DOCSLIB.ORG

Cattle Creek Ecological Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cattle Creek Ecological Assessment Report CATTLE CREEK CCCATTLE CCCREEK RRREGIONAL EEECOSYSTEM AND FFFUNCTIONALITY SSSURVEY Report prepared for Santos GLNG Feb 2021 Terrestria Pty Ltd, PO Box 328, Wynnum QLD 4178 Emai : admin"terrestria.com.au This page left blank for double-sided printing purposes. Terrestria Pty Ltd, PO Box 328, Wynnum QLD 4178 Emai : admin"terrestria.com.au Document Control Sheet Project Number: 0213 Project Manager: Andrew Daniel Client: Santos Report Title: Cattle Creek Regional Ecosystem and Functionality Survey Project location: Cattle Creek, Bauhinia, Southern Queensland Project Author/s: Andrew Daniel Project Summary: Assessment of potential ecological constraints to well pad location, access and gathering. Document preparation and distribution history Document version Date Completed Checked By Issued By Date sent to client Draft A 04/09/2020 AD AD 04/09/2020 Draft B Final 02/02/2021 AD AD 02/02/2021 Notice to users of this report CopyrighCopyright: This document is copyright to Terrestria Pty Ltd. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Terrestria Pty Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the express permission of Terrestria Pty Ltd constitutes a breach of the Copyright Act 1968. Report LimitationsLimitations: This document has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Santos Pty Ltd. Terrestria Pty Ltd accept no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. Signed on behalf of Terrestria Pty Ltd Dr Andrew Daniel Managing Director Date: 02 February 2021 Terrestria Pty Ltd File No: 0213 CATTLE CREEK REGIONAL ECOSYSTEM AND FUNCTIONALITY SURVEY Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE.................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROPOSED WORKS .................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 GENERAL PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION .................................................................................. 1 2.0 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................... 2 3.0 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 DESKTOP RESULTS .................................................................................................................... 4 3.1.1 Threatened Flora Species .................................................................................................... 4 3.1.2 Threatened Fauna Species ................................................................................................... 4 3.1.1 Threatened Ecological Communities ................................................................................... 4 3.1.2 Geology ................................................................................................................................ 5 3.1.3 Vegetation Mapping ............................................................................................................ 5 3.1.4 Essential Habitat .................................................................................................................. 5 3.2 FIELD RESULTS .......................................................................................................................... 7 3.2.1 Threatened Flora Species Assessment ................................................................................. 7 3.2.2 Threatened Fauna Species Assessment ............................................................................. 11 3.2.3 Vegetation Community Types and Regional Ecosystems ................................................... 15 4.0 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................... 19 5.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 19 Terrestria Pty Ltd Page i File No: 0213 Cattle Creek Regional Ecosystem and Functionality Survey Cattle Creek Station, Southern Queensland Prepared for Santos Pty Ltd Figures Figure 1.1: Site Location and Project Area Boundary ................................................................................. 3 Figure 3.1: Detailed Surface Geology........................................................................................................ 20 Figure 3.2: State Regional Ecosystem Mapping ........................................................................................ 21 Figures 3.3 A4 – D2: Field Validated Regional Ecosystem Mapping .......................................................... 22 Tables Table 3.1: Project Area Major Geological Units ......................................................................................... 5 Table 3.2: Herbarium mapped regional ecosystems ................................................................................. 6 Table 3.3: Threatened Flora Species that may occur within the Survey Area. ............................................ 7 Table 3.4: Potential a significant impact on listed fauna species. ............................................................. 11 Table 3.5: Field Validated Regional Ecosystems. ...................................................................................... 