Accelerating South Korean Offshore Wind Through Partnerships, May 2021 3
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Gravity-Based Foundations in the Offshore Wind Sector
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Review Gravity-Based Foundations in the Offshore Wind Sector M. Dolores Esteban *, José-Santos López-Gutiérrez and Vicente Negro Research Group on Marine, Coastal and Port Environment and other Sensitive Areas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, E28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] (J.-S.L.-G.); [email protected] (V.N.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 December 2018; Accepted: 24 January 2019; Published: 12 March 2019 Abstract: In recent years, the offshore wind industry has seen an important boost that is expected to continue in the coming years. In order for the offshore wind industry to achieve adequate development, it is essential to solve some existing uncertainties, some of which relate to foundations. These foundations are important for this type of project. As foundations represent approximately 35% of the total cost of an offshore wind project, it is essential that they receive special attention. There are different types of foundations that are used in the offshore wind industry. The most common types are steel monopiles, gravity-based structures (GBS), tripods, and jackets. However, there are some other types, such as suction caissons, tripiles, etc. For high water depths, the alternative to the previously mentioned foundations is the use of floating supports. Some offshore wind installations currently in operation have GBS-type foundations (also known as GBF: Gravity-based foundation). Although this typology has not been widely used until now, there is research that has highlighted its advantages over other types of foundation for both small and large water depth sites. There are no doubts over the importance of GBS. -
Modeling and Dynamic Analysis of Offshore Wind Farms in France: Impact on Power System Stability
04/11/2011 Modeling and dynamic analysis of offshore wind farms in France: Impact on power system stability KTH Master Thesis report number Alexandre Henry Examiner at KTH Dr. Luigi Vanfretti Supervisors at KTH Dr. Luigi Vanfretti and Camille Hamon Supervisor at EDF Dr. Bayram Tounsi Laboratory Electric Power Systems School of Electrical Engineering KTH, Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, November 2011 Accessibility : .. Front page Page I / III ... Modeling and dynamic analysis of offshore wind farms in France: Impact on KTH EPS power system stability - EDF R&D Abstract Alexandre Henry Page 1 / 90 KTH Master Thesis Modeling and dynamic analysis of offshore wind farms in France: Impact on KTH EPS power system stability - EDF R&D Nomenclature EWEA : European Wind Energy Association UK : United Kingdom EU : European union AC : Alternating current DC : Direct current HVAC : High Voltage Alternating Current HVDC : High Voltage Direct Current PCC : Point of Common Coupling TSO : Transmission System Operator RTE : Réseau de transport d’électricité (French TSO) XLPE : cross linked polythylene insulated VSC : Voltage source converter LCC : Line commutated converter FACTS : Flexible AC Transmission System SVC : Static Var Compensator DFIG : Double Fed Induction Generator MVAC : Medium Voltage Alternating Current ENTSO-E : European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity HFF : High Frequency Filter FRT : Fault Ride Through Alexandre Henry Page 2 / 90 KTH Master Thesis Modeling and dynamic analysis of offshore wind farms -
Letter to RT Hon Kwasi Kwarteng MP: Summary
Macquarie Corporate Holdings Pty Limited (UK Branch) A Member of the Macquarie Group of Companies Ropemaker Place 28 Ropemaker Street London EC2Y 9HD Internet www.macquarie.com/eu UNITED KINGDOM Rt Hon Kwasi Kwarteng MP Minister for Business, Energy and Clean Growth Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy 1 Victoria Street London SW1H 0ET 10 December 2020 Dear Minister Summary of progress since the acquisition of the UK Green Investment Bank It was a pleasure to meet you last month to discuss the UK Government’s ambitious agenda on decarbonisation and legally binding commitment to net zero. Following our meeting, I wanted to write to provide you with an overview of progress since our acquisition of the UK Green Investment Bank, and our plans for the future. Macquarie was proud to acquire the UK Green Investment Bank (GIB) three years ago, combining the world’s first green bank and the world’s largest infrastructure investor. The result – the Green Investment Group (GIG) – is now one of the world’s leading renewable energy developers and investors. It has remained true to its original mission, continues to be led from the UK and its green purposes remain enshrined in its legal constitution and culture. At the time of the acquisition, Macquarie made a number of commitments to the UK Government. Those commitments reflected our intentions and ambitions to grow GIB and continue its success story, backed by the strength, diversity and resources of Macquarie Group. They also reflected the objectives of the UK Government, in allowing GIB the freedom to increase the sectors and technologies in which it operates, commit ever greater levels of capital to green projects, and expand its operations internationally to export this UK success story overseas. -
FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped
2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) Alteogen 0.19 KOREA Hyundai Engineering & Construction 0.35 KOREA NH Investment & Securities 0.14 KOREA AmoreG 0.15 KOREA Hyundai Glovis 0.32 KOREA NHN 0.07 KOREA Amorepacific Corp 0.65 KOREA Hyundai Heavy Industries 0.29 KOREA Nong Shim 0.08 KOREA Amorepacific Pfd. 0.08 KOREA Hyundai Marine & Fire Insurance 0.13 KOREA OCI 0.17 KOREA BGF Retail 0.09 KOREA Hyundai Merchant Marine 1.02 KOREA Orion 0.21 KOREA BNK Financial Group 0.18 KOREA Hyundai Mipo Dockyard 0.15 KOREA Ottogi 0.06 KOREA Celltrion Healthcare 0.68 KOREA Hyundai Mobis 1.53 KOREA Paradise 0.07 KOREA Celltrion Inc 2.29 KOREA Hyundai Motor 2.74 KOREA Posco 1.85 KOREA Celltrion Pharm 0.24 KOREA Hyundai Motor 2nd Pfd. 0.33 KOREA Posco Chemical 0.32 KOREA Cheil Worldwide 0.14 KOREA Hyundai Motor Pfd. 0.21 KOREA Posco International 0.09 KOREA CJ Cheiljedang 0.3 KOREA Hyundai Steel 0.33 KOREA S1 Corporation 0.13 KOREA CJ CheilJedang Pfd. 0.02 KOREA Hyundai Wia 0.13 KOREA Samsung Biologics 0.92 KOREA CJ Corp 0.11 KOREA Industrial Bank of Korea 0.22 KOREA Samsung C&T 0.94 KOREA CJ ENM 0.15 KOREA Kakao 3.65 KOREA Samsung Card 0.08 KOREA CJ Logistics 0.12 KOREA Kangwon Land 0.23 KOREA Samsung Electro-Mechanics 0.81 KOREA Coway 0.36 KOREA KB Financial Group 1.78 KOREA Samsung Electronics 25.36 KOREA Daewoo Engineering & Construction 0.12 KOREA KCC Corp 0.12 KOREA Samsung Electronics Pfd. -
Spatial Variations in Fertility of South Korea: a Geographically Weighted Regression Approach
International Journal of Geo-Information Article Spatial Variations in Fertility of South Korea: A Geographically Weighted Regression Approach Myunggu Jung 1 , Woorim Ko 2, Yeohee Choi 3 and Youngtae Cho 2,* 1 Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK; [email protected] 2 Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea; [email protected] 3 Department of Social Welfare, Graduate School of Social Welfare, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-880-2820 Received: 5 May 2019; Accepted: 4 June 2019; Published: 5 June 2019 Abstract: South Korea has witnessed a remarkable decline in birth rates in the last few decades. Although there has been a large volume of literature exploring the determinants of low fertility in South Korea, studies on spatial variations in fertility are scarce. This study compares the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) models to investigate the potential role of the spatially heterogeneous response of the total fertility rate (TFR) to sociodemographic factors. The study finds that the relationships between sociodemographic factors and TFRs in South Korea vary across 252 sub-administrative areas in terms of both magnitude and direction. This study therefore demonstrates the value of using spatial analysis for providing evidence-based local-population policy options in pursuit of a fertility rebound in South Korea. Keywords: low fertility; spatial analysis; GIS; regional fertility differentials; total fertility rate 1. Introduction In the last few decades, South Korea has witnessed a remarkable decline in birth rates. -
Ipv6 Deployment Experience Sharing and Current Strategy in Korea
___________________________________________________________________________ 2010/TEL41/DSG/WKSP2/010 Agenda Item: Panel Discussion 2 IPv6 Deployment Experience Sharing and Current Strategy in Korea Submitted by: Korea Workshop for IPv6: Transforming the Internet Chinese Taipei 8 May 2010 2010. 5. 8 APEC TEL41 IPv6 Workshop Inhye Kim IP policy & management team Korea Internet & Security Agency Contents 11 CurrentCurrent IPv6IPv6 StatusStatus inin KoreaKorea 22 ExperienceExperience SharingSharing 33 CurrentCurrent StrategyStrategy inin 20102010 1. Current IPv6 Status in Korea [Info.]A brief history of IPv6 in Korea ‘IPv6 Promotion plan I’ was announced 2003~ 2003~ ‘IPv6 strategy council (chairman: Minister)’ was established Phase1 R&D 2006.92006.9 IPv6 requirement was contained as one of provisions in EA law 2004~20072004~2007 KOREAv6 Trial Service (25 projects ) Korea government has invested about $26M for IPv6 R&D project since 2000 By reformation of government, Korea Communications Commission 2008.32008.3 (KCC) was key player for IPv6 promotion Phase2 Imple- KCC support 16 local governments and research institutions to mentat 20082008 build IPv6/IPv4 backbone network. -ion ISP’s backbone network will have been changing IPv4/IPv6 ready 20092009 network by 2011 Now, Korea have 5,202 blocks of /32 IPv6 address. Ranked 3th in Asian-Pacific area Current IPv6 status in Korea • Collaboration system – In 2009, to collaborate among stakeholders, ‘IPv6 Promotion council’ was established with ISPs, KCC(Korea Communication Commission), and several government departments. • Mainly focused on increasing a IPv6 readiness of network infrastructure. • Private & Public sector – Major ISPs now concerned IPv4/IPv6 dual stack product requirement mandatory. – In 2006, government conducted procurement policy regarding to IPv6-aware product. -
Hydrogen Energy of KOREA.Pdf
