DOCSLIB.ORG

2010 PUMA Names File

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2010 PUMA Names File STATEFP PUMA5CE PUMA NAME 01 00100 Lauderdale, Colbert, Franklin & Marion (Northeast) Counties 01 00200 Limestone & Madison (Outer) Counties--Huntsville City (Far West & Southwest) 01 00301 Huntsville (North) & Madison (East) Cities 01 00302 Huntsville City (Central & South) 01 00400 DeKalb & Jackson Counties 01 00500 Marshall & Madison (Southeast) Counties--Huntsville City (Far Southeast) 01 00600 Morgan & Lawrence Counties--Decatur City 01 00700 Cullman & Winston Counties 01 00800 St. Clair & Blount Counties 01 00900 Etowah County 01 01000 Talladega, Cherokee, Randolph, Cleburne & Clay Counties 01 01100 Calhoun County 01 01200 Shelby County 01 01301 Birmingham City (West) 01 01302 Birmingham City (East) 01 01303 Jefferson County (Southeast)--Hoover (North), Vestavia Hills & Homewood Cities 01 01304 Jefferson County (Northeast)--Trussville, Center Point & Gardendale Cities 01 01305 Jefferson County (West)--Bessemer, Hueytown & Pleasant Grove Cities 01 01400 Walker, Marion (South & West), Fayette & Lamar Counties 01 01500 Tuscaloosa (Outer) & Pickens Counties--Northport City (North & West) 01 01600 Tuscaloosa & Northport (Southeast) Cities 01 01700 Dallas, Bibb, Marengo, Hale, Sumter, Perry & Greene Counties 01 01800 Chilton, Tallapoosa, Chambers & Coosa Counties 01 01900 Lee County--Auburn City 01 02000 Montgomery City & Pike Road Town (North) 01 02100 Elmore, Autauga, Montgomery (Outer) & Lowndes Counties 01 02200 Southwest Alabama 01 02300 Coffee, Covington, Butler & Crenshaw Counties 01 02400 Russell, Pike, Barbour, Macon & Bullock Counties 01 02500 Houston, Dale, Geneva & Henry Counties--Dothan City 01 02600 Baldwin County 01 02701 Mobile City (East) 01 02702 Mobile City (West) 01 02703 Mobile County (Outer)--Prichard City, Tillmans Corner & Saraland City 02 00101 Anchorage Municipality (North) 02 00102 Anchorage Municipality (South) 02 00200 Matanuska-Susitna & Kenai Peninsula Boroughs 02 00300 Greater Fairbanks, Greater Juneau, Ketchikan Gateway Borough & Road-Connected Alaska 02 00400 Subsistence Alaska 04 00100 Maricopa County--Gilbert (South) & Queen Creek Towns 04 00101 Maricopa County--Mesa City (East) 04 00102 Maricopa County--Mesa City (North Central) 04 00103 Maricopa County--Mesa City (West) 04 00104 Maricopa County--Mesa City (South Central) 04 00105 Maricopa County--Gilbert Town (North) 04 00106 Maricopa County--Chandler City (Northeast) 04 00107 Maricopa County--Chandler City (South) 04 00108 Maricopa County--Tempe (South) & Chandler (Northwest) Cities 04 00109 Maricopa County--Tempe City (North) 04 00110 Maricopa County--Scottsdale City (Southwest) & Paradise Valley Town 04 00111 Maricopa County (Northeast)--Scottsdale City (Southeast) & Fountain Hills Town 04 00112 Maricopa County--Scottsdale (North), Phoenix (Far Northeast) Cities & Cave Creek 04 00113 Phoenix City (Northeast) 04 00114 Phoenix City (Northeast Central) 04 00115 Phoenix City (Northwest Central) 04 00116 Phoenix City (Uptown) 04 00117 Phoenix City (East) 04 00118 Phoenix City--Downtown & Sky Harbor International Airport 04 00119 Phoenix City (South) 04 00120 Phoenix City--Ahwatukee & South Mountain 04 00121 Phoenix (Southwest) & Tolleson Cities 04 00122 Phoenix City--Maryvale (East) 04 00123 Phoenix City--Maryvale (West) 04 00124 Maricopa County--Glendale City (South) 04 00125 Phoenix City (West) 04 00126 Maricopa County--Glendale City (North) 04 00127 Maricopa County--Peoria City (South & Central) 04 00128 Phoenix City (North) 04 00129 Phoenix (Far North) & Peoria (Northwest) Cities 04 00130 Maricopa County--El Mirage City & Sun City 04 00131 Maricopa County--Surprise City (Central) 04 00132 Maricopa County--Goodyear, Glendale (West) & Litchfield Park (Northwest) Cities 04 00133 Maricopa County--Avondale (Central) & Litchfield Park (Central) Cities 04 00134 Maricopa County (West) & Gila River Indian Community (Northwest) 04 00201 Pima County (West) 04 00202 Tucson (West) & Marana Cities 04 00203 Pima County (North Central)--Oro Valley Town 04 00204 Pima County (Northeast) 04 00205 Pima County (Southeast)--Tucson City (Far Southeast) & Sahuarita Town 04 00206 Tucson City (Northeast) 04 00207 Tucson City (Northwest) 04 00208 Tucson City (South) 04 00209 Tucson City (Southeast) 04 00300 Navajo & Apache Counties 04 00400 Coconino County--Flagstaff City 04 00500 Yavapai County 04 00600 Mohave & La Paz Counties--Lake Havasu City 04 00700 Yuma County--Yuma City 04 00800 Gila, Graham, Greenlee & Pinal (East) Counties 04 00803 Pinal County (North)--Apache Junction City 04 00805 Pinal County (Central)--Florence Town, Eloy (Northeast) & Coolidge Cities 04 00807 Pinal County (West)--Maricopa, Casa Grande & Eloy (Southeast) Cities 04 00900 Cochise & Santa Cruz Counties--Sierra Vista City 05 00100 Benton County 05 00200 Washington County 05 00300 Baxter, Boone, Carroll, Marion, Madison, Newton & Searcy Counties 05 00400 Independence, Cleburne, Van Buren, Sharp, Izard, Stone & Fulton Counties 05 00500 Craighead (West), Greene, Randolph, Lawrence & Clay Counties 05 00600 Crittenden, Mississippi & Craighead (East) Counties 05 00700 St. Francis, Poinsett, Phillips, Cross, Lee & Monroe Counties 05 00800 White, Jackson, Prairie & Woodruff Counties 05 00900 Pulaski County (Outer)--North Little Rock, Sherwood & Jacksonville Cities 05 01000 Pulaski County (Central)--Little Rock City 05 01100 Faulkner & Lonoke Counties 05 01200 Saline County 05 01300 Pope, Johnson, Yell, Conway & Perry Counties 05 01400 Sebastian & Crawford Counties 05 01500 Logan, Polk, Franklin, Sevier, Howard & Scott Counties 05 01600 Garland, Hot Spring, Clark & Montgomery Counties 05 01700 Jefferson, Grant & Arkansas (Northwest) Counties 05 01800 Southeast Arkansas 05 01900 South Central Arkansas 05 02000 Southwest Arkansas 06 00101 Alameda County (North)--Berkeley & Albany Cities 06 00102 Alameda County (Northwest)--Oakland (Northwest) & Emeryville Cities 06 00103 Alameda County (Northeast)--Oakland (East) & Piedmont Cities 06 00104 Alameda County (North Central)--Oakland City (South Central) 06 00105 Alameda County (West)--San Leandro, Alameda & Oakland (Southwest) Cities 06 00106 Alameda County (North Central)--Castro Valley, San Lorenzo & Ashland 06 00107 Alameda County (Central)--Hayward City 06 00108 Alameda County (Southwest)--Union City, Newark & Fremont (West) Cities 06 00109 Alameda County (South Central)--Fremont City (East) 06 00110 Alameda County (East)--Livermore, Pleasanton & Dublin Cities 06 00300 Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, Inyo, Mariposa, Mono & Tuolumne Counties 06 00701 Butte County (Northwest)--Chico City 06 00702 Butte County (Southeast)--Oroville City & Paradise Town 06 01100 Colusa, Glenn, Tehama & Trinity Counties 06 01301 Contra Costa County (Far Southwest)--Richmond (Southwest) & San Pablo Cities 06 01302 Contra Costa County (Far Northwest)--Richmond (North), Hercules & El Cerrito Cites 06 01303 Contra Costa County (Northwest)--Concord (West), Martinez & Pleasant Hill Cities 06 01304 Contra Costa County--Walnut Creek (West), Lafayette, Orinda Cities & Moraga Town 06 01305 Contra Costa County (South)--San Ramon City & Danville Town 06 01306 Contra Costa County (Central)--Concord (South), Walnut Creek (East) & Clayton Cities 06 01307 Contra Costa County (North Central)--Pittsburg & Concord (North & East) Cities 06 01308 Contra Costa County (Northeast)--Antioch City 06 01309 Contra Costa County (East)--Brentwood & Oakley Cities 06 01500 Del Norte, Lassen, Modoc, Plumas & Siskiyou Counties 06 01700 El Dorado County--El Dorado Hills 06 01901 Fresno County (West)--Selma, Kerman & Coalinga Cities 06 01902 Fresno County (North Central)--Fresno City (North) 06 01903 Fresno County (Central)--Fresno City (East Central) 06 01904 Fresno County (Central)--Fresno City (Southwest) 06 01905 Fresno County (Central)--Fresno City (Southeast) 06 01906 Fresno County (Central)--Clovis City 06 01907 Fresno County (East)--Sanger, Reedley & Parlier Cities 06 02300 Humboldt County 06 02500 Imperial County--El Centro City 06 02901 Kern County (West)--Delano, Wasco & Shafter Cities 06 02902 Kern County (Central)--Bakersfield City (West) 06 02903 Kern County (Central)--Bakersfield City (Northeast) 06 02904 Kern County (Central)--Bakersfield City (Southeast) 06 02905 Kern County (East)--Ridgecrest, Arvin, Tehachapi & California City Cities 06 03100 Kings County--Hanford City 06 03300 Lake & Mendocino Counties 06 03701 Los Angeles County (North/Unincorporated)--Castaic 06 03702 Los Angeles County (Northwest)--Santa Clarita City 06 03703 Los Angeles County (North Central)--Lancaster City 06 03704 Los Angeles County (North Central)--Palmdale City 06 03705 Los Angeles County (North)--LA City (Northwest/Chatsworth & Porter Ranch) 06 03706 Los Angeles County (North)--LA City (North Central/Granada Hills & Sylmar) 06 03707 Los Angeles County--LA (North Central/Arleta & Pacoima) & San Fernando Cities 06 03708 Los Angeles County (North)--LA City (Northeast/Sunland, Sun Valley & Tujunga) 06 03709 Los Angeles County (Central)--San Gabriel Valley Region (North) 06 03710 Los Angeles County--Baldwin Park, Azusa, Duarte & Irwindale Cities 06 03711 Los Angeles County (East Central)--Glendora, Claremont, San Dimas & La Verne Cities 06 03712 Los Angeles County (East Central)--Pomona City 06 03713 Los Angeles County (East Central)--Covina & Walnut Cities 06 03714 Los Angeles County--Diamond Bar, La Habra Heights (East) Cities & Rowland Heights 06 03715 Los Angeles County (East Central)--West Covina City 06 03716 Los Angeles County (East Central)--La Puente & Industry Cities 06 03717 Los Angeles County (East
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Copy of Censusdata
    P. 30 Means of Transportation to Work for workers 16 years and over [16] City State Total: Bicycle % who bicycle Mackinac Island city Michigan 217 132 60.83% Stanford CDP California 5,711 2,381 41.69% Tangier town Virginia 250 66 26.40% Mason village Wisconsin 21 5 23.81% Ocean Beach village New York 64 14 21.88% Sand City city California 132 28 21.21% Isla Vista CDP California 8,360 1,642 19.64% Unity Village village Missouri 153 29 18.95% Hunter city Kansas 31 5 16.13% Crested Butte town Colorado 1,096 176 16.06% Davis city California 31,165 4,493 14.42% Rocky Ridge town Utah 160 23 14.38% Pelican city Alaska 77 11 14.29% Key West city Florida 14,611 1,856 12.70% Saltaire village New York 24 3 12.50% Keenes village Illinois 41 5 12.20% Longville city Minnesota 42 5 11.90% Stock Island CDP Florida 2,152 250 11.62% Goodland CDP Florida 74 8 10.81% Agenda city Kansas 28 3 10.71% Volant borough Pennsylvania 56 6 10.71% Tenakee Springs city Alaska 39 4 10.26% Tumacacori-Carmen C Arizona 199 20 10.05% Bearcreek town Montana 52 5 9.62% Briny Breezes town Florida 84 8 9.52% Barada village Nebraska 21 2 9.52% Layton city Florida 117 11 9.40% Evansville CDP Alaska 22 2 9.09% Nimrod city Minnesota 22 2 9.09% Nimrod city Minnesota 22 2 9.09% San Geronimo CDP California 245 22 8.98% Smith Island CDP Maryland 148 13 8.78% Laie CDP Hawaii 2,103 176 8.37% Hickam Housing CDP Hawaii 2,386 196 8.21% Slickville CDP Pennsylvania 112 9 8.04% Laughlin AFB CDP Texas 1,150 91 7.91% Minidoka city Idaho 38 3 7.89% Sykeston city North Dakota 51 4 7.84% Shipshewana town Indiana 310 24 7.74% Playita comunidad (Sa Puerto Rico 145 11 7.59% Dillard city Georgia 94 7 7.45% Putnam town Oklahoma 27 2 7.41% Fire Island CDP New York 191 14 7.33% Shorewood Hills village Wisconsin 779 57 7.32% Grenora city North Dakota 97 7 7.22% Buffalo Gap town South Dakota 56 4 7.14% Corvallis city Oregon 23,475 1,669 7.11% Boulder city Colorado 53,828 3,708 6.89% Gunnison city Colorado 2,825 189 6.69% Chistochina CDP Alaska 30 2 6.67% Grand Canyon Village Arizona 1,059 70 6.61% P.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Left History 8.1 77 "An Unholy Alliance": Irish-Americans and the Political Construction of Whiteness in Memphis, Tennessee, 1866-1879 Brian D. Page "Why this cry of nationality and race?" the Memphis Daily Appeal lamented, as the city prepared for the impending municipal election to occur on 2 January, 1874. Despite Redemption in Tennessee in 1870, Memphis conservatives were unable to control the local political scene. A cross-racial alliance composed of voting constituents from the Irish and African American, and to some extent German, communities formed a powerful voting bloc dictating city elections