Soil Survey of Livingston Parish, Louisiana

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Soil Survey of Livingston Parish, Louisiana United States In cooperation with Department of Louisiana Agricultural Agriculture Experiment Station Soil Conservation Service Parish, Louisiana Summary of Tables Temperature and precipitation (table 1) ..................................110 Freeze dates in spring and fall (table 2). .................................11 1 Probability. Temperature. Growing season (table 3). ..............................................11 1 Suitability and limitations of map units on the general soil map for major land uses (table 4) ..................................................1 12 Percent of area. Cultivated crops. Pasture. Woodland. Urban uses. Intensive recreation uses. Acreage and proportionate extent of the soils (table 5) .................... 116 Acres. Percent. Prime farmland (table 6). ............................................... 117 Land capability classes and yields per acre of crops and pasture (table 7). .. 118 Land capability. Corn. Soybeans. Common bermudagrass. Improved bermudagrass. Bahiagrass. Woodland management and productivity (table 8). ........................ 120 Ordination symbol. Management concerns. Potential productivity. Trees to plant. Recreational development (table 9). .....................................124 Camp areas. Picnic areas. Playgrounds. Paths and trails. Golf fairways. Wildlife habitat (table 10) ...............................................127 Potential for habitat elements. Potential as habitat for- Openland wildlife, Woodland wildlife, Wetland wildlife. Building site development (table 11) .....................................129 Shallow excavations. Dwellings without basements. Small commercial buildings. Local roads and streets. Lawns and landscaping. Sanitary facilities (table 12) .............................................132 Septic tank absorption fields. Sewage lagoon areas. Trench sanitary landfill. Area sanitary landfill. Daily cover for landfill. Construction materials (table 13) ........................................135 Roadfill. Sand. Gravel. Topsoil. Water management (table 14). ..........................................137 Limitations for-Embankments, dikes, and levees; Aquifer- fed excavated ponds. Features affecting-Drainage, Irrigation, Terraces and diversions, Grassed waterways. Engineering index properties (table 15) ..................................140 Depth. USDA texture. Classification-Unified, AASHTO. Percentage passing sieve number-4, 10, 40, 200. Liquid limit. Plasticity index. Physical and chemical properties of the soils (table 16). ................... 144 Depth. Clay. Moist bulk density. Permeability. Available water capacity. Soil reaction. Shrink-swell potential. Erosion factors. Organic matter. Soil and water features (table 17) .......................................147 Hydrologic group. Flooding. High water table. Subsidence. Risk of corrosion. Fertility test data for selected soils (table 18) ............................. 149 Depth. Horizon. pH. Organic matter content. Extractable phosphorus. Exchangeable cations. Total acidity. Effective cation-exchange capacity. Cation-exchange capacity. Base saturation. Saturation. Physical test data for selected soils (table 19) ............................154 Horizon. Depth. Particle-size distribution. Water content. Bulk density. Chemical test data for selected soils (table 20) ...........................156 Horizon. Depth. Extractable cations. Extractable acidity. Cation-exchange capacity. Base saturation. Organic matter. pH. Extractable iron. Extractable aluminum. Extractable hydrogen. Extractable phosphorus. Classification of the soils (table 21). .....................................159 Family or higher taxonomic class. Foreword This soil survey contains information that can be used in land-planning programs in Livingston Parish. It contains predictions of soil behavior for selected land uses. The survey also highlights limitations and hazards inherent in the soil,. improvements needed to overcome the limitations, and the impact of selected land uses on the environment. This soil survey is designed for many different users. Farmers, foresters, and agronomists can use it to evaluate the potential of the soil and the management needed for maximum food and fiber production. Planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers can use the survey to plan land use, select sites for construction, and identify special practices needed to ensure proper performance. Conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, wildlife management, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the survey to help them understand, protect, and enhance the environment. Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are shallow to bedrock. I Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. These and many other soil properties that affect land use are described in this soil survey. Broad areas of soils are shown on the general soil map. The location of each soil is shown on the detailed soil maps. Each soil in the survey area is described. Information on specific uses is given for each soil. Help in using this publication and additional information are available at the local office of the Soil Conservation Service or the Cooperative Extension Service. State ~ogervationist Soil conservation Service Soil Survey of Livingston Parish, Louisiana By Donald McDaniel, Soil Conservation Service Fieldwork by Donald McDaniel, Dennis Daugereaux, Wilton Stephens, Cynthia Corkern, and Betty McQuaid, Soil Conservation Service