16 Appendices Appendix A: WildNet Database Search Appendix B: Protected Matters Database Search Appendix C EVNT Flora Species Habitat Modelling Appendix D EVNT Fauna Species Habitat Modelling Appendix E Regional Ecosystem Code Data Sheets Appendix F Quaternary Site Data Abbreviations EA Environmental Authority ESA Environmentally Sensitive Area RE Regional Ecosystems VM Act Queensland’s Vegetation Management Act 1999 Terrestria Pty Ltd Page ii File No: 0213 Cattle Creek Regional Ecosystem and Functionality Survey Cattle Creek Station, Southern Queensland Prepared for Santos Pty Ltd 1.0 Introduction 1.11.11.1 Background and Purpose Terrestria Pty Ltd has prepared this report for Santos Pty Ltd for the purpose of providing an independent ecological assessment of well pads, access and gathering lines on Cattle Creek Station Southern Queensland (Project area) (FigureFigure 1.11.1). The aims of this report are to provide spatially explicit, field-derived ecological data to assist in appropriate location of gas infrastructure. On-ground and desktop assessments have been conducting in accordance with requirements set out within under the Methodology for Assessing Ecological Values (0007-650-PRO-0007), including: • Likelihood of occurrence assessment for Flora and Fauna EVNT • Habitat Assessment for all EVNT Species • General EVNT flora survey o Note the site is not in a high risk zone so there is only a need to complete to the Qld standard if a EVNT plant is located • RE Mapping for the construction footprint plus a 100m buffer o Opportunistic RE mapping data was taken throughout the CDZ during condition and habitat assessments. Mapping outside of the CDZ focused on regrowth endangered REs where community functionality requires assessment. • BioCondition sites were placed in all assessment units intersected by the CDZ. o In accordance with the Qld habitat quality scoring guide – including survey effort of assessment units The results of this report are based on Project area investigations undertaken by Donovan Sharp and Heath Agnew on 22 – 26 June 2020. 1.21.21.2 Proposed Works The proposed works consists of a series well heads, a work areas and associated gathering flow lines and access tracks. The initial concept design is shown in Figure 11. On site survey in the presence of Santos’ construction team allows for a responsive approach, with detailed well pad position and layout and gathering flow line routes configured to respond to identified ecological values in the field. 1.31.31.3 General Project AAAreaArea Description Set on top of the expedition range plateau the Project area is an undulating set of hills and dominated by cleared grazing lands on soils derived medium to coarse-grained sedimentary rocks. The more fertile valley floors have been extensively cleared and are heavily grazed, with the exception of open-forests and woodlands retained around the central watercourse. The steeper valley sides and watercourses to the north and west retain large expanses of woodlands. Terrestria Pty Ltd Page 1 File No: 0213 Cattle Creek Regional Ecosystem and Functionality Survey Cattle Creek Station, Southern Queensland Prepared for Santos Pty Ltd 2.0 Methodology Field and desktop assessments were carried out in accordance with: • Methodology for Assessing Ecological Values (0007-650-PRO-0007) • Santo’s Procedure for Conducting Vegetation Assessments, Document Number: 0007-650-PRO- 0008, • Procedure for Conducting Preliminary Ecological Desktop Assessments (0007-650-PRO-0009) • Procedure for Conducting Wetland Assessments (3301-GLNG-4-1.3-0016) • Guideline for Conducting Vegetation Community Assessments: A Guide to Using the ‘Procedure for Vegetation Community Assessments’ (0007-650-GDE-0002). Results from the protected matters search tool have been used to build up a picture of the potential values present on or close to the Project area. The field assessment has identified the existence of these values on-ground and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ecology Assessment Report Pre-Clearance Survey Report
    2 Ecology Assessment Report Pre-clearance Survey Report Consultant/contractor and sub-contractor document review/approval 48DY69, 46DY69, 69DY97, 70DY97, 74DY99, 14DY67, 2RP840942, Warra-Kogan Road reserve, Lot no. Healey's Crossing Road reserve, Dalby-Kogan Road reserve Property name Various Disturbance Tracker no. DP139 Origin/Australia Pacific LNG document no. Q-4331-15-RP-001 Contractor internal reference no. (if 17BRI-7037 applicable) Submitted by (full name of author) Kate Brodie, Loren Appleby, Emma Blacklock Consultant/contractor N/A comments Pre-clearance Survey Report expiry N/A date Technical Revision Date Status Checked Q/A Review 1 12/12/2017 Issued for Use L Appleby L Appleby L Appleby 2 27/08/2018 Issued for Use Liz Fisher Liz Fisher Ailsa Kerswell pp. pp. pp. Template Ref: Q-LNG01-15-AQ-0225 Revision: 2 Approvals, Land and Stakeholder, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped controlled copy. Rev. 0 approved by (name and title) Signature Tim Collins Kainama Development (Stage 1) – Terrestrial Ecology Survey Report Prepared for Origin Energy th 27 August 2018 Kainama Stage 1 Terrestrial Ecology Assessment DOCUMENT TRACKING Item Detail Project Name Kainama Development Stage 1 Ecology Survey Project Number 17BRI-7037 Loren Appleby Project Manager 07 3239 9401 Level 5 / 12 Creek St Brisbane Qld 4000 Prepared by Kate Brodie, Loren Appleby, Emma Blacklock Reviewed by Liz Fisher, Alan House Approved by Ailsa Kerswell Status Final Version Number Revision 2 Last saved on 27th August 2018 Cover Photo Philotheca sporadica and Eucalyputs curtisii, Loren Appleby, 2017. This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves
    The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves Project funded under the Central Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division Biodiversity Data Priorities Program Conservation Assessment and Data Unit Conservation Programs and Planning Branch, Metropolitan Environmental Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CADU (Central) Manager Special thanks to: Julie Ravallion Nattai NP Area staff for providing general assistance as well as their knowledge of the CADU (Central) Bioregional Data Group area, especially: Raf Pedroza and Adrian Coordinator Johnstone. Daniel Connolly Citation CADU (Central) Flora Project Officer DEC (2004) The Native Vegetation of the Nattai Nathan Kearnes and Bargo Reserves. Unpublished Report. Department of Environment and Conservation, CADU (Central) GIS, Data Management and Hurstville. Database Coordinator This report was funded by the Central Peter Ewin Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division, Biodiversity Survey Priorities Program. Logistics and Survey Planning All photographs are held by DEC. To obtain a Nathan Kearnes copy please contact the Bioregional Data Group Coordinator, DEC Hurstville Field Surveyors David Thomas Cover Photos Teresa James Nathan Kearnes Feature Photo (Daniel Connolly) Daniel Connolly White-striped Freetail-bat (Michael Todd), Rock Peter Ewin Plate-Heath Mallee (DEC) Black Crevice-skink (David O’Connor) Aerial Photo Interpretation Tall Moist Blue Gum Forest (DEC) Ian Roberts (Nattai and Bargo, this report; Rainforest (DEC) Woronora, 2003; Western Sydney, 1999) Short-beaked Echidna (D. O’Connor) Bob Wilson (Warragamba, 2003) Grey Gum (Daniel Connolly) Pintech (Pty Ltd) Red-crowned Toadlet (Dave Hunter) Data Analysis ISBN 07313 6851 7 Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly Report Writing and Map Production Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes the distribution and composition of the native vegetation within and immediately surrounding Nattai National Park, Nattai State Conservation Area and Bargo State Conservation Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materialsupplementary Material
    10.1071/BT13149_AC © CSIRO 2013 Australian Journal of Botany 2013, 61(6), 436–445 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Comparative dating of Acacia: combining fossils and multiple phylogenies to infer ages of clades with poor fossil records Joseph T. MillerA,E, Daniel J. MurphyB, Simon Y. W. HoC, David J. CantrillB and David SeiglerD ACentre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600 Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. BRoyal Botanic Gardens Melbourne, Birdwood Avenue, South Yarra, Vic. 3141, Australia. CSchool of Biological Sciences, Edgeworth David Building, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. DDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. ECorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Table S1 Materials used in the study Taxon Dataset Genbank Acacia abbreviata Maslin 2 3 JF420287 JF420065 JF420395 KC421289 KC796176 JF420499 Acacia adoxa Pedley 2 3 JF420044 AF523076 AF195716 AF195684; AF195703 Acacia ampliceps Maslin 1 KC421930 EU439994 EU811845 Acacia anceps DC. 2 3 JF420244 JF420350 JF419919 JF420130 JF420456 Acacia aneura F.Muell. ex Benth 2 3 JF420259 JF420036 JF420366 JF419935 JF420146 KF048140 Acacia aneura F.Muell. ex Benth. 1 2 3 JF420293 JF420402 KC421323 JQ248740 JF420505 Acacia baeuerlenii Maiden & R.T.Baker 2 3 JF420229 JQ248866 JF420336 JF419909 JF420115 JF420448 Acacia beckleri Tindale 2 3 JF420260 JF420037 JF420367 JF419936 JF420147 JF420473 Acacia cochlearis (Labill.) H.L.Wendl. 2 3 KC283897 KC200719 JQ943314 AF523156 KC284140 KC957934 Acacia cognata Domin 2 3 JF420246 JF420022 JF420352 JF419921 JF420132 JF420458 Acacia cultriformis A.Cunn. ex G.Don 2 3 JF420278 JF420056 JF420387 KC421263 KC796172 JF420494 Acacia cupularis Domin 2 3 JF420247 JF420023 JF420353 JF419922 JF420133 JF420459 Acacia dealbata Link 2 3 JF420269 JF420378 KC421251 KC955787 JF420485 Acacia dealbata Link 2 3 KC283375 KC200761 JQ942686 KC421315 KC284195 Acacia deanei (R.T.Baker) M.B.Welch, Coombs 2 3 JF420294 JF420403 KC421329 KC955795 & McGlynn JF420506 Acacia dempsteri F.Muell.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Burrowii Maiden
