CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY FOR THE VILLA AT MISSION SAN LUIS REY CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, CITY OF OCEANSIDE, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA Prepared for
Tierra Data Inc.
10110 W. Lilac Road
Escondido, CA 92026
Spindrift Project No. 2016-011
Prepared by Arleen Garcia-Herbst, RPA
March 2017
4901 Morena Blvd., Suite 208 San Diego, CA 92117 Phone: 858-333-7202 Fax: 855-364-3170
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ...... ES-1
Section 1 Introduction ...... 1-1
1.1 Project Location ...... 1-1 1.2 Project Description ...... 1-1 1.3 Area of Potential Effects (APE)...... 1-1 1.4 Regulatory Context ...... 1-2 1.5 Report Organization ...... 1-2
Section 2 Setting ...... 2-1
2.1 Existing Conditions ...... 2-1 2.1 Regulatory Setting ...... 2-7
Section 3 Methods ...... 3-1
3.1 Personnel Qualifications ...... 3-1 3.2 Records Search Methods ...... 3-2 3.3 Native American Coordination Methods ...... 3-2 3.4 Field Methods ...... 3-3
Section 4 Results and Management Recommendations ...... 4-1
4.1 Records Search ...... 4-1 4.2 Native American Coordination Results ...... 4-3 4.3 Field Survey Results ...... 4-3 4.4 Management Considerations ...... 4-4
Section 5 References ...... 5-1
Tables
Table 1 Previous Investigations within 0.5 Mile Radius of the Project APE Table 2 Previously Recorded Sites within 0.5 Mile Radius of the Project APE Table 3 Caltrans Historic Bridges within 0.5 Miles of the Project APE
Figures
Figure 1 Project Location Map Figure 2 Project Area Map Figure 3 Records Search Boundary Map Figure 4 Survey Coverage Map
SPINDRIFT i TABLE OF CONTENTS
Appendices
Appendix A Records Search Confirmation Appendix B Native American Coordination Appendix C Project Photos Appendix D Confidential DPR Forms Figure 5 Confidential – Records Search Results Map
SPINDRIFT ii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
ACBCI Agua Caliente Band of Indians APE Area of Potential Effects APN Assessor’s Parcel Number Caltrans California Department of Transportation CCR California Code of Regulations CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CHL California Historical Landmarks CHRIS California Historical Resources Information System City City of Oceanside County County of San Diego CRHR California Register of Historical Resources CRM Cultural Resource Management CUP Conditional Use Permit DPR California Department of Parks and Recreation EIR Environmental Impact Report EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map GDS Guidelines Determining Significance GPS Global Positioning System Km Kilometers MHCP Multiple Habitat Conservation Program MLD Most Likely Descendant NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NEPA National Environmental Protection Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service NRHP National Register of Historic Places NPS National Park Service PD Plan Mission San Luis Rey de Francia Planned Development Plan PI Principal Investigator Project Villa at Mission San Luis Rey Continuing Care Retirement Community Project PRC Public Resources Code RDO Rancho Del Oro RPO Resource Protection Ordinance RPA Register of Professional Archaeologists SCIC South Coastal Information Center SFHA Special Flood Hazard Area Spindrift Spindrift Archaeological Consulting, LLC SR State Route SSURGO Soil Survey Geographic Database TUA Traditional Use Area UCSB University of California Santa Barbara USDA United States Department of Agriculture USGS United States Geological Survey
SPINDRIFT iii NADB
National Archaeological Database
Author: Arleen Garcia-Herbst
Consulting Firm: Spindrift Archaeological Consulting, LLC
Report Date: March 2017
Report Title: Cultural Resources Inventory for the Villa at Mission San Luis Rey Continuing Care Retirement Community Project, City of Oceanside – County of San Diego, California
Prepared by: Spindrift Archaeological Consulting, LLC, 4901 Morena Blvd., Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92117
Submitted to: Tierra Data Inc. Project No. 2016-011 Acreage Approximately 8.01 acres Keywords: Villa at Mission San Luis Rey Continuing Care Retirement Community, Inventory, P-37-000241/ CA-SDI-241/ W-1283/ Mission San Luis Rey de Francia
SPINDRIFT iv Executive Summary
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2016, Tierra Data Inc. retained Spindrift Archaeological Consulting, LLC (Spindrift), to conduct a cultural resources inventory of the proposed Villa at Mission San Luis Rey Continuing Care Retirement Community Project (hereafter known as Project) in the City of Oceanside (City). The entire Project Area of Potential Effects (APE) is comprised of approximately 8.01 acres. The Project APE is located in San Diego County (County), California.
The inventory included a records search, literature review, and field survey. The records search results indicated sixty-two (62) previous cultural resources studies were conducted within a 0.5-mile radius of the Project APE, and fourteen (14) cultural resources have previously been recorded within a 0.5-mile radius of the Project APE.
One (1) cultural resource has been previously recorded within the Project APE (P-37-000241/ CA-SDI- 241/ W-1283/ Mission San Luis Rey de Francia). A field survey was conducted as part of this inventory and one (1) cultural resource was identified on the ground surface within the Project APE (P-37-000241/ CA-SDI-241/ W-1283/ Mission San Luis Rey de Francia). Recommendations for the management of unanticipated discoveries are provided in this report. The Lead Agency, the City of Oceanside (City), is responsible for ensuring compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
SPINDRIFT ES-1 SECTIONONE Introduction
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION
In 2016, Spindrift was retained by Tierra Data Inc. to conduct a cultural resources inventory survey of the proposed Villa at Mission San Luis Rey Continuing Care Retirement Community Project (Project APE), located in San Diego County (County), California. A pedestrian field survey of the approximately 8.01- acre Project APE was required to identify potentially significant cultural resources (archaeological sites, historic buildings, structures, and objects) that could be affected by the Project.
1.1 PROJECT LOCATION
The proposed Villa at Mission San Luis Rey Continuing Care Retirement Community Project (proposed “Project”) is located in the City of Oceanside (“City”), California, in northeastern San Diego County. The Project site is approximately 8.01 acres in size and is located in the southwest corner of the Mission property, bounded by the Mission Lavanderia to the east, Mission Avenue to the south and the seniors’ community of Mission Manor to the west. The County Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) for the site is 158-065-11-00. As shown on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute San Luis Rey topographic quadrangle (1968; photorevised 1975); the Project APE is located within San Diego County (Figures 1 and 2).
1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed Project is comprised of an irregularly shaped four-story building with a total of 222 senior living units. Of these, 92 are Supportive Independent Living units, 105 Assisted Living units, 25 Alzheimer’s/Dementia Care Units. There are a variety of common outdoor recreation areas including interpretative landscaped courtyards, pedestrian walkways, the Rose Garden, the Prayer Garden and the Plaza.
1.3 AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS (APE)
The Project APE consists of the horizontal and vertical limits of the Project, and includes the area within which significant impacts to historical resources could occur, as a result of the project development activities. The Project APE, subject to environmental review under CEQA, consists of all areas where activities associated with the Project are proposed. This includes all areas proposed for construction, vegetation removal, grading, trenching, stockpiling, staging, paving, and other elements described in the official project description above. The horizontal APE is illustrated in Figure 4; it measures approximately 8.01 acres in size.
The Project APE also includes the maximum depth below the surface to which excavations for project foundations and facilities will extend (vertical APE). Thus, the vertical APE includes all subsurface areas where archaeological deposits could be affected and varies across the project, depending on the type of infrastructure. Ground disturbance of up to 13 feet below the surface is assumed for utilities.
The vertical APE also is described as the maximum height of project features, which could impact the physical integrity as well as the integrity of setting of cultural resources, including districts and traditional
SPINDRIFT 1-1 SECTIONONE Introduction cultural properties. For the current project, the above-surface vertical ape is up to 50 feet above the surface, which is the maximum height of the proposed buildings and structures.
1.4 REGULATORY CONTEXT
To meet the regulatory requirements of this project, this cultural resources investigation was conducted pursuant to the provisions for the treatment of cultural resources in CEQA (Public Resources Code (PRC) § 21000 et seq.). The goal of CEQA is to develop and maintain a high-quality environment that serves to identify the significant environmental effects of the actions of a proposed project and to either avoid or mitigate those significant effects, where feasible. CEQA pertains to all proposed projects that require state or local government agency approval, including the enactment of zoning ordinances, the issuance of conditional use permits (CUPs), and the approval of project development maps.
Title 14, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Article 5, Section 15064.5 of CEQA applies to cultural resources of the historic and prehistoric periods. Any project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a cultural resource, either directly or indirectly, is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. As a result, such a project would require avoidance or mitigation of impacts to those affected resources. Significant cultural resources must meet at least one of four criteria that define eligibility for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) (PRC § 5024.1, Title 14 CCR, Section 4852), which will be discussed further in Section 2.1.1. Resources listed on or eligible for inclusion in the CRHR are considered Historical Resources under CEQA.
1.5 REPORT ORGANIZATION
The following report documents the study and its findings and was prepared in conformance with the California Office of Historic Preservation’s Archaeological Resource Management Reports: Recommended Contents and Format. Appendix A includes a confirmation of the records search with the California Historical Records Information System (CHRIS). Appendix B contains documentation of Native American outreach efforts. Appendix C presents photographs of the Project APE. Appendix D includes copies of the confidential Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 series forms.
Sections 6253, 6254, and 6254.10 of the California Code authorize state agencies to exclude archaeological site information from public disclosure under the Public Records Act. In addition, the California Public Records Act (Government Code §6250 et seq.) and California’s open meeting laws (The Brown Act, Government Code §54950 et seq.) protect the confidentiality of Native American cultural place information. Likewise, the Information Centers of the CHRIS, maintained by the Office of Historic Preservation, prohibit public dissemination of records search information. Appendix D was prepared as a confidential document, which is not intended for public distribution in either paper or electronic format.
SPINDRIFT 1-2 SECTIONTWO Setting
SECTION 2 SETTING
This section establishes the context for the evaluation of cultural resources through an overview of the environmental setting, the prehistory, and the ethnographic identity of the Project APE, as well as the regulatory setting. The Project is located in the City of Oceanside within the County of San Diego (see Figures 1 and 2).
2.1 Existing Conditions
2.1.1 Natural Setting
The project is in the southwest corner of the Mission property, bounded by the Mission Lavanderia to the east, Mission Avenue to the south and the seniors’ community of Mission Manor to the west. The site is vacant and supports a mixture of native and non-native vegetation types. The surrounding land uses consist of Special Commercial to the south and northwest, Medium Density Residential-A to the west and the Mission property to the north and east.
The Mission San Luis Rey de Francia and an area that is approximately one-half mile around the Mission are listed on the National Register of Historic Places (P-37-000241/ CA-SDI-241/ W-1283/ Mission San Luis Rey de Francia). The area is also designated as a California Historical Landmark (“Historic Preservation Area No. 1-Mission San Luis Rey”). Based on excavations at the site (RECON 2003, 2007; Magalousis and Kelsey 1992), no evidence of prehistoric or Mission-era activity was found, and the research value of the site has been exhausted based on these reports. Archival reports (summarized in the references cited above) provide evidence that the Villa site was used during the Mission era as a garden.
Although no intact cultural deposits, features, or significant numbers or variety of artifacts were recovered during trenching, monitoring activities during project implementation was recommended. Due to the proximity of the Lavanderia and the Mission San Luis Rey to the Villa site, the National Register status of the entire Mission complex, and in accordance with recommendations of the field investigators, monitoring of construction under the supervision of a qualified archeologist and a Native American will take place in order to ensure avoidance of these resources adjacent to the site.
2.1.2 Geology and Soils
Three geological formations were identified in the GeoSoils (2003) geotechnical assessment borings and confirmed in the RECON (2003) trenches. Site-specific materials consist of colluvium/topsoil, younger alluvium, and older alluvium. The majority of the property is mantled by colluvium/topsoil. These soils are dark brown silty sand to a depth of 0.5 meter. Below the top mantle is an older light brown to orange brown sandy silt/Quaternary-age alluvial sediments. Below this layer is an older alluvium sediment that is light orange brown to reddish brown, sandy silt to silty sand to sand (GeoSoils 2003:4-5).
According to USGS geological maps, two geological deposits underlie the Project APE: primarily young alluvial flood-plain deposits (Qya, Holocene and late Pleistocene) and old alluvial flood-plain deposits, undivided (Qoa, late to middle Pleistocene) along the eastern edge of the Project APE (Kennedy and Tan 2002).
SPINDRIFT 2-1 SECTIONTWO Setting
According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) soil mapping, two (2) soil units, or types, have been mapped within the Project APE: Ramona sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes (RaB) and Salinas clay, 2 to 5 percent slopes (ScB) (USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service 2016). The Ramona series is a member of the fine-loamy, mixed, thermic family of Typic Haploxeralfs. Typically, Ramona soils have brown, slightly and medium acid, sandy loam and fine sandy loam A horizons, reddish brown and yellowish red, slightly acid, sandy clay loam B2t horizons, and strong brown, neutral, fine sandy loam C horizons. The Salinas series, in the southern two-thirds of the Project APE, consists of deep, well drained soils that formed in alluvium weathered from sandstone and shale. Salinas soils are typically found on alluvial plains, fans, and terraces and have slopes of 0 to 9 percent.
