DOCSLIB.ORG

Oregon State University Department of Collection to the Museum in 1982

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oregon State University Department of Collection to the Museum in 1982 43714 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Notices Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Native American human remains were SUMMARY: The Oregon State University Berthold Reservation, North Dakota; Ute removed is the aboriginal land of the Department of Anthropology has Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Crow Tribe of Montana. completed an inventory of human Reservation, Utah; and Ute Mountain • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the remains, in consultation with the Tribe of the Ute Mountain Reservation, human remains described above appropriate Indian tribes, and has Colorado New Mexico & Utah represent the physical remains of one determined that there is a cultural (hereinafter referred to as ‘‘The Tribes’’). individual of Native American ancestry. affiliation between the human remains • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(A), and present-day Indian tribes. History and Description of the Remains the one object described above is Representatives of any Indian tribe that On an unknown date, human remains reasonably believed to have been placed believes itself to be culturally affiliated representing a minimum of one with or near individual human remains with the human remains may contact individual were removed from Maxson at the time of death or later as part of the Oregon State University Department #1, Site No. 20, N.E. of Greeley, Kuner, the death rite or ceremony. of Anthropology. Repatriation of the Weld County, CO, by Asa C. Maxson, an • Pursuant to 43 CFR 10.11(c)(1), the human remains to the Indian tribes avocational archeologist. In February disposition of the human remains and stated below may occur if no additional 2008, the human remains (16 teeth) associated funerary object is to the claimants come forward. were found in the collection during an Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River DATES: Representatives of any Indian inventory/computerization project. In Reservation, Wyoming; Cheyenne and tribe that believes it has a cultural July 2009, an object was identified as Arapaho Tribes, Oklahoma; Crow Tribe affiliation with the human remains being associated with this individual of Montana; and Northern Cheyenne should contact the Oregon State during an assessment of the human Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian University Department of Anthropology remains. Mr. Maxson of Longmont, CO, Reservation, Montana. at the address below by August 22, created a large archeological collection 2011. of items from Arizona, Colorado, New Additional Requestors and Disposition ADDRESSES: Dr. David McMurray, Mexico, and Mexico. He donated his Representatives of any Indian tribe Oregon State University Department of collection to the museum in 1982. No that believes itself to be culturally Anthropology, 238 Waldo Hall, known individual was identified. The affiliated with the human remains and Corvallis, OR 97331, telephone (541) associated funerary object is a bird of associated funerary object or any other 737–4515. prey talon that was possibly burned. Indian tribe that believes it satisfies the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: criteria in 43 CFR 10.11(c)(1) should Notice is Determinations Made by the University here given in accordance with the of Colorado Museum contact Steve Lekson, Curator of Anthropology, University of Colorado Native American Graves Protection and Officials of the University of Colorado Museum, in care of Jan Bernstein, Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. Museum have determined that: 3003, of the completion of an inventory • NAGPRA Consultant, Bernstein & Based on heavy dental attrition at a Associates, 1041 Lafayette St., Denver, of human remains in the control of the relatively young age (18–21 years old) CO 80218, telephone (303) 894–0648, Oregon State University Department of consistent with the introduction of grit before August 22, 2011. Disposition of Anthropology, Corvallis, OR. The into the food of a typical Native the human remains and associated human remains were removed from the American diet via the use of manos and funerary object to the Arapahoe Tribe of mouth of the Sandy River, Multnomah metates, the human remains are Native the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming; County, OR. This notice is published as part of the American. Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes, • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), a National Park Service’s administrative Oklahoma; Crow Tribe of Montana; and relationship of shared group identity responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the cannot be reasonably traced between the U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Native American human remains and this notice are the sole responsibility of Montana, may proceed after that date if associated funerary object and any the museum, institution, or Federal no additional claimants come forward. present-day Indian tribe. agency that has control of the Native The University of Colorado Museum • According to final judgments of the American human remains. The National is responsible for notifying The Tribes Indian Claims Commission, the land Park Service is not responsible for the that this notice has been published. from which the Native American human determinations in this notice. remains and associated funerary object Dated: July 14, 2011. Consultation were removed is the aboriginal land of Sherry Hutt, the Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Manager, National NAGPRA Program. A detailed assessment of the human Reservation, Wyoming; Cheyenne and [FR Doc. 2011–18359 Filed 7–20–11; 8:45 am] remains was made by Oregon State Arapaho Tribes, Oklahoma; and BILLING CODE 4312–50–P University Department of Anthropology Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the professional staff in consultation with a Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Montana. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Area archeologist, and the Confederated • Multiple lines of evidence, Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community including treaties, Acts of Congress, and National Park Service of Oregon; Confederated Tribes of the Executive Orders, indicate that the land Umatilla Indian Reservation, Oregon; from which the Native American human [2253–665] Confederated Tribes of the Warm remains and associated funerary object Springs Reservation of Oregon; and the were removed is the aboriginal land of Notice of Inventory Completion: Nez Perce Tribe, Idaho. The Burns the Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Oregon State University Department of Paiute Tribe; Confederated Tribes and Reservation, Wyoming, and Cheyenne Anthropology, Corvallis, OR Bands of the Yakama Nation, and Arapaho Tribes, Oklahoma. AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. Washington; Confederated Tribes of the • Other credible lines of evidence Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw ACTION: Notice. indicate that the land from which the Indians of Oregon; Confederated Tribes VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:00 Jul 20, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM 21JYN1 wreier-aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2011 / Notices 43715 of the Siletz Indians of Oregon; Coquille time of contact, the individual groups Additional Requestors and Disposition Tribe of Oregon; Cow Creek Band of spoke 30 dialects of the Athapascan, Representatives of any other Indian Umpqua Indians of Oregon; and Chinookan, Kalapuyan, Takelman, tribe that believes itself to be culturally Klamath Tribes, Oregon, were notified, Molalan, Sahaptin, Salishan, and affiliated with the human remains but did not participate in consultations Shastan language families. In 1856– should contact Dr. David McMurray, about the human remains described in 1857, the U.S. Government forcibly Oregon State University Department of this notice. relocated the Grand Ronde peoples to Anthropology, 238 Waldo Hall, History and Description of the Remains the Grand Ronde Reservation, located at Corvallis, OR 97331, telephone (541) the headwaters of the South Yamhill 737–3850, before August 22, 2011. In the 1970s, human remains River in Yamhill and Polk Counties, OR. representing a minimum of three Repatriation of the human remains to The last additions to the Grand Ronde individuals were removed from the Confederated Tribes of the Grand came onto the reservation in the 1870s. somewhere near the mouth of the Sandy Ronde Community of Oregon and the The Confederated Tribes of the Grand River, in Multnomah County, OR. The Confederated Tribes of the Warm human remains were removed due to Ronde Community of Oregon were first Springs Reservation of Oregon may illegal pot-hunting activities. The incorporated in 1935, terminated from proceed after that date if no additional human remains were subsequently Federal recognition in 1954, and claimants come forward. given to the university, but specific restored to recognized status in 1983. The Oregon State University provenience information was not The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Department of Anthropology is provided. No known individuals were Springs Reservation of Oregon are responsible for notifying the Burns identified. No associated funerary composed of the Wasco Tribe, the Warm Paiute Tribe; Confederated Tribes and objects are present. Springs Tribes, and groups of Northern Bands of the Yakama Nation, Washington; Confederated Tribes of the Ethnographic records suggest the Paiutes. The Wasco Tribe, made up of Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw mouth of the Sandy River, where it the Dalles and Dog River bands, Indians of Oregon; Confederated Tribes meets the Columbia River, was occupied occupied the lower Columbia River area of the Grand Ronde Community of by Chinookan peoples. The Chinookan and belong to the Chinookan language Oregon; Confederated Tribes of the peoples occupied a vast area for group. The Warm Springs Tribes, Siletz Indians of Oregon; Confederated hunting, fishing, and trade that was composed of the Upper Deschutes ‘‘south of the Columbia from the Tribes of the Umatilla Indian (Tygh), Lower Deschutes (Wyam), Reservation, Oregon; Confederated cascades to the mouth of the Tenino and John Day (Dock-spus) Willamette’’ (Berreman, 1937). The Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation bands, lived on the Deschutes and John of Oregon; Coquille Tribe of Oregon; Sandy River is within this vast area.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Click Here to Download the 4Th Grade Curriculum
