DOCSLIB.ORG

Port Oneida Rural Historic District Historic Name Pyramid Point, Port Oneida Other Names/Site Number

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Port Oneida Rural Historic District Historic Name Pyramid Point, Port Oneida Other Names/Site Number NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior MAY I 4 1997 National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16 A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Port Oneida Rural Historic District historic name Pyramid Point, Port Oneida other names/site number 2. LOCATION street & number Rural Route Port Oneida _not for publication city or town Maple City_______________ _vicinity X_____ state Michigan code MI _county Leelanau code 089 zip code 49664 3. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this _ nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant _ nationally X statewide_ locally, fee continuation sheet for additional comments). Jl Signature of certifying official State or Federal agency a»d bureau In my opinion, the property X meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria. (_ See conj^rfuktion sheet lor additional comments). Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION FORM: Port Oneida Rural Historic District 4. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE CERTIFICATION I, h/reby, certify that this property is: v entered in the National Register _ See continuation sheet. _ determined eligible for the National Register __ _ See continuation sheet. _ determined not eligible for the National Register _ removed from the National Register ______ _ other (explain): _________________ Signature of Keeper Date of Action 5. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property (Check as many boxes as apply) X private X public-local _ public-State X public-Federal Category of Property (Check only one box) _ building(s) X district _ site _ structure _ object Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 121 14 buildings _5_ 0 sites 20 0 structures 0 0 objects 146 14 Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register 0 Name of related multiple property listing (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) N/A NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION FORM: Port Oneida Rural Historic District 6. FUNCTION OR USE Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions) CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY Agriculture/Subsistence processing, storage, agricultural field, animal facility, horticultural facility, agricultural outbuilding Domestic single-dwelling Social clubhouse Education schoolhouse Funerary cemetery, grave/burial Landscape forest Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY Recreation outdoor recreation Domestic single-dwelling Vacant/not in use 7. DESCRIPTION Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) Other: upright and wing house (balloon frame) with Greek Revival elements, gable roofed barn (heavy timber frame), various agricultural outbuildings_____________________ Materials (Enter categories from instructions) foundation: stone, concrete________________________________ roof: asphalt, asbestos, aluminum, wood shingle_________________________ walls: weatherboard, stone- weatherboard with asphalt roll____________________ other: _________________________________________ Narrative Description (See continuation sheets, page 7). 8. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Applicable National Register Criteria (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property for National Register listing) X A Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. __ B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION FORM: Port Oneida Rural Historic District __ C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. __ D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations (Mark "X" in all the boxes that apply.) __ A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. __ B removed from its original location. __ C a birthplace or a grave. __ D a cemetery. __ E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. __ F a commemorative property. __G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past 50 years. Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) Agriculture__________ Ethnic heritage European Settlement________ Period of Significance 1870-1945 Significant Dates N/A Significant Person (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) Cultural Affiliation ______________________ Architect/Builder __ _____________ ____________ Narrative Statement of Significance (See continuation sheets, page 23) NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION FORM: Port Oneida Rural Historic District 9. MAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES (See continuation sheets, page 29) Previous documentation on file (NPS) __ preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67) has been requested. __ previously listed in the National Register __ previously determined eligible by the National Register __ designated a National Historic Landmark X recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey # MI-350. MI-351. MI-351A. M-352. MI-352A. MI-352B. MI-353. MI-353A. MI-354. MI-354A, MI-355A. MI-356. MI-357. MI-358. MI-359. MI-360A. MI-363. MI-364A. MI-65A. MI-383. MI-393. MI-394. MI-395. MI-396. _ recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # ________ Primary Location of Additional Data (Homestead and Pre-Emption claims) __ State Historic Preservation Office __ Other State agency X Federal agency __ Local government __ University __ Other Name of repository: Cultural Resources. NPS-Midwest Field Area, and Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore.______ 10. GEOGRAPHICAL DATA Acreage of Property approx. 3400 acres UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet) Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 1 3 2 4 X See continuation sheet (page 33). Verbal Boundary Description (See continuation sheet, page 33). Boundary Justification (See continuation sheet, page 34). 11. FORM PREPARED BY name/title Maria J. McEnanev. Historical Landscape Architect organization National Park Service. Midwest Field Area date 31 December 1996 street & number 1709 Jackson Street________ telephone (402)221-3309 city or town Omaha_______ state Nebraska zip code 68102______ NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION FORM: Port Oneida Rural Historic District Additional Documentation Submit the following items with the completed form: Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) Property Owner (Complete this item at the request of the SHPO or FPO.) name_____________________________________________ street & number _______________________ telephone _______________ city or town ________________ state __________ zip code Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Project (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION FORM: Port Oneida Rural Historic District NFS Form 10-900-a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section 7 Page 1 Port Oneida Rural Historic District name of property Leelanau County. Michigan_____ county and State Narrative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hurricane Standards
    2012 Edition Hurricane Standards MAINMAINBRONZEMAINBRONZEBRONZESILVERSILVERSILGOLDVER GOLDGOLDPLATINUMPLATINUMPLATINUMB&W B&W B&W FORTIFIED is a program of the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety HURRICANEHURRICANEHURRICANE WILDFIREWILDFIREWILDFIRE HAIL HAIL HAIL EARTHQUEARTHQUAKEEARTHQUAKE AKE FORTIFIED STANDARDS - HURRICANE 3 Table of Contents Hurricane Resistance Bronze Designation Attachment to Wall 5 Objective 45 Prescriptive Retrofit Measure for Anchorage 5 Designation Term Limit of the Roof through the Walls to the Foundation 5 Definitions 53 Securing Chimneys 53 Prescriptive retrofit measures Hurricane Resistance Bronze1 Designation 53 Engineering-based retrofit measure without Roof Cover Replacement 54 Figure G-08: Typical Tie-Down for Chimney Framing 6 Introduction 55 Ensure Windows and Doors Meet Site Appropriate 6 Strengthening of roof sheathing attachment and Design Pressures providing a sealed roof deck for the roof 55 Design pressure rating and impact designation from within the attic requirements 7 Improving the attachment of drip edges 7 Improving the attachment/replacing ridge vents Appendix A and off-ridge vents 56 Introduction 56 Types of Failures Hurricane Resistance Bronze2 Designation 57 Prescriptive Method with Roof Cover Replacement 8 Roof deck attachment (re-nail the roof decking) Appendix B 10 Deteriorated or damaged roof deck 82 Exposure Categories 10 Requirements for replacement of roof decking 10 Deteriorated or damaged wood roof framing Appendix C member 83 Design Wind Pressures for Components:
    [Show full text]
  • FRSA Article & Technical Advisory on Sealed Attics