and, therefore, threatening supremacy of the native elite. As a result, whiteness emerged as a political battleground for the local Democratic Party. This article seeks to contribute to the evolving scholarship known as "whiteness studies," which seeks to objectify whiteness and makes much more apparent the social construction of a white identity. By tracing voting behavior in Memphis, local politics demonstrates the need to confront race as a power relationship. In Memphis, Irish immigrants and Irish Americans were conflicted between their racial identity of whiteness versus their worlung class identity as they sought to extend political power garnered during the Civil War and Reconstruction. As a result, white political leaders and the conservative press were forced to consid- er a new definition of whiteness that included Irish Americans, in order to cement the economic and social dominance of the native, elite white popula- tion. Whiteness was politically constructed to the extent it solidified white con- trol versus the abhorrent alternative of black domination and working class sol- idarity.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnóstico Socioambiental Para El Programa Del Manejo Integral Del Agua De La Cuenca Del Río Tijuana
    Diagnóstico socioambiental para el Programa del Manejo Integral del Agua de la Cuenca del Río Tijuana Diagnóstico socioambiental para el Programa del Manejo Integral del Agua de la Cuenca del Río Tijuana Elaborado por: El Colegio de la Frontera Norte Coordinador Carlos A. de la Parra Rentería Colaboradores Mayra Patricia Melgar López Alfonso Camberos Urbina Tijuana, Baja California, 15 de marzo de 2017. i TABLA DE CONTENIDO PARTE I. MARCO DE REFERENCIA .......................................................... 1 UBICACIÓN, DELIMITACIÓN Y DESCRIPCIÓN GENERAL DE LA REGIÓN ................................................................. 1 La Cuenca del Río Tijuana .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Antecedentes Históricos .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Localización ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Descripción de los municipios y el condado que integran la CRT ..................................................................................... 5 Características físicas ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 POBLACIÓN EN LA CRT ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cross Border Survey
    THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents T ABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents. i List of Tables . iii List of Figures. iv Introduction. 1 Motivation for Study . 1 Overview of Methodology . 1 Organization of Report. 3 Acknowledgments . 3 Disclaimer . 3 About True North . 3 Key Findings . 4 Cross-border trips originate close to the border in México.. 4 Trip destinations in the U.S. cluster close to the border. 4 Shopping is the most common reason for crossing the border. 4 The average crosser visits multiple destinations in the U.S. and for a mix of reasons. 4 Most U.S. destinations are reached by driving alone or in a carpool. 5 The typical U.S. visit lasts less than one day. 5 Proximity to the border also shapes U.S. resident trips to México. 5 U.S. residents generally visit México to socialize. 5 The average México visit lasts two days.. 6 Interest in using the Otay Mesa East tolled border crossing was conditioned by several factors. 6 The current study findings are similar to the 2010 study findings . 6 México Resident: U.S. Trip Details. 8 Trip Origin in México . 8 Primary Destination in United States. 10 Primary U.S. Trip Purpose . 10 Duration of U.S. Visit . 12 Miles traveled in U.S. 13 Number of Destinations in the U.S.. 14 Time of Stops in U.S. 14 Duration of Stops in U.S. 18 Location of Destinations in San Diego County. 21 Purpose of Stops in San Diego County . 28 Mode of Travel in San Diego County .
    [Show full text]
  • Ir a →R E Q U I S I T
