DOCSLIB.ORG

Sandia Crest Plants-Summer.Pages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sandia Crest Plants-Summer.Pages Sandia Crest plants in flower: July–September 85 species (page numbers for Ivey) 1. Achillea millefolium – Yarrow (p. 126) 2. Actaea rubra–Banebery (fruit) 3. Agastache pallidiflora ssp. nm – NM Giant Hyssop (p. 308) 4. Agoseris aurantiaca – Burnt-orange Dandelion (p. 97) 5. Aletes acaulis – Mt. Caraway (p. 81) 6. Allium geyeri – Wild Onion (p. 470) 7. Anticlea elegans–Death Camas (p. 469) 8. Apocynum androsaemifolium–Dogbane (mid-elev roadsides) 9. Aquilegia desertorum – Red Columbine (p. 387) 10. Arenaria fendleri – Fendler Sandwort (p. 227) 11. Artemisia ludoviciana – Wormwood (p. 177) 12. Artemesia franserioides – Ragweed Sagebrush (p. 175) 13. Asclepias subverticillata–Poison Milkweed (p. 88) (low-elev roadsides) 14. Calochortus gunnisonii – Gunnison Mariposa Lily (p. 473) 15. Campanula rotundifolia – Harebell (p. 220) 16. Castilleja miniata – Indian Paintbrush (p. 423) 17. Cirsium ochrocentrum– Yellow-spined Thistle (p. 119) 18. Cirsium undulatum – Wavyleaf Thistle (p. 120) 19. Clematis columbiana – Rocky Mt. Clematis (p. 389) [in seed] 20. Cosmos parviflorus – Wild Cosmos (low elev. roadside) (p. 127) 21. Cymorpterus lemonii (Pseudocymopterus montanus) – Mt. Parsley (p. 82) 22. Delphinium sapellonis – Sapello Canyon Larkspur (p. 394) 23. Draba helleriana – Twisted-Pod Draba (p. 197) 24. Dracocephalum parviflorum – Dragonhead (p. 308) 25. Erigeron vreelaqnderi–Rough-leaf Fleabane 26. Erigeron speciosus – Alpine Fleabane Daisy (p. 132) 27. Erigeron subtrinervis – Three-nerved Daisy (p. 131) 28. Erysimum capitatum – Western Wallflower (orange) (p. 202) 29. Frasera speciosa–Monument Plant 30. Galium boreale – Northern bedstraw (p. 412) 31. Geranium caespitosum – Purple Geranium (p. 299) 32. Geranium richardsonii – Richardson Geranium (p. 299) 33. Grindelia squarrosa – Curlycup Gumweed (p. 115, 145) 34. Helianthella quinquenervis –Wood Sunflower (p. 148) 35. Heliomeris multiflora – Showy Goldeneye (p. 173) 36. Heterotheca villosa – Hairy Golden Aster (p. 150) 37. Heuchera pulchella – Sandia Mt. Coral Bells (p. 420) 38. Holodiscus dumosus – Mountain Spray (p. 408) 39. Hymenoxys richardsonii – Bitterweed, Rubberweed (p.166) 40. Ipomopsis aggrega – Skyrocket (mid-elev roadsides) ( p. 355) 41. Jamesia americana – Cliffbush (p. 419) 42. Lathyrus lanszwertii–White Pea Vine 43. Ligusticum porteri – Osha (flower + seed) 44. Melilotus officinalis – Yellow Sweet Clover (p. 291) (mid-elev roadsides) 45. Mirabilis albida – Velvet Four-O’clock (p. 333) 46. Moehringa macrophylla – Bigleaf Sandwort (p. 228) 47. Oreochrysum parryi – Parry’s Goldenrod 48. Osmorhiza depauperata–Sweet Cicely (seed) 49. Oxalis violacea – Violet Woodsorrrel (p. 347) 50. Oxytropis lambertii – Purple Locoweed (p. 285) 51. Packera fendleri – Notchleaf Groundsel (p.158) 52. Pedicularis procera – Fernleaf Lousewort (p. 429) 53. Penstemon barbaratus – Scarlet Penstemon (p.436) 54. Penstemon inflatus – White-throated Penstemon (p. 428) 55. Penstemon strictus – Rocky Mt. Penstemon (p. 439) 56. Penstemon whippleanus – Dusky Penstemon (p. 441) 57. Philadelphus microphyllus – Mockorange (p. 302) 58. Physocarpus monogynus – Ninebark (p. 408) 59. Polemonium brandegeei – Yellow Sky Pilot (p. 357) 60. Polemonium foliosissimum – Jacob’s Ladder (p. 357) 61. Potentilla concinna–Elegant Cinquefoil 62. Potentilla hippiana – Woolly Cinquefoil (p. 404) 63. Potentilla pulcherrima – Pretty Cinquefoil (p. 404) 64. Pseudostellaria jamesiana – Tuber Starwort (p. 228) 65. Robinia neomexicana–New Mexico Locust 66. Rosa woodsii – Wood’s Rose (p. 402) 67. Sambucus racemosa–Red Elderberry (fruit) 68. Scrophularia montana – Mountain Figwort (p. 445) 69. Senecio eremophilus – Cutleaf Groundsel (p. 161) 70. Senecio fendleri–Fendler’s Groundsel 71. Silene noctiflora – Night-flowering catchfly (p. 231) 72. Soidago missouriensis/nemoralis – Goldenrod 73. Solidago wrightii – Goldenrod (p. 162) 74. Sphaeralcea sp. – Globemallow (low-elev roadsides) 75. Symphoricarpos rotundifolius–Round-leaf Snowberry 76. Taraxacum officinale – Dandelion 77. Tetraneuris acaulis–Stemless Rubberweed 78. Tetraneuris richardsonii–Bitterweed 79. Thalictrum fendleri–Fendler’s Meadow-rue 80. Townsendia eximia–Tall Easter Daisy (p. 129) 81. Trifolium dasyphyllum – Alpine Clover (p. 288) 82. Verbena macdougalii – Spike Verbena (low-elev roadsides) 83. Valeriana edulis – Tobacco Root (p. 455) 84. Vicia americana–American Vetch 85. Viola canadensis – White Violet .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Survey and Analysis of Plant Community Types of Writing-On-Stone Provincial Park
