DOCSLIB.ORG

Ockham Prologue.Pages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ockham Prologue.Pages Page !1 This translation of the Prologue of the Ordinatio of the Venerable Inceptor, William of Ockham, is partial and in progress. The prologue and the first distinction of book one of the Ordinatio fill volume one of the critical edition of the Latin text of Ockham’s theological works edited by the Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure, NY. These translations are works in progress and may contain infelicities or errors or (through oversight) omissions. Apologies in advance, therefore, and requests that readers who notice such faults would communicate them to the translator for his information and correction. The paragraph numbers are my own additions for ease of reference. The numbers in bold italics inside {} brackets that are embedded within the text indicate, for reference purposes, what the relevant volume and page number of the Latin critical edition is at that point, so {1.4} means volume 1 page 4 of that edition. These numbers are not in italics when they are referred back to or forward to elsewhere in the text. The headings and subheadings are in the text of the critical edition. Peter L.P. Simpson September, 2021 Page !2 THE ORDINATIO OF THE VENERABLE INCEPTOR, WILLIAM OF OCKHAM Prologue Question 1: Whether it is Possible for the intellect of the Wayfarer to (page 5) have Evident Knowledge of the Truths of Theology [Opening Arguments] Num. 1 Exposition of the Terms of the Question Num. 6 Objections against the Last Affirmation Num. 12 Response to the Objections Num. 16 About the Meaning of the Question Num. 29 Division of the Question Num. 30 Article One: Preparatory Distinctions about Intuitive and Abstractive Knowledge of the Same Thing Num. 31 Preparatory Conclusions: First Conclusion Num. 35 Objections against the First Conclusion Num. 36 Response to the Objections Num. 39 Second Conclusion Num. 43 Third Conclusion Num. 44 Proof of the First Conclusion First Reason Num. 45 Objection to the First Reason Num. 48 Response to the Objection Num. 50 Second Reason for the First Conclusion Num. 55 Exposition of the First Article Num. 58 Conclusions Inferred from the First Article against the Opinion of Scotus Num. 64 Opinion of the Author about the Difference between Intuitive and Abstractive Knowledge Num. 76 Corollary I: Intuitive Knowledge of a non-existent Thing is Possible Num. 77 Corollary II: There is Intuitive Knowledge of Things Purely Intelligible Num. 80 The Second Corollary is Confirmed by the Authority of Scotus Num. 89 Articles Two to Four: About Intuitive and Abstractive Knowledge with Respect to the Deity Num. 95 Article Five: Response to the Form of the Question Num. 98 Article Six: Ten Doubts about the Question Num. 104 Page !3 Solution to the Doubts Num. 119 Response to the Principal (Opening) Arguments Num. 158 Question 2: Whether Evident Knowledge of the Truths of Theology is (page 39) Science Properly Speaking [Opening Arguments] Num. 1 Article One: What Proposition is Knowable by Science Properly Speaking Num. 9 Objections to the Second and Third Condition Num. 15 Response to the Objections Num. 20 Article Two: What is Science? Num. 37 Objections against the Last Condition Num. 41 Solution of the Objections Num. 43 Article Three: Diverse Opinions First Opinion Num. 63 Opinion of Scotus Num. 69 Against the Opinion of Scotus Num. 78 Ockham’s own Solution Num. 96 Conclusions Inferred from the Above Num. 100 Doubts about the Aforesaid Num. 124 Response to the Arguments of the Subtle Doctor Num. 127 Solution to the Doubts Num. 148 Response to the Arguments of the First Opinion Num. 151 Response to the Opening Arguments Num. 154 Question 3: Whether a Property Knowable of Something by Science (page 65) Properly Speaking Differ from it Really [Opening Arguments] Num. 1 Opinion of John of Reading Num. 5 Against the Opinion of John of Reading Num. 8 Solution of the Author Num. 14 Response to the Arguments of John of Reading Num. 22 Response to the Principal Argument Num. 36 Question 4: Whether Every Property is Demonstrable a Priori of its (page 72) First Subject [Opening Arguments] Num. 1 Distinction of Properties Num. 6 Which Properties are Demonstrable First Conclusion Num. 7 Second Conclusion Num. 15 Third Conclusion Num. 21 Fourth Conclusion Num. 22 Page !4 Objections Num. 25 Response to the Objections Num. 30 Response to the Principal Argument Num. 43 Question 5: Whether in Every Demonstration a Definition is the Middle (page 79) Term for the Demonstrating [Opening Arguments] Num. 1 Opinion of Richard of Conington Num. 7 Attack on the Opinion of Richard of Conington Num. 15 The Author’s own Response Num. 23 Refutation of the Arguments of Richard of Conington Num. 28 Opinion of the Author about Formal Definition Num. 34 Response to the Principal Argument Num. 44 Question 6: Whether only a Proposition per se in the Second Mode of (page 88) Speaking is per se Knowable by Science Properly Speaking [Opening Arguments] Num. 1 What Proposition is Per Se in the Second Mode Num. 6 What sort of Proposition is Demonstrable Num. 15 Response to the Principal Argument Num. 18 Question 7: Whether the Theology that of Common Law is Possessed (page 91) by Theologians is a Science Properly Speaking [Opening Arguments] Num. 1 Opinions that Hold the Affirmative Side Num. 7 Rejection of these Opinions in General Num. 18 Against the Same Opinions in Particular Num. 23 Opinions that Hold the Negative Side Num. 34 Ockham’s Opinion Num. 36 Opinion of Peter Aureol about the Theological Habit Num. 38 Rejection of Peter Aureol’s Opinion Num. 43 Ockham’s Opinion about the Theological Habit Num. 46 Response to the Arguments for the Other Opinions Num. 55 Response to the Opening Arguments Num. 76 Question 8: Whether the Habit of Theology is Really One in Number (page 103) [Opening Arguments] Num. 1 Opinion of St. Thomas [Aquinas] Num. 8 Attack on the Opinion of St. Thomas Num. 9 Opinion of Henry of Ghent Num. 18 Against the Opinion of Henry of Ghent Num. 23 The Author’s own Response Num. 38 Doubts about the Aforesaid Num. 46 Page !5 Solution of the Doubts Num. 50 Response to the Reasons of Henry of Ghent Num. 63 Response to the Opening Arguments Num. 68 Question 9: Whether God under the Proper Idea of Deity is the Subject (Page 114) of Theology [Opening Arguments] Num. 1 The Opinion of Scotus about the Idea of the First Subject Num. 10 Attack on Scotus’ Opinion about the Idea of the First Subject Num. 14 The Author’s Own Opinion Num. 54 Conceptual Knowledge of One Thing does not Cause Conceptual Knowledge of another Thing Num. 55 The Subject does not always Contain the Property Virtually Num. 63 What is Required for Knowledge of a Proposition? Num. 64 What belongs to the Idea of the First Subject? Num. 66 Objections against the Aforesaid Num. 78 Solution of the Doubts Num. 88 Response to the Reasons of Scotus Num. 107 The Author’s Opinion about the Subject of Theology Num. 118 Preliminary Distinctions Num. 119 Response to the Form of the Question Num. 126 Concordance of the Various Opinions Num. 133 Response to the Principal Arguments Num. 142 Question 10: Whether only the Operation of the Sensitive Power is (Page 140) Action [Opening Arguments] Num. 1 Opinion of Robert Cowton Num. 7 Attack on the Opinion of Robert Cowton Num. 13 Opinion of Scotus Num. 15 Attack on the Opinion of Scotus Num. 19 Ockham’s own Opinion about Action Num. 34 Solution of the Question Num. 41 Distinction between Practical and Deliberative Intellect Num. 42 Which Operation is Action in the More Strict Sense? Num, 44 Which Operation is Action in the Most Strict Sense Num. 50 Response to the Arguments of Robert Cowton Num. 53 Response to the Reasonings of Scotus Num. 64 Question 11: Whether Practical and Speculative Knowledge are (Page 153) Distinguished by Ends or by Objects [Opening Arguments] Num. 1 Opinion Page !6 Page !7 Prologue {1.3} Question 1: Whether it is Possible for the intellect of the Wayfarer to have Evident Knowledge of the Truths of Theology 1. Concerning the prologue I ask first whether it is possible for the intellect of the wayfarer to have evident knowledge of the truths of theology. 2. That it is not: Because evident knowledge of the truths of theology cannot be had without a distinct knowledge of the deity under the proper idea of deity; but a distinct knowledge of the deity is impossible for the intellect of the wayfarer; therefore impossible for it too is evident knowledge of the truths of theology. Proof of the major: because indistinct knowledge of the deity does not suffice, because if it did, since it would be possible for us from our pure natural powers, the consequence would be that we could from our pure natural powers have evident knowledge of the truths of theology, which is manifestly false; therefore for evident knowledge of the truths of theology {1.4} there is required a distinct knowledge of the deity. The minor is plain: because knowledge of the deity under the proper idea of deity, since it is of the infinite and beatific object under the idea of beatific, is itself beatific; but beatific knowledge is impossible for the intellect of the wayfarer; therefore etc. 3. Second as follows: if the intellect of the wayfarer had evident knowledge of the truths of theology, those truths would either be known per se or would be known by other things that are more known to it. Not in the first way because the truths would be known when the terms are known; but such propositions, which are per se known, are known by everyone who apprehends the terms, and so they would be naturally known to anyone who apprehends the terms, which is manifestly false.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Medieval Western Philosophy: the European Emergence
    Cultural Heritage and Contemporary Change Series I, Culture and Values, Volume 9 History of Western Philosophy by George F. McLean and Patrick J. Aspell Medieval Western Philosophy: The European Emergence By Patrick J. Aspell The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy 1 Copyright © 1999 by The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy Gibbons Hall B-20 620 Michigan Avenue, NE Washington, D.C. 20064 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Aspell, Patrick, J. Medieval western philosophy: the European emergence / Patrick J. Aspell. p.cm. — (Cultural heritage and contemporary change. Series I. Culture and values ; vol. 9) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Philosophy, Medieval. I. Title. III. Series. B721.A87 1997 97-20069 320.9171’7’090495—dc21 CIP ISBN 1-56518-094-1 (pbk.) 2 Table of Contents Chronology of Events and Persons Significant in and beyond the History of Medieval Europe Preface xiii Part One: The Origins of Medieval Philosophy 1 Chapter I. Augustine: The Lover of Truth 5 Chapter II. Universals According to Boethius, Peter Abelard, and Other Dialecticians 57 Chapter III. Christian Neoplatoists: John Scotus Erigena and Anselm of Canterbury 73 Part Two: The Maturity of Medieval Philosophy Chronology 97 Chapter IV. Bonaventure: Philosopher of the Exemplar 101 Chapter V. Thomas Aquinas: Philosopher of the Existential Act 155 Part Three: Critical Reflection And Reconstruction 237 Chapter VI. John Duns Scotus: Metaphysician of Essence 243 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • John Duns Scotus, Philosopher
    John Duns Scotus, Philosopher Proceedings of "The Quadruple Congress" on John Duns Scotus von Mary B Ingham, Oleg V Bychkov 1. Auflage John Duns Scotus, Philosopher – Ingham / Bychkov schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei beck-shop.de DIE FACHBUCHHANDLUNG Thematische Gliederung: Christliche Philosophie Aschendorff Verlag Münster 2010 Verlag C.H. Beck im Internet: www.beck.de ISBN 978 3 402 10213 8 Archa Verbi Subsidia, Vol. 3 Archa Verbi Yearbook for the Study of Medieval Theology Subsidia 3 Mary Beth Ingham and Oleg Bychkov (Eds) John Duns Scotus, Philosopher Proceedings of “The Quadruple Congress” on John Duns Scotus Part 1 Franciscan Institute Publications Archa Verbi Annuarium Societatis Internationalis pro Studiis Theologiae Medii Aevi promovendis Annuaire de la Société Internationale pour l‘Étude de la Théologie Médiévale Annuario della Società Internazionale per lo Studio della Teologia Medievale Anuario de la Sociedad Internacional para los Estudios de la Teología Medieval Jahrbuch der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Theologische Mediävistik Yearbook of the International Society for the Study of Medieval Theology Subsidia curator Riccardo Quinto Pavel Blažek Ursula Vones-Liebenstein directorium Societatis Volker Leppin praeses Societatis Bibliografi sche Information der Deutschen Bibliothek: Die Deutsche Bibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografi e; detailliert bibliografi sche Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.ddb.de abrufbar. Library of Congress Control Number: 2010925581 Cover illustration:
    [Show full text]
  • Conceiving the Word: Patristic and Early Medieval Sources for Franciscan Discussion of Mary's Active Motherhood James Rodger Bell
    Marian Studies Volume 52 The Marian Dimension of Christian Article 9 Spirituality, Historical Perspectives, I. The Early Period 2001 Conceiving the Word: Patristic and Early Medieval Sources for Franciscan Discussion of Mary's Active Motherhood James Rodger Bell Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/marian_studies Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Bell, James Rodger (2001) "Conceiving the Word: Patristic and Early Medieval Sources for Franciscan Discussion of Mary's Active Motherhood," Marian Studies: Vol. 52, Article 9. Available at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/marian_studies/vol52/iss1/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Marian Library Publications at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marian Studies by an authorized editor of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Bell: Conceiving the Word Conceiving the Word CONCEIVING THE WORD: PATRISTIC AND EARLY MEDIEVAL SOURCES FOR FRANCISCAN DISCUS~ SIONS OF MARY'S ACTIVE MOTHERHOOD ]ames Roger Bell, Ph.D.* The key texts for understanding the changing nature of medi~ eval academic discussion and instruction in the thirteenth century are the Commentaries on Peter Lombard's Book of Sentences. In Book III, questions concerning the incarnation of Christ were examined by generation after generation of scholars. The changing nature of the tabulae of questions mirrors the shifting interest of scholarly dis, cussion. A significant phenomenon in the thirteenth century was the gradual intrusion of questions about Mary into Christological discussions on the Incarnation. This can be strikingly illustrated by comparing the tabula of questions of the Dominican Robert of Kilwardby (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract of Monia Mancinelli's Work (RAMUS
    Abstract of Monia Mancinelli’s work (RAMUS PhD - curriculum FITMU, XXIX cicle – XV o. s.) Title: “The Principle of Individuation in Landulph Caracciolus’s commentary on the Sentences. Text and study”. This research is aimed at reconstructing and studying the sections of Landulph Caracciolus’s commentary on the Sentences dedicated to the principle of individuation. Landulph Caracciolus is a Franciscan friar coming from Naples who lived in the XIVth century and who lectured the Sentences at Paris in the academic year 1318-1319. Recently, Christopher D. Schabel has underlined that, despite its widespread popularity and the important context of its composition, however, Landulph’s commentary on the Sentences has largely been neglected. From 1999 Christopher D. Schabel and Russell L. Friedman have been promoting a larger attention to Landulph’s commentary, showing that the Franciscan friar can be an interesting mean to trace the story of the reception of Duns Scotus and Peter Auriol’s doctrines at the University of Paris during the first twenty years of the XIVth century. The question of the principle of the individuation is about the research of the existence and the identification of the element responsible for both ontological determination and knowledge of the single entity. The first chapter of this work shows that the question explodes during the XIIIth century thanks to the Aristotelian corpus and to Avicenna’s and Averroes’s works, and many thinkers try to offer a personal solution to the problem, offering six main competing theories: 1) real natures are individual as such (William of Ware); 2) double negation (Henry of Ghent); 3) actual existence (maybe Roger Bacon, Peter of Falco, Peter of Alverny or Robert Kilwardby); 4) the collection of personal accidents/properties (ascribed to Boethius), and particularly quantity (Godfrey of Fontaines and Thomas Sutton); 5) matter (Albert the Great, Thomas of Aquin and Giles of Rome); 6) respectus ad agens (unknown).
    [Show full text]
  • The Franciscans in Hertfordshire. a Note in Commemoration : 1224—1924
    The Franciscans in Hertfordshire. A Note in Commemoration : 1224—1924. BY GERALD R. OWST, M.A., PH.D. "IN the year of the Lord 1224, in the time of the Lord Pope Honorius, in the same year, that is, in which the Rule of the blessed Francis was by him con- firmed, and in the eighth year of the Lord King Henry, son of John, on the Tuesday after the feast of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin, which that year fell upon a Sunday, the Friars Minor first arrived in England, land- ing at Dover. They were four clerics and five lay- brethren."1 Thus opens brother Thomas of Eccleston's narrative " Of the coming of the Friars Minor [or Franciscans] into England,' compiled probably about forty years after that first landing. At recent celebrations of the seventh hundred anniversary of the event, Eccles- ton's picturesque account of the heroic pioneers pressing on to Canterbury, from thence to London, and so even- tually to Oxford and other important towns, has been re-told. There is no need to linger, therefore, about those first guest-houses on the road, around the school- house fire at Canterbury, or the kitchen fire at Salisbury, where ill-fed and weary friars made merry over the wretched beer-dregs, or in the little cells erected in Corn- hill with their lining of dried grass. When did the brethren first reach Hertfordshire in days of extreme poverty, simplicity and holy joy? We do not know. Something more than mere chance would seem to have marked out St.
    [Show full text]
  • Theological Knowledge" in Gregory of Rimini and His Fourteenth-Century Context
    Between Faith and Knowledge: "Theological Knowledge" in Gregory of Rimini and his Fourteenth-Century Context Author: Jeffrey Charles Witt Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/2622 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2012 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of Philosophy BETWEEN FAITH AND KNOWLEDGE: “THEOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE” IN GREGORY OF RIMINI AND HIS FOURTEENTH-CENTURY CONTEXT a dissertation by JEFFREY C. WITT submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May, 2012 © copyright by JEFFREY CHARLES WITT 2012 Abstract BETWEEN FAITH AND SCIENCE: GREGORY OF RIMINI ON THEOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE IN HIS FOURTEENTH-CENTURY CONTEXT By Jeffrey C. Witt Directed by Jean-Luc Solère The professional theologian attempts to distinguish herself by claiming some kind of “epistemic advance” over the person of mere belief. This claim to knowledge—and the relation of this knowledge to the other sciences—can therefore be subject to philosophical analysis. What is the subject matter of this discipline? What is the method by which it secures its results? And how does its practitioner “know” when she has passed beyond mere belief? The theologians of the high and late Middle Ages faced a unique historical challenge. At this time, “theology” first emerged as a distinct academic discipline, and the theological doctors were perpetually engaged in a debate about the exact nature of theology. On the one hand, they were eager to assert that theology made a real epistemic contribution that should be respected by the other sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Stephen D
    CURRICULUM VITAE Stephen D. Dumont May 17, 2019 E DUCATION B.A. Philosophy and English, Wabash College (May, 1974; Phi Beta Kappa) M.A. Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto (December, 1976) M.S.L. (Licentiate in Mediaeval Studies) Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, University of Toronto (October, 1979) Ph.D. Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto (Conferred February, 1983) Thesis: Henry of Ghent and John Duns Scotus on the Existence of God. Supervisor: Armand A. Maurer A REA OF RESEARCH Medieval philosophy and theology A CADEMIC A PPOINTMENTS 2007-2010: Chairperson, Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame 2006- Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame 2001-2006: Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame 1995-2001: Joint Appointment, Associate Professor, Centre for Medieval Studies and Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto 1988-1995: Senior Fellow, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies and Associate Professor, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto 1985-1988: Junior Fellow, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies and Assistant Professor, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto 1982-1985: Assistant Professor, School of Philosophy, Catholic University of America 1981-1982: Instructor, School of Philosophy, Catholic University of America S CHOLARSHIPS AND F ELLOWSHIPS 1980-1981: Ontario Graduate Scholarship, University of Toronto 1978-1980: College Fellowship, Trinity College, University of Toronto 1977-1980: Open Fellowships, University of Toronto G RANTS • Grant from Office of the Vice-President for Research ($70,000) to continue work on Critical Edition of John Duns Scotus, Reportationes Parisienses. Co-PI with Kent Emery. • Summer Research Institute at Harris Manchester College, Oxford University, June, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Franciscan Quodlibeta in Southern Studia and at Paris (1280-1300) Sylvain Piron
    Franciscan Quodlibeta in Southern Studia and at Paris (1280-1300) Sylvain Piron To cite this version: Sylvain Piron. Franciscan Quodlibeta in Southern Studia and at Paris (1280-1300). Chris Schabel. Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages. The Thirteenth Century, Brill, pp.403-438, 2006. halshs- 00088978 HAL Id: halshs-00088978 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00088978 Submitted on 8 Aug 2006 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. FRANCISCAN QUODLIBETA IN SOUTHERN STUDIA AND AT PARIS , 1280-1300 Sylvain Piron (in Chris Schabel dir., Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages. The Thirteenth Century , Brill, 2006) The classic definition of the quodlibetal dispute gave much importance to its localisation within the Paris theology faculty. Indeed, this is where the exercise was first invented and where it was most consistently practiced. This restrictive definition, nevertheless, has created some confusion. For instance, Palémon Glorieux wondered whether quodlibeta disputed by scholars who never became masters of theology at Paris could rightfully deserve such a qualification. 1 One author who especially came under suspicion is Peter John Olivi – while the true nature of William of Ockham’s Quodlibeta was never really questioned, probably because of the very different status the Venerabilis Inceptor was granted later in the history of philosophy and theology.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Bibliography on the Ontology of John Duns Scotus
    Selected Bibliography on the Ontology of John Duns Scotus https://www.ontology.co/biblio/duns-scotus-biblio.htm Theory and History of Ontology by Raul Corazzon | e-mail: [email protected] Selected Bibliography on the Ontology of John Duns Scotus BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. De Doctrina Ioannis Duns Scoti. Vol. Ii: Problemata Philosophica. 1968. Roma: Commissionis Scotisticae. Acta Congressus Scotistici Internationalis Oxonii et Edimburgi 11-17 sept. 1966 celebrati. 2. "John Duns Scotus." 1993. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly no. 67. Special issue on John Duns Scotus. Table of contents: Allan B. Wolter, O.F.M.: Reflections on the life and works of Scotus pp. 1-36; Francis J. Catania: John Duns Scotus on Ens Infinitum pp. 37-54; Ansgar Santogrossi, O.S.B.: Duns Scotus on potency opposed to act in Questions on the Metaphysics, IX pp. 55-76; Martin M. Tweedale: Duns Scotus's doctrine on Universals and the Aphrodisian tradition pp. 77-94; Allan B. Wolter, O.F.M.: Scotus on the divine origin of possibility pp. 95-108; John Boler: Transcending the natural: Duns Scotus on the two affection of the will pp. 109-126; Mary Elizabeth Ingham, C.S.J.: Scotus and moral order pp. 127-140 3. Aertsen, Jan. 1998. "Being and One: The Doctrine of the Convertible Transcendentals in Duns Scotus." Franciscan Studies no. 56:47-64. 4. Alanen, Lilli. 1985. "Descartes, Duns Scotus and Ockham on Omnipotence and Possibility." Franciscan Studies no. 45:157-188. 5. Andrews, Robert. 2003. "The Modistae and John Duns Scotus's Questiones Super Perihermeneias." In Aristotle's Peri Hermeneias in the Latin Middle Ages Essays on the Commentary Tradition, edited by Braakhuis, Henk A.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century Studien Und Texte Zur Geistesgeschichte Des Mittelalters
    Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters Begründet von Josef Koch Weitergeführt von Paul Wilpert, Albert Zimmermann und Jan A. Aertsen Herausgegeben von Andreas Speer In Zusammenarbeit mit Tzotcho Boiadjiev, Kent Emery, Jr. und Wouter Goris BAND 102 Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century Edited by Stephen F. Brown, Th omas Dewender and Th eo Kobusch LEIDEN • BOSTON 2009 Th is book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Philosophical debates at Paris in the early fourteenth century / edited by Stephen F. Brown, Th omas Dewender & Th eo Kobusch. p. cm. — (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, ISSN 0169-8028 ; v. 102) Papers originally delivered at conferences in Bonn and Boston. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-90-04-17566-2 (hbk. : alk. paper) 1. Paris (France)—Intellectual life— Congresses. 2. Paris (France)—Intellectual life—Sources—Congresses. 3. Université de Paris—History—Congresses. 4. Philosophy, Medieval—Congresses. 5. Th eology—History—To 1500—Congresses. I. Brown, Stephen F. II. Dewender, Th omas. III. Kobusch, Th eo. IV. Title. V. Series. DC725.P48 2009 189—dc22 2009007301 ISSN 0169-8028 ISBN 978 90 04 17566 2 Copyright 2009 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, Th e Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography on the Ontological Argument: Medieval Authors
    Bibliography on the Ontological Argument: Medieval Authors https://www.bibliographia.co/ontological-proof-medieval-biblio.htm Bibliographia. Annotated bibliographies by Raul Corazzon | e-mail: [email protected] Selected Bibliography on the History of the Ontological Argument from Anselm of Canterbury to Duns Scotus Legenda: P = Pro (accept the proof); C = Contra (rejected the proof); I = indifferent (take no position on the proof); ca. = circa; fl = flourished; d. died. References are to the most important works where ontological argument is discussed. P Anselm of Canterbury [Anselmus Cantuariensis, Doctor Angelicus] C Gaunilo of Marmoutiers [Gaunilo, monachus] P William of Auxerre [Guillelmi Altissiodorensis] P Alexander of Hales [Alexander Halensis, Doctor Irrefragabilis] P Richard Fishacre [Richardus Flamesburensis] C Richard Rufus of Cornwall [Richaruds Rufus Cornubiensis] P Bonaventure of Bagnorea [Bonaventurae, Johannes Fidanza, Doctor Seraphicus] I Albert the Great [Albertus Magnus, Doctor Universalis] C Thomas Aquinas [Thomae Aquinatis, Doctor Angelicus] I Peter of Tarentaise [Petrus a Tarentasia, Pope Innocent V] P John Peckham [Johannis Packham, Doctor Ingeniosus] I Henry of Ghent [Henrici de Gandavo, Doctor Solemnis] P Nicolaus of Ockham [Nicolaus de Ockham] P Matthew of Aquasparta [Matthaei ab Aquasparta] 1 di 40 09/02/2019, 12:34 Bibliography on the Ontological Argument: Medieval Authors https://www.bibliographia.co/ontological-proof-medieval-biblio.htm P Giles of Rome [Aegidius Romanus, Egidio Colonna] C Richard of Middletown [Richardus of Mediavilla] P William of Ware [Gulielmi Guarae] P John Duns Scotus [Johannes Duns Scotus, Doctor Subtilis] Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109) Texts and translations The standard critical edition of Anselm's works is the Opera omnia prepared by Fr.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctrines and Debates
    King’s Research Portal Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Schumacher, L. A. (2020). Early Franciscan Theology: Doctrines and Debates. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 04.
    [Show full text]