    No. 34 Descripción del servicio Nombre del servicio: SUSPENSIÓN TEMPORAL DEL SERVICIO (CONOCIDO COMÚNMENTE COMO BAJA DE CUENTA) Ir a R E Q U I S I T O S Tiempo de respuesta: Variable Costos aplicables $ 500 pesos Se paga el importe por concepto de retiro de medidor y/o taponeo de toma. Cuando el usuario reactive su cuenta, el trámite no tendrá costo alguno. De acuerdo al décimo párrafo del ARTÍCULO 9 de la Ley de Ingresos del Estado de Baja California, vigente: Las tarifas y cuotas contenidas en cada una de las secciones de este Capítulo, se actualizarán mensualmente, a partir del mes de febrero, con el factor que se obtenga de dividir el Índice Nacional de Precios al Consumidor, que se publique en el Diario Oficial de la Federación por el Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, o por la dependencia federal que en sustitución de ésta lo publique, del último mes inmediato anterior al mes por el cual se hace el ajuste, entre el citado índice del penúltimo mes inmediato anterior al del mismo mes que se actualiza. Objetivo del servicio Suspensión temporal de los servicios es para aquellos usuarios que no requieran de los mismos. Área responsable: Coordinación Comercial correspondiente. Coordinación que realiza el Centro de Atención al Público correspondiente. servicio: Comprobante a obtener: Documento del pago del trámite. Vigencia: No aplica. Artículo 9, párrafo 7, de la Ley de Ingresos del Estado de Baja California para el ejercicio Fundamento jurídico: fiscal del año 2021, publicada en el Periódico Oficial del Estado de Baja California en fecha 28 de diciembre de 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 San Diego
    BINATIONAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PREVENTION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA AND THE CITY OF TIJUANA, BAJA CALIFORNIA January 14, 2013 Binational Hazardous Materials Prevention and Emergency Response Plan Among the County Of San Diego, the City of San Diego, California, and the City of Tijuana, Baja California January 14, 2013 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2005-Present ...................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2003 .................................................................................................... 6 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................... 10 PARTICIPATING AGENCIES................................................................................................... 17 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 23 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 23 1.0 TIJUANA/SAN DIEGO BORDER REGION ................................................................. 25 1.1 General Aspects of the Region ........................................................................................ 25 1.1.1 Historical and Cultural Background ................................................................ 25 1.1.2 Geographic Location
    [Show full text]
  • Water, Capitalism, and Urbanization in the Californias, 1848-1982
    TIJUANDIEGO: WATER, CAPITALISM, AND URBANIZATION IN THE CALIFORNIAS, 1848-1982 A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Hillar Yllo Schwertner, M.A. Washington, D.C. August 14, 2020 Copyright 2020 by Hillar Yllo Schwertner All Rights Reserved ii TIJUANDIEGO: WATER, CAPITALISM, AND URBANIZATION IN THE CALIFORNIAS, 1848-1982 Hillar Yllo Schwertner, M.A. Dissertation Advisor: John Tutino, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This is a history of Tijuandiego—the transnational metropolis set at the intersection of the United States, Mexico, and the Pacific World. Separately, Tijuana and San Diego constitute distinct but important urban centers in their respective nation-states. Taken as a whole, Tijuandiego represents the southwestern hinge of North America. It is the continental crossroads of cultures, economies, and environments—all in a single, physical location. In other words, Tijuandiego represents a new urban frontier; a space where the abstractions of the nation-state are manifested—and tested—on the ground. In this dissertation, I adopt a transnational approach to Tijuandiego’s water history, not simply to tell “both sides” of the story, but to demonstrate that neither side can be understood in the absence of the other. I argue that the drawing of the international boundary in 1848 established an imbalanced political ecology that favored San Diego and the United States over Tijuana and Mexico. The land and water resources wrested by the United States gave it tremendous geographical and ecological advantages over its reeling southern neighbor, advantages which would be used to strengthen U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Governing the Mexican Drug War: a Political Geography of Public Security and the Organisation of Everyday Violence
    Governing the Mexican Drug War: A Political Geography of Public Security and the Organisation of Everyday Violence Hector Eduardo Bezares Buenrostro School of Geography, Politics, and Sociology Newcastle University A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Geography, Politics, and Sociology at Newcastle University May 2018 ABSTRACT To make a contribution to the literature on governmentality and space, this thesis asks how does the War on Drugs (WoD) in Mexico produce spaces within which individual subjects are formed and controlled? More specifically, it demonstrates how the spatial organization of the northern border city of Tijuana and the aims of the WoD constitute distinctive identity formations and policing practices. Thus, the thesis advances the understanding of how urban space in Mexico has been imagined as a battlefield, shaping the territorial deployment of federal security personnel, and the military policing of strategic urban centres. To make this contribution, the thesis focuses on three concepts that are at the core of the analysis of governmentality: government, power, and space. Drawing on Foucauldian discourse analysis and four months of ethnographic fieldwork in Mexico, the everyday intimate spaces of the WoD ground the analysis of key geographical imaginaries and the spatial practices of security personnel and ordinary residents of Tijuana. Overall, the thesis underscores the centrality of controlling urban spaces for the WoD, showing how this has been achieved from individual households to the streets. In drawing attention to the spatiality of the WoD, the thesis thus offers a critical account of how entire territories and groups of people in Mexico, irrespective of their social class or ethnicity, have become subjects of an overarching project to discipline and kill.
    [Show full text]
  • Comisión Internacional De Límites Y Aguas Entre México Y Los Estados Unidos
    Comisión Internacional de Límites y Aguas entre México y los Estados Unidos INFORME ANUAL 2008 PORTADA: Confluencia de los Ríos Bravo y Conchos durante la avenida del 2008. COMISION INTERNACIONAL DE LIMITES Y AGUAS ENTRE MEXICO Y LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS “La jurisdicción de la Comisión se ejercerá sobre los tramos limítrofes del Río Bravo (Grande) y del río Colorado, sobre la línea divisoria terrestre entre los dos países, y sobre las obras construidas en aquellos y en ésta. Cada una de las Secciones tendrá jurisdicción sobre la parte de las obras situadas dentro de los límites de su nación…” Artículo 2, Tratado de Aguas Internacionales de 1944 Comisión Internacional de Límites y Aguas entre México y los Estados Unidos MENSAJE DE LA COMISIÓN La Comisión Internacional de Límites y Aguas entre México y los Estados Unidos (CILA), experimentó una tragedia inédita en el 2008 con los decesos del Comisionado mexicano Arturo Herrera y el Comisionado estadounidense Carlos Marín. El 15 de septiembre, ambos Comisionados se dirigían a inspeccionar las avenidas del Río Bravo y del Río Conchos cuando el pequeño avión alquilado en el que ellos eran pasajeros, se estrelló contra las montañas en las proximidades de Ojinaga, Chihuahua – Presidio, Texas . Ambos Comisionados habían dedicado sus carreras a la Comisión y su inoportuna muerte representa una pérdida irremplazable de experiencia y conocimiento, no sólo para la Comisión, sino para toda la comunidad fronteriza en conjunto. Arturo Herrera ejerció como Comisionado mexicano desde 1989, aún y cuando fue Funcionario de la Comisión desde 1982, ocupando los puestos de Ingeniero Principal, Secretario, y Representante de la Oficina en Tijuana, Baja California.