    Survey and Analysis of Plant Community Types of Writing-on-Stone Provincial Park Survey and Analysis of Plant Community Types of Writing-on-Stone Provincial Park FINAL REPORT Prepared for Alberta Sustainable Resource Development Resource Data Branch Edmonton, Alberta Prepared by Wildlands Ecological Consulting Ltd. #60 Neal Close, Red Deer, AB T4P 1N4 Office: (403) 346-1057 Fax: (403) 346-3257 March 29, 2004 ABSTRACT Identification and monitoring of biological diversity in Alberta is the primary mandate of Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre (ANHIC). A fundamental strategy in the preservation of functional ecosystems is to identify and preserve a full compliment of habitat types, which in return support a diversity of animals, plants, and other life forms. Vegetation is an integral component of habitat and provides a relatively easy means of inventory and monitoring of ecosystem health both spatially and temporally. The current study, in Writing-on-Stone Provincial Park, focuses on the identification of unique riparian and coulee plant associations, or plant community type. The study area is situated approximately 8 km north of the USA border and 40 km east of the town of Milk River and occurs at the interface between the Mixedgrass and Dry Mixedgrass Natural Subregions. Priority research is currently required to address gaps in the identification, description and distribution of plant associations within the coulee and riparian zones of these Subregions. Many of these communities recur over the landscape but may occur as very small patches of 1m2 or less. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development (ASRD) Resource Data Division contracted Wildlands Ecological to complete an inventory of natural/semi-natural plant communities, statistically analyse the data, and describe potential plant community or association types.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants and a Brief History of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands
    United States Department of Agriculture Vascular Plants and a Brief Forest Service Rocky Mountain History of the Kiowa and Rita Research Station General Technical Report Blanca National Grasslands RMRS-GTR-233 December 2009 Donald L. Hazlett, Michael H. Schiebout, and Paulette L. Ford Hazlett, Donald L.; Schiebout, Michael H.; and Ford, Paulette L. 2009. Vascular plants and a brief history of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS- GTR-233. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 44 p. Abstract Administered by the USDA Forest Service, the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands occupy 230,000 acres of public land extending from northeastern New Mexico into the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas. A mosaic of topographic features including canyons, plateaus, rolling grasslands and outcrops supports a diverse flora. Eight hundred twenty six (826) species of vascular plant species representing 81 plant families are known to occur on or near these public lands. This report includes a history of the area; ethnobotanical information; an introductory overview of the area including its climate, geology, vegetation, habitats, fauna, and ecological history; and a plant survey and information about the rare, poisonous, and exotic species from the area. A vascular plant checklist of 816 vascular plant taxa in the appendix includes scientific and common names, habitat types, and general distribution data for each species. This list is based on extensive plant collections and available herbarium collections. Authors Donald L. Hazlett is an ethnobotanist, Director of New World Plants and People consulting, and a research associate at the Denver Botanic Gardens, Denver, CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Bryce
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 ON THE COVER Matted prickly-phlox (Leptodactylon caespitosum), Bryce Canyon National Park, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Sarah Topp Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 January 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lakeside Daisy Hymenoxys Herbacea