    A Publication of the FRSA ◆ Florida’s Association of Roofing Professionals Research Remains to Be Conducted on Effects of Sealed Attics on Roofing Systems in By John Hellein, RFM Editor – Redistributed with Permision Florida’s Climate According to comments at FRSA’s April committee meetings, materials, the risk of moisture problems due the use of sealed attics as a residential insulation solution has to reduced drying potential of the system become widespread in Florida. Some member contractors will increase substantially. This could lead to expressed concern about possible negative effects caused potential long-term accumulation of moisture in the when attics are sealed and ventilation that allows for the en- roof system resulting in costly and potentially haz- try and egress of air in the attic is eliminated. At the same ardous structural deterioration as well as possible time, members recognized that sufficient scientific research, health risks. specific to Florida’s high temperature, high humidity climate ARMA’s Technical Bulletin (Form No. 211-RR-94) referenc- has yet to be conducted. es “Shingle Application Directly Over Insulated Decks” and A primary concern about sealed attics is the possibility states: that the lack of air movement into and out of the attic might result in moisture that permeates from the living space be- This type of application is not recommended unless low being trapped. The trapped moisture could encourage an adequate free-flow ventilation space is created the growth of mold in the insulation or trusses. Also, it is between the top of any insulation and the under- possible that the higher humidity could weaken the wood in side of a nailable deck.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-SEASON 16X30 VERMONT COTTAGE C SOLUTIONS Pre-Cut Kit
    LIVING SOLUTIONS LIVING SOLUTIONS LIVING 4-SEASON 16X30 VERMONT COTTAGE C SOLUTIONS Pre-Cut Kit This inviting one room shanty offers an open floor plan and loft that extends over the porch. Pool house, home office, hunting cabin; the options abound with this design. Consider upgrading to four-season for a sanctuary you can escape to all year round. 16X30 VERMONT COTTAGE C The 4-season kit includes the complete kit plus insulation throughout, roof sheathing, 4-SEASON PRE-CUT KIT interior shiplap pine wall and ceiling sheathing, Base Area: 480 sq. ft. double pane windows and an insulated door. Note: Loft Area: 128 sq. ft. Pictures may reflect client upgrades and modifications Total Interior Area: 544 sq. ft. that do not come standard. Porch Area: 64 sq. ft. Roof Recommended Foundation: Gable Roof Style Compacted 12” Crushed Gravel Roof Pitch: 8/12 Overall Dimensions: 14’6”H x 18’6W x 32’6”D 2”x6” Kiln Dried Spruce Rafters 24” On Center Estimated Weight: 22300 lbs 2”x6” Kiln Dried Spruce Exposed Collar Ties Floor System 1” rough sawn Solid Barn 3 (qty) 6x6x30’ Hemlock Skids Board Roof Sheathing 2”x6” Kiln Dried Spruce Joists 16” On Center Roof Vapor Barrier ¾” CDX Plywood Floor Decking 5½” Fiberglass Insulation (R21) 4-SEASON KITS: 1” rough sawn Hemlock Porch Decking Shiplap Pine Interior Ceiling Sheathing The package includes the complete kit Floor Vapor Barrier Corrugated 29g Metal Roofing, plus vapor barrier, insulation, solid pine roof 5½” Fiberglass Insulation (R21) Color: Evergreen sheathing, ship lap pine interior wall and Under Deck Sheathing: ⅜” Plywood 12” Overhangs on all sides ceiling sheathing, double-pane, energy effi- Floor Weight Rating: 25 lbs/sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Mitigation Retrofits for Existing Site-Built Single-Family
    HURRICANE MITIGATION RETROFITS FOR EXISTING SITE-BUILT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES 101 Retrofits Required. Pursuant to Section 553.844 553.884, Florida Statutes, strengthening of existing site-built, single family residential structures to resist hurricanes shall be provided. 101.1 When a roof on an existing site-built, single family residential structure is replaced: (a) Roof-decking attachment and fasteners shall be strengthened and corrected as required by section 201.1. (b) A secondary water barrier shall be provided as required by section 201.2. 101.2 When a roof is replaced on a building that is located in the wind-borne debris region as defined in s. 1609.2 of the Florida Building Code, Building and that has an insured value of $300,000 or more or, if the building is uninsured or for which documentation of insured value is not presented, has a just valuation for the structure for purposes of ad valorem taxation of $300,000 or more: (a) Roof to wall connections shall be improved as required by section 201.3. (b) Mandated retrofits of the roof-to-wall connection shall not be required beyond a 15 percent increase in the cost of re-roofing. (c) Where complete retrofits of all the roof-to-wall connections as prescribed in Section 201.3 would exceed 15 percent of the cost of the re-roofing project, the priorities outlined in Section 201.3.5 shall be used to limit the scope of work to the 15 percent limit. 101.3 When any activity requiring a building permit that is applied for on or after July 1, 2008, and for which the estimated cost is $50,000 or more for a building that is located in the wind borne debris region as defined in s.
