Post-Transcriptional Modification by / Hanaa Shawky Ragheb Supervised by Prof.Dr / Rasha El Tahan Course / Molecular Biology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Post-Transcriptional Modification by / Hanaa Shawky Ragheb Supervised by Prof.Dr / Rasha El Tahan Course / Molecular Biology Post-transcriptional modification By / Hanaa Shawky Ragheb Supervised by prof.dr / Rasha El Tahan Course / Molecular Biology Molecular biology: is a branch of science concerning biological activity at the molecular level. The field of molecular biology overlaps with biology and chemistry and in particular, genetics and biochemistry. A key area of molecular biology concerns understanding how various cellular systems interact in terms of the way DNA, RNA and protein synthesis function. Molecular biology looks at the molecular mechanisms behind processes such as replication, transcription, translation and cell function. One way to describe the basis of molecular biology is to say it concerns understanding how genes are transcribed into RNA and how RNA is then translated into protein. However, this simplified picture is currently be reconsidered and revised due to new discoveries concerning the roles of RNA. Central Dogma (Gene Expression): The central dogma of molecular biology explains that the information flow for genes is from the DNA genetic code to an intermediate RNA copy and then to the proteins synthesized from the code. The key ideas underlying the dogma were first proposed by British molecular biologist Francis Crick in 1958. Replication : DNA replication The formation of new and, hopefully, identical copies of complete genomes. DNA replication occurs every time a cell divides to form two daughter cells. Under the influence of enzymes, DNA unwinds and the two strands separate over short lengths to form numerous replication forks, each of which is called a replicon. The separated strands are temporarily sealed with protein to prevent re-attachment. A short RNA sequence called a primer is formed for each strand at the fork. These primers provide a free 3'- OH end on which the new complementary sequence can be formed along the strand. The LEADING STRAND is synthesized continuously in the 5’ to 3’ direction, working towards the fork direction with removal of the RNA primers as the parental duplex is unwound. The LAGGING STRAND is synthesized discontinuously in the opposite direction as short fragments called Okazaki fragments. Lagging strand synthesis requires extension of the primer, then removal of the primers and gap filling. At least 20 different enzymes and factors, including DNA helicases, DNA polymerases, RNA primases, DNA TOPOISOMERASES and DNA ligases are involved in the complex process of DNA replication. DNA Transcription Takes Place in the Nucleus: The DNA helix that encodes the organism’s genetic information is located in the nucleus of eukaryotic cells. Prokaryotic cells are cells that don't have a nucleus, so DNA transcription, translation and protein synthesis all take place in the cell's cytoplasm via a similar (but simpler) transcription/translation process. In eukaryotic cells, DNA molecules can’t leave the nucleus, so cells have to copy the genetic code to synthesize proteins in the cell outside the nucleus. The transcription copying process is initiated by an enzyme called RNA polymerase. Post-transcriptional modification or co-transcriptional modification is a set of biological processes common to most eukaryotic cells by which an RNA primary transcript is chemically altered following transcription from a gene to produce a mature, functional RNA molecule that can then leave the nucleus and perform any of a variety of different functions in the cell. [1] There are many types of post-transcriptional modifications achieved through a diverse class of molecular mechanisms Perhaps the most notable example is the conversion of precursor messenger RNA transcripts into mature messenger RNA that is subsequently capable of being translated into protein. This process includes three major steps that significantly modify the chemical structure of the RNA molecule: the addition of a 5' cap, the