct research into the political, social, economic and cultural situation of countries from which 01/06/2005 – 01/09/2009 Department of Home Affairs persons who claim asylum in South Africa originate in order Branch: National Immigration Services to support the adjudication of asylum claims; identified Position: Director: Refugee Affairs sources of information and developed and formalised a 01/10/2009 – 31/03/2010 Department of Home Affairs framework of engagement with critical government and Branch: National Immigration Services civil society stakeholders for the sourcing and provision of Position: Acting Chief Director Asylum Seekers information; established, managed and updated a country- Management (ASM) of-origin information database; prepared and managed the Key performance areas: Managed asylum seekers Directorate’s budget; ensured compliance with human management centres in four provinces: Gauteng, KwaZulu- resources policies and prescripts; identified and managed Natal (Durban), Eastern Cape (Port Elizabeth), and Western risks within the directorate. Cape (Cape Town), and provided refugee services leadership 27/04/2010 – 01/07/2014 South African Embassy in the and strategic direction within immigration branch and Republic of China (PRC) centres in accordance with the Refugee Act, 1998.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Address by Public Protector Adv Thuli Madonsela at the University Of
    Address by Public Protector Adv Thuli Madonsela at the University of Witwatersrand’s Business School, in Johannesburg, on Thursday, April 25, 2013 “Active Citizens are Key to Good Governance” Program Director, Ms Iman Rappetti Professor Wendy Ngoma, Director of the Wits Business School Chairperson of the Johannesburg Press Club, Mr. Mixael de Kock; Professor Kalu Ojah, Deputy Head of the Wits Business School Deputy Chairperson of the Johannesburg Press Club, Ms. Amina Frense Former chairperson of the Johannesburg Press Club, Mr. Hopewell Hadebe; Distinguished from the academic community and the media; Ladies and gentlemen I am humbled and honoured to address this gathering. The media and academic community are important stakeholders in the work of my office, the Public Protector South Africa. I would like to thank the Johannesburg Press Club and the Wits Business School for the opportunity. Furthermore, the contribution of the media and the academic community in promoting public dialogue on the place and role of my office in our democracy as well as specific activities, including reports, can never be over emphasised. My team and I value public platforms of this nature as they contribute to our endeavours to ensure our services be accessible to all persons and communities in compliance with section 182(4) of the Constitution. The Public Protector Team is deeply indebted to the organisers of this event. Programme Director My engagement with you today focuses on the role of citizens in promoting good governance in state affairs. I hope you agree with me that in any democracy, “Active citizens are key to good governance”.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Kwazulu-Natal the African Ombudsman Research Centre
    THE UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL & THE AFRICAN OMBUDSMAN RESEARCH CENTRE (AORC), A RESEARCH AND TRAINING ARM OF THE AFRICAN OMBUDSMAN AND MEDIATORS’ ASSOCIATION - Cordially invite you to a webinar - REPORT WRITING SKILLS Report writing skills has been identified in AORC’s ongoing needs assessment as one of the training priorities required by African Ombudsman. In responding to this need, the AORC has planned a series of webinars for African Ombudsman and their staff. The upcoming webinars for African Ombudsman and staff will focus on practical measures that Ombudsman and their staff can use to improve their report writing skills. These webinars are an excellent opportunity to enhance the capacity of African Ombudsman throughout the continent in their tasks of preparing persuasive reports. They will also contribute to the development of skilled resources within the Ombudsman institutions to the benefit of each participating country and Africa as a whole. PLEASE CLICK ON THE RSVP LINK FOR THE SESSION YOU WISH TO JOIN. ENGLISH SESSION FRENCH SESSION DATE DATE FRIDAY, 14 AUGUST 2020 FRIDAY, 14 AUGUST 2020 TIME TIME 10H00 – 11H00 14H00 – 15H00 SPEAKER SPEAKER PROFESSOR THULI MADONSELA MRS ALIMA TRAORÉ FORMER PUBLIC PROTECTOR, SOUTH AFRICA FORMER MEDIATOR, BURKINA FASO FACILITATOR FACILITATOR ADVOCATE BUSISIWE MKHWEBANE HON. EDOUARD NDUWIMANA PUBLIC PROTECTOR, SOUTH AFRICA OMBUDSMAN, BURUNDI CLICK HERE TO RSVP FOR THE ENGLISH CLICK HERE TO RSVP FOR THE FRENCH SESSION SESSION CLICK HERE TO RSVP CLICK HERE TO RSVP Please note that there will be no live questions and answers due to time constraints. Participants may however submit relevant questions to Franky Lwelela ([email protected]) or Marion Adonis ([email protected]) by 10:00 on Thursday the 13th August 2020 or use the Q & A function during the webinar.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa's Anti-Corruption Bodies
    Protecting the public or politically compromised? South Africa’s anti-corruption bodies Judith February The National Prosecuting Authority and the Public Protector were intended to operate in the interests of the law and good governance but have they, in fact, fulfilled this role? This report examines how the two institutions have operated in the country’s politically charged environment. With South Africa’s president given the authority to appoint key personnel, and with a political drive to do so, the two bodies have at times become embroiled in political intrigues and have been beholden to political interests. SOUTHERN AFRICA REPORT 31 | OCTOBER 2019 Key findings Historically, the National Prosecuting Authority The Public Protector’s office has fared (NPA) has had a tumultuous existence. somewhat better overall but its success The impulse to submit such an institution to ultimately depends on the calibre of the political control is strong. individual at its head. Its design – particularly the appointment Overall, the knock-on effect of process – makes this possible but might not in compromised political independence is itself have been a fatal flaw. that it is felt not only in the relationship between these institutions and outside Various presidents have seen the NPA and Public Protector as subordinate to forces, but within the institutions themselves and, as a result, have chosen themselves. leaders that they believe they could control to The Public Protector is currently the detriment of the institution. experiencing a crisis of public confidence. The selection of people with strong and This is because various courts, including visible political alignments made the danger of the Constitutional Court have found that politically inspired action almost inevitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Powers of the Public Protector: Are Its Findings and Recommendations Legally Binding?
    POWERS OF THE PUBLIC PROTECTOR: ARE ITS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LEGALLY BINDING? by MOLEFHI SOLOMON PHOREGO 27312837 Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree: Master of Laws (LLM Research): Public Law Study Leader: Professor Danie Brand Department of Public Law, University of Pretoria November 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………………….........................vii CHAPTER 1 Introduction…..…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..1 The Public Protector as a Chapter Nine Institution………………………………………………………1 Research problem………………………………………………………………………………………………………..2 Aims and objectives of study……………………………………………………………………………………….3 Research Methodology………………………………………………………………………………………………..3 Research Questions………………………………………………………………………………………………………4 Limitations…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Chapter Outline……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 CHAPTER 2 CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE OPERATIONS OF THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC PROTECTOR Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 The Constitutional provisions……………………………………………………………………………………..7 Meaning of “Appropriate remedial action’ as contained in the Constitution….…………..11 STATUTORY PROVISIONS REGULATING THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC PROTECTOR……...10 Section 6 of the Public Protector Act………………………………………………………………………….12 i Section 7 of the Public Protector Act………………………………………………………………………….17 Section 8 of the Public Protector Act………………………………………………………………………….19
    [Show full text]
  • Africa's Best Read
    AFRICA’S BEST READ January 3 to 9 2020 Vol 36 No 1 @ mailandguardian mg.co.za Illustration: Francois Smit 2 Mail & Guardian January 3 to 9 2020 Act or witness IN BRIEF – THE NEWS YOU MIGHT HAVE MISSED Time called on Zulu king’s trust civilisation’s fall The end appears to be nigh for the Ingonyama Trust, which controls more than three million A decade ago, it seemed that the climate hectares of land in KwaZulu-Natal on behalf crisis was something to be talked about of King Goodwill Zwelithini, after the govern- in the future tense: a problem for the next ment announced it will accept the recommen- generation. dations of the presidential high-level panel on The science was settled on what was land reform to review the trust’s operations or causing the world to heat — human emis- repeal the legislation. sions of greenhouse gases. That impact Minister of Agriculture, Land Reform and had also been largely sketched out. More Rural Development Thoko Didiza announced heat, less predictable rain and a collapse the decision to accept the recommendations in the ecosystems that support life and and deal with barriers to land ownership human activities such as agriculture. on land controlled by amakhosi as part of a But politicians had failed to join the dots package of reforms concerned with rural land and take action. In 2009, international cli- tenure. mate negotiations in Copenhagen failed. She said rural land tenure was an “immedi- Other events regarded as more important ate” challenge which “must be addressed.” were happening.
    [Show full text]
  • Thuli Madonsela Citation
    CITATION: THULI MADONSELA Advocate Thulisile Madonsela was born in Johannesburg in 1962 and grew up in Soweto. Her parents, Bafana and Nomasonto, were traders and sent her to Evelyn Baring High School in Nhlangano, Swaziland, from where her family originates. After school, she worked as an assistant teacher from 1980 to 1983. Between 1984 and 1987 she worked as a legal and education officer at the Paper Printing Wood & Allied Workers Union, whilst also studying for a BA in law at the University of Swaziland. After graduating with a BA in 1987, she went on to complete an LLB at the University of the Witwatersrand in 1990. In 1992, Madonsela joined the Centre for Applied Legal Studies at Wits University as a Ford Foundation intern and then joined its Gender Research Project from 1993 to 1995. These were exciting times to be at CALS and Madonsela was particularly involved in labour law issues and in working with women in trade unions, as well as constitutional issues. Indeed, she was to forfeit a Harvard scholarship to remain engaged in South Africa on constitutional issues. She was appointed as a Technical Advisor of the Theme Committees in the Constitutional Assembly working on different aspects of the 1996 Constitution. She was also a member of a Task Team that prepared constitutional inputs for the Gauteng Province of the African National Congress, and presented the final constitutional document at the African National Congress' Gauteng Constitutional Conference in 1995. After 1994, Madonsela set up her own company to work on issues of gender and the law.