The Project APE is primarily either within the “1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard” (Zone A, AE, A99, AO, AH, AR, V, VE), with the easternmost extent of the Project in the “0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard” (Zone X), as mapped on the National Flood Hazard Layer determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA 2012). Flood hazard areas identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) are identified as a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). SFHAs are defined as the areas that will be inundated by the flood event, having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The 1-percent annual chance flood is also referred to as the “base flood” or “100-year flood.” SFHAs are labeled as Zone A, Zone AO, Zone AH, Zones A1-A30, Zone AE, Zone A99, Zone AR, Zone AR/AE, Zone AR/AO, Zone AR/A1-A30, Zone AR/A, Zone V, Zone VE, and Zones V1-V30. Moderate flood hazard areas, labeled Zone B or Zone X (shaded) are also shown on the FIRM, and are the areas between the limits of the base flood and the 0.2-percent-annual-chance (or 500-year) flood. The areas of minimal flood hazard, which are the areas outside the SFHA and higher than the elevation of the 0.2- percent-annual-chance flood, are labeled Zone C or Zone X (un-shaded).
2.1.3 Vegetation and Wildlife
The site is generally flat and mostly largely ruderal, dominated by disturbance-related, non-native and weedy forbs but a few specimens of more mesic conditions that have colonized and survived repeated disturbance. The non-native dominance and disturbed condition is the result of previous cultivation during the Mission era, drainages that once entered the site from the south and east being blocked by road construction, and regular disking to manage weeds to allow use of the site as an overflow parking lot during popular events at the Mission. The site was kept completely clear from the 1930s through 1970s (Historic Aerials 2017), but in the 1980s, willows (Salix spp.) and Mexican fan palms (Washingtonia robusta) propagated and grew and were avoided by the more recent disking. Pockets of moisture-dependent plants survive in depressions dominated by clay soils. These plants included yerba mansa (Anemopsis californica), Mexican rush (Juncus mexicanus), willows (Salix spp.), and salt-grass (Distichlis spicata). The willows have an under-story of upland weedy forbs, consistent with their recent emergence and the lack of supplemental water input to the site. Various escaped ornamental shrubs and trees occur along the site margins.
The open nature of the site observed during the site visit meant few animal species were observed. Bird species included a red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) overhead, northern mocking birds (Mimus polyglottus), black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans), and western kingbirds (Tyrannus verticalis) were using the tress as perches from which to capture insect prey. White-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys) and house finches (Haemorhous mexicanus) were seen foraging on the mostly bare ground. A killdeer (Charadrius vociferous) was heard but not seen.
SPINDRIFT 2-2 SECTIONTWO Setting
No sensitive plant or wildlife species were detected. Also, no critical habitat has been designated on the site for federally threatened or endangered species. The potential for thread-leaved brodiaea (Brodiaea filifolia) in the north east of the site appears to have been eliminated by repeated disking.
2.1.4 Cultural Setting
The following sections have been excerpted from the County of San Diego Guidelines for Determining Significance (GDS), Cultural Resources: Archaeological and Historic Resources (GDS 2007) and serves to provide a comparative framework for the prehistory of the region and context for this inventory survey report. Archaeological evidence reveals that San Diego County has a long cultural history beginning approximately 10,000 years ago. The following cultural background discusses the characteristics of each cultural period of prehistory and history. The information that follows is reproduced with the permission of the author, Dennis Gallegos. The references cited in this section can be found in GDS (2007).
PRE-CONTACT BACKGROUND
The body of current research of Native American (Pre-Contact) occupation in San Diego County recognizes the existence of at least two major cultural traditions, discussed here as Early Period/Archaic and Late Period, based upon general economic trends and material culture. Within San Diego County, the Early Period/Archaic includes the period from 10,000 to 1,300 years ago, while the Late Period is from 1,300 years ago to historic (Spanish) contact. The Post-contact/Historic Period covers the time from Spanish contact to present. Terminology used for the past 10,000 year history of San Diego County includes a mixture of ideas of ordering archaeological sites using terms for peoples, collections of artifacts, and temporal time frames. The first ordering was by Malcolm Rogers who used the terms: Shell- Midden people, Scraper-Maker culture (scraper-makers), and Yuman (Rogers 1929). Malcolm Rogers later revised his chronology to use the terms “San Dieguito” (Scraper-Maker), “La Jolla culture” (Shell- Midden people) and “Yuman” (Rogers 1945). Claude Warren characterized the San Dieguito Tradition as: “… a wide range of scraper types made on side-struck flakes and finished by well controlled percussion flaking, leaf-shaped knives or large points of several varieties, leaf-shaped, lanceolate and slightly shouldered points in small number. Chipped stone crescents, often eccentric in form, hammerstones and flaked tools are few in number. Milling stones and manos are noticeably absent” (Warren 1968). Warren’s revision to Rogers’ La Jolla culture, was called the Encinitas Tradition wherein he identifies: “…the majority of flaked stone tools being percussion flaked and made from local macrocrystalline rock. A large percentage of the tool assemblage is composed of chopping, scraping and cutting tools and hammerstones. Projectile points are rare and rather large, suggesting the use of darts, rather than bow and arrow. Ground stone items include large numbers of manos and milling stones usually shaped through use, and occasional items such as doughnut stones, discs and cogstones…Bone tools are rare but include awls, antler flakers, beads…Shell items are also limited, but include beads, pendants…Basketry is represented…Loosely flexed burials are found throughout the area…” (Warren et al. 1968). Warren has more recently updated his chronology and for the San Dieguito Tradition (Initial Occupation), has since included milling tools and a wider range of tools and food sources, and now discusses the potential of Transitional and intermediate stages of occupation to cover the past 10,000 years of Native American occupation in San Diego County (Warren 1998). Early Man in San Diego County was discussed by George Carter in the 1950s; however, little to no evidence of Pleistocene human occupation supports this hypothesis (Carter 1957).
SPINDRIFT 2-3 SECTIONTWO Setting
Early Period/Archaic
The Early Period/Archaic includes the San Dieguito, La Jolla and Pauma complexes, which are poorly defined, as are the interrelationships between contemporaneous inland, desert, and coastal assemblages (Gallegos 1987). Initially believed to represent big game hunters, the San Dieguito people are better typified as a hunting and gathering society. These people had a relatively diverse and non-specialized economy wherein relatively mobile bands accessed and used a wide range of plant, animal, and lithic resources. Movement of early groups from the California desert may have been spurred by the gradual desiccation of the vast pluvial lake system that dominated inland basins and valleys during the early to middle Holocene. This hypothesis is supported by the similarity between Great Basin assemblages and those of Early Holocene Archaic sites in San Diego County. Several researchers recognized the regional similarity of artifacts and grouped these contemporaneous complexes under the nomenclature of either the Western Pluvial Lakes Tradition or the Western Lithic Co-tradition (Bedwell 1970; Davis et al. 1969; Moratto 1984; Rogers 1939; Warren 1967).
Early migrations into San Diego County may have come from the north. Recent work on the northern Channel Islands near Santa Barbara demonstrates island occupation dating back to the terminal Pleistocene, roughly 11,600 years ago (Erlandson et al. 1996; Johnson et al. 2000). At this early date, a fully maritime-adapted population exploited shellfish and used seaworthy boats to ply channel waters. Fish were captured using bone gorges by 10,000 years ago (Rick et al. 2001). Such early dates are lacking for the adjacent Santa Barbara mainland; presumably because the rise in sea level brought about by post- Pleistocene deglaciation would have inundated sites along the late Pleistocene/early Holocene coastlines. At this time in San Diego County, the shoreline stood two to six kilometers (km) farther seaward than today’s coast (Masters and Gallegos 1997). Therefore, any evidence for early coastal adaptation coeval with that of the northern Channel Islands may have been destroyed within this two to six km paleo- shoreline area by sea encroachment thousands of years ago.
The origin of coastal populations in San Diego County and subsequent interaction between these populations and Great Basin/desert groups is a subject of some debate (Gallegos 1987). Whether they migrated into San Diego County from the coast or inland, the first occupants immediately exploited coastal and inland resources of plants, animals, shellfish, and fish (Gallegos 1991; Moriarty 1967; Kaldenberg 1982; Kyle et al. 1998).
The development of a generalized economic system indicates that the initial occupation, referred to here as San Dieguito can be placed within the general Archaic pattern. Archaic cultures occur within North America at slightly different times in different areas, but are generally correlated with local economic specialization growing out of the earlier Paleo-Indian Tradition (Willig et al. 1988). Archaic cultures are often represented by more diverse artifact assemblages and more complex regional variation than PaleoIndian traditions. This is generally thought to have resulted from the gradual shift away from a herd- based hunting focus to a more diverse and area specific economy.
The earliest known sites are found near coastal lagoons and river valleys of San Diego County. These sites are the Harris Site (CA-SDI-149), Agua Hedionda sites (CA-SDI- 210/UCLJ-M-15 and CA-SDI- 10695), Rancho Park North (CA-SDI-4392/SDM-W-49), and Remington Hills (CA-SDI-11069), dating from 9,500 to 8,000 years ago. The northern San Diego County coastal lagoons supported large
SPINDRIFT 2-4 SECTIONTWO Setting populations, circa 6,000 years ago, as shown by the numerous radiocarbon-dated sites adjacent to these lagoons. After 3,000 to roughly 1,500 years ago, there are fewer archaeological sites in northern San Diego County. This reduction in number of archaeological sites can be attributed to the slowing of the rise in sea level and concomitant siltation of coastal lagoons causing the depletion of shellfish and other lagoon resources (Gallegos 1985; Miller 1966; Warren and Pavesic 1963). Archaeological sites dated to circa 2,000 years ago are found in the Camp Pendleton area (Byrd and Reddy 2002), wherein shellfish (Donax gouldii) were collected from open-shore sandy beach habitat; and bay species were still abundant in San Diego Bay, and present but not as dominate in other lagoons. Batiquitos Lagoon and perhaps other lagoons reopened circa 1,500 years ago, therein producing shellfish, but not in the quantity, size or variety of shellfish as documented for the early to middle Holocene (Miller 1966, Gallegos 1985).
The La Jolla and Pauma complexes, which are referred to as following the San Dieguito Complex, may simply represent seasonal or geographic variations of the somewhat older and more general San Dieguito Complex. Inland Early/Archaic Period occupation sites have been reported in coastal settings, transverse valleys, sheltered canyons, benches and knolls (True 1958; Warren et al. 1961). In north San Diego County, noncoastal sites were termed “Pauma Complex” by True (1958, 1980), and were defined as containing a predominance of grinding implements (manos and metates), a general lack of shellfish remains, a greater tool variety, and express an emphasis on both gathering and hunting (True 1958, 1980; Warren et al. 1961; Waugh 1986).
Early Period/Archaic sites from 10,000 to 1,300 years ago within San Diego County include a range of sites that comprise coastal and inland valley habitation sites, inland hunting and milling camps, and quarry sites, usually in association with fine-grain metavolcanic material. Material culture assemblages during this long period are remarkably similar in many respects. These deposits may well represent a process of relative terrestrial economic stability and presumably slow cultural change. Though various cultural traits developed or disappeared during the long span of 10,000 to 1,300 years ago, there is a clear pattern of cultural continuity during this period.
Late Period
During the Late Period (circa 1,300 to historic contact), a material culture pattern, similar to that of historic Native Americans, becomes apparent in the archaeological record. The economic pattern during this period appears to be one of the most intensive and efficient exploitation of local resources. The prosperity of these highly refined economic patterns is well evidenced by the numerous Kumeyaay/Diegueño and Luiseño habitation sites scattered throughout San Diego County. This increase in Late Period site density probably reflects both better preservation of the most recent archaeological record and a gradual population increase within the region. Artifacts and cultural patterns reflecting this Late Period pattern include small projectile points, pottery, the establishment of permanent or semi- permanent seasonal village sites, a proliferation of acorn milling sites in the uplands, the presence of obsidian from the Imperial Valley source Obsidian Butte, and interment by cremation.
Luiseño occupation in northern San Diego County during the late Holocene has been viewed as an occupation that migrated from the desert to the coast (Rogers 1966), an incursion called “the Shoshonean Wedge” (Kroeber 1925). Late Period culture patterns were shared with groups along the northern and eastern periphery of San Diego County, incorporating many elements of their neighbors’ culture into their
SPINDRIFT 2-5 SECTIONTWO Setting own cultures. This transference and melding of cultural traits between neighboring groups makes positive association of archaeological deposits with particular ethnographically known cultures difficult. This is particularly true of the groups within San Diego County. Although significant differences exist between Luiseño and Kumeyaay/Diegueño cultures (including linguistic stock), the long interaction of these groups during the Late Period resulted in the exchange of many social patterns. Archaeologists must rely heavily on ethnographic accounts of group boundaries as recorded during the historic period, although it is not known how long these boundaries had been in place or the validity of these boundaries as presently reported.
Kroeber (1925) placed the Kumeyaay and Luiseño boundary between Agua Hedionda and Batiquitos Lagoon. According to Luomala (1978) the territory of the Ipai extended along the coast from the San Luis Rey River in the north to San Diego Bay in the south with San Felipe Creek marking the eastern boundary. The territory of the Tipai, the southern group, extended south from San Diego Bay to include parts of Mexico and the southern mountains. Florence Shipek (1993) identified the northern and southern Kumeyaay/Diegueño tribal boundary as:
In 1769, the Kumeyaay national territory started at the coast about 100 miles south of the Mexican border (below Santo Tomas), thence north to the coast at the drainage divide south of the San Luis Rey River including its tributaries. Using the USGS topographic maps, the boundary with the Luiseño then follows that divide inland. The boundary continues on the divide separating Valley Center from Escondido and then up along Bear Ridge to the 2240 contour line and then north across the divide between Valley Center and Woods Valley up to the 1880-foot peak, then curving around east along the divide above Woods Valley (Shipek 1993).
