ittuusx Fall 1990 Vol. 10, No. 4 $4.00
Fulfilling Feminist Ideals: A New Agenda
Joan Kennedy Taylor Lois Frankel Elizabeth Johnson Victoria Branden Lois Porter Molleen Matsumura
Also: Freedom and Censorship Today Catholic Politicians Facing Excommunication? Fundamentalism and Secularization in the Middle East Why I Am Not a Presbyterian FALL 1990, VOL. 10, NO. 4 ISSN 0272-0701 Contents 3 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 39 ON THE BARRICADES 57 IN THE NAME OF GOD 4 EDITORIALS Humanism and Liberty, Paul Kurtz / Confidentiality and the Press, Vern L. Bullough / On Rational Suicide, Tim Madigan 8 INTERVIEW Freedom and Censorship Today David Friedman FULFILLING FEMINIST IDEALS: A NEW AGENDA 21 Feminism and Humanism Joan Kennedy Taylor 25 New Hope for Women Elizabeth Johnson 29 Fanny Wright: "Free Enquirer" Lois Porter 31 Feminist Spirituality as a Path to Humanism Lois Frankel 36 Spiritual Values and "The Goddess" Victoria Branden 38 Women in Humanism Molleen Matsumura ARTICLES 11 Obscenity as Destiny Frank Johnson 12 Christian Activism Intensifies as 2001 Approaches Skipp Porteous 13 What is "Political Extremism?" Laird Wilcox 17 Neutrality Between Religion and Irreligion Ronald A. Lindsay 43 Why 1 Am Not a Presbyterian Hilliard Bennett 48 The Fundamentalist Absolute and Secularization in the Middle East Mourad Wahba 41 VIEWPOINTS Catholic Politicians and the Threat of Excommunication, Tom Flynn Religion in Public Education, Robert M. Hermann 51 BOOKS Apocalypse Soon, Robert Gorham Davis I Iris Murdoch's Cognitive and Social Networks, Lyle Glazier / Atheism Defended, Timothy William Grogan I Books in Brief 58 READERS' FORUM Growing Toward Unbelief
Editor: Paul Kurtz Senior Editors: Vern Bullough, Gerald Larue Executive Editor: Tim Madigan Managing Editor: Mary Beth Gehrman Special Projects Editor: Brent Bailey Contributing Editors: Robert S. Alley, professor of humanities, University of Richmond; H. James Birx, professor of anthropology, Canisius College; Jo-Ann Boydston, director, Dewey Center; Paul Edwards, professor of philosophy, Brooklyn College; Albert Ellis, director, Institute for Rational-Emotive Therapy; Roy P. Fairfield, social scientist, Union Graduate School; Joseph Fletcher, theologian, University of Virginia Medical School; Antony Flew, philosopher, Reading University, England; Levi Fragell, executive director Human-Etisk Forbund, Norway; Adolf Grünbaum, professor of philosophy, University of Pittsburgh; R. Joseph Hoffmann, professor of humanities, California State University at Sacramento; Marvin Kohl, philosopher, State University of New York College at Fredonia; Jean Kotkin, executive director, American Ethical Union; Ronald A. Lindsay, attorney, Washington, D.C.; Delos B. McKown, professor of philosophy, Auburn University; Howard Raciest, director, Ethical Culture Schools; Robert Rimmer, author; Svetozar Stojanovic, professor of philosophy, University of Belgrade; Thomas Szasz, psychiatrist, Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse; V. M. Tarkunde, Supreme Court Judge, India; Richard Taylor, professor of philosophy, Union College; Rob Tielman, professor, University of Utrecht; Sherwin Wine, North American Committee for Humanism Associate Editors: Doris Doyle, Steven L. Mitchell, Lee Nisbet, Gordon Stein, Andrea Szalanski Editorial Associates: Robert Basil, Jim Christopher, Fred Condo Jr., Thomas Flynn, Thomas Franczyk, James Martin-Diaz, Philip Mass, Molleen Matsumura Executive Director, CODESH, Inc.: Jean Millholland Executive Director, African-Americans for Humanism: Norm Allen Jr. Chief Data Officer: Richard Seymour Typesetting: Paul E. Loynes Audio Technician: Vance Vigrass Staff: Kim Gallo, Steve Karr, Anthony Nigro, Alfreda Pidgeon, Ranjit Sandhu
FREE INQUIRY (ISSN 0272-0701) is published quarterly by the Council for Democratic and Secular Humanism (CODESH, Inc.), a nonprofit corporation, 3159 Bailey Avenue, Buffalo, NY 14215. Phone (716) 834-2921. Copyright ©1990 by CODESH, Inc. Second-class postage paid at Buffalo, New York, and at additional mailing offices. National distribution by International Periodicals Distributors, San Diego, California. Subscription rates: $22.50 for one year, $39.00 for two years, $54.00 for three years, $4.00 for current issue; $5.00 for back issues. Address subscription orders, changes of address, and advertising to: FREE INQUIRY, Box 5, Buffalo, NY 14215-0005. Manuscripts, letters, and editorial inquiries should be addressed to: The Editor, FREE INQUIRY, Box 5, Buffalo, NY 14215-0005. All manuscripts must be double-spaced and should be accompanied by a stamped, self-addressed envelope. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of the editors or publisher. Postmaster: Send address changes to FREE INQUIRY, P.O. Box 5, Buffalo, NY 14215-0005.
earth loses its source of energy—unless of course humanity finds a way to destroy all life on the earth before the sun burns out. Letters to the Editor In light of the above I see no significance of or need for dead body rituals. I feel that I've had a good life and that when I die I will really be gone. No entity, earthly or divine, knows when. Oa death and dying the very existence of evolved life on this planet. Being human is nonetheless a Larry Kelbley The "Dying Without Religion" articles in the marvelous experience, even if it is but a Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif. Summer 1990 issue provide a valuable transitory supporting role in an eternal eupraxophic context for death, but I think chemical experiment. FREE INQUIRY'S Summer issue could not one can also benefit by examining the life/ have come at a more opportune time. death cycle from a straightforward evolu- John R. Doner Two months ago, as a Unitarian minister tionary point of view. As creations of nature, Palm Beach, Fla. friend and I sat in his study, talking about we must place our existence in a natural possible ways of helping a critically ill mutual context in order to seek the ultimate purpose Last winter my father, a die-hard secular friend, word of his death came, suddenly, and cause of our mortality. humorist, took his life. In my grief and shock if not unexpectedly. The essence of life in all its forms is simply I stood by as others arranged a memorial For a moment, the blow was crushing the capability of some very complex chem- service for him in a Lutheran church. Only and numbing. Then, the awful reality set in; ical processes to attract raw materials from a last-minute angry exchange with the well- my beloved friend of ten years was irretriev- the environment and then to create more meaning pastor spared us the indignity of ably gone. He and I had been Unitarian of the chemical compounds essential to those a religion-drenched service. humanists for most of our adult lives. I processes. This provides a physical way for Recently, an acquaintance of mine who turned to my minister friend and asked, information (embodied in molecules) to self- was also a secular humanist (and humorist) "What consolation is there for a Unitarian replicate, and what life is all about is just died under circumstances very similar to my at a time like this?" I knew it was a rhetorical the transmission of such information from father's. His farewell was secular and appro- question. What consolation, indeed? each creature to its offspring. We are not priate both to him and, at last, to my father. Yet, I fully agree with the various authors immortal, but in some sense, our genetic His memorial festival provided me with a writing on death and dying the nonreligious information has the potential to be immor- much-needed opportunity to say goodbye to way. It isn't harder or easier for humanists, tal, and the true driving force of evolution my father in ways that had been denied to but in the place of meaningless ritual and is quite literally an eternal competition me by his actual funeral. an illusory promise of an afterlife, we can between "libraries" of genetic information Thank you for your summer issue. I wish find purpose and solace. to create successful but temporary somatic my father and I had had a chance to read As the days passed, I realized that I homes on their journey through the aeons. it together before his death. I know I will needed something positive to replace the self- The chemical processes of life are read and reread it as mortality creeps up destructive grief and anger that had engulfed astounding, but why is it that these processes, on me and those I love. me after my friend's death. Because he had although able to create new somata, cannot always been such a positive, upbeat person, perpetuate any given soma indefinitely? Karl W. Schmiedeskamp I knew he would not have wanted me to Quite simply, any species that obtained Billings, Mont. mourn him as I was doing. "What's the immortality in this way would quickly point? What good will it do?" he had always saturate its ecological niche, and the resulting Your many fine articles on death led me to said, with his unfailing (and sometimes shortage of resources would promote heavy focus on my beliefs. exasperating) logic, whenever I lamented intraspecies strife and physical debilitation. I am a nonreligious person. I do not something over which I had no control. Even Reproduction would effectively cease, and believe in reincarnation or an afterlife as is when his five-year battle with cancer had no further evolution of that species could often promoted. Only in a couple of nearly drained his last ounce of strength, he occur, while competing (mortal) species nonreligious ways do I believe that I will did not complain or show bitterness. "What would continue to evolve. Eventually, the live on after my death. will be, will be," he told me just weeks before immortal species would be destroyed by its For a few decades those who know me he died. The lessons he taught me about own genetic obsolescence. It follows that may think of me occasionally. Then that will living and dying will invest my life with new somatic mortality is an inescapable necessary end. I also will live on in my descendants, meaning. From his strength I now derive condition for genetic immortality. because they carry some of my genes. I mine: In personal terms, I therefore view expect that my wife, children, grandchildren, Acceptance. No more futile thoughts of "immortality" as vested in my offspring, and and those who have married into the family what "might have been.""What's the point?" my contribution to this inexorable progres- will remember me in various ways as long I can hear him say. sion called life can be no more than to invest as they live. Then all memories of me will Gratitude. He was a caring, compassion- carefully in the physical and intellectual well- have disappeared. ate person, always concerned about anyone being of my genetic relatives and my society I still will live on in my tiny share of in need—a humanist par excellence. Racon- in a manner that will contribute to the the genes that my descendants carry. So in teur, humorist, bon vivant, he was all of continuance of my descendants. I can a way I expect a miniscule part of me to these. I feel lucky for having known him. comfortably accept my eventual personal be around for a couple of billion years until "Lucky" was another word he was fond of death as the inevitable price to be paid for the sun burns up all its hydrogen and the (Letters, continued on page 60.) Fall 1990 3 in practice. A graphic illustration of this occurred on April 25, when a joint strike- force consisting of the San Francisco Police Department and the FBI descended on the home of photographer Jock Sturges. Sturges is a well-known commercial artist and photographer whose work hangs in the Museum of Modern Art and the Metropol- itan Museum in New York, and the Bib- Humanism and Liberty liotheque Nationale in Paris, and has appeared in Harpers, Vogue, and other prominent publications. Police had no Paul Kurtz search warrant, but refused to leave until it arrived several hours later. They then The democratic revolution the influence of fascism, Marxism, and anti- proceeded to confiscate thousands of advances worldwide liberal, anti-humanist "post-structuralism" photographic negatives, some of Sturges's in Europe has been discredited and a new personal property, and his business records. e continue to be gratified by the appreciation for American liberalism is Incredibly, the alleged crime involved Wdemocratic reforms sweeping Eastern appearing, a renascent neo-conservatism has twenty-seven sheets of negatives that Sturges Europe, the Soviet Union, and other areas emerged in the United States to challenge was having developed at a commercial of the world. Of special interest are the new its values. processing company. The film consisted of calls for democracy in many African informal photos of friends—adults and countries. All too many former colonies had Assaults on liberty in the children—that Sturges had taken at a established authoritarian, one-party systems, United States "clothing optional" beach in France for following the Marxist-Leninist model. personal use. Sturges was the victim of the Without personal liberty or the right of here are those in the United States who federal prosecutor's application of the Child opposition, these countries have languished Tare uncomfortable with liberal huma- Protection Act, a result of Edwin Meese's economically and politically. Now there are nism and with any kind of moral freedom. Department of Justice. The law requires that significant demands for multi-party systems They seek to impose their own narrow a person or processing lab that discovers in countries as diverse as Kenya and Gabon. standards on everyone, which means the photographs of children showing "frontal Nelson Mandela's campaign for new demo- prohibition of any form of conduct they nudity" keep records of the photos' use and cratic political order in South Africa in deem "immoral." The March 1990 issue of releases from the models. According to the which blacks can share political power with Science magazine labeled this "the New Nation, assistant U.S. prosecuting attorney, the white minority is encouraging. Belief in Puritanism." In the guise of defending Rodolfo Orjales, when shown a copy of a democracy has been an essential part of the "traditional family values," civil liberties, photo by Sturges hanging in a gallery in humanist outlook and we are pleased to see once taken for granted, are threatened by Chicago, responded that it was this ideal on the march everywhere. the devout partisans of Virtue and Piety. "prosecutable." In a recent editorial in Le Monde, We are concerned by the shift to the right This war on pornography has been France's leading newspaper, André Fontaine on the part of the Supreme Court and the extended far beyond child pornography. The pointed to a new convergence among federal courts, and the prosecutorial zeal recent arrest and prosecution of the rap European intellectuals about the need for expressed by the Justice Department and the group 2 Live Crew for their recording "As humanism. In Budapest and Paris, Prague FBI. For example, the Supreme Court ruled Nasty As They Wanna Be" is an extreme and Madrid, there is talk about human in a six-to-three decision that it is permissible display of police power. The owner of a rights, individual autonomy, tolerance, and for the police to stop drivers at roadside record store in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, pluralism—the fundamental ideals of liber- checkpoints and examine them for intoxi- was arrested for selling the record. When alism and humanism. Paradoxically, while cation. It also ruled that a videotape of a we at FREE INQUIRY heard about this we suspected drunken driver being booked at immediately set out to buy the record. I the police station can be introduced at a trial, myself found it vulgar and offensive, full of FREE INQUIRY's even if the suspect did not at first receive the most base four-letter words. Moreover, Ninth Annual Conference a Miranda warning. it is highly abusive of women, especially We do not doubt that drunken drivers black women. Nonetheless, the record is not HUMANISM are a menance, but the efforts to ban them without some redeeming artistic value. In by such draconian means are symptomatic any case, the government has no right to AND of arbitrary police power, and this is all the censor such adult materials on the chance more disconcerting when we learn that in that they may fall into the hands of the many cases police are not only stopping and young. The real intention of the intensified LIBERTY searching for driver intoxication, but for prosecutorial campaign throughout the AND THE other "criminal offenses." country came to the fore when the rap group As we have noted in previous issues, the itself was arrested after a performance before NEW THREATS Supreme Court has ruled that child porno- an adult-only audience in Hollywood, TO FREEDOM graphy is illegal. Certainly, we are repelled Florida. Thus we find not simply objections —For details, see page 46— by child pornography, but we are disturbed to child pornography, for which there is by the way efforts to prohibit it work out significant public support, but to any kind
4 FREE INQUIRY of pornography that the new censors deem had petitioned the Missouri Supreme Court Catholic—hospitals could refuse to carry out objectionable. for the removal of her feeding tubes, and a living will or proxy ordered to end life- A further erosion of personal freedom were turned down. The Supreme Court, by support; though patients would have to be was the Supreme Court's recent rulings, five a five-to-four vote, concurred with this notified about this policy upon their to four and six to three, that upheld the state denial, saying that Nancy's intentions in this admission to the hospital. laws requiring teenage girls to first notify matter were not clear—even though her The barricades are being drawn for an one or both parents before they may obtain parents brought evidence of her earlier all-out battle between right-to-die advocates an abortion. This is all part of the unrem- verbal expression of intent. and those who are adamantly opposed to itting efforts to turn back Roe v. Wade— At the time, however, the Court indicated this on religious grounds. The deeper issue a battle that will no doubt continue in state that persons who make their wishes known concerns the relationship between liberty after state. in writing before a disaster strikes have the and social order, and whether or not and We believe that the government should right to refuse medical treatment. This to what extent the state may intervene in be prohibited from legislating personal implies constitutional guarantees for prep- private choices. In my view a free society morality, and should allow freedom of aration of a living will and designation of should respect moral autonomy on problems choice in this and other matters—but surrogate power of attorney in the event of that concern intensely personal choices—of conservatives who claim to believe in the free unconsciousness. Thirty-eight states and the the individual and the family, whether it society have no compunction about applying District of Columbia now recognize the concerns euthanasia, contraception, or their own view of "traditional family values" validity of living wills, and other states are abortion. Unfortunately, a post-Reagan on everyone. As humanists we believe in in the process of enacting enabling Court under the influence of religious cultivating the wholesome qualities of family legislation. pressures appears willing to allow the state life, but surely this does not mean that The New York State Legislature recently to intervene in the private realm where it individual liberty must be suppressed. passed a "right to die" bill, which, as we deems there is a "state interest" to do so. As a footnote, I would add that the go to press, is awaiting Governor Cuomo's Supreme Court deserves praise for its ruling signature. Catholic politicians in New York Capital punishment that flag-burning is a form of symbolic free State and elsewhere have been threatened speech and that a ban would violate the First with excommunication by the hierarchy if o close on an even more dismal note, Amendment—even though the Congress and they violate commandments of the Roman Twe were appalled that the Crime President Bush tried to enact an amendment Catholic church. The Vatican's newspaper, Omnibus Bill was passed by the Senate, with prohibiting it. L'osservatore Romano, in a front-page the support of the Democratic