DOCSLIB.ORG

Five Year Review Include the Following

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Five Year Review Include the Following THIRD FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT FOR THE DUTCHTOWN TREATMENT PLANT SUPERFUND SITE DUTCHTOWN, ASCENSION PARISH, LOUISIANA AUGUST 17, 2011 PREPARED BY: United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 6 Dallas, Texas THIRD FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT Dutchtown Treatment Plant Superfund Site EPA ID No. LAD980879449 Dutchtown, Ascension Parish, Louisiana This memorandum documents the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) performance, determinations, and approval of the Dutchtown Treatment Plant Superfund Site (Dutchtown Site) third five-year review under Section 121(c) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 United States Code Section 9621(c), as provided in the attached Third Five-Year Review Report prepared by EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. (EA) on behalf of EPA. Summary of Third Five-Year Review Findings The third five-year review for the Dutchtown Site was performed through a review of site documents and site-specific requirements; a site inspection performed on June 1, 2011; interviews with personnel from the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) and ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller, Inc., the contractor to the Dutchtown Oil Treatment Site Participating Group (also known as the Dutchtown Steering Committee); and a review of data collected for the site during the third five-year review period. The site remedy included monitored natural attenuation of groundwater; maintaining the existing clay cap and fence; closing out the well on the former Watts (now Gaudet) property and drilling a replacement well; applying physical on-site controls such as access restrictions and installation of signs; implementing institutional controls (ICs) in the form of restrictions on future use of property, conveyance notifications, and/or restriction on use of groundwater from the site water wells. The remedial action (RA) was initiated in July 1997 with site mobilization; construction completion was attained in January 1998. Operation and maintenance (O&M) activities were scheduled quarterly for the first year after the RA, then semiannually from years 2 through 5. Starting in year 6, O&M activities were scheduled annually. The previous Five-Year Review Report (EPA 2007) stated that monitoring wells MW-10, MW-14, and MW-20 were lost, and they remain lost at the time of the current review. To date, the french drain located on the western edge of the site has not been formally investigated for the site-specific contaminants of concern (COCs). Monitoring wells MW-16 and MW-17 were plugged and abandoned in December 2003. The removal of these wells prevents monitoring of the groundwater south of the cap. Monitoring well MW-12 was plugged and abandoned in 2007. The third five-year review found that the selected remedy is performing as intended, and is protective of human health and the environment. The remedy will be protective in the long term provided the land use remains unchanged and site maintenance continues. Actions Recommended The O&M Plan should be updated to reflect the current monitoring network as well as provide an analysis of whether the lost monitoring wells (i.e., MW-10, MW-14, and MW-20) could provide a conduit for contamination to lower ground water intervals. A plugging and abandonment report should be provided for MW-12. The branches that have fallen on the fence should be removed and minor damage to the fence should be repaired. Should site land use change in the future, then it may be necessary to sample the french drain for the Dutchtown Site COCs. Based on the analytical results, future actions can be determined concerning the final disposition of the french drain. If development is proposed in the future, it may also be necessary to add one or more monitoring wells along the south side of the cap. Additional 1 rcs and/or access controls should also be considered at that time, to ensure that the selected remedy remains protective of human health and the environment. Site inspections should continue to be performed at least once per year to check the condition ofthe cap and site access restrictions (fencing and warning signs), and miscellaneous repairs and mowing should be performed as necessary to maintain current conditions. Determinations r have determined that the remedy for the Dutchtown Treatment Plant Superfund Site is protective of human health and the environment and that current human exposure is controlled. Thus the remedy is protective, and it will remain so provided the action items herein are addressed and corrective actions implemented. Samuel Coleman, P.E. Date I 1 Director Superfund Division, Region 6 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 CONCURRENCES: THIRD FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT DUTCHTOWN TREATMENT PLANT SUPERFUND SITE EPA ID No. LAD980879449 By: 1)ddJcfJJv Date: -----=-~L-----13.__L_0___'_11__ _ MfChaelHebert, U.S. EPA Remedial Project Manager By Date: f UI &f4; ~ ----4//3~~---------- Cathy Gilmore, U.S. EPA Section Chief, LouisianalNew Mexico/Oklahoma Section Date: Donald Williams, U.S. EPA -»';----/------+---/(n- B~;;fanCh Date: -----;~~,-------g,----v--(J~~-- 41i'£. Faultry, U.S. EPA / Associate Director, edial Branch Date: _?!----'--1-'---9tiJ__ B y : ~:::::::::~~~~~===-____ Date: ~/Il ! ( Mark Peycke, U. ----~,~~--------- Chief, Superfund Branch, Office of Regional Counsel Date: _0-'--U_7 <-----/I__f B Y ~Pam Phillips,~ ~ U.S. EPar Deputy Director, Superfund Division 3 CONTENTS Section Page LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................... iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SITE CHRONOLOGY .................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 4 3.1 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS .................................................................................... 5 3.2 LAND AND RESOURCE USE ......................................................................................... 5 3.3 HISTORY OF CONTAMINATION .................................................................................. 5 3.4 INITIAL RESPONSE ......................................................................................................... 5 3.5 BASIS FOR TAKING ACTION ........................................................................................ 6 4.0 REMEDIAL ACTIONS................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 SELECTED REMEDY ....................................................................................................... 7 4.2 REMEDY IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................................... 8 4.3 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE .............................................................................. 8 4.4 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COST ................................................................. 10 5.0 PROGRESS SINCE THE SECOND FIVE-YEAR REVIEW....................................................... 10 5.1 PROTECTIVENESS STATEMENT FROM SECOND FIVE-YEAR REVIEW ............ 10 5.2 SECOND FIVE-YEAR REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS AND FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS ......................................................................................................................... 11 5.3 STATUS OF RECOMMENDED ACTIONS ................................................................... 11 6.0 FIVE-YEAR REVIEW PROCESS ................................................................................................ 12 6.1 ADMINISTRATIVE COMPONENTS ............................................................................ 12 6.2 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT ................................................................................... 12 6.3 DOCUMENT REVIEW ................................................................................................... 12 6.4 DATA REVIEW ............................................................................................................... 13 6.5 APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT AND APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENT REVIEW .. 14 6.5.1 Chemical-Specific Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements ........ 15 6.5.2 Action-Specific Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements ............ 16 6.5.3 Location-Specific Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements ......... 16 6.6 SITE INSPECTION .......................................................................................................... 16 6.7 SITE INTERVIEWS ......................................................................................................... 17 7.0 TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................... 18 7.1 QUESTION A: IS THE REMEDY FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED BY THE DECISION DOCUMENTS? YES. .................................................................................. 18 7.2 QUESTION B: ARE THE ASSUMPTIONS USED AT THE TIME OF REMEDY SELECTION
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Louisiana State | Senate
    OFFICIAL JOURNAL place at the Worldwide Spirit Association Grand Nationals OF THE cheerleading competition recently held in New Orleans. The resolution was read by title and placed on the Calendar for SENATE a second reading. OF THE SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 48— STATE OF LOUISIANA BY SENATORS HEITMEIER, MORRELL, MURRAY AND PETERSON _______ A RESOLUTION FIFTEENTH DAY'S PROCEEDINGS To commend the L.B. Landry-O. Perry Walker Career College and _______ Preparatory High School boys basketball team for winning the Fortieth Regular Session of the Legislature Class 4A state championship. Under the Adoption of the Constitution of 1974 The resolution was read by title and placed on the Calendar for _______ a second reading. Senate Chamber Introduction of State Capitol Baton Rouge, Louisiana Senate Concurrent Resolutions Tuesday, April 8, 2014 SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 65— BY SENATOR CHABERT The Senate was called to order at 3:10 o'clock P.M. by Hon. A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION John A. Alario Jr., President of the Senate. To designate November of each year as Culinary Careers Awareness Month in support of raising awareness of the culinary profession Morning Hour and the opportunities available to youth. CONVENING ROLL CALL The resolution was read by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading. The roll being called, the following members answered to their names: Senate Resolutions on Second Reading YEAS SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 42— Mr. President Heitmeier Perry BY SENATOR CROWE Allain Johns Riser A RESOLUTION Amedee Kostelka Smith, G. To commend the Republic of China, known as Taiwan, for positive Appel Long Smith, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Forestry Best Management Practices for Louisiana
    Recommended Forestry Best Management Practices for Louisiana CONTENTS ABOUT THE MANUAL ............................................................................................ lvii USING THE MANUAL .............................................................................................lviii INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................1 PLANNING FOR FOREST OPERATIONS...................................................................... 3 FOREST ROADS .........................................................................................................5 Overview ..................................................................................................................5 Permanent Roads ......................................................................................................5 Temporary Roads ....................................................................................................10 TIMBER HARVESTING ..............................................................................................13 Pre-harvest Planning ............................................................................................... 13 Streamside Management Zones .............................................................................. 14 Felling & Skidding Techniques ................................................................................ 19 Landings, Log Decks & Sets ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • La. Hwy. 22 Bridge Construction and Drainage Improvements
    REGIONAL RETENTION/DETENTION PROJECTS AND NATURAL FLOOD MANAGEMENT STATE PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS Louisiana Highway 22 Bridge Construction and Drainage Improvements PROGRAM DESCRIPTION In 2020, the Louisiana Watershed Initiative’s five coordinating state agencies selected 15 projects to receive $163 million in federal funding. The projects were selected because they align with the missions of these agencies and the long-term resilience objectives of LWI. Specifically, the projects will reduce flood risk in communities throughout the state, store floodwaters in ways that enhance natural habitats and move people in flood-prone areas out of harm’s way. As the granting agency of these funds, the Louisiana Office of Community Development reviewed the projects to ensure they meet HUD requirements and align with the state’s $1.2 billion CDBG-MIT Action Plan. PROJECT DESCRIPTION La. Hwy. 22 functions as a barrier impeding natural hydrology in the Amite River floodplain. The highway prevents the natural flow of water into the adjacent McElroy Swamp, increases surface elevation in the river and exacerbates area flood risk. The La. Hwy. 22 Bridge Construction and Drainage Improvements project includes the construction of two bridge structures and the excavation of two drainage basins for the purpose of improving local hydrology, reducing area flood risk and restoring the McElroy Swamp. COST ESTIMATE $ 41.7 million Aerial view of La. Hwy. 22 where project improvements will be implemented to reduce flood risk upstream of the highway and restore natrual hydrology downstream of the highway. PROJECT DURATION PLAN CONSISTENCY LOUISIANA CDBG-MIT MASTER ACTION PLAN (2020) Planning/Engineering Complete The project is consistent with the Louisiana CDBG- and Design MIT Master Action Plan’s focus on implementing “state-identified regional retention/detention, natural flood management and infrastructure projects.” OCD Construction/ TBD identifies flood control projects as unmet mitigation Implementation needs.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\TEMP\Copy of HB656
    ENROLLED Regular Session, 2012 ACT No. 588 HOUSE BILL NO. 656 BY REPRESENTATIVE DOVE 1 AN ACT 2 To amend and reenact R.S. 49:214.24(C) and (D) and 214.34(A)(introductory paragraph), 3 (1), and (5) and (B) and to enact R.S. 49:214.34(C), relative to the coastal zone 4 boundary; to redraw the coastal zone boundary; to provide relative to determination 5 of fastlands within the coastal zone; to provide relative to required coastal use 6 permits within the coastal zone; and to provide for related matters. 7 Be it enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana: 8 Section 1. R.S. 49:214.24(C) and (D) and 214.34(A)(introductory paragraph), (1), 9 and (5) and (B) are hereby amended and reenacted and R.S. 49:214.34(C) is hereby enacted 10 to read as follows: 11 §214.24. Coastal zone boundary 12 * * * 13 C. The inland boundary of the coastal zone shall generally be a line 14 beginning at the intersection of the northern line of the Intracoastal Canal and the 15 Louisiana/Texas boundary, thence proceeding easterly along the northern bank of the 16 Intracoastal Canal to Highway 82, thence northeasterly along Highway 82 to 17 Highway 690, thence easterly along Highway 690 to Highway 330, thence 18 northeasterly along Highway 330 to Highway 14, thence easterly along Highway 14 19 to Highway 90, thence southeasterly along Highway 90 to Highway 85, thence 20 northeasterly along Highway 85 to Highway 90, thence easterly along Highway 90 21 to the intersection of Highway 90 and the East Atchafalaya Basin Protection Levee Page 1 of 11 CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored are additions.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\TEMP\Copy of 14RS
    Foil Lopinto Williams, P. OFFICIAL JOURNAL Franklin Lorusso Willmott Garofalo Mack Woodruff OF THE Total - 102 HOUSE OF The Speaker announced that there were 102 members present and a quorum. REPRESENTATIVES Prayer OF THE Prayer was offered by Dr. Samuel Jones. STATE OF LOUISIANA Pledge of Allegiance Rep. Cromer led the House in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance THIRTY-FOURTH DAY'S PROCEEDINGS to the Flag of the United States of America. Reading of the Journal Fortieth Regular Session of the Legislature On motion of Rep. Hill, the reading of the Journal was Under the Adoption of the dispensed with. Constitution of 1974 On motion of Rep. Hill, the Journal of May 6, 2014, was adopted. House of Representatives State Capitol Petitions, Memorials, and Baton Rouge, Louisiana Communications The following petitions, memorials, and communications were Wednesday, May 7, 2014 received and read: The House of Representatives was called to order at 2:00 P.M., by the Honorable Chuck Kleckley, Speaker of the House of Message from the Senate Representatives. HOUSE BILLS Morning Hour May 7, 2014 ROLL CALL To the Honorable Speaker and Members of the House of Representatives: The roll being called, the following members answered to their names: I am directed to inform your honorable body that the Senate has finally passed the following House Bills: PRESENT House Bill No. 38 Mr. Speaker Geymann Miller Returned with amendments Abramson Gisclair Montoucet Adams Greene Moreno House Bill No. 106 Anders Guillory Morris, Jay Returned with amendments Armes Guinn Morris, Jim Arnold Harris Norton House Bill No. 144 Badon Harrison Ortego Returned without amendments Barras Havard Pearson Barrow Hazel Pierre House Bill No.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey of Livingston Parish, Louisiana
    United States In cooperation with Department of Louisiana Agricultural Agriculture Experiment Station Soil Conservation Service Parish, Louisiana Summary of Tables Temperature and precipitation (table 1) ..................................110 Freeze dates in spring and fall (table 2). .................................11 1 Probability. Temperature. Growing season (table 3). ..............................................11 1 Suitability and limitations of map units on the general soil map for major land uses (table 4) ..................................................1 12 Percent of area. Cultivated crops. Pasture. Woodland. Urban uses. Intensive recreation uses. Acreage and proportionate extent of the soils (table 5) .................... 116 Acres. Percent. Prime farmland (table 6). ............................................... 117 Land capability classes and yields per acre of crops and pasture (table 7). .. 118 Land capability. Corn. Soybeans. Common bermudagrass. Improved bermudagrass. Bahiagrass. Woodland management and productivity (table 8). ........................ 120 Ordination symbol. Management concerns. Potential productivity. Trees to plant. Recreational development (table 9). .....................................124 Camp areas. Picnic areas. Playgrounds. Paths and trails. Golf fairways. Wildlife habitat (table 10) ...............................................127 Potential for habitat elements. Potential as habitat for- Openland wildlife, Woodland wildlife, Wetland wildlife. Building site development (table 11) .....................................129
    [Show full text]
  • Acts of 2021 Legislature
    dwelling. The lessor may withhold the lessee’s security deposit only for any reason permitted under R.S. 9:3251. If the lessee or an additional lessee is ACTS OF 2021 a sexual assault offender named on reasonable documentation presented to the lessor, the lessor shall be entitled to an immediate eviction of the sexual assault offender upon presenting the court with reasonable documentation of the assault. LEGISLATURE (3) When there are multiple lessees who are parties to a lease agreement for which the accommodation of early termination is requested by one or more lessees, and upon the lessee’s timely providing to the lessor reasonable documentation of the sexual assault as required in this Section, the entire lease shall terminate on the mutually agreed-upon date, and the lessor Acts 1-92 shall be entitled to an immediate eviction of all lessees upon presenting the court with reasonable documentation of the sexual assault. If the lessee or ACT No. 1 an additional lessee is a sexual assault offender named on the reasonable - - - documentation presented to the lessor, then the lessor shall be entitled to an HOUSE BILL NO. 375 immediate eviction of the sexual assault offender upon presenting the court BY REPRESENTATIVES FREEMAN, ADAMS, BRYANT, BUTLER, with reasonable documentation of the assault. Lessors shall be immune from CARPENTER, GARY CARTER, CORMIER, COX, ECHOLS, GLOVER, any and all lawsuits, claims, demands, or causes of action filed by or on behalf GREEN, HORTON, HUGHES, JEFFERSON, JENKINS, LANDRY, of lessees. LARVADAIN, MARCELLE, MOORE, NEWELL, PHELPS, WHITE, AND D. A certification of sexual assault form as provided by this Section shall WILLARD AND SENATORS BARROW, CLOUD, CORTEZ, FIELDS, FOIL, read substantially the same as follows: HENRY, HEWITT, JACKSON, LUNEAU, ROBERT MILLS, MIZELL, “(Name of qualified third party and, if applicable, the name of their sexual PEACOCK, AND PETERSON assault center, office, or agency) AN ACT I have suffered sexual assault as defined in La.
    [Show full text]
  • Auctions Two Sales • Two Consecutive Days
    AUCTIONS TWO SALES • TWO CONSECUTIVE DAYS Sealed Bid Inspections SALE #1: PART 1 OFF-SITE SEALED BID SALE OF by Appointment Only if Prior to GO-KART PRODUCT LINE Tuesday, May 11 PART 2 OFF-SITE AUCTION OF GO-KART WEDNESDAY MAY 12 MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT 10:00 A.M. OFF-SITE Color Slide Auction Will Take Place at: INSPECTION: COLOR SLIDE AMITE COMMUNITY CENTER Tuesday, May 11 EQUIPMENT AUCTION 101 West Chestnut 9:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. NITROUS AMITE, LOUISIANA 70422 Assets may be inspected at (See Directions on Page 6) 13060 East Pond Street GO-KARTS Roseland, Louisiana 70456 A 10% BUYER’S PREMIUM WILL APPLY < > PARTIAL PEDRAZZOLI VIEW OF BEND MASTER 42 2001 FINISHED 5-AXIS CNC PRODUCT TUBE BENDER CNC INVENTORY SALE #2: At the premises of THURSDAY INDUSTRIAL MACHINE SPECIALISTS, INC. MAY 13 INSPECTION: 6230 Louisiana Highway 70 10:00 A.M. Tuesday & Wednesday, May 11 & 12 9:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. SORRENTO (Baton Rouge Area), LOUISIANA 70778 A 10% BUYER’S & Morning of Sale (See Directions on Page 11) PREMIUM WILL APPLY 1999 1998 < DAEWOO DMV500 CNC VERTICAL CNC MACHINING CNC CENTER DAEWOO PUMA MDL. 250L CNC LATHE Read Terms and Conditions on Back Page of Brochure Sale Conducted By: Headquarters: 2901 W. Sam Houston Pkwy. N., Suite A-130 PLANT & MACHINERY INC. Houston, TX 77043 AUCTIONEERS•APPRAISERS•LIQUIDATORS•REAL ESTATE PHONE: (713) 691-4401 FAX: (713) 672-7905 Bob Braman LA #1099-04 E-MAIL: [email protected] Ron Moore LA #851-04 WEBSITE: www.pmi-auction.com SEALED BID PART 1 OFF-SITE SEALED BID SALE OF THE PRODUCT LINE COMPLETE HIGH PERFORMANCE
    [Show full text]
  • December 1, 1998
    December 1, 1998 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE PARISH OF ASCENSION, DONALDSONVILLE, LOUISIANA DECEMBER 1, 1998 The Council of the Parish of Ascension met this day in Special Session in the Council Meeting Room, Courthouse East, Gonzales, Louisiana, 6:00 p.m., with Chairman Thomas Pearce presiding. The following members were present: Joseph Pierre Dudley Brown Milton Vicknair Jerry Savoy Thomas Pearce Todd Lambert Jeffrey Poche Darnell Martinez The following members were absent: Alvin Thomas Marvin Braud Gilbert Buratt Council Jeffrey Poche offered the prayer and led the pledge to the flag by all present. Parish President Tommy Martinez was not present. Chairman Thomas Pearce stated the purpose of the special meeting of the Council was consideration to adopt the Ascension Parish Land Use Plan and Development Code (Zoning Ordinance) and at that time opened the floor to the Council for discussion of said ordinance. Councilman Jeffrey Poche stated to the Council the changes before them were proposed at the special meeting on November 3, 1998. Moved by Jeffrey Poche, seconded by Todd Lambert and unanimously adopted, to recommend the following change to the Ascension Parish Land Use Plan (Page 17): Section 3.0 Land Use Definitions To pursue these principles, the Land Use Plan uses the following set of land use concepts. High Intensity Commercial and Residential Development Definition--This district includes residential development of not more than eight units per acre and commercial developments of a minimum lot of 43,560 square feet and commercial developments on a minimum lot of 16,000 square feet. Moved by Jeffrey Poche, seconded by Todd Lambert and unanimously adopted, to recommend the following change to the Ascension Parish Land Use Plan (Page 18): High Intensity Residential District Definition--This district allows residential densities of eight dwelling units per acre and commercial development of 1,500 square feet on a minimum lot of 10,000 square feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Livingston Parish Council Livingston, Louisiana
    Minutes of the Livingston Parish Council Livingston, Louisiana February 7, 2019 The Livingston Parish Council met in regular session duly called, advertised, and convened at its regular meeting place, the Parish Council Chambers, Governmental Building, 20355 Government Boulevard, Livingston, Louisiana, on Thursday, February 7, 2019, at the hour of six-thirty (6:30) p.m. with the following Livingston Parish Council members present: Jeff Ard John Wascom Tracy Girlinghouse Garry “Frog” Talbert R.C. “Bubba” Harris Tab Lobell Maurice “Scooter” Keen Jeff Averett Shane Mack Absent: Layton Ricks, Parish President Christopher Moody, Parish Legal Counsel Also present: Jennifer Meyers, representing in the absence of the Parish President Al Giraud, representing in the absence of Mr. Christopher Moody, Parish Legal Counsel ------------------------------------------------- The chair asked the public to please mute or turn off their cell phones. ------------------------------------------------- The chair announced that Public Input would be accepted from any member of the audience wishing to address an agenda item. ------------------------------------------------ The chair addressed agenda item 7, “Presentations:”. Having no Presentations, the chair moved to agenda item number 8: “Adopt a resolution to authorize the Parish President to sign a Memorandum of Understanding between the Livingston Parish Council, the Louisiana Department of State, the Office of the Secretary of State, The Livingston Parish Registrar of Voters, The Livingston Parish Clerk of Court to add an additional early voting location at the Denham Springs Library location – Jason Harris, Livingston Parish Clerk of Court and Giovanni Tairov, Livingston Parish Library Director” The chair invited Mr. Harris and Mr. Tairov to come from their places in the audience to the front and address the Councilmembers to explain the resolution that was needed to add a second early voting location site in Livingston Parish.
    [Show full text]
  • REMEMBER! REPENT! BELIEVE! Guidance for Ash Wednesday and Our Call to Conversion He Penitential Character “Give Up” a Sense of Normalcy My Gratitude to Every Our Time
    THE CATHOLIC CFebruary 12,ommentator 2021 Vol. 59, No. 1 2020 LPA NEWSPAPER OF THE YEAR thecatholiccommentator.org REMEMBER! REPENT! BELIEVE! Guidance for Ash Wednesday and our call to conversion he penitential character “give up” a sense of normalcy my gratitude to every our time. Our first Lenten of what we observe for nearly a year without any pastor and parishioner for liturgy is Ash Wednesday, so Tas church during the indication the pandemic would working together to meet I give this instruction for our Lenten season has surely been soon be over. the challenges of this past gatherings. magnified during the past Most notable this past year year. Unfortunately, we are The Congregation for year! was our inability to gather still in need of vigilance to Divine Worship and the Beginning in March 2020, for the Easter Triduum to slow the spread of this virus. Discipline of the Sacraments Lent was quickly interrupted celebrate the foundational and But unlike last year we are published guidance on Jan. by a total lockdown. The life-giving memorials of the better prepared so we WILL 12 regarding the distribution faithful were unable to institution of the Eucharist observe and celebrate the of ashes on Ash Wednesday. worship in person as we and the passion, death and liturgies of Lent, Holy Week “The priest should first From the Bishop are usually accustomed. resurrection of our Lord Jesus and Easter this year even address all those present, Bishop Michael G. Duca Individually and collectively, Christ. if our gatherings will still and he only says the formula we were forced to literally Allow me again to express need to reflect the realities of SEE BISHOP PAGE 13 Dominican Friars announce withdrawal By Richard Meek The Catholic Commentator The Dominican Friars are leaving Holy Ghost Church and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Helen R. Dietrich, Inc
    2.IL££JLJiLJlJLJiG.jL o f the LOUISIANA WILD LIFE AND FISHERIES COMMISSION BOARD MEETING Tuesday, July 27, 1971 10:00 o'clock a.m. Wild Life & Fisheries Bldg 400 Royal Street New Orleans, Louisiana f@©e©) Helen R. Dietrich, inc. 333 ST. CHARLES AVENUE. SUITE 1221 NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70130 • (504) 524-4787 2 P_R.O_C_E_E_^_XN_^GS_ „ „ . The Board Meeting of the Louisiana Wild Life and Fisheries Commission convened at 10:00 o'clock a .m . on Tuesday, July 27, 1971, at the Wild Life and Fisheries Building, 400 Royal Strdet, New Orleans, Louisiana, Mr. H . G. Wright, Vice-Chairman, presiding. PRESENT WERE: H. C . Wright, Vice-Chairman C. M. Hoffpauer, Director C. A. Guidry J. E. Kyle, Jr. HoB son Norris J, L. Walker J „ L . Win fre e A_ _G _E _N _D A. LYLE S . ST-. AMANT : l/L, Request By LaTerre Co., Inc., for (4) renewal of permit to remove fill material from Lake Boudreaux. ^%^^Request By Berry Bros. General -(5 5 HHLtN R. DIETRICH, INC., the complete convention service in new Orleans 3 to dredge sand and/or fill material from S ix Mile Lake. Request for Bait fishermen to shrimp, with special permits, in closed season. Request for permit to dredge fill material from Grand Lake in vicinity of Cypress Island. R. K. YANCEY: <-^5^// / Recommen dat ions of 19 71-72 _wa t e r fowl season. TED O'NEIL: "Discuss Bill (H.R. 8784 of the 92 nd Congress) to prohiBit the use of steel jaw traps in the United States and Europe.
    [Show full text]