Sustainable Groundwater Management: What We Can Learn

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sustainable Groundwater Management: What We Can Learn Sustainable Groundwater Management: What We Can Learn from California’s Central Valley Streams Reference This publication is a summary of detailed report: The Nature Conservancy. 2014. Groundwater and Stream Interaction in California’s Central Valley: Insights for Sustainable Groundwater Management. Available at: http://www.scienceforconservation.org/ Acknowledgements The full study was prepared by RMC for The Nature Conservancy The study was made possible by the generous support of the Water Foundation, an initiative of Resources Legacy Fund. Photo on cover: Seasonal vernal pools surface amidst lush grasslands and blue oak woodlands at Dye Creek Preserve, part of the Lassen Foothills project where restorative land management and conservation-compatible ranching techniques are administered by The Nature Conservancy on behalf of the state of California. © Ian Shive B SUSTAINABLE GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT: WHAT WE CAN LEARN FROM CALIFORNIA’S CENTRAL VALLEY STREAMS Across the Tulare Basin, San Joaquin Basin and Introduction Sacramento Valley these changes have differed in mag- roundwater is intimately connected to surface water, nitude, but share a similar trend. In areas with hydraulic Gwhich has profound implications for sustainable connection between groundwater and surface water, water resource management. California has historically increases in groundwater extraction continue to cause overlooked this important interaction and as a conse- declines in groundwater levels that reduce stream flow. quence, decisions about groundwater extractions have generally failed to address the resulting impacts to sur- Our report found that as groundwater production grew face flows and aquatic ecosystems such as rivers, threefold, surface water was seriously depleted in the wetlands and springs. This has contributed to a loss of Central Valley. This region, which accounts for 20 approximately 95 percent of the historical wetlands and percent of all groundwater pumping in the United river habitat in California’s Central Valley.1 States, has now lost nearly all of its wetlands and river habitat. Our modeled results indicate that over 80 With the passage of the Sustainable Groundwater percent of the valley’s rivers lose more water today Management Act (SGMA), groundwater sustainability than they did in their relatively natural state. By the agencies across the state will soon be required to end of our study period, the valley’s rivers were losing manage groundwater resources to avoid causing unde- almost 1.5 billion gallons of water each day—that is sirable results to groundwater levels and interconnected enough water to supply 2.5 times the water needs of groundwater and surface water. These groundwater Los Angeles. In addition, groundwater aquifers contain levels and areas of interconnection support ground- 6.5 trillion gallons less water now than they did at the water-dependent ecosystems2 (GDEs). Therefore, an start of the study period. important first step in sustainable groundwater man- agement is to understand how groundwater pumping The results of our study pre-date the extended drought impacts surface water, including streams, and GDEs. that began in 2011 and it is likely that the drought has To build the case for ecosystem protections now found exacerbated stream depletions. In addition, our study in SGMA, The Nature Conservancy completed a study illustrates that the effects of groundwater pumping in 2014 to illustrate how groundwater pumping is can take years—even decades—to recover. This means affecting streams and rivers in California’s Central that the full extent of the impacts of groundwater Valley. The report, entitled Groundwater and Stream pumping during the drought will continue to plague Interaction in California’s Central Valley: Insights for us for many years. 3 Sustainable Groundwater Management , uses an inte- These findings have troubling implications not only grated hydrologic model to reconstruct the historical for the health of our ecosystems, but also for the sur- impacts of groundwater use on groundwater levels face water right holders. If groundwater pumping and stream flow conditions. The results from that continues to increase, it will become even more chal- detailed study are summarized here. lenging to ensure that surface water is available for Our study focused on the state’s Central Valley the cities, industries, agriculture and plants and ani- because of its importance in California’s overall water mals that rely on surface water systems. supply. We used a model developed by the Department Sustainable groundwater management requires that of Water Resources (DWR) to simulate the Central we acknowledge the critical connection between Valley’s hydrologic conditions during the