United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, in cooperation with Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station LIVINGSTONPARISH is in the southeastern part of Louisiana (fig. 1). It has a total area of 458,204 acres, 32,604 acres of which consists of lakes, bayous, and rivers. St. Helena Parish borders this parish on the north, and Lake Maurepas, Ascension, and St. John Parishes are on the south. To the east is Tangipahoa Parish, and to the west is East Baton Rouge Parish. According to the 1980 census, the population of the parish was 58,806. About 79 percent of the population lives in rural areas. Land use is primarily woodland and pasture. About 81 percent of the land area in the parish is woodland, and 3 percent is pasture. Currently, rapid urban expansion, particularly in the central and western parts of the parish, is a trend. The parish consists of three Major Land Resource Areas (MLRA's). The Southern Mississippi Valley Silty Uplands MLRA is used mainly as woodland, as pasture, and for truck crops. This MLRA consists dominantly of poorly drained and somewhat poorly drained, loamy soils in the northern part and poorly drained and somewhat poorly drained, loamy over clayey soils in the southern part. The Eastern Gulf Coast Flatwoods MLRA Figure 1.-Location of Livingston Parish in Louisiana. is used mainly as woodland. The Southern Mississippi Valley Alluvium MLRA is used mainly as habitat for wetland wildlife and as a recreation area. This MLRA consists dominantly of poorly drained and somewhat swamps of the Southern Mississippi Valley Alluvium poorly drained, loamy soils. This MLRA consists mainly MLRA. of ponded, mucky soils in swamps. Elevation is about Descriptions and names of soils in this survey do not 100 feet above sea level in the Southern Mississippi fully agree with those on soil maps for adjacent Valley Silty Uplands MLRA and at sea level in the parishes. Differences are the result of better information Soil Survey on soils, modifications in series concepts, and variations The average relative humidity in midafternoon is in the intensity of mapping or the extent of soils within about 60 percent. Humidity is higher at night, and the the survey area. average at dawn is about 90 percent. The sun shines The first soil survey of Livingston Parish was 70 percent of the time possible in summer and 50 published in 1936 (4). This survey updates the earlier percent in winter. The prevailing wind is from the survey and provides additional information. southeast. Average windspeed is highest, 10 miles per hour, in spring. General Nature of the Parish Agriculture This section discusses climate, agriculture, history, In Livingston Parish, farming has been important transportation facilities, and water resources in the since the earliest settlers arrived in 1750. At first, survey area. products were grown strictly for home use. Later, some farm products were shipped by river to New Orleans. In Climate 1880, 561 farms were in the county and the average farm was 179 acres. About 21 acres on a farm was Prepared by the National Climatic Data Center, Asheville. North Carolina. improved for cultivation. Corn, cotton, sweet potatoes, rice, sugarcane, and oats were grown on the better Table 1 gives data on temperature and precipitation drained soils, especially those along the Amite River for the survey area as recorded at Amite, Louisiana, in and along the other rivers. the period 1951 to 1979. Table 2 shows probable dates In 1930, the county's 2,193 farms averaged about of the first freeze in fall and the last freeze in spring. 210 acres in size. About 13.5 acres on each farm was Table 3 provides data on length of the growing season. improved for use as cropland and pasture. The main In winter,
Recommended publications
  • Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Workbook
    Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Workbook SEQR Environmental Assessment Form Guidance Documents The Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) is designed specifically for Type I Actions. It has three parts. The first part (Part 1) is filled out by the applicant, or project sponsor. Part 2 and Part 3 are the responsibility of the lead agency. Throughout the workbook, the term 'lead agency' is also referred to as the 'reviewing agency'. Part 1 of the FEAF provides details that will help the reviewing agency understand the location, size, type, and characteristics of the proposed project. Part 1 can be completed by the applicant using information prepared as part of the approval submission along with maps, plats, or other studies that may have been conducted and by exploring the information and maps available through the links in this guide. The lead agency should also review the information provided by the applicant in Part 1 for basic accuracy and completeness. Sometimes, the lead agency is also the project sponsor and there are no other agencies involved. An example of this is when a municipality adopts a local law. In such circumstances, the lead agency would also be required to complete Part 1 as the project sponsor. Part 2 is used to help the reviewing agency identify potential impacts that may result from the project. In order to do this, the reviewing agency will evaluate information from Part 1, but may also ask the applicant for clarification of information provided in Part 1, or additional information. Part 3 is used by the reviewing agency to determine if the potential adverse impacts identified in Part 2 are significant or not, and whether a draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) will be prepared.
