Ib History of the Americas Confederation –Canada 1867 Study Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

IB HISTORY OF THE AMERICAS CONFEDERATION –CANADA 1867 STUDY GUIDE Guiding Question: How does one define Nationhood? Key Terms Upper Canada Clear Grit Party Great Coalition Lower Canada Canadian Parti rouge Charlottetown Conference Canada East Bytown (Ottawa) Quebec Conference Canada West “Rep by pop” Intercolonial Railway Act of Union George-Étienne Cartier 72 Resolutions responsible government Reciprocity Treaty Leonard Tilley Annexation Movement Grand Trunk Railway Charles Tupper John A. Macdonald Common School Act Fenians Conservative Party Trent affair London Conference George Brown St. Alban’s raid A Mari Usque Ad Mare Study Questions 1. What were the main sources of political discontent in Upper and Lower Canada in the years between 1820 and mid- century? To what degree did British North Americans in the Maritimes share those grievances? 2. Did the rebellions of 1837 succeed or fail in their objectives? Explain the short- and long-term effect of the rebellion. 3. In his works on the political deadlocks in the 1850s and 1860s, Paul G. Cornell has argued that the Great Coalition of 1864 was “the main spring of the Confederation movement.” How valid is this common assessment? To what extent does it ignore the role of the Maritimers in the coming of the union? 4. It is often argued that Britain showed “apparent indifference” to British North America's fate in the early 1860s. Did Britain aid the Confederation movement? If so, how? 5. In 1865 George-Étienne Cartier claimed that the British North American colonies faced a choice between Confederation or absorption into the American union. How valid or, indeed, accurate was this claim? 6. “The great majority of nations have been formed, not by people who desired intensely to live together, but rather by people who could not live separately.” Assess this statement made by French-Canadian historian Jean Charles Bonenfant (1966). To what extent does the analysis apply to French Canadians in the 1860s? To Maritimers and Upper Canadians at that time? 7. What kind of federal system did the Fathers of the Confederation create at the Conferences of the 1860s? Why did it evolve into a federal as opposed to a legislative union? 8. To what extent were the Quebec Resolutions and the plan of federal union “imposed” upon the people of the various British North American colonies? 9. Compare the Canadian and American systems of government. How were regional, state, or provincial interests protected in the two federal systems? 10. To what extent did the American Constitution and the British North America Act embrace the notion of “perpetual union”? How flexible were the two federal systems? A. Schulzki - PHS Page 1 3 September, 2019 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Stories of Confederation Reference Guide
Library and Archives Canada, C-000733 Stories of Confederation Reference Guide Use this reference guide in tandem with our online educational package. Find it at historymuseum.ca/teachers-zone/stories-of-confederation. Act of Union, 1840 Passed by the British Parliament in July 1840 and proclaimed in February 1841, the Act of Union brought Upper and Lower Canada (present-day Ontario and Quebec) together under a single assembly and government, as recommended in the Durham Report. The two were now called the United Province of Canada, and were subdivided into Canada West and Canada East. Each region received an equal number of seats in the assembly; English became the sole official language. British Empire The term British Empire refers collectively to Britain’s overseas territories and colonies. At its height in the late 1800s and early 1900s, the British Empire spanned the globe, and came to be known as “the empire on which the sun never sets.” Britain supported Confederation because it believed that a single dominion would be easier to defend, and less costly to administer, than several small, separate colonies. British North America British North America refers collectively to the British colonies and territories of northern North America. The term was used mostly between 1783 and 1867, but it has a longer history. British North America The British North America Act was a law passed by the British Parliament Act, 1867 to create the Dominion of Canada as a domestically self-governing federation. The Act divided law-making powers between one federal parliament and several provincial legislatures, and it outlined the structure and operations of both levels of government.