years from groundwater and surface water. In addition, in man- 1922 to 2009. aging this connection, we must acknowledge the protracted time period it can take for groundwater 1 The Bay Institute (1998) From the Sierra to the Sea: The Ecological History of the San Francisco–Bay Delta Watershed. extractions to impact stream flow. The best tools we 2 Groundwater dependent ecosystems are “terrestrial, aquatic and coastal have to sustain our important groundwater supplies ecosystems that require access to, replenishment or benefit from, or otherwise rely on subsurface stores of water to function or persist.” Howard and are to proactively manage and monitor groundwater Merrifield (2010) Mapping Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems in California. use and to invest heavily in groundwater recharge. PLoS ONE 5(6): e11249. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011249 Available at: http://www.scienceforconservation.org/ Implementation of SGMA provides the impetus to 3 The Nature Conservancy. 2014. Groundwater and Stream Interaction in change our approach and to integrate management California’s Central Valley: Insights for Sustainable Groundwater Management. Available at: www.scienceforconservation.org of groundwater and surface water. SUSTAINABLE GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT: WHAT WE CAN LEARN FROM CALIFORNIA’S CENTRAL VALLEY STREAMS 1 groundwater basins and sub-basins across California, Background the largest of which are the Sacramento Valley, San Joaquin Basin and Tulare Basin that underlie the The Interconnection between Groundwater and Central Valley. Stream Flow Streams and rivers in the Central Valley typically flow ost of California’s groundwater occurs in mate- over sediments that are connected to underlying aqui- rial deposited by streams, called alluvium. M fers. Because the sediments that make up the bottoms Alluvium consists of coarse deposits, such as sand of these stream channels are porous, water can flow and gravel, and finer-grained deposits such as clay back and forth between the streams and the under- and silt. The coarse and fine materials are usually lying aquifer. coalesced in thin lenses and beds that were deposited by streams. In this environment, coarse materials such A range of groundwater–surface water interconnec- as sand and gravel deposits usually provide the best tions are found in basins in the Central Valley. When source of water and are termed aquifers; the fin- groundwater levels in the surrounding sediments are er-grained clay and silt deposits are relatively poor high relative to the streams, groundwater flows from sources of water and are referred to as aquitards. the aquifer into the streams, contributing to the stream California’s groundwater basins usually include one flow. This condition is known as a gaining stream— or a series of alluvial aquifers with intermingled aqui- streams gain surface flows from high groundwater tards. DWR has delineated more than 500 alluvial levels. In some cases, this groundwater inflow keeps FIGURE 1: Groundwater and Stream Interaction in Alluvial Aquifers Groundwater basins in California are predominately alluvial or “valley-fill” groundwater aquifers. These aquifers are made up of unconsolidated or loosely-cemented sediments that have been deposited over long periods of time in valleys. These deposits, sometimes thousands of feet deep, are usually underlain by more solid, and less permeable, rocks that make up the geologic floor of the valley and the surrounding hills or mountains. The sediments that make up the valley-fill are deposited in interwoven layers and veins that vary widely in particle size, from cobbles and gravel, to sands, to clay. The water in these aquifers resides in, and moves through, the pore spaces between the sediment particles. Water moves more easily through sediments of larger particles, and moves very slowly, if at all, through sediments of finer particles, like clays. Gaining Stream—Where rivers or streams run across valley floors underlain by valley-fill aquifers, there will inevitably be exchange of water between the streams and the underlying and surrounding aquifers. If surrounding groundwater levels are higher than the water levels in the river, the river will “gain” water from the surrounding groundwater. This is called a “gaining” reach of stream. This groundwater inflow is often a large portion of the flow in streams after precipitation events have passed. This is often the natural Gaining Stream—Groundwater flows into the condition of streams, since streams are stream, increasing surface flows commonly the major discharge location for groundwater flow. Losing Stream—Pumping of groundwater draws down the groundwater levels near the pumping well, and multiple wells can lower groundwater levels over large regions of the aquifers. If groundwater levels are
Recommended publications
  • Karst Features — Where and What Are They?