    [Show full text]
  • Eating After the Triple Disaster: New Meanings of Food in Three Post-3.11 Texts
    EATING AFTER THE TRIPLE DISASTER: NEW MEANINGS OF FOOD IN THREE POST-3.11 TEXTS by ROSALEY GAI B.A., The University of Chicago, June 2016 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Asian Studies) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) August 2020 © Rosaley Gai, 2020 The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, the thesis entitled: Eating After the Triple Disaster: New Meanings of Food in Three Post-3.11 Texts submitted by Rosaley Gai in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Asian Studies Examining Committee: Sharalyn Orbaugh, Professor, Asian Studies, UBC Supervisor Christina Yi, Associate Professor, Asian Studies, UBC Supervisory Committee Member Ayaka Yoshimizu, Assistant Professor of Teaching, Asian Studies, UBC Supervisory Committee Member ii ABstract Known colloquially as “3.11,” the triple disaster that struck Japan’s northeastern region of Tōhoku on March 11, 2011 comprised of both natural (the magnitude 9.0 earthquake and resultant tsunami) and humanmade (the nuclear meltdown at the Tokyo Electric Power Company’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant incurred due to post-earthquake damage) disasters. In the days, weeks, months, and years that followed, there was an outpouring of media reacting to and reflecting on the great loss of life and resulting nuclear contamination of the nearby land and sea of the region. Thematically, food plays a large role in many post-3.11 narratives, both through the damage and recovery of local food systems after the natural disasters and the radiation contamination that to this day stigmatizes regionally grown food.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Year Review Include the Following
    THIRD FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT FOR THE DUTCHTOWN TREATMENT PLANT SUPERFUND SITE DUTCHTOWN, ASCENSION PARISH, LOUISIANA AUGUST 17, 2011 PREPARED BY: United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 6 Dallas, Texas THIRD FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT Dutchtown Treatment Plant Superfund Site EPA ID No. LAD980879449 Dutchtown, Ascension Parish, Louisiana This memorandum documents the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) performance, determinations, and approval of the Dutchtown Treatment Plant Superfund Site (Dutchtown Site) third five-year review under Section 121(c) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 United States Code Section 9621(c), as provided in the attached Third Five-Year Review Report prepared by EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. (EA) on behalf of EPA. Summary of Third Five-Year Review Findings The third five-year review for the Dutchtown Site was performed through a review of site documents and site-specific requirements; a site inspection performed on June 1, 2011; interviews with personnel from the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) and ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller, Inc., the contractor to the Dutchtown Oil Treatment Site Participating Group (also known as the Dutchtown Steering Committee); and a review of data collected for the site during the third five-year review period. The site remedy included monitored natural attenuation of groundwater; maintaining the existing clay cap and fence; closing out the well on the former Watts (now Gaudet) property and drilling a replacement well; applying physical on-site controls such as access restrictions and installation of signs; implementing institutional controls (ICs) in the form of restrictions on future use of property, conveyance notifications, and/or restriction on use of groundwater from the site water wells.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Livingston Parish Council Livingston, Louisiana