    [Show full text]
  • Roofing Handbook
    FM_Scharff_CMS 6x9 9/21/00 2:04 PM Page i ROOFING HANDBOOK Robert Scharff (Deceased) Terry Kennedy Second Edition McGraw-Hill New York San Francisco Washington, D.C. Auckland Bogotá Caracas Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan Montreal New Delhi San Juan Singapore Sydney Tokyo Toronto FM_Scharff_CMS 6x9 9/21/00 2:04 PM Page ii Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Scharff, Robert. Roofing handbook / Robert Scharff, Terry Kennedy.—2nd ed. p. cm. ISBN 0-07-136058-1 1. Roofing. I. Kennedy, Terry. II. Title. TH2431.S28 2000 695—dc21 00-062522 McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2001, 1996 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Except as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a data base or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. 1234567890 DOC/DOC 06543210 P/N 137056-0 PART OF ISBN 0-07-136058-1 The sponsoring editor for this book was Zoe G. Foundotos, the editing supervisor was Stephen M. Smith, and the production supervisor was Sherri Souffrance. It was set in Melior following the modified CMS 6x9 design by Joanne Morbit and Michele Pridmore of McGraw- Hill’s Hightstown, N.J., Professional Book Group composition unit. Printed and bound by R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company. This book is printed on recycled, acid-free paper containing a minimum of 50% recycled, de-inked fiber. McGraw-Hill books are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales promotions, or for use in corporate training programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Roof Nailing Over Skip Sheathing
    TECHNICAL NOTE APA Structural-Use Panels Over Spaced-Board Roofs Number P300C January 2006 When replacing roofing, it is often necessary to cover spaced boards with a solid roof deck. APA Rated Sheathing panels, which include plywood and oriented strand board, may be used for this purpose. When the panels are attached over the spaced boards to the rafters or trusses, the resulting roof structure will have greater resistance to wind and seismic forces than the original spaced-board roof. The spaced boards do not have to be removed or replaced, except to repair decayed, broken or warped pieces. The recommendations in this Technical Note are consistent with ASCE 7-02 and the 2003 IBC for wind uplift capacity for design wind speeds up to 100 mph (3-second gust) and a gable-end or hip roof with a 30-foot mean height with a slope between 2/12 and 12/12 at an inland location (Exposure B). Hurricane-prone regions of the Atlantic and Gulf coasts will typically require additional fastening to resist higher wind-load forces. The existing roof sheathing boards are assumed to be 1-inch nominal boards at a maximum spacing of 12 inches o.c. Structural requirements for the panels are usually minimal because of installation over the spaced boards. Panels 5/16 inch or thicker may be used. Panels should be allowed to acclimatize for a few days before installing on the roof. Acclimatize panels by standing them on edge, out of the weather, with space between each for air circulation. APA recommends that all panel end and edge joints be spaced 1/8 inch at time of installation, unless otherwise recom- mended by the panel manufacturer.a Cover sheathing as soon as possible with roofing felt for extra protection against mois- ture prior to roofing application.
    [Show full text]
  • High Wind Standards
    HIGH WIND STANDARDS 2015 Table of Contents Program Overview and Definitions ..................................................................................................................... 4 Goals ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4 FORTIFIED Home Eligible Dwellings ............................................................................................................................ 4 Definitions and Conditions ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Foundation Qualification Requirements ..................................................................................................................... 5 Available Designations ................................................................................................................................................ 6 Objectives ................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Designation Term Limit ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Definitions ................................................................................................................................................................... 8 FORTIFIED
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Structure Report: Hale Cabin, Elkmont Historic District, Great Smoky Mountains National Park List of Figures
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Elkmont Historic District Great Smoky Mountains National Park Hale Cabin Elkmont Historic District Great Smoky Mountains National Park Historic Structure Report Cultural Resources, Partnerships and Science Division Southeast Region Hale Cabin Elkmont Historic District Great Smoky Mountains National Park Historic Structure Report March 2016 Prepared by The Jaeger Company Under the direction of National Park Service Southeast Regional Office Cultural Resources, Partnerships and Science Division TheThe culturalreport presented landscape here report exists presentedin two formats. here A exists printed in two formats. A printed version is available for study at the park, version is available for study at the park, the Southeastern the Southeastern Regional Office of the National Park Service,Regional and Office at a ofvariety the National of other Park repositories. Service, and For at morea variety widespread access, this cultural landscape report also exists of other repositories. For more widespread access, this report in a web-based format through ParkNet, the website of the Nationalalso exists Park in a Service.web-based Please format visit through www.nps.gov Integrated for Resource more information. Management Applications (IRMA). Please visit www.irma. nps.gov for more information. Cultural Resources, Partnerships and Science Division Cultural Resources Southeast Regional Office Southeast Region National Park Service National Park Service 100 Alabama Street, SW 100 Alabama St. SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Atlanta, GA 30303 (404)507-5847 (404) 562-3117 Great Smoky Mountains National Park 107 Park Headquarters Road Gatlinburg, TN 37738 2006 www.nps.gov/grsmCultural Landscape Report AboutDoughton the cover: Park View ofand the Sections Hale Cabin, 2A, 2015 B, and C Blue Ridge Parkway Asheville, NC Hale Cabin Elkmont Historic District Great Smoky Mountains National Park Historic Structure Report Approved By : ~~~~~______.___..__,~d~~!------ ..