    Karst Features — Where and What are They? This story was made with Esri's Story Map Journal. Read the interactive version on the web at https://arcg.is/jCmza. Iowa Geological and Water Survey Bureau completed a detailed mapping project of bedrock geologic units, key subsurface horizons, and surficial karst features in the Iowa portion of the Upper Iowa River Watershed in 2011. In the report, they note that “One of the primary goals of the study was to gain more thorough understanding of relationships between bedrock geology and karst features within the watershed.” Black River Falls photo courtesy of Larry Reis. Sinkholes Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, USGS, NGA, EPA, NPS According to the GIS data from the Iowa DNR, the UIR Watershed has 6,649 known sinkholes in the Iowa portion of the watershed. Although this number is very precise, sinkhole development is actually an active process in the UIR Watershed so the actual number of sinkholes changes over time as some are filled in through natural or human processes and others are formed. One of the most numerous karst features found in the UIR Watershed, sinkholes are formed when specific types of underlying bedrock are gradually dissolved, creating voids in the subsurface. When soils and other materials above these voids can no longer bridge the gap created in the bedrock, a collapse occurs. Photo Courtesy of USGS Sinkholes vary in size and shape and can and do occur in any type of land use in the UIR Watershed, from row crop to forest, and even in roads. According to the Iowa Geologic Survey, sinkholes are often connected to underground bedrock fractures and conduits, from minor fissures to enlarged caverns, which allow for rapid movement of water from sinkholes vertically and laterally through the subsurface.
    [Show full text]
  • “I Care for Počitelj”
    “I care for Počitelj” - “I care for Stolac” 07 – 15 July 2016 This unique medieval settlement, on the list to be declared a cultural heritage by UNESCO, is situated in the valley of the Neretva River, twenty five kilometers from Mostar, on the way to the Adriatic Sea. In the 1960s, Počitelj began to grow as an art center, promoted also by the famous writer - Nobel Prize winner Ivo Andrić. Počitelj, with its jumble of medieval stone buildings, ancient tower overlooking the river and proximity to the seaside, giving artists and will give you the peaceful and scenic place to work and stay. In the year 2000, the Government of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina initiated the Programme of the permanent protection of Počitelj. This includes protection of cultural heritage from deterioration, reconstruction of damaged and destroyed buildings, encouraging the return of the refugees and displaced persons to their homes as well as long-term preservation and revitalization of Počitelj historic urban area. The Programm is on-going. But a lot of maintenance services in public spaces and along the stone paths of the old town require voluntary action of few inhabitants. photo: Alberto Sartori Structure and Activities of the Camp Planned activities are: 1. “Active citizenship” actions: working activities in Počitelj and Stolac 2. Other events: public conference – sightseeing of surroundings 1. Active citizenship actions - working activities - Cleaning the environment around the old tower (citadel) and public areas in the old town of Počitelj, pruning
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water Introduction and Demonstration
    Ground Water Introduction and Demonstration Page Content By Kimberly Mullen, CPG http://www.ngwa.org/Fundamentals/teachers/Pages/Ground-Water-Introduction-and- Demonstration.aspx Objective Students will be able to define terms pertaining to groundwater such as permeability, porosity, unconfined aquifer, confined aquifer, drawdown, cone of depression, recharge rate, Darcy’s law, and artesian well. Students will be able to illustrate environmental problems facing groundwater, (such as chemical contamination, point source and nonpoint source contamination, sediment control, and overuse). Introduction Looking at satellite photographs of the planet Earth can illustrate the fact that the majority of the Earth’s surface is covered with water. Earth is known as the “Blue Planet.” Seventy-one percent of the Earth’s surface is covered with water. There also is water beneath the surface of the Earth. Yet, with all of the water present on Earth, water is still a finite source, cycling from one form to another. This cycle, known as the hydrologic cycle, is an important concept to help understand the water found on Earth. In addition to understanding the hydrologic cycle, you must understand the different places that water can be found—primarily above the ground (as surface water) and below the ground (as groundwater). Today, we will be starting to understand water below the ground. General definitions and discussion points “What is groundwater?” Groundwater is defined as water that is found beneath the water table under Earth’s surface. “Why is groundwater important?” Groundwater, makes up about 98 percent of all the usable fresh water on the planet, and it is about 60 times as plentiful as fresh water found in lakes and streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology of Harrison County, Indiana