Renewable Hydrogen Conference Hydrogen Energy of KOREA 2018. 8. 31. Jin-Nam Park H2KOREA / Kyungil University □ Contents 1. H2KOREA 2. The Status of H2 Related Industry 3. H2 Related Technology Development 4. Government Policies for H2 Energy 5. Cooperation between Korea and Australia 2 1. H2KOREA 3 □ H2KOREA Centering on H2KOREA, FCEV & hydrogen energy industry are promoted Public-Private Partnership by the investment of members (since Feb. 2017) Affiliated organization of the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy. Ministry of Environment / Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport / Ministry of Strategy and Finance and various local governments are member or participating Goal: Promotion of FCEV related industry and hydrogen energy industry. Special Members Regular Members Associate Members Government Department: 3, Local Government: 11, Company: 26, Others: 13 (Aug. 15, 2018) 4 □ H2KOREA Organization Board of Directors Director General Advisory Group Audit Secretary General Policy Infrastructure Technology Business Planning Div. Buildup Div. Development Div. Cooperation Div. • H2 Market analysis • H2 price • H2 energy • Public promotion • H2 infrastructure safety • Stable hydrogen • HRS • Regional cooperation • FCEV safety & supply • FCEV • International operation management • HRS Management cooperation • H2 industry promotion • Code & standard policy 5 2. The Status of H2 Related Industry 6 □ H2 Production Capacity of Korea (2015) Hydrogen Production: 1.9 Million Tons - Mainly produced in Petrochemical Complex Chungnam (Daesan) -
A Study on Cremated Bodies Types at Public Cremation Facilities of Metropolitan Cities That Using E-Haneul Funeral Information System
International Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence Vol.9 No.1 154-162 (2020) http://dx.doi.org/10.7236/IJASC.2020.9.1.154 IJASC 20-1-18 A Study on Cremated Bodies Types at Public Cremation Facilities of Metropolitan Cities that Using E-Haneul Funeral Information System Jae-sil Choi*, Jeong-lae Kim** * Professor, Department of Mortuary Science, Eulji University, Seongnam 13135, Korea E-mail: [email protected] ** Professor, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eulji University, Seongnam 13135, Korea E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We studies show that ratio of corpse among cremated bodies in public cremation facilities in metropolitan cities using E-Haneul funeral information system is average 90.1%, which is high, in bigger metropolitan cities with over 2 million of population (Incheon, Busan, and Daegu), but is average 81.4%, which is relatively low, in smaller metropolitan cities with less than 2 million of population(Daejeon, Gwangju, and Ulsan). In addition, the cremated bodies ratio of opening remains is average 17.4% in smaller metropolitan cities with less than 2 million of population, but is average 8.9% in those with over 2 million of population, which is relatively low. Finally, the cremated bodies ratio of dead fetuses is average 1.2% in smaller metropolitan cities with less than 2 million of population, and average 1.0% in those with over 2 million of population, which is low. Based on the above result, we are the following suggestions to improve the effectiveness of funeral facility use by the increase of demand for public cremation facilities in metropolitan cities. -
Posco International Corporation
POSCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION Sustainability Report 2019 About This Report The 2019 POSCO INTERNATIONAL Sustainability Report, the forth annual publication, illustrate the Company’s performance fulfill- ing its economic, social, and environmental responsibility. POSCO INTERNATIONAL aims to transparently disclose its sustainability management activities for the year 2019 and communicate with wide-ranging stakeholders. Reporting Guidelines Global Reporting Initiative(GRI) Standards: Core Option Reporting Period January 1, 2019 ~ December 31, 2019 * 2017 ~ H1 of 2020 for a portion of the performance data Reporting Scope Economy: On a consolidated basis in accordance with the K-IFRS 〮 Society & Environment: POSCO INTERNATIONAL Headquarters, 〮 POSCO SPS1), and overseas worksites (Myanmar, Indonesia, and Uzbekistan) Areas where major operations are based: Republic of Korea 〮 1) This refers to the STS Division, the TMC Division and the Plate Fabrication Division that were split off as subsidiaries in April 2020. Reporting Cycle Annually(publication of the most recent report: 2019) Assurance Financial data: Earnst & Young Han Young 〮 Non-financial data: DNV GL 〮 Contact Details Address: 165 Convensia-daero(POSCO Tower-Songdo), Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-2-759-2861 Department in charge: Sustainability Management Section E-mail: [email protected] POSCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION Sustainability Report 2019 03 Global CSR Activities 01 We Make Sustainability 02 Sustainability Management Strategy 102 Global CSR Overview -