[Show full text]
The Day of Sir John Macdonald – a Chronicle of the First Prime Minister
.. CHRONICLES OF CANADA Edited by George M. Wrong and H. H. Langton In thirty-two volumes 29 THE DAY OF SIR JOHN MACDONALD BY SIR JOSEPH POPE Part VIII The Growth of Nationality SIR JOHX LIACDONALD CROSSING L LALROLAILJ 3VER TIIE XEWLY COSSTRUC CANADI-IN P-ICIFIC RAILWAY, 1886 From a colour drawinrr bv C. \TT. Tefferv! THE DAY OF SIR JOHN MACDONALD A Chronicle of the First Prime Minister of the Dominion BY SIR JOSEPH POPE K. C. M. G. TORONTO GLASGOW, BROOK & COMPANY 1915 PREFATORY NOTE WITHINa short time will be celebrated the centenary of the birth of the great statesman who, half a century ago, laid the foundations and, for almost twenty years, guided the destinies of the Dominion of Canada. Nearly a like period has elapsed since the author's Memoirs of Sir John Macdonald was published. That work, appearing as it did little more than three years after his death, was necessarily subject to many limitations and restrictions. As a connected story it did not profess to come down later than the year 1873, nor has the time yet arrived for its continuation and completion on the same lines. That task is probably reserved for other and freer hands than mine. At the same time, it seems desirable that, as Sir John Macdonald's centenary approaches, there should be available, in convenient form, a short r6sum6 of the salient features of his vii viii SIR JOHN MACDONALD career, which, without going deeply and at length into all the public questions of his time, should present a familiar account of the man and his work as a whole, as well as, in a lesser degree, of those with whom he was intimately associated.
[Show full text]
Les Dessous De La Confédération Canadienne: Politicailleries Et Tractations 2 Luc Guay, Ph.D Didactique De L’Histoire UTA, Mai 2018 Plan
Les dessous de la Confédération canadienne: politicailleries et tractations 2 Luc Guay, Ph.D didactique de l’histoire UTA, mai 2018 Plan Le Canada-Uni: 1848-1864 1. Une union…instable 2. Des alliances …impensables et indispensables! De 1847 à 1851: Lafontaine et Baldwin De 1851 à 1854: Morin et Hincks De 1854 à 1864: crise politique, pcq pas double majorité 3. Deux Conférences préparatoires tenues à huis clos 1. Instabilité politique au Canada-Uni 1854 à 1864 10 élections en 10 ans au Canada-Uni! Pourquoi? Pcq: Les 2 anciennes « provinces » même réunies, administraient les affaires comme si elles étaient séparées Ainsi, si une loi était votée et qui touchait aux deux « provinces », elle devait recevoir l’appui majoritaire des députés des deux « régions »: c’est ce qu’on appela la double majorité À partir de 1857, les Clear Grits sont majoritaires au Haut- Canada: impossible d’obtenir double majorité pcq les Rouges du Canada-Est ne s’entendent pas avec eux… Les capitales changent…souvent 2 Premiers Ministres (un pour le Canada-Est et un pour le Canada-Ouest. En 1856 il y avait 130 députés (65 dans chaque section). Changements de capitales Kingston (1841-1844) Montréal (1844-1849) Toronto (1849-1852, 1856-1858) Québec (1852-1856, 1859-1866) Ottawa (1866-1867) Double majorité avait permis: 1841-1849 : - alliance réformiste (les Bleus) entre LaFontaine (Canada- Est) et (les Tories, Liberal-Conservative Party) Baldwin (Canada-Ouest) - Membres provenaient de la bourgeoisie d’affaires et professions libérales - Montréal, Toronto - Envisageaient
[Show full text]
Summary Perspectives Link Opens in New Window
Summary Perspective The Province of Canada: Canada West John A. Macdonald and his allies mobilized massive support for Confederation. George Brown and his supporters also saw more advantages than drawbacks, although they had some reservations. Representation The province would finally get more representatives to match its growing population. It would therefore carry more political weight within the new Confederation than in the Province of Canada. Prosperity Confederation would create new markets, make the railway companies more profitable and help people enter the territory to settle land in the West. Security Confederation would allow better military protection against the Americans and others. Since the advantages were obvious, 54 of the 62 members of the Legislative Assembly from Canada West voted in favour of ratifying the Confederation initiative. Summary Perspective Province of Canada: Canada East George-Étienne Cartier’s party, the Parti bleu, enthusiastically supported the Confederation initiative. Antoine-Aimé Dorion’s Parti rouge was, however, opposed. Autonomy and Survival The province would maintain control of its language, religion, education system and civil law. The rights of French Canadians would therefore be safe from the English. However, some people were worried about the scope of the federal government’s power. They thought that the French would be outnumbered by the English, and that the religion most Francophones practiced might be threatened by the Protestant religion favoured by most English. Security Confederation would allow better military protection against the Americans and others. Some were scared, however, that the union might make people from other countries angry by provoking them into a fight. If all of the colonies were getting together, other countries might see a threat, and want to deal with it.