addition of a 3' polyadenylated tail, and RNA splicing. Such processing is vital for the correct translation of eukaryotic genomes because the initial precursor mRNA produced by transcription often contains both exons (coding sequences) and introns (non-coding sequences); splicing removes the introns and links the exons directly, while the cap and tail facilitate the transport of the mRNA to a ribosome and protect it from molecular degradation. [2] Post-transcriptional modifications may also occur during the processing of other transcripts which ultimately become transfer RNA, ribosomal RNA, or any of the other types of RNA used by the cell. The structure of a eukaryotic protein-coding gene. Regulatory sequence controls when and where expression occurs for the protein coding region (red). Promoter and enhancer regions (yellow) regulate the transcription of the gene into a pre-mRNA which is modified to remove introns (light grey) and add a 5' cap and poly-A tail (dark grey). The mRNA 5' and 3' untranslated regions (blue) regulate translation into the final protein product.[3] The structure of a prokaryotic operon of protein-coding genes. Regulatory sequence controls when expression occurs for the multiple protein coding regions (red). Promoter, operator and enhancer regions (yellow) regulate the transcription of the gene into an mRNA. The mRNA untranslated regions (blue) regulate translation into the final protein products.[3] mRNA processing: The pre-mRNA molecule undergoes three main modifications. These modifications are 5' capping, 3' polyadenylation, and RNA splicing, which occur in the cell nucleus before the RNA is translated.[4] 5' processing: Capping Capping of the pre-mRNA involves the addition of 7-methylguanosine (m7G) to the 5' end. To achieve this, the terminal 5' phosphate requires removal, which is done with the aid of a phosphatase enzyme. The enzyme guanosyl transferase then catalyses the reaction, which produces the diphosphate 5' end. The diphosphate 5' end then attacks the alpha phosphorus atom of a GTP molecule in order to add the guanine residue in a 5'5' triphosphate link. The enzyme (guanine-N7-)-methyltransferase ("cap MTase") transfers a methyl group from S-adenosyl methionine to the guanine ring.[5] This type of cap, with just the (m7G) in position is called a cap 0 structure. The ribose of the adjacent nucleotide may also be methylated to give a cap 1. Methylation of nucleotides downstream of the RNA molecule produce cap 2, cap 3 structures and so on. In these cases the methyl groups are added to the 2' OH groups of the ribose sugar. The cap protects the 5' end of the primary RNA transcript from attack by ribonucleases that have specificity to the 3'5' phosphodiester bonds.[6] 3' processing: Cleavage and polyadenylation The pre-mRNA processing at the 3' end of the RNA molecule involves cleavage of its 3' end and then the addition of about 250 adenine residues to form a poly(A) tail. The cleavage and adenylation reactions occur primarily if a polyadenylation signal sequence (5'- AAUAAA-3') is located near the 3' end of the pre-mRNA molecule, which is followed by another sequence, which is usually (5'-CA-3') and is the site of cleavage. A GU-rich sequence is also usually present further downstream on the pre-mRNA molecule. More recently, it has been demonstrated that alternate signal sequences such as UGUA upstream off the cleavage site can also direct cleavage and polyadenylation in the absence of the AAUAAA signal. It is important to understand that these two signals are not mutually independent and often coexist. After the synthesis of the sequence elements, several multi-subunit proteins are transferred to the RNA molecule. The transfer of these sequence specific binding proteins cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor (CPSF), Cleavage Factor I (CF I) and cleavage stimulation factor (CStF) occurs from RNA Polymerase II. The three factors bind to the sequence elements. The AAUAAA signal is directly bound by CPSF. For UGUA dependent processing sites, binding of the multi protein complex is done by Cleavage Factor I (CF I). The resultant protein complex formed contains additional cleavage factors and the enzyme Polyadenylate Polymerase (PAP). This complex cleaves the RNA between the polyadenylation sequence and the GU-rich sequence at the cleavage site marked by the (5'- CA-3') sequences. Poly(A) polymerase then adds about 200 adenine units to the new 3' end of the RNA molecule using ATP as a precursor. As the poly(A) tail is synthesized, it binds multiple copies of poly(A)-binding protein, which protects the 3'end from ribonuclease digestion by enzymes including the CCR4-Not complex.[6] Introns Splicing: RNA splicing is the process by which introns, regions of RNA that do not code for proteins, are removed from the pre-mRNA and the remaining exons connected to re-form a single continuous molecule. Exons are sections of mRNA which become "expressed" or translated into a protein. They are the coding portions of a mRNA molecule.[7] Although most RNA splicing occurs after the complete synthesis and end-capping of the pre-mRNA, transcripts with many exons can be spliced co-transcriptionally.[8] The splicing reaction is catalyzed by a large protein complex called the spliceosome assembled from proteins and small nuclear RNA molecules that recognize splice sites in the pre-mRNA sequence. Many pre-mRNAs, including those encoding antibodies, can be spliced in multiple ways to produce different mature mRNAs that encode different protein sequences. This process is known as alternative splicing, and allows production of a large variety of proteins from a limited amount of DNA. Histone mRNA processing: Histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 form the core of a nucleosome and thus are called core histones. Processing of core histones is done differently because typical histone mRNA lacks several features of other eukaryotic mRNAs, such as poly(A) tail and introns. Thus, such mRNAs do not undergo splicing and their 3' processing is done independent of most cleavage and polyadenylation factors. Core histone mRNAs have a special stem-loop structure at 3-prime end that is recognized by a stem–loop binding protein and a downstream sequence, called histone downstream element (HDE) that recruits U7 snRNA.
Recommended publications
  • Subcellular RNA Profiling Links Splicing and Nuclear DICER1 to Alternative Cleavage and Polyadenylation
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on September 23, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Subcellular RNA profiling links splicing and nuclear DICER1 to alternative cleavage and polyadenylation Jonathan Neve1#, Kaspar Burger2#, Wencheng Li3, Mainul Hoque3, Radhika Patel1, Bin Tian3, Monika Gullerova2* and Andre Furger1* Affiliations: 1 Department of Biochemistry, South Parks Road, University of Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK 2 Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, South Parks Road, University of Oxford, OX1 3RE, UK 3Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA *Corresponding authors: Andre Furger Email: [email protected] Monika Gullerova Email: [email protected] # authors contributed equally Running Title: APA and subcellular fractionation Key words: alternative polyadenylation, mRNA, subcellular fractionation, DICER1 1 Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on September 23, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press ABSTRACT Alternative cleavage and polyadenylation (APA) plays a crucial role in the regulation of gene expression across eukaryotes. Although APA is extensively studied, its regulation within cellular compartments and its physiological impact remains largely enigmatic. Here, we employed a rigorous subcellular fractionation approach to compare APA profiles of cytoplasmic and nuclear RNA fractions from human cell lines. This approach allowed us to extract APA isoforms that are subjected to differential regulation and provided us with a platform to interrogate the molecular regulatory pathways that shape APA profiles in different subcellular locations. Here we show that APA isoforms with shorter 3’UTRs tend to be overrepresented in the cytoplasm and appear to be cell type specific events.