U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment
U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment Issue Date | March 2020 Prepared By American Wind Energy Association Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Current Status of U.S. Offshore Wind .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Lessons from Land-based Wind ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Announced Investments in Domestic Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................ 5 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Input Assumptions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Modeling Tool ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ -
Korean Multinationals Show Solid Recovery After Global Crisis
Korean multinationals show solid recovery after global crisis Report dated November 16, 2010 EMBARGO: The contents of this report must not be quoted or summarized in the print, broadcast or electronic media before November 16, 2010, 10:00 a.m. Seoul; 1 a.m. GMT, and 9:00 p.m. November 15, 2010, New York. Seoul and New York, November 16, 2010 The Institute of International Affairs of the Graduate School of International Studies (GSIS) at Seoul National University in Seoul, and the Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment (VCC) at Columbia University in New York, are releasing the first annual report on leading Korean multinationals. The research for this report was conducted in 2010 and covers the period 2007 to 2009. 1 Highlights The Republic of Korea (henceforth ‘Korea’), the 11 th largest economy in the world, has now become one of the leading investors abroad. The number and the size of the corporate giants that dominate the economy have increased over the years, boosting and diversifying their investments around the world. Korea’s multinational enterprises ranked by their foreign assets (see table 1 below) show about USD 93 billion in assets held abroad. 2 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (SEC), a member of a leading Korean conglomerate, ranked 1 st with slightly over USD 18 billion, followed by another top conglomerate member, LG Electronics, with over USD 10 billion dollars. Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd, and DSME Co., Ltd, had foreign assets of over USD 8 billion each and LG Display had over USD 6 billion. The top five firms together accounted for just over half of the total foreign assets of the top 20 companies. -
Macquarie Green Finance Impact Report
Green Finance Impact Report 2020 2020 Green Finance Impact Report Table of Contents Introduction ................ 2 Key highlights ................ 3 Summary of green metrics ................ 4 Macquarie’s green financing transactions ................ 6 Approach ................ 8 Green impact ................ 11 Macquarie and green investment ................ 12 Glossary ................ 16 Appendix 1: GIG Green Impact Report ................ 17 Appendix 2: PWC Assurance Report ................ 29 3 2020 Green Finance Impact Report Introduction Macquarie Group Limited (“Macquarie or MGL”) is pleased to present its Green Finance Impact Report for the twelve months to 31 March 2020. This report relates to the MGL 2018 £2,100 million loan facility of which £500 million constitutes as green financing (“green tranches”). It provides information on the environmental benefits (“green impact”) of the eligible projects1 which have been notionally allocated2 green tranche financing. MGL is also pleased to note it has raised its second green financing transaction in March 2020, a US$300 million Samurai loan facility in the Japanese market of which US$150 million constitutes as green financing. This loan was not drawn at the 31 March reporting period and is not covered by this report. The approach presented in this report is consistent with Macquarie’s Green Finance Framework (“GFF”) which was developed in accordance with the APLMA3 Green Loan Principles. Macquarie has utilised the expertise of its Green Investment Group (“GIG”) Green Investment Ratings team to demonstrate the green impact of its eligible projects. The full Impact Report is available in Appendix 1. Macquarie’s GIG is a specialist in green infrastructure principal investment, project development and delivery, green impact advisory and the management of portfolio assets.