    Copyright © 2014 The Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon. All rights reserved. All materials in this curriculum are copyrighted as designated. Any republication, retransmission, reproduction, or sale of all or part of this curriculum is prohibited. Introduction Welcome to the Grand Ronde Tribal History curriculum unit. We are thankful that you are taking the time to learn and teach this curriculum to your class. This unit has truly been a journey. It began as a pilot project in the fall of 2013 that was brought about by the need in Oregon schools for historically accurate and culturally relevant curriculum about Oregon Native Americans and as a response to countless requests from Oregon teachers for classroom- ready materials on Native Americans. The process of creating the curriculum was a Tribal wide effort. It involved the Tribe’s Education Department, Tribal Library, Land and Culture Department, Public Affairs, and other Tribal staff. The project would not have been possible without the support and direction of the Tribal Council. As the creation was taking place the Willamina School District agreed to serve as a partner in the project and allow their fourth grade teachers to pilot it during the 2013-2014 academic year. It was also piloted by one teacher from the Pleasant Hill School District. Once teachers began implementing the curriculum, feedback was received regarding the effectiveness of lesson delivery and revisions were made accordingly. The teachers allowed Tribal staff to visit during the lessons to observe how students responded to the curriculum design and worked after school to brainstorm new strategies for the lessons and provide insight from the classroom teacher perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Coast Bibliography by Unknown Bancroft, Hubert Howe
    Oregon Coast Bibliography By Unknown Bancroft, Hubert Howe. History of the Northwest Coast. Vol. 1: 1543-1800. San Francisco: A.L. Bancroft, 1884. Beck, David R.M. Seeking Recognition: The Termination and Restoration of the Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians, 1855-1984. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2009. _____. “’Standing out Here in the Surf’: The Termination and Restoration of the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians of Western Oregon in Historical Perspective.” Oregon Historical Quarterly 110:1 (Spring 2009): 6-37. Beckham, Stephen Dow. “History of Western Oregon Since 1846.” In Handbook of North American Indians. Vol. 7: Northwest Coast, ed. Wayne Suttles and William Sturtevant. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution, 1990. _____. The Indians of Western Oregon: This Land Was Theirs. Coos Bay, OR: Arago Books, 1977. _____. Requiem for a People: The Rogue Indians and the Frontiersmen. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, 1996. First published 1971. _____. Oregon Indians: Voices from Two Centuries. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, 2006. Berg, Laura, ed. The First Oregonians. Portland: Oregon Council for the Humanities, 2007. Bingham, Edwin R., and Glen A. Love, eds. Northwest Perspectives: Essays on the Culture of the Pacific Northwest. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1979. Boag, Peter. Environment and Experience: Settlement Culture in Nineteenth-Century Oregon. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992. Bourhill, Bob. History of Oregon’s Timber Harvests and/or Lumber Production. Salem: Oregon Department of Forestry, 1994. Bowen, William Adrian. “Migration and Settlement on a Far Western Frontier: Oregon to 1850.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley, 1972. Boyd, Robert T., Kenneth M.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Cultures (PDF)
    Unit 5: Life Skills Overview and Resources ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Not So Long Ago ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Encounters With Strangers ................................................................................................................................. 12 Make Yourself Acquainted ................................................................................................................................. 16 Ask Mr./Ms. Manners ........................................................................................................................................ 31 Games, Sports and Amusements ........................................................................................................................ 34 CONTENT KNOWLEDGE STANDARDS BY LESSON ................................................................................................ 43 © 2001 Lewis and Clark Trial Heritage Foundation 6.1 Overview and Resources The North American west was not a vacant place. Meriwether Lewis, William Clark and the Corps of Discovery found not only abundance but also great diversity in the Native American cultures. The people living west of the Mississippi River were neither “flower children” nor “savages.” They were human beings with the same concerns for themselves, their families and their
    [Show full text]
  • Chinook Resilience Heritage and Cultural Revitalization on the Lower Columbia River JON D
    FORTHCOMING FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON PRESS 30% off Chinook Resilience Heritage and Cultural Revitalization on the Lower Columbia River JON D. DAEHNKE FOREWORD BY TONY A. JOHNSON NATIVE AMERICAN AND INDIGE- The Chinook Indian Nation-whose ancestors lived along both shores of the NOUS STUDIES; ANTHROPOLOGY; HISTORY / WESTERN HISTORY river’s mouth-continue to reside near traditional lands. Because of its nonrec- lower Columbia River, as well as north and south along the Pacific coast at the 248 pp., 15 illus. ognized status, the Chinook Indian Nation often faces challenges in its efforts to $30.00 paperback, 9780295742267 claim and control cultural heritage and its own history and to assert a right to Indigenous Confluences place on the Columbia River. November 2017 Chinook Resilience is a collaborative ethnography of how the Chinook Indian Na- JON D. DAEHNKE is assistant professor tion, whose land and heritage are under assault, continues to move forward and of anthropology at the University of Cali- remain culturally strong and resilient. Jon Daehnke focuses on Chinook partici- fornia, Santa Cruz. pation in archaeological projects and sites of public history as well as the tribe’s embodied enactment of heritage, one steeped in reciprocity and protocol rather role in the revitalization of canoe culture in the Pacific Northwest. This lived and to pre-order at 30% discount than documentation and preservation of material objects, offers a tribally rele- Call Hopkins Fulfillment Service at vant, forward-looking, and decolonized approach for the cultural resilience and 1-800-537-5487 or order online. survival of the Chinook Indian Nation, even in the face of federal nonrecognition.
    [Show full text]
  • CTUIR Traditional Use Study of Willamette Falls and Lower
    Traditional Use Study of Willamette Falls and the Lower Columbia River by the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Jennifer Karson Engum, Ph.D. Cultural Resources Protection Program Report prepared for CTUIR Board of Trustees Fish and Wildlife Commission Cultural Resources Committee CAYUSE, UMATILLAANDWALLA WALLA TRIBES November 16, 2020 CONFEDERATED TRIBES of the Umatilla Indian Reservation 46411 Timíne Way PENDLETON, OREGON TREATY JUNE 9, 1855 REDACTED FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Traditional Use Study of Willamette Falls and the Lower Columbia River by the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Prepared by Jennifer Karson Engum, Ph.D. Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Department of Natural Resources Cultural Resources Protection Program 46411 Timíne Way Pendleton, Oregon 97801 Prepared for CTUIR Board of Trustees Fish and Wildlife Commission Cultural Resources Committee November 16, 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Umatilla (Imatalamłáma), Cayuse (Weyíiletpu), and Walla Walla (Walúulapam) peoples, who comprise the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR), have traveled throughout the west, including to the lower Columbia and Willamette Rivers and to Willamette Falls, to exercise their reserved treaty rights to hunt, fish, and gather the traditional subsistence resources known as the First Foods. They have been doing so since time immemorial, an important indigenous concept which describes a time continuum that spans from ancient times to present day. In post- contact years, interactions expanded to include explorers, traders and missionaries, who brought with them new opportunities for trade and intermarriage as well as the devastating circumstances brought by disease, warfare, and the reservation era. Through cultural adaptation and uninterrupted treaty rights, the CTUIR never ceased to continue to travel to the lower Columbia and Willamette River and falls for seasonal traditional practice and for other purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Lewis and Clark National Historical Park National Park Service