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
The history of San Diego County is commonly presented in terms of Spanish, Mexican, and American political domination. A discussion of historic land use and occupation under periods of political rule by people of European and Mexican origin is justified on the basis of characteristics associated with each period, when economic, political, and social activities were influenced by the prevailing laws and customs. Certain themes are common to all periods, such as the development of transportation, settlement, and agriculture. Robinson (1969) provides a comprehensive account of public and privately owned land in California, with a discussion of laws, activities and events related to the development of the state.
Spanish Period (1769-1821)
The Spanish Period represents exploration, the establishment of the San Diego Presidio and missions at San Diego (1769) and San Luis Rey (1798), and asistencías (chapels) to the San Diego Mission at Santa Ysabel (1818) and to the San Luis Rey Mission at Pala (1816). Horses, cattle, agricultural foods and weed seeds, along with a new architectural style and method of building construction were also introduced. Spanish influence continued after 1821 (when California became part of Mexico). For a period of time under Mexican rule, the missions continued to operate as in the past, and laws governing the distribution of land were also retained.
Mexican Period (1821-1848)
SPINDRIFT 2-6 SECTIONTWO Setting
The Mexican Period includes the initial retention of Spanish laws and practices until shortly before secularization of the missions in 1834, a decade after the end of Spanish rule. Although several grants of land were made prior to 1834, vast tracts of land were dispersed through land grants offered after secularization. Cattle ranching prevailed over agricultural activities, and the development of the hide and tallow trade increased during the early part of this period. The Pueblo of San Diego was established and transportation routes expanded. The Mexican Period ended in 1848, as a result of the Mexican-American War.
American Period (1848 to Present)
The American Period began when Mexico ceded California to the United States under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Terms of the treaty brought about the creation of the Lands Commission, in response to the Homestead Act of 1851 that was adopted as a means of validating and settling land ownership claims throughout the state. Few Mexican ranchos remained intact because of legal costs and the difficulty of producing sufficient evidence to prove title claims. Much of the land that once constituted rancho holdings became available for settlement by immigrants to California. The influx of people to California and the San Diego region resulted from several factors, including the discovery of gold in the state, the conclusion of the American Civil War, the availability of free land (through passage of the Homestead Act), and later, the importance of San Diego County as an agricultural area, supported by roads, irrigation systems, and connecting railways. The growth and decline of towns occurred in response to an increased population and the economic boom and bust cycle in the late 1800s.
NATIVE AMERICAN PERSPECTIVE
In addition to the point of view discussed above, the County acknowledges that other perspectives exist to explain the presence of Native Americans in the region. The Native American perspective is that they have been here from the beginning, as described by their creation stories. Similarly, they do not necessarily agree with the distinction that is made between different archaeological cultures or periods, such as “La Jolla” and “San Dieguito”. They instead believe that there is a continuum of ancestry, from the first people to the present Native American populations of San Diego. To acknowledge this perspective, consultation with affected Native American communities can be beneficial to fully understand the impact to cultural resources. The consultation is typically administered pursuant to Senate Bill 18 and Assembly Bill 52.
2.1 Regulatory Setting
The public stewardship and management of historical resources are provided for in the local, state and federal policies and regulations that form the basis for the County of San Diego's development review process. This project has been completed in accordance with all applicable regulations, provided in the County of San Diego GDS, Cultural Resources: Archaeological and Historic Resources (GDS 2007), and per the cultural resources provisions of CEQA of 1970 (PRC §§ 21000–21177). Per these applicable regulations, impacts to cultural resources associated with this Project must be taken into consideration. These regulations are described in detail below.
SPINDRIFT 2-7 SECTIONTWO Setting
2.1.1 Public Resources Code and CEQA
CEQA states that:
The Legislature further finds and declares that it is the policy of the state to. .. Preserve for future generations. .. Examples of the major periods of California history (Section 21001).
CEQA requires that before approving discretionary projects the Lead Agency must identify and examine the significant adverse environmental effects which may result from that project. A project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment (Sections 15064.5(b) and 21084).
As it pertains to cultural resources, CEQA defines the term “historical resource” as the following:
(1) A resource listed in, or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission, for listing in the CRHR (Public Resources Code §5024.1, Title 14 CCR. Section 4850 et seq.).
(2) A resource included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in section 5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code or identified as significant in a historical resource survey meeting the requirements of section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code, shall be presumed to be historically or culturally significant. Public agencies must treat any such resource as significant unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that it is not historically or culturally significant.
(3) Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California may be considered to be an historical resource, provided the lead agency’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record.
Generally, a resource shall be considered by the lead agency to be “historically significant” if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the CRHR (Pub. Res. Code §5024.1, Title 14, Section 4852) including the following:
(1) It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States;
(2) It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history;
(3) It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values; or
(4) It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation.
The fact that a resource is not listed in, or determined eligible for listing in the CRHR, not included in a local register of historical resources (pursuant to section 5020.1(k) of the PRC), or identified in an
SPINDRIFT 2-8 SECTIONTWO Setting historical resources survey (meeting the criteria in section 5024.1(g) of the PRC) does not preclude a lead agency from determining that the resource may be a historical resource as defined in PRC Section 5020.1(j) or 5024.1.
According to CEQA (§15064.5b), a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA defines a substantial adverse change as:
(1) Substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource means physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired.
(2) The significance of an historical resource is materially impaired when a project:
(A) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for, inclusion in the CRHR; or
(B) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that account for its inclusion in a local register of historical resources pursuant to Section 5020.1(k) of the PRC or its identification in an historical resources survey meeting the requirements of section 5024.1(g) of the PRC, unless the public agency reviewing the effects of the project establishes by a preponderance of evidence that the resource is not historically or culturally significant; or
(C) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its eligibility for inclusion in the CRHR as determined by a lead agency for purposes of CEQA.
Section 15064.5(c) of CEQA applies to effects on archaeological sites and contains the following additional provisions regarding archaeological sites:
(1) When a project will impact an archaeological site, a lead agency shall first determine whether the site is an historical resource, as defined in subsection (a).
(2) If a lead agency determines that the archaeological site is an historical resource, it shall refer to the provisions of Section 21084.1 of the PRC, and this section, Section 15126.4 of the Guidelines, and the limits contained in Section 21083.2 of the PRC do not apply.
(3) If an archaeological site does not meet the criteria defined in subsection (a), but does meet the definition of a unique archaeological resource in Section 21083.2 of the PRC, the site shall be treated in accordance with the provisions of section 21083.2. The time and cost limitations described in PRC Section 21083.2 (c-f) do not apply to surveys and site evaluation activities intended to determine whether the project location contains unique archaeological resources.
SPINDRIFT 2-9 SECTIONTWO Setting
(4) If an archaeological resource is neither a unique archaeological nor an historical resource, the effects of the project on those resources shall not be considered a significant effect on the environment. It shall be sufficient that both the resource and the effect on it are noted in the Initial Study or Environmental Impact Report, if one is prepared to address impacts on other resources, but they need not be considered further in the CEQA process.
Section 15064.5 (d) & (e) contain additional provisions regarding human remains. Regarding Native American human remains, paragraph (d) provides: (d) When an initial study identifies the existence of, or the probable likelihood, of Native American human remains within the project, a lead agency shall work with the appropriate Native Americans as identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), as provided in PRC §5097.98. The applicant may develop an agreement for treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any items associated with Native American burials with the appropriate Native Americans as identified by the NAHC. Action implementing such an agreement is exempt from:
(1) The general prohibition on disinterring, disturbing, or removing human remains from any location other than a dedicated cemetery (Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5).
(2) The requirement of CEQA and the Coastal Act.
SPINDRIFT 2-10 SECTIONTHREE Methods
SECTION 3 METHODS
Chapter 3 discusses the different methods and methodologies utilized during the cultural resources inventory survey of the Project APE.
3.1 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS
All phases of the cultural resources investigation were conducted under the supervision of Registered Professional Archaeologist Arleen Garcia-Herbst, C.Phil., RPA, who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for a prehistoric and historical archaeologist. Fieldwork was completed by Ms. Michelle Courtney and the technical report writingwas completed by Ms. Garcia- Herbst. Mr. George Herbst, M.Sc., RPA, provided technical report review and quality assurance. Resumes are available upon request.
Ms. Garcia-Herbst is a Secretary of the Interior-qualified Archaeologist and has been professionally involved with cultural resources management in California and Hawaii since 2006. She has extensive experience with the cultural and paleontological resources requirements of the City and County of San Diego, CEQA, Hawai‘i Revised Statutes and Administrative Rules, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). She is a City of San Diego, County of San Diego, and County of Riverside Qualified Archaeologist. While Ms. Garcia- Herbst's professional focus is in California and Hawaii, she also has project experience in Arizona, Nevada, Germany, Peru, and Argentina. She received her B.A. from the University of Arizona (1996), and completed her M.A. at the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB, 2000), is advanced to candidacy (C.Phil., 2006) and working on completing her Ph.D. thesis at the University of California, Santa Barbara.
Ms. Courtney’s professional experience includes more than 16 years in Cultural Resources Management (CRM). Primarily, her archaeological career has involved cataloging historic and prehistoric artifacts from data recovery projects where she’s been responsible for directing laboratory technicians for the sorting, analysis, and cataloging of lithic, bone, and marine shell artifacts, as well as experience in historic material. In addition, she has extensive experience conducting archaeological fieldwork including survey, testing, data recovery, excavation, and construction monitoring (including being a City of San Diego Archaeological Certified Monitor). Ms. Courtney has conducted cultural resources records searches, Native American coordination, archival research, and prepared archaeological site records. She has assisted with several reports and is competent at applying the regulations and requirements of the CEQA, Sections 106 and 110 of the NHPA, and NEPA. She has established budgets based on reviews of the collected materials and completed laboratory analysis and curation within such budgets. She has also prepared, delivered collections to, and maintains professional relations with local Native American groups, the San Diego Archaeological Center, and the San Diego Natural History Museum. Additionally, Ms. Courtney has paleontological monitoring and laboratory experience and is a City of San Diego Paleontological Certified Monitor.
Mr. Herbst is the Federal Preservation Officer for the Bureau of Reclamation. He defines and implements Reclamation CRM policies in accordance with U.S. statutory law and other state and local mandates in support of Reclamation’s mission to manage, develop, and protect water and related
SPINDRIFT 3-1 SECTIONTHREE Methods resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner. Serves as program lead for cultural and paleontological resources management. Mr. Herbst provides expert analysis and advice to regional staff, Reclamation leadership and senior leadership in the Commissioner's Office on complex cultural resource issues. Identifies program risk and applies advanced management analysis techniques to interpret meaning and evaluate findings. He reconciles conflicts between statutory requirements and program goals. As part of his duties, he also coordinates with regional and area offices collaboratively on policy implementation. In this position, he serves as Reclamation's expert representative at all internal and public meetings, committees and task forces. Forms internal controls and leads program reviews for Reclamation's CRM programs. Mr. Herbst develops and executes training programs to ensure Reclamation-wide understanding of CRM requirements and consistent application of policy. He organizes budget for program for current and out-year program activities. He also coordinates with NEPA program in developing policy, training, planning initiatives, and overall environmental compliance.
3.2 RECORDS SEARCH METHODS
A records search for the Project APE was completed by the South Coastal Information Center (SCIC) of the CHRIS at San Diego State University on 1 December 2016 (SCIC RSID# 9999, Appendix A) (Appendix A; see records search request map in Figure 3). The purpose of the records search was to determine the extent of previous surveys within a 0.5-mile (800-meter) radius of the proposed project location, and whether previously documented prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, architectural resources, or traditional cultural properties exist within this area.
In addition to the official records and maps for archaeological sites and surveys in San Diego County, the following historic references were also reviewed: Historic Property Data File for San Diego County (Office of Historic Preservation 2013a); The National Register Information System website (National Park Service 2013); Office of Historic Preservation, California Historical Landmarks website (Office Historic Preservation 2013b); California Historical Landmarks (Office of Historic Preservation 1996 and updates); and California Points of Historical Interest (Office of Historic Preservation 1992 and updates).
3.3 NATIVE AMERICAN COORDINATION METHODS
Spindrift contacted the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on 4 October 2016 to request a search of the Sacred Lands File for the Project APE. In a letter dated 6 October 2016, the NAHC said the search failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural resources located within the Project APE. The NAHC also provided a list of individuals and organizations in the Native American community that may be able to provide information about unrecorded sites in the project vicinity (Appendix B).
Spindrift contacted all persons and organizations on the NAHC contact list on 18 October 2016 by email or fax or on 19 October 2016 by certified mail. Spindrift requested information about unrecorded cultural resources that may exist within the current Project APE, and inquired about any concerns regarding sacred sites or traditional cultural properties in the vicinity that might be affected by the proposed action. A complete correspondence record is provided in Appendix B.
SPINDRIFT 3-2 SECTIONTHREE Methods
3.4 FIELD METHODS
Fieldwork was conducted by Spindrift Archaeologist Michelle Courtney on 20 December 2016, during which the 8.1acres of the Project APE were subjected to an intensive systematic pedestrian survey, under the guidance of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Identification of Historic Properties (National Park Service 1983), using transects spaced 15-meters apart (see survey coverage map in Figure 4). Notes were taken on the environmental setting and disturbances within the Project APE. The Project APE was mapped into a handheld Trimble Geo 6000 XH Global Positioning System (GPS) unit, which has decimeter accuracy. This GPS unit is also used to update the boundaries of any previously existing sites, and record the location of any new archaeological sites encountered during the survey.
The general morphological characteristics of the ground surface were inspected for indications of subsurface deposits that may be manifested on the surface, such as circular depressions or ditches. Whenever possible, the locations of subsurface exposures caused by such factors as rodent activity, water or soil erosion, or vegetation disturbances were examined for artifacts or for indications of buried deposits. No subsurface investigations or artifact collections were undertaken during the pedestrian survey.