    HYDROGEOLOGY OF HARRISON COUNTY, INDIANA BULLETIN 40 STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER 2006 HYDROGEOLOGY OF HARRISON COUNTY, INDIANA By Gerald A. Unterreiner STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER Bulletin 40 Printed by Authority of the State of Indiana Indianapolis, Indiana: 2006 CONTENTS Page Introduction................................................................................................................................ 1 Purpose and Background ........................................................................................................... 1 Climate....................................................................................................................................... 1 Physiography.............................................................................................................................. 4 Bedrock Geology ....................................................................................................................... 5 Bedrock Topography ................................................................................................................. 8 Surficial Geology....................................................................................................................... 8 Karst Hydrology and Springs..................................................................................................... 11 Hydrogeology and Ground Water Availability.........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Applicability of the Heat Pulse Method Toward the Determination of Infiltration Rates in Karst Losing-Stream Reaches
    T. Dogwiler, C.M. Wicks, and E. Jenzen – An assessment of the applicability of the heat pulse method toward the determination of infiltration rates in karst losing-stream reaches. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, v. 69, no. 2, p. 237–242. AN ASSESSMENT OF THE APPLICABILITY OF THE HEAT PULSE METHOD TOWARD THE DETERMINATION OF INFILTRATION RATES IN KARST LOSING-STREAM REACHES TOBY DOGWILER1,CAROL M. WICKS2, AND ETHAN JENZEN3 Abstract: Quantifying the rate at which water infiltrates through sediment-choked losing stream reaches into underlying karstic systems is problematic, yet critically important. Using the one-dimensional heat pulse method, we determined the rate at which water infiltrated vertically downward through an estimated 600 m by 2 m sediment-choked losing-stream reach in the Devil’s Icebox Karst System of Central Missouri. The 25 26 21 infiltration rate ranged from 4.9 3 10 to 1.9 3 10 ms , and the calculated discharge 22 23 3 21 through the reach ranged from 5.8 3 10 to 2.3 3 10 m s . The heat pulse-derived discharges for the losing reach bracketed the median discharge measured at the outlet to the karst system. Our accuracy was in part affected by significant precipitation in the karst basin during the study period that contributed flow to the outlet from recharge areas other than the investigated losing reach. Additionally, the results could be improved by future studies that deal with identifying areas of infiltration in losing reaches and how that area varies in relation to changing flow conditions. However, the heat pulse method appears useful in providing reasonable estimates of the rate of infiltration and discharge of water through sediment-choked losing reaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling of Solute Transport and Retention in Upper Amite River Hoonshin Jung Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2008 Modeling of solute transport and retention in Upper Amite River Hoonshin Jung Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Jung, Hoonshin, "Modeling of solute transport and retention in Upper Amite River" (2008). LSU Master's Theses. 2006. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2006 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MODELING OF SOLUTE TRANSPORT AND RETENTION IN UPPER AMITE RIVER A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering in The Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering by Hoonshin Jung B.S., Inha University, 1996 M.S., Inha University, 1998 December, 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to take this opportunity to express my deepest appreciation to Dr. Zhi-Qiang Deng, who is my graduate advisor and the chair on my committee. Dr. Deng has continuously supported and encouraged me throughout my graduate program. Most significantly, Dr. Deng has provided tremendous help upon development and completion of this master thesis. Again, his extensive help, support, and advice are highly recognized and appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeologic Characterization and Methods Used in the Investigation of Karst Hydrology
    Hydrogeologic Characterization and Methods Used in the Investigation of Karst Hydrology By Charles J. Taylor and Earl A. Greene Chapter 3 of Field Techniques for Estimating Water Fluxes Between Surface Water and Ground Water Edited by Donald O. Rosenberry and James W. LaBaugh Techniques and Methods 4–D2 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introduction...................................................................................................................................................75 Hydrogeologic Characteristics of Karst ..........................................................................................77 Conduits and Springs .........................................................................................................................77 Karst Recharge....................................................................................................................................80 Karst Drainage Basins .......................................................................................................................81 Hydrogeologic Characterization ...............................................................................................................82 Area of the Karst Drainage Basin ....................................................................................................82 Allogenic Recharge and Conduit Carrying Capacity ....................................................................83 Matrix and Fracture System Hydraulic Conductivity ....................................................................83
    [Show full text]
  • Backpacking: Bird Knob
    1 © 1999 Troy R. Hayes. All rights reserved. Preface As a new Scoutmaster, I wanted to take my troop on different kinds of adventure. But each trip took a tremendous amount of preparation to discover what the possibilities were, to investigate them, to pick one, and finally make the detailed arrangements. In some cases I even made a reconnaissance trip in advance in order to make sure the trip worked. The Pathfinder is an attempt to make this process easier. A vigorous outdoor program is a key element in Boy Scouting. The trips described in these pages range from those achievable by eleven year olds to those intended for fourteen and up (high adventure). And remember what the Irish say: The weather determines not whether you go, but what clothing you should wear. My Scouts have camped in ice, snow, rain, and heat. The most memorable trips were the ones with "bad" weather. That's when character building best occurs. Troy Hayes Warrenton, VA [Preface revised 3-10-2011] 2 Contents Backpacking Bird Knob................................................................... 5 Bull Run - Occoquan Trail.......................................... 7 Corbin/Nicholson Hollow............................................ 9 Dolly Sods (2 day trip)............................................... 11 Dolly Sods (3 day trip)............................................... 13 Otter Creek Wilderness............................................. 15 Saint Mary's Trail ................................................ ..... 17 Sherando Lake .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying Stream Flow Loss to Groundwater on Alluvial Valley Streams in Sonoma County
    Quantifying stream flow loss to groundwater on alluvial valley streams in Sonoma County Kelly Janes & Jose Carrasco LA 222 Term Project Abstract Surface flow is a crucial factor for the ecology of a stream. River-groundwater interactions, in turn, are crucial for these flows, as they determine whether streams are gaining or loosing surface flow. Gill Creek, in California’s wine county, is a prime case study of these river- aquifer interactions, and their ecological and social implications. We took flow measurements at various places along the longitudinal profile of Gill Creek, with the purpose of finding if discharge decreases as the creek passes through an alluvial fan formation in Alexander Valley, Sonoma County, and if so at what rates. Results suggest Gill Creek is a “losing stream,” and conclusions are that further studies of the stream and its relation to the aquifer are needed to more adequately address the prevention of stranding of anadromous fish species. Introduction In the Russian River, river-ground water interactions influence the timing and magnitude of surface stream flows and therefore are key processes that determine the habitat suitability for endangered and threatened salmonids found there (URRSA, 2009). For example, juvenile steelhead rear in Russian River tributary streams before outmigrating to the ocean as smolts (URRSA, 2009). In the Russian River watershed anadromous fish species, including juvenile steelhead, use spawning and rearing habitats usually found in its tributaries upstream of and within alluvial fans, and adequate flow is important to creating quality rearing habitat for juvenile steelhead. (URRSA, 2009). Numerous tributary streams drain to the Russian River from steep canyons across the alluvial fans that occur at the creeks’ canyon outlets (URRSA, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT 8/8/2013 Updates at Chapter 59 -- Three Tales of Two St
    Chapter 59 -- Three Tales of Two St. Pauls Chute's Cave Let us briefly move to St. Paul's Minnesota's neighbor, Minneapolis. When S.H. Chute excavated a 2.5-meter tunnel to provide water to his Phoenix Four Mill in 1864, the project encountered a cave and was abandoned. A bulkhead built during 1875 excavation for a tailrace, however, made the suitable for sub-urban excursions. From the Saint Paul and Minneapolis Pioneer and Tribune, August 26 of the following year, Chute's Cave -- A Boat Ride of 2,000 Feet Under Main Street. The mouth of the "Chute's Cave" is just below the springs, and the bottom of this cave is covered with about eighteen inches of water. For the moderate sum of ten cents you can take a seat in a boat with a flaming torch at the bow, and with a trusty pilot sail up under Main street a distance of about 2,000 feet, between pure white sandstone, and under a limestone arch which forms the roof. It is an inexpensive and decidedly interesting trip to take. Stereopticon view showing a flat- bottomed boat and pole. Saint Paul and Minneapolis Pioneer and Tribune, December 1, 1889, But a few years ago not a day passed that did not bring in visitors. A stream of water ran the whole length of the cave, and for the small consideration of a dime, a grim, Charon-like individual would undertake to convey, in a rude sort of a boat, all visitors, who were inclined, for the distance of a quarter or a mile or thereabouts into the gloomy passage.
    [Show full text]
  • 9.13 Geomorphic Controls on Hyporheic Exchange Across Scales - Watersheds to Particles 2 3 Steven M
    Wondzell and Gooseff: Treatise in Fluvial Geomorpholgy – Geomorphic Controls on Hyporheic Exchange 1 9.13 Geomorphic Controls on Hyporheic Exchange Across Scales - Watersheds to Particles 2 3 Steven M. Wondzell 4 U.S. Forest Service, 5 Pacific Northwest Research Station, 6 Olympia Forest Sciences Laboratory, 7 Olympia, WA 98512 USA. 8 Phone: 360-753-7691 9 E-mail: [email protected] 10 11 Michael N. Gooseff 12 Civil & Environmental Engineering Department, 13 Pennsylvania State University, 14 University Park, PA 16802 USA 15 Phone: 814- 867-0044 16 E-mail: [email protected] 1 Wondzell and Gooseff: Treatise in Fluvial Geomorpholgy – Geomorphic Controls on Hyporheic Exchange 17 Abstract 18 19 We examined the relationship between fluvial geomorphology and hyporheic exchange flows. 20 We use geomorphology as a framework to understand hyporheic process and how these 21 processes change with location within a stream network, and over time in response to changes in 22 stream discharge and catchment wetness. We focus primarily on hydostatic and hydrodynamic 23 processes – the processes where linkages to fluvial geomorphology are most direct. Hydrostatic 24 processes result from morphologic features that create elevational head gradients whereas 25 hydrodynamic processes result from the interaction between stream flow and channel 26 morphologic features. We provide examples of the specific morphologic features that drive or 27 enable hyporheic exchange and we examine how these processes interact in real stream networks 28 to create complex subsurface flow nets through the hyporheic zone. 29 30 31 Key words 32 33 Hyporheic, step-pool sequence, pool-riffle sequence, meander bends, back channels, floodplain 34 spring brooks, mid-channel islands, stream bedforms, pumping exchange, saturated hydraulic 35 conductivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimated 100-Year Peak Flows and Flow Volumes in the Big Lost River and Birch Creek at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho
    Estimated 100-Year Peak Flows and Flow Volumes in the Big Lost River and Birch Creek at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho By L.C. Kjelstrom and Charles Berenbrock U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4163 Prepared in Cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy Boise, Idaho 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL $URVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Information Services 230 Collins Road Box 25286 Boise, ID 83702-4520 Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Abstract................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................^ 1 Purpose and scope......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Description of study area.............................................................................................................................................. 3 Previous investigations ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]