    [Show full text]
  • News & Views Research
    NEWS & VIEWS RESEARCH may exhibit some tissue specificity in humans. Upstream intron Downstream intron a Sibley et al. found that genes with long introns sequence sequence tend to be expressed in the human nervous Precursor RNA system, and they identified recursively spliced 3' Splice 5' Splice RNAs expressed in the human brain6. Duff site site First step et al. detected some selectivity for recursive splicing in the brain in a screen of 20 human tissues (including fetal brain and adult cerebel- Second step lum), but this may partly reflect the difficulty of detecting recursively spliced RNAs in tis- Mature mRNA sues that express such RNAs at low levels. It will be important to determine whether this b RS exon specificity, if real, results from the tendency of recursively spliced genes to be expressed in the brain, or whether cells in the nervous system have factors that promote recursive Competing 5' splice sites First step splicing. Many genes that have long introns, including those that undergo recursive splicing, are linked to neurological diseases and to Second step 9–11 Second step autism . Whether these conditions are sometimes triggered by errors in the multi- step recursive RNA-splicing process will be an exciting avenue for future studies. ■ NMD Heidi Cook-Andersen and Miles F. Wilkinson are in the Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of Figure 1 | Mechanisms of recursive splicing. a, In recursive splicing, long intron sequences of precursor California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, RNA are removed in a stepwise process mediated by juxtaposed internal 3ʹ and 5ʹ splice sites. In the first step, 92093, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reciprocal Regulation Between Splicing and 3-End Processing
    Advanced Review The reciprocal regulation between splicing and 30-end processing Daisuke Kaida* Most eukaryotic precursor mRNAs are subjected to RNA processing events, including 50-end capping, splicing and 30-end processing. These processing events were historically studied independently; however, since the early 1990s tremendous efforts by many research groups have revealed that these processing factors interact with each other to control each other’s functions. U1 snRNP and its components negatively regulate polyadenylation of precursor mRNAs. Impor- tantly, this function is necessary for protecting the integrity of the transcriptome and for regulating gene length and the direction of transcription. In addition, physical and functional interactions occur between splicing factors and 30-end processing factors across the last exon. These interactions activate or inhibit spli- cing and 30-end processing depending on the context. Therefore, splicing and 30- end processing are reciprocally regulated in many ways through the complex protein–protein interaction network. Although interesting questions remain, future studies will illuminate the molecular mechanisms underlying the recipro- cal regulation. © 2016 The Authors. WIREs RNA published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. How to cite this article: WIREs RNA 2016, 7:499–511. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1348 INTRODUCTION regulate each other on the transcription apparatus. In addition, because these events are carried out co- n eukaryotic cells, most precursor mRNAs (pre- transcriptionally in most cases, such factors can exist ImRNAs) consist of protein-coding regions, exons, on pre-mRNA just after synthesis of the binding sites 1,2 and intervening regions, introns. The pre-mRNAs of processing factors, suggesting that the factors are subjected to splicing to remove introns and to affect each other on the pre-mRNA.
    [Show full text]
  • (Bsc Zoology and Microbiology) Concept of Introns and Exons
    Unit-5 Molecular Biology (BSc Zoology and Microbiology) Concept of introns and exons Most of the portion of a gene in higher eukaryotes consists of noncoding DNA that interrupts the relatively short segments of coding DNA. The coding sequences are called exons. The noncoding sequences are called introns. Intron: An intron is a portion of a gene that does not code for amino acids An intron is any nucleotide sequence within a gene which is represented in the primary transcript of the gene, but not present in the final processed form. In other words, Introns are noncoding regions of an RNA transcript which are eliminated by splicing before translation. Sequences that are joined together in the final mature RNA after RNA splicing are exons. Introns are very large chunks of RNA within a messenger RNA molecule that interfere with the code of the exons. And these introns get removed from the RNA molecule to leave a string of exons attached to each other so that the appropriate amino acids can be encoded for. Introns are rare in genes of prokaryotes. #Look carefully at the diagram above, we have already discussed about the modification and processing of eukaryotic RNA. In which 5’ guanine cap and 3’poly A tail is added. So at that time, noncoding regions i.e. introns are removed. We hv done ths already. Ok Exon: The coding sequences are called Exon. An exon is the portion of a gene that codes for amino acids. In the cells of plants and animals, most gene sequences are broken up by one or more DNA sequences called introns.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Perspectives in Intronic Micro Rnas (Mirnas)
    Journal of Biomedical Science (2006) 13:5–15 5 DOI 10.1007/s11373-005-9036-8 Current perspectives in intronic micro RNAs (miRNAs) Shao-Yao Ying & Shi-Lung Lin Department of Cell & Neurobiology, Keck School of Medicine, BMT-403, University of Southern California, 1333 San Pablo Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA Received 27 May 2005; accepted 14 September 2005 Ó 2005 National Science Council, Taipei Key words: fine-tuning of gene function, functional/structural genomics, gene expression, genetic regula- tion, intronic microRNA, miRNA biogenesis, miRNA, post-translational modification, regulatory gene Summary MicroRNAs (miRNAs), small single-stranded regulatory RNAs capable of interfering with intracellular messenger RNAs (mRNAs) that contain either complete or partial complementarity, are useful for the design of new therapies against cancer polymorphism and viral mutation. Numerous miRNAs have been reported to induce RNA interference (RNAi), a post-transcriptional gene silencing mechanism. Intronic miRNAs, derived from introns by RNA splicing and Dicer processing, can interfere with intracellular mRNAs to silence that gene expression. The intronic miRNAs differ uniquely from previously described intergenic miRNAs in the requirement of type II RNA polymerases (Pol-II) and spliceosomal components for its biogenesis. Several kinds of intronic miRNAs have been identified in Caenorhabditis elegans, mouse and human cells; however, neither their function nor application has been reported. To this day, the computer searching program for miRNA seldom include the intronic portion of protein-coding RNAs. The functional significance of artificially generated intronic miRNAs has been successfully ascertained in several biological systems such as zebrafishes, chicken embryos and adult mice, indicating the evolutionary pres- ervation of this gene regulation system in vivo.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Cleavage and Polyadenylation of RNA by CRISPR-Cas13
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/531111; this version posted January 26, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Targeted Cleavage and Polyadenylation of RNA by CRISPR-Cas13 Kelly M. Anderson1,2, Pornthida Poosala1,2, Sean R. Lindley 1,2 and Douglas M. Anderson1,2,* 1Center for RNA Biology, 2Aab Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, U.S.A., 14642 *Corresponding Author: Douglas M. Anderson: [email protected] Keywords: NUDT21, PspCas13b, PAS, CPSF, CFIm, Poly(A), SREBP1 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/531111; this version posted January 26, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Post-transcriptional cleavage and polyadenylation of messenger and long noncoding RNAs is coordinated by a supercomplex of ~20 individual proteins within the eukaryotic nucleus1,2. Polyadenylation plays an essential role in controlling RNA transcript stability, nuclear export, and translation efficiency3-6. More than half of all human RNA transcripts contain multiple polyadenylation signal sequences that can undergo alternative cleavage and polyadenylation during development and cellular differentiation7,8. Alternative cleavage and polyadenylation is an important mechanism for the control of gene expression and defects in 3’ end processing can give rise to myriad human diseases9,10.
    [Show full text]
  • RNA Splice Sites Classification Using Convolutional Neural Network Models
    RNA Splice Sites Classification Using Convolutional Neural Network Models Thanyathorn Thanapattheerakul Worrawat Engchuan Daniele Merico School of Information Technology, The Centre for Applied Genomics, Molecular Diagnostics, King Mongkut’s University of Genetics and Genome Biology, The Deep Genomics, Technology Thonburi, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Bangkok, Thailand Toronto, Ontario, Canada [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Narumol Doungpan Kiyota Hashimoto Jonathan H. Chan Faculty of Engineering, Faculty of Technology and School of Information Technology, King Mongkut’s University of Environment, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Prince of Songkla University, Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand Phuket, Thailand Bangkok, Thailand [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—RNA splicing refers to the elimination of non- completely make it loss of function. The alternative splicing coding region on transcribed pre-messenger ribonucleic acid can produce different functional proteins, which could lead (RNA). Identifying splicing site is an essential step which can to causing abnormal states in human [3]. be used to gain novel insights of alternative splicing as well as Many studies have proposed models to recognize the splicing defects, potentially cause malfunction of protein splice sites to reveal which splice sites contain a mutation resulting from mutations at splice site. In this work, we that may cause a splicing error. One common method to propose a data preprocessing step applying to RNA sequences recognize binding sites in motif sequences is called Position- and the models leveraging Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The preprocessing step includes reducing sequence Weight-Matrix (PWM).
    [Show full text]
  • Widespread Mrna Polyadenylation Events in Introns Indicate Dynamic Interplay Between Polyadenylation and Splicing
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on September 25, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Letter Widespread mRNA polyadenylation events in introns indicate dynamic interplay between polyadenylation and splicing Bin Tian,1 Zhenhua Pan, and Ju Youn Lee Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey 07101, USA mRNA polyadenylation and pre-mRNA splicing are two essential steps for the maturation of most human mRNAs. Studies have shown that some genes generate mRNA variants involving both alternative polyadenylation and alternative splicing. Polyadenylation in introns can lead to conversion of an internal exon to a 3Ј terminal exon, which is termed composite terminal exon, or usage of a 3Ј terminal exon that is otherwise skipped, which is termed skipped terminal exon. Using cDNA/EST and genome sequences, we identified polyadenylation sites in introns for all currently known human genes. We found that ∼20% human genes have at least one intronic polyadenylation event that can potentially lead to mRNA variants, most of which encode different protein products. The conservation of human intronic poly(A) sites in mouse and rat genomes is lower than that of poly(A) sites in 3Ј-most exons. Quantitative analysis of a number of mRNA variants generated by intronic poly(A) sites suggests that the intronic polyadenylation activity can vary under different cellular conditions for most genes. Furthermore, we found that weak 5Ј splice site and large intron size are the determining factors controlling the usage of composite terminal exon poly(A) sites, whereas skipped terminal exon poly(A) sites tend to be associated with strong polyadenylation signals.
    [Show full text]
  • The CTD Role in Cotranscriptional RNA Processing and Surveillance
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector FEBS Letters 582 (2008) 1971–1976 Minireview The CTD role in cotranscriptional RNA processing and surveillance Se´rgio F. de Almeida, Maria Carmo-Fonseca* Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal Received 4 April 2008; revised 13 April 2008; accepted 14 April 2008 Available online 22 April 2008 Edited by Ulrike Kutay proteins specific to each snRNP. The selection of specific splice Abstract In higher eukaryotes, the production of mature mes- senger RNA that exits the nucleus to be translated into protein sites (ss) on a particular pre-mRNA substrate relies on an intri- requires precise and extensive processing of the nascent tran- cate interplay involving the cooperative binding of trans-acting script. The processing steps include 50-end capping, splicing, splicing proteins to cis-acting sequence elements in the pre- and 30-end formation. Pre-mRNA processing is coupled to tran- mRNA. In mammals, an intron is defined by four short and scription by mechanisms that are not well understood but involve poorly conserved consensus sequences: the exon–intron junc- the carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) of the largest subunit of tions (50ss and 30ss); the branch point sequence; and the poly- RNA polymerase II. This review focuses on recent findings that pyrimidine tract (Table 1). These sequences are recognized by provide novel insight into the role of the CTD in promoting RNA base pairing with the spliceosomal snRNAs (Fig. 1). In addi- processing and surveillance. tion, both exons and introns contain weak binding sites for a Ó 2008 Federation of European Biochemical Societies.