majority. This editorial, recently denounced all such bill includes the extension of capital punish- Separation of church and state euthanasia bills. It called them "simple acts ment to thirty-four crimes. The death penalty of tragic stupidity." The newspaper claimed now applies to murder, espionage, treason, ssaults on the principle of separation that "abortion and euthanasia express the hostage-taking, kidnapping, and more. The of church and state continue. The same idea: that human life belongs exclu- United States is virtually the only demo- Supreme Court recently upheld the federal sively to Man and that everyone is the cratic country that now allows the death Equal Access act passed in 1984, which exclusive owner of his life." It goes on to penalty, not only for murder but for required public high schools to permit insist that "only God has the right to other crimes as well. Can we next expect student religious clubs to meet on school terminate life." In a last-minute concession a bill to chop off the hands of thieves? Will property on the same basis as other extra- to possible Roman Catholic opposition in the ethic of the Old Testament and the curricular organizations. We surely agree the State of New York, legislators added the Ayatollah soon become the law of the with the cherished right to freely assemble, proviso that private—that is, Roman land? • but to hold "Bible study" groups in the public schools is in our view bound to erode the equally cherished First Amendment princi- ple of separation. Militant fundamentalists Confidentiality and the Press are already marshaling their forces, and schools are being inundated with organized Bible study groups. In such a situation it Vern L. Bullough will be difficult for many impressionable children to resist the entreaties of sects that ritish newspapers were given a one-year the right to confidentiality and privacy, there seek free license to promulgate their religion .13 noticeeffective July 1, 1990, to clean is also the First Amendment guaranteeing on government property. up their act or be subjected to control by freedom of speech and of the press. What a statutory tribunal. The reason for the does one do when two basic rights conflict? The right to die notice was supposedly the "increasing public This is a difficult question when it comes outrage" over the repeated invasions of to information about human sexuality. The A mong the most encouraging recent privacy by some of the daily and Sunday proposed British legislation would allow developments from the humanist stand- tabloids. Much of the concern was not over some exceptions for invasion of privacy: point is the Supreme Court's apparent reporter aggressiveness, although this was (1) to prevent or expose crime or anti-social recognition of the right to die. Nancy part of it, but over the exposure of the sexual conduct, (2) to protect public health or Cruzan, a thirty-two-year-old Missourian, foibles and activities of the rich and safety, and (3) under an undefined "legal had been in an irreversible unconscious powerful. authority," that is, whenever it is convenient vegetative state for seven years and was being In the United States, though the Ninth for law enforcement officers. The problem kept alive artificially. Her anguished parents Amendment is usually interpreted to include is in meeting any of these definitions. Fall 1990 5 For example, San Francisco's Michelan- president did not affect his job performance press. Hoover was able to exercise such gelo Signorile, a columnist for the gay but were degrading to his listeners. In cases power because of the connivance of the press publication Outweek, has started a campaign like these there seems to be a clear reason in keeping Kennedy's private life out of the that he calls "outing," bringing to public to invade the actors' right to confidentiality. papers, something that would have been attention the homosexuality of individuals Hypocrisy itself, however, probably is not difficult if an authoritative source like who do not wish to publicly identify enough reason to expose someone, since we Hoover could be quoted. Hoover likewise themselves as such. One of his first cases all have some behaviors we do not want to had power over presidents Dwight D. was that of businessman and publisher broadcast to the world. Malcolm Forbes Eisenhower and Lyndon B. Johnson. When Malcolm Forbes, whose exuberant lifestyle might have been a hypocrite, but unlike Hoover set out to get Martin Luther King and derring-do made him a front-page Swaggart and Bakker, he did not preach and thus weaken the civil rights movement, celebrity. After Forbes's death, Signorile piety. Did exposing his bisexuality serve a he thought the key to success was exposing alleged that Forbes had been bisexual, and useful purpose? This is where it is difficult King's extracurricular sexual activity. One gave details and testimony from some of explanation for Richard M. Nixon's reluc- his alleged sexual partners. Signorile justifies To be less than honest in our tance to release many of his tapes was such actions by arguing that in the age of because of his frequent use of four-letter AIDS it is important to publicize "respec- reporting is to invite sensational- words in private conversations. He was table" homosexuals, to give young homo- izing and blackmail. This potential fearful that his carefully constructed image sexuals role-models, and to give the public power makes a strong argument of piety, which included well-publicized a better understanding of homosexuality. meetings with Billy Graham and others, It matters not that many such indi- against voluntary censorship. would be destroyed. How many political viduals are fearful of coming out in their deals have been made because the public to give easy answers. Forbes reveled in lifetime. "might not understand"? attention, and in effect manipulated the Though more and more homosexuals are It is this threat of exposure that raises identifying themselves as such, many are not. media. Generally the media went along with fear and trembling in the hearts of many. When Signorile released a very long list of this, but they also have a right to refuse to What is true for men is even more so for prominent individuals whom he said were be manipulated, exposing more of Forbe's women, since the public seems less forgiving gay or lesbian, very few newspapers picked private life than he may have wanted simply of their sexual irregularities. I must admit up the story, perhaps wanting to shield these bedcause he had made himself such a I was pleased when the pious hypocrisies of people from the stigma that obviously exists celebrity. Swaggart and Bakker were revealed, and felt in some circles against homosexuals. The The problem goes deeper and becomes much more upset when the president of nightclub pianist and television star Liberace more complicated the more one investigates American University was exposed. Still, it continually denied during his lifetime the the topic. When I was in my teens I served should not be my personal prejudices that rumors that he was homosexual; after he an apprenticeship as a police reporter for determine whether or not a person's privacy contracted AIDS he even denied he had the a major daily metropolitan newspaper. I should be invaded. We are all human and disease. Yet after he died, information about must admit I was shocked by many of the each of us has failings. By refusing to deal his lifestyle was everywhere; even the activities of well-known people that went with the reality of the total person, the media television movies of his life reported on his unreported. Most such activities were not do us all a disservice. By sensationalizing sex partners. reported because the paper I worked for private matters for whatever reason, they It is not just homosexuality that carries prided itself on being a family newspaper; tend to paint celebrities as unique for reasons a negative connotation. Gary Hart, a often there was not enough evidence to other than their celebrity, though often their Democratic candidate for president in 1988, prosecute; sometimes the person in question activities are common among the general fell rapidly in the public opinion polls after had powerful friends in the newspaper heir- population. It gives the media power to make the press played up his extramarital sexual archy. The result of such censorship, how- or break an individual, and it gives the activities. Recently the president of Amer- ever, is not necessarily benign. If a newspaper unscrupulous means to justify their ends. ican University was vilified for making wants to discredit someone, the files are What will resolve the problem? One obscene telephone calls. Jimmy Swaggart's always on hand. When damaging informa- answer is for the press to try to avoid giving observational sex with a prostitute and Jim tion is finally published it has greater shock false portrayals of key individuals, rather Bakker's liaison with a paid companion both value, since the individuals involved have than balancing their good and bad points. tarnished the image of the evangelical long been regarded as different from others Obviously there is a need to avoid libel, Christian movement. The list of "exposures" whose activities have not been publicized. particularly malicious libel, and blackmail. could go on to include British cabinet For example, when I told my parents about If more noncelebrities admitted that they ministers, a premier of Japan, and many less the police blotter activities of some of their were gay, or nudists, or alcoholics, or former prominent people. friends, they either simply refused to believe drug abusers, it would desensationalize such Several questions come to mind. Two are it or said there must have been some mistake. topics. Legitimate news events should not easy to answer. Did the alleged sexual It is this potential power of blackmail by be sensationalized, but neither should they conduct impair the person's job perfor- the press and others that makes a strong be ignored. Newspapers should dig deeper mance? Did it hurt someone else? In most argument against voluntary censorship. and be more cautious about accepting cases the act itself probably did not impair John F. Kennedy kept J. Edgar Hoover created images such as Malcolm Forbes the person's job performance; Bakker and on as chief of the FBI long after Hoover's created for himself. I think Forbes's bisexual Swaggart are possible exceptions to this management style had outlived its useful- activities, if they are documented, are because of the obvious contradiction ness; many contend this was because Hoover important to our understanding of American between their private and public lives. The had a long file on Kennedy's sexual pecca- male machismo, just as John F. Kennedy's obscene phone calls of the university dilloes, which he threatened to leak to the alleged ability with women gives us an 6 FREE INQUIRY understanding of the uses and abuses of ultimate weapon: he threatened to expose a bit too sanguine in his conclusion that power. To be less than honest in our the sexual activities of many of his fellow no one has ever thrown away life for reporting is to invite sensationalizing and congressmen who were "out to get" him. frivolous reasons. There are numerous cases blackmail. Such a threat could exist only when self- of jilted lovers and other exponents of the Barney Frank did the responsible thing censorship of the press about sex remains "goodbye, cruel world" method who belie in stating that he was homosexual when the the norm rather than the exception. this view. And today, the alarming number issue was raised; but as the intensity of the Obviously the press should avoid not only of teenage suicides sadly demonstrates how Congressional investigation into his lifestyle slander and libel but sensationalism as well. irrational an act suicide often is. Indeed, an increased after his activities with a male The objective should be responsible report- organization called the American Suicide prostitute were revealed, he turned to his ing on sexual matters. • Foundation, based in New York City, was founded in 1987 to research the causes of suicide, and seek adequate preventive programs. On Rational Suicide In order for an action to be deemed rational, it must involve effective delibera- tion and a realistic assessment of possibil- Tim Madigan ities. This is especially true for the action of self-annihilation: life is precious, and he recent controversy over Dr. Jack begins his book entitled Suicide with the should not be given up lightly. But there TKevorkian's so-called "suicide statement: "As the humanists freed men to are demonstrable cases of rational suicides, machine," coupled with the Supreme Court live, they brought them the right to die." such as the recent example of the noted decision in the Nancy Cruzan case, has It was the humanists, strong defenders of Freudian scholar Bruno Bettelheim, who brought to the forefront the debate over human freedom and autonomy, who ques- took his own life after determining that its whether or not there is a right to die. It is tioned the religious sanctions against self- quality had so seriously deteriorated that he estimated that 80 percent of Americans now murder; for suicide is the ultimate autonom- no longer wished to go on living. In this, die either in hospitals or in long-term care ous action. he was emulating Freud himself, who in his facilities, and many of us rightly fear that David Hume sought to answer the final hours told his doctor, Max Schur: "My we will spend our final days in a vegetative traditional objections in his essay "Of dear Schur, you remember our `contract' not state, hooked up to a life-support system. Suicide," written in 1755 (but, significantly, to leave me in the lurch when the time has In the words of Justice William Brennan, not published until after his death in 1776). come. Now it is nothing but torture and "The timing of death—once a matter of "If suicide be criminal," he wrote, "it must makes no sense." Schur, a longtime friend fate—is now a matter of human choice." be a transgression of our duty either to God, of Freud's, thereupon gave him a large dose FREE INQUIRY came out in favor of volun- our neighbor, or ourselves." On the first of morphine, which brought about a coma tary active euthanasia in its Winter 1988 point, he countered that if God had granted from which Freud did not awake. issue, and it has long supported the right us reasoning powers, and if through using Jack Kevorkian, like Max Schur, was to death with dignity. those powers a person concludes that death motivated by compassion when he helped The notion that one can freely choose is preferable to life, then that person is not Janet Adkins in her wish to die. But one to terminate one's own existence is abhorrent transgressing God's laws by following the can argue that, unlike Schur, he had no real to many religious-minded individuals, who dictates of reason. Hume went on to say understanding of his patient's wishes (indeed, believe that only God should determine when that there is no explicit scriptural admoni- he had only met her a very short time before life will end. Though many pre-Christian tion against suicide. "Thou shalt not kill is the suicide took place), and was not able belief systems, such as Stoicism and evidently meant to exclude only the killing to judge if her action was rational or Buddhism, have extolled the value of suicide, of others, over which one has no authority. irrational. Still, he did seek to do what she Christianity has firmly opposed it. Saint That this precept, like most of the scripture deemed best, and was quoted as saying "My Augustine spelled out the chief objections precepts, must be modified by reason and motto is 'a rational policy of planned to it: The Sixth Commandment says "Thou common sense, is plain from the practice death.' " If nothing else, his homemade shalt not kill," and that includes killing of magistrates, who punish criminals suicide machine touched a national nerve, oneself; it is our duty to bear our sufferings, capitally, notwithstanding the letter of this and has opened up the discussion on what just like Christ did; if one is innocent of law." is literally a life-and-death issue. wrongdoing, then it is wrong to kill the As for the second objection, killing Humanists are not in the business of innocent, and if one is guilty of wrongdoing, oneself does not transgress one's duty to promoting thanatoriums. But they are it is wrong to take justice into one's own one's neighbor if one is no longer able to devoted to personal autonomy, including the hands; finally, suicide offers no hope of promote the good of society. And finally, right to determine one's own death. Let us repentance—didn't Judas commit suicide suicide need not be a transgression of one's remember that while humanists advocate the after betraying Christ? We don't want to duty to oneself if age, sickness, or misfortune right to die, they do so only with the emulate him, do we? renders one's life a burden. Hume ends his condition that much reflection and under- Added to this list are a host of other essay with the statement "I believe that no standing of the situation (including the traditional objections: suicide is a crime man ever threw away life while it was worth consequences such an action will have upon against society; it is a violation of our duty keeping. For such is the natural horror of family and friends) has first taken place. As to God; it is an insult to human dignity; death, that small motives will never be able Friedrich Nietzsche once perceptively it is an unnatural act. Still, over the centuries to reconcile us to it." pointed out: "The thought of suicide is a there have been defenders of the right to Hume's essay is a powerful defense of strong consolation—one can get through suicide under certain conditions. S. E. Sprott the rationality of suicide. But he was perhaps many a bad night with it." • Fall 1990 7 Freedom and Censorship Today A FREE INQUIRY interview with David Friedman
FREE INQUIRY: We've noticed recently a greater intensification South Dakota, they could get a conviction. That's why of efforts by the government to censor or suppress what it Sturman was convicted in his hometown of Cleveland; because considers to be pornography. the government still has the opportunity to forum shop, so DAVID FRIEDMAN: There is no question that right now to speak. there is a tremendous thrust on the part of a combined task- FI: "Forum shop"? force of government agencies, both the FBI and the IRS, FRIEDMAN: They decide where they want to have the to go after certain kinds of pornographic industries in this trial—usually in what they consider a conservative community, country. They have tried all manner of entrapment, and have figuring they'll get a jury conviction. made many arrests. Today the government seems to have FI: So they can prosecute in any community in the country? targeted the half-dozen biggest firms and/ or individuals FRIEDMAN: Any community in the country. engaged in the manufacture, distribution, dissemination, even FI: Is this why Cincinnati's going after Larry Flint and retail sale of videotapes, magazines, newspapers—any type Mapplethorpe? of sex-oriented material. They've gone after these people with FRIEDMAN: Well, of course, Mapplethorpe is a local a two-pronged attack: they'll file forty or fifty counts of issue in Cincinnati. But if you're engaged in the interstate obscenity as well as a number of income-tax violations. This transport of adult materials, then theoretically you can be happened, for instance, to a man named Rubin Sturman in tried in any place between point A and point B. Cleveland, who had a vast empire of adult-oriented enterprises. FI: The director of the Cincinnati Art Museum claims that They've managed to convict him of all sorts of things. He this is part of a coordinated national effort, that the is currently out on a cash bail of more than one million dollars. conservative forces figured they could win in Cincinnati and FI: What did he distribute? then use the case as a precedent. FRIEDMAN: Videotapes, magazines, and books. He also FRIEDMAN: Of course, that debate centered on the fine owned countless peepshow parlors from coast to coast, adult arts, which is somewhat different from the distribution of bookstores, adult video stores... . adult-oriented material or, if you will, the porno industry. FI: And these had not been declared obscene by any of Right after Sturman, a man named Mohney was arrested the courts? in Michigan, where his base is located. There were twenty FRIEDMAN: Oh, no. There is a federal law on the books, or thirty so-called indictments on obscenity and another twenty though it's very hard to enforce, calling for the prohibition or thirty on income-tax violation. Mohney and Sturman were of interstate transportation of alleged obscene material. But the two biggest names in the business. They owned bookstores, interestingly in 1973 in Miller v. California, the Supreme Court video stores, distribution firms. said that each community could set its own standards with FI: Did they find Mohney in violation on the income- regard to "pornography." So now the government is in a crazy tax charges? position. If they had a trial in New York they would never FRIEDMAN: They found him in violation on both counts. get a conviction; if they had the same trial in Sioux Falls, A very close friend of mine was also indicted: Ferris Alexander, who operates solely in Minnesota. He is in distribution and retailing, and here again, the same pattern. It almost seems to go back to the day Herbert Hoover saw David Friedman's autobio- Al Capone in the lobby of the Stevens Hotel in Chicago, graphy, A Youth in Babylon: and said to J. Edgar Hoover, "Get him!" The ends justified Confessions of a Trash-Film the means. The double-pronged attacks of today are King, will be published this characteristic of this. The RICO bill—Racketeering Influenced fall by Prometheus Books. Corrupt Organizations—covers a multitude of sins. Friedman produced a great FI: And federal judges seem to be mainly conservative number of "sexploitation" appointees. films, many of them now FRIEDMAN: Well, most of these were jury cases. But considered classics. let's say the jury doesn't really give a damn about dirty books, dirty videos. Tell that same jury that someone hasn't paid
8 FREE INQUIRY income tax—that'll get to the average juror quicker than one or two adult theaters. It turned out that, like most of anything else. They generally cannot prove anything under these guys, he had a skeleton in his closet. He was taking strictly an obscenity charge. They were losing too many cases. money from the local gambling syndicate, and wound up FI: Have these individuals been convicted? committing suicide before he went to trial. FRIEDMAN: They've all been convicted, on twenty to FI: What has Thornburgh done since he's become attorney forty counts each. As I said, Sturman is out on bail. Mohney general? is on appeal, but he had to put up something like seven hundred FRIEDMAN: A strange thing has happened. The way I thousand dollars bail. I haven't talked to Alexander since read it, it hasn't been announced that We're-going-to-go-out- that decision was handed down. there-and-close-these-guys-down-we're-on-this-great-moral- FI: Do you think this is part of an effort to kill freedom crusade-Onward-Christian-Soldiers and so forth. It has been of speech and the First Amendment? done very quietly. They have picked their targets—three of FRIEDMAN: Absolutely. It is definitely an effort to the biggest people in the adult-oriented business. They have squelch the distribution, exhibition, and retailing of adult- come down with indictments that no one could defend from oriented material, and I don't care what the material is. It's the sheer number of them. They've done their homework. certainly an effort to sublimate freedom of speech. FI: So what has happened in terms of distribution? We've been through this before. I've been fighting these FRIEDMAN: To some degree it has chilled. Each of these cases since the 1950s. With the adult film industry the courts men has now put his business up for sale, but of course, first had to recognize that motion pictures are part of the there's no one in their league in the industry who can buy press and, of course, are protected under the First Amendment. them. FI: And that was finally achieved in the 1950s. Did you FI: They control nationwide distribution? have a role in that achievement? FRIEDMAN: Oh yes. They are the General Motors, FRIEDMAN: Yes, of course, with films like Because of Chrysler, and Ford of the adult industry. Eve, which depicted the birth of a baby. We went to court FI: We're not talking about child pornography are we? and proved that this was not obscene and was protected speech. FRIEDMAN: Oh no, no, no, no, no. When it comes to Four hundred different cases were in court over pictures like child pornography, I won't defend or sanction it in any form. this, in 1954, '55, '56, until around 1960. By then a new genre FI: So this is clearly adult material. But there has been of film was suddenly very popular, the nudist-colony film. a great campaign against child pornography. We proved in court that nudity, per se, was not obscenity. FRIEDMAN: Child pornography is not a viable commer- FI: So we've come a long way from that? cial enterprise. It is a cottage industry that is made and FRIEDMAN: We've come tremendously far. distributed among the pedarasts themselves. I've said this for FI: And now you think the pendulum is swinging back? years, since I was president of the Adult Film Association. FRIEDMAN: I think it's swinging. It started basically with Finally the government itself has agreed, and the Department Ed Meese. He started out as a prosecutor in Alameda County, of General Services has published a booklet to that effect, California, who made his name by prosecuting adult called "The Study of Child Pornography in the United States." bookstores and adult theaters. I happened to own one in Basically it is done by the child molesters themselves who Oakland, so I knew him very well. Then when Reagan made have this little clique. him attorney general, the first thing he did was form another FI: They've made a great campaign. They say that anything Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. The commission is child pornography. that President Johnson had appointed, of course, contained FRIEDMAN: Ah! "Child pornography!" They also have some very learned people. It was a very distinguished panel. said it is controlled by the Mafia. They have made every But the Meese Commission was an entirely different story. allegation in the world. It was headed by a prosecutor from Virginia County who It is ridiculous to try to pin this on the Mafia. First of said, "I'm goin' to run these duhty bookstohs out o' my all, there are hundreds of people in this business. It is not county," and a couple of other nut cases. one gigantic cartel. It's a relatively easy business to be in FI: And under Meese they began to intensify efforts. if you have the guts to do it. Anyone can be in the X-rated FRIEDMAN: Strangely enough, the intellectual commun- business. Real organized crime is into loan sharking, big-time ity in this country totally rejected Meese, and we in the business gambling, narcotics. X-rated material would be a drop in the said, "Well, that's the end of that." All Meese did was make bucket for them. Why be in something like this where the a bigger fool of himself than we thought possible. But he returns are so small by comparison? And you're always in attempted to suppress adult-oriented material and succeeded the spotlight. for a time in making some noise, at any rate. FI: How many porno theaters are left in the United States? FI: What about Thornburgh under Bush? FRIEDMAN: Most of them today, in fact all of them FRIEDMAN: Richard Thornburgh was the governor of that are left, are playing videotape. I don't think there are Pennsylvania. We had never had any problems in the State more than twenty in the whole United States. of Pennsylvania, so we weren't too worried. FI: And how many were there at its peak? FI: No censorship? FRIEDMAN: About seven hundred; that was about seven FRIEDMAN: No censorship. There was one character, years ago. a district attorney in Pittsburgh, who was going to close down FI: But they're not declining because of the crackdown?
Fall 1990 9 FRIEDMAN: They're declining because today it's too easy FRIEDMAN: The government has never worried about to make a videotape. The customer can film it in the privacy violence in films because American films are based on violence. of his or her home. When the Japanese invented the video- That's been the specialty of motion pictures almost from the tape, it revolutionized motion picture exhibition throughout beginning—the gangster film, the western. But God forbid the world. It hurt general-release films, but it was made to you have someone holding a breast or patting a behind. They order for the X-rated business, because for the first time films don't want to see people making beautiful love together, but could be taken home. Customers didn't have to worry about they don't mind you tearing someone's head off. being seen going into an adult theater. FI: We mentioned Charles Keating before. FI: So videos are big business now? FRIEDMAN: Ah yes! Keating came into power ten or FRIEDMAN: I think it's reached its peak. Despite what fifteeen years ago, as the associate of a very wealthy and we hear from the powers that be, we're not developing into mysterious man in Cincinnati named Carl Lindner, who a nation of perverts. financed Keating with a company called American Financial, FI: In some areas sale of X-rated videotapes has been which owns the Provident Bank in Cincinnati and the prohibited. How widespread is this? Cincinnati Inquirer. FRIEDMAN: There are towns that ban it. But in those Later Keating surfaced in Phoenix and started a company areas the few people who want them can order by mail. called Lincoln Savings and Loan, around the time restrictions FI: Are there any attempts to prevent mail-order sales? were being lifted. FRIEDMAN: When videotapes came along, suddenly the He became famous nationally when he was on the Johnson government became very interested again. Now this thing can Commission in 1968, which was started by Johnson and go worldwide without any restrictions whatsoever. And all inherited by Nixon, who rejected it because all but three of a sudden it became a great concern of the government. members of the commission concluded that pornography was The problem with this, of course, is that it is something that not dangerous. The three dissenters were a priest, a reverend, can be made and seen in the privacy of someone's home. and Keating. The other fifteen members said there were no One of the basic tenets of our Constitution is the right of harmful effects. This didn't satisfy Keating, who started a privacy; the easier it is for people to see these things in their nationwide group called Citizens for Decency through Law own homes, the harder it will be for the government to get (CDL). He proceeded to extract great contributions from a jury thatil convict. people all over the country. Three states, including FI: Does the same thing happen with books and magazines? Pennsylvania, actually stopped him from soliciting within their FRIEDMAN: I think to a large degree the printed word, borders because there is a law that you cannot take a deduction books particularly, are no longer of concern to government. if the association to which you are contributing engages in The picture books, however, are getting as much heat as the political activity. Keating said, "Oh, it was just a bookkeeping videotapes are getting. error. We're straightening out our lot." Very, very sharp man. FI: To what extent is censorship effective? But he continued. FRIEDMAN: The funny thing is, we're no longer seeing It was one of Keating's people, Raymond Gauer, who these big announced raids that they used to conduct. They're invented the snuff film theory. He was addressing a Holy being more assiduous, with direct, concerted attacks on people Name Society in San Diego one day, and he said something they consider to be the kingpins of the business in an effort like, "The people who make these movies are no longer satisfied to wipe it out. to simulate sex, but actually have the actors perform sexual FI: You said earlier that the only way to minimize acts." This is true. But he continued, "Therefore it must follow pornography is to allow it to be free, and that once it is that they will no longer be satisfied to simulate murder, but suppressed it will flourish again. will actually begin murdering people." This was pure FRIEDMAN: Of course. Because you're basically dealing conjecture. But what a reaction he got! So the next week with forbidden fruit. And if the fruit is no longer forbidden, he goes back and says, "I understand that now that they're no one cares. It has happened in Denmark, in the Netherlands, making films where they are actually murdering people. Send in Germany; after a while the interest faded. There really isn't me money! Send me money!" Okay. This builds, and soon much originality to pornography; it must perish after a while he's saying, "And it's called the `snuff film,' and the FBI has because there is nothing that new about it. Only a very few evidence that these things exist." The FBI office in Los Angeles addicts will continue to buy it. is flooded with calls. They had no evidence whatsoever. Finally, FI: So you are concerned that the intensified efforts at the Adult Film Association offered a reward of twenty-five censorship will be counterproductive? thousand dollars to anyone who could uncover a 'snuff' film. FRIEDMAN: I'm concerned not only about the suppres- Well that finally died out. Gauer vanished into the woodwork, sion of adult-oriented material; I think there's a direct but they collected a lot of money. As I said, Keating turned correlation with the abortion issue and other issues of privacy up in Phoenix as head of Lincoln Savings and Loan, which and the right of free choice. It is an overall thrust and I took the life savings of a lot of people. He came out, though, do not understand why government thinks this is so important, looking like Mr. Clean, because of this smoke screen he'd or where they think their votes are going to come from. set up: "I will rid our blessed nation of these dirty sex kings." FI: Why do you think the government is more worried In the meantime, he is really doing some damage. And that's about sex than violence in films? what goes in the United States today. •
10 FREE INQUIRY Keating's Subcommittee testimony con- tinues:
Obscenity as Destiny We [the CDL] get a lot of mail indicating people who have picked these nudist magazines up and find them filled with semen when boys masturbate on the pictures, and so forth. Nothing else could be expected. In these days, speaking of masturbation, when you run into that Frank Johnson problem, I just mention it casually and take for granted that most people think Detractors might suggest that Keating Charlharleses H. Keating Jr., the Arizona that it is a very bad thing and very behind the Lincoln Savings was not a polished thinker at this point and, dangerous. and Loan scandal, has known anxious times indeed, by the time the CDL went nation- before. wide in 1962, it had developed a corps of Around this time, Keating was beginning Born in 1923 of a prominent Cincinnati slick anti-porno promo men. to have financial intrigues of a very personal family, he attended the University of The organization headquartered for a nature. He had become involved with Carl Cincinnati, graduating with a law degree in while in Los Angeles, and became famous H. Lindner, a multimillionaire takeover 1948. Extremely tall and lean, he became for its eloquent right-wing angst. artist in Cincinnati. Keating was made an Olympic swimmer, and appeared destined Raymond P. Gauer, Executive Director executive vice-president of Lindner's Amer- for the safest of midwestern pursuits. of the CDL at that time, appeared on the ican Financial Corporation; Lindner became Somewhere along the line, he developed Manion Forum, a John Birch Society radio a member of the Board of Governors of the an interest—there are those who would call program out of Indiana. CDL speakers Citizens for Decency through Law; eventu- it a messianic infatuation—regarding the quickly became the darlings of Birchite get- ally, Keating's son, Charles H. III, became role of pornography in modern society. He togethers, notably the New England Rally executive vice-president of American Finan- formed a law firm—Keating, Muething and for God, Family and Country; they gave cial, while Lindner's son, Robert D., rose Klekamp—but his passion was with the rousing speeches in 1964, 1968, and 1969. to the Board of Governors of the CDL. prosecution, and his target was specialized. The National Spokesman for the CDL, It may be assumed that here, in the He put his money, and his golden-boy Robert K. Doman, was elected a congres- smokeless boardrooms of the wealthy and energy, into the obscenity question. sional representative in California. Things extremely decent, the art of junk bonds and In the mid-1950s, Keating became were looking sweet for the CDL, and there junk morality was transferred, or at least involved with the structuring of a number were mass mailings. had its seed. of censorship organizations, some glaringly Keating went deep into money and The Securities and Exchange Commis- Catholic, such as the Legion of Decency and obscenity in the late 1970s, and some would sion closed in, with charges of using the Parish Decency Committee, and some suggest he never quite surfaced. The CDL company funds for personal benefit, includ- that purported to be nonsectarian, like the was barging forward, fighting risque tele- ing loans to Keating's family and friends. National Organization for Decent Litera- vision, magazines, and books and taking in Keating fought back. With regard to ture. In 1957, with the eventual financial large amounts of money, often from elderly American Financial, he agreed to a consent backing of Reader's Digest magazine, people rightfully disturbed by the sexual order not to further violate securities laws. Keating launched the Citizens for Decent schizophrenia surrounding them. But pieces He did not admit or deny guilt. He hired Literature, which soon changed its name to were beginning to splinter. The Citizens a new fundraiser for the CDL, and this Citizens for Decency through Law (CDL). for Decency through Law, and Charles cooled matters for him in the hanging states. He was no longer an outlaw. By the early 1960s, Keating was offering Keating himself, ran into difficulty with the He was once again given the public quirky testimony to the House Subcommit- real law. platform in 1970 when he was appointed to tee on Postal Operations: In Pennsylvania, the Director of the Commission on Charitable Solicitations said the Nixon Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, which took as a whole a [Pornography] causes premarital inter- the CDL exceeded the limit (35 percent) that course, perversion, masturbation in boys, a so-called charitable group could legally tolerant attitude toward free speech. Keating wantonness in girls.... Attention is given spend on fund-raising (the CDL tipped the offered a dissenting view: "I submit that if to sensationalists such as Kinsey and scale at 90 percent). North Carolina refused pornography does not affect a person, that Eberhard ... who, finding fellow travelers person has a problem." in erstwhile respectable media, manage to to grant the CDL permission to carry on disseminate, directly and indirectly, their its mail solicitation campaign because 86.1 absurd and dirty bleatings and pagan percent of the funds the organization lderly people have recently been testi- ideas. It seems strange to me that we reported receiving in one year went into Efying before a different commission. credit—I should say that our mass media administrative and solicitation costs; the Their futures are suddenly uncertain, credit—the unestablished generalities of a New York State Attorney General charged because of Mr. Keating. Their hands tremble few so-called experts, but ignore the now and then. Their speech falters. Yet they overwhelming testimony of the true the CDL with committing nearly $1.5 million experts like J. Edgar Hoover. in expected receipts to a professional fund- are the clearest of poets, because they know raising concern. The State of Florida took the truth like a knife in the back. action to deny the group an application to Charles H. Keating Jr. seems to have successfully accomplished what he set out Frank Johnson is a writer living in Tenants raise funds after it submitted an application to do in the 1950s. He has single-handedly Harbor, Maine. that, according to a state enforcement • official, contained misleading information. redefined the meaning of obscenity.
Fall 1990 11 Christian Activism Intensifies as 2001 Approaches
Skipp Porteous
he year is 2001. Half the population has favorite national minister in a World Home American Christians, they are in the fourth Tbeen converted to faith in Jesus Christ, Bible League survey. His thirty-minute radio year of a ten-year plan to establish the and the Christian church rules the world. broadcast is aired three thousand times a "Biblical World View of Law, Government, Though this seems implausible, more week! Economics, Business, Education, Arts and than two hundred Christian missionary "Focus on the Family" is quietly but Communication, Medicine, Psychology and organizations are scheming to bring it effectively organizing state political blocs to Counseling, Science and Technology, Chris- about—as a birthday present for Jesus. The coalesce dozens of Christian special-interest tian Unity, and Social and Political Moral battle lines are being drawn for the conflict groups. The coalitions include anti-abortion Issues." of the century. groups; pro-censorship organizations; Members of the coalition made "a Militancy has become a prevalent theme prayer in school, school missionary, and covenant with God and with each other to in Christian conferences. A "Take It by "creation science" advocates; anti-gay rights live in obedience to the Bible until they die." Force" conference was held recently in activists; political activists; and born-again They aim to make the world conform to Phoenix by the "Forceful Men" organiza- candidates. biblical standards, "rather than continuing tion. The crowd of 16,500 was admonished To date, "Focus on the Family" has to allow the world to conform the church to "invade, conquer, and possess the land" organized in twenty states. Dobson intends to its standards." through Christian activism. to establish "well-functioning, highly mot- Other radical and powerful Christian In Tulsa, believers were told to "be bold, ivated activist groups across the land." He activist groups have pulled out all the stops full of authority—militant," at the "Militant has said, "Once coalitions are in place, our as they steam ahead. Campus Crusade for Church Conference." And, in Orlando, the state legislators will discover they can no Christ will conduct massive evangelistic "Mighty Warriors Conference" was pres- longer write off the concerns of conservative training seminars in which Christians ented at the Orlando Christian Center, near Christian families." worldwide will be linked together through Walt Disney World. "Focus on the Family" provided Jack satellites and earth stations. Almost a hundred cities across America Thompson, a born-again Miami attorney, The National Association of Christian now have Christian television stations. with the materials he's used in his campaign Educators has targeted 15,700 school boards Christian radio stations have increased to against Luther Campbell of the rap group for take-over. Already, they boast of several 1,485. According to the National Religious 2 Live Crew. Campbell is the first recording victories. Broadcasters, religious broadcasting is still artist in history to have his music ruled The Assemblies of God, a Pentecostal a $2 billion a year industry. obscene by a federal court. He and some denomination with thirteen million adher- Evangelical and fundamentalist churches members of his group were arrested in Miami ents, intends to "plant" five thousand new continue to grow at a rapid pace, while after a live performance of the group's Pentecostal churches in the United States liberal churches decline. Money continues album. by the year 2000. Additionally, the Reverend to pour into fundamentalist organizations. Televangelist Pat Robertson's new organ- Jerry Falwell is sending graduates of his Born-again Christian activism has not ization, the Christian Coalition, replaces the Liberty University—with an enrollment of realized its political potential because of the defunct Moral Majority and Freedom almost nine thousand—to establish five divisiveness among its factions. Determined Council. The Christian Coalition, too, is thousand new Falwellian churches. efforts are underway to bring the various setting up organizations in every state. According to Gallup, there are sixty groups and leaders together; significant steps Ralph Reed, the coalition's executive million born-again Christians in the United in this direction have already been set in director, said: States, who believe that we are in the "last motion. days" and that history as we know it will "Focus on the Family," a ministry The Christian community got it backwards end in our lifetime. founded by the Christian psychologist James in the 1980s. We tried to charge Washing- So-called Bible prophecy plays a major ton when we should have been focusing part in neo-Christian activism. Christian Dobson, has revenues of $60 million a year, on the states. The real battles of concern and employs seven hundred at its California to Christians are in neighborhoods, school leaders claim that America is the last hope headquarters. Dobson was listed as the boards, city councils, and state for the world; God will use America as a legislatures. missionary base to reach the world. They Skipp Porteous is the editor and publisher also proclaim that Jesus wants to come back of the Freedom Writer, a national newsletter Another group, the Coalition on Revival to a church that is strong, pure, militant— that defends the separation of church and (COR) has labored with little or no publicity. and in control. state, and of Walk Away, a support news- Its members, 112 national Christian leaders, The only hope for secularists is to letter for ex fundamentalists. are a virtual Who's Who of the religious vigorously defend the separation of church right. As the representatives of millions of and state against this onslaught. •
12 FREE INQUIRY What Is "Political Extremism's
Laird Wilcox
If it's a despot you would dethrone, see first that his throne of dogmatic thinking, prejudgment, and authoritarianism, has erected within you is destroyed. this to say about it: —Kahlil Gibran, 1923 To study the organization of belief systems, we find it necessary oger Scruton, in the Dictionary of Political Thought to concern ourselves with the structure rather than content defines "extremism" as: of beliefs. The relative openness or closedness of a mind cuts across specific content; that is, it is not uniquely restricted R to any particular ideology, or religion, or philosophy, or scientific viewpoint. A person may adhere to communism, 1. Taking a political idea to its limits, regardless of existentialism, Freudianism, or the "new conservatism" in a unfortunate repercussions, impracticalities, arguments, and relatively open or relatively closed manner. Thus, a basic feelings to the contrary, and with the intention not only requirement is that the concepts to be employed in the to confront, but to eliminate opposition. description of belief systems must not be tied to a particular 2. Intolerance toward all views other than one's own. belief system; they must be constructed to apply equally to 3. Adoption of means to political ends which show disregard all belief systems. for the life, liberty, and human rights of others. Rokeach goes on to say "authoritarianism and intolerance This definition basically reflects my own experience, that in belief and interpersonal relations are surely not a monopoly extremism is more an issue of style than of content. In the of Fascists, Anti-Semites, Ku Klux Klanners, or conserva- twenty-five years that I have been investigating political groups tives." I agree, and would add that the same behaviors merely of the left and right, I have found that most people can hold take different forms and utilize different vocabulary on the radical or unorthodox views and still entertain them in a more "left" side of the political spectrum. The essential characteristics or less reasonable, rational, and nondogmatic manner. On remain quite similar. The choice of adjectives used to describe the other hand, I have met people whose views were fairly the behavior in question often derives far more from the biases close to the political mainstream but were presented in a shrill, and interests of the observer than from the objective facts uncompromising, bullying, and distinctly authoritarian of the situation. Daniel Bell, the eminent sociologist and author manner. The latter demonstrated a starkly extremist mentality of The Radical Right, tends to support this view. He says, while the former demonstrated only ideological unorthodoxy, "The way you hold beliefs is more important than what you which is hardly to be feared in a relatively free society such hold. If somebody's been a rigid Communist, he becomes as ours. a rigid anti-Communist—the rigidity being constant." This view of extremism, which may seem novel to many In my opinion, most strident opponents of right-wing or people since in today's climate the term is usually used as left-wing "extremism" exhibit significant ideological bias, and an epithet, is held by many writers and authorities, especially many are actually representatives of the opposing extreme. those who approach the issue from a relatively even-handed The fact that an extremist hates and agitates against other and nonideological point of view. Milton Rokeach, whose extremists doesn't mitigate his or her own character in this book The Open and Closed Mind is a classic in the field regard. In fact, opposing extremists often form a vague bond or symbolic relationship with one another, each justifying the others' existence. Laird Wilcox is founder of In focusing on the style rather than the content of a belief the Wilcox Collection on system, I don't mean to imply that content is entirely irrelevant. Contemporary Political People who tend to adopt the extremist style most often Movements in the Spencer champion causes and adopt ideologies that are essentially Library at the University of "fringe" positions. But mere advocacy of "fringe" positions Kansas. He publishes a series gives our society the variety and vitality it needs to function of research guides on the as an open democracy, to discuss and debate all aspects of American Left, the Ameri- an issue, and to deal with problems that otherwise have been can Right, and the American ignored. The extremist style is another issue altogether, Occult. however, in that it hampers our understanding of important issues, it muddies the waters of discourse with invective,
Fall 1990 13 defamation, self-righteousness, fanaticism, and hatred, and it expressed in these terms, including a polemical style that is impairs our ability to make intelligent, well-informed choices. fairly easy to identify. Another point is that the extremist style is not only found 1. Character assassination. Extremists often attack the at the fringes of the political or religious spectrum, but character of an opponent rather than deal with the facts or sometimes in the "middle" as well. An individual who is issues raised. They will question motives, qualifications, past uncompromisingly and intolerantly "centrist" may be far more associations, alleged values, personality, looks, mental health, dogmatic and prejudiced than someone who adopts more and so on as a diversion from the issues under consideration. radical views but does so in a open and tolerant manner. Some of these matters are not entirely irrelevant, but they Consequently, a guarded middle-of-the-road position doesn't should not serve to avoid the real issues. Extremists object necessarily provide a solution to extremism, and in some cases strenuously when this is done to them, of course! can only serve as a mask to conceal it. In fact, it could be 2. Name calling and labeling. Extremists are quick to resort argued that those beliefs that are accorded legitimacy by to epithets (racist, subversive, pervert, hatemonger, nut, consensus, which is to say that everyone unthinkingly accepts crackpot, degenerate, un-American, anti-semite, red, commie, them, may even be more prone to appear on the extremist nazi, kook, fink, liar, bigot, and so on) to label and condemn agenda and more difficult to challenge or effectively debate. opponents in order to divert attention from their arguments When the word "extremist" is used as an epithet it usually and to discourage others from hearing them out. These epithets represents points of view with which we disagree, advocated don't have to be proved to be effective; the mere fact that by someone we dislike (but usually don't know) and whose they have been said is often enough. interests are contrary to our own. Political ideologues and 3. Irresponsible sweeping generalizations. Extremists tend special interests often attempt definitions of "extremism" that to make sweeping claims or judgments on little or no evidence, specifically condemn the views of their critics and opponents and they have a tendency to confuse similarity with sameness. while leaving their own equally strident and intolerant behavior That is, they assume that because two (or more) things, events, untouched. In the debate over abortion, for example, one or persons are alike in some respects, they must be alike in side or the other will condemn opponents as "extremists" while most respects. The sloppy use of analogy is a treacherous describing themselves as valiant defenders of human life or form of logic and has a high potential for false conclusions. champions of freedom. In fact, bona fide extremist elements 4. Inadequate proof for assertions. Extremists tend to be exist on both sides of this controversy, as do relatively calm, very fuzzy about what constitutes proof, and they also tend fairminded, honest, even-handed, and rational advocates. It to get caught up in logical fallacies, such as post hoc ergo is not the position they take, but how they take it that matters. propter hoc (assuming that a prior event explains a subsequent It has been said that "whoever defines the terms wins the occurrance simply because of their before-and-after relation- argument." The use of loaded terms and selective vocabulary ship). They tend to project wished-for conclusions and to that are biased toward certain forms of authoritarianism, exaggerate the significance of information that confirms their bigotry, and prejudice but not others, is another example of beliefs while derogating or ignoring information that the pervasive double standards one encounters in this area. contradicts them. They tend to be motivated by feelings more than facts, by what they want to exist rather than what actually The traits of "extremists" does exist. Extremists do a lot of wishful and fearful thinking. 5. Advocacy of double standards. Extremists generally tend Robert F. Kennedy wrote: to judge themselves or their interest group in terms of their intentions, which they tend to view generously, and others What is objectionable, what is dangerous about extremists by their acts, which they tend to view very critically. They is not that they are extreme, but that they are intolerant. would like you to accept their assertions on faith, but they The evil is not what they say about their cause, but what demand proof for yours. They tend to engage in special they say about their opponents. pleading on behalf of themselves or their interests, usually because of some alleged special status, past circumstances, In analyzing the rhetoric and propaganda of several or present disadvantage. hundred militant "fringe" political and social groups across 6. Tendency to view their opponents and critics as the political spectrum, I have identified a number of specific essentially evil. To the extremist, opponents hold opposing traits or behaviors that tend to represent the extremist "style." positions because they are bad people, immoral, dishonest, Other writers have delineated various extremist traits and unscrupulous, mean-spirited, hateful, cruel, or whatever, not where their criteria have been objective I have included them. merely because they simply disagree, see the matter differently, I am especially indebted to professors John George and have competing interests, or are perhaps even mistaken. Gordon Hall for their suggestions. Please let me caution you 7. Manichaean worldview. Extremists have a tendency to with the admonition, that we are all fallible human beings see the world in terms of absolutes of good and evil, for and anyone, without bad intentions, may resort to some of them or against them, with no middle ground or intermediate these behaviors from time to time. With bona fide extremists, positions. All issues are ultimately moral issues of right and however, these lapses are not occasional. Rather, they are wrong, with the "right" position coinciding with their interests. a habitual and strongly established part of their repertoire, Their slogan is often "those who are not with me are against so much so that in some cases their entire belief system is me."