    WATTLE Acacias of Australia Acacia burrowii Maiden Source: Australian Plant Image Index Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: Australian Plant Image Index (dig.23654). Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com (dig.23655). ANBG © M. Fagg, 2012 J. & M. Simmons J. & M. Simmons ANBG © M. Fagg, 2012 Source: Australian Plant Image Index Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. (dig.23656). Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com ANBG © M. Fagg, 2012 Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com J. & M. Simmons Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Acacia burrow ii occurrence map. O ccurrence map generated via Atlas of Living Australia (https://w w w .ala.org.au). Common Name Burrow’s Wattle Family Fabaceae Distribution Occurs on the North Western Plains of N.S.W. from Cobar-Nyngan area N to Yetman (including the Pilliga Scrub), and in south-eastern Qld from the Goodiwindi– Moonie area N to Eidsvold, W of 151ºE. Description Tree to 13 m high, single-stemmed. Bark ribbony, grey. Branchlets angular towards apices, red-brown, scurfy, glabrous, ±resinous. Phyllodes narrowly to very narrowly elliptic, flat, straight or slightly curved, (2–) 3–11 cm long, (2–) 4–10 mm wide (juveniles to 14 mm wide and scurfy), coriaceous, with 1–3 slightly prominent main nerves; minor nerves 8–10 per mm, parallel, not anastomosing; gland 1, basal, to 1 mm above pulvinus.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B Biodiversity Assessment Boggabri Coal Expansion Project Ecological Assessment for Boggabri Coal Project Modification Modification 4
    Appendix B Biodiversity assessment Boggabri Coal Expansion Project Ecological Assessment for Boggabri Coal Project Modification Modification 4 16 December 2014 Document information Client: Boggabri Coal Expansion Project Title: Ecological Assessment for Boggabri Coal Project Modification Subtitle: Modification 4 Document No: 2119017A-ENV-REP-001 RevE Date: 16 December 2014 Rev Date Details A 03/11/2014 Draft B 07/11/2014 Draft C 03/12/2014 Final D 12/12/2014 Final E 16/12/2014 Final Author, Reviewer and Approver details Prepared by: Tanya Bangel Date: 03/12/2014 Signature: Reviewed by: Alex Cockerill Date: 03/12/2014 Signature: Approved by: Alex Cockerill Date: 03/12/2014 Signature: Distribution Boggabri Coal Expansion Project , Parsons Brinckerhoff file, Parsons Brinckerhoff Library ©Parsons Brinckerhoff Australia Pty Limited 2014 Copyright in the drawings, information and data recorded in this document (the information) is the property of Parsons Brinckerhoff. This document and the information are solely for the use of the authorised recipient and this document may not be used, copied or reproduced in whole or part for any purpose other than that for which it was supplied by Parsons Brinckerhoff. Parsons Brinckerhoff makes no representation, undertakes no duty and accepts no responsibility to any third party who may use or rely upon this document or the information. Document owner Parsons Brinckerhoff Australia Pty Limited ABN 80 078 004 798 Level 3 51-55 Bolton Street Newcastle NSW 2300 PO Box 1162 Newcastle NSW 2300 Australia Tel: +61 2 4929 8300 Fax: +61 2 4929 8382 www.pbworld.com Certified to ISO 9001, ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001 Boggabri Coal Expansion Project Ecological Assessment for Boggabri Coal Project Modification - Modification 4 Contents Page number Glossary iv 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingdom Class Family Scientific Name Common Name I Q a Records
    Kingdom Class Family Scientific Name Common Name I Q A Records plants monocots Poaceae Paspalidium rarum C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Aristida latifolia feathertop wiregrass C 3/3 plants monocots Poaceae Aristida lazaridis C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Astrebla pectinata barley mitchell grass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Cenchrus setigerus Y 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Echinochloa colona awnless barnyard grass Y 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Aristida polyclados C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Cymbopogon ambiguus lemon grass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Digitaria ctenantha C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Enteropogon ramosus C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Enneapogon avenaceus C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Eragrostis tenellula delicate lovegrass C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Urochloa praetervisa C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Heteropogon contortus black speargrass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Iseilema membranaceum small flinders grass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Bothriochloa ewartiana desert bluegrass C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Brachyachne convergens common native couch C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Enneapogon lindleyanus C 3/3 plants monocots Poaceae Enneapogon polyphyllus leafy nineawn C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Sporobolus actinocladus katoora grass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Cenchrus pennisetiformis Y 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Sporobolus australasicus C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Eriachne pulchella subsp. dominii C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Dichanthium sericeum subsp. humilius C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Digitaria divaricatissima var. divaricatissima C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Eriachne mucronata forma (Alpha C.E.Hubbard 7882) C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Sehima nervosum C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Eulalia aurea silky browntop C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Chloris virgata feathertop rhodes grass Y 1/1 CODES I - Y indicates that the taxon is introduced to Queensland and has naturalised.