Metrorail on Track Newsletter of the Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Metrorail on Track Newsletter of the Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project June 2018 Metrorail On Track Newsletter of the Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project Phase 2 Rail Construction Hits 78 Percent While the heavy rains of late spring have slowed some con- struction, Phase 2 of the Silver Line is about 78 percent com- plete as of late May. Phase 2 includes 6 stations: Reston Town Center, Herndon, Innovation Center, Dulles Airport, Loudoun Gateway and Ashburn. Herndon Station Parking Herndon Station: Construction of the Silver Line Phase 2 is more than three-quarters Garage Almost Complete of the way complete. Pictured here is Herndon Station, in the media of the Dulles Toll Road/Dulles International Airport Access Highway near the Herndon-Monroe Park and Fairfax County is building new parking garages to serve the fu- Ride. (Photo courtesy of Richard D. Adams, DCMP) ture Herndon and Innovation Metrorail stations. According to Fairfax transportation official Mark Bus Stop Repairs Nearly Finished at Tysons Stations Canale, the Herndon garage is 82 percent complete. Most of the ex- Road repairs at the bus stops serving the McLean and Spring Hill Metrorail terior is complete but electrical stations are almost done. This work requires riders of WMATA and Fairfax work and building interior spaces County buses to use different bus stops for several weeks. remain to be done. The pace of construction at the garage is Loudoun Gateway Work Hits Hard Rock ahead of schedule, but Canale said he did not expect the garage Construction of the Loudoun Gateway Station has slowed a bit because to open prior to the opening of all the contractor has hit some very hard rock which has required using a rock of Phase 2. Construction at the crusher, according to Loudoun County’s Alan Winn. Loudoun is building Innovation Center garage is 50 this facility along with two garages that will serve Ashburn Station. One of percent complete. the Ashburn garages is being built through public-private partnership be- tween the county and developer Comstock LLC, which is self-financing Old Meadow/Route 123 that garage. Loudoun has appropriated $84 million for the design and con- Improvements Planned struction of the other two garages. Construction previously hit other snags when workers encountered extremely hard rock elsewhere along the The Dulles Rail Project plan to Phase 2 rail alignment. improve the busy intersection of Old Meadow Road and Route 123 Innovation Ave. Closure Continues through September in Tysons Corner is being re- viewed, pending the outcome of a A temporary closure of the old Innovation Avenue alignment southeast of traffic analysis of possible impacts the Center for Innovative Technology (CIT) building has been extended during construction. As details until the end of September 2018 because of construction of the Innovation emerge, additional public meetings Center Station’s north pavilion, pedestrian bridge and associated utility with those who live and work in work. The closure is located between Greene Drive and the currently this area will be held. closed section of old Innovation Avenue. PRECAST CONCRETE UPDATE Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project offi- fied in its contract. (WMATA) which will eventually operate cials are awaiting results of microscopic That aggregate must be tested for Phase 2, will be doing its own investiga- testing of samples from precast concrete compliance with project requirements. tion. panels used in construction of five of the The unsealing of court documents Meanwhile, significant progress has six new Metrorail stations in Phase 2 of was the first time the Metropolitan been made on resolving previously iden- the Silver Line. Washington Airports Authority learned tified water penetration problems with The testing is being done following of the potential problems with the ag- precast concrete panels that threatened the mid-May release of allegations, un- gregate. the required 100-year durability of the sealed in federal district court in Alexan- The authority has hired Dulles Rail project. dria, saying there are problems with the Consultants, an independent entity, to A rail-mounted extraction machine, a stone aggregate used to fabricate the oversee a microscopic examination of large device custom-made to remove panels by Universal Concrete Corp. of four core samples from each of the five and replace panels that weigh as much Stowe, Pa. stations involved: Reston Town Center, as 24 tons, has been used by CRC crews The allegations came in a whistle- Herndon, Innovation Center, Loudoun to remove some panels at the Herndon blower lawsuit filed by a former employ- Gateway and Ashburn. and Innovation Center stations. ee at Universal saying that the concrete Results of those tests are expected in CRC has also committed to spraying company, a subcontractor for Capital late summer. That’s when MWAA offi- all station panels with a special sealant Rail Constructors (CRC), the main con- cials will make decisions on the next this summer and paying for future treat- tractor building Phase 2, used aggregate steps. In addition, the Washington Met- ments by WMATA as needed every 10 from a quarry other than the one speci- ropolitan Area Transit Authority years. Did you know? The north pedestrian bridge at Loudoun Gateway is the longest on Phase 2 at 377 feet The shortest is the Reston Metrorail Station’s south pe- destrian bridge at 179 feet Virginia Secretary of Trans- Here’s a view looking east from the Innovation Center Station portation Shannon Valentine platform in the median of the Dulles Toll Road. (Courtesy of toured the project in May Amanda Scarangella, Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project) Contact the Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project’s Communications and Follow us on Outreach Office at 703-572-0506 or [email protected]. To Twitter report construction concerns, call the Project Hotline at @DullesMetrorail 1-844-385-7245. .
