DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix N2 Nature Conservation Gas Transmission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix N2 Nature Conservation Gas Transmission FINAL REPORT Santos GLNG Ecological Assessment Report – Pipeline Flora Prepared for Santos Ltd Santos House Level 14 60 Edward Street Brisbane QLD 4000 11 February 2009 42626220 C:\Documents and Settings\rxborge0\My Documents\URS Report front cover for pdf.doc GLNG ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT PIPELINE FLORA Project Manager: URS Australia Pty Ltd Level 16, 240 Queen Street Brisbane, QLD 4000 GPO Box 302, QLD 4001 Dan Simmons Australia Associate Environmental T: 61 7 3243 2111 Scientist F: 61 7 3243 2199 Project Director: Chris Pigott Senior Principal Author: Date: 11 February 2009 Reference: 42626230 Status: Final Chris Todd Senior Ecologist Prepared for Santos, 11 February 2009 GLNG ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT PIPELINE FLORA Table of Contents Table of Contents ES Executive Summary ......................................................................................... 1 1 Glossary and Abbreviations............................................................................ 1 Abbreviations............................................................................................................................... 1 Glossary ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Study Aim and Objectives.............................................................................................. 4 2.2 Review of Existing Information ..................................................................................... 4 2.3 Target Species................................................................................................................. 4 2.4 Legislative Context ......................................................................................................... 5 2.4.1 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999 (EPBC Act).................................................................................................................... 5 2.4.2 Nature Conservation Act, 1992 (NC Act).......................................................... 5 2.4.3 Lands Protection Act, 2002 (LP Act) ................................................................ 5 2.4.4 Vegetation Management Act, 1999 (VM Act) ................................................... 6 2.5 Field Survey Approach................................................................................................... 8 2.5.1 Survey Limitations ............................................................................................ 9 2.5.2 Nomenclature ................................................................................................. 10 3 GLNG Environmental Values......................................................................... 11 3.1 Regional Context........................................................................................................... 11 3.1.1 Bioregion......................................................................................................... 11 3.1.2 Sub-regions .................................................................................................... 11 3.1.3 Regional Ecosystems (REs)........................................................................... 11 3.1.4 Study Site ....................................................................................................... 12 3.1.5 Weather Conditions ........................................................................................ 12 3.2 Survey Results .............................................................................................................. 13 3.2.1 Species Diversity ............................................................................................ 13 3.2.2 Regional Ecosystems ..................................................................................... 14 3.2.3 Weeds of Concern.......................................................................................... 16 3.2.4 Vegetation of Significance .............................................................................. 16 3.2.5 Regional Connectivity..................................................................................... 16 4 Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures................................................. 16 4.1 Potential Impacts .......................................................................................................... 16 Prepared for Santos, 11 February 2009 i GLNG ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT PIPELINE FLORA Table of Contents 4.1.1 Proposed Development .................................................................................. 16 4.1.2 Vegetation Disturbance .................................................................................. 16 4.1.3 Impacts to Conservation Significant Species ................................................. 