    [Show full text]
  • Comisión Inter Comisión Internacional De Nacional De Límites Y Aguas
    Comisión Internacional de Límites y Aguas entre México y los Estados Unidos INFORME ANUAL 2007 PORTADA: Presa de La Amistad en el Río Bravo COMISION INTERNACIONAL DE LIMITES Y AGUAS ENTRE MEXICO Y LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS “La jurisdicción de la Comisión se ejercerá sobre los tramos limítrofes del Río Bravo (Grande) y del río Colorado, sobre la línea divisoria terrestre entre los dos países, y sobre las obras construidas en aquellos y en ésta. Cada una de las Secciones tendrá jurisdicción sobre la parte de las obras situadas dentro de los límites de su nación…” Artículo 2, Tratado de Aguas Internacionales de 1944 Comisión Internacional de Límites y Aguas entre México y los Estados Unidos MENSAJE DE LA COMISIÓN La Comisión Internacional de Límites y Aguas entre México y Estados Unidos (CILA), es un Organismo Internacional creado por ambos Gobiernos con el fin de vigilar el cumplimiento y la aplicación de los Tratados de Límites y Aguas entre los dos países, así como para resolver las diferencias que se pudieran suscitar en la aplicación de los mismos. Durante 2007 la CILA, en cumplimiento de las atribuciones que le son conferidas en los Tratados de referencia, llevó a cabo diversas actividades que incluyen la demarcación de la línea divisoria, la operación y mantenimiento de las presas internacionales, la contabilidad de las aguas internacionales, el mantenimiento de los proyectos de control de avenidas y la operación de los proyectos internacionales de saneamiento. De manera relevante, la Comisión en octubre de 2007, con el apoyo de las autoridades de ambos gobiernos, estuvo en posibilidad de cerrar sin déficit, el ciclo de asignaciones de agua del Río Bravo de México a Estados Unidos 2002 - 2007 conforme a los términos del Artículo 4 del Tratado de Aguas de 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • Rehabilitación Del Colector Oriente En Tijuana, Baja California
    PROYECTO DOCUMENTO DEL CONSEJO BD 2020-## PROPUESTA DE CERTIFICACIÓN REHABILITACIÓN DEL COLECTOR ORIENTE EN TIJUANA, BAJA CALIFORNIA Publicada:26 de junio de 2020 PROYECTO DOCUMENTO DEL CONSEJO BD 2020-XX PROPUESTA DE CERTIFICACIÓN TIJUANA, B.C. ÍNDICE RESUMEN EJECUTIVO ..................................................................................................................... 1 1. OBJETIVO Y RESULTADOS ESPERADOS DEL PROYECTO ........................................................ 3 2. ELEGIBILIDAD .......................................................................................................................... 3 2.1. Tipo de proyecto............................................................................................................ 3 2.2. Ubicación del proyecto .................................................................................................. 3 2.3. Project Sponsor and Legal Authority ............................................................................. 4 3. CRITERIOS DE CERTIFICACIÓN ................................................................................................ 4 3.1. Criterios técnicos ........................................................................................................... 4 3.1.1. Perfil general de la comunidad ............................................................................ 4 3.1.2. Alcance del proyecto ........................................................................................... 7 3.1.3. Factibilidad técnica .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Redeeming Tennessee, 1869-1870
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2013 "Fare well to all Radicals": Redeeming Tennessee, 1869-1870 William Edward Hardy University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Legal Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Hardy, William Edward, ""Fare well to all Radicals": Redeeming Tennessee, 1869-1870. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2013. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2432 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by William Edward Hardy entitled ""Fare well to all Radicals": Redeeming Tennessee, 1869-1870." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in History. Stephen V. Ash, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Daniel Feller, Ernest Freeberg, Michael R. Fitzgerald Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) “FARE WELL TO ALL RADICALS”: REDEEMING TENNESSEE, 1869-1870 A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville William Edward Hardy August 2013 Copyright © 2013 by William E.
    [Show full text]