14 FREE INQUIRY 8. Advocacy of some degree of censorship or repression tive" enough to challenge these claims. of their opponents and/or critics. This may include a very 13. Doomsday thinking. Extremists often predict dire or active campaign to keep opponents from media access and catastrophic consequences from a situation or from failure a public hearing, as in the case of blacklisting, banning, or to follow a specific course, and they tend to exhibit a kind "quarantining" dissident spokespersons. They may actually of "crisis-mindedness." It can be a Communist takeover, a lobby for legislation against speaking, writing, teaching, or Nazi revival, nuclear war, earthquakes, floods, or the wrath instructing "subversive" or forbidden information or opinions. of God. Whatever it is, it's just around the corner unless we They may even attempt to keep offending books out of stores follow their program and listen to the special insight and or off of library shelves, discourage advertising with threats wisdom, to which only the truly enlightened have access. For of reprisals, and keep spokespersons for "offensive" views off extremists, any setback or defeat is the "beginning of the end!" the airwaves or certain columnists out of newspapers. In each 14. Belief that it's okay to do bad things in the service example the goal is some kind of information control. of a `good" cause. Extremists may deliberately lie, distort, Extremists would prefer that you listen only to them. They misquote, slander, defame, or libel their opponents and/ or feel threatened when someone talks back or challenges their critics, engage in censorship or repression, or undertake views. violence in "special cases." This is done with little or no remorse 9. Tend to identify themselves in terms of who their enemies as long as it's in the service of defeating the Communists are: whom they hate and who hates them. Accordingly, or Fascists or whomever. Defeating an "enemy" becomes an extremists may become emotionally bound to their opponents, all-encompassing goal to which other values are subordinate. who are often competing extremists themselves. Because they With extremists, the end justifies the means. tend to view their enemies as evil and powerful, they tend, 15. Emphasis on emotional responses and, correspond- perhaps subconsciously, to emulate them, adopting the same ingly, less importance attached to reasoning and logical tactics to a certain degree. For example, anti-Communist and analysis. Extremists have an unspoken reverence for anti-Nazi groups often behave surprisingly like their propaganda, which they may call "education" or opponents. Anti-Klan rallies often take on much of the "consciousness-raising." Symbolism plays an exaggerated role character of the stereotype of Klan rallies themselves, including in their thinking, and they tend to think imprecisely and the orgy of emotion, bullying, screaming epithets, and even metaphorically. Harold D. Lasswell, in his book Psychopa- acts of violence. To behave the opposite of someone is to thology and Politics, says, "The essential mark of the agitator actually surrender your will to them, and "opposites" are often is the high value he places on the emotional response of the more like mirror images that, although they have "left" and public." Effective extremists tend to be effective propagandists. "right" reversed, look and behave amazingly alike. 10. Tendency toward argument by intimidation. Extremists Free Inquiry tend to frame their arguments in such a way as to intimidate others into accepting their premises and conclusions. To a quarterly disagree with them is to "ally oneself with the devil," or to give aid and comfort to the enemy. They use a lot of moralizing devoted to the ideals of and pontificating, and tend to be very judgmental. This shrill, secularism and freedom harsh rhetorical style allows them to keep their opponents and critics on the defensive, cuts off troublesome lines of We invite you to subscribe argument, and allows them to define the perimeters of debate. ❑ 1 year $22.50 11. Use of slogans, buzzwords, and thought-stopping ❑ 2 years $39.00 cliches. For many extremists shortcuts in thinking and in ❑ 3 years $54.00 reasoning matters out seem to be necessary in order to avoid Secular Humanist Bulletin or evade awareness of troublesome facts and compelling Subscription includes the counter-arguments. Extremists generally behave in ways that ❑ New ❑ Check or money reinforce their prejudices and alter their own consciousness ❑ Renew order enclosed in a manner that bolsters their false confidence and sense ❑ Visa ❑ MasterCard of self-righteousness. Acct. # Exp. Date 12. Assumption of moral or other superiority over others. Most obvious would be claims of general racial or ethnic Name superiority—a master race, for example. Less obvious are (print clearly) claims of ennoblement because of alleged victimhood, a special Street relationship with God, membership in a special "elite" or City State Zip "class," and a kind of aloof "highminded" snobbishness that 0utside U.S. add $6.00 for surface mail, $12.00 for airmail. accrues because of the weightiness of their preoccupations, (U.S. funds on U.S. bank). their altruism, and their willingness to sacrifice themselves Box 5 to Buffalo, New York 14215-0005 (and others) to their cause. After all, who can bear to deal FREE INQUIRY, Tele: 716-834-2921 with common people when one is trying to save the world! Call TOLL-FREE 1-800-458-1366 outside New York State. Extremists can show great indignation when one is "insensi-
Fall 1990 15 Propaganda differs from education in that the former teaches it. I recall seeing right-wing extremists celebrate the one what to think, and the latter teaches one how to think. assassination of Martin Luther King and leftists agonizing 16. Hypersensitivity and vigilance. Extremists perceive because George Wallace survived an assassination attempt. hostile innuendo in even casual comments; imagine rejection In each instance their hatred was not only directed against and antagonism concealed in honest disagreement and dissent; ideas, but also against individual human beings. see "latent" subversion, anti-semitism, perversion, racism, 21. Extremists often feel that the system is no good unless disloyalty, and so on in innocent gestures and ambiguous they win. For example, if they lose an election, then it was behaviors. Although few extremists are clinically paranoid, "rigged." If public opinion turns against them, it was because many of them adopt a paranoid style with its attendant hostility of "brainwashing." If their followers become disillusioned, it's and distrust. because of "sabotage." The test of the rightness or wrongness 17. Use of supernatural rationale for beliefs and actions. of the system is how it impacts upon them. Some extremists, particularly those involved in "cults" or Thus, extremists tend to have these things in common: extreme religious movements, such as fundamentalist 1. They represent some attempt to distort reality for Christians, militant Zionist extremists, and members of themselves and others. Extremism tends to be "feeling- mystical and metaphysical organizations, claim some kind of based" rather than "evidence-based," although the supernatural rationale for their beliefs and actions, and that selective use of evidence may obscure that fact. their movement or cause is ordained by God. In this case, 2. They try to discourage critical examination of their stark extremism may become reframed in a "religious" context, beliefs by a variety of means, usually by false logic, which can have a legitimizing effect for some people. It's rhetorical trickery, or some kind of censorship, surprising how many people are reluctant to challenge repression, or intimidation. religiously motivated extremism because it represents 3. Extremism usually represents some attempt to act out "religious belief' or because of the sacred-cow status of some private personal grudges or to rationalize the pursuit religions in our culture. of special interests in the name of public welfare, 18. Problems tolerating ambiguity and uncertainty. Indeed, morality, duty, or social consciousness. Extremists often the ideologies and belief systems to which extremists tend have motives they themselves do not recognize. to attach themselves often represent grasping for certainty Human beings are imperfect and fallible. Even an honest, in an uncertain world, or an attempt to achieve absolute rational, and well-intentioned person may resort to some of security in an environment that is naturally unpredictable or these traits from time to time. Everyone has strong feelings perhaps populated by people with interests opposed to their about some issues and anyone can become excited and "blow own. Extremists exhibit a kind of risk-aversiveness that up" once in awhile. Most of us still retain our basic common compels them to engage in controlling and manipulative sense, good will, and sense of humor. My purpose is not behavior, both on a personal level and in a political context, to establish some impossible standard that almost no one can to protect themselves from the unforeseen and unknown. The meet, but simply to suggest a better direction. The difference more laws or "rules" there are that regulate the behavior of between bona fide extremists and others is that this general others—particular their "enemies"—the more secure extrem- kind of behavior is the extremists' normal and usual way ists feel. of relating their values and feelings, and they usually feel no 19. Inclination toward "groupthink." Extremists, their guilt or sense that anything is wrong when they behave this organizations, and their subcultures are prone to a kind of way. The extremist subculture rewards and reinforces these inward-looking group cohesiveness that leads to what Irving behaviors, while the society of thoughtful and fair-minded Janis discussed in his excellent book Victims of Groupthink. people discourages it. "Groupthink" involves a tendency to conform to group norms and to preserve solidarity and concurrence at the expense One final note of distorting members' observations of facts, conflicting evidence, and disquieting observations that would call into he truth of a proposition cannot be inferred merely from question the shared assumptions and beliefs of the group. Tthe manner in which arguments in its behalf are presented, Right-wingers (or left-wingers), for example, talk only with from the fact that its adherents may censor or harass their one another, read material that reflects their own views, and opponents, or because they practice any other behavior or can be almost phobic about the "propaganda" of the "other combination of behaviors suggested in this article. Ultimately, side." The result is a deterioration of reality-testing, rationality, the truth of any proposition or claim must rest upon the and moral judgment. With groupthink, shared illusions of evidence for it. Moreover, the intensity of a conviction has righteousness, superior morality, persecution, and so on nothing whatsoever to do with whether or not it is true. To remain intact, and those who challenge them are viewed with dismiss a proposition out of hand merely because it is skepticism and hostility. advocated by obvious extremists is to dismiss it ad hominem, 20. Tendency to personalize hostility. Extremists often wish that is, because of who advocates it. In point of fact, extremists for the personal bad fortune of their "enemies," and celebrate are sometimes correct. They often deal with the "hot" issues, when it occurs. When a critic or an adversary dies or has the controversial issues many people choose to avoid. Before a serious illness, a bad accident, or personal legal problems, you write people off as extremists, take a look at their evidence. extremists often rejoice and chortle about how they "deserved" It might be that they're actually on to something important. •
16 FREE INQUIRY Neutrality Between Religion and Irreligion: Is It Required? Is It Possible?
Ronald A. Lindsay
he Supreme Court in recent years has found itself justices on the Court—Blackmun, Brennan, Marshall, and sharply divided over the proper interpretation to be Stevens—is that such neutrality is required. Perhaps the Tgiven to the First Amendment's injunction that "Con- clearest articulation of this view came in the Alabama "silent gress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. prayer" case, Wallace v. Jaffree. In it, Justice Stevens, writing ..." Almost every significant establishment clause case in for himself and three other justices, stated that although at the 1980s was decided by a margin of one or two votes. one time many thought that the First Amendment "merely The decision in County of Allegheny v. ACLU, otherwise proscribed the preference of one Christian sect for another known as the creche/menorah case, rendered at the end of [and did] not require equal respect for the conscience of the the Court's term in 1989, is no exception to this pattern. Indeed, infidel, the atheist, or the adherent of a non-Christian faith the Court actually split three different ways, as Justices Black- such as Islam or Judaism ... the Court has unambiguously mun and O'Connor found the way the menorah was displayed concluded that individual freedom of conscience protected was acceptable, but that the creche display was unconstitu- by the First Amendment embraces the right to select any tional. Justices Stevens, Brennan, and Marshall concluded religious faith or none at all." Stevens then quoted approvingly both displays were unconstitutional, and Justices Kennedy, from prior Court decisions that held that the First Amendment White, Scalia, and Rehnquist concluded, as usual, that prohibits the government from imposing "requirements which "anything goes." However, more important than the specific aid all religions as against nonbelievers." issues resolved by the case were the theoretical justifications However, there is a contrary view that commands the votes the justices offered for their conclusions. From these it is of four other justices—White, Rehnquist, Scalia, and Kennedy. apparent that the Court is evenly—and hotly—divided over As Justice Kennedy's dissent in the creche/menorah case a fundamental question of First Amendment interpretation. indicates, these four justices believe that there is a need for The passion in this controversy is evidenced by some of the "substantial revision" in establishment clause doctrine, and forceful language in the Court's opinions. In arguing that there they are eagerly awaiting the opportunity to carry out this is a need for "substantial revision" of current First Amendment revision. doctrine, Justice Kennedy accused Justice Blackmun of The way in which these justices would like to revise the decision— engaging in an "Orwellian" rewriting of history, which led law is again illustrated by the Wallace v. Jaffree to Justice Blackmun's retort that Kennedy's accusations "could this time by the bitter dissent of Justice Rehnquist. Utilizing be said to be as offensive as they are absurd." a pseudo-scholarly approach, Rehnquist argued for his view What is the nub of this dispute? What is the issue that by purportedly tracing the evolution of the language of the First Amendment, from the time it was introduced by James appears to be dividing the justices into irreconcilable camps? Madison in the House of Representatives until its final Obviously, the issue is not whether there should be freedom approval by both houses of Congress. According to Rehnquist, of religion, since all parties to the debate at least give lip an examination of the legislative history of the First service to this principle. No, the issue is whether the First Amendment reveals that the framers of the Constitution merely Amendment not only prohibits the government from favoring intended "to stop the federal government from asserting a one particular religion over others, but also prohibits the preference for one religious denomination or sect over others," government from favoring religion in general. In other words, and did not mean to require "government to be strictly neutral the issue is whether the First Amendment requires the state between religion and irreligion." to be neutral between religion and irreligion. Who's right? Before answering that question, we should The view that is currently accepted by at least four of the remind ourselves of what is at stake here. If the views of Ronald A. Lindsay is an attorney in Washington, D.C. and Rehnquist and his cohorts prevail, and they may lack only a contributing editor of FREE INQUIRY. He is also an ad- one more vote to pass from the dissenting to the majority junct professor of philosophy at Georgetown University. This view, there will be a radical restructuring of church-state article is based on a speech Mr. Lindsay gave late last year, relations. Prayer in the schools? Why not? There is probably prior to the resignation of Justice Brennan from the Supreme some nondenominational prayer that can be devised that could Court. be said to show no preference for one religion over another. Enactment and enforcement of blasphemy laws? A blasphemy
Fall 1990 17 law that prohibited disparagement of any religion would be designed to require the government to be neutral between "nonpreferential" and therefore could pass muster under the believers and nonbelievers. Rehnquist version of the establishment clause. Of course, such From this positive and negative evidence, Rehnquist a law might be in conflict with another clause of the First concludes that those who proposed and adopted the First Amendment, the one prohibiting any law "abridging the Amendment were "definitely not concerned about whether freedom of speech," but the Rehnquist Court could find that the government might aid all religions evenhandedly," and an appropriately worded blasphemy law fits under the "fighting that there is not "the slightest indication" that they thought words" exception to the free speech clause. After all, we know the government had to be "absolutely neutral as between that the religious are often very upset by criticism of their religion and irreligion." beliefs, or even by criticism of religion in general. But an objective analysis of the evidence Rehnquist presents Undoubtedly, though, the most important and predictable reveals that it is ambiguous at best. Moreover, some of the consequence of this potential revision of establishment clause evidence he ignores, including versions of the amendment that doctrine would be in the area of public funding of religious were rejected in the Senate that would have allowed for institutions, in particular sectarian schools. The Catholic nonpreferential aid to religion, effectively disprove his thesis. church has long lusted after public support of its school system, Let us first examine Madison's proposal to insert the word and in the past decade it has been joined in this quest by "national" before the word "religion" in the language of the Protestant fundamentalists. Whether this support were to take amendment. To find the most likely explanation for this the form of direct grants to the schools, vouchers to parents, proposal we need to remind ourselves that the First or some other scheme to plunder the treasury, you can be Amendment, as originally proposed, adopted, and ratified, sure that public money would be flowing in some form or limited only the federal government, not the states. In fact, another to these religious indoctrination centers. As long as it was only about fifty years ago that the Supreme Court funding is offered to all religious schools, there is no violation first held that the establishment clause limited what the states on Rehnquist's interpretation of the establishment clause. could do. Some states maintained established churches after Naturally, this means that the nonreligious will be compelled the passage of the First Amendment; indeed, Massachusetts to support institutions that are inimical to their own beliefs. maintained its established church until the 1830s. Thus, the Given the important consequences of Rehnquist's view of most likely explanation of Madison's proposed addition of the establishment clause, we need to determine whether he the word "national" is that Madison, to allay some concerns has made a convincing case for