    Minutes of the Livingston Parish Council Livingston, Louisiana November 8, 2018 The Livingston Parish Council met in regular session duly called, advertised, and convened at its regular meeting place, the Parish Council Chambers, Governmental Building, 20355 Government Boulevard, Livingston, Louisiana, on Thursday, November 8, 2018, at the hour of six (6:00) o’clock p.m. with the following Livingston Parish Council members present: Jeff Ard John Wascom Tracy Girlinghouse Garry “Frog” Talbert R.C. “Bubba” Harris Tab Lobell Maurice “Scooter” Keen Shane Mack Also present: Layton Ricks, Parish President Jennifer Meyers, Parish Finance Director Christopher Moody, Parish Legal Counsel Absent: Jeff Averett ------------------------------------------------- The chair asked the public to please mute or turn off their cell phones. ------------------------------------------------- The chair announced that Public Input would be accepted from any member of the audience wishing to address an agenda item. ------------------------------------------------ The chair addressed agenda item 7, “Public Hearing and Adoption of L.P. Ordinance No. 18- 24, “Authorization of …. GOMESA bonds”. The chair declared that the Public Hearing for L.P. Ordinance No. 18-24 was open and called upon Jim Ryan, of Government Consultants and also the Parish of Livingston’s Financial Advisor. Mr. Ryan read the ordinance by title. The chair asked for public input from the audience. Having none, he inquired if there was any input from the Councilmembers. Having no input from the Councilmembers the chair closed the public hearing. LPR NO. 18-328 The following ordinance which was previously introduced in written form required for adoption at a regular meeting of the Livingston Parish Council on October 25, 2018, a summary thereof having been published in the Official Journal together with a notice of public hearing which was held in accordance with said public notice, was brought up for final passage on November 8, 2018 on Motion of Garry “Frog” Talbert and seconded by R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • ALBUM TOP 50 - Manuscript
    Nacht v/d CD-Vreters 2013 - ALBUM TOP 50 - Manuscript 1 ARCTIC MONKEYS 'AM' 2 QUEENS OF THE STONE AGE '... Like Clockwork' 3 THE DELTA SAINTS 'Death Letter Jubilee' 4 NICK CAVE & THE BAD SEEDS 'Push The Sky Away' 5 THE NATIONAL 'Trouble Will Find Me' 6 DAFT PUNK 'Random Access Memories' 7 ARCADE FIRE 'Reflektor' 8 DAVID BOWIE 'The Next Day' 9 TRIXIE WHITLEY 'Fourth Corner' 10 NORTH MISSISSIPPI ALLSTARS 'World Boogie Is Coming' 11 PEARL JAM 'Lightning Bolt' 12 KURT VILE 'Waking On A Pretty Daze' 13 FOALS 'Holy Fire' 14 DAAN 'Le Franc Belge' 15 GARETT LEBEAU 'Rise To The Grind' 16 THE CHILD OF LOV 'The Child Of Lov' 17 JAKE BUGG 'Shangri La' 18 THE KNIFE 'Shaking The Habitual' 19 FLYING HORSEMAN 'City Same City' 20 POORBOYS AND PILGRIMS 'Aj't Geweten' 21 UNCLE LUCIUS 'And You Are Me' 22 CRYSTAL FIGHTERS 'Cave Rave' 23 CHARLES BRADLEY 'Victim Of Love' 24 STROMAE 'Racine Carrée' 25 PHOSPHORESCENT 'Muchacho' 26 LEE HARVEY OSMOND 'The Folk Sinner' 27 BEN HARPER & CHARLIE MUSSELWHITE 'Get up' 28 FLIP KOWLIER 'Cirque' 29 MILES KANE 'Don't Forget Who You Are' 30 ATOMS FOR PEACE 'Amok' 31 FLAMING LIPS 'Terror' 32 BOMBINO 'Nomad' 33 EELS 'Wonderful, Glorious' 34 GIRLS IN HAWAII 'Everest' 35 FRANZ FERDINAND 'Right Thoughts, Right Words' 36 JAMES HUNTER 'Minute By Minute' 37 UNKNOWN MORTAL ORCHESTRA 'II' 38 VILLAGERS 'Awayland' 39 GOV'T MULE 'Shout' 40 KINGS OF LEON 'Mechanical Bull' 41 BONOBO 'The North Borders' 42 DEERHUNTER 'Monomania' 43 CHVRCHES 'The Bones Of What You Believe' 44 PHOENIX 'Bankrupt' 45 DEVENDRA BANHART 'Mala' 46 NIGHT BEATS 'Sonic Bloom' 47 TEDESCHI TRUCKS BAND 'Made Up Mind' 48 JAMES BLAKE 'Overgrown' 49 MADENSUYU 'Sabat Matter' 50 SAVAGES 'Silence Yourself'.