16 4.1.4 Dust Impacts................................................................................................... 16 4.1.5 Fragmentation................................................................................................. 16 4.1.6 Impact to Marine Plants .................................................................................. 16 4.1.7 Weed Impacts................................................................................................. 16 4.1.8 Edge Effects.................................................................................................... 16 4.1.9 Impacts associated with changes to fire regimes........................................... 16 4.1.10 Impacts associated with Erosion and Sedimentation ..................................... 16 4.2 Impact Mitigation........................................................................................................... 16 4.2.1 Pipeline Route Selection................................................................................. 16 4.2.2 Further Surveys .............................................................................................. 16 4.2.3 Clearing Scheme ............................................................................................ 16 4.2.4 Weed Control.................................................................................................. 16 4.2.5 Rehabilitation of Disturbed Areas ................................................................... 16 4.2.6 Biodiversity Offsetting ..................................................................................... 16 4.2.7 Cumulative Impacts ........................................................................................ 16 5 References ...................................................................................................... 16 Prepared for Santos, 11 February 2009 ii GLNG ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT PIPELINE FLORA Tables, Figures, Appendices Tables, Figures, Appendices Tables Table 3-1 Regional Ecosystems recorded within 100 m buffer of gas transmission pipeline.........................14 Table 3-2 Declared exotic weeds present along gas transmission pipeline ...................................................16 Table 3-3 Conservation Significant species recorded from gas transmission pipeline...................................16 Table 3-4 Significant Vegetation Communities recorded within 100 m buffer along gas transmission pipeline ........................................................................................................................................................16 Table 4-1 Proposed area of vegetation communities to be removed from the gas transmission pipeline .....16 Figures Figures 1 - 3 Significant Flora Species Records (HERBRECS) Figures 4 - 28 Regional Ecosystem Mapping Appendices Appendix A Pipeline Flora Survey (A1 – Potentially occurring significant species, A2 – Flora Survey Methodology, A3 – Regional Ecosystem Survey Data) Appendix B Master Flora Species List Prepared for Santos, 11 February 2009 iii GLNG ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT PIPELINE FLORA Executive Summary ES Executive Summary The flora assessment of the gas transmission pipeline comprised a desktop assessment and a detailed flora field survey. The aims of the investigation were to map the Regional Ecosystems of the gas transmission pipeline corridor and identify vegetation or species of conservation significance. In addition, the survey sought to identify pest plants in the study area and discuss potential impacts and outline mitigation strategies. A desktop study identified flora species potentially present, including significant species listed under the Queensland Nature Conservation Act, 1992 (NC Act) and the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999 (EPBC Act). The flora field survey utilised standard sampling techniques for the mapping of Regional Ecosystems. The field survey was conducted over a 32 day period and included 126 survey sites. The desktop assessment identified sixty-eight significant flora species as potentially present within the pipeline study area. Of these identified taxa, two species (Cycas megacarpa and Acacia pedleyi) were located during the field surveys. The field survey identified the presence of 47 Regional Ecosystems within the gas transmission pipeline corridor including 18 listed as ‘Endangered’ or ‘Of Concern’ under the Vegetation Management Act 1999 (VM Act) and/or EPBC Act. The field survey identified 302 taxa of plants, representing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dr. R. JEYACHANDRAN 2. Date of Birth