SPINDRIFT 3-3 SECTIONFOUR Results and Management Recommendations
SECTION 4 RESULTS AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
This section discusses the various field survey and records search results as well as recommendations, management considerations and a conclusion. Information about cultural resources in and around the Project APE comes from the records search and literature review.
4.1 RECORDS SEARCH
The records search results indicated that sixty-three (63) previous cultural resources studies (Table 1 in Appendix A) were conducted within a 0.5-mile radius of the Project APE, and fourteen (14) cultural resources have previously been recorded within a 0.5-mile radius of the Project APE (Table 2 in Appendix A). The previous studies were conducted between 1977 and 2015.
One (1) cultural resource has been previously recorded within the Project APE (P-37-000241/ CA-SDI- 241/ W-1283/ Mission San Luis Rey de Francia). The site was first recorded in 1952 by ABE as the old mission area (CHRIS 2016). In 1970, the San Luis Rey Mission Church was nominated to the National Register. Mission San Luis Rey de Francia was founded by Father Fermín Francisco de Lasúen on June 13, 1798, as the 18th Spanish mission in California and is approximately 63 acres in size. The first small adobe chapel was built in 1798 and this was replaced in 1802 by a large adobe, tile-roofed church. Construction of the third and existing church was started in 1811 and completed in 1815. The mission was secularized by the Mexican Government in 1834, but was returned to the Catholic Church by the United States Government in 1865. Unlike nearly all the other 20 California missions, the remains of this church and other mission buildings, although in ruined condition, were still quite extensive in 1893, when the Catholic Church rededicated the mission as a Franciscan college. The old Mission is still used for this purpose. In 1989, the site record was updated by Caltrans and defined the current site boundary. The site boundary included a multi-component shell midden in an area used as an Indian garden and wells, which included pottery and either large mammal or human bone observed in the spoils of rodent burrows on a knoll to the northwest of the Mission buildings. Features noted include two cisterns, wells, red adobe brick features connected with a washing area (presumably the Lavanderia).Artifacts noted included Tizon brown ware, rare Chinese ceramics, Majolica, manos and flaked stone tools and debitage. Faunal remains observed include shell cobbles that appeared to be fire affected, burned cattle bone and fragments of red tile adobe brick. In this site record update, Caltrans noted that the site had undergone a subsurface test excavation on the east side of the Mission by Greenwood and Associates in 1978 that established that the deposit extended to a depth of 75 cm below the ground surface. In 2007, RECON conducted an archaeological reconnaissance Planning Area 9 at the Mission San Luis Rey, which based on the map in the report, corresponds directly with the Project APE (RECON 2007). The field survey by RECON in 2007 found the condition of the Project APE had not visibly changed from the conditions related in a previous July 2003 RECON report (RECON 2003). Ten trenches were excavated in the northern third of Planning Area 9 (the Project APE) to a maximum depth of 1.9 meters during the RECON investigations described in the 2003 report. The work was part of a Cultural Resource Exploration for Planning Areas 4, 9, and 11 at the Mission San Luis Rey de Francia. The archaeological investigations included an intensive on-foot examination for surface remains, backhoe trenching, geoarchaeological research, and artifact analysis. None of the trenches in Planning Area 9 contained evidence of artifact deposit, soil changes associated with human occupation, or isolated artifacts. Although no intact cultural deposits, features, or significant numbers or variety of artifacts were recovered during trenching by RECON, monitoring during
SPINDRIFT 4-1 SECTIONFOUR Results and Management Recommendations project implementation was recommended. Due to the proximity of the Lavanderia feature and the Mission to the Project APE, the National Register status of the entire Mission complex, and in accordance with recommendations of the field investigators, monitoring of construction under the supervision of a qualified archeologist and a Native American was recommended in order to ensure avoidance of these resources adjacent to the site. The City included this recommendation as part of its mitigation measures in the Project Initial Study/Environmental Checklist (City of Oceanside 2009). HISTORIC 1: Monitoring of ground preparation for construction will take place under the supervision of a qualified archeologist and a Native American. Monitors will inspect excavated soil to determine cultural status. As necessary, the monitors will direct the excavation crew to divert or slow soil removal to a place suitable to accommodate a reasonable level of soil examination. If appropriate, the monitors will screen for archeological materials with 1/8-inch mesh screens. Primarily, the monitors will be looking for worked stone, marine shell species, aboriginal pottery, human and non-human skeletal remains, fire-affected rock, charcoal, and other indications of buried archeologically relevant materials from either the historic or prehistoric eras. A review of California Inventory of Historic Resources (March 1976), indicated that there is one (1) inventoried historic property within the Project APE or within a 0.5-mile radius of the Project APE (SAN LUIS REY MISSION CHURCH (Landmark Plaque Number N52, Registration Date: 4/15/1970).
Resources listed as California Historical Landmarks (CHL; Office of Historic Preservation 1996) and on the Office of Historic Preservation website (Office of Historic Preservation 2015) were reviewed. The Mission area is also designated as a California Historical Landmark (“Historic Preservation Area No. 1- Mission San Luis Rey”).
The Caltrans State Historic Bridge Inventory (Caltrans 2013b) listed four historic bridges within a 0.5- mile radius of the Project APE. Additionally, the Caltrans Historic Bridge Local Inventory (Caltrans 2013a) listed no historic bridges within a 0.5-mile radius of the Project APE (Table 3).
TABLE 3. CALTRANS HISTORIC BRIDGES WITHIN 0.-5 MILES OF THE PROJECT APE
BRIDGE NAME DATE CALTRANS LOCATION AND NUMBER BUILT/WIDENED ELIGIBILITY EVALUATION
EL CAMINO REAL NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP UC STATE ROUTE 76 WB 1999 (CATEGORY 5) 57 1018L EL CAMINO REAL NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP UC STATE ROUTE 76 EB 1999 (CATEGORY 5) 57 1018R MISSION AVENUE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP UC STATE ROUTE 76 WB 1999 (CATEGORY 5) 57 1019L MISSION AVENUE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP STATE ROUTE 76 EB 1999 UC (CATEGORY 5)
SPINDRIFT 4-2 SECTIONFOUR Results and Management Recommendations
TABLE 3. CALTRANS HISTORIC BRIDGES WITHIN 0.-5 MILES OF THE PROJECT APE
BRIDGE NAME DATE CALTRANS LOCATION AND NUMBER BUILT/WIDENED ELIGIBILITY EVALUATION
57 1019R
4.2 NATIVE AMERICAN COORDINATION RESULTS
A search of the Sacred Lands File by the NAHC failed to indicate the presence of traditional cultural places or Native American cultural resources within the Project APE.
Spindrift received an email on 21 October 2016 from Victoria Harvey, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) Archaeological Monitoring Coordinator. It stated, “Thank you for including us in the consultation process for this project. However, a records check of the ACBCI cultural registry revealed that this project is not located within the Tribe’s Traditional Use Area (TUA). Therefore, we defer to the other tribes in the area. This letter shall conclude our consultation efforts.”
Spindrift also received a letter on 31 October 2016 from Shasta Gaughen, Pala Band of Mission Indians Tribal Historic Preservation Officer. The letter stated, “We have consulted our maps and determined that the project as described is not within the boundaries of the recognized Pala Indian Reservation. It is, however, within the boundaries of the territory that the tribe considers its Traditional Use Area (TUA). Therefore, we request to be kept in the information loop as the project progresses and would appreciate being maintained on the receiving list for project updates, reports of investigations, and/or any documentation that might be generated regarding previously reported or newly discovered sites. Further, recommend archaeological monitoring given the proximity of known cultural and historic resources. If the project boundaries are modified to extend beyond the currently proposed limits, we request updated information and the opportunity to respond to your changes.”
If any further comments are received after the submission of this report, then they will be forwarded to the lead agencies for further consideration and appropriate action. A complete record is provided in AppendixB.
4.3 FIELD SURVEY RESULTS
Fieldwork was conducted by Spindrift Archaeologist Michelle Courtney, during which the 8.1 acres of the Project APE were subjected to an intensive systematic pedestrian survey.
A Native American Monitor was not present during fieldwork. Saving Sacred Sites, a Luiseño Native American monitoring firm, was informed of the survey and the City’s invitation to participate, but they opted not to accompany Spindrift. The survey was completed on 20 December 2016 and the weather was clear; it was a sunny day in Oceanside with high, sporadic clouds.
SPINDRIFT 4-3 SECTIONFOUR Results and Management Recommendations
The study area is described in detail below. The Project APE is located next to the historic period buildings and structures that represent the San Luis Rey Mission and it is within a portion of the recorded site boundary for Site P-37-000241/ CA-SDI-241/ W-1283/ Mission San Luis Rey de Francia in Oceanside, California.
The pedestrian survey of the Project APE took place using transects spaced 1.5 meters/ 5 feet by Ms. Courtney, which were oriented North to South. Photographs were taken of the start and end of each transect.
Vegetation included pepper trees, cacti, and non-native grasses. The Project APE had been plowed and weeds had been cut. In most areas, the grasses are low and visibility is good. In the central northern area of the Project APE (sample photographed), the grass was more overgrown and visibility was fair.
Several homeless campsites were noted within the Project APE. There is a large homeless camp in the northern part of the Project APE. However, there is also a camp in the southwest part of the Project APE under pepper trees and on the eastern side of the property. Due to the homeless camps and high activity of pedestrian walking on site, with dogs or jogging, artifacts were not flagged during the survey. Flagging artifacts would have brought unwanted attention to them.
The soil within the Project APE is generally medium brown, silty sand. Angular pebbles and sub angular to sub rounded riverside cobbles were also on the surface. Along the south end of the Project APE, a dirt/gravel driveway was observed. On the northern edge of the Project APE, south of Mission Avenue, the soil is a light tannish brown and disturbed with broken up asphalt pieces noted in this area.
Modern refuse including plastic bags, soda bottles and cans, along with plastic and foil food wrappers and slippers can be seen throughout the Project APE. However, the concentration of modern refuse is highest in the northern part of the Project APE near Mission Avenue and the western area where homeless encampments are located.
Cultural resources were noted in the Project APE. All artifacts had a photograph taken and a location marked with GPS coordinates. Historic-period milk glass was identified. Additionally, prehistoric- period ceramics (Tizon brown ware) were noted throughout the Project APE. Evidence of prehistoric- period stone tool manufacture included identification of debitage, such as chert and metavolcanic fragments. Faunal remains were also noted in the form of a bone fragment, unidentifiable invertebrate shell fragments and whole Chione spp. shells were also noted. These artifacts appear to be related to the nearby Site P-37-000241/ CA-SDI-241/ W-1283/ Mission San Luis Rey de Francia Lavanderia feature.
4.4 MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
4.4.1 Conclusions
Cultural resources were identified within the Project APE during the field survey conducted in 2016 as part of this study that are consistent and likely associated with Site P-37-000241/ CA-SDI-241/ W-1283/ Mission San Luis Rey de Francia. The potential for subsurface historic- and prehistoric-period cultural resources is generally considered low to moderate within the northern third of the Project APE due to it having been previously investigated by RECON in 2003, but new artifacts having been identified on the
SPINDRIFT 4-4 SECTIONFOUR Results and Management Recommendations ground surface during this 2016 study. The potential for subsurface historic- and prehistoric-period cultural resources is generally considered moderate to high within the southern two-thirds of the Project APE due to it not having been included as part of the previous investigation by RECON in 2003, and new artifacts having been identified on the ground surface during this study. Additionally, Holocene- age alluvium, which has moderate sensitivity for cultural resources, may be present below the 0.5 feet of colluvium/topsoil. As a result of the discovery of evidence of prehistoric and Mission-era activity within the Project APE that is likely related to use during the Mission area as a garden, the boundary of Site P- 37-000241/ CA-SDI-241/ W-1283/ Mission San Luis Rey de Francia has been extended to the southwest to include most of the Project APE.
4.4.2 Monitoring
Due to the presence of a National Register listed property (Site P-37-000241/ CA-SDI-241/ W-1283/ Mission San Luis Rey de Francia) within the Project APE, and the moderate sensitivity of the potentially Holocene-age alluvium buried 0.5 feet below the ground surface within the Project APE for prehistoric and historic-period resources, Spindrift recommends that all ground-disturbing activity be monitored by an archaeological and Native American monitor, who has the authority to halt construction activity, in accordance with the unanticipated discovery procedures discussed below and the City’s Project Initial Study mitigation measures regarding potential impacts to buried cultural resources.
In the event of any unanticipated discoveries during construction, a less than significant impact to buried resources, if present, would occur with implementation of Mitigation Measures C-1 and C-2.
Mitigation Measures
C-1 All ground disturbing activities should be monitored by a qualified professional archaeologist and a Native American consultant, following the Guidelines for Monitors/Consultants of Native American Cultural, Religious, and Burial Sites established by the Native American Heritage Commission. Both monitors shall have the authority to halt construction activities in the event that cultural deposits, or those that are potentially cultural, are encountered. The monitors shall examine the deposits and, if the find is confirmed to be cultural in origin, which includes human remains and archaeological materials, then the protocols for unanticipated discovery shall be followed.
C-2 If subsurface deposits believed to be cultural or human in origin are discovered during construction, then all work must halt within a 50-foot radius of the discovery. The on-site archaeological monitor or Principal Investigator, meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for prehistoric and historic archaeology, shall be afforded a reasonable amount of time to evaluate the significance of the find. Work cannot continue at the discovery site until the archaeologist conducts sufficient research and data collection to make a determination that the resource is either 1) not cultural in origin; or 2) not potentially significant or eligible for listing on the NRHP or CRHR. If a potentially- eligible resource is encountered, then the
SPINDRIFT 4-5 SECTIONFOUR Results and Management Recommendations
archaeologist, lead agency, and project proponent shall arrange for either 1) total avoidance of the resource, if possible; or 2) test excavations to evaluate eligibility and, if eligible, total data recovery as mitigation. The determination shall be formally documented in writing and submitted to the lead agency as verification that the provisions in CEQA/National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) for managing unanticipated discoveries have been met.
In the event that evidence of human remains is discovered, construction activities within 50 feet of the discovery will be halted or diverted, and the requirements above will be implemented. Depending on the occurrence, a larger radius may be necessary and will be required at the discretion of the on- site archaeologist. In addition, the provisions of Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.98 of the California PRC, and Assembly Bill 2641 will be implemented. When human remains are discovered, state law requires that the discovery be reported to the County Coroner (Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code) and that reasonable protection measures be taken during construction to protect the discovery from disturbance (AB 2641). If the Coroner determines the remains are Native American, the Coroner notifies the NAHC, which then designates a Native American MLD for the project (Section 5097.98 of the PRC). The MLD may not be the same person as the tribal monitor. The designated MLD then has 48 hours from the time access to the property is granted to make recommendations concerning treatment of the remains (AB 2641). If the landowner does not agree with the recommendations of the MLD, the NAHC can mediate (Section 5097.94 of the PRC). If no agreement is reached, the landowner must rebury the remains where they will not be further disturbed (Section 5097.98 of the PRC). This will also include either recording the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center; using an open space or conservation zoning designation or easement; or recording a document with the county in which the property is located (AB 2641).
Implementation of the above mitigation measures will reduce impacts to buried cultural resources to a less than significant level.
The Lead Agency, the City of Oceanside, is responsible for ensuring compliance with these mitigation measures because damage to significant cultural resources is in violation of CEQA. Section 15097 of Title 14, Chapter 3, Article 7 of CEQA, Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting, “the public agency shall adopt a program for monitoring or reporting on the revisions which it has required in the project and the measures it has imposed to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects. A public agency may delegate reporting or monitoring responsibilities to another public agency or to a private entity which accepts the delegation; however, until mitigation measures have been completed the lead agency remains responsible for ensuring that implementation of the mitigation measures occurs in accordance with the program.”
SPINDRIFT 4-6 SECTIONFIVE References
SECTION 5 REFERENCES
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) 2013a Caltrans Local Bridge Survey, Structure Maintenance & Investigations website. Electronic Document, http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/structur/strmaint/hs_local.pdf, Viewed 29 December 2016. 2013b Caltrans State Bridge Survey, Structure Maintenance & Investigations website. Electronic Document, http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/structur/strmaint/hs_state.pdf, Viewed 29 December 2016.
City of Oceanside (City) 2009 Initial Study, City of Oceanside California: The Villa at Mission San Luis Rey Continuing Care Retirement Community (D-5-07, H-2-07).
Deméré, Tom A. and Walsh, S. L. 1993 Paleontological Resources of San Diego County. Unpublished Report prepared for the San Diego County Department of Public Works by the Department of Paleontology, San Diego Natural History Museum.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
2016 National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL). Electronic Document, https://fema.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=cbe088e7c8704464aa0fc34eb99e7f30, Viewed 29 December 2016 using Google Earth.
GDS 2007 County of San Diego Guidelines for Determining Significance – Cultural Resources: Archaeological and Historic Significance. Electronic Document, http://www.sandiegocounty.gov/dplu/docs/Cultural_Guidelines.pdf, Viewed 29 December 2016.
GeoSoils 2003 Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Retirement Center, Mission San Luis Rey, City of Oceanside, San Diego County. Ms prepared for the Mission San Luis Rey and the Lightfoot Planning Group.
Jennings, C.W., Strand, R.G., and Rogers, T.H. 1977 Geologic map of California: California Division of Mines and Geology, scale 1:750,000.
Kennedy, Michael P., and Siang S. Tan 2002 Geologic Map of the Oceanside 30’ x 60’ Quadrangle, California. California Geological Survey, Map No. 2, Scale 1:100,000. Electronic Document, http://www.quake.ca.gov/gmaps/RGM/oceanside/oceanside.html, Viewed 29 December 2016.
National Park Service (NPS) 1983 Archaeology and Historic Preservation: Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines. 48 FR (Federal Register) 44716-68. 2013 National Register Information System Website. Electronic document.
SPINDRIFT 5-1 SECTIONFIVE References
http://www.nr.nps.gov/nrloc1.htm, Viewed 29 December 2016.
Office of Historic Preservation 1992 California Points of Historical Interest. California Department of Parks and Recreation, Sacramento, California. 1996 California Historical Landmarks. California Department of Parks and Recreation, Sacramento, California. 2015 Office of Historic Preservation California Historical Landmarks Website, Electronic document. http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=21387, Viewed 29 December 2016.
RECON 2003 Cultural Resources Exploration for Three Expansion/Development Projects associated with the Mission San Luis Rey, Oceanside, California. Prepared for Mission San Luis Rey.
2007 Results of an Archaeological Reconnaissance of Planning Area 9 at the Mission San Luis Rey (RECON Number 4438A). Prepared for The Stratford Companies.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) 2014 SoilWeb: An Online Soil Survey Browser, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database for the United States. Available online: http://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/soilweb/, Viewed 29 December 2016.
SPINDRIFT 5-2 Figures
FIGURES
SPINDRIFT 1 Figures
Figure 1. Project Location Map
SPINDRIFT 2 Figures
Figure 2. Project Area Map
SPINDRIFT 3 Figures
Figure 3. Records Search Boundary Map
SPINDRIFT 4 Figures
Figure 4. Survey Coverage Map
SPINDRIFT 5 Appendices
APPENDIX A
SPINDRIFT South Coastal Information Center San Diego State University 5500 Campanile Drive San Diego, CA 92182-5320 Office: (619) 594-5682 www.scic.org [email protected]
CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM RECORDS SEARCH
Company: Spindrift Archaeological Consulting Company Representative: Arleen Garcia-Herbst Date Processed: 12/1/2016 Project Identification: Villas at San Luis Rey
Search Radius: 1/2 mile
Historical Resources: YES Trinomial and Primary site maps have been reviewed. All sites within the project boundaries and the specified radius of the project area have been plotted. Copies of the site record forms have been included for all recorded sites. Previous Survey Report Boundaries: YES Project boundary maps have been reviewed. National Archaeological Database (NADB) citations for reports within the project boundaries and within the specified radius of the project area have been included. Historic Addresses: YES A map and database of historic properties (formerly Geofinder) has been included. Historic Maps: YES The historic maps on file at the South Coastal Information Center have been reviewed, and copies have been included.
Summary of SHRC Approved CHRIS IC Records Search Elements RSID: 9999 RUSH: no Hours: 1 Spatial Features: 77 Address-Mapped Shapes: yes Digital Database Records: 22 Quads: 1 Aerial Photos: 0 PDFs: Yes PDF Pages: 106
This is not an invoice. Please pay from the monthly billing statement Appendices
TABLE 1. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS WITHIN 0.5-MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT APE
REPORT AUTHOR YEAR REPORT TITLE TYPE OF STUDY NUMBER
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT FOR THE HIGHWAY 76 WIDENING AND NEW ALIGNMENT PROJECT SAN DIEGO DOMINICI, DEBRA ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-00032 1989 COUNTY, 11-SD-76, P.M. R2.41R4.7, 11223-910054, P.M. A. EVALUATION R4.5/R6.2, 11222-010010, P.M. R6.4/R7.2, 11222-10030, P.M. 3.6/4.2, 11222-18403G.
CARRICO, RICHARD AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE ORCHARD ARCHAEOLOGICAL, FIELD SD-00257 1977 CLIFFORD V. CREEK PROJECT OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA. STUDY TAYLOR
CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY AND ASSESSSMENT FOR CARDENAS, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, FIELD SD-00266 1989 THE OCEANSIDE EMERGENCY HOUSING SHELTER (DSC SEAN D. STUDY JOB NO. 89-06).
AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL & HISTORICAL SURVEY OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL, FIELD SD-00440 CHACE, PAUL G. 1977 WILLIAMS PROPERTY (SAN LUIS REY), OCEANSIDE, STUDY CALIFORNIA.
FIRST ADDENDUM ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT CORUM, JOYCE ARCHAEOLOGICAL, FIELD SD-00454 1982 FOR A PROPOSED AUXILIARY LANE EXTENSION IN M. STUDY OCEANSIDE 11-SD-78 0.0/3.1 11206-086121.
CARRILLO, MAP FOR HIGHWAY ALTERNATIVES STUDY 11-SD-76 ARCHAEOLOGICAL, FIELD SD-00577 1982 CHARLES 0.012.9 11821-159021 STUDY
COTTRELL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, FIELD SD-00598 1977 IVY RANCH, SAN LUIS REY, CALIFORNIA MARIE STUDY
SPINDRIFT Appendices
TABLE 1. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS WITHIN 0.5-MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT APE
REPORT AUTHOR YEAR REPORT TITLE TYPE OF STUDY NUMBER
FRANKLIN, RANDY AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT W-1851 AND W- ARCHAEOLOGICAL, FIELD SD-00612 1981 RICHARD 1852 (SDI-6024, SDI-6023) OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA STUDY CARRICO
CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL GALLEGOS, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, FIELD SD-01029 1985 TEST AT SDI-1246, MISSION POINTE PROJECT, OCEANSIDE, DENNIS STUDY CALIFORNIA
FRANKLIN, A PRELIMINATY ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE RANDY AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL, FIELD SD-01070 1978 FOR A PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT IN THE RICHARD L. STUDY LOWER SAN LUIS REY RIVER DRAINAGE. CARRICO
FLOWER, DOUGLAS, ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE MIRA COSTA ARCHAEOLOGICAL, DARCY IKE, SD-01082 1979 ESTATES PROJECT, OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA W- EXCAVATION, FIELD LINDA ROTH, 1256A,B,C,&D W-1257. STUDY AND SUSAN SAPONE VARNER
ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-01130 HECTOR, SUSAN 1985 TEST EXCAVATIONS AT SDI-1246 OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA. EXCAVATION
CARRICO, CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL, FIELD SD-01825 RICHARD AND 1984 MISSION WELL PROJECT OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA STUDY TERRI JACQUES
ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT KELSEY,HARRY MISSION SAN LUIS REY,CALIFORNIA CA-SDI-241 SECTOR C ARCHAEOLOGICAL, AND SD-02189 1991 FOR THE PEYRI ROAD WATER LINE PROJECT(711-85- EVALUATION, FIELD MAGALOUSIS, 7850)OF THE CITY OF OCEANSIDE WATER UTILITIES STUDY NICHOLAS DEPARTMENT
SPINDRIFT Appendices
TABLE 1. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS WITHIN 0.5-MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT APE
REPORT AUTHOR YEAR REPORT TITLE TYPE OF STUDY NUMBER
MAGALOUSIS,NIC MISSION SAN LUIS REY PARISH CENTER AUDITORIUM- ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-02216 HOLAS AND 1991 GYMNASIUM ADDITION CA-SDI-5422 ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION HARRY KELSEY AND HISTORICAL INVESTIGATIONS
ROSEN, MARTIN ARCHAEOLOGICAL, FIELD SD-02448 AND JUDITH 1991 EXTENDED PHASE I INVESTIGATIONS AT CA-SDI-5422 STUDY TORDOFF
EXTENDED PHASE I INVESTIGATION AT SITES CA-SDI-1272, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-02464 CORUM, JOYCE 1990 5445, 5508, AND 7787 11-SD-76 EXCAVATION
PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL TEST EXCAVATION REPORT, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-02465 ROSEN, MARTIN 1990 "THE JONES SITE", CA-SDI- 11687, CITY OF OCEANSIDE, CA EVALUATION, 11-SD-76 EXCAVATION
NEGATIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT FIRST ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-02574 CRAFTS, KAREN 1992 ADDENDUM INTERCHANGE OF ROUTE 78 AND INTERSTATE EVALUATION, FIELD 5 IN OCEANSIDE STUDY
MAGALOUSIS, PRELIMINARY ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-02590 NICHOLAS AND 1992 INVESTIGATIONS AT MISSION SAN LUIS REY CA-SDI-241, EVALUATION, HARRY KILSEY SECTOR D MANAGEMENT/PLANNING
AN HISTORICAL EVALUATION OF FOUR STRUCTURES ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-03165 GROSS, TIMOTHY 1993 WHELAN RANCH, SITE CA SDI 11470 CITY OF OCEANSIDE, EVALUATION SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
SPINDRIFT Appendices
TABLE 1. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS WITHIN 0.5-MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT APE
REPORT AUTHOR YEAR REPORT TITLE TYPE OF STUDY NUMBER
GROSS, TIMOTHY, MARY ARHAEOLOGICAL TESTING FOR PROPOSED FRIARY ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-03166 ROBBINS-WADE, 1994 MISSION SAN LUIS REY, SDI 241 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, EXCAVATION, FIELD AND RUTH C. CALIFORNIA STUDY HILTER
ROBBINS-WADE, ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES INVENTORY FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL/ SD-03509 MARY AND RUTH 1999 MONARCH POINT PROPERTY, OCEANSIDE, SAN DIEGO HISTORICAL C. ALTER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
EVALUATION OF THE J.P. HIGGINS HOMESTEAD, CA-SDI- BISSELL, 14610H, WITHIN THE PROPOSED GREGORY CANYON ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-03575 1999 RONALD M. LANDFILL STUDY AREA. NEAR PALA, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, EVALUATION CALIFORNIA
WAHOFF, TANYA CULTURAL RESOURCE MONITORING FOR THE SAN DIEGO AND REBECCA SD-03583 1999 GAS & ELECTRIC (SDG&E) C-190 SAIDI TOP 50 RECABLE MANAGEMENT/PLANNING MCCORKLE PROJECT, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APPLE
ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES INVENTORY FOR THE SAN ROBBINS-WADE, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, FIELD SD-03743 1999 LUIS REY ACADEMY PROPERTY, OCEANSIDE, SAN DIEGO MARY STUDY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL GALLEGOS, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-04343 1995 TEST AT SDI-1246, MISSION POINT PROJECT, OCEANSIDE, DENNIS EVALUATION CA
MARTIN, ROSEN EXTENDED PHASE I INVESTIGATIONS AT CA-SDI-5422, CITY SD-04903 AND JUDITH D. 1991 MANAGEMENT/PLANNING OF OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA TORDOFF
SPINDRIFT Appendices
TABLE 1. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS WITHIN 0.5-MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT APE
REPORT AUTHOR YEAR REPORT TITLE TYPE OF STUDY NUMBER
EXTENDED PHASE I INVESTIGATION AT SITES CA-SDI-1272, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, FIELD SD-04905 CORUM, JOYCE 1990 5445,5508, AND 7787 STUDY
PHASE II, ARCHAEOLOGICAL TEST EXCAVATION REPORTS, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-04935 ROSEN, MARTIN 1990 "THE JONES SITE", CA-SDI-11, 687, CITY OF OCEANSIDE EXCAVATION ,CA.
PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL TEST EXCAVATION AT STIE ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-04936 CORUM, JOYCE 1991 CA-SDI-5445, CITY OF OCEANSIDE, CA 11-SD-76 P.M. EXCAVATION R2.4/R7.2
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FOR JULY-AUGUST 1996: SD-05225 TOREN, GEORGE 1996 ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM: THE OTHER RESEARCH LITURGICAL CENTER @ SAN LUIS REY ACADEMY
VAN BUEREN, ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION AND TREATMENT PLAN SD-05304 1995 MANAGEMENT/PLANNING THAD FOR THE JONES RANCH SITE IN OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA
HISTORICAL ARCHITECTURAL SURVEY FOR HIGHWAY 76 SD-05305 SCOTT, GLORIA 1990 WIDENING & NEW ALIGNMENT PROJECT OCEANSIDE, SAN OTHER RESEARCH DIEGO COUNTY
SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY BANK AT 277 NORTH EL CAMINO SD-06082 FORD, DEBORAH 1996 MANAGEMENT/PLANNING REAL ENCINITAS, CALIF. 92024
SPINDRIFT Appendices
TABLE 1. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS WITHIN 0.5-MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT APE
REPORT AUTHOR YEAR REPORT TITLE TYPE OF STUDY NUMBER
ROBBINS-WADE, OCEAN POINT-ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES (AFFINIS ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-06315 1999 MARY JOB NO. 1435) EVALUATION
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT FOR THE HIGHWAY ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-06779 CALTRANS 1989 76 AND NEW ALIGNMENT PROJECT EVALUATION
WESTEC CULTURAL RESOURCE TEST SAMPLING PROGRAM FOR A SERVICES, INC ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-07657 1979 PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT IN THE LOWER AND R.L. EVALUATION SAN LUIS REY RIVER DRAINAGE, OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA FRANKLIN
CARRICO, CULTURAL RESOURCE TEST SAMPLING PROGRAM FOR A ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-08469 RICHARD L. AND 1979 PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT IN THE LOWER EXCAVATION R.L. FRANKLIN SAN LUIS REY RIVER DRAINAGE, OCEANSIDE, CA
HAMPSON, R. ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL INVESTIGATIONS SD-08740 PAUL AND 1993 MANAGEMENT/PLANNING FOR THE LITURGICAL CENTER AT SAN LUIS REY ACADEMY PORTIA LEE
AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL SURVEY OF THE SD-08743 CHACE, PAUL G. 1977 N/A WILLIAMS PROPERTY (SAN LUIS REY), OCEANSIDE, CA
MISSION DEL ORO FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-08749 WESTEC 1988 REPORT (T-43-86; D-91-86; H-1-87; Z-21-86;T-44-86; D-92-86) EVALUATION
SPINDRIFT Appendices
TABLE 1. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS WITHIN 0.5-MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT APE
REPORT AUTHOR YEAR REPORT TITLE TYPE OF STUDY NUMBER
CROUTHAMEL, SAN LUIS REY PIONEER CEMETERY: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SD-08884 STEVEN AND 2003 OTHER RESEARCH & HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT, OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA JOEL PAULSON
COOLEY, CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY REPORT FOR FOUR ARCHAEOLOGICAL, THEODORE G. SD-09470 2004 SAN LUIS REY LAND OUTFALL PIPELINE ROUTE EVALUATION, OTHER AND RICHARD L. ALTERNATIVES, CITY OF OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA RESEARCH CARRICO
CATERINO, THE CEMETERIES AND GRAVESTONES OF SAN DIEGO SD-09516 2005 OTHER RESEARCH DAVID COUNTY: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY
ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-11023 VARIOUS MISSION SAN LUIS REY EVALUATION, OTHER RESEARCH
ARCHAEOLOGICAL, ROBBINS-WADE, CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY, THE FELLOWSHIP SD-11134 2007 EVALUATION, OTHER MARY CENTER, OCEANSIDE, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESEARCH
PROBING DAVE JONES' LOCKER: RESULTS OF AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL, VAN BUEREN, SD-11668 2001 INVESTIGATION OF AN ABANDONED WELL AT CA-SDI- EVALUATION, OTHER THAD M. 14410H IN OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA RESEARCH
AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE SUNKEN ARCHAEOLOGICAL, WILLIAMS, JACK SD-12346 2004 GARDENS OF MISSION SAN LUIS REY PART I: SETTING AND EVALUATION, OTHER S. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND RESEARCH
SPINDRIFT Appendices
TABLE 1. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS WITHIN 0.5-MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT APE
REPORT AUTHOR YEAR REPORT TITLE TYPE OF STUDY NUMBER
AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE SUNKEN ARCHAEOLOGICAL, WILLIAMS, JACK SD-12348 2004 GARDENS OF MISSION SAN LUIS REY PART III: THE EVALUATION, OTHER S. ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE SUNKEN GARDENS RESEARCH
ARCHAEOLOGICAL, WILLIAMS, JACK PRESERVATION RECOMMENDATIONS: SUNKEN GARDENS SD-12349 2003 EVALUATION, OTHER S. OF SAN LUIS REY MISSION RESEARCH
ARCHAEOLOGICAL, CITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE MISSION SAN LUIS SD-12350 2005 EVALUATION, OTHER OCEANSIDE REY WATERLINE, OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA RESEARCH
ARCHAEOLOGICAL, HITTLEMAN, MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE MISSION SD-12352 2003 EVALUATION, OTHER JERRY SAN LUIS REY WATERLINE PROJECT RESEARCH
ARCHAEOLOGICAL, WILLIAMS, JACK SAN LUIS REY ARCHAEOLOGY - WATER PIPE PROJECT - SD-12353 2001 EVALUATION, OTHER S. CA-SDI-241 - PRELIMINARY FINDINGS RESEARCH
HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE THOMAS & MARY ARCHAEOLOGICAL, MOOMJIAN, SD-12437 2009 MCCUTCHEON / ANGEL HOUSE 15880 VIA DEL ALBA, EVALUATION, OTHER SCOTT A. RANCHO SANTA FE, CALIFORNIA 92067 RESEARCH
ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT ADDENDUM TO: ARCHAEOLOGICAL, UNDERWOOD, FINAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING FOR THE MISSION SAN SD-12683 2009 EVALUATION, OTHER JACKSON LUIS REY WATERLINE PROJECT, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, RESEARCH CALIFORNIA
SPINDRIFT Appendices
TABLE 1. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS WITHIN 0.5-MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT APE
REPORT AUTHOR YEAR REPORT TITLE TYPE OF STUDY NUMBER
GREENWOOD ARCHAEOLOGICAL, OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SPORTS COURTS AND SD-12982 AND 2011 EVALUATION, OTHER PARKING LOTS, ARCHAEOLOGICAL ELEMENT REVIEW ASSOCIATES RESEARCH
ARCHAEOLOGICAL, ROBBINS-WADE, OCEAN POINT- ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES (AFFINIS SD-13815 1999 EVALUATION, OTHER MARY JOB NO. 1435) RESEARCH
ARCHAEOLOGICAL, ROBBINS-WADE, SD-14015 2011 OCEANPOINTE CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY EVALUATION, OTHER MARY RESEARCH
CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCE STUDY FOR THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL, NI GHABHLAIN, CITY OF OCEANSIDE GENERAL PLAN- CIRCULATION SD-14069 2011 EVALUATION, OTHER SINEAD ELEMENT UPDATE PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT RESEARCH REPORT (PEIR)
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, MARY ROBBINS- SD-15421 2013 MISSION/ACADEMY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN, EVALUATION, WADE OCEANSIDE, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. MANAGEMENT/PLANNING
MARY ROBBINS- VILLA STORIA PROJECT, CULTURAL RESOURCES ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SD-15895 WADE AND 2015 ASSESSMENT: CA-SDI-5422 EVALUATION ANDREW GILETTI
SPINDRIFT Appendices
TABLE 2. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED SITES WITHIN 0.5-MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT APE
SITE IDENTIFIER PREHISTORIC OR HISTORIC REPORT REFERENCE WITHIN PROJECT SITE
SD-02189, SD-02216, SD-02590, HISTORIC MISSION SAN LUIS REY DE SD-03125, SD-03166, SD-03249, P-37-000241 FRANCIA YES SD-05225, SD-06091, SD-06779, (LISTED ON NATIONAL REGISTER) SD-12353, SD-12982, SD-13805
P-37-001283 PREHISTORIC HABITATION SITE N/A NO
SD-00032, SD-00266, SD-00612, SD-01070, SD-01099, SD-02216, SD-02448, SD-02970, SD-03125, P-37-005422 HISTORIC DEPOSIT NO SD-03583, SD-03743, SD-05203, SD-05225, SD-06779, SD-07410, SD-11023, SD-12982, SD-13805
P-37-006023 HISTORIC FOUNDATION AND WELL/CISTERN SD-00612, SD-06779 NO
P-37-010078 HISTORIC WALLS SD-06779, SD-07410 NO
P-37-010079 PREHISTORIC LITHIC AND SHELL SCATTER SD-06779 NO
P-37-010080 PREHISTORIC HABITATION SITE SD-06779 NO
P-37-011461 HISTORIC WALL SD-00032 NO
HISTORIC CEMETERY AND PREHISTORIC P-37-011462 SD-00032, SD-06764, SD-06779 NO SHELL SCATTER
SD-02465, SD-04935, SD-05203, P-37-011687 PREHISTORIC HABITATION SITE NO SD-05304, SD-05786, SD-14069
HISTORIC AND PREHISTORIC ARTIFACT P-37-011961 SD-07410 NO SCATTER
P-37-014928 PREHISTORIC ISOLATED ARTIFACT (FLAKE) N/A NO
P-37-015694 HISTORIC RANCH SD-11668, SD-14069 NO
HISTORIC MISSION SAN LUIS REY DE P-37-024344 FRANCIA N/A NO (LISTED ON NATIONAL REGISTER)
SPINDRIFT Appendices
APPENDIX B
SPINDRIFT Native American Contacts Villas at Mission San Luis Rey Project 2016-011, San Diego County
Date Contacted Response Name Affiliation Comments Received? 1. Letter 2. Phone 3. Phone
10/06/2016 Rec’d response letter from NAHC, No Native American Heritage Commission 10/04/2016 N/A N/A Yes Tribal Cultural Resources have been recorded in 1550 Harbor Blvd N/A Email Project Area Sacramento, CA 95814
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Jeff Grubba, Chairperson 5401 Dinah Shore Drive Cahuilla 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: AGH received message that fax was N/A N/A No Palm Springs, CA, 92264 Luiseno Fax successfully received. Phone: (760) 699 - 6800 Fax: (760) 699-6919
10/18/2016: AGH received message “Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: ACBCl- [email protected]. Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain aguacaliente.net by mail.aguacaliente.net. [74.62.3.24]. The error that Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians the other server returned was: 554 Unknown Patricia Garcia-Plotkin, Director 10/18/2016 Recipient (#5.1.1)” 5401 Dinah Shore Drive Cahuilla Email 10/18/2016: AGH received message that fax was Palm Springs, CA, 92264 N/A N/A Yes Luiseno 10/18/2016 successfully received. Phone: (760) 699 – 6907 Fax 10/21/2016: AGH received an email from Victoria Fax: (760) 699-6924 Harvey ACBCI Archaeological Monitoring [email protected] Coordinator. It stated “Thank you for including us in the consultation process for this project. However, a records check of the ACBCI cultural registry revealed that this project is not located within the Tribe’s Traditional Use Area (TUA). Therefore, we defer to the other tribes in the area. This letter shall conclude our consultation efforts.”
Page 1 of 8 Native American Contacts Villas at Mission San Luis Rey Project 2016-011, San Diego County
Date Contacted Response Name Affiliation Comments Received? 1. Letter 2. Phone 3. Phone
Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Clifford LaChappa, Chairperson 1095 Barona Road 10/18/2016 Lakeside, CA, 92040 Kumeyaay N/A N/A No Email Phone: (619)443-6612 Fax: (619)443-0681 [email protected] Campo Band of Mission Indians Ralph Goff, Chairperson 36190 Church Road, Suite 1 10/18/2016 Campo, CA, 91906 Kumeyaay N/A N/A No Email Phone: (619)478-9046 Fax: (619)478-5818 [email protected]
Ewiiaapaayp Tribal Office Robert Pinto, Chairperson 4054 Willows Road 10/18/2016 10/06/2016: AGH received message that fax was Kumeyaay N/A N/A No Alpine, CA, 91901 Fax successfully received. Phone: (619)445-6315 Fax: (619)445-9126
Ewiiaapaayp Tribal Office Michael Garcia, Vice Chairperson 4054 Willows Road 10/18/2016 Alpine, CA, 91901 Kumeyaay N/A N/A No Email Phone: (619)445-6315 Fax: (619)445-9126 [email protected]
Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel Virgil Perez, Chairperson 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: AGH received message that fax was not P.O. Box 130 Fax successfully received. Reason: No Answer. Kumeyaay N/A N/A No Santa Ysabel, CA, 92070 10/19/2016 10/24/2016: Certified mailing was received and Phone: (760)765-0845 Certified Mail signed for by Donna Levine. Fax: (760)765-0320
Page 2 of 8 Native American Contacts Villas at Mission San Luis Rey Project 2016-011, San Diego County
Date Contacted Response Name Affiliation Comments Received? 1. Letter 2. Phone 3. Phone
lnaja Band of Mission Indians Rebecca Osuna, Chairperson 2005 S. Escondido Blvd. 10/18/2016 10/06/2016: AGH received message that fax was Kumeyaay N/A N/A No Escondido, CA, 92025 Fax successfully received. Phone: (760)737-7628 Fax: (760)747-8568
Jamul Indian Village Erica Pinto, Chairperson P.O. Box812 10/18/2016 10/06/2016: AGH received message that fax was Kumeyaay N/A N/A No Jamul, CA, 91935 Fax successfully received. Phone: (619)669-4785 Fax: (619)669-4817
Kwaaymii Laguna Band of Mission Indians Carmen Lucas 10/19/2016 10/24/2016: Certified mailing was received and P.O. Box775 Kumeyaay N/A N/A No Certified mail signed for by Lucas. Pine Valley, CA, 91962 Phone: (619)709-4207
La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians Thomas Rodriguez, Chairperson 10/19/2016 No date: Certified mailing was received and signed 22000 Highway 76 Luiseno N/A N/A No Certified mail for by Angela Miner. Pauma Valley, CA, 92061 Phone: (760)742-3771
La Posta Band of Mission Indians Gwendolyn Parada, Chairperson 8 Crestwood Road Kumeyaay 10/18/2016 Boulevard, CA, 91905 N/A N/A No Email Phone: (619)478-2113 Fax: (619)478-2125 [email protected]
Page 3 of 8 Native American Contacts Villas at Mission San Luis Rey Project 2016-011, San Diego County
Date Contacted Response Name Affiliation Comments Received? 1. Letter 2. Phone 3. Phone
10/18/2016: AGH received message “Delivery to the La Posta Band of Mission Indians following recipient failed permanently: Javaughn Miller, Tribal Administrator [email protected]. Technical details of 10/18/2016 8 Crestwood Road permanent failure:DNS Error: 7279536 DNS type Kumeyaay Email Boulevard, CA, 91905 N/A N/A No 'mx' lookup of lapostatribe.net responded with code 10/18/2016 Phone: (619)478-2113 NXDOMAIN. Domain name not found: Fax Fax: (619)478-2125 lapostatribe.net”. Sent by fax instead. [email protected] 10/18/2016: AGH received message that fax was successfully received.
Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Nation Angela Elliott Santos, Chairperson P.O. Box 1302 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: AGH received message that fax was Kumeyaay N/A N/A No Boulevard, CA, 91905 Fax successfully received. Phone: (619) 766-4930 Fax: (619) 766-4957
Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Nation Nick Elliott, Cultural Resources Coordinator P. 0. Box 1302 10/18/2016 Kumeyaay N/A N/A No Boulevard, CA, 91905 Email Phone: (619) 766 - 4930 Fax: (619) 766-4957 [email protected]
Mesa Grande Band of Mission Indians Virgil Oyos, Chairperson P.O Box 270 10/18/2016 Santa Ysabel, CA, 92070 Kumeyaay N/A N/A No Email Phone: (760)782-3818 Fax: (760)782-9092 [email protected]
Page 4 of 8 Native American Contacts Villas at Mission San Luis Rey Project 2016-011, San Diego County
Date Contacted Response Name Affiliation Comments Received? 1. Letter 2. Phone 3. Phone
10/31/2016: AGH received a letter from Gaughen. The letter stated “We have consulted our maps and determined that the project as described is not within the boundaries of the recognized Pala Indian Reservation. It is, however, within the boundaries of the territory that the tribe considers its Traditional Pala Band of Mission Indians Use Area (TUA). Therefore, we request to be kept in Shasta Gaughan, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer the information loop as the project progresses and PMB 50, 35008 Pala Temecula Rd. Cupeno 10/18/2016 would appreciate being maintained on the receiving Pala, CA, 92059 N/A N/A Yes Luiseno Email list for project updates, reports of investigations, Phone: (760) 891 - 3515 and/or any documentation that might be generated Fax: (760) 742-3189 regarding previously reported or newly discovered [email protected] sites. Further, recommend archaeological monitoring given the proximity of known cultural and historic resources. If the project boundaries are modified to extend beyond the currently proposed limits, we request updated information and the opportunity to respond to your changes.”
Pauma Band of Luiseno Indians - Pauma & Yuima Reservation Temet Aguilar, Chairperson 10/18/2016 10/18/2016: AGH received message that fax was P.O. Box 369, Ext. 303 Luiseno N/A N/A No Fax successfully received. Pauma Valley, CA, 92061 Phone: (760)742-1289 Fax: (760)742-3422 Pechanga Band of Mission Indians Mark Macarro, Chairperson P.O. Box 1477 10/18/2016 Temecula, CA, 92593 Luiseno N/A N/A No Email Phone: (951) 770 - 6000 Fax: (951) 695-1778 [email protected] Pechanga Band of Mission Indians Paul Macarro, Cultural Resources Manager P.O. Box 1477 10/18/2016 Temecula, CA, 92593 Luiseno N/A N/A No Email Phone: (951) 770-8100 Fax: (951) 506-9491 [email protected]
Page 5 of 8 Native American Contacts Villas at Mission San Luis Rey Project 2016-011, San Diego County
Date Contacted Response Name Affiliation Comments Received? 1. Letter 2. Phone 3. Phone
Pechanga Band of Mission Indians Anna Hoover, Cultural Analyst P.O. Box 2183 10/18/2016 Temecula, CA, 92593 Luiseno N/A N/A No Email Phone: (951) 770- 8104 Fax: (951) 694-0446 [email protected] Rincon Band of Mission Indians Bo Mazzetti, Chairperson 1 West Tribal Road 10/18/2016 Valley Center, CA, 92082 Luiseno N/A N/A No Email Phone: (760)749-1051 Fax: (760)749-5144 [email protected] Rincon Band of Mission Indians Jim McPherson, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer 1 West Tribal Road 10/18/2016 Valley Center, CA, 92082 Luiseno N/A N/A No Email Phone: (760)749-1051 Fax: (760)749-5144 [email protected] San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians San Luis Rey, Tribal Council 1889 Sunset Drive 10/18/2016 Vista, CA, 92081 Luiseno N/A N/A No Email Phone: (760)724-8505 Fax: (760)724-2172 [email protected]
San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians 1889 Sunset Drive 10/18/2016: AGH notes that this is a duplicate entry Vista, CA, 92081 10/18/2016 Luiseno N/A N/A No from the previous page but included it to match the Phone: (760) 724 - 8505 Email NAHC tribal contact list as provided. Fax: (760) 724-2172 [email protected]
Page 6 of 8 Native American Contacts Villas at Mission San Luis Rey Project 2016-011, San Diego County
Date Contacted Response Name Affiliation Comments Received? 1. Letter 2. Phone 3. Phone
San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians Allen E. Lawson, Chairperson P.O. Box 365 10/18/2016 Valley Center, CA, 92082 Kumeyaay N/A N/A No Email Phone: (760)749-3200 Fax: (760)749-3876 [email protected]
San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians John Flores, Environmental Coordinator P. 0. Box 365 10/18/2016 Valley Center, CA, 92082 Kumeyaay N/A N/A No Email Phone: (760) 749 - 3200 Fax: (760) 749-3876 [email protected]
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Carrie Garcia, Cultural Resources Manager P. 0. Box 487 Cahuilla 10/18/2016 San Jacinto, CA, 92583 N/A N/A No Luiseno Email Phone: (951 )654-2765 Fax: (951 )654-4198 [email protected] Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural Resource Department P.O. BOX487 Cahuilla 10/18/2016 San Jacinto, CA, 92581 N/A N/A No Luiseno Email Phone: (951 )663-5279 Fax: (951 )654-4198 [email protected] Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Rosemary Morillo, Chairperson P. 0. Box 487 Cahuilla 10/18/2016 San Jacinto, CA, 92583 N/A N/A No Luiseno Email Phone: (951) 654- 2765 Fax: (951) 654-4198 [email protected]
Page 7 of 8 Native American Contacts Villas at Mission San Luis Rey Project 2016-011, San Diego County
Date Contacted Response Name Affiliation Comments Received? 1. Letter 2. Phone 3. Phone
Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation Cody J. Martinez, Chairperson 1 Kwaaypaay Court 10/18/2016 El Cajon, CA, 92019 Kumeyaay N/A N/A No Email Phone: (619)445-2613 Fax: (619)445-1927 [email protected]
Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation Lisa Haws, Cultural Resources Manager 1 Kwaaypaay Court Kumeyaay 10/18/2016 Kumeyaay N/A N/A No El Cajon, CA, 92019 Email Phone: (619) 445 – 4564 [email protected]
Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians Robert J. Welch, Chairperson 1 Viejas Grade Road 10/18/2016 Alpine, CA, 91901 Kumeyaay N/A N/A No Email Phone: (619)445-381 O Fax: (619)445-5337 [email protected] Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians Julie Hagen, 1 Viejas Grade Road 10/18/2016 Alpine, CA, 91901 Kumeyaay N/A N/A No Email Phone: (619) 445 - 3810 Fax: (619) 445-5337 [email protected]
Page 8 of 8 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Edmund G Brown Jr Governor
NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION 1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 100 West Sacramento, CA 95691 (916) 373-3710 Fax (916) 373-5471
October 6, 2016
Arleen Garcia-Herbst Spindrift Archaeology
Sent by E-mail: Arleen @spindriftarchaeology.com
RE: Proposed Villas at Mission San Luis Rey Project, City of Oceanside; San Luis Rey USGS Quadrangle, San Diego County, California
Dear Ms. Garcia-Herbst:
A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File was completed for the area of potential project effect (APE) referenced above with negative results. Please note that the absence of specific site information in the Sacred Lands File does not indicate the absence of Native American cultural resources in any APE.
Attached is a list of tribes culturally affiliated to the project area. I suggest you contact all of the listed Tribes. If they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. The list should provide a starting place to locate areas of potential adverse impact within the APE. By contacting all those on the list, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the NAHC requests that you follow-up with a telephone call to ensure that the project information has been received.
If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from any of these individuals or groups, please notify me. With your assistance we are able to assure that our lists contain current information. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact via email: [email protected].
Sincerely, ffexu-~~ (j~ ,~?:ton , M.A., PhD. Associate Governmental Program Analyst Native American Heritage Commission Native American Contact List San Diego County 1016/2016
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla lipay Nation of Santa Ysabel Indians Virgil Perez, Chairperson Jeff Grubba, Chairperson P.O. Box 130 Kumeyaay 5401 Dinah Shore Drive Cahuilla Santa Ysabel, CA, 92070 Palm Springs, CA, 92264 Luiseno Phone: (760)765-0845 Phone: (760) 699 - 6800 Fax: (760)765-0320 Fax: (760) 699-6919
lipay Nation of Santa Ysabel Agua Caliente Band of Cahui/la Clint Linton, Director of Cultural Indians Resources Patricia Garcia-Plotkin, Director P.O. Box507 Kumeyaay 5401 Dinah Shore Drive Cahuilla Santa Ysabel, CA, 92070 Palm Springs, CA, 92264 Luiseno Phone: (760) 803 - 5694 Phone: (760) 699 - 6907 [email protected] Fax: (760) 699-6924 [email protected] lnaja Band of Mission lncfians Rebecca Osuna, Chairperson Barona Group of the Capitan 2005 S. Escondido Blvd. Kumeyaay Grande Escondido, CA, 92025 Clifford LaChappa, Chairperson Phone: (760)737-7628 1095 Barona Road Kumeyaay Fax: (760)747-8568 Lakeside, CA, 92040 Phone: (619)443-6612 Fax: (619)443-0681 Jamul Indian Village [email protected] Erica Pinto, Chairperson P.O. Box 612 Kumeyaay Campo Band of Mission Indians Jamul, CA, 91935 Ralph Goff, Chairperson Phone: (619)669-4785 36190 Church Road, Suite 1 Kumeyaay Fax: (619)669-4817 Campo, CA, 91906 Phone: (619)478-9046 Fax: (619)478-5818 Kwaaymii Laguna Band of [email protected] Mission Indians Carmen Lucas, Ewiiaapaayp Tribal Office P.O. Box 775 Kumeyaay Robert Pinto, Chairperson Pine Valley, CA, 91962 4054 Willows Road Kumeyaay Phone: (619)709-4207 Alpine, CA, 91901 Phone: (619)445-6315 Fax: (619)445-9126 La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians Thomas Rodriguez, Chairperson Ewiiaapaayp Tribal Office 22000 Highway 76 Luiseno Michael Garcia, Vice Chairperson Pauma Valley, CA, 92061 4054 Willows Road Kumeyaay Phone: (760)742-3771 Alpine, CA, 91901 Phone: (619) 445- 6315 Fax: (619) 445-9126 [email protected]
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined Jn Section 7050.5 of the l-lealth and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.
Thls list ls only applicable for contacting local Native Amari cans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Villas at Mission San Luis Rey, San Diego County.
PROJ-002482 10/06/2016 01:59 PM 1of4 Native American Heritage Commission Native American Contact List San Diego County 10/612016
La Pasta Band of Mission Pala Band of Mission Indians Indians Shasta Gaughan, Tribal Historic Gwendolyn Parada, Chairperson Preservation Officer 8 Crestwood Road Kumeyaay PMB 50, 35008 Pala Temecula Cupeno Boulevard, CA, 91905 Rd. Luiseno Phone: (619)478-2113 Pala, CA, 92059 Fax: (619)478-2125 Phone: (760) 891 - 3515 [email protected] Fax: (760) 742-3189 [email protected] La Posta Band of Mission Indians Pauma Band of Luiseno Indians Javaughn Miller, Tribal - Pauma & Yuima Reservation Administrator Temet Aguilar, Chairperson 8 Crestwood Road Kumeyaay P.O. Box 369, Ext. 303 Luiseno Boulevard, CA, 91905 Pauma Valley, CA, 92061 Phone: (619)478-2113 Phone: (760)742-1289 Fax: (619)478-2125 Fax: (760)742-3422 [email protected]
Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Pechanga Band of Mission Nation Indians Angela Elliott Santos, Chairperson Mark Macarro, Chairperson P.O. Box 1302 Kumeyaay P.O. Box 1477 Luise no Boulevard, CA, 91905 Temecula, CA, 92593 Phone: (619) 766 - 4930 Phone: (951) 770 - 6000 Fax: (619) 766-4957 Fax: (951) 695-1778 [email protected]
Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Pechanga Band of Mission Nation Indians Nick Elliott, Cultural Resources Paul Macarro, Cultural Resources Coordinator Manager P. 0. Box 1302 Kumeyaay P.O. Box 1477 Luiseno Boulevard, CA, 91905 Temecula, CA, 92593 Phone: (619) 766 - 4930 Phone: (951) 770-8100 Fax: (619) 766-4957 Fax: (951) 506-9491 [email protected] [email protected]
Mesa Grande Band of Mission Pechanga Band of Mission Indians Indians Virgil Oyos, Chairperson Anna Hoover, Cultural Analyst P.O Box 270 Kumeyaay P. o. Box 2183 Luiseno Santa Ysabel, CA, 92070 Temecula, CA, 92593 Phone: (760)782-3818 Phone: (951) 770- 8104 Fax: (760)782-9092 Fax: (951) 694-0446 [email protected] [email protected]
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of th!s list does not relteve any person of statutory responsibility as defined In Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.
This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Villas at Mission San Luis Rey, San Diego County.
PROJ-002482 10/06/2016 01:59 PM 2 of 4 Native American Heritage Commission Native American Contact List San Diego County 1016/2016
Rincon Band of Mission Indians San Pasqual Band of Mission Bo Mazzetti, Chairperson Indians 1 West Tribal Road Luise no John Flores, Environmental Valley Center, CA, 92082 Coordinator Phone: (760)749-1051 P. 0. Box 365 Kumeyaay Fax: (760)749-5144 Valley Center, CA, 92082 [email protected] Phone: (760) 749 - 3200 Fax: (760) 749-3876 Rincon Band of Mission Indians [email protected] Jim McPherson, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Soboba Band of Luiseno 1 West Tribal Road Luiseno Indians Valley Center, CA, 92082 Carrie Garcia, Cultural Resources Phone: (760)749-1051 Manager Fax: (760)749-5144 P. 0. Box 487 Cahuilla [email protected] San Jacinto, CA, 92583 Luiseno Phone: (951 )654-2765 San Luis Rey Band of Mission Fax: (951 )654-4198 Indians [email protected] San Luis Rey, Tribal Council 1889 Sunset Drive Luise no Soboba Band of Luiseno Vista, CA, 92081 Indians Phone: (760)724-8505 Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural Fax: (760)724-2172 Resource Department [email protected] P.O. BOX487 Cahuilla San Jacinto, CA, 92581 Luise no San Luis Rey Band of Mission Phone: (951 )663-5279 Indians Fax: (951 )654-4198 1889 Sunset Drive Luiseno [email protected] Vista, CA, 92081 Phone: (760) 724 - 8505 Soboba Band of Luiseno Fax: (760) 724-2172 Indians [email protected] Rosemary Morillo, Chairperson P. 0. Box 487 Cahuilla San Pasqual Band of Mission San Jacinto, CA, 92583 Luiseno Indians Phone: (951) 654- 2765 Allen E. Lawson, Chairperson Fax: (951) 654-4198 P.O. Box365 Kumeyaay [email protected] Valley Center, CA, 92082 Phone: (760)749-3200 Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Fax: (760)749-3876 Nation [email protected] Cody J. Martinez, Chairperson 1 Kwaaypaay Court Kumeyaay El Cajon, CA, 92019 Phone: (619)445-2613 Fax: (619)445-1927 [email protected]
This llst is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of lhe Pub!fc Resource Seclion 5097.98 ot the Public Resources Code.
T~is list ls only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Villas at Mission San Luis Rey, San Diego County.
PROJ-002482 10/06/2016 01:59 PM 3 of 4 Native American Heritage Commission Native American Contact List San Diego County 10/6/2016
Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation Lisa Haws, Cultural Resources Manager 1 Kwaaypaay Court Kumeyaay El Cajon, CA, 92019 Phone: (619) 445 - 4564
Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians Robert J. Welch, Chairperson 1 Viejas Grade Road Kumeyaay Alpine, CA, 91901 Phone: (619)445-3810 Fax: (619)445-5337 [email protected]
Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians Julie Hagen, 1 Viejas Grade Road Kumeyaay Alpine, CA, 91901 Phone: (619) 445 - 3810 Fax: (619) 445-5337 [email protected]
This list Is current only as of the dale of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Seelion 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Pub He Resource Section 5097.98 ol lhe Public Resources Code.
This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cullural resources assessment for the proposed Villas at Mission San Luis Rey, San Diego County.
PROJ-002482 10/06/2016 01:59 PM 4 of 4 Arleen Garcia-Herbst
The Villas at Mission San Luis Rey Project (Spindrift Proj No. 2016-011) 1 message
THPO Consulting
Hello, Arleen,
Thank you for including us in the consultation process for this project. However, a records check of the ACBCI cultural registry revealed that this project is not located within the Tribe’s Traditional Use Area (TUA). Therefore, we defer to the other tribes in the area. This letter shall conclude our consultation efforts.
Have a nice weekend,
Victoria Harvey M.A., R.P.A.
Archaeological Monitoring Coordinator
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians
760-699-6981 (Desk)
(760) 406-1909 (Cell)
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer PALA TRIBAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
PMB 50, 35008 Pala Temecula Road Pala, CA 92059 760-891-3510 Office | 760-742-3189 Fax
October 31, 2016
Arleen Garcia-Herbst Spindrift Archaeological Consulting 8895 Towne Centre Drive #105-248 San Diego, CA 92122
Re: Villas at Mission San Luis Rey Project
Dear Mrs. Garcia-Herbst:
The Pala Band of Mission Indians Tribal Historic Preservation Office has received your notification of the project referenced above. This letter constitutes our response on behalf of Robert Smith, Tribal Chairman.
We have consulted our maps and determined that the project as described is not within the boundaries of the recognized Pala Indian Reservation. It is, however, within the boundaries of the territory that the tribe considers its Traditional Use Area (TUA). Therefore, we request to be kept in the information loop as the project progresses and would appreciate being maintained on the receiving list for project updates, reports of investigations, and/or any documentation that might be generated regarding previously reported or newly discovered sites. Further, recommend archaeological monitoring given the proximity of known cultural and historic resources. If the project boundaries are modified to extend beyond the currently proposed limits, we request updated information and the opportunity to respond to your changes.
We appreciate involvement with your initiative and look forward to working with you on future efforts. If you have questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me by telephone at 760-891-3515 or by e-mail at [email protected].
Sincerely,
Shasta C. Gaughen, Ph.D. Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Pala Band of Mission Indians
ATTENTION: THE PALA TRIBAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL REQUESTS FOR CONSULTATION. PLEASE ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE TO SHASTA C. GAUGHEN AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS. IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO ALSO SEND NOTICES TO PALA TRIBAL CHAIRMAN ROBERT SMITH.
Consultation letter 2a Appendices
APPENDIX C
SPINDRIFT PHOTOGRAPH RECORD
Page 1 of 4 Project Name: Villa at Mission SLR Project Year 2016 Camera Format: Digital Lens Size: N/A Film Type/Speed: N/A Negatives Kept at: Spindrift Archaeological Consulting
Mo. Day Photo Frame Subject/Description View Toward Accession #
Start of Transect 1, Mission Ave in Looking 12 20 1 457 background. North 12 20 2 458 Modern trash under pepper tree Close up
12 20 3 459 Quartz rock, gravel, and trash Close up 12 20 4 460 Rodent holes Close up
12 20 5 461 Shell. Close up 12 20 6 462 Chert Debitage Close up 12 20 7 463 same chert debitage Close up
12 20 8 464 same chert debitage close up 12 20 9 465 same chert debitage Close up
20 Looking 12 10 466 end of Transect 1 South
20 Looking 12 11 467 Start of Transect 2. South
20 Looking 12 12 468 Modern trash/ homeless settlement North/west
12 20 13 469 Bone fragment Close up 12 20 14 470 same bone fragment Close up 12 20 15 471 same bone fragment Close up
20 Looking 12 16 472 end of Transect 2 North
20 Looking 12 17 473 end of Transect 2 North
20 Looking 12 18 474 Overview of Project area North
20 Looking 12 19 475 Start of Transect 3 North
20 Bone fragment near last one in picture 12 20 476 Close up 13
20 Looking 12 21 477 End of Transect 3 South
20 Looking 12 22 478 Start of Transect 4 South 20 Looking 12 23 479 overview of Project area South
12 20 24 480 Grass coverage in Center of Project Close up
DPR 523i (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) PHOTOGRAPH RECORD
Page 2 of 4 Project Name: Villa at Mission SLR Project Year 2016 Mo. Day Photo Frame Subject/Description View Toward Accession # area (showing visibility)
20 Overview of Project area from center of Looking 12 25 481 Project area North
20 Overview of Project area from center of Looking 12 26 482 Project area North/west
20 Overview of Project area from center of Looking 12 27 483 Project area South/west
20 Overview of Project area from center of Looking 12 28 484 Project area South
20 Overview of Project area from center of Looking 12 29 485 Project area South/east 20 Overview of Project area from center of Looking 12 30 486 Project area East
20 Overview of Project area from center of Looking 12 31 487 Project area North/east
12 20 32 488 Soil in non-grassed area sample Close up
20 Looking 12 33 489 Start of Transect 5 North
12 20 34 490 Chione spp. Shell Close up 12 20 35 491 Metavolcanic debitage fragment Close up
Metavolcanic debitage fragment, same 12 20 36 492 Close up one
12 20 37 493 Milk glass fragment Close up
12 20 38 494 Prehistoric ceramic, Brown ware Close up 12 20 39 495 same ceramic Close up
Looking 12 20 40 496 End of transect 5 South
Looking 12 20 41 497 Start of Transect 6 South
Looking 12 20 42 498 End of Transect 6 North Looking 12 20 43 499 Start of Transect 7 North
12 20 44 500 Brown ware, Prehistoric Ceramic Close up
Brown ware, Prehistoric Ceramic, same 12 20 45 501 Close up one
another picture of the ceramic (same 12 20 46 502 close up one)
12 20 47 503 Another Prehistoric ceramic , brown Close up
DPR 523i (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) PHOTOGRAPH RECORD
Page 3 of 4 Project Name: Villa at Mission SLR Project Year 2016 Mo. Day Photo Frame Subject/Description View Toward Accession # ware, fragment
Looking 12 20 48 504 End of Transect 7 south
12 20 49 505 Prehistoric ceramic, Brown ware Close up 12 20 50 506 same ceramic fragment Close up
Looking 12 20 51 507 Mission overview South/west
12 20 52 508 same same
12 20 53 509 same same
Brown ware, Prehistoric ceramic and 12 20 54 510 Close up brick
Looking 12 20 55 511 Start of Transect 8 North 12 20 56 512 Ceramic , brown ware Close up
Looking 12 20 57 513 End of Transect 8 South
Looking 12 20 58 514 Start of Transect 9 South
Looking 12 20 59 515 End of Transect 9 North
12 20 60 516 Chione spp. Shell close up 12 20 61 517 Brick close up
12 20 62 518 Another shell near last one Close up 12 20 63 519 Shell Close up 12 20 64 520 Shell, same one Close up
12 20 65 521 Chione spp. Shell Close up 12 20 66 522 Overview off site of Project area North/west
Looking 12 20 67 523 Start of Transect 10 South
Looking 12 20 68 524 Start of Transect 10 pass pile of brush South
12 20 69 525 Two ceramic fragments Close up 12 20 70 526 Another ceramic in the same location Close up
12 20 71 527 And another piece of brown ware Close up
Yet another ceramic found in the same 12 20 72 528 Close up general location
DPR 523i (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) PHOTOGRAPH RECORD
Page 4 of 4 Project Name: Villa at Mission SLR Project Year 2016 Mo. Day Photo Frame Subject/Description View Toward Accession #
Another ceramic fragment found in the 12 20 73 529 Close up same location
Looking 12 20 74 530 End of Transect 10 North
DPR 523i (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)