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Lakeside Daisy Hymenoxys herbacea in Canada THREATENED 2002 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION DES ENDANGERED WILDLIFE IN ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: Please note: Persons wishing to cite data in the report should refer to the report (and cite the author(s)); persons wishing to cite the COSEWIC status will refer to the assessment (and cite COSEWIC). A production note will be provided if additional information on the status report history is required. COSEWIC 2002. COSEWIC assessment and status report the lakeside daisy Hymenoxys herbacea in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 24 pp. Campbell, L.B. Husband and M.J. Oldham 2002. COSEWIC status report on the lakeside daisy Hymenoxys herbacea in Canada, in COSEWIC assessment and status report the lakeside daisy Hymenoxys herbacea in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-24 pp. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Évaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur l’hyménoxys herbacé (Hymenoxys herbacea) au Canada Cover illustration: Lakeside Daisy — Illustration by Jack Wellington Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2003 Catalogue No.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Figure 1: Diameter Distributions-East Fork Units
    Appendix A Figure 1: Diameter Distributions-East Fork Units East Fork Control Unit East Fork Goshawk Guidelines Unit East Fork Evidence-based Ecological Restoration Unit Figure 2: Diameter Distributions-Redondo Units Redondo Control Unit Redondo Goshawk Guidelines Unit Redondo Evidence-based Ecological Restoration Unit Figure 3: FlamMap Simulated Crown Fire Behavior: East Fork Project Area 20 mph Southwest Wind 25 mph 30 mph 35 mph 40 mph Map Legend Crown Fire Activity N No crown fire Passive crown activity fire (torching) Active crown fire (spreading) Important Note: Expected Crown Fire Behavior by Percent The 97th percentile of low fuel of Project Area moistures for June from 34 No Crown Passive years of data from the Kaibab Fire Crown Fire Active National Forest, Arizona were used in all simulations. This Windspeed Activity (torching) Crown Fire 20 79.9 0.9 19.2 input represents potential 25 71.2 1.9 26.9 extremes of fire weather during the peak of the fire 30 64.9 2.9 32.3 season, not average fire 35 57.3 4.7 38.0 season conditions. 40 48.7 9.4 42.0 Figure 4: FlamMap Simulated Crown Fire Behavior: Redondo Project Area 20 mph Southwest Wind 25 mph 30 mph 35 mph 40 mph Map Legend Crown Fire Activity N Highway 4 Valles Caldera No crown fire Passive crown activity entrance road fire (torching) Active crown fire (spreading) Important Note: Expected Crown Fire Behavior by Percent The 97th percentile of low fuel of Project Area moistures for June from 34 Passive years of data from the Kaibab No Crown Crown Fire Active Crown National Forest, Arizona were Windspeed Fire Activity (torching) Fire used in all simulations.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Plants for Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve
    Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve Plant Checklist DRAFT as of 29 November 2005 FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Equisetaceae (Horsetail Family) Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense Present in Park Rare Native Field horsetail Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum laevigatum Present in Park Unknown Native Scouring-rush Polypodiaceae (Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Cystopteris fragilis Present in Park Uncommon Native Brittle bladderfern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Woodsia oregana Present in Park Uncommon Native Oregon woodsia Pteridaceae (Maidenhair Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Argyrochosma fendleri Present in Park Unknown Native Zigzag fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cheilanthes feei Present in Park Uncommon Native Slender lip fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cryptogramma acrostichoides Present in Park Unknown Native American rockbrake Selaginellaceae (Spikemoss Family) Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella densa Present in Park Rare Native Lesser spikemoss Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella weatherbiana Present in Park Unknown Native Weatherby's clubmoss CONIFERS Cupressaceae (Cypress family) Vascular Plant Pinales Cupressaceae Juniperus scopulorum Present in Park Unknown Native Rocky Mountain juniper Pinaceae (Pine Family) Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies concolor var. concolor Present in Park Rare Native White fir Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies lasiocarpa Present