[Show full text]
Quebec–US Relations: the Big Picture
American Review of Canadian Studies ISSN: 0272-2011 (Print) 1943-9954 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rarc20 Quebec–US Relations: The Big Picture Stéphane Paquin To cite this article: Stéphane Paquin (2016) Quebec–US Relations: The Big Picture, American Review of Canadian Studies, 46:2, 149-161, DOI: 10.1080/02722011.2016.1185596 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/02722011.2016.1185596 Published online: 12 Aug 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 138 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rarc20 Download by: [École nationale d'administration publique] Date: 29 November 2017, At: 05:39 AMERICAN REVIEW OF CANADIAN STUDIES, 2016 VOL. 46, NO. 2, 149–161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02722011.2016.1185596 Quebec–US Relations: The Big Picture Stéphane Paquin École nationale d’administration publique, Montréal, Canada ABSTRACT KEYWORDS The objective of this article is to propose a periodization of the International policy; Quebec; international policy between Quebec and the United States focus- United States; periodization; ing on two levels of analysis: The first level is interested in public paradiplomacy; paradigm policy instruments such as the opening of delegations, while shift the second focuses on the paradigm of state action. From these two main criteria, I propose an analysis of five periods. The first period (1867–1960) is characterized by the absence of a structured paradigm and the virtual absence of diplomatic instruments with the exception of a tourism and trade office in New York.
[Show full text]
A Concise History of Canada
A Concise History of Canada Margaret Conrad’s history of Canada begins with a challenge to its readers. What is Canada? What makes up this diverse, complex, and often contested nation-state? What was its founding moment? And who are its people? Drawing on her many years of experi- ence as a scholar, writer, and teacher of Canadian history, Conrad offers astute answers to these difficult questions. Beginning in Canada’s deep past with the arrival of its Aboriginal peoples, she traces its history through the conquest by Europeans, the American Revolutionary War, and the industrialization of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, to its prosperous present. As a social historian, Conrad emphasizes the peoples’ history: the relationships between Aboriginal and settler, French and English, Catholic and Protestant, and rich and poor. She writes of the impact of disease, how women fared in the early colonies, and the social transformations that took place after the Second World War as Canada began to assert itself as an independent nation. It is this grounded approach that drives the narrative and makes for compelling reading. In the last chapter, the author explains the social, economic, and political upheavals that have transformed the nation over the last three decades. Despite its successes and its popularity as a destination for immigrants from across the world, Canada remains a curiously reluctant player on the international stage. This intelligent, concise, and lucid book explains just why that is. Margaret Conrad is Professor Emerita at the University of New Brunswick in Canada. Her publications include Atlantic Canada: A History, with James K.
[Show full text]
Denis Coderre Député Libéral De La Circonscription Fédérale De Bourassa
www.uqo.ca/grmm courriel : [email protected] ix questions à… D Denis Coderre député libéral de la circonscription fédérale de Bourassa Le Parti libéral du Canada en bref... Son histoire Union des Clear Grits du Haut-Canada et du Parti rouge du Bas-Canada, le Parti libéral du Canada devint un parti politique officiel au moment de la Confédération en 1867. Parti de centre, ayant presque constamment occupé le pouvoir entre 1900 et 2000, on le désignera comme étant « le parti politique canadien du XXe siècle ». Une traversée du désert s’amorce en 2004 avec le scandale des commandites. À partir de l’élection de 2006, le parti éprouve des difficultés sérieuses au niveau de son leadership. Le 2 mai 2011, le Parti libéral du Canada subit la plus importante défaite électorale de son histoire, avec seulement 34 députés élus. Son chef actuel Nommé suite à la démission de Michael Ignatieff, Bob Rae est le chef intérimaire du Parti libéral du Canada depuis mai 2011. Il est député de la circonscription fédérale de Toronto-Centre. De 1990 à 1995, il fut Premier ministre de l’Ontario, sous la bannière néo-démocrate. Depuis juin 1997, Denis Coderre est député de la circonscription fédérale de Bourassa [nord-est de l’Île-de-Montréal]. Entre 1999 et 2004, sous les gouvernements Chrétien et Martin, il fut, entre autres, secrétaire d’État au Sport amateur, ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration, ministre responsable de la Francophonie et Président du Conseil privé. Depuis mai 2011, il est le porte-parole du Parti libéral du Canada pour le Transport, l’Infrastructure et les Collectivités.
[Show full text]
Georges-Étienne Cartier: the Lion of Québec Teacher’S Guide
Georges-Étienne Cartier: The Lion of Québec Teacher’s Guide This film is ideal for use in high school classes in Canadian and Québec history. Running Time: 27:58 Historical Context Twenty-five years after the events of 1837-1838, the Province of Canada was once again facing a number of problems. Between 1854 and 1864, no fewer than 10 governments came to power. Ministers were playing musical chairs with their portfolios. The dominant political view was conservative. In Canada West, John A. Macdonald was head of the Liberal-Conservative Party (which would shortly drop “Liberal” from its name). The Bleu leader in Canada East was Georges-Étienne Cartier. The other two parties in the Canadian Legislature were the Grits, from Canada West, led by George Brown, and the Parti Rouge of Canada East, led by Antoine-Aimé Dorion. Faced with the inefficiency of the political system put in place in 1840, members of Parliament began to consider a political reorganization. The most frequently discussed plan called for the confederation of the British colonies in North America. Film Synopsis This film highlights Georges-Étienne Cartier’s battle to bring a new system of government to Canada, during the stormy years leading up to Confederation. In 1858, cabinet member Alexander Galt put the idea of a federation to Parliament. Cartier became an avid supporter of the plan. In mid-1864, Parliament was paralyzed by a constitutional crisis. A new and bold initiative was needed to break the impasse. Cartier confronted Macdonald, and his sworn political enemy, Brown — managing to make peace between them.
[Show full text]
The Liberal Party at 150: the Centre Still Holds Thomas S
14 The Liberal Party at 150: The Centre Still Holds Thomas S. Axworthy “I propose the adoption of the rainbow as our emblem. tions since 1867, the Liberal Party has captured more votes than any other. By the endless variety of its tints the rainbow will give In the 19th century, the Conserva- an excellent idea of the diversity of races, religions, tives, led by the vision and wizardry sentiments and interests of the different parts of the of Sir John A. Macdonald, were the dominant party. In the 21st century, Confederation.” the Conservatives and Liberals have been essentially even: holding office — Sir Henri-Gustave Joly de Lotbinière, in the debate in the same amount of time, with the the Legislative Assembly of Canada on the proposed Liberals averaging only 32 per cent of scheme of British North American Confederation, the popular vote in the past decade Quebec, 20 February 1865. and a half. In between, however, in the 20th century, the Liberals were so successful that they became known as “the natural governing party.” As the late political scientist Steven Clark- son quipped, “If the last century did ven as Canada was being born, to this vast kaleidoscope of change, a not belong to Canada, Canada turns diversity was recognized as our willingness to innovate to meet new out to have belonged to the Liberal pre-eminent distinguishing demands or conditions, and creativ- E Party.” characteristic. Joly de Lotbinière, a ity to achieve compromise, or at least member of Parti Rouge, and subse- acceptance, among the thousands of After the First World War and the quently the first Liberal to become active supporters and the millions of extension of the vote to women, premier of Quebec, recognized, too, potential party voters.
[Show full text]
Conquest and Rebellion: the Road to French Canada's Participation in Canadian Confederation Through the Lens of La Survivance
Conquest and Rebellion: The Road to French Canada's Participation in Canadian Confederation through the Lens of La Survivance Sarah Spear in collaboration with Clare Burgham CONQUEST AND REBELLION: THE ROAD TO FRENCH CANADA’S PARTICIPATION IN CANADIAN CONFEDERATION THROUGH THE LENS OF LA SURVIVANCE CAPSTONE SEMINAR SERIES Stains, Stones and Stories: Unsettling Representations of Confederation, Volume 3, Number 1, Spring 2013. Managing Editor Dr. Anne Trépanier Desk-top publishing Shermeen Nizami Editorial Board John-Paul Abelshauser, James Benning, Emma Gooch, Amanda Murphy, Sarah Spear, Ryan Lux, Jessica Helps, Dr. Konstantin Romanov, Dr. Anne Trépanier Special thanks Patrick Lyons, Andrew Barrett, Emma Gooch, Ryan Lux and Sarah Spear Copyright Notice © Sarah Spear, Clare Burgham, April 2013 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy, or transmission of this publication, or part thereof in excess of one paragraph (other than as a PDF file at the discretion of School of Canadian Studies at Carleton University) may be made without the written permission of the author. To quote this article refer to: ― Sarah Spear, in collaboration with Clare Burgham, Conquest and Rebellion: The Road to French Canada’s Participation in Canadian Confederation through the Lens of La Survivance, Stains, Stones and Stories: Unsettling Representations of Confederation, Volume 3, number 1, Spring 2013, page number and date of accession to this website: http://capstoneseminarseries.wordpress.com 2 SARAH SPEAR IN COLLABORATION WITH CLARE BURGHAM Conquest and Rebellion: The Road to French Canada’s Participation in Canadian Confederation through the Lens of La Survivance ABSTRACT The decision by conservative French Canadian politicians to join Canadian Confederation and participate in the Confederation debates of 1864- 1867 was made in an effort to preserve and protect a unique French Canadian nation and identity.
[Show full text]
Sir Wilfrid Laurier Education Guide Timeline
TIMELINE Sir WilfridEDUCATION Laurier GUIDE This Timeline is designed to accompany Historica Canada’s Sir Wilfrid Laurier Education Guide. 1841 Henry-Charles- Wilfrid Laurier 1854 Laurier attends the Collège de L’Assomption is born on 20 November for a classical education. There he discovers in Saint-Lin, Québec ultramontanism (a clerical philosophy within the Catholic (then Canada East). At 1840 Church that emphasizes the prerogatives and powers age 10, Laurier is sent of the Pope), which he detests for the rest of his life. to learn English in New 1841 Glasgow, Québec, where 1854 Moves to Montreal to study law at McGill University. He he learns the value of 1861 tolerance between English aligns with the Parti Rouge, a radical liberal political group. and French cultures. McGill University, Montreal, ca. 1890-1901 (courtesy 1864 Graduates US Library of Congress/LC-DIG-det-4a05369). Mill and falls, New Glasgow, QC, ca. 1900 from McGill (courtesy McCord Museum/MP-1985.31.43). University. During his valedictory address in French (a bold move at McGill, an English 1861 university), Laurier pledges to devote his life “to the cause of Le Défricheur, 7 March 1867. Laurier was the newspaper’s conciliation, harmony publisher from November 1866 until its demise on 21 March, 1867 1864 and concord among the (courtesy Google News Archive). different elements of this country of ours.” Becomes editor of Le Défricheur 1866 newspaper. He is anti-Confederation, 1866 Laurier and his wife, Zoé Lafontaine, Zoé Lafontaine, a fearing political centralization and the assimilation of in a chauffeur-driven car (courtesy Library 1868 French Catholics into an English Protestant nation.
[Show full text]
Sir Wilfrid Laurier Canada’S Seventh Prime Minister
1 Sir Wilfrid Laurier Canada’s seventh prime minister Quick Facts Term(s) of Office: July 11, 1896–October 6, 1911 Born November 20, 1841, Saint-Lin, Canada East (Quebec) Died February 17, 1919, Ottawa, Ontario Grave site: Notre Dame Cemetery, Ottawa, Ontario Education McGill University, B.C.L. 1864 Personal Life Married 1868, Zoé Lafontaine (1841–1921) Occupations Lawyer (called to the bar of Canada East in 1864) 1866–1867 Editor of Le Défricheur 1869–1878 Ensign, Arthabaskaville Infantry 1871–1874 MLA Quebec Political Party Liberal 1887–1919 Party Leader Constituencies 1874–1877 Drummond-Arthabaska, Quebec 1877–1919 Quebec East, Quebec Other Ministries 1877–1878 Inland Revenue 1896–1911 President of the Privy Council Political Record Leader of the Opposition 1887–1896 Adoption of the regulations on the Manitoba Schools Question 1896 Creation of Yukon Territory 1898 Canadian participation in the South African War 1899–1902 Alaska Boundary Dispute 1903 Construction of a second transcontinental railway 1903 Creation of provinces of Saskatchewan and Alberta 1905 Formation of Departments of Labour 1900 and External Affairs 1909 Naval Service Bill 1910 Leader of the Opposition 1911–1919 2 Biography Canada has been modest in its history, although its history, in my estimation, is only commencing. It is commencing in this century. The nineteenth century was the century of the United States. I think we can claim that Canada will fill the twentieth century.—Sir Wilfrid Laurier, January 18, 1904 These words, so familiar to Canadians, sum up the spirit of optimism which characterized Laurier himself, as well as the country during the time he governed.
[Show full text]