    [Show full text]
  • Roof Replacement Specifications Riverside
    ROOF REPLACEMENT SPECIFICATIONS RIVERSIDE HIGH SCHOOL 794 HAMMET BRIDGE RD. GREER, SOUTH CAROLINA 29650 PROJECT NO. GSP1010.059 Prepared For GREENVILLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 301 CAMPERDOWN WAY GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29602 Prepared By RAYMOND ENGINEERING-GEORGIA, INC. GREER, SOUTH CAROLINA April 13, 2020 _______________________________ Brent A. Iverson, R.R.C., R.R.O. Greg Rivers, P.E. Raymond Engineering-Georgia, Inc. Riverside High School Project No. GSP1010.059 Roof Replacement SECTION 00 01 10 TABLE OF CONTENTS Division 00 – Procurement and Contracting Requirements Section 00 01 10 – Table of Contents The School District of Greenville County – Invitation for Bid Division 01 – General Requirements Section 01 11 00 – Summary of Work Section 01 22 13 – Unit Prices and Allowances Section 01 26 00 – Modification Procedures Section 01 29 73 – Schedule of Values Section 01 29 76 – Application for Payment Section 01 31 19 – Project Meetings Section 01 32 13 – Construction Schedules Section 01 33 00 – Submittals Section 01 33 23 – Shop Drawing, Product Data, and Samples Section 01 42 19 – Reference Standards Section 01 45 00 – Quality Control Section 01 50 00 – Temporary Facilities and Controls Section 01 60 00 – Product Requirements Section 01 66 00 – Storage and Protection Section 01 73 30 – Asbestos Products Section 01 74 00 – Cleaning Section 01 77 00 – Project Closeout Procedures Section 01 78 36 – Guaranties Section 01 78 39 – Project Record Documents Division 02 – Existing Conditions Section 02 41 13 – Selective Demolition and Preparations
    [Show full text]
  • Project Number 4002-12 PROJECT MANUAL for ALDINE SENIOR
    Project Number 4002-12 PROJECT MANUAL for ALDINE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL MECHANICAL AND ROOF REPLACEMENT PACKAGE # PCK RP 18-11 Houston, Texas for ALDINE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Houston, Texas ISSUE FOR BID – 10/30/2017 IDG ARCHITECTS, LLC 440 Benmar Drive, Suite No. 3335 Houston, Texas 77060 832-448-2462 ROOFING Arrow Consulting Corp. 104 Industrial Blvd., Suite 1 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 281-565-1155 281-565-2440 Fax MEP #1 Lee, Truong & Yu, PLLC 16225 Park Ten Pl #810 Houston, Texas 77084 281/945/8888 www.lty-engineers.com MEP #2 Stanton Engineering Group 1300 W. Sam Houston Pkwy. S. Suite 200 Houston, Texas 77402 10/30/2017 713-300-9292 Aldine Senior High School Mechanical and Roof Replacement Project No. 4002-12 PCKRP 18-11 PROJECT DIRECTORY ALDINE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL MECHANICAL AND ROOF REPLACEMENT Aldine Independent School District IDG Project No. 4002-12 BOARD OF EDUCATION Dr. Viola M. Garcia, President Rose Ogden, Vice President Steve Mead, Secretary Paul Shankin, Assistant Secretary Steve Mead, Trustee Patricia Ann Bourgeois, Trustee Conception Esperza, Trustee Dr. Kimberly Booker, Trustee ADMINISTRATION Dr. Wanda Bamberg, Superintendent Dr. Archie L. Blanson, Deputy Superintendent Patrick Mouton, Executive Director of Facilities and Construction OWNER ALDINE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1617 Lauder Houston, Texas 77039 ARCHITECT IDG ARCHITECTS, LLC Telephone: 832-448-2462 440 Benmar Drive Email: [email protected] Houston, Texas 77060 Fax # 832-448-2466 Ben S. McMillan III, AIA, NCARB Principal-In-Charge ROOFING Arrow Consulting Corp. 104 Industrial Blvd., Suite 1 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 281-565-1155 281-565-2440 Fax MEP #1 Lee, Truong & Yu, PLLC 16225 Park Ten Pl #810 Houston, Texas 77084 281/945/8888 Aldine Senior High School Mechanical and Roof Replacement Project No.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Slope Roof Application Information