    [Show full text]
  • 12-Politcsweb-Going-Off-The-Rails
    http://www.politicsweb.co.za/documents/going-off-the-rails--irr Going off the rails - IRR John Kane-Berman - IRR | 02 November 2016 John Kane-Berman on the slide towards the lawless South African state GOING OFF THE RAILS: THE SLIDE TOWARDS THE LAWLESS SOUTH AFRICAN STATE SETTING THE SCENE South Africa is widely recognised as a lawless country. It is also a country run by a government which has itself become increasingly lawless. This is so despite all the commitments to legality set out in the Constitution. Not only is the post–apartheid South Africa founded upon the principle of legality, but courts whose independence is guaranteed are vested with the power to ensure that these principles are upheld. Prosecuting authorities are enjoined to exercise their functions “without fear, favour, or prejudice”. The same duty is laid upon other institutions established by the Constitution, among them the public protector and the auditor general. Everyone is endowed with the right to “equal protection and benefit of the law”. We are all also entitled to “administrative action that is lawful, reasonable, and procedurally fair”. Unlike the old South Africa – no doubt because of it – the new Rechtsstaat was one where the rule of law would be supreme, power would be limited, and the courts would have the final say. This edifice, and these ideals, are under threat. Lawlessness on the part of the state and those who run it is on the increase. The culprits run from the president down to clerks of the court, from directors general to immigration officials, from municipal managers to prison warders, from police generals to police constables, from cabinet ministers to petty bureaucrats.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by Public Protector Adv. Busisiwe Mkhwebane
    Statement by Public Protector Adv. Busisiwe Mkhwebane during a meeting of the Portfolio Committee on Justice and Correctional Services on Tuesday, March 06, 2018 in Parliament, Cape Town. Honourable Chairperson, Dr. Mathole Motshekga; Honourable Members of the Committee; Ladies and gentlemen; Good morning! I appreciate the opportunity to appear before the Committee to offer the much needed clarity on matters that appear to have given rise to a sense of disquiet among Honourable Members and the public at large. In the same breath, I am grateful that this opportunity provides a platform for me to bring to the attention of the Committee a worrying state of affairs in my office that is threatening to hamper the delivery of services to the people of South Africa. The latter statement refers to conditions that have a potential to pose a serious threat to the realization of the vision that underpins all of my office’s operations. That is Vision 2023, an elaborate eight-pillared blueprint whose main thrust is to see to it that the services of this institution make a greater impact at the grassroots than ever before. I will come back to this point shortly. Honourable Chairperson and Members, my constitutional mandate aside, one of the things I undertook to put high-up on my priority list right at the beginning of my term of office was forging and nurturing mutually beneficial relations between my office and stakeholders. This was informed by the understanding that, although it is independent, my office is not an island. Its successes and failures depend on how strong the links are 1 between us and those that have a keen interest in the ever so important task entrusted to us.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibian Influence, Impacts on Education, and State Capture
    THE EFFECTS OF COLONIZATION AND APARTHEID ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOUTH AFRICA: NAMIBIAN INFLUENCE, IMPACTS ON EDUCATION, AND STATE CAPTURE by Austin Michael Hutchinson A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Government Baltimore, Maryland May 2021 © 2021 Austin Hutchinson All Rights Reserved Abstract When discussing South Africa, apartheid is the most common topic that people remember. The legacies and institutional framework that apartheid established are still prevalent in the current state of development in South Africa. This work examines three prominent issues hindering the development of the South African nation. Understanding the narrative history of colonization and apartheid allows for a more comprehensive view on the current development of South Africa. Using colonial records, court rulings, journals, news articles among various other sources across the topics mentioned, a narrative is created that explains the current problems facing South Africa and Namibia. Namibia endured colonial rule from three different oppressors but was initially claimed by Germany and named German South West Africa. Although Namibia and South Africa were merged under one rule for nearly a century beginning in 1915, each nation had divergent paths to independence. Namibia eventually gained its independence in 1990, a few years prior to South Africa, which gained its own independence from apartheid rule in 1994. As a result of colonization and apartheid in South Africa, certain ideals which hindered the progression of the South African people remained, including inequities in the education system. Furthermore, some of the pervasive systems established under the apartheid regime led to failures in the accountability mechanisms which resulted in institutional weakness and state capture in South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Constitutional Democracy: Progress and Challenges of the South African Human Rights Commission and Public Protector