    [Show full text]
  • Mrna Editing, Processing and Quality Control in Caenorhabditis Elegans
    | WORMBOOK mRNA Editing, Processing and Quality Control in Caenorhabditis elegans Joshua A. Arribere,*,1 Hidehito Kuroyanagi,†,1 and Heather A. Hundley‡,1 *Department of MCD Biology, UC Santa Cruz, California 95064, †Laboratory of Gene Expression, Medical Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan, and ‡Medical Sciences Program, Indiana University School of Medicine-Bloomington, Indiana 47405 ABSTRACT While DNA serves as the blueprint of life, the distinct functions of each cell are determined by the dynamic expression of genes from the static genome. The amount and specific sequences of RNAs expressed in a given cell involves a number of regulated processes including RNA synthesis (transcription), processing, splicing, modification, polyadenylation, stability, translation, and degradation. As errors during mRNA production can create gene products that are deleterious to the organism, quality control mechanisms exist to survey and remove errors in mRNA expression and processing. Here, we will provide an overview of mRNA processing and quality control mechanisms that occur in Caenorhabditis elegans, with a focus on those that occur on protein-coding genes after transcription initiation. In addition, we will describe the genetic and technical approaches that have allowed studies in C. elegans to reveal important mechanistic insight into these processes. KEYWORDS Caenorhabditis elegans; splicing; RNA editing; RNA modification; polyadenylation; quality control; WormBook TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract 531 RNA Editing and Modification 533 Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing 533 The C. elegans A-to-I editing machinery 534 RNA editing in space and time 535 ADARs regulate the levels and fates of endogenous dsRNA 537 Are other modifications present in C.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Novel Expression Signatures Identified by Transcriptional Analysis
    ARD Online First, published on October 7, 2009 as 10.1136/ard.2009.108043 Ann Rheum Dis: first published as 10.1136/ard.2009.108043 on 7 October 2009. Downloaded from Novel expression signatures identified by transcriptional analysis of separated leukocyte subsets in SLE and vasculitis 1Paul A Lyons, 1Eoin F McKinney, 1Tim F Rayner, 1Alexander Hatton, 1Hayley B Woffendin, 1Maria Koukoulaki, 2Thomas C Freeman, 1David RW Jayne, 1Afzal N Chaudhry, and 1Kenneth GC Smith. 1Cambridge Institute for Medical Research and Department of Medicine, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0XY, UK 2Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9PS, UK Correspondence should be addressed to Dr Paul Lyons or Prof Kenneth Smith, Department of Medicine, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0XY, UK. Telephone: +44 1223 762642, Fax: +44 1223 762640, E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] Key words: Gene expression, autoimmune disease, SLE, vasculitis Word count: 2,906 The Corresponding Author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors and does grant on behalf of all authors, an exclusive licence (or non-exclusive for government employees) on a worldwide basis to the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and its Licensees to permit this article (if accepted) to be published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases and any other BMJPGL products to exploit all subsidiary rights, as set out in their licence (http://ard.bmj.com/ifora/licence.pdf). http://ard.bmj.com/ on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. 1 Copyright Article author (or their employer) 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms Note: Words in Bold in a Definition Indicate Terms Also Defined in This Glossary
    Glossary of Terms Note: Words in bold in a definition indicate terms also defined in this Glossary Term Definition “3 prime”; Refers to carbon 3 of the nucleic acid sugar component (either ribose in RNA or deoxyribose in DNA) to which additional nucleotides may be added by 3' polymerase, often used to refer to that end of a single-stranded DNA or RNA molecule where the 3' carbon retains its hydroxyl group (-OH) and no further nucleotides are bonded. “5 prime”; Refers to carbon 5 of the nucleic acid sugar component (either ribose in RNA or deoxyribose in DNA), to which the triphosphate is attached in a nucleotide 5' triphosphate, often used to refer to that end of a single-stranded DNA or RNA molecule where the 5' carbon's phosphate group(s) is/are unattached to a preceding nucleotide. The inclusion or exclusion of certain exons in the splicing reactions that determine the sequences included in the final mRNA product. This mechanism is utilized to generate a series of closely related protein isoforms, which differ by the inclusion alternative splicing or exclusion of the particular protein regions encoded by those exons. Alternative splicing is directed by RNA-binding proteins that may block, or stimulate, utilization of a particular splice site. The basic building block of proteins, a small molecule with a -C-C- core, an amine group (-NH2) at one end and a carboxylic acid group (-COOH) at the other end. The amino acid general structure can be represented as NH2-CHR-COOH, where R can be any of 20 different functional groups of acidic, basic, or nonpolar character.
    [Show full text]