    GROWTH AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Building and Zoning 123 West Indiana Ave., Deland, FL 32720 (386) 736-5929 Fax (386) 943-7096 RESIDENTIAL SLOPE ROOF APPLICATION INFORMATION Effective April 6, 2008 WHEN A ROOF ON AN EXISTING BUILDING IS WIND-BORNE REPLACED THAT HAS A VALUE =>$300,000 THIS COLUMN IS FOR INFORMATION AND DEBRIS AREA SECTION 101.2, 201.1 & 201.2 WILL APPLY EXAMPLES ONLY. RETROFITS BUILDING VALUATION WILL BE DETERMINED PER SECTION 101.2 ROOF-DECKING ATTACHMENT AND WHEN A ROOF ON AN EXISTING SITE-BUILT, THIS REQUIREMENT APPLIES TO ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE IS FASTENERS REROOFING PERMITS. SECTION 101.1 (a) REPLACED: SECTION 201.1 WILL APPLY. PEEL & STICK MUST COMPLY WITH SECTION 201.2 & ASTM D1970 THIS REQUIREMENT APPLIES TO ALL SECONDARY [ ] ALL SHEATHING JOINTS REROOFING PERMITS. WATER BARRIER [ ] ENTIRE ROOF DECK EXAMPLE: [ ] ALL SHEATHING JOINTS SECTION 101 (b) Not required if underlayment is installed per 201.2 c) or d) [ X ] ENTIRE ROOF DECK EXAMPLE: 5” IN 12” (INCHES OF RISE IN 12” OF SLOPE: _____“ IN 12” RUN) AVERAGE ROOF EXAMPLE: 15 FEET (SINGLE STORY HEIGHT: _____ FEET BUILDING) EXAMPLE (S): ½” PLYWOOD, 5/8” OSB DECK TYPE: ___________________________________ UNDERLAYMENT: FBC Bldg 1507.2.3 Underlayment ** NOT REQUIRED IF TYPE : __________ LAYERS: _______ EXAMPLE: SHEATHING IS ASTM D 226, TYPE I or II [ ] 15 # Felt Type: __1__ Layers: __1__ COMPLETELY [ ] 30 # Felt [ x] ASTM D 226 [ ] 15# Felt COVERED WITH PEEL & Approved Synthetic [ ] ASU [ x ] 30# Felt STICK Underlayment ___________________________________ EXAMPLE: ROOF COVERING: MANUFACTURER ABC ROOFING PRODUCTS, INC. PINEVALLEY 30 AR ___________________________________________ PRODUCT EXAMPLE: 1675.4 (FL#) - OR – APPROVAL FLORIDA APPROVAL #: _______________________ NOA No 03-0528.06 (MIAMI/DADE) -OR- METHOD: MIAMI/DADE N.O.A.: __________________________ EXAMPLE: FASTENERS: TYPE:____________________________ 11/2” GALVANIZED ROOFING NAIL HURRICANE MITIGATION RETROFITS FOR EXISTING SITE-BUILT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES 101 Retrofits Required.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Condition Report for Eight Extant Structures Within the Former Portland Company Industrial Complex at 58 Fore Street
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 2 2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 DOCUMENT REVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS .......................................................................................... 6 3.2 PREVIOUS STUDIES AND HISTORIC RESEARCH ................................................................................. 6 OBSERVATION, EVALUATION, RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................... 7 4.0 GENERAL OBSERVATIONS AND EVALUATIONS ................................................................................. 7 4.1 BUILDING 1 – ERECTING BUILDING, 1918 ...................................................................................... 11 4.2 BUILDING 2 – MACHINE SHOP, 1847, 1905 (3D FLOOR) ................................................................. 14 4.3 BUILDING 3 – MACHINE SHOP, 1847 .............................................................................................. 17 4.4 BUILDING 4 – FOUNDRY, 1895 ....................................................................................................... 19 4.5 BUILDING 6B – BLACKSMITH SHOP, C. 1896-1904 ........................................................................
    [Show full text]