his interpretation. He has about the effect of the amendment on state establishments, not. merely wanted to emphasize that the clause bound only the The evidence that Rehnquist presents in favor of his federal government. interpretation, what has been labeled the "nonpreferential" In any event, Madison's proposal was rejected by his fellow interpretation, is both positive and negative in nature. The members. Even if we acknowledge, as we should, Madison's positive evidence derives principally from some remarks James important role in the debate on the First Amendment, it is Madison made during the debate on the amendment in the intellectually reckless to argue for a particular interpretation House of Representatives. One of the representatives had of the amendment on the basis of modifying language that expressed the fear that the language then under consideration was considered and rejected. Thus, Madison's proposal to might prohibit the courts from hearing lawsuits that sought add the word "national" and the remarks he made in support to compel contributions to churches. A number of states had of that proposal do not show that the establishment clause an established church at this time or required their citizens allows for nonpreferential aid to religion. to contribute to some church. The proposed language under More important, Rehnquist virtually ignores the evolution consideration by the House at the time was: "No religion of the language of the amendment in the Senate and in the shall be established by law, nor shall the equal rights of House-Senate Conference Committee. It is true that the conscience be infringed." debates in the Senate and the Conference Committee were Madison responded to the representative's remarks by not recorded, so we do not know what was said in support stating that insertion of the word "national" before the word of or against any particular proposal during those debates, "religion" in the proposal under consideration would take care but we do know the proposals that were rejected. of his concerns. Madison then added that he thought the The House of Representatives sent to the Senate a draft amendment was designed to prevent one or more sects from of the establishment clause similar to the version ultimately obtaining "a pre-eminence" in the country as a whole and ratified: "Congress shall make no law establishing religion, establishing "a religion to which they would compel others or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, nor shall the rights to conform." of conscience be infringed." From this exchange, Rehnquist infers that it is "indispu- The first motion in the Senate clearly presented the "no table" that Madison viewed the amendment only as a means preference" position. The motion was to strike out "religion, "to prohibit the establishment of a national religion, and or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," and to insert, "one perhaps to prevent discrimination among sects." religious sect or society in preference to others." The motion With respect to the negative evidence, Rehnquist points passed. The proposal on the floor then read: "Congress shall out that nowhere in the records of the debate did Madison make no law establishing one religious sect or society in or anyone else specifically state that the amendment was preference to others, nor shall the rights of conscience be
18 FREE INQUIRY infringed." in some states was actually a crime. As a result, it probably If this proposal had ultimately carried the day, then never occurred to most of the framers to consider what the Rehnquist would have some substantial support for his thesis. effect of the amendment would be on the nonreligious. The proposed amendment merely limited Congress from However, if we accept that one of the underlying purposes "establishing one religious sect or society in preference to of the First Amendment was to eliminate the religious strife others." that had marred the history of Europe and of colonial America This proposal did not prevail. In a flip-flop unfortunately during the previous centuries—and the evidence is overwhelm- all too characteristic of legislative proceedings, the Senate first ing that this was one of the framers' purposes, if not their broadened the scope of the amendment considerably and then principal intent—it seems clear that today this underlying narrowed it almost beyond recognition. First it accepted a purpose cannot be effectively served by maintaining proposal that spoke of religion in general terms: "Congress government neutrality only among Christian sects. In a nation shall make no law establishing religion, or prohibiting the with as diverse a religious composition as ours has today, free exercise thereof." including a substantial number of atheists and agnostics, However, a week later, for reasons unknown to us, the religious conflict can be avoided only by maintaining neutrality Senate changed its mind and produced an extremely limited among all religions and between the religious and nonreligious. version of the amendment: "Congress shall make no law We have to apply the framers' underlying purpose to establishing articles of faith or a mode of worship, or contemporary circumstances. prohibiting the free exercise of religion." In short, the fact that none of the framers expressly dis- Fortunately for the history of this country, the House of cussed the effect of the First Amendment on the government's Representatives rejected this version and the Senate and House obligation to be neutral between religious and nonreligious formed a committee to resolve their differences. The version does not mean that the First Amendment should not be of the establishment clause that came out of that committee interpreted to protect the nonreligious any more than the fact was the one ultimately ratified: "Congress shall make no law that the framers did not discuss the effect of the Fourth respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free Amendment on wiretapping means that the government can exercise thereof." listen in on your phone conversations without a warrant. The language actually adopted is one of the broadest To conclude the first part of our discussion then, versions of the establishment clause considered by either government neutrality between religion and irreligion is House. Significantly, it forbids any law respecting an required. establishment of "religion"; that is, it is religion generally that may not be established, not merely "a religion" or "a national owever, some opponents of church-state separation have religion." Hquestioned whether neutrality between religion and In interpreting the Constitution, as is true in interpreting irreligion is really possible. They argue that any attempt to any legal document, we should focus on the final language exclude religious symbols, observances, or beliefs from the of the document, although the evolution of that language can schools or other public institutions necessarily favors atheism be instructive. Here we have seen that the House and Senate or secular humanism. Perhaps the most memorable example considered language narrower than the final version and of this type of argument came from Judge Brevard Hand rejected that language. One of the specific proposals that was in the notorious Alabama textbook case, Smith v. Board of rejected was a draft amendment that limited itself to forbidding Commissioners. Judge Hand, you will recall, found that in Congress from giving preference to one religion over others. the textbooks chosen by the Mobile County school system In other words, Rehnquist's interpretation of the First there were so many omissions about the positive contributions Amendment was explicitly considered and rejected. Therefore, of religion to American life that these books "conveyed an the only reasonable conclusion is that the First Amendment historical picture biased against theistic religions." These are must do more than merely require the government to be neutral some of the omissions that Judge Hand noted: among the various religions. Rehnquist's negative evidence for his thesis—that no House The religious significance of much of the history of the member described the amendment as a way to ensure Puritans is ignored. The Great Awakenings are generally not mentioned.... The religious influence on the abolitionist, government neutrality between the religious and the women's suffrage, temperance, modern civil rights, and peace nonreligious—similarly lends him little support. It is movements is ignored or diminished to insignificance. The undoubtedly true that the framers gave little thought to this role of religion in the lives of immigrants and minorities, problem, instead focusing on the need to prevent conflict especially southern blacks, is rarely mentioned. among the various Christian sects. That is because the country was much more religiously homogeneous than it is today. Moreover, Judge Hand concluded that because the positive There were very few Jews, Moslems, or members of other aspects of theistic religions were not discussed in these minority religions. With respect to atheists and agnostics, not textbooks, the nontheistic religion of secular humanism had only were there very few in number but they were usually been established by the school system. This conclusion inhibited from professing their beliefs openly. Not only did undoubtedly came as a shock to many, since Alabama had most states require citizens to be theists before they could never been thought of as a hotbed of religious skepticism. hold public office or testify in court, but professed atheism It is true that Judge Hand also thought he found positive
Fall 1990 19 weakness of the positive evidence he cited reveals that what of us who are thirty-five or older (somewhat younger if one he really was upset about was his inability to have his version grew up in the South) will have no trouble remembering the of Christian morals and history taught in the Alabama public evidence of this privileged position. Organized prayers were schools. For example, Judge Hand, in an earlier opinion in a matter of routine in public schools; indeed, many school the same proceeding, stated that that use of mild profanity systems went beyond this and even passed out religious tracts in a school literature textbook showed that secular humanism or held revivals on school property and school time. Textbooks was being taught as an established religion. Judge Hand's extolled the virtues of religion. The symbols of religious comments must be seen to be believed: holidays, both Christmas and Easter, were displayed on public property at public expense. Government meetings were opened [T]hough it might seem innocuous to some to condemn the and closed with prayer. use of the word "Goddamn" as it is used in the writings that The courts have put an end to some, but certainly not are required reading, it can clearly be argued that as to all, of this collaboration between church and state. In doing Christianity it is blasphemy and is the establishment or an so, the courts have upset many who assumed this was the advancement of humanism, secularism, or agnosticism. If the state cannot teach or advance Christianity, how can it teach proper way of doing things, the American way of doing things, or advance the Antichrist? and who did not see anything coercive, let alone unconsti- tutional, about such practices. Not unnaturally, they have Judge Hand's reasoning, is, to put it charitably, bizarre, interpreted the courts' actions as an attack on religion, when although humanists can console themselves with the thought in reality they were simply an attempt to put an end to the that, in Judge Hand's view, every time someone voices an privileged position that religion enjoyed. expletive, humanism is being advanced. Of course, if that were What about these specific examples that the opponents true then Nixon's Watergate tapes would constitute one of of neutrality cite as evidence of government favoring irreligion? the key sources of humanist thought! If we remove nativity scenes and crosses from public property, In the final analysis, what Judge Hand was really saying isn't the state promoting atheism? Poppycock. If a city hung was that if one does not teach Christianity, one is necessarily up big posters of noted skeptics—Hume, Russell, Ingersoll— teaching atheism or humanism. Recall that Judge Hand began in its courthouse, with some appropriate slogan such as "Glory his assault on the textbooks only after he was forced by the Be To Free Thought" on a nearby banner, that would be appellate courts to remove organized prayer from the public an endorsement of atheism. But that has never happened schools. Indeed, before the Supreme Court reversed him on anywhere in this country. If we forbid schools from having the issue of school prayer, Judge Hand candidly stated his organized prayers in the classroom, isn't the state promoting intentions: atheism? Rubbish. If students were forced to listen to readings from skeptics at the beginning of the school day, that would If this Court is compelled to purge [prayer] from the be an endorsement of atheism. But that has never happened classroom, then this Court must also purge from the classroom anywhere in this country. those things that serve to teach that salvation is through one's As shown by these examples, it is possible to be neutral self rather than through a deity. between religion and irreligion, and for the most part that is how schools and other public institutions have been What was implicit in Judge Hand's opinions has been made conducting themselves for the past couple of decades. Any explicit by a number of others. One of the theses in John violations of the neutrality principle have all been on the side Neuhaus' recent book, The Naked Public Square, is that in of religion. removing symbols of organized religion from public places I have saved for last discussion of Judge Hand's concerns the courts have shown a hostility toward religion and are regarding the history textbooks, because there is actually a establishing atheism as an official state doctrine. A number kernel of truth in his criticism. There probably is not enough of law-review articles have been written about the Supreme discussion of religion in history textbooks. There should be Court's supposed hostility toward religion. For example, in more. The whole story should be told. an articled entitled "The Myth of Religious Neutrality by By all means, there should be discussion of how the Pilgrims Separation in Education," one commentator argued that "[i]t and Puritans fled persecution—and how they immediately is ... impossible for individuals to be neutral on religious began persecuting dissenters here. Let us have discussion of matters, in the broad sense of the term religion." The author the Great Awakenings—and also of the witchcraft trials. There went on to argue that the exclusion of traditional religions were some religious influences on the abolitionist and civil from the public-school system necessarily has led to a privileged rights movements, but we would be negligent if we did not position for secular humanism. discuss the strong backing that the pro-slavery and segregationist forces received from the clergy. The role of hat is going on here? Do these arguments have any religion in the lives of immigrants and minorities should be Wvalidity? discussed, along with the essential role of religion in the lives What is going on here is whining: whining by individuals of Ku Klux Klan members. Yes, let us have ample discussion and groups who have been deprived of the truly privileged of religion in our textbooks, but let us hear the whole story. position they once enjoyed. For most of this country's history, Maybe then we can say our schools are truly neutral on the theism, in particular Christianity, has enjoyed favor. Those question of religion. •
20 FREE INQUIRY Fulfilling Feminist Ideals: A New Agenda
The feminist movement was begun and has been nourished by leading humanist women from Elizabeth Cady Stanton to Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, and Simone de Beauvoir. Humanism has always focused on the premise that all individuals are equal in dignity and value—and that women are entitled to equal opportunity to enter any field of endeavor without distinction, domination, or discrimination. Thus humanism and feminism are inextricably interwoven. The battle lines were drawn by earlier generations. We are beyond that now, but we still need a new agenda for the clarification and defense of women's rights.—ED. Feminism and Humanism
Joan Kennedy Taylor
any people assume that humanism and feminism scholars (Erasmus and Sir Thomas More come immediately are, in the main, contemporary movements, but to mind) whose works emphasized human life on this earth, in fact both have a long tradition in the history sparked by the rediscovery of classics that had been ignored of Western thought. The first humanists were Renaissance during the Middle Ages. Feminism has its roots in the Enlightenment, when a woman first asked the question: If Joan Kennedy Taylor is the national coordinator of the man is endowed with unalienable rights, why isn't woman? Association of Libertarian Feminists. Her most recent book, The Athenian philosophy and political science that were Back to Our Roots, will be published by Prometheus Books to provide the foundation for both the Renaissance and the in 1991. Enlightenment were developed in a society that had little respect for the people without rights who made it function—
Fall 1990 21 namely, women and slaves. Thinkers turned a blind eye to Schreiner at the turn of the century recapitulated Wollstone- the aspirations of these "others," and this tradition (with some craft's belief that if women are to bring up children they must exceptions) continued to inform Western society until the be fully educated in order to do so. Her contemporaries, like nineteenth century, when humanists and feminists alike began M. Carey Thomas, the first dean of Bryn Mawr college in to find such a blind eye intolerable. 1885, gave ringing defenses of higher education for women. Humanism and feminism both hold that reason, rather But androgynous education remained an issue to be defended than tradition or the pronouncements of organized religion, periodically. As recently as 1949, Simone de Beauvoir is and should be the guide to human conduct and the addressed herself extensively to in The Second Sex. organization of society. Although most of the challenges to Both the humanist and feminist traditions have identified religious orthodoxy have been in the name of humanism, and deplored restrictions of the freedom of the individual feminists too have made their challenges. An example is that have arisen from traditional stereotypes about human Elizabeth Cady Stanton, best known as an agitator for woman nature, whether legally or socially enshrined. Both have insisted suffrage. According to her biographer, Mary Ann B. Oakley, that the individual be allowed to establish relationships, join she was occupied during the last two decades of her life with associations, speak, listen, and learn—all the benefits that the attacking the bias against women promoted by organized great classical liberal thinkers intended for a society whose religion. In January 1885, when presiding over the convention limited government is based on rights and the pursuit of of the National Woman Suffrage Association, she supported individual happiness. Both humanists and feminists have heard a resolution calling on the Christian ministry to affirm that the siren call of socialism. men and women had no rights over one another, saying, "You A rational person plans, thinks ahead, has goals and may go all over the world, and you will find that every form purposes, analyzes problems. A rational person realizes that of religion which has breathed upon this earth has degraded individual action alone cannot solve all problems; some require women." The resolution was tabled, because of this argument cooperative effort. Taking it further, a rational person by Stanton's friend and colleague, Susan B. Anthony: "I found recognizes the need for specialization and the division of labor. long ago that this matter of settling any question of human Since all this is true, it seemed reasonable (particularly before rights by people's interpretation of the Bible is never experience forced us to look for a more sophisticated analysis) satisfactory. I hope we shall not go back to that war. No to postulate that the government could enlist the best minds two can ever interpret alike, and discussion upon it is wasted." to come up with solutions to really large problems and then When Elizabeth Cady Stanton became the first president use its clout to implement those solutions. of the National American Woman Suffrage Association in A man whose work particularly exemplifies this community 1888, her opening address not only spoke of the vote, but vision is John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), both a humanist and asked for equality in the churches and liberal divorce laws. an early feminist (The Subjection of Women is a classic on She attacked the Women's Christian Temperance Union, the subject). In his autobiography, Mill stated that he had saying, "As women are taking an active part in pressing on never had any religious assumptions, but reason led him from the consideration of Congress many narrow sectarian an exclusively laissez-faire framework to the thoughts that measures, such as more rigid Sunday laws (the stopping of he and his constant companion, Harriet Taylor, shared in travel and distribution of mail on that day), and the 1845 as he was writing his Principles of Political Economy. introduction of the name of God into the Constitution; and as this action on the part of some women is used as an argument We were now much less democrats than I had been, because for the disfranchisement of all, I hope this convention will so long as education continues to be so wretchedly imperfect, declare that the Woman Suffrage Association is opposed to we dreaded the ignorance and especially the selfishness and brutality of the mass: but our ideal of ultimate improvement all union of church and state, and pledges itself as far as went far beyond Democracy, and would class us decidedly possible to maintain the secular nature of our government." under the general designation of Socialists. While we Stanton even undertook, in 1886, the compiling of The repudiated with the greatest energy that tyranny of society Woman's Bible, a work that commented on all the passages over the individual which most Socialist systems are supposed of the Bible referring to women or excluding them specifically. to involve, we yet looked forward to a time when society will no longer be divided into the idle and the industrious; In November 1895 (shortly after her eightieth birthday), when the rule that they who do not work shall not eat, will Volume One was published; Volume Two appeared in 1898. be applied not to paupers only, but impartially to all; when It was a widely attacked because, as Oakley says, "to Elizabeth the division of the produce of labour instead of depending, Cady Stanton, the Bible was no more and no less than the as in so great a degree it now does, on the accident of birth, history and legends of a people as they searched for God." will be made by concert, on an acknowledged principle of justice; and when it will no longer either be, or be thought Another joint concern of humanists and feminists has been to be, impossible for human beings to exert themselves the education of women. Sir Thomas More felt strongly that strenuously in procuring benefits which are not to be women should be educated as men were, and Mary exclusively their own, but to be shared with the society they Wollstonecraft's 1792 book, A Vindication of the Rights of belong to. The social problem of the future we considered Woman (considered by many to be the start of the woman's to be, how to unite the greatest individual liberty of action, with a common ownership in the raw material of the globe, movement, and certainly the most readily available early text), and an equal participation of all in the benefits of combined was intended as a plea to the new French Republic to institute labour. We had not the presumption to suppose that we could such equal education. The South African feminist Olive already foresee, by what precise form of institutions these
22 FREE INQUIRY objects could most effectually be attained, or how near or at best. It included cooperative communities, and sometimes how distant a period they would become practicable. referred to any plan based on reason for the improvement of society. The problem, as I see it, with the Mill socialist He went on to say that of course such a society would vision, which I take to be a fair expression of the social require a "change of character" in both workers and employers, democratic vision generally, is not only that it shares this but he didn't see why that couldn't happen. general nineteenth-century fuzziness about how it may Today, more than 150 years after Mill wrote Principles properly be implemented, but that it is specifically lacking of Political Economy, the expected change of character hasn't in two areas, both of which have been addressed by F. A. occurred, and a number of governments have found grave Hayek. One is the issue of what sort of equality are we and problems in trying to distribute earnings "by concert, on an should we be talking about, when we speak of "all men" having acknowledged principle of justice." Mill himself would be been "created equal." Equality doesn't mean that you start horrified at the extent to which "tyranny over the individual" offf exactly the same, in the sense that there is an absolute has been extended in the name of principles similar to his. distribution of advantages. Beautiful children have an Socialist societies move inexorably away from humanism. advantage over ugly ones, but no one has yet suggested that The impersonal bureaucracies that they spawn, even when they be mutilated, and as Americans discovered with busing, they are democratic, as in pre-Thatcher England, result in a one-time seemingly equitable distribution of a good (such indifference to the individual. During the establishment of as integrated education) will quickly become redistributed the early British Health Care system, it instituted such measures according to individual wishes and opportunities in a society as posting in a London hospital that no patient over 65 who with any freedom. In his 1960 book, The Constitution of went into cardiac arrest was to be resuscitated, and lining Liberty, Hayek wrote, up surgical patients to be anesthetized en masse. Feminists have not been unmindful of how such an ideal From the fact that people are very different it follows that, of the sacrifice of the individual to the group impacts on if we treat them equally, the result must be inequality in their women. Betty Friedan, the American whose 1963 book, The actual position, and that the only way to place them in an equal position would be to treat them differently. Equality Feminine Mystique, is credited with having sparked the before the law and material equality are therefore not only contemporary feminist movement, gradually discovered that different but are in conflict with each other; and we can achieve Communists, in power or out, were not in favor of rights either the one or the other, but not both at the same time. for women. At the World Popular Conference in Bucharest in 1974, she wrote, "I saw a curious alliance of the Vatican, A great deal of the modern history of democratic socialism the Communists, and the Third World Nations (Latin America has been the unsuccessful attempt to avoid the inevitability and Arabs especially) oppose woman's right to control her of this conflict, because equality before the law was the first own body and equality for women as ... `irrelevant.' " On banner of the classical liberal revolution, which democratic a speaking tour of Italy in the 1970s she wrote, "The revolution socialists do not repudiate. I am talking about is not revolution, Italian style. In Italy, The other problem with Mill's vision is the existence of revolution still means `communism,' and the Italian the interaction of unintended effects that Adam Smith called Communist Party, the biggest in Europe, is taking almost the invisible hand of the market and Hayek posited as a more the same reactionary line about divorce and abortion as the general phenomenon he called "spontaneous order." If much Catholic Right-wing parties." of what we label "tradition" is in fact such an unplanned She found that attempts in the United States to organize but functioning system, then when broad social changes take broad-based coalitions of women were generally taken over place it will readjust into other arrangements that we have by radicals, who wanted to maneuver women as a bloc. not foreseen. Birth rates rise and fall, young people seek or "[W]hat I didn't then understand," she wrote in It Changed reject formal education, families cling together or disintegrate My Life: Writings on the Women's Movement, "was the degree in patterns that only become apparent (if at all) some time to which our own political mobilization of women was after the fact. This is part of the dynamics of society when threatening to forces on the Left." When she went to interview spontaneous change occurs, such as changes in the social Simone de Beauvoir in France, she could no longer accept acceptibility of divorce or homosexuality or sex partners living Beauvoir's ideas: "I recognized the authoritarian overtones together outside of marriage, or of enthusiasms of religious of the supposedly Maoist party line I'd heard from sophomoric, belief or disbelief. Perhaps, like the cascading of waters that self-styled radical feminists in America." have been dammed up, it is even more of an upheaval when Finally, at the International Women's Year Conference in laws that have violated individual rights are repealed: no one Mexico City, she realized that the women's movement and predicted the number of abortions that would be performed feminism threaten Communists, who can't control them. "But after Roe v. Wade; certainly no one could have foretold the in Mexico," she wrote, "I suddenly had the insight that the social upheavals that followed the freeing of slaves when the women's movement itself was based on the values of American Thirteenth Amendment was finally passed. democracy—the belief in individual dignity and freedom, This fact of spontaneous systems occurring in response equality and self-fulfillment, and self-determination, as well both to other unplanned events and to government programs as the freedom to dissent and organize." is anathema to social planners. Planners have to assume that Socialism in the nineteenth century was a fuzzy concept a knowledge of past trends will predict future ones, and this
Fall 1990 23 is being shown to be dramatically untrue every day. If we take a mechanistic view of planning and predict that with large enough computer files and complete enough blueprints we can know enough to control the outcomes of a Humanist Heretic: socioeconomic system, we now understand that we are courting Priscilla Smith Robertson (1910-1989) failure. Reason, which led us to consider socialism, is showing us its fallacies. Even the socialists now know that central eautiful, intellectual, profound, witty, a consummate planning doesn't work. Beditor and writer: That was Priscilla Smith Robert- So how do we approach the valuable part of Mill's vision? son, who died of a stroke in Louisville, Kentucky, on How do we create a society in which men and women are November 26, 1989, at the age of 79. truly partners, and women are free to create their own destinies If accused of being a historian, humanist, heretic, she in the same way and to the same extent that men are? would gladly admit to all three. The only child of historian There's no substitute for doing it personally. The days of Preserved Smith (1880-1941), Priscilla was born in Paris the simple visions, when we thought that the right people but grew up in upstate New York. When her Revolutions in power could write utopia into the laws of the land, are of 1848 was published in 1952, Crane Brinton in The gone. In "Humanism and Altruism" (FI, Fall 1989), Tim New York Times found it "in the best tradition of what, Madigan reports that some readers have questioned the in a word perhaps significantly beginning to be wording of the fourteenth principle of the "Affirmations of overworked, we must call humanism." In her later An Humanism" on the back cover of the magazine, and asks Experience of Women (1982), about the "new woman" for reactions to the question, "Should humanists be altruistic?" on the eve of the twentieth century, she stressed the cross- The principle begins, "We believe in the common moral cultural relationships of female life in nineteenth century decencies: altruism, integrity, honesty, truthfulness, respon- Britain, France, Germany, and Italy. sibility." But "altruism" is ambiguous here. It is often used In 1934, Priscilla Smith married Cary Robertson, who as a synonym for "generosity" or "benevolence"; it also has was to become the longtime Sunday editor of the Louisville an opposite philosophical meaning of putting the welfare of Courier-Journal. They had three children—Charlotte, others ahead of ones own, or sacrificing oneself for others. Cary Jr., and Henry—and two grandchildren. Cary died Are we invoking benevolence, saying that we care for other in 1975. human beings and confidently hope that we can create a better After a stint as a junior-high-school teacher, Priscilla world together? Or do we hold that, if necessary, we will became an assistant literary editor at her husband's sacrifice some individuals (ourselves) for the good of others, newspaper. She also wrote articles for Harper's and because it is the only moral thing to do? American Scholar. She was an active member of the The first statement is compatible with libertarianism and American Friends Service Committee, and chaired the the mainstreams of humanism and feminism. The second Kentucky Civil Liberties Union during a particularly statement has been used to justify an inferior legal status for active time for civil-rights cases. women, as well as all socialism enforced by the state, whether In 1956, Priscilla became editor of the Humanist, it be democratically installed or tyrannically enforced. published by the American Humanist Association (AHA). As a feminist and humanist, I would hold that we must She envisioned the magazine as a focal point for reporting always begin with what Mill calls "the internal culture of the the latest developments in contemporary humanistic individual." From that, all societal good will arise; without philosophy. Top scholars in many fields were drawn by it, nothing lasting can be accomplished. The sum total of her magnetism and scholarly professionalism. individual choices is what makes social change. The individual In 1959, complaining to the AHA's board of directors is the one who must question any destructive assumptions that she had been censored and that she did not have of society, and is the only one who can keep from internalizing their support on a matter of editorial rights, she assembled them to his or her detriment. Consciousness-raising, fictional the editors for a weekend confab at Vassar, where the role models, real-life role models who speak out, androgynous entire staff agreed with her and resigned en masse. education, as well as free discussion, separation of church How Priscilla enjoyed students! While a Radcliffe and state, and academic freedom—if it is the internal culture Fellow, 1966-1968, she taught at Harvard. She lectured of the individual that counts, then these activities must be in history at Indiana University in Bloomington and other kept alive. Because other changes are meaningless without colleges. And how she loved children! Just a month before them, particularly in an age gone mad with what is considered her death she mentioned how pleased she was that she to be democratic ideals, when people vote or are polled on had two grandchildren "who can be supposed to carry everything, from flag-burning to trade sanctions. on the genetic heritage." What she undoubtedly meant Individual change has already changed society, and will was that she hoped one day they, too, would be historians do more. Some years ago, Gloria Steinern was asked on a of sorts, humanists with a small "h," and intellectual television talk-show what feminists wanted. And, clearly heretics. envisioning an open society with room for everyone, she answered, "Oh, we want the whole bag. We want humanism." —Warren Allen Smith I don't have anything to add to that. •
24 FREE INQUIRY New Hope for Women (And Anyone Else Who's "Man Enough" to Handle It)
Elizabeth R. Johnson
any women who today embrace humanism were phenomena. As a result, they assigned mystical, magical, and born into a cultural environment dictated by rigid ultimately divine interpretations to them. Hostile and punitive Mand stern religious dogma. The traditions that supernatural beings were responsible for earthquakes, floods, evolved from such dogma were equally rigid and stern, and droughts, swarming insects, pestilence, and death. How else escaping these stultifying traditions has, for some of us, been could people explain these threats to their well-being? fraught with frustration, widespread opposition, and To believe that our ancestors were capable of more resistance. Something within us wouldn't let us give up, reasonable and more civilized explanations and behavior is however, and during our struggle against discriminating and to believe they could transcend their own time. Nevertheless oppressive taboos, we became painfully cognizant of a ancient people unwittingly created a condition of havoc for sociological oddity: People attempting to enhance their own the human race and embarked it on a course of self-destruction. lot may indeed undergo change, but they do not necessarily Ensuing generations have compounded and aggrandized these improve. Clearly, such women didn't proceed directly from early errors, contributing beyond measure to the confusion theism to humanism in one breathless leap. How pretentious of a topsy-turvy world in which fiction became "fact," it would be to think so. Likewise, it would be false to claim falsehood became "truth," and blind faith became more we knew exactly what we wanted and where we wanted to precious than either. go. Who can say we were never lured by supernatural propa- A majority of people today continue to revere—with ganda? More often than not, we played into history's hands. varying degrees of credence—these tales of supernatural We acknowledged opposites and chose between them. And beings, handed down to them by their preliterate and the dichotomy with which we were confronted was not always prescientific forebears. However, giving credence to myths, between good and evil but, more frequently, between assumed superstitions, and other fantastic pretenses is almost incompre- good and assumed evil. hensible in our age of expanding knowledge and scientific Human beings have, since civilization began, created myths, discovery. Ignorance not only impedes progress, but accounts for much of the widespread chaos, violence, and suffering folklore, and superstitions. From these pseudorealities our so prevalent in the world today. forebears manufactured a panoply of goddesses, gods, angels, We have been a bit thick-headed, we humans. Rather than and other invisible—but divine—accoutrements. These primi- learning from history not to repeat the same mistakes, we tive inventions were thought to protect those who believed have used it as a guide and have been thus inspired to promote in them from a hostile world. But these products of human the mistakes of our forebears, determined to prove that imagination, as real to the credulous masses as reality itself, although primitive ideologies never served our ancestors well, have been the source of great quandary for humankind, re- they would nonetheless be our salvation. Inherent in human quiring people to worship unmerciful, deceitful, and treacher- nature, however, is the need to change rather than stagnate; ous gods and, at the same time, to pray to them for mercy, to improve, grow, and enrich our lives through inquiry and love, and guidance. Through the ages, people have believed discovery rather than to live by ancient dictates. Each and cherished their myths, worshiped and feared their generation, in its own way, struggles toward maturity, strives ambivalent gods. to develop its own identity, and makes decisions by choosing Primitive peoples experienced natural phenomena, but between two alternatives: the acceptance or rejection of existing unlike modern peoples, they had little information at their mores dictated by dogma. disposal, and thus were unaware of the naturalness of such This polarized, double-standards caste system involves a number of distinguishing characteristics. One, which I refer Elizabeth R. Johnson is a writer who has just completed a to as the "Assumed Negative," typically involves the "have- feminist-humanist novel, Gospel Truth, and is currently at nots": the exploited, submissive, selfless female; the powerless work on a collection of short stories and a nonfiction book "little woman," minority, slave, or child; society's scapegoat. entitled Life in the Vicious Circle. The Assumed Negatives are, in any culture, victimized and discriminated against because of their "innate inferiority." They
Fall 1990 25 are the insignificant, dependent, and oppressed. In the eyes of the orthodox Assumed Positive. The values of the of patriarchal societies deluded by false dogma, the servile unorthodox Assumed Positive are indiscriminately anti- Assumed Negative is incompetent and of little social value. establishment. Here are the drug dealers and gang members, But at the same time, such a person is "by nature" depraved and, at the most extreme end of the spectrum, political and capable of the most dreadful sins against God and terrorists, heads of organized crime, totalitarian dictators, and humankind. (Eve's pilfering fruit from the Tree of Knowledge ruthless warmongers. is the most egregious example of such deviltry.) This person The Assumed Negative and Assumed Positive (both is such a threat to society that she must be controlled by orthodox and unorthodox, obedient and defiant) approaches those who are most aware of her evil ways, those who judge toward life's vital decisions still prevail. Many among us are her and condemn her to a meaningless and mindless state. still susceptible to one or the other of these modes of brain- The polar opposite of the Assumed Negative is typically washing. And so today, many women, confronted with free- the dominant, self-righteous, self-indulgent, "independent," dom of choice, still feel they must choose between the old orthodox, patriarchal male. Traditionally the "haves" of ways of fundamentalism and the "new" ways of "liberation." society, often they are driven by ambition, greed, conceit, Following the traditional course, woman is prey to man's and a chauvinistic craving for power. Many consider "superior knowledge" and dogma. She learns that he has rights; themselves more "deserving" and more privileged than others. she has duties. His needs are important; hers aren't. She Free enterprise, law making, law enforcement, and preaching complies with his distortions of truth, his outright lies, his the gospel are a few of the areas controlled by this group. unreasonable expectations, and his unjust laws. The message Actually, however, the opposite of an Assumed Negative for her is, "Shut up and do as you're told—and, for God's is not a positive but an Assumed Positive. Few things are sake, put a smile on your face!" And, incredible though it more negative, self-defeating, tragic, or dangerous than an may seem, she manages to do just that! She appears satisfied Assumed Positive. Nevertheless, in their distorted world, the with this annihilation of her spirit, content in her subservient Assumed Positives command enormous respect. Historically, role, and convinced that pain, suffering, and privation are these powerful "demigods" have created rules and mandated normal conditions for women and other inferior beings. She laws for others to obey. They themselves have been exempt doesn't doubt that sacred truth for one blessed moment. She from such dictates. However, situations change over time. accepts her God-imposed inferiority, and she counts her Today, even the most powerful titans are expected to obey blessings. Her husband is her life-support system as well as the laws they create. They don't always do that, of course, her means to respectability. She pities her rebellious, and sometimes their corrupt activities are exposed in glaring unorthodox, "liberated" sisters. They don't know what they're fashion to an astonished, sometimes titillated, and often missing, poor things. enraged public. So-called liberated women, on the other hand, despise At the extreme end of the traditional Assumed Positive fundamentalism and reject the dependent lifestyle. Often, spectrum, where serious criminal activities occur, are the though they believe they're liberated, they aren't. Many have bigots, religious despots, vicious warlords, and ruthless tyrants in fact committed themselves to new "masters." responsible for all kinds of violent atrocities. These women are no less impressionable and gullible than Members of society who desperately cling to the age-old, their obedient sisters. Because they still need a "crutch," many undemocratic, and divisive Assumed Positive-Assumed of them switch from one belief system to another. Not Negative pattern of human interaction typically resist progress. surprisingly, a vast number of these individuals become Positive change is antithetical to their invincible faith and enthralled with the paranormal. Past-life regression, indisputable dogma. They will insist to their last breath that channeling, psychic healing, and ESP excite them to the core. any changes threatening the religious-based belief system and While they passively contemplate the supernatural, the world social structure are evil and must be eliminated. No price is passing them by. To whatever extent these escapists engage is too great to overthrow such evil. The Assumed Positives in such egocentric practices, they cannot participate in or and Assumed Negatives cling to their antiquarian dogmas contribute to social improvements or the advancement of the with a tenacity that is nothing short of incredible in an age human condition. To whatever extent they are involved with of increasing scientific enlightenment. "past lives," they cannot be involved in this life. Every age has its youths who conform to parental traditions This type of "liberated" woman challenges man's and accept unquestioningly the old values, idols, doctrines, superiority, yet begins to suspect her own. "God was (is) a and conventions of theism. They fall in line with the dyed- woman!" she claims self-importantly. in-the-wool conservatives, holier-than-thou conformists, Rejecting man's traditional demands, this rebellious woman stuck-in-a-rut fundamentalists. makes demands of her own. She creates turbulence and joins Every age also has its share of youths who pursue the her voice to other frenzied voices. She brazenly appropriates path of reckless defiance. Antagonistic to tradition, these man's "rights" and his "privileges." She imitates man at a young rebels turn to the "opposite" of established belief systems dangerous and demeaning level and assumes an authority and strict moral codes. They adopt unorthodox idols and based upon the adoption of his methods, values, ideologies, belief systems (different forms of mind control), "new" and vulgarities. She is critical of her conservative sisters. This obsessions, and what is often considered an unfortunate moral woman has become callous and lacks compassion. At the laxity. The unorthodox Assumed Positive is a counter-irritant same time, this macho woman wonders why she isn't satisfied
26 FREE INQUIRY with her hard-earned success, why it doesn't measure up to freedom—the likes of Abigail Adams, Lucretia Mott, Harriet her expectations. Beecher Stowe, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Harriet Tubman, So! If following tradition offers no release from frustration, and Margaret Sanger, and all peoples who struggled to and the nontraditional opposite offers only false hope, how improve the human condition from time immemorial. She can women and other emergents undergo positive meta- will say, like Isaac Newton and others before him, "If I have morphosis? seen further ... it is by standing upon the shoulders of giants." Must women, intoxicated by the new and heady experience This evolutionary woman enjoys an appreciation for life of emancipation, be satisfied to be equal, when equality means and a sense of its richness that has been denied women through they become slaves to their own promiscuity and victims of the ages. Although she would admit her life is not round- their own arrogant resolve? Must women be content simply the-clock bliss, she is happy to be alive. She knows what to exchange one form of limiting lunacy for another? trouble is; she's had her share. However, she has ignored It is no mere coincidence that women, young people, and seemingly insurmountable odds and has overcome incredible other oppressed peoples the world over are, as with one voice, obstacles. demanding their rights. Straining against and knocking down Even now, her life isn't a smooth ride. It isn't just one the barriers, they are demanding democracy and freedom. success after another. She makes mistakes and suffers And in many instances, they are rewarded with progress in disappointments. She may feel that life is like an old tire; that direction. Some are daring to exercise their new freedom just when you get it patched in one place, it blows out in in ways that contribute to their own enhancement as well another. But she sees these blowouts as challenges that as to progress of universal proportions. Others, however, are confront us all as we go about the business of living. content with the same old cliches. For them, there remain Disturbing, yes; sometimes heartbreaking. But this evolution- but two options—stagnation or false hope. ary woman doesn't sit at the side of the road, moaning about Social change, however, is continuous and inevitable. And the unfairness of life while waiting and praying for God to although the task of bringing about positive change may be patch the tire. Neither does she waste precious time wondering a difficult one, the situation is far from hopeless. Indeed, the what evil deed she committed in some former life to deserve prospects for positive change have never been better than they so much pain and suffering in this one. She gets up, takes are today. care of the repair as best she can, and goes on with her life— An impressive number of women, alert to humanistic again and again and again. principles, are experiencing personal growth while contributing Make no mistake about it, however. These women are in a vital way to improved social consciousness. They are not venturing into uncharted territories alone. As courageous aware that reasonable restraint, responsible attitudes, and wives, mothers, and daughters liberate themselves from ethical conduct are attendant to freedom. They are exposing traditional bondage, they find many bold men are also shaking the irrationality and primitivity of bigotry, racism, and sexism. off the undemocratic, restrictive shackles of the past and Their evolution is antidotal to destructive—often deadly— adopting a more humanistic attitude, philosophy, and lifestyle. assumptions. They are bravely working out their own destinies. In every Time is on their side, for today an abundance of available instance, these more mature and more responsible women information gives women a distinct advantage over women and men, while learning from the past but devoted to the of earlier times. Today's forward-moving woman, not lured present and the future, are displaying intellectual and social by promises of immortality, understands that she has only integrity combined with an impressive spirit of unity—the kind one life to live, and that it is right here and right now. She of unity never achieved by the diverse and hostile religions acknowledges her own potential and develops her own skills and ideologies. Bringing a new vitality, a new social conscious- and talents. Cherishing her intellectual and academic freedom, ness and conscience to human relationships, these individuals she is proving that women, like men, are indeed highly are doing their utmost to make this world a healthier and educable. And she is discovering a new kind of joy, the joy more civilized place. These women and men are the instigators born of her own successes. of meaningful change. They speak with the voice of reason, Today's woman is not encumbered by any spurious notions combating ignorance and stupidity with knowledge and of sexual inferiority, and she delights in her own achievements. compassion. Whether they are working at the home, Self-interest is not the motivating force as she approaches community, national, or international level, their positive influ- these larger objectives, wanting to do what is socially beneficial ence is unequivocal. rather than socially destructive, wanting to be kind and con- If they are not entirely free of supernatural beliefs, if they siderate rather than cruel and selfish. This modern woman have not totally abandoned their illusions, they are decidedly recognizes the need for replacing hate with compassion, heart- skeptical and increasingly secular. lessness with caring, and bigotry with unification. Cognizant Until recently, oppressed peoples lacked sufficient knowl- of human interrelatedness, she shares a passionate concern edge or freedom to inspect, question, doubt, or differentiate for the welfare of all the peoples of the earth, and she recognizes between good and evil. But the Assumed Negative and a common responsibility to serve the common good. Assumed Positive lifestyles—burgeoned with ambiguities, She is a woman of conscience. hopelessness, and conflicts—are relics of the past. This woman respects the legendary giants who preceded The Assumed Negatives and Assumed Positives are keepers her in the struggle for human rights, human growth, and of a flame that is doomed to extinction.
Fall 1990 27 Today, there is reason to be optimistic, for we are no longer it might seem reasonable and scientifically sound to thinking limited to these troublesome options. Those who have people that human beings are but an infinitesimal part of discovered the humanistic option and accepted the principles nature, in which all things are interrelated; that nothing exists of humanism are still relatively few in number. Although many beyond nature; and that the human species evolved and was people today have humanistic ideals, few refer to themselves not created. It might seem reasonable that ethical growth as "humanists." However we explain it—possibly they have (progress) and survival of the species is contingent on our never heard the word "humanism," or have never heard it thinking and behaving like rational beings, and that it is up used except negatively by religious propagandists—this lack to us, the human race, rather than an imaginary Supreme of exposure is disturbing, inasmuch as we all have the right Being, to save ourselves from self-destruction. and the need to be informed about matters that have vital Theists aspire to glory, abundance, and peace in the impact on our lives. hereafter for the righteous and the God-fearing within their Although the word "humanism" didn't appear until much own particular credal system, while humanists aspire to later, some of the ideals of humanism predate both Judaism goodness, abundance, and peace in the here and now for all and Christianity, and there is no reason in the world why peoples. Furthermore, those of a religious persuasion detest today everyone should not be aware of humanism and what what humanism stresses: the importance of human dignity, it represents. But a great fear of the ecclesiastics is that their as opposed to the perverse notion of original sin. Likewise, sacred dogmas will be imperiled when held up to scrutiny the religiously motivated condemn the humanists' commitment and contrasted with the principles of humanism. Powerful to reason and the scientific method rather than to blind faith and ambitious religious hierarchies deny the rights of and holy scripture, as a means of understanding ourselves individuals to inquire and to think for themselves. After all, (New Hope for Women, continued on page 55)
The Identity of the African Woman
rom the cradle to the grave, African is this done? Because he is rich enough of most of the continent, and about 70 Fwomen live in an environment to pay her bride price. In my opinion, percent of the labor force is supplied by shrouded in superstition. Some of these a girl should not marry until she is at African women, directly or indirectly. In superstitions provide justification for least eighteen years old; a man should wait order to recruit more farm hands, some societal norms, but many benefit no one. until he is about twenty-five. men marry as many women as possible. Everything is swallowed hook, line, and Early marriage deprives girls of edu- Women have to work hard to feed their sinker for fear of being struck down by cation. Most African fathers believe that families; and they dare not complain to an unknown superior force. Strict rules a woman's office is in the kitchen, and their husbands. They are obligated to govern every aspect of life, and are not that it is counterproductive to waste accept their position without question. questioned for fear of ostracism. resources on one whose destiny ends at In the political sphere, Ugandan For example, some tribes in Africa the front door. A high percentage of women can boast of twenty army officers, practice female circumcision to reduce dropouts are females. Due to financial and nine ministers, and thirty-eight parlia- promiscuity and promote fidelity. Of parental pressure, only 20 percent of mentarians. This is encouraging, yet the course, the lack of technical expertise female Africans find their way to higher home lives of these women remain among the "surgeons" can lead to infec- education. Those who do are subjected difficult, since there they are considered tions that can permanently affect the to male hoolinganism and even sexual third-class citizens, after their husbands reproductive system and even cause death. harassment. and children. The woman's position is The lucky girls who are able to survive Instead, money is pumped into edu- maintained by tribal superstitions and remain sexually insensitive and have little cating the boys. Even the African edu- taboos. or no libido. Contrary to the beliefs of cational structure is biased against I once overheard a traditional female some African men, female circumcision females. Admissions priority is given to say, "She is old enough to make you a can actually have an adverse effect on a men. As a result, information flow is poor. grandparent. Why not give her to some- marriage by making intimate relations When one marries, one is expected to one and get some money to look after unpleasant for at least one of the partners. reproduce. Yet lack of knowledge about the boys?" This practice is not only unnecessary but pre- and post-natal care leads to high Is that fair? That is what we face. Yet wicked as well. Yet the young girls of such infant mortality. About 70 percent of without education, how can one see reality tribes are looked down upon if they do African babies die before they reach the and wipe out dogma? We must embark not undergo circumcision rites. age of five. They are afflicted with diseases upon vast programs of education to Another bad practice based on super- such as diptheria, tetanus, measles, enlighten Africans about the way taboos stition is early marriage. Marriage pro- whooping cough, and polio; a high and superstitions hamper progress and vides financial and emotional security and percentage die from dehydration. Most development in society in general and in is considered a necessity in almost every African governments are doing their best the lives of African women in particular. African community. But it is not fair to to eradicate these problems though shove a girl of twelve into marriage with immunization and education. —Freda Amakye Ansah a partner the age of her grandfather. Why Agriculture is the economic backbone Rational Centre of Ghana