    CURRICULUM VITAE 1. Name : Dr. R. JEYACHANDRAN 2. Date of Birth : 07-05-1960 3. Present Position : Associate Professor and Head 4. Department : Botany 5. Field(s) of Specialization: Plant Biotechnology Biochemistry Bioinformatics 6. Educational Background: Subject of study/ Year Percentage/ Degree Research University Conferred Grade Specialisation B.Sc. Botany Madras 1981 ‘O’ Grade 82% M.Sc. Botany Madras 1983 ‘O’ Grade 75% Ph.D. Physiology & Bharathidasan 1988 Commendable Biochemistry PGDBI Bioinformatics Bharathiar 2003 I Class 7. Employment record: Designation / Employer Period Nature of assignment St.Joseph’s College, Tiruchirappalli-620002 1987-1992 Lecturer St.Joseph’s College, Tiruchirappalli-620002 1992-1998 Senior Lecturer St.Joseph’s College, Tiruchirappalli-620002 1998 - 2005 Reader St.Joseph’s College, Tiruchirappalli-620002 2006- Till date Associate Professor 2010-2011 Coordinator, M.Phil. Biotechnology June 2011 Head, Dept.of Botany onwards 2 8. Teaching Experience: Under graduate level: B.Sc. Plant Biology and Biotechnology : 24 years Post graduate level: M.Sc. Plant Biology and Biotechnology : 24 years M.Sc. Biochemistry : 19 years M.Sc. Biotechnology : 10 years M.Phil: Plant Biology and Biotechnology : 24 years M.Phil: Biotechnology : 5 years Ph.D.: Plant Biotechnology, Phytochemistry and Microbiology : 24 years C). Research Output National 1.Jeyachandran, R., Stephen, J. and George, V.K. (1988). Chemostress induced biochemical changes in Chara hispida, perspective in Phycology. V.N.Rajarao (Ed.), Today and Tomorrow’s Printers and Publishers, New Delhi. pp 221-222. 2.Thangeswaran, A., Jeyachandran, R. and George, V.K. (1991): A preliminary investigation on UV-filters in two cultivars of mung bean. Environment and Ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description
    Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description 2010 Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this ECD are correct, the Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Department of the Environment does not guarantee and accepts no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to the currency, accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the information in this ECD. Note: There may be differences in the type of information contained in this ECD publication, to those of other Ramsar wetlands. © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2010. The ‘Ecological Character Description for the Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site: Final Report’ is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This report should be attributed as ‘BMT WBM. (2010). Ecological Character Description of the Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site. Prepared for the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts.’ The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Ecological Character Description for the Shoalwater and
    [Show full text]
  • Population Biology of Phoma Betae and Management Strategies for Phoma Leaf Spot of Table Beet in New York
    POPULATION BIOLOGY OF PHOMA BETAE AND MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR PHOMA LEAF SPOT OF TABLE BEET IN NEW YORK A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Lori Blair Koenick May 2019 © 2019 Lori Blair Koenick ABSTRACT Phoma betae, causative agent of seedling, foliar, and root diseases, is an important pathogen of table and sugar beet worldwide. Little is known of the epidemiology and management of diseases caused by P. betae in New York (NY) table beet production systems. This research was conducted to understand the population biology of P. betae in table beet in NY and evaluate management options for the foliar disease caused by P. betae, Phoma leaf spot (PLS). Microsatellite and mating type markers were developed to genotype P. betae populations, and population biology analysis was performed to investigate hypotheses concerning pathogen biology and the role of various inoculum sources in PLS epidemics. High genetic diversity and moderate differentiation was observed among populations, along with evidence for a mixed reproductive mode. Development of these genetic tools will facilitate future studies targeting specific epidemiological questions. Field surveys were conducted in the summers of 2017 and 2018 to estimate prevalence, incidence, and severity of PLS epidemics in conventional and organic NY table beet production systems. PLS was found in 35 of 60 fields with incidence up to 31% in affected fields. The prevalence of PLS in organic table beet fields (74%) was higher than in conventional fields (49%). This research also focused on the potential of cultivar resistance to form part of an integrated management strategy for PLS in organic production.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT Conservation Assessment and Management Plan Workshop