    LEWIS AND CLARK NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 61 ark Lewis and Clark National Historical P On December 10, 1805, members of the Corps the explorers. In addition to the fort, the Corps This fort exhibit, of Discovery began constructing a fort on the of Discovery also constructed a salt cairn near built in 1955, burned down in 2005. Park Netul River, now called the Lewis and Clark the present-day city of Seaside, Oregon, to staff and volunteers River, near present-day Astoria, Oregon. Fort extract salt from ocean water to help preserve immediately began Clatsop, named after the local Clatsop Indian and flavor meat for the return journey. work on a new tribe, was completed in a couple of weeks, and Upon leaving the fort on March 23, 1806, exhibit, which will be the party spent three and a half months there Lewis gave the structure and its furnishings to dedicated by the close of 2006. before commencing their return journey back Clatsop Chief Coboway. Over time, the fort east. The members of the expedition traded deteriorated and the land was claimed and sold with the Clatsop people, who were friendly to by various Euro-American settlers who came to Note: When interpreting the scores for natural resource conditions, recognize that critical information upon which the ratings are based is not always available. This limits data interpretation to some extent. For Lewis and Clark National Historical Park, 59 percent of the information requirements associated with the methods were met. RESOURCE CATEGORY CURRENT CULTURAL RESOURCES
    [Show full text]
  • Chinookan Villages of the Lower Columbia
    Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Anthropology Spring 2016 Chinookan Villages of the Lower Columbia Henry B. Zenk Portland State University Yvonne P. Hajda Robert T. Boyd Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Zenk H., Hajda, Y., and Boyd, R. (2016). Chinookan Villages of the Lower Columbia. Oregon Historical Quarterly, Vol. 117, No. 1, pp. 6-37. This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Chinookan Villages of the Lower Columbia HENRY ZENK, YVONNE HAJDA, AND ROBERT BOYD VILLAGES WERE THE CENTER of Chinookan life, filling the role that tribes did for Native people in other parts of North America. Every village of any size or significance had a recognized leader or chief, and constituted a named local group with which its members identified themselves. Although the villages themselves are long vanished, early travelers, missionaries, and settlers have left us eyewitness accounts of what some were like. The names and approximate locations of many more can be reconstructed from historical sources and information shared by later generations of lower Columbia
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Columbia Chinookan Ceremonialism
    Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Anthropology 6-2013 Lower Columbia Chinookan Ceremonialism Robert T. Boyd Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Boyd, Robert T., "Lower Columbia Chinookan Ceremonialism," in Chinookan Peoples of the Lower Columbia River, pages 181-198. University of Washington Press (June 2013) This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. NINE lO\NER COlUMBIA CHINOOKAN CEREMONIAUSM Robert T. Boyd RADITIONAL Chinookan ceremonies or religious rituals were particularly vulnerable to the rapid changes that came with Euro­ T American contact. Change and loss occurred after the epidemics of the 1830s removed many specialists and broke apart the critical mass of people needed for group performances; and in the early 1840s, when mis­ sionaries at the surviving settlements at Willamette Falls, The Cascades, and the mouth of the Columbia discouraged traditional life rites. After such experiences, the details on what was practiced and the belief system behind it remained mostly in the minds of a few traditionalist survivors. This reconstruction of what went before is based on two sets of data: eye­ witness accounts of practices from the early contact period and ethnographic information collected from Chinookan informants between 1890 and 1936.
    [Show full text]
  • Carolyn Patricia Mcaleer for the Degree of Master of Arts in Applied Anthropology Presented on November 14, 2003
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Carolyn Patricia McAleer for the degree of Master of Arts in Applied Anthropology presented on November 14, 2003. Title: Patterns from the Past: Exploring Gender and Ethnicity through Historical Archaeology among Fur Trade Families in the Willamette Valley of Oregon. Abstract Approved: Redacted for privacy David R. Brauner This thesis examines archaeological material in order to explore gender and ethnicity issues concerning fur tradeera families from a settlement in the Willamette Valley, Oregon. Ethnohistorical information consisting of traders journals and travelers observations, as well as documentation from the Hudson's Bay Company, Catholic church records, and genealogical information helped support and guide this research. By using historical information as wellas archaeological material, this research attempted to interpret possible ethnic markers and gender relationships between husbands and wives among five fur tradeera families. Families of mixed ethnicity, including French Canadian, Native, Metis and American, settled the valley after 1828 bringing with them objects and activities characteristic of their way of life. Retired fur tradetrappers, of French Canadian and American decent, married either Metisor Native women. Of 53 identified families, four French Canadian/Native families have been chosen for this project,as well as one American settler, and his Native wife. Little is known about how these women interacted within their families or whether they maintained certain characteristics of their Native culture. It was hoped that these unique cultural dynamics might become evident through an analysis of the ceramic assemblages from these sites. Due to the extensive nature of the archaeological collections, and time constraints related to this thesis, only ceramics have been examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Investigations at 45CL1 Cathlapotle (1991-1996) , Ridgefield an Tional Wildlife Refuge Clark County, Washington a Preliminary Report
    Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Anthropology Presentations 1999 Archaeological Investigations at 45CL1 Cathlapotle (1991-1996) , Ridgefield aN tional Wildlife Refuge Clark County, Washington A Preliminary Report Kenneth M. Ames Portland State University, [email protected] Cameron M. Smith Portland State University William L. Cornett Portland State University Elizabeth A. Sobel Portland State University Stephen C. Hamilton Portland State University See next page for additional authors Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Citation Details Ames, K. M., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service., & Portland State University. (1999). Archaeological investigations at 45CL1 Cathlapotle (1991-1996), Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge, Clark County, Washington: A preliminary report. Portland, Or: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This Technical Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Kenneth M. Ames, Cameron M. Smith, William L. Cornett, Elizabeth A. Sobel, Stephen C. Hamilton, John Wolf, Doria Raetz, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Region 1, and Portland State University. Department of Anthropology This technical report is available at PDXScholar: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac/61 Archaeological Investigations at 45CL1 Cathlapotle (1991-1996) , Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge Clark County, Washington A Preliminary Report by Kenneth M. Ames, Cameron M. Smith, William L. Cornett, Elizabeth A. Sobel, Stephen C. Hamilton, John Wolf and Doria Raetz Prepared for U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Chinookan Disease and Demography
    Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Anthropology 6-2013 Lower Chinookan Disease and Demography Robert T. Boyd Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Boyd, Robert T., "Lower Chinookan Disease and Demography," in Chinookan Peoples of the Lower Columbia River, pages 229-249. University of Washington Press (June 2013) This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. ELEVEN lOWER CHINOOKAN DISEASE AND DEMOGRAPHY Robert T. Boyd N the first century of contact, the Lower Columbia Chinookans suffered more from the effects of introduced diseases and depopulation than I almost any other Native peoples in the Northwest. Yet they survived, and their numbers are increasing. This chapter is a history of Lower Chinookan disease and population, from the aboriginal state, through the disruptive early contact years, up to the rebound and revitalization of the last century. ABORIGINAL HEALTH AND DISEASE Like other Northwest Coast peoples contacted by whites in the late 1700s and in common with early contact hunting-gathering peoples around the world, Lower Columbia Chinookans were relatively healthy. The explorers and traders who first met them said as much. On November 1, 1805, after spend­ ing nearly a year in lower-river Chinookan territory, William Clark wrote: "The nativs of the waters of the Columbia appear helthy" (Lewis and Clark 1988:373).
    [Show full text]
  • Environment and Archaeology of the Lower Columbia
    Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Anthropology Presentations 6-2013 Environment and Archaeology of the Lower Columbia Elizabeth A. Sobel Missouri State University Kenneth M. Ames Portland State University Robert J. Losey University of Alberta Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Citation Details Sobel, Elizabeth A., Ames, Kenneth M. and Robert J. Losey, "Environment and Archaeology of the Lower Columbia," in Chinookan Peoples of the Lower Columbia River, pages 23-41. University of Washington Press (June 2013) This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ONE ENVIRONMENT AND ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE LOWER COLUMBIA Elizabeth A. Sobel, Kenneth M. Ames, and Robert J. Losey HE Columbia is the great river of the American West. The interplay of river, ocean, mountains, and climate produced a rich and produc­ Ttive but dynamic environment, and people have lived in and adjusted to this environment for at least 12,000 years. The fourth largest river in North America, the Columbia is exceeded in water volume only by the Mississippi, St. Lawrence, and Mackenzie Rivers. Its source is in British Columbia, on the west slope of the Canadian Rockies. Between there and where it enters the Pacific Ocean, the Columbia flows 1,268 miles (2,040 kilometers), winds through four mountain ranges, descends 2,657 feet (810 meters), drains 257.993 square miles (668,200 square kilometers), generates more hydro­ electric power than any other waterway in North America, and historically has supported more salmon than just about any other North American river (Roberge 1985:11-16; Schwantes 1989:12).
    [Show full text]