    [Show full text]
  • Climate and Floristic Variation in Great Basin Mountain Ranges
    David A. Charlet and Pat Leary College of Southern Nevada Funding and other support for this work: Nevada Climate Change Infrastructure for Climate Change Research, Education, and Outreach Clark County Ecosystem Indicators Project (Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act) US Geological Survey USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service US Fish and Wildlife Service Bureau of Land Management College of Southern Nevada Wesley E. Niles Herbarium, UNLV Premier location to study climate change Paleoclimate proxy data sets: Biological: fossil, pollen, woodrat midden Geomorphological: pluvial lake shores and basins, sand dunes, glacial and periglacial features Presence of all major temperate life-zones except Humid Transition Understanding our flora requires the context of climate change, isolation of populations, and refugia Hunt 1967 Plant species have specific tolerances for conditions and resource availability (e.g., temperature, nutrients, water) Vary one of the conditions (climate), and the distributions of the plants should change To detect changes in vegetation as it responds to changes in climate, we must first know where the vegetation is now We don’t know very well how species are distributed We must develop the baseline data Charlet Billings (1951) Merriam (1898) Alpine Alpine tundra MZS Arctic-Alpine Subalpine Limber pine-bristlecone pine MZS Hudsonian Montane Yellow pine-White fir MZS Canadian Pygmy Conifer Pinyon-juniper MZS Upper Sonoran Sagebrush Sagebrush-grass Upper Sonoran Blackbrush Creosote-bush Lower Sonoran
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Community Composition and Structure Monitoring for Agate Fossil Beds National Monument 2011-2015 Summary Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Plant Community Composition and Structure Monitoring for Agate Fossil Beds National Monument 2011-2015 Summary Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NGPN/NRR—2016/1198 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of riparian long-term monitoring plot 261 at Agate Fossil Beds National Monument, 2015. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of plant community monitoring at Agate Fossil Beds National Monument, 2015. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. Plant Community Composition and Structure Monitoring for Agate Fossil Beds National Monument 2011-2015 Summary Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NGPN/NRR—2016/1198 Isabel W. Ashton Christopher J. Davis National Park Service Northern Great Plains Inventory & Monitoring Network 231 East St. Joseph Street Rapid City, SD 57701 April 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mexico Range Plants
    New Mexico Range Plants Circular 374 Revised by Christopher D. Allison and Nick Ashcroft1 Cooperative Extension Service • College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences New Mexico contains almost 78 million acres, more than 90 percent of which is in native vegetation grazed by domestic livestock and wildlife. The kinds of plants that grow on a range, along with their quality and quan- tity, determine its value. A successful rancher knows the plants on his or her range. There are more than 3,000 species of plants in New Mexico. The 85 discussed here are most important to the livestock industry. Most of these are native plants. RANGELAND AREAS OF NEW MEXICO Figure 1 represents the major rangeland areas in New Mexico. The northern desert, western plateau, and high valley areas are enough alike to be described together, as are the central and high plains areas and the southern desert and basin. Southern Desert and Basin 36 - New Mexico and Arizona Plateaus and Mesas 37 - San Juan River Valley, mesas and Plateaus The southern desert and basin occupies much of south- 39 - Arizona and New Mexico Mountains 41 - Southeastern Arizona Basin and Range 42 - Southern Desertic Basins, Plains and Mountains ern New Mexico at elevations between 3,000 and 5,000 48 - Southern Rocky Mountains 51 - High Intermountain Valleys feet. This area follows the Rio Grande north into the 70 - Pecos/Canadian Plains and Valleys southern part of Sandoval County. 77 - Southern High Plains Some of the most common plants are creosote bush (Larrea tridentata [DC.] Coville), mesquite (Prosopis Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Cedar Breaks National