    [Show full text]
  • Revising the World with Speech in Franz Kafka, Robert Walser and Thomas Bernhard
    Monologue Overgrown: Revising the world with speech in Franz Kafka, Robert Walser and Thomas Bernhard by Paul Joseph Buchholz This thesis/dissertation document has been electronically approved by the following individuals: Schwarz,Anette (Chairperson) Gilgen,Peter (Minor Member) McBride,Patrizia C. (Minor Member) MONOLOGUE OVERGROWN: REVISING THE WORLD WITH SPEECH IN FRANZ KAFKA, ROBERT WALSER AND THOMAS BERNHARD A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Paul Joseph Buchholz August 2010 © 2010 Paul Joseph Buchholz MONOLOGUE OVERGROWN: REVISING THE WORLD WITH SPEECH IN FRANZ KAFKA, ROBERT WALSER AND THOMAS BERNHARD Paul Joseph Buchholz, Ph. D. Cornell University 2010 My dissertation focuses on unstable, chronically unpublished prose texts by three key 20th century prose writers, quasi-novelistic texts whose material instability indicates a deep discomfort with the establishment of narrative authority qua narrative violence. I argue that Franz Kafka, Robert Walser and Thomas Bernhard, radically refunctionalized the device of interpolated “character monologue,” turning characters' speech from a narrative function, into a site where a text can be rewritten from within. In the Bildungsroman tradition, extended oral interpolations serve as an engine for the expansion and exposition of the plotted work, deepening the epic narrative world and exhaustively presenting a perspective that will be incorporated into biographical trajectory. I locate an estrangement of this practice: moments when oral monologues of fictional interlocutors “overgrow,” becoming an interventionary force that doubles, disrupts and re-frames the narrative discourse out of which it first sprouted. In showing how the labor of ‘world-making’ is split and spread across different competing layers of these texts, my dissertation contributes to the study of the narrative phenomenon of metalepsis.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana State | Senate
    OFFICIAL JOURNAL place at the Worldwide Spirit Association Grand Nationals OF THE cheerleading competition recently held in New Orleans. The resolution was read by title and placed on the Calendar for SENATE a second reading. OF THE SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 48— STATE OF LOUISIANA BY SENATORS HEITMEIER, MORRELL, MURRAY AND PETERSON _______ A RESOLUTION FIFTEENTH DAY'S PROCEEDINGS To commend the L.B. Landry-O. Perry Walker Career College and _______ Preparatory High School boys basketball team for winning the Fortieth Regular Session of the Legislature Class 4A state championship. Under the Adoption of the Constitution of 1974 The resolution was read by title and placed on the Calendar for _______ a second reading. Senate Chamber Introduction of State Capitol Baton Rouge, Louisiana Senate Concurrent Resolutions Tuesday, April 8, 2014 SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 65— BY SENATOR CHABERT The Senate was called to order at 3:10 o'clock P.M. by Hon. A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION John A. Alario Jr., President of the Senate. To designate November of each year as Culinary Careers Awareness Month in support of raising awareness of the culinary profession Morning Hour and the opportunities available to youth. CONVENING ROLL CALL The resolution was read by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading. The roll being called, the following members answered to their names: Senate Resolutions on Second Reading YEAS SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 42— Mr. President Heitmeier Perry BY SENATOR CROWE Allain Johns Riser A RESOLUTION Amedee Kostelka Smith, G. To commend the Republic of China, known as Taiwan, for positive Appel Long Smith, J.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC NOTICES Mr
    THURSDAY, APRIL 29, 2021 THE LIVINGSTON PARISH NEWS 15 PUBLIC NOTICE The Livingston Parish Sheriff’s Office will accept sealed bids until 10:00 a.m., May 17, 2021, for the purchase of the following: One (1) 2021 OR 2022 TIDEWATER BOAT 2500 25’ 2” CAROLINA BAY BASE CENTER CONSOLE 400HP ENGINE OR COMPARABLE MAKE AND MODEL Exact specifications can be obtained at the Livingston Parish Sheriff’s Office, Courthouse Building, Office of Jamie Felder, Livingston, Louisiana between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Bids will be opened at 10:00 a.m., Monday, May 17, 2021. THE SHERIFF RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY AND ALL BIDS. _____________________________ JASON ARD, SHERIFF PARISH OF LIVINGSTON Publish: April 29, 2021 May 6, 2021 NOTICE OF FIRST REVISED SEWERAGE SERVICES TARIFF Notice is hereby given that National Water Infrastructure, LLC (Company) filed First Revised Sewerage Services Tariff with the Louisiana Public Service Commission (LPSC) to add a Noncompliant Effluent Fee for Commercial Customers, which is a non-recurring charge applicable to each instance where a Commercial Customer’s effluent to the facilities of the Company exceeds 250 ppm (or mg/L) for Total Suspended Solids or 220 ppm (or mg/L) for BOD 5-d, 20ºC. The Noncompliant Effluent Fee for Commercial Customers shall be $500 per failed test performed by the Company for up to six failed tests in any consecutive 12-month period. Each failed test exceeding six that occurs during the same consecutive 12-month period shall be subject to a Noncompliant Effluent Fee for Commercial Customers of $1,000 per failed test.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Forestry Best Management Practices for Louisiana
    Recommended Forestry Best Management Practices for Louisiana CONTENTS ABOUT THE MANUAL ............................................................................................ lvii USING THE MANUAL .............................................................................................lviii INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................1 PLANNING FOR FOREST OPERATIONS...................................................................... 3 FOREST ROADS .........................................................................................................5 Overview ..................................................................................................................5 Permanent Roads ......................................................................................................5 Temporary Roads ....................................................................................................10 TIMBER HARVESTING ..............................................................................................13 Pre-harvest Planning ............................................................................................... 13 Streamside Management Zones .............................................................................. 14 Felling & Skidding Techniques ................................................................................ 19 Landings, Log Decks & Sets ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • La. Hwy. 22 Bridge Construction and Drainage Improvements
    REGIONAL RETENTION/DETENTION PROJECTS AND NATURAL FLOOD MANAGEMENT STATE PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS Louisiana Highway 22 Bridge Construction and Drainage Improvements PROGRAM DESCRIPTION In 2020, the Louisiana Watershed Initiative’s five coordinating state agencies selected 15 projects to receive $163 million in federal funding. The projects were selected because they align with the missions of these agencies and the long-term resilience objectives of LWI. Specifically, the projects will reduce flood risk in communities throughout the state, store floodwaters in ways that enhance natural habitats and move people in flood-prone areas out of harm’s way. As the granting agency of these funds, the Louisiana Office of Community Development reviewed the projects to ensure they meet HUD requirements and align with the state’s $1.2 billion CDBG-MIT Action Plan. PROJECT DESCRIPTION La. Hwy. 22 functions as a barrier impeding natural hydrology in the Amite River floodplain. The highway prevents the natural flow of water into the adjacent McElroy