DOCSLIB.ORG

[2]; Container 53

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
[2]; Container 53 12/2/77 [2] Folder Citation: Collection: Office of Staff Secretary; Series: Presidential Files; Folder: 12/2/77 [2]; Container 53 To See Complete Finding Aid: http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/library/findingaids/Staff_Secretary.pdf •,. - ~. ? ' , .. WITHDRAWAL SHE,ET (PR.ESIDEiNTIAL U,BRAFUEM· FORM OF DOCUMENT · cqRRESP.ONDENTS Ofl TITlE ·, memo From Press. to The President~· ('15. pp.) re·:·M-X .12/2/77'' ,. 'Vl/att. Weapons System . - 0 r 'I .I . .. :~~~ ~( ~~ 3.!1ftc. 0 '~ t,< ·'" FILE LOCATION .• , . Carter Pr.esidential Papers- Statf .. Offices,. O;f~iG:e·. of. the Sta;ff ·sec.-· Pres. H'and.... writing File 12·/2,/77. [2l BOX: 62 ·.• 1" RESTRICTION CODES (A)· Closed by Executive Order 12356'governing access.to national security information. f. (~) Closed by statute or by the ager:~cy which originated the doct~ment. · (C) piosed jn accordance with restrictions contain'ed in the donor:s deed of gift. · ~ " ,, / . NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDQ A'DMINISTRA TJON.. · '· o',' ;N'A. F·dR,M 1429 ··<e+ss> • .....' n~d ~~t-ii~I r,los ? LAM,c..J. ~ 4-~d /O/,/ EXECUTWE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY WASHINGTON. D.C. 20500 INFOEMA.TION Becember 2, 1977 MEMORANDUM FOR: THE PRESIDENT --- FROM: FRANK PRESS lf' SUBJECT: M-X Weapons System .As you requested, I have been get.ting more involved in some of the military technology issues.. I discussed this with Zbig, and he suggested that a vulnerability analysis of the M-X and cruise missile_systems would be useful. Subsequently, I convened·a panel of university and industrial exper·ts for this purpose. I have attached the Executive Summary of the panel's report on the M-X and will send you a separate memorandum concerning our cruise missile analysis next week. The panel examined the comparative vulnerability of the trench-based M.,-X system to the silo-based Minuteman and came up with several interesting conclusions: The threat to Minuteman is not so imminent or certain that commitment to an alternative system must be mad'e in FY 1979. Minuteman will remain a significant survivable component of the US deterrent throughout most of the 1980s until the Soviets succeed in developing and deploying warheads of greatly improved accuracy. Due to its complexity, small area of deployment, and technical aspects of the trench design., the M-X trench system has potential vulnerabilities which require further \ assessment and considerable uncerta1nty remains in assessments of its survivability. In addition to novel basing systems, other less costly options for enhancing survivability of Minuteman including \ relatively simple defensive measures should be more fully explored. On the basis of these conclusions, commitment to full-scale development of the M--X trench mobile system as proposed in the FY 1979 defense budget request ($260 M) appears premature. I ·- ... 2 recognize that there may be overriding political consider.ations, such as the impac·t on the domestic SALT debate and international perceptions of US resolve, which in your Judgment could necessitate support for the Defense proposal. However, on the technical merits of the issue, I would recommend that you defer full-scale development and subs·tantially reduce funding for M-X in the FY 1979 budget, at least down to the level of effort provided in FY 1978 (about $150M). The Panel also noted that a decision to develop a ne~ missile can and should be made on considerations that are separable from those of maintaining ICBM survivability. These include the impact on cris·is stability, concerns about aging of the M·inuteman force, .targe.ting requirements and political perceptions. The panel confined itself to vulnerability analysis for its initial effort, but if you think it would be useful, we will examine this broader issue as well. .,0'!!! Gl '"'I"US .., CD 0 C/) (/) (i) ~ .., Q) < ~ ............, o·-· -· 0 0 0 ::J"C "'0'< E;~ 'COc. Q) ~ a> (/) SECRE'f'- . ·.. ~ .• Report of the OSTP Vulnerability Panel on The M-X Missile System EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. The proposed M-X weapons system includes a missile which is larger, more accurate and carries more warheads than Minuteman III, and a mobile basing system to make the missile more survivable. The proposed M-X funding plan for FY 79 allocates about $200 M to missile development. This can be viewed as a conunitment to the development of a substantially more capable missile. A decision to develop a new missile can and should be. made on considerations that are for the most part separable from those of providing a new basing system to maintain ICBM survivability. II. The vulnerability of Minuteman has properly been a matter of continuing concern, and it is not too soon to pursue alternatives to Minuteman silo-basing. However, the threat to the Minuteman is not so imminen,t or certain that cotmllitment to the development of a specific al.ternative system must be made now. III. Minuteman will remain a significant survivable component of the US deterrent throughout most of the 1980s, that is, until the Soviets succeed in developing and deploying an adequate number of warheads of greatly improved accuracy Such accuracy can be achieved either in a new generation of Sovie,t missiles, or by an upgrade in .accuracy beyond that now projected in Soviet sys;tems presently deployed. We are basing this conclusion on evaluation of the destructive interaction among attacking warheads (i.e., fratricide), which makes two-on-one attacks very difficult for purposes other than to increase system launch reliability. SECRET 2 IV. Conceptually, the trench-based M-X system has advantages in survivability over Minuteman III against attacks of very high accuracy. However, an assessment of its survivability can only be demonstrated through calculation and certain· limited tes,ts. Considering the complexity of the system, considerable uncertainty will remain in such assessments. Surviv?bility of the M-X relies on secrecy of location of the missile. If by technical or intelligence means the attacker can de.termine, even approximately, the location of the missile within the trench, the the M;...X system survivability would be severely compromised. Whereas the vulnerability of Minuteman is particularly sensitive to achievement of high accuracies, as noted above., the M-X is vulnerable to attack by large numbers of less accurate Rvs·. M-X is based on a much .smaller land area than is Minuteman. Therefore, the M-X trench-based system is considerably more susceptible to "pin-down" under protracted nuclear missile attack than is Minuteman III. The vulne·rability of M-X to pin-down, in combination with a possible shoot-look-shoot attack on M-X requires further assessment. V. In addition to. novel basing systems, less costly options, such as defensive measures, for enhancing survivability of existing Minuteman silos should be more fully explored, recognizing that the de.fended area. need be only a few hundred meters across, thereby ailowing the use o.f relatively simple protection measures. VULNERABILITY I>ANEL MEMBERS Sol Buchsbaum * Bell Laboratories John Deutch M.I.T . ** . Richard Garwin IBM Marvin Goldberger Princeton University John Marcum OSTP W. K. Panofsky Stanford Linear Accele~ator Center Jack Ruina M. I. T. Bud Wheelon Hughes Aircraft * Chair:man ** Now with Department of Energy THE OSTP VULNERABILITY Pfu."lEL' S fu.'JALYSIS OF THE ~I-X SYSTEH I. Gener~l Consideration for Follo-:;-o:-:-: Land-Based S~1 ·s~2::. The .Sc•'Jiet Union a:;;:;:;ears to be de'rslJping ano-::!',er ge::era tion of land-based missiles beyond tio·se no·.·, depl oysd. If this :1e•:.' ge:.eration leads to substantially improved accurac;'/ ::.::d is deplo~red e:·:t;:::c,sively, the survivability of the I.'linu-::enan force. would :,e threatened. ::Ii:~uter:J.an survivability woald also be threatened b;:." asigni:ficav-:. upgracis in accuracy in systems presently deployed ( SS-17, 18 and 19) "!:'eyond . that ',_ now proJected. As a counter to this perceived threat, as· o:1ell as to increase US hard-target strike capability, the US Air Force presently is focusing its efforts on the :M-X program as a follow-on to the ::Jinuteman. The M-X contemplates both a new missile with increased throvl-\':eight, increased accuracy and increased number of warheads, together with a new type of a mobile basing system. Consideration of alternate basing schemes continues to be intertwined with the need :for a missile of highly improved performance. We believe this is unfortunate and, in fact, cou....Ylterproductive. The questions of a new generation of missiles of enhanced performance and of alternate basing systems are technically separable at the present stage of the program. On the one hand, tne present Minuteman silos could accommodate cold-launched missile systems •:lith new payloads of throw-weight larger by as much as a factor of 4 than that of Minuteman III (i.e., larger than the SS-19 throw-weight). Conversely, the alternate basing sys·tems designed to decrease vulnerability against Soviet attack could be developed (and at lower cost) to accorrunodate l\11\tl-III or other missiles considerably smaller than those under consideration for ::VI-X. Development and deployment of a ne•.-: missile system delivering greatly increased throw-weight and explosive.yield, irrespective ,of its basing, would greatly enhance the perception of a hard silo counterf'orce threat against the opponent and therefore raises ::!ajor issues. lunong these are: (a) adequacy of the nuclear stock;lile ar~d possible nee.d for reactivation of production facilities for special nuclee.r materials; (b) problems of 4 .. fiECRE!. strategic instabili t:.' induced by Soviet perception of vulnerabili ~"'./ of their hard silos '.7hic!: ::!Urr~!ltly· conts.i::; a:bo'-.1"': 75 perr.~ent '.:If their (c) the ri.s:: of ir:creased ecll:1ter"l~ d2..::-:age should such a high-yield missile force be usei even again2t counterforce ~argets; (d) SALT considera tion.3.; and (e) the high cost of the new missile.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The University of Chicago Old Elites Under Communism: Soviet Rule in Leninobod a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Di
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO OLD ELITES UNDER COMMUNISM: SOVIET RULE IN LENINOBOD A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY FLORA J. ROBERTS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS JUNE 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures .................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ vi A Note on Transliteration .................................................................................................. ix Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter One. Noble Allies of the Revolution: Classroom to Battleground (1916-1922) . 43 Chapter Two. Class Warfare: the Old Boi Network Challenged (1925-1930) ............... 105 Chapter Three. The Culture of Cotton Farms (1930s-1960s) ......................................... 170 Chapter Four. Purging the Elite: Politics and Lineage (1933-38) .................................. 224 Chapter Five. City on Paper: Writing Tajik in Stalinobod (1930-38) ............................ 282 Chapter Six. Islam and the Asilzodagon: Wartime and Postwar Leninobod .................. 352 Chapter Seven. The
    [Show full text]
  • Living with Death: the Humanity in Leo Tolstoy's Prose Dr. Patricia A. Burak Yuri Pavlov
    Living with Death: The Humanity in Leo Tolstoy’s Prose A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Renée Crown University Honors Program at Syracuse University Liam Owens Candidate for Bachelor of Science in Biology and Renée Crown University Honors Spring 2020 Honors Thesis in Your Major Thesis Advisor: _______________________ Dr. Patricia A. Burak Thesis Reader: _______________________ Yuri Pavlov Honors Director: _______________________ Dr. Danielle Smith, Director Abstract What do we fear so uniquely as our own death? Of what do we know less than the afterlife? Leo Tolstoy was quoted saying: “We can only know that we know nothing. And that is the highest degree of human wisdom.” Knowing nothing completely contradicts the essence of human nature. Although having noted the importance of this unknowing, using the venture of creative fiction, Tolstoy pined ceaselessly for an understanding of the experience of dying. Tolstoy was afraid of death; to him it was an entity which loomed. I believe his early involvements in war, as well as the death of his brother Dmitry, and the demise of his self-imaged major character Prince Andrei Bolkonsky, whom he tirelessly wrote and rewrote—where he dove into the supposed psyche of a dying man—took a toll on the author. Tolstoy took the plight of ending his character’s life seriously, and attempted to do so by upholding his chief concern: the truth. But how can we, as living, breathing human beings, know the truth of death? There is no truth we know of it other than its existence, and this alone is cause enough to scare us into debilitating fits and ungrounded speculation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Pages
    About This Volume Brett Cooke We continue to be surprised by how the extremely rewarding world WKDW/HR7ROVWR\FUHDWHGLVDG\QDPLFVWLOOJURZLQJRQH:KHQWKH Russian writer sat down in 1863 to begin what became War and PeaceKHXWLOL]HGSRUWUDLWVRIfamily members, as well as images RIKLPVHOILQZKDWDW¿UVWFRQVWLWXWHGDOLJKWO\¿FWLRQDOL]HGfamily chronicle; he evidently used the exercise to consider how he and the SUHVHQWVWDWHRIKLVFRXQWU\FDPHWREH7KLVLQYROYHGDUHWKLQNLQJRI KRZKLVSDUHQWV¶JHQHUDWLRQZLWKVWRRGWKH)UHQFKLQYDVLRQRI slightly more than a half century prior, both militarily and culturally. Of course, one thinks about many things in the course of six highly FUHDWLYH \HDUV DQG KLV WH[W UHÀHFWV PDQ\ RI WKHVH LQWHUHVWV +LV words are over determined in that a single scene or even image typically serves several themes as he simultaneously pondered the Napoleonic Era, the present day in Russia, his family, and himself, DVZHOODVPXFKHOVH6HOIGHYHORSPHQWEHLQJWKH¿UVWRUGHUIRUDQ\ VHULRXVDUWLVWZHVHHDQWLFLSDWLRQVRIWKHSURWHDQFKDOOHQJHV7ROVWR\ posed to the contemporary world decades after War and Peace in terms of religion, political systems, and, especially, moral behavior. In other words, he grew in stature. As the initial reception of the QRYHO VKRZV 7ROVWR\ UHVSRQGHG WR WKH FRQVWHUQDWLRQ RI LWV ¿UVW readers by increasing the dynamism of its form and considerably DXJPHQWLQJLWVLQWHOOHFWXDODPELWLRQV,QKLVKDQGV¿FWLRQEHFDPH emboldened to question the structure of our universe and expand our sense of our own nature. We are all much the richer spiritually for his achievement. One of the happy accidents of literary history is that War and Peace and Fyodor 'RVWRHYVN\¶VCrime and PunishmentZHUH¿UVW published in the same literary periodical, The Russian Messenger. )XUWKHUPRUHDV-DQHW7XFNHUH[SODLQVERWKQRYHOVH[SUHVVFRQFHUQ whether Russia should continue to conform its culture to West (XURSHDQ PRGHOV VLPXOWDQHRXVO\ VHL]LQJ RQ WKH VDPH ¿JXUH vii Napoleon Bonaparte, in one case leading a literal invasion of the country, in the other inspiring a premeditated murder.
    [Show full text]
  • Tolstoy in Prerevolutionary Russian Criticism
    Tolstoy in Prerevolutionary Russian Criticism BORIS SOROKIN TOLSTOY in Prerevolutionary Russian Criticism PUBLISHED BY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS FOR MIAMI UNIVERSITY Copyright ® 1979 by Miami University All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Sorokin, Boris, 1922­ Tolstoy in prerevolutionary Russian criticism. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Tolstoi, Lev Nikolaevich, graf, 1828-1910—Criticism and interpretation—History. 2. Criticism—Russia. I. Title. PG3409.5.S6 891.7'3'3 78-31289 ISBN 0-8142-0295-0 Contents Preface vii 1/ Tolstoy and His Critics: The Intellectual Climate 3 2/ The Early Radical Critics 37 3/ The Slavophile and Organic Critics 71 4/ The Aesthetic Critics 149 5/ The Narodnik Critics 169 6/ The Symbolist Critics 209 7/ The Marxist Critics 235 Conclusion 281 Notes 291 Bibliography 313 Index 325 PREFACE Leo Tolstoy (1828-1910) has been described as the most momen­ tous phenomenon of Russian life during the nineteenth century.1 Indeed, in his own day, and for about a generation afterward, he was an extraordinarily influential writer. During the last part of his life, his towering personality dominated the intellectual climate of Russia and the world to an unprecedented degree. His work, moreover, continues to be studied and admired. His views on art, literature, morals, politics, and life have never ceased to influence writers and thinkers all over the world. Such interest over the years has produced an immense quantity of books and articles about Tolstoy, his ideas, and his work. In Russia alone their number exceeded ten thousand some time ago (more than 5,500 items were published in the Soviet Union between 1917 and 1957) and con­ tinues to rise.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cold, White Light: the Defamiliarizing Power of Death in Tolstoy‟S War and Peace Jessica Ginocchio a Thesis Submitted To
    A Cold, White Light: The Defamiliarizing Power of Death in Tolstoy‟s War and Peace Jessica Ginocchio A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of the Arts in the Department of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures (Russian). Chapel Hill 2013 Approved by: Christopher Putney Radislav Lapushin Hana Pichova Abstract JESSICA GINOCCHIO: A Cold, White Light: The Defamiliarizing Power of Death in Lev Tolstoy‟s War and Peace (Under the direction of Christopher Putney) In this thesis, I examine the theme of death in War and Peace by Lev Tolstoy. Death in War and Peace causes changes in characters‟ perception of their own lives, spurring them to live “better.” Tolstoy is widely understood to embed moral lessons in his novels, and, even in his early work, Tolstoy presents an ideal of the right way to live one‟s life. I posit several components of this Tolstoyan ideal from War and Peace and demonstrate that death leads characters toward this “right way” through an analysis of the role of death in the transformations of four major characters—Nikolai, Marya, Andrei, and Pierre. ii Table of Contents Chapter: I. Introduction…………………………………………………………………..1 II. Death in Tolstoy……………………………………………………………....5 III. The Right Way……………………………………………………………….14 IV. War and Peace………………………………………………………………..20 a. Nikolai Rostov ……………………………………………...…………...23 b. Marya Bolkonskaya……………………………………………...………27 c. Andrei Bolkonsky…………………………………………………….….30 d. Pierre Bezukhov………………………………………………………….41 V. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………...53 REFERENCES………………………………………………………………………56 iii Chapter I Introduction American philosopher William James identified Tolstoy as a “sick soul,” a designation he based on Tolstoy‟s obsession with death (James, 120-149).
    [Show full text]
  • Leo Tolstoy's Sevastopol Stories
    2008.072008.07.0.0.0.02222 Classics Revisited: Leo TolstoyTolstoy’’’’ss Sevastopol Stories bybyby Walter G. Moss Eastern Michigan University With the following essay, the Review launches a new series entitled “Classics Revi- sited.” Its goal will be to provide thoughtful reconsiderations of masterpieces in the literature of war. Both literary and purely historical works will be included. The in- augural appreciation is by Walter G. Moss, professor of history at Eastern Michigan University. Professor Moss, who has taught Russian history, philosophy, and litera- ture for many years, is the author of numerous articles and distinguished books within and beyond those subject areas, including A History of Russia , 2 vols. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997; 2 nd ed. London: Anthem, 2002/5), Russia in the Age of Alexander II, Tolstoy, and Dostoyevsky (London: Anthem, 2002), An Age of Progress? Clashing Twentieth-Century Global Forces (London: Anthem, 2008), and, with R.D. Goff, J. Terry, J-H. Upshur, and M. Schroeder, The Twentieth Century and Beyond: A Global History , 7 th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007). — Ed. In April 1855, in the midst of the Crimean War, a twenty-six year old Russian sub- lieutenant, Leo Tolstoy, was commanding an artillery battery in the besieged Black Sea city of Sevastopol. 1 His unit was in the most forward bastion of the defense. It was close to the French lines and under constant and heavy bombardment. Occasionally while at the front, in a bomb-proof dugout with the sounds of cannons booming in his ears, he wrote a story about the siege of the city at the end of the previous year--he had first entered Sevastopol in November and subsequently moved back and forth from the front.
    [Show full text]
  • War and Peace
    WAR AND PEACE Instructor: Prof. Ingrid Kleespies Email: [email protected] Office Hours: T, W 2:00-3:00pm & by appt. Office: 328 Pugh Hall Vasily Vereshchagin, "Return from the Petrov Palace," 1895 Course Description From the battlefield to the ballroom, Tolstoy's epic novel of life in Russia at the beginning of the nineteenth century is a profound meditation on the causes of war, the nature of social relationships, the poles of human suffering and love, and, perhaps most importantly, the nature and meaning of history itself. In this course we will read War and Peace closely in its entirety. We will examine the origins of the novel in Tolstoy's early writing and consider the historical, political, and social contexts, both of the events described (the Napoleonic Wars) and the period fifty years later in which Tolstoy wrote War and Peace. We will address some of the following questions: Is War and Peace a novel? How does Tolstoy's obsession with the theme of history shape the text on a variety of levels? What do various adaptations of the novel tell us about its reception at different historical moments? Finally, how might War and Peace be relevant to our own moment in history? General Education Objectives This course will provide students with an opportunity to explore the interrelationship between literature, art, and national identity. In so doing, it is designed to fulfill General Education distribution requirements in the categories of “Humanities” (H) and “International” (N). The content of the course draws students’ attention to the values, attitudes, and norms that shape Russian culture (N).
    [Show full text]
  • The Spiritual and the Physical — Tolstoy's 'Noumenal'
    VEDA’S JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOELL) Vol.4 Issue 1 An International Peer Reviewed Journal 2017 http://www.joell.in RESEARCH ARTICLE THE SPIRITUAL AND THE PHYSICAL — TOLSTOY’S ‘NOUMENAL’ AND ‘PHENOMENAL’ CONCEPTS Ferdinand B. Lyngdoh (Assistant Professor, College of Home Science, Central Agricultural University, Tura – 794005 Meghalaya.) ABSTRACT This paper is an attempt to trace Tolstoy’s philosophy and belief pertaining to the physical and the spiritual notions or his noumenal and phenomenal concepts. He was an ardent admirer of Christian standpoint and he held some radical views which are perhaps analogous to Immanuel Kant’s. Some profound iconoclastic views on sex and marriage, on love, and his ascetic affinity towards Buddhist teachings can also be traced in some of his works. Keywords: Tolstoy’s philosophy, Immanuel Kant, noumenal and phenomenal concepts. Citation: APA Lyngdoh,F.B. (2017) The Spiritual and The Physical — Tolstoy’s ‘Noumenal’ and ‘Phenomenal’ Concepts.Veda’s Journal of English Language and Literature- JOELL, 4(1), 85-89. MLA Lyngdoh, Ferdinand B. “The Spiritual and The Physical — Tolstoy’s ‘Noumenal’ and ‘Phenomenal’ Concepts.”Veda’s Journal of English Language and Literature- JOELL 4.1(2017): 85-89. © Copyright VEDA Publication Count Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy (1828- account that is based upon his experiences in the 1910), famously known as Leo Tolstoy, was a Russian Crimean War as he enlisted in 1852. author who is regarded as one of the greatest writers Tolstoy underwent a sort of crisis in the 1870s. of all time. Tolstoy is best known for his novels War According to Donna Tussing Orwin, “Tolstoy’s and Peace (1869) and Anna Karenina (1877).
    [Show full text]
  • Truth Is a Potato: a Journey Into Tolstoy's Resurrection
    Global Insight ISSN 2690-8204 Volume 1 • 2020 doi:10.32855/globalinsight.2020.005 Truth Is a Potato: A Journey into Tolstoy’s Resurrection Ryan Adam The over-intellectualization of the questions of Truth and Justice only muddy the challenge of living correctly and alienate us from actual, practicable answers, answers which have been here, Leo Tolstoy argues, for millennia. Tolstoy, through the character of Prince Nekhlyudov in Resurrection, opposes simplicity and hard-scrabble peasant wisdom to the labyrinths and mountains of intellectualism and state-sanctioned correctness. This article explores Tolstoy’s ideas regarding the nature and substance of Truth, pursing them through the author’s biog- raphy as well as the experiences of the Prince. It concludes that, for any flaws in his reasoning, his beliefs still offer a viable solution to the complex, minute, and numerous doubts which surround any debate in our modern, data-ridden world. The evils of the world are monstrous as well as minute: the moment you point one out, reveal it standing there, distinctly horrible, you will see its edges bleed into the circumstances surrounding it and the obvious blackness of its substance blend irrevocably among the tints of regular life. A murder in broad daylight should leave no doubt, but the obviousness of that too may seep away on closer examination. So where do we locate the boundaries of guilt? Where, so to speak, on such a blended landscape, should we build a prison’s walls? The devil’s crimson tail is twisted up among the chains of circumstance, the causal links of which dangle into the invisible deep, so much so that if I steal something from you, how correct is it to say that I’m the criminal, only me, and never mind the miasma of influences I grew up in? These questions animate the thoughts and anxieties of Prince Nekhlyudov, the hero of Leo Tolstoy’s late novel, Resurrection.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah's Diss Revised
    UNNERVING IMAGES: CINEMATIC REPRESENTATIONS OF ANIMAL SLAUGHTER AND THE ETHICS OF SHOCK by Sarah Jane O’Brien A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of The Centre for Comparative Literature University of Toronto © Copyright by Sarah Jane O’Brien (2012) —Abstract— UNNERVING IMAGES: CINEMATIC REPRESENTATIONS OF ANIMAL SLAUGHTER AND THE ETHICS OF SHOCK Sarah Jane O’Brien Doctor of Philosophy, 2012 The Centre for Comparative Literature University of Toronto This dissertation forges critical connections between the industrial logic of cutting up animals to make meat and cinematic techniques of cutting up indexical images of animals to create spectacle. I begin by identifying the cinematic attraction of violent animal death. In Chapter One, I argue that social and material conditions prevent cinema from representing real (i.e., unsimulated) human death, and the medium in turn relies on animal bodies to register visible evidence of death. I contend that this displacement does not yield the definitive knowledge of death that it promises; reviewing scenes of animal death, we acquire no real knowledge of the “fact” of death, but rather approach an understanding that we share death—finitude, vulnerability, suffering—with animals. Cinema’s ethical potential rests on its singular capacity to lay bare this shared susceptibility, and I thus shift my attention to evaluating how seminal scenes of animal slaughter and fundamental techniques of film form fulfil or fail this ethical potential. I begin my wide-ranging analysis by identifying and critiquing, in Chapter Two, the methods of exposure that currently dominate cinematic representations of slaughter.
    [Show full text]
  • On Insanity. Written in 1910 the Year of Tolstoy's Death and Now Published
    On Insanity Leo Tolstoy 1910 translated by Ludvig Perno C.W. Daniel Co. Ltd., London, 1936 Source: Collection of the State Library of Victoria, Australia I In the course of many months, and particularly of late, I have been receiving daily two or three letters ftJ which young people, especially young ladies, write to me saying that they have 1ecided to do away with themselves. For some reason or other they refer to me, hoping that I, by some advice of mine, shall save them from this. These letters are of three different types. The first, the most common type, is either that of a village schoolmistress who for the sake of serving common people wishes to give up her occupation to go to college, obviously thinking that the standard of her education is not high enough to enlighten the common people, and she imagines her desire to be so strong and elevated that she has decided to do away with herself if ft cannot be realised; of an exalted youth threatening to commit suicide if nobody comes forward to help him to develop his, as he feels, wonderful talents; of an inventor wishing to confer a blessing on mankind; of a poet feeling himself to be a genius; of a young lady preferring to die if she is unable to go to college; of a woman who has fallen in love with the husband of somebody else; or of a man who has fallen in love with a married woman. The writers of these letters differ according to their sex, age, or social position, but they all have one thing in common, namely, the blind, crude egoism which blots out everything else for them except their own personality.
    [Show full text]
  • Views and Experiences from a Colonial Past to Their Unfamiliar New Surroundings
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Matthew David Smith Candidate for the Degree: Doctor of Philosophy ____________________________________________ Director Dr. Carla Gardina Pestana _____________________________________________ Reader Dr. Andrew R.L. Cayton _____________________________________________ Reader Dr. Mary Kupiec Cayton ____________________________________________ Reader Dr. Katharine Gillespie ____________________________________________ Dr. Peter Williams Graduate School Representative ABSTRACT "IN THE LAND OF CANAAN:" RELIGIOUS REVIVAL AND REPUBLICAN POLITICS IN EARLY KENTUCKY by Matthew Smith Against the tumult of the American Revolution, the first white settlers in the Ohio Valley imported their religious worldviews and experiences from a colonial past to their unfamiliar new surroundings. Within a generation, they witnessed the Great Revival (circa 1797-1805), a dramatic mass revelation of religion, converting thousands of worshipers to spiritual rebirth while transforming the region's cultural identity. This study focuses on the lives and careers of three prominent Kentucky settlers: Christian revivalists James McGready and Barton Warren Stone, and pioneering newspaper editor John Bradford. All three men occupy points on a religious spectrum, ranging from the secular public faith of civil religion, to the apocalyptic sectarianism of the Great Revival, yet they also overlap in unexpected ways. This study explores how the evangelicalism
    [Show full text]