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 ON THE COVER Peterson’s campion (Silene petersonii), Cedar Breaks National Monument, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 February 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientifi c literature reviews; and peer- reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinal AMA Low Water Use/Drought Tolerant Plant List
    Arizona Department of Water Resources Pinal Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Official Regulatory List for the Pinal Active Management Area Fourth Management Plan Arizona Department of Water Resources 1110 West Washington St. Ste. 310 Phoenix, AZ 85007 www.azwater.gov 602-771-8585 Pinal Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Acknowledgements The Pinal Active Management Area (AMA) Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plants List is an adoption of the Phoenix AMA Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plants List (Phoenix List). The Phoenix List was prepared in 2004 by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) in cooperation with the Landscape Technical Advisory Committee of the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association, comprised of experts from the Desert Botanical Garden, the Arizona Department of Transporation and various municipal, nursery and landscape specialists. ADWR extends its gratitude to the following members of the Plant List Advisory Committee for their generous contribution of time and expertise: Rita Jo Anthony, Wild Seed Judy Mielke, Logan Simpson Design John Augustine, Desert Tree Farm Terry Mikel, U of A Cooperative Extension Robyn Baker, City of Scottsdale Jo Miller, City of Glendale Louisa Ballard, ASU Arboritum Ron Moody, Dixileta Gardens Mike Barry, City of Chandler Ed Mulrean, Arid Zone Trees Richard Bond, City of Tempe Kent Newland, City of Phoenix Donna Difrancesco, City of Mesa Steve Priebe, City of Phornix Joe Ewan, Arizona State University Janet Rademacher, Mountain States Nursery Judy Gausman, AZ Landscape Contractors Assn. Rick Templeton, City of Phoenix Glenn Fahringer, Earth Care Cathy Rymer, Town of Gilbert Cheryl Goar, Arizona Nurssery Assn.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrubland Ecosystem Genetics and Biodiversity: Proceedings; 2000 June 13–15; Provo, Suite of Locations
    Plant Diversity at Box-Death Hollow Wilderness Area, Garfield County, Utah Wendy Rosler Janet G. Cooper Renee Van Buren Kimball T. Harper Abstract—“The Box” is a canyon located in the western portion of Under the direction of Janet Cooper, the Provo High Box-Death Hollow Wilderness Area, Garfield County, southern School Botany Club initiated this study in the fall of 1993. Utah. The objectives of this study included: (1) collect, identify and During the following 2 years (1994 and 1995) five collection make a checklist of the species of vascular plants found in “The trips were taken at different times of the year to provide a Box,” (2) search for threatened and endangered species within the reliable sample of the canyon’s flora. Each collection trip area, (3) provide an opportunity for high school students to develop emphasized a different section of the canyon, but on each research skills that contribute to the reservoir of scientific informa- trip, specimens of species previously unknown in the area tion. During a period of 2 years, students of the Provo High School were collected throughout the canyon. Plants collected were Botany Club, the club advisor, and others collected and identified either immediately identified and pressed or collected in 304 species in 63 families. Twenty plant taxa collected during this plastic bags and pressed as soon as the group arrived back study had not previously been reported for Garfield County, UT. at camp. Identification and classification followed “A Utah Species-area relationships at this area are compared to selected Flora” (Welsh and others 1993).
    [Show full text]