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Unit Master
    Land Unit Information Sheet Land system name: Ludgate Land unit: LE3 General description This land unit represents the numerous shallow closed depressions, which occur throughout the Ludgate land system and range in size from hundreds of hectares to very small, so small that they cannot be delineated at a map scale of 1:100 000. Grey Vertosols (uniform, cracking clay soils) are predominant, however the area and depth of clay seem to have a major influence on the density and composition of the native vegetation. Acacia cambagei (gidgee), A. farnesiana (mimosa bush), Eucalyptus coolabah (coolabah), Eremophila bignoniiflora (eurah) together with Astrebla species (Mitchell grass) and Brachyachne convergens (native couch) are common on the deep, self-mulching clay soils, whereas the smaller areas with shallow clays, and slightly saline areas tend to have only coolabah, mimosa bush and a ground cover of annual plant species. Invariably, Eucalyptus brownii (Reid River box) and E. whitei (White's ironbark) fringe the depressions. Regional ecosystem 10.3.15 is predominant. Site characteristics Landform element Average slope Plain 0% Site drainage Soil permeability Poorly drained Slowly permeable Flooding risk Inundation risk Low Very high Potential recharge to groundwater Soil depth Low Variable; >1,5m Present land use Grazing, wetlands Susceptibility to land degradation processes Sheet erosion Gully erosion Wind erosion Salting Very low Very low Low High This information has been generated from the Desert Uplands Land Resource Database. The Environmental Protection Agency accepts no liability for any decisions or actions taken on the basis of this information. State of Queensland. Environmental Protection Agency 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vegetation of the Western Blue Mountains Including the Capertee, Coxs, Jenolan & Gurnang Areas
    Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) The Vegetation of the Western Blue Mountains including the Capertee, Coxs, Jenolan & Gurnang Areas Volume 1: Technical Report Hawkesbury-Nepean CMA CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY The Vegetation of the Western Blue Mountains (including the Capertee, Cox’s, Jenolan and Gurnang Areas) Volume 1: Technical Report (Final V1.1) Project funded by the Hawkesbury – Nepean Catchment Management Authority Information and Assessment Section Metropolitan Branch Environmental Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation July 2006 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project has been completed by the Special thanks to: Information and Assessment Section, Metropolitan Branch. The numerous land owners including State Forests of NSW who allowed access to their Section Head, Information and Assessment properties. Julie Ravallion The Department of Natural Resources, Forests NSW and Hawkesbury – Nepean CMA for Coordinator, Bioregional Data Group comments on early drafts. Daniel Connolly This report should be referenced as follows: Vegetation Project Officer DEC (2006) The Vegetation of the Western Blue Mountains. Unpublished report funded by Greg Steenbeeke the Hawkesbury – Nepean Catchment Management Authority. Department of GIS, Data Management and Database Environment and Conservation, Hurstville. Coordination Peter Ewin Photos Kylie Madden Vegetation community profile photographs by Greg Steenbeeke Greg Steenbeeke unless otherwise noted. Feature cover photo by Greg Steenbeeke. All Logistics
    [Show full text]
  • Brisbane Native Plants by Suburb
    INDEX - BRISBANE SUBURBS SPECIES LIST Acacia Ridge. ...........15 Chelmer ...................14 Hamilton. .................10 Mayne. .................25 Pullenvale............... 22 Toowong ....................46 Albion .......................25 Chermside West .11 Hawthorne................. 7 McDowall. ..............6 Torwood .....................47 Alderley ....................45 Clayfield ..................14 Heathwood.... 34. Meeandah.............. 2 Queensport ............32 Trinder Park ...............32 Algester.................... 15 Coopers Plains........32 Hemmant. .................32 Merthyr .................7 Annerley ...................32 Coorparoo ................3 Hendra. .................10 Middle Park .........19 Rainworth. ..............47 Underwood. ................41 Anstead ....................17 Corinda. