DOCSLIB.ORG

Muckraking Goes Global: the Future of Cross-Border Investigative

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Muckraking Goes Global: the Future of Cross-Border Investigative Copyright Copyright © 2013 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College All rights reserved Published by One Francis Ave. Cambridge, MA 02138 Adapted from the Spring 2013 issue of Nieman Reports The Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard has published this e-book in both English and Spanish to coincide with the 2013 Global Investigative Journalism Conference in Rio de Janeiro on October 12 – 15. The conference is a joint effort of the Global Investigative Journalism Network, the Latin American Conference on Investigative Journalism, and the Brazilian Association of Investigative Journalism. Translators: Patricia Torres Londoño and Erin Goodman Spanish Copy Editor: Sandra Rodríguez Nieto The Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard educates leaders in journalism and elevates the standards of the profession through special programs that convene scholars and experts in all fields. More than 1,400 accomplished and promising journalists from 92 countries have been awarded Nieman Fellowships since 1938. In addition to the Nieman Watchdog Project, which aims to examine and invigorate journalism in its fundamental role of serving the public interest, the foundation's other initiatives include Nieman Reports, a quarterly print and online magazine that explores contemporary challenges and opportunities in journalism; Nieman Journalism Lab, a website that reports on the future of news, innovation and best practices in the digital media age; and Nieman Storyboard, a website that showcases exceptional narrative journalism and explores the future of nonfiction storytelling. English Investigative Reporting's International Impact Cross-border investigative journalism collaboration has achieved a lot, but its full potential is yet to be realized By Charles Lewis As an estimated 1,200 people from over 100 countries gather in Rio de Janeiro for what veteran Brazilian journalist and director of the Knight Center for Journalism in the Americas Rosental Alves has called the “World Cup of investigative journalism,” it is fitting to reflect upon how such international collaboration and exuberance for investigating the uses and abuses of power came to be —and where it is going. This is the latest manifestation of exciting, dynamic, synergistic phenomena that actually began long ago. As we come together for the single largest and most international gathering of investigative reporters and editors ever held, with appreciation and humility, let us not forget that this is just the latest milestone in the continuum of experience, knowledge and understanding. South America’s largest country will host the simultaneous confluence of no fewer than three major conferences—the eighth Global Investigative Journalism Network conference, the fifth Latin American Conference on Investigative Journalism, and the eighth International Congress of the Brazilian Congress of the Brazilian Association of Investigative Journalism. All of these organizations are recent, 21st-century phenomena. The global investigative journalism conferences were the brainchild of Brant Houston, who was then executive director of Investigative Reporters and Editors (IRE), the oldest and largest such membership and training organization in the world, and respected journalist Nils Mulvad, co-founder and former executive director of the Danish Institute for Computer Assisted Reporting (DICAR). They envisioned multi-day, multi-panel, locally hosted Global Investigative Journalism conferences as a means for reporters to “increase cross-border cooperation.” Such conferences were subsequently held in Copenhagen, Denmark in 2001 and 2003, Amsterdam, the Netherlands in 2005 (460 journalists from 55 countries; attendance rising with each conference), Toronto, Canada in 2007, Lillehammer, Norway in 2008, Geneva, Switzerland in 2010 and Kiev, Ukraine in 2011. I have attended and spoken at six out of seven of those. In early 2012, a “secretariat” to “better manage the GIJN’s conferences and increase its capacity to support investigative journalism around the world” was created by the various voting delegates, and today it is directed by veteran U.S. journalist David Kaplan. Of course, reporters and editors have long combined their resources and their energies, talents and sources in covering significant public issues. For example, enabled by the invention of the telegraph, in 1846 five U.S. newspapers formed the Associated Press, a nonprofit news cooperative, in order to share the costs of publishing breaking news stories about the Mexican-American War. And there may be no more historically consequential examples of great moments in journalistic collaboration than The New York Times and Washington Post’s publication of the secret Department of Defense history of the Vietnam War known as the Pentagon Papers. (See the recollections of former Post national editor Ben Bagdikian about this). Or certainly the Nixon Watergate scandal, in which numerous reporters including the Post’s Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward, wrote 201 stories in the first six months, more than twice what any other newspaper published on that subject during that critical time. And more recently, the Times’s stunning coverage over many weeks of the September 11, 2001 attack, involving over 100 reporters, editors, photographers and others. Each of these three instances of excellence in journalism involved substantial collaboration and won the highest Pulitzer Prize award, the coveted Gold Medal for Public Service. But in those instances, the collaborating journalists all worked for the same news organization based in the same country, or the collaboration was largely logistical in nature, sharing office space or expenses or modes of transportation or access to technology. The most evident, first stirrings of editorial collaboration by disparate reporters from different news organizations, at least in the United States, was in 1975, when a small group of reporters—Myrta Pulliam and Harley Bierce of The Indianapolis Star’s Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative team; Paul Williams, former managing editor of the Sun Newspapers in Omaha, Nebraska; Ron Koziol of the Chicago Tribune; columnists Jack Anderson and Les Whitten; David Burnham of The New York Times, Len Downie of The Washington Post, Robert Peirce of the St. Louis Globe-Democrat, Jack Landau of Newhouse Newspapers, Frank Anderson of the Long Beach Independent and others—met in Reston, Virginia. They wanted to “share tips about reporting and writing” and Investigative Reporters and Editors, Inc., was born, its first conference attended by 300 reporters in Indianapolis in 1976. Just days before that conference, 47-year-old Arizona Republic investigative reporter Don Bolles was blown up by a bomb that had been placed under his car in Phoenix. Murdered journalists in the United States, killed because of their inconvenient reporting, have been a relative rarity in the past century, and Bolles’s brutal slaying shocked IRE members, who resolved to investigate this outrageous “assault on the practice of investigative journalism,” as James L. Aucoin put it in “The Evolution of American Investigative Journalism.” A team of 39 reporters and editors from 28 newspapers and television stations, converged in Phoenix, and led by Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter and editor Robert W. “Bob” Greene of Newsday, not only ascertained exactly what had happened and why, but also exposed the deep ties of organized crime to local and state government in Arizona. They produced 40,000 internal memoranda that were filed and indexed, and ultimately, an 80,000-word, 23-part series of hard-hitting stories by participating media outlets about the extent of lawlessness in Arizona. From this important work, Bolles’s killers were identified and subsequently prosecuted. The IRE “Arizona Project,” as the Bolles investigation was known, was, according to author James Aucoin, “a defining moment in the history of journalism, particularly investigative journalism … a rare case when normally competitive investigative journalists set aside their egos and worked together on a story that was too big for any one of them alone … [They had] stood up for freedom of the press … to show those who killed him that the press will not be silenced by violence.” But there had also been deep organizational strains, with internal backbiting, prominent IRE Board members resigning, the financial cost of the extensive investigation running far higher than anyone had initially contemplated, some major news organizations refusing to publish the stories, and six libel or privacy-related lawsuits filed over the stories (five were settled out of court, and only one went to trial, a jury deciding no libel or invasion of privacy had occurred). Bolles’s murder became a call to journalistic arms, and 30 years later, another instance of this kind of solidarity and cross-newsroom reporting was the highly successful Chauncey Bailey Project after the respected Oakland Post editor was slain in August 2007. Under the leadership of Dori Maynard, president and CEO of the Robert C. Maynard Institute for Journalism Education in Oakland, and Sandy Close, executive editor of New America Media in San Francisco, the leading news organizations in the Bay Area came together, along with area journalism schools, the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ), IRE, the Knight Foundation, and others. And an extensive investigation into the killing was launched and coordinated by Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Robert “Rosey” Rosenthal, executive director
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nelson V. Mcclatchy Newspapers: What Happens When Freedom of the Press Collides with Free Speech?
    University of Miami Law Review Volume 54 Number 2 Article 6 1-1-2000 Nelson v. McClatchy Newspapers: What Happens When Freedom of the Press Collides with Free Speech? Adam Horowitz Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Part of the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Adam Horowitz, Nelson v. McClatchy Newspapers: What Happens When Freedom of the Press Collides with Free Speech?, 54 U. Miami L. Rev. 359 (2000) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol54/iss2/6 This Casenote is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CASENOTE Nelson v. McClatchy Newspapers: What Happens When Freedom of the Press Collides with Free Speech? I. INTRODUCTION On May 8, 1997, the Supreme Court of Washington decided Nelson v. McClatchy Newspapers.1 The Court determined that a state law prohibiting employment discrimination based upon an employee's polit- ical conduct could not be constitutionally applied to newspaper publishers.2 This case presented a conflict between two well-established, but polar principles in First Amendment jurisprudence.3 The plaintiff, for- mer Tacoma News Tribune (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribune") reporter Sandra Nelson, argued that the free press has "no special immu- nity from the application of general laws" and, therefore, is prohibited from engaging in employment discrimination.4 Conversely, the defend- ant, McClatchy Newspapers, maintained that the First Amendment shields newspaper publishers from statutory interference with their con- trol of editorial content.5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Look at Your Neighborhood
    HOW TO LOOK AT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD A Guide for Community Organizations and the Vital Neighborhoods Initiative A Publication of the Preservation Alliance for Greater Philadelphia 20112010 HOW TO LOOK AT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD A Guide for Community Organizations A Publication of the Preservation Alliance for Greater Philadelphia HOW TO LOOK AT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD is a publication of the Preservation Alliance for Greater Philadelphia. The Preservation Alliance is a non-profit organization whose mission is to actively promote the appreciation, protection and appropriate use and development of the Philadelphia region’s historic buildings, communities and landscapes. The Alliance offers a variety of educational programs, grants, and technical assistance to homeowners and community organizations to encourage the preservation of historic landmarks and the distinctive historic character of Philadelphia neighborhoods. In recent years the Alliance has greatly expanded its programs to preserve the character of Philadelphia neighborhoods and to engage residents and community organizations in preservation activities. The Alliance offers a variety of programs and services in support of its neighborhood preservation efforts including: • Advocacy support for the preservation of neighborhood historic resources and districts; • Educational workshops for homeowners and community organizations; • Special outreach to African American communities, historic sites and churches; • An Old House Fair and recognition awards to homeowners; • Small grants to community organizations
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Committee of Inquiry into Money Laundering, Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion Public Hearing The Panama papers – Discussion with the investigative journalists behind the revelations 27 September 2016 9h00 - 11h30 (2h30) Paul-Henri Spaak 1A002 Brussels Draft PROGRAMME 09:00 - 09:10 Welcome by the PANA Chair 09:10 - 09:20 Pre-recorded messages from Gerard Ryle and Marina Walker, Directors at the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) [based in Washington DC] Bastian Obermayer, Süddeutsche Zeitung [based in Washington DC] 09:20 - 10:10 Presentations by speakers (all confirmed, at 7 min each) Frederik Obermaier (Süddeutsche Zeitung) (via Skype/ visioconference) Kristof Clerix (Knack magazine, Belgium) Oliver Zihlmann (Sonntagszeitung | Le Matin Dimanche, Switzerland) Julia Stein and Jan Strozyk (Norddeutscher Rundfunk/ NDR, Germany) Minna Knus (MOT, Finnish Broadcasting Company, Finland) 10:30 - 11:25 Discussion with PANA Members 11:25 - 11:30 Conclusions by the PANA Chair Secretariat of the Committee of Inquiry into Money Laundering, Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion [email protected] PUBLIC HEARING THE PANAMA PAPERS – DISCUSSION WITH THE INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISTS BEHIND THE REVELATIONS TUESDAY, 27 SEPTEMBER 2016 9.00 - 11.30 Room: Paul-Henri Spaak (1A002) CVS OF THE JOURNALISTS Gerard Ryle Gerard Ryle leads the ICIJ’s headquarters staff in Washington, D.C., as well as overseeing the consortium’s more than 190 member journalists in more than 65 countries. Before joining as the ICIJ’s first non-American director in September 2011, Ryle spent 26 years working as a reporter, investigative reporter and editor in Australia and Ireland, including two decades at The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age newspapers.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitional Justice in the Aftermath of Civil Conflict
    Transitional Justice in the Aftermath of Civil Conflict Lessons from Peru, Guatemala and El Salvador Author Jo-Marie Burt Transitional Justice in the Aftermath of Civil Conflict: Lessons from Peru, Guatemala and El Salvador Author Jo-Marie Burt 1779 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Suite 710 Washington, D.C. 20036 T: (202) 462 7701 | F: (202) 462 7703 www.dplf.org 2018 Due Process of Law Foundation All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Published by Due Process of Law Foundation Washington D.C., 20036 www.dplf.org ISBN: 978-0-9912414-6-0 Cover design: ULTRAdesigns Cover photos: José Ángel Mejía, Salvadoran journalist; Jo-Marie Burt; DPLF Graphic design: ULTRAdesigns Author Acknowledgements iii Author Acknowledgements This report would not have been possible without the generosity of so many friends, colleagues and collaborators whose insights were critical to the preparation of this report. The experience of writing this report helped reinforce my belief that the theory of transitional justice much emanate from, and constantly be nourished from the experiences of those who engage in its day-to-day work: the survivors, the families of victims, the human rights defenders, lawyers, judicial operators, whose labor creates the things we understand to be transitional justice. My first debt of gratitude is to Katya Salazar, Executive Director of the Due Process of Law Foundation (DPLF), and Leonor Arteaga, Impunity and Grave Human Rights Senior Program Officer at DPLF, for their invitation to collaborate in the preparation of a grant proposal to the Bureau of Democracy, Labor and Human Rights, which led to the two-year funded project on transitional justice in post-conflict Peru, Guatemala and El Salvador that is the basis for this report.
    [Show full text]
  • N:\VGLANVIL\Myfiles\OPINIONS\Marchant\Phila News Motion Reject
    IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE:: CHAPTER 11 : PHILADELPHIA NEWSPAPERS, LLC, ET AL : CASE NO. 09-11204 SR : DEBTOR(S): JOINTLY ADMINISTERED OPINION BY: STEPHEN RASLAVICH, CHIEF UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE. Introduction Before the Court is the Debtors’ Motion For an Order Rejecting Asset Purchase Agreement and Related Agreements Between Certain of the Debtors and the McClatchy Company (McClatchy).1 The Motion is opposed. After hearing held November 17, 2009, the Court took the matter under advisement. For the reasons which follow, the Motion will be granted. Background Because the parties are in agreement as to what are most of the salient facts, little, if any, in the way of documentary or testimonial evidence was offered. The following is established by their pleadings: that the parties entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (APA) in May 2006 (Motion, ¶ 7; Response, ¶ 2); that under the APA the Debtors assumed certain liabilities of McClatchy (Motion ¶ 7, Response ¶ 3); 1The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has filed a Joinder to the Motion. In it, they have included their own proposed form of Order with suggested revisions to the Debtors’ proposed Order. The Court finds the Committee’s Order to be satisfactory and will enter it. that at the time of the sale, McClatchy had workers compensation insurance in place (Motion ¶ 9, Response ¶ 3); that the Debtors assumed liability for pre-existing workers compensation claims on those policies (Motion ¶ 9; Response ¶ 4); that although the Debtors assumed that liability, McClatchy remained listed as the insured on those policies (Id.); that McClatchy has continued to pay those “historical” claims (Id.); and that the Debtors routinely reimbursed McClatchy through the petition date but not thereafter.
    [Show full text]
  • N Ieman Reports
    NIEMAN REPORTS Nieman Reports One Francis Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 Nieman Reports THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION FOR JOURNALISM AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY VOL. 62 NO. 1 SPRING 2008 VOL. 62 NO. 1 SPRING 2008 21 ST CENTURY MUCKRAKERS THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION HARVARDAT UNIVERSITY 21st Century Muckrakers Who Are They? How Do They Do Their Work? Words & Reflections: Secrets, Sources and Silencing Watchdogs Journalism 2.0 End Note went to the Carnegie Endowment in New York but of the Oakland Tribune, and Maynard was throw- found times to return to Cambridge—like many, ing out questions fast and furiously about my civil I had “withdrawal symptoms” after my Harvard rights coverage. I realized my interview was lasting ‘to promote and elevate the year—and would meet with Tenney. She came to longer than most, and I wondered, “Is he trying to my wedding in Toronto in 1984, and we tried to knock me out of competition?” Then I happened to keep in touch regularly. Several of our class, Peggy glance over at Tenney and got the only smile from standards of journalism’ Simpson, Peggy Engel, Kat Harting, and Nancy the group—and a warm, welcoming one it was. I Day visited Tenney in her assisted living facility felt calmer. Finally, when the interview ended, I in Cambridge some years ago, during a Nieman am happy to say, Maynard leaped out of his chair reunion. She cared little about her own problems and hugged me. Agnes Wahl Nieman and was always interested in others. Curator Jim Tenney was a unique woman, and I thoroughly Thomson was the public and intellectual face of enjoyed her friendship.
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in die adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at die upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for the "Manchurian Candidate" the Cia and Mind Control
    THE SEARCH FOR THE "MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE" THE CIA AND MIND CONTROL John Marks Allen Lane Allen Lane Penguin Books Ltd 17 Grosvenor Gardens London SW1 OBD First published in the U.S.A. by Times Books, a division of Quadrangle/The New York Times Book Co., Inc., and simultaneously in Canada by Fitzhenry & Whiteside Ltd, 1979 First published in Great Britain by Allen Lane 1979 Copyright <£> John Marks, 1979 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner ISBN 07139 12790 jj Printed in Great Britain by f Thomson Litho Ltd, East Kilbride, Scotland J For Barbara and Daniel AUTHOR'S NOTE This book has grown out of the 16,000 pages of documents that the CIA released to me under the Freedom of Information Act. Without these documents, the best investigative reporting in the world could not have produced a book, and the secrets of CIA mind-control work would have remained buried forever, as the men who knew them had always intended. From the documentary base, I was able to expand my knowledge through interviews and readings in the behavioral sciences. Neverthe- less, the final result is not the whole story of the CIA's attack on the mind. Only a few insiders could have written that, and they choose to remain silent. I have done the best I can to make the book as accurate as possible, but I have been hampered by the refusal of most of the principal characters to be interviewed and by the CIA's destruction in 1973 of many of the key docu- ments.
    [Show full text]
  • J. Edgar Hoover: the Man and the Secrets. Curt Gentry. Plume: New York, 1991
    J. Edgar Hoover: The Man and the Secrets. Curt Gentry. Plume: New York, 1991. P. 45 “Although Hoover’s memo did not explicitly state what should be kept in this file, ... they might also, and often did, include personal information, sometimes derogatory in nature ...” P. 51 “their contents [Hoover’s O/C files] included blackmail material on the patriarch of an American political dynasty, his sons, their wives, and other women; allegations of two homosexual arrests which Hoover leaked to help defeat a witty, urbane Democratic presidential candidate; the surveillance reports on one of America’s best-known first ladies and her alleged lovers, both male and female, white and black; the child-molestation documentation the director used to control and manipulate on of his Red-baiting proteges...” P. 214 “Even before [Frank] Murphy had been sworn in, Hoover had opened a file on his new boss. It was not without derogatory information. Like Hoover, Murphy was a lifelong bachelor . the former Michigan governor was a ‘notorious womanizer’.” P. 262 “Hoover believed that the morality of America was his business . ghost-written articles warning the public about the dangers of motels and drive-in ‘passion-pits’.” P. 302 “That the first lady [Eleanor Roosevelt] refused Secret Service protection convinced Hoover that she had something to hide. That she also maintained a secret apartment in New York’s Greenwich Village, where she was often visited by her friends but never by the president, served to reinforce the FBI director’s suspicions. What she was hiding, Hoover convinced himself, was a hyperactive sex life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Data Journalism Handbook
    THE DATA JOURNALISM HANDBOOK Towards a Critical Data Practice Edited by Liliana Bounegru and Jonathan Gray 1 Bounegru & Gray (eds.) The Data Journalism Handbook “This is a stellar collection that spans applied and scholarly perspectives on practices of data journalism, rich with insights into the work of making data tell stories.” − Kate Crawford, New York University + Microsoft Research New York; author of Atlas of AI “Researchers sometimes suffer from what I call journalist-envy. Journalists, after all, write well, meet deadlines, and don’t take decades to complete their research. But the journalistic landscape has changed in ways that scholars should heed. A new, dynamic field—data journalism—is flourishing, one that makes the boundaries between our fields less rigid and more interesting. This exciting new volume interrogates this important shift, offering journalists and researchers alike an engaging, critical introduction to this field. Spanning the globe, with an impressive variety of data and purposes, the essays demonstrate the promise and limits of this form of journalism, one that yields new investigative strategies, one that warrants analysis. Perhaps new forms of collaboration will also emerge, and envy can give way to more creative relations.” − Wendy Espeland, Northwestern University; co-author of Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability “It is now established that data is entangled with politics and embedded in history and society. This bountiful book highlights the crucial role of data journalists
    [Show full text]
  • The Judgment Against Fujimori for Human Rights Violations*
    American University International Law Review Volume 25 Article 4 Issue 4 Volume 25, No. 4 2010 The udJ gment Against Fujimori for Human Rights Violations Aimee Sullivan Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Sullivan, Aimee. "The udJ gment Against Fujimori for Human Rights Violations." American University International Law Review 25, no.4 (2010): 657-842. This Translation is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TRANSLATION THE JUDGMENT AGAINST FUJIMORI FOR HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS* TRANSLATED BY AIMEE SULLIVAN** ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................... 661 PREFACE ........................................................................................ 664 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 667 1. EVIDENCE ............................................................................... 668 2. AGGRAVATED KIDNAPPING, MURDER, GRIEVOUS BODILY HARM, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: BARRIOS ALTOS AND LA CANTUTA ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978
    FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT OF 1978 HEARINGS BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE AND THE RIGHTS OF AMERICANS OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE NINETY-FIFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON S. 1566 FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT O1 1978 JTLY 19, 21, 1977 AND FEBRUARY 8, 24, 27, 1978 Printed for the use of the Select Committee on Intelligence U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 94-628 WASHINGTON: 1978 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 052-070-04477-2 SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE (Established by S. Res. 400, 94th Cong., 2d sess.) DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii, Chairman BARRY GOLDWATER, Arizona, Vice Chairman BIRCH BAYE, Indiana CLIFFORD P. CASE, New Jersey ADLAI E. STEVENSON, Illinois JA GMEN, Utah WILLIAM D. HATHAWAY, Maine CHARLES McC. MATHIAS, Sn., Maryland WALTER D. HUDDLESTON, Kentucky JAMES B. PEARSON, Kansas JOSEPH R. BIDEN, J., Delaware JOHN H. CHAFES, Rhode Island ROBERT MORGAN, North Carolina RICHARD G. LUGAR, Indiana GARY HART, Colorado MALCOLM WALLOP, Wyoming DANIEL PATRICK MOYNIHAN, New York ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, Ew Officio Member HOWARD H. BAKER, JR., Tennessee, Ex Officio Member WILLIAM 0. MILLER, Staff Director EARL D.EIsHNHOWER, Minority Staff Director AUDREY H. HATCR, Chief Clerk SUBCOsMITTE ON INTELLIGENCE AND THE ]RIGHTS OF AMERICANS BIRCH BAYH, Indiana, Chiran SAKE GARN, Utah, Vice Chairman ROBERT MORGAN, North Carolina CLIFFORD P. CASE, New Jersey DANIEL PATRICK MOYNIHAN, New York JOHN H. CHAFEE, Rhode Island CONTENTS HEARING DAYS Page Tuesday, July 19, 1977 1----. Thursday, July 21, 1977---------------------------------------------- 45 Wednesday, February 8, 1978 ----------------------------------------- 87 Friday, February 24, 1978 ------------------------------------------- 185 Monday, February 27, 1978 ------------------------------------------- 11 LIST OF WITNESSES TUESDAY, JULY 19, 1977 Testimony of Griffin B.
    [Show full text]