    REPORT Conservation Assessment and Management Plan Workshop (C.A.M.P. III) for Selected Species of Medicinal Plants of Southern India Bangalore, 16-18 January 1997 Produced by the Participants Edited by Sanjay Molur and Sally Walker with assistance from B. V. Shetty, C. G. Kushalappa, S. Armougame, P. S. Udayan, Purshottam Singh, S. N. Yoganarasimhan, Keshava Murthy, V. S. Ramachandran, M D. Subash Chandran, K. Ravikumar, A. E. Shanawaz Khan June 1997 Foundation for Revitalisation of Local Health Traditions ZOO/ Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, India Medicinal Plants Specialist Group, SSC, IUCN CONTENTS Section I Executive Summary Summary Data Tables List of Participants Activities of FRLHT using 1995 and 1996 CAMP species results Commitments : suggested species for further assessment CAMP Definition FRLHT's Priority List of Plants Role of collaborating organisations Section II Report and Discussion Definitions of Taxon Data Sheet terminology Appendix I Taxon Data Sheets IUCN Guidelines Section I Executive Summary, Summary Data Table, and Related material Executive Summary The Convention on Biological Diversity signed by 150 states in Rio de Janerio in 1992 calls on signatories to identify and components of their state biodiversity and prioritise ecosystems and habitats, species and communities and genomes of social, scientific and economic value. The new IUCN Red List criteria have been revised by IUCN to reflect the need for greater objectivity and precision when categorising species for conservation action. The CAMP process, developed by the Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, has emerged as an effective, flexible, participatory and scientific methodology for conducting species prioritisation exercises using the IUCN criteria. Since 1995, the Foundation for Revitalisation of Local Health Traditions has been con- ducting CAMP Workshops for one of the major groups of conservation concern, medici- nal plants.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Queensland QLD Page 1 of 89 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region South West Queensland, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 -IJBMRF20182447 Rajeev Ramchandra Kolgi
    Int J Biol Med Res.2019 ;10(1):6631-6634 Int J Biol Med Res www.biomedscidirect.com Volume 10, Issue 1, Jan 2019 Contents lists available at BioMedSciDirect Publications International Journal of Biological & Medical Research Journal homepage: www.biomedscidirect.com BioMedSciDirect International Journal of Publications BIOLOGICAL AND MEDICAL RESEARCH Original article Therapeutic properties of extracts of Leucas aspera and Anisomeles malabarica Rajeev Ramchandra Kolgia,c, Shivakumar S La, Sajeeda Niketha,c, Shivaraj Y3and Chandrakant S. Karigarb* aDepartment of P.G. Studies and Research in Biochemistry, Tumkur University, Tumkur, 572103, India. bDepartment of P.G. Studies and Research in Biochemistry, Bangalore University, Bengaluru, 560056, India. cDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Government Science College, Bengaluru, 560001, India. A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Keywords: Leaves of two plant extracts from Leucas aspera and Anisomeles malabarica are studied for Phytochemical analysis their therapeutic activity. These plants have been evaluated for antibacterial property against Leucas aspera Anisomeles malabarica Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The plant extracts showed low antibacterial antibacterial effects on the selected microbes. However, the methanol leaf extracts showed significant anticancer antibacterial activity. The determination of anticancer activity showed that the plants are poor zone of inhibition. in substances with appreciable therapeutic potential. c Copyright 2010 BioMedSciDirect Publications IJBMR - ISSN: 0976:6685. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Leaves of plants with varied therapeutic potential have known to The plant leaves are found active against convulsions, colic, for benefit humans. These plants are selected as they are known to dyspepsia in intermittent fevers, boils, tetanus, inflammation, possess useful properties like anti-inflammatory, anti-cytotoxic, cough, cold, stomachache, itches and in uterine affections.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materialsupplementary Material
    Supplementary Materials 10.1071/RJ16076_AC © CSIRO 2017 Supplementary Material: Rangeland Journal, 2017, 39(1), 85–95. Assessing the invasion threat of non-native plant species in protected areas using Herbarium specimen and ecological survey data. A case study in two rangeland bioregions in Queensland Michael R. NgugiA,B and Victor John NeldnerA AQueensland Herbarium, Department of Science Information Technology and Innovation, Mt Coot- tha Road, Toowong, Qld 4066, Australia. BCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Table S1. List of native species in Cape York Peninsula and Desert Uplands bioregions Cape York Peninsula native Species Desert Uplands native Species Abelmoschus ficulneus Abelmoschus ficulneus Abelmoschus moschatus subsp. Tuberosus Abildgaardia ovata Abildgaardia ovata Abildgaardia vaginata Abildgaardia vaginata Abutilon arenarium Abrodictyum brassii Abutilon calliphyllum Abrodictyum obscurum Abutilon fraseri Abroma molle Abutilon hannii Abrophyllum ornans Abutilon leucopetalum Abrus precatorius L. subsp. precatorius Abutilon malvifolium Abutilon albescens Abutilon nobile Domin Abutilon auritum Abutilon otocarpum Abutilon micropetalum Abutilon oxycarpum Acacia armillata Abutilon oxycarpum Acacia armitii Abutilon oxycarpum var. incanum Acacia aulacocarpa Abutilon oxycarpum var. subsagittatum Acacia auriculiformis Acacia acradenia Acacia brassii Acacia adsurgens Acacia calyculata Acacia aneura F.Muell. ex Benth. var. aneura Acacia celsa Acacia aneura var. major Pedley Acacia chisholmii Acacia angusta Maiden
    [Show full text]
  • Cattle Creek Ecological Assessment Report
    CATTLE CREEK CCCATTLE CCCREEK RRREGIONAL EEECOSYSTEM AND FFFUNCTIONALITY SSSURVEY Report prepared for Santos GLNG Feb 2021 Terrestria Pty Ltd, PO Box 328, Wynnum QLD 4178 Emai : admin"terrestria.com.au This page left blank for double-sided printing purposes. Terrestria Pty Ltd, PO Box 328, Wynnum QLD 4178 Emai : admin"terrestria.com.au Document Control Sheet Project Number: 0213 Project Manager: Andrew Daniel Client: Santos Report Title: Cattle Creek Regional Ecosystem and Functionality Survey Project location: Cattle Creek, Bauhinia, Southern Queensland Project Author/s: Andrew Daniel Project Summary: Assessment of potential ecological constraints to well pad location, access and gathering. Document preparation and distribution history Document version Date Completed Checked By Issued By Date sent to client Draft A 04/09/2020 AD AD 04/09/2020 Draft B Final 02/02/2021 AD AD 02/02/2021 Notice to users of this report CopyrighCopyright: This document is copyright to Terrestria Pty Ltd. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Terrestria Pty Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the express permission of Terrestria Pty Ltd constitutes a breach of the Copyright Act 1968. Report LimitationsLimitations: This document has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Santos Pty Ltd. Terrestria Pty Ltd accept no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. Signed on behalf of Terrestria Pty Ltd Dr Andrew Daniel Managing Director Date: 02 February 2021 Terrestria Pty Ltd File No: 0213 CATTLE CREEK REGIONAL ECOSYSTEM AND FUNCTIONALITY SURVEY Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hassk. and Anisomeles Malabarica (L.) R. BR. Ex S
    ZJournal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017; 6(6): 1942-1945 E-ISSN: 2278-4136 P-ISSN: 2349-8234 Phytochemical analysis of secondary metabolites on JPP 2017; 6(6): 1942-1945 Received: 19-09-2017 Pogostemon auricularis (L.) Hassk. and Anisomeles Accepted: 20-10-2017 malabarica (L.) R. BR. ex Sims K Kamaleswari PG & Research Department of Botany, National College, K Kamaleswari and V Nandagopalan Tiruchirappalli-1, Tamil Nadu, India Abstract V Nandagopalan The present study was made an attempt to compare the preliminary phytochemical constituents of the PG & Research Department of leaf extracts of two extreme environments such as: hydrophytic (Pogostemon auricularis) and xeric Botany, National College, (Anisomeles malabarica) plants. The dried leaf sample was extracted with three different solvents such as Tiruchirappalli-1, Tamil Nadu, petroleum ether, methanol and water. The quantitative analysis of the total phenolics, flavonoids, tannin India and alkaloids were assayed using the standard protocols. The maximum yield of extract (28% W/W) was record in P. auricularis of methanol extract. But, the A. malabarica showed maximum (20% W/W) extraction in methanol extract. Of the different solvent extractions the highest concentration secondary metabolite was identified with the total phenolic content in methanol extract of P. auricularis (54.59±0.5 (mg GAE/g extract) and A. malabarica of (48.28±0.5 mg GAE/g extract) respectively. The present investigation found that the remarkable variation in flavonoids, tannin and alkaloids. It may pave a new way to identify the novel secondary metabolites. Keywords: Secondary metabolites, Pogostemon auricularis, Anisomeles malabarica, Phenolics, Alkaloids, Lamiaceae. 1. Introduction The medicinal plants are the repository for bioactive compounds, which are exclusive source for phytodrugs and it has many selective advantages over the synthetic drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • European Journal of Environmental Ecology ECOLOGICAL
    Jayakumar M and Karuppusamy S. / European Journal of Environmental Ecology. 2015;2(3):128-136. e - ISSN – 2393-9672 Print ISSN - XXXX-XXXX European Journal of Environmental Ecology Journal homepage: www.mcmed.us/journal/ejee ECOLOGICAL DISTRIBUTION OF TRADITIONAL MEDICINAL PLANTS IN ALAGAR HILLS OF EASTERN GHATS, TAMILNADU M. Jayakumar1* and S. Karuppusamy2 1Department of Biology, PMT College, Usilampatti, Tamilnadu, India. 2Department of Botany, Botanical Research Centre, The Madura College, Madurai- 625 011, Tamilnadu, India. Corresponding Author Article Info S. Karuppusamy Received 13/05/2015; Revised 29/06/2015 Email:- [email protected] Accepted 11/07/2015 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Alagar hills of Eastern Ghats with tropical dry India harbours a great diversity of medicinal deciduous and scrub forests landscape provides a suitable plants because of biodiversity rich hot spots of Eastern habitat for growth of number of medicinal plants. A total Himalaya and Western Ghats lying in Indian of 146 traditional medicinal species including 145 subcontinent. So far, about 8500 species of angiosperms and one gymnosperm were identified from Anagiosperms, 44 species of Gymnosperms, and 700 the study area representing 114 genera and 52 families. species of Pteridophytes have been reported as medicinal The habits of these 146 medicinal plants comprised of 53 species in India. There has been exploiting a variety of herbs, 23 shrubs, 33 trees and 37 climbers. Ecological herbals for effective treatment of various ailments since diversity index (IVI) indicates the quantitative distribution the time immemorial. The uses of plant medicines in India of medicinal plants in different forest types of the study is deep rooted on traditional knowledge and codified area whereas dominant IVI were noted for trees like medicinal systems like Siddha and Ayurveda was Lannea coromandelica, Phyllanthus emblica and prescribed more than 900 medicinal plants species which Syzygium cumini.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicinal Plants of Sacred Groves in Kanyakumari District Southern Western Ghats
    Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge Vol. 9 (2), April 2010, pp. 294-299 Medicinal plants of sacred groves in Kanyakumari district Southern Western Ghats S Sukumaran 1* & A D S Raj 2 1Department of Botany, Nesamony Memorial Christian College, Marthandam 629 165, Kanyakumari district, Tamil Nadu 2Department of Botany and Research Centre, Scott Christian College, Nagercoil 629 003, Tamil Nadu E-mail: [email protected] Received 5 December 2007; revised 16 July 2009 An attempt has been made to identify folklore medicinally important plants frequently used by rural communities of sacred groves and it environs of Kanyakumari district, Tamil Nadu. A total of 34 medicinal plants from 33 genera under 29 families were enumerated. Most of the plants are used for curing earache, skin diseases, fever, cold, headache, cough, urinary disorder, ulcer, etc. Of 29 families, 26 families were nonspecific. Plants of Rutaceae was largely represented (4 species), followed by Euphorbiaceae and Sapindaceae. Keywords: Ethnomedicine, Biodiversity, Folk medicine, Indigenous knowledge, Kanyakumari, Medicinal plants, Sacred groves, Western Ghats IPC Int. Cl. 7: A61K35/78, A61P1/02, A61P1/04, A61P1/10, A61P1/14, A61P1/16, A61P9/14, A61P11/00, A61P15/00, A61P31/00, A61P39/02 In recent years, there has been an increasing used as folk medicines throughout the world since awareness that the significance of medical plant ages. Only 15% of pharmaceutical drugs are studies goes beyond mere anthropological curiosity. consumed in developing countries, and relatively In Africa 80% of the population depend principally on more affluent people take a large proportion of it 7. It herbal medicine; this situation is likely to continue 1.
    [Show full text]
  • BOTANICAL INVESTIGATION of Appendices Bibliography
    BOTANICAL INVESTIGATION OF NEW SOUTH WALES 1811-1880 Volume III Appendices Bibliography L.A. Gilbert, September, 1971. APPENDICES I N.S.W. Collectors acknowledged by George Bentham in Flora Australiensis 1 II Allan Cunninghams Letter to Sir Joseph Banks, 1 December 1817 12 III Manna 15 IV Plants collected during Mitchell's First Three Expeditions, 1831-1836, and described by Dr John Lindley as new species, 1838 25 V Plants collected during Sturts Expedition into the Interior, 1844-1846, and described by Robert Brown, 1849 30 VI Plants described as new from the Collection made by Sir Thomas Mitchell during his Tropical Australia Expedition, 1845-1846 33 VII William Stephenson, M.R.C.S., Surgeon and Naturalist 41 VIII A Sample of Nineteenth Century Uses for Certain N.S.W. Plants indicating the diverse ways in which the settlers used the bush to supply some basic needs 46 IX Further Examples of Bush Buildings 179 X Notes on Captain Daniel Woodriffs "Extracts from Mr Moores Report to Gov. Macquarie on Timber fit for Naval Purposes" 187 XI Lieut. James Tuckey's Report on N.S.W. Timber, 1802-1804 190 XII "List of Prevailing Timber Trees of New South Wales", c.1820. J.T. Bigge: Report (Appendix) 195 XIII Expansion of Settlement in N.S.W. due to the occurrence of Red Cedar 199 XIV Visits by Non-British Scientific and Survey Expeditions to N.S.W., 1788-1858 . 202 XV Botanical Names and Authors of Plants mentioned in this Study 207 APPENDIX I. N.S.I. COLLECTORS ACKNOWLEDGED BY GEORGE BENTHAM IN FLORA AUSTRALIENSIS "Wc find the botanical work of one State sufficiently engrossing, and thus in botanical matters we are rev- ersing the act of federation, which politically unites all our peoples.
    [Show full text]