Swamp, increases surface elevation in the river and exacerbates area flood risk. The La. Hwy. 22 Bridge Construction and Drainage Improvements project includes the construction of two bridge structures and the excavation of two drainage basins for the purpose of improving local hydrology, reducing area flood risk and restoring the McElroy Swamp. COST ESTIMATE $ 41.7 million Aerial view of La. Hwy. 22 where project improvements will be implemented to reduce flood risk upstream of the highway and restore natrual hydrology downstream of the highway. PROJECT DURATION PLAN CONSISTENCY LOUISIANA CDBG-MIT MASTER ACTION PLAN (2020) Planning/Engineering Complete The project is consistent with the Louisiana CDBG- and Design MIT Master Action Plan’s focus on implementing “state-identified regional retention/detention, natural flood management and infrastructure projects.” OCD Construction/ TBD identifies flood control projects as unmet mitigation Implementation needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Download 1 File
    Starship Troopers by Robert Heinlein Table of Contents Starship Troopers Chapter 8 Chapter 1 Chapter 9 Chapter 2 Chapter 10 Chapter 3 Chapter 11 Chapter 4 Chapter 12 Chapter 5 Chapter 13 Chapter 6 Chapter 14 Chapter 7 Chapter 1 Come on, you apes! You wanta live forever? — Unknown platoon sergeant, 1918 I always get the shakes before a drop. I’ve had the injections, of course, and hypnotic preparation, and it stands to reason that I can’t really be afraid. The ship’s psychiatrist has checked my brain waves and asked me silly questions while I was asleep and he tells me that it isn’t fear, it isn’t anything important — it’s just like the trembling of an eager race horse in the starting gate. I couldn’t say about that; I’ve never been a race horse. But the fact is: I’m scared silly, every time. At D-minus-thirty, after we had mustered in the drop room of theRodger Young , our platoon leader inspected us. He wasn’t our regular platoon leader, because Lieutenant Rasczak had bought it on our last drop; he was really the platoon sergeant, Career Ship’s Sergeant Jelal. Jelly was a Finno-Turk from Iskander around Proxima — a swarthy little man who looked like a clerk, but I’ve seen him tackle two berserk privates so big he had to reach up to grab them, crack their heads together like coconuts, step back out of the way while they fell. Off duty he wasn’t bad — for a sergeant.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\TEMP\Copy of HB656
    ENROLLED Regular Session, 2012 ACT No. 588 HOUSE BILL NO. 656 BY REPRESENTATIVE DOVE 1 AN ACT 2 To amend and reenact R.S. 49:214.24(C) and (D) and 214.34(A)(introductory paragraph), 3 (1), and (5) and (B) and to enact R.S. 49:214.34(C), relative to the coastal zone 4 boundary; to redraw the coastal zone boundary; to provide relative to determination 5 of fastlands within the coastal zone; to provide relative to required coastal use 6 permits within the coastal zone; and to provide for related matters. 7 Be it enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana: 8 Section 1. R.S. 49:214.24(C) and (D) and 214.34(A)(introductory paragraph), (1), 9 and (5) and (B) are hereby amended and reenacted and R.S. 49:214.34(C) is hereby enacted 10 to read as follows: 11 §214.24. Coastal zone boundary 12 * * * 13 C. The inland boundary of the coastal zone shall generally be a line 14 beginning at the intersection of the northern line of the Intracoastal Canal and the 15 Louisiana/Texas boundary, thence proceeding easterly along the northern bank of the 16 Intracoastal Canal to Highway 82, thence northeasterly along Highway 82 to 17 Highway 690, thence easterly along Highway 690 to Highway 330, thence 18 northeasterly along Highway 330 to Highway 14, thence easterly along Highway 14 19 to Highway 90, thence southeasterly along Highway 90 to Highway 85, thence 20 northeasterly along Highway 85 to Highway 90, thence easterly along Highway 90 21 to the intersection of Highway 90 and the East Atchafalaya Basin Protection Levee Page 1 of 11 CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored are additions.
    [Show full text]