Recommended publications
  • Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project Silver Line Phase 2 Implementation Board Transportation Committee Update December 10, 2019
    Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project Silver Line Phase 2 Implementation Board Transportation Committee Update December 10, 2019 Yuqing Xiong, Special Project Division Fairfax County Department of Transportation Project Status Phase 1 • Old Meadow Road Realignment – 100% design complete. • Utility relocation underway; two utilities remain • Roadway construction to resume in Spring 2020 • VDOT Punch List Ongoing – MWAA to complete • Phase 1 Close out - $2.982B (no change) Phase 2 Old Meadow Rd • Overall Phase 2 – 97% complete • Package A (Rail, System & Stations) – 97% • Package B (Rail yard at Dulles) – 97% 2 Project Status Phase 2 (continued) • General Activities • Dynamic testing – Ongoing • Property conveyances and maintenance agreements – Final Review • Site inspections and walkdowns – Ongoing Old Meadow Rd • Wiehle Reston East Station scheduled shutdowns for testing of Phase 2 • November 23/ 24 2019 – Completed • November 30/ December 01 2019 – Completed • All weekends in December 2019 and January 2020 – Approved by WMATA • MWAA and WMATA identified concerns - Discussions on remediation are ongoing • Concrete Panel Deficiencies • Fouled Ballast at Dulles Rail Yard • Concrete Ties/Cross-Level Deficiencies 3 Project Status Phase 2 (continued) • Construction Status • Civil - Utilities relocation work completed; paving operations, stormwater management ponds, storm drains ongoing • Stations – Interior finishes, station clean up, elevator and escalator testing, and lighting installation and other electrical work ongoing • Track – Clean-up
    [Show full text]
  • Parking Ordinance Revisions
    County of Fairfax, Virginia Parking Ordinance Revisions Board Transportation Committee February 7, 2017 Neil Freschman Chief, Traffic Engineering Section Fairfax County Department of Transportation Department of Transportation 1 County of Fairfax, Virginia Purpose of Briefing • To secure Board feedback on proposed changes to parking regulations Department of Transportation 2 County of Fairfax, Virginia Background • September 2013 - Request was made by the Board to review the “Parking” section of the Fairfax County Ordinance, Chapter 82, Article 5 to account for new technology, parking management and community needs as the County urbanizes. • February 2014 - A list of parking issues to be considered was distributed to each Supervisor office. • Spring 2014 - Proposed ordinance revisions were discussed with Board aides from each district. • Spring 2014 to July 2016 – FCDOT worked with the Office of the County Attorney and Fairfax County Police to develop proposed ordinance revisions. • October 2016 – Proposed ordinance changes presented to the Board Transportation Committee (BTC), who provided additional comments. Department of Transportation 3 County of Fairfax, Virginia Issues 1. Commercial vehicles are parking across the street from residential areas. 2. There are a variety of “pay for parking” methods available, but the current ordinance only accommodates coin operated parking meters. 3. Businesses are storing fleets of vehicles on public streets. 4. Police have difficulty enforcing existing ordinance because “unattended” is not specifically defined. 5. People living in vehicles on public streets. 6. Vehicle repair and maintenance occurring within the public right-of- way. Department of Transportation 4 County of Fairfax, Virginia Issue: Commercial vehicles are parking across the street from residential areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Comment Letters
    Virginia Sierra Club Comments on Northern Virginia Transportation Authority 2015‐16 Plan March 23, 2015 The Virginia Sierra Club supports the development of a balanced transportation system that expands our transportation choices. We have seen in Northern Virginia that when there is a steady investment in multi-modal systems, a far higher share of trips are made by bicycling, walking and transit, and traffic congestion has not increased even with economic and population growth. We appreciate the deliberate and transparent manner in which NVTA has developed the criteria for rating road and transit projects. However, we believe that NVTA’s current project evaluation, prioritization and selection processes overlook the value of expanding mode choices and improving accessibility within and between activity centers. Highway and arterial expansion can lead to temporary congestion relief, but induced traffic quickly refills the expanded capacity. It is transit and transit-oriented development that offer the best long-term transportation approach because they maximize transit, walking and bike trips, and reduce the necessity of car ownership and use. Every person who can live and/or work in a transit-oriented community is a regional transportation benefit. Localities and regions that have invested in a wide range of infrastructure accommodating all travel modes, and that are concentrating development near transit, have had the most success in managing traffic while also increasing economic development. During the past thirty years Arlington has focused growth near transit while planning new pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. It has seen dramatic economic growth and a dramatic increase in trips – without any discernible increase in traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessibility Advisory Committee
    Accessibility Advisory Committee Bus and Rail Subcommittee Meeting Minutes: June 10, 2019 Attendees Present: Tino Calabia (Chair), Elvir Ariza-Silva, Darnise Bush, Erin Coneys, Rico Dancy, Melanie Jackson, Mary Kay McMahon, Phil Posner, and Denise Rush. Call to Order Chair Calabia called the Bus and Rail Subcommittee (BRS) meeting to order at 4:00 pm. Chair Calabia started with introductions of the Committee members. Approval of Agenda and Prior Meeting Minutes: The modified meeting agenda was approved. The topic of Pantograph Style Inter-Car-Barrier was added for committee discussion. The May 13th Meeting Minutes were approved as written. Silver Line Phase 2: Dusty Smith, Outreach and Communications, Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project, delivered a presentation on the status of the Silver Line Phase 2. Mr. Smith provided background of Silver Line Phase 1 and continued to the new six Silver Line Phase 2 stations: Reston Town Center station, Herndon station, Innovation Center station, Dulles Airport station, Loudoun Gateway station, and Ashburn station. The construction of Phase 2 is more than 94% complete. The stations and track are more than 92% complete, whereas the Rail Yard and Maintenance Facility are more than 98% complete. The opening date will be determined by WMATA. He talked about parking (unavailability), bus drop-off/pick up, kiss & ride, bicycle racks, lockers and other racks, per station. Mr. Smith also provided information about the planned and potential growth around each station. At this time, Mr. Smith invited questions from the Committee members. Chair Calabia asked if pictures of the new elevator buttons are available for the Committee to review.
    [Show full text]
  • Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project Silver Line Phase 2 Implementation
    Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project Silver Line Phase 2 Implementation Board Transportation Committee Update May 8, 2018 Mark Canale, Fairfax County Project Manager Fairfax County Department of Transportation Project Status Phase 1 • Old Meadow Road Realignment – 90% design complete. • Construction completion scheduled for the end of 2018. • VDOT punch list ongoing – MWAA and Bechtel to complete • Work on bus bays at Spring Hill and McLean starting May/June • Phase 1 close out - $2.982B (no change) Phase 2 • Overall Phase 2 – 80% complete • Package A (Rail line, system, and stations) – 80% • Sections of the third rail have been energized. • Package B (Rail yard at Dulles) – 81% • Contractual Substantial Completion – August 2019 • WMATA Board to establish Revenue Operations Date 2 Phase 2 – Station Construction • Reston Town Center Station – Mechanical/electrical/plumbing rough-in, stormwater facilities, and pavilion area work ongoing. • Herndon Station – Electrical installation, work on the station vault roof, and continued work on north and south pavilions. • Innovation Station – Masonry, electrical and plumbing, pavilion detailing, and pedestrian bridge touch-up painting. 3 Phase 2 – Station Construction • Dulles Airport Station – Mechanical/electrical/plumbing work, tunnel tie-in work ongoing. • Loudoun Gateway Station – Precast erection, foundation and support walls, pedestrian bridge assembled, concrete walls and decks for north pavilion. • Ashburn Station - Station concrete work, precast erection, pavilion work, and pedestrian bridges erected. 4 Phase 2 – Aerial, Track, Utilities, Systems • Aerial guideway crew welding girders and clean up work • Utility relocation ongoing • Traction Power Feeders – installation of manholes and duct bank to tie into Traction Power Substations (TPSS) and Tie Breaker Stations (TBS), • Ground grids being installed to TPSS and TBS, continue 34.5kV cable installation and conduit installation • Section of 34.5kV energized between TPSS buildings at Herndon, Innovation, and Dulles Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Monthly Report for Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project
    COMPREHENSIVE MONTHLY REPORT November 2017 Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project Phase 2 (Wiehle Avenue Station to Ashburn Station) Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority Washington, DC January 8, 2018 (Revised January 19, 2018) PMOC Contract Number: DTFT60-14-D-00011 Task Order Number: 005, Project Number: DC-27-5331, Work Order No. 02 OPs Referenced: 01, 25 Hill International, Inc. One Commerce Square 2005 Market Street, 17th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103 PMOC Lead: Mathew E. Trzepacz, Length of Time PMOC Assigned to Project: 3.5 years Length of Time PMOC Lead Assigned to Project: 3.5 years coordination meetings have been held, but some utility company responses have been slow to respond and Final Design is now expected to be completed at the end of February 2018. Old Meadow Road construction is estimated to be completed in the second quarter of 2018. The closeout of the FFGA is expected to occur in several years following payment of final Project costs with regard to the first 64 rail cars which is expected to extend until 2021. 3. Core Accountability Information TIFIA Core Accountability Items Project Status: Original at Current TIFIA: Estimate (EAC): Cost Cost Estimate $2,778,235,564 $2,778,235,564 Unallocated Contingency $551,451,179 $363,613,876 Contingency Total Contingency (allocated plus Unallocated) $551,451,179 $363,613,876 Schedule Revenue Service Date 1/31/19 3/31/2020 Percent Amount ($) (of total) Planned Total budgeted cost of work scheduled to date (if available) $1,979,484,501 82% Value to Date Earned Budgeted cost of work completed to date, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Comment Period for Draft 2017 Program
    To: Members of the Alexandria City Transportation Commission and Northern Virginia Transportation Authority Subject: Public Comment Period for Draft 2017 Program My name is Liz Goldmann and I'm a resident of Alexandria. Due to other committments I'm unable to attend the Alexandria City Transportation Commission meeting but wanted to provide my comments on the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority program. Please share this with your commissioners and the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority officials. First and foremost thank you for allowing public comments on this draft program. All of the projects which are included will help transportation but my particular comments relate to four projects which I think are very important and should be granted funding. The first project is the Potomac Yard Metro Station which falls along US Route 1 in Alexandria. This project will be a catalyze for urban development and get people out of their cars and get people to live and work and shop within a reasonable distance of a metro station, something which Alexandria needs more of and something which can be seen in Arlington, DC, Silver Spring, and Bethesda. Potomac Yard will also be a go to station for south Arlington residents as well as a future large employment center for the DC area. This project should be funded. The second project is the 66 Route 28 interchange project which I believe should be funded. Traffic on 66 and 28 is really dreadful and unpredictable. I have the unfortunately experience of traveling 66 three times a week, while I telecommute two days out of the week which helps to keep my sanity.
    [Show full text]
  • Fairfax County Silver Line Station Names
    FAIRFAX COUNTY SILVER LINE STATION NAMES: STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS, SURVEY RESULTS, AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION Nick Perfili, Dulles Rail Project Planner Fairfax County Department of Transportation April 10, 2012 BACKGROUND On March 29, 2011, the Board of Supervisors endorsed recommended names for the Fairfax County Silver Line stations. These names were reviewed by staff from the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA). WMATA staff informed the County that all but two of the proposed station names (Tysons I&II and Reston Town Center) were repetitive, confusing, or not distinctive enough to assist in way-finding and travel on Metrorail (“Tysons,” “Tysons,” “Tysons,” “Tysons;” “Reston,” “Reston;” “Herndon–Reston,” “Herndon”). WMATA’s staff recommendation was based in part on customer research that included both riders and non-riders of the Metrorail system. Ultimately, the WMATA Board of Directors rejected the station names submitted by Fairfax County. As a result of the WMATA Board action and Supervisor Hudgins’ July 26, 2011, Board Matter, Fairfax County Department of Transportation (FCDOT) staff, in partnership with WMATA staff, worked to engage the public on Silver Line station names that fit WMATA’s Station Naming Policy. The policy states station names should be: Relevant: Identify station locations by geographical features, centers of activity or be derived from the names of cities, communities, neighborhoods or landmarks within one-half mile (walking distance) of the station; Brief: Limited to 19 characters with spaces and punctuation, including both primary and secondary names; Unique: Distinctive and not easily confused with other station names; and Evocative: Evoke imagery in the mind of the patron.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle River Main Office 11471 Business Blvd Eagle River
    POST OFFICE NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE EAGLE RIVER MAIN OFFICE 11471 BUSINESS BLVD EAGLE RIVER AK 99577 HUFFMAN 1221 HUFFMAN PARK DR ANCHORAGE AK 99515 DOWNTOWN STATION 315 BARNETTE ST FAIRBANKS AK 99701 KETCHIKAN MAIN OFFICE 3609 TONGASS AVE KETCHIKAN AK 99901 MIDTOWN STATION 3721 B ST ANCHORAGE AK 99503 WASILLA MAIN OFFICE 401 N MAIN ST WASILLA AK 99654 ANCHORAGE MAIN OFFICE 4141 POSTMARK DR ANCHORAGE AK 99530 KODIAK MAIN OFFICE 419 LOWER MILL BAY RD KODIAK AK 99615 PALMER MAIN OFFICE 500 S COBB ST PALMER AK 99645 COLLEGE BRANCH 755 FAIRBANKS ST FAIRBANKS AK 99709 MENDENHALL STATION 9491 VINTAGE BLVD JUNEAU AK 99801 SYLACAUGA MAIN OFFICE 1 S BROADWAY AVE SYLACAUGA AL 35150 SCOTTSBORO POST OFFICE 101 S MARKET ST SCOTTSBORO AL 35768 ANNISTON MAIN OFFICE 1101 QUINTARD AVE ANNISTON AL 36201 TALLADEGA MAIN OFFICE 127 EAST ST N TALLADEGA AL 35160 TROY MAIN OFFICE 1300 S BRUNDIDGE ST TROY AL 36081 PHENIX CITY MAIN OFFICE 1310 9TH AVE PHENIX CITY AL 36867 TUSCALOOSA MAIN OFFICE 1313 22ND AVE TUSCALOOSA AL 35401 CLAYTON MAIN OFFICE 15 S MIDWAY ST CLAYTON AL 36016 HOOVER POST OFFICE 1809 RIVERCHASE DR HOOVER AL 35244 MEADOWBROOK 1900 CORPORATE DR BIRMINGHAM AL 35242 FLORENCE MAIN OFFICE 210 N SEMINARY ST FLORENCE AL 35630 ALBERTVILLE MAIN OFFICE 210 S HAMBRICK ST ALBERTVILLE AL 35950 JASPER POST OFFICE 2101 3RD AVE S JASPER AL 35501 AUBURN MAIN OFFICE 300 OPELIKA RD AUBURN AL 36830 FORT PAYNE POST OFFICE 301 1ST ST E FORT PAYNE AL 35967 ROANOKE POST OFFICE 3078 HIGHWAY 431 ROANOKE AL 36274 BEL AIR STATION 3410 BEL AIR MALL MOBILE AL 36606
    [Show full text]
  • The Original Survey
    CHAPTER 1 1865 - 1911 in 1913. By then renumbered Southern Ry. 3770, it had served the line for a quarter of a century. (K. E. Schlachfe? When the dust cleared the unfortunate Lewis AL&Hs management had only limited freedom to McKenzie faced a daunting job. He now had a bat- spend money. tered railroad as far west as Vienna and not much of Somehow McKenzie managed to patch up the rail- anythmg beyond there. And since the Federal gov- road, although it took time. As best anyone can deter- ernment had viewed the Alexandria, Loudoun & mine now, the line's three original locomotives came Hampshire as an "enemy railroad" it offered nothing home-doubtless also needing patching upand a to rehabilitate the line. (This must have been espe- fourth was acquired as surplus from the government cially galling to McKenzie, who had been a staunch and rebuilt in the Alexandria shop. By January 1866 Unionist before and during the war-a position not the railroad was only open as far west as Hunter's Mill popular with his Alexandria friends.) Not only was the and Thomton, less than seven miles beyond Vienna. state of Virginia clearly in no position to help, but it It was not until June 1867 that trains could operate all was anxious to liquidate its stock holdings-forcing Ithe way to Leesburg again. McKenzie and his associates to arrange to buy out the By 1868 the road was finally whole, with a roster of 0 state's stake. Until that was accomplished in 1867, the four locomotives, four passenger coaches, two mail state effectively held a lien on the property and the and express cars, and 43 assorted freight cars-most '9 .111..1.1.11.1.11.1 11..~...IIIL.ll.1..1....1..1............
    [Show full text]
  • Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project Phase 2 Wiehle Avenue Station To
    COMPREHENSIVE MONTHLY REPORT June 2016 Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project Phase 2 (Wiehle Avenue Station to Ashburn Station) Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority Washington, DC July 28, 2016 PMOC Contract Number: DTFT60-14-D-00011 Task Order Number: 005, Project Number: DC-27-5331, Work Order No. 02 OPs Referenced: 01, 25 Hill International, Inc. One Commerce Square 2005 Market Street, 17th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103 PMOC Lead: Length of Time PMOC Assigned to Project: 3.0 years Length of Time PMOC Lead Assigned to Project: 3.0 years TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................................................1 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................................1 2. PROJECT STATUS SUMMARY................................................................................................................................2 3. CORE ACCOUNTABILITY INFORMATION...............................................................................................................3 4. MAJOR PROBLEMS/ISSUES...................................................................................................................................4 MAIN REPORT ..........................................................................................................................................................5 1. GRANTEE’S CAPABILITIES AND APPROACH .........................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Responses to Local / Regional Agency Comments on I-66 Corridor Improvements Tier 2 Draft Environmental Assessment
    APPENDIX D RESPONSES TO LOCAL / REGIONAL AGENCY COMMENTS ON I-66 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS TIER 2 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT I-66 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS TIER 2 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT State Project: 0066-96A-297; UPC 105500 From: US 15 To: I-495 Prince William and Fairfax Counties, Virginia Federal Highway Administration Virginia Department of Transportation Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation Except for a few minor editorial corrections, the text in this appendix is unchanged from what was presented in the Tier 2 Revised EA. New substantive comments (i.e., those on the Tier 2 Revised EA) are addressed in Appendix G of the Tier 2 Final EA. This page intentionally left blank. Virginia Railway Express (VRE) – 6/17/15 Responses to Local/Regional Agency Comments D-1 1.) The Preferred Alternatives is indeed a combination of elements that were identified as part of Alternatives 2A and 2B. Recognizing the cost and complexity of the proposed improvements, VDOT has recommended that the project be implemented in phases. The proposed first phase extends the express lanes for 22 of the original 25 miles, from I-495 to Gainesville (University Boulevard), and then transitions to a traditional HOV lane in each direction. Efforts will be made to minimize expansion of VDOT right of way at University Boulevard and other areas in proximity to the B Line railroad corridor so as not to preclude options to expand the railroad corridor at a future time. 2.) In the Tier 2 Draft EA, park-and-ride lots were proposed at University Boulevard in Gainesville and in Haymarket.
    [Show full text]