    NYLS Law Review Vols. 22-63 (1976-2019) Volume 60 Issue 1 Twenty Years of South African Constitutionalism: Constitutional Rights, Article 7 Judicial Independence and the Transition to Democracy January 2016 Strengthening Constitutional Democracy: Progress and Challenges of the South African Human Rights Commission and Public Protector TSELISO THIPANYANE Chief Executive Officer at the Safer South Africa Foundation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/nyls_law_review Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation TSELISO THIPANYANE, Strengthening Constitutional Democracy: Progress and Challenges of the South African Human Rights Commission and Public Protector, 60 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. (2015-2016). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Law Review by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL LAW REVIEW VOLUME 60 | 2015/16 VOLUME 60 | 2015/16 Tseliso Thipanyane Strengthening Constitutional Democracy: Progress and Challenges of the South African Human Rights Commission and Public Protector 60 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 125 (2015–2016) ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Tseliso Thipanyane is the Chief Executive Officer at the Safer South Africa Foundation; an independent consultant on human rights, democracy, and good governance; former adjunct Lecturer-in-Law at Columbia Law School; and former Chief Executive Officer of the South African Human Rights Commission. www.nylslawreview.com 125 STRENGTHENING CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL LAW REVIEW VOLUME 60 | 2015/16 Human rights and fundamental freedoms are the birthright of all human beings; their protection and promotion is the first responsibility of Governments.1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Betrayal of the Promise: How South Africa Is Being Stolen
    BETRAYAL OF THE PROMISE: HOW SOUTH AFRICA IS BEING STOLEN May 2017 State Capacity Research Project Convenor: Mark Swilling Authors Professor Haroon Bhorat (Development Policy Research Unit, University of Cape Town), Dr. Mbongiseni Buthelezi (Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI), University of the Witwatersrand), Professor Ivor Chipkin (Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI), University of the Witwatersrand), Sikhulekile Duma (Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University), Lumkile Mondi (Department of Economics, University of the Witwatersrand), Dr. Camaren Peter (Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University), Professor Mzukisi Qobo (member of South African research Chair programme on African Diplomacy and Foreign Policy, University of Johannesburg), Professor Mark Swilling (Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University), Hannah Friedenstein (independent journalist - pseudonym) Preface The State Capacity Research Project is an interdisciplinary, inter- that the individual confidential testimonies they were receiving from university research partnership that aims to contribute to the Church members matched and confirmed the arguments developed public debate about ‘state capture’ in South Africa. This issue has by the SCRP using largely publicly available information. This dominated public debate about the future of democratic governance triangulation of different bodies of evidence is of great significance. in South Africa ever since then Public Protector Thuli Madonsela published her report entitled State of Capture in late 2016.1 The The State Capacity Research Project is an academic research report officially documented the way in which President Zuma and partnership between leading researchers from four Universities senior government officials have colluded with a shadow network of and their respective research teams: Prof. Haroon Bhorat from the corrupt brokers.
    [Show full text]
  • Address by Public Protector Adv. Thuli Madonsela During the FW De Klerk Foundation Goodwill Award Ceremony in Cape Town, Western Cape on Monday, February 01, 2016
    Address by Public Protector Adv. Thuli Madonsela during the FW de Klerk Foundation Goodwill Award Ceremony in Cape Town, Western Cape on Monday, February 01, 2016. Programme Director; Former President FW De Klerk and Founder of the FW De Klerk Foundation; Ms. De Klerk; Premier of the Western Cape, Her Excellency, Ms Helen Zille; Their Excellencies, Members of the Diplomatic Corps; Academics; Distinguished guests; and Fellow people of South Africa Greetings from the Public Protector Team! It is with great humility and a deep sense of gratitude that I accept the Goodwill Award from the FW de Klerk Foundation. As with all the awards bestowed on me during my 6 years of being Public Protector, I accept this Goodwill Award on behalf of and with the understanding that the work being recognised is the collective contribution of the entire Public Protector Team. When we engage in team building and strategic conversations at my office, we always remind ourselves that it takes the contribution of every member of the Public Protector Team, including the contribution of corporate support staff regardless of nature of work or rank, to achieve a successful investigation and related work. 1 I also wish to reiterate that as the Public Protector Team, we do our work not in search of accolades or awards. We simply do the best we can to support and strengthen constitutional democracy by ensuring government treats all people and resources properly and that where a person or people have been wronged, the injustice or prejudice suffered is expeditiously remedied. On receipt of the letter advising me about and enquiring if I would accept the award, I pondered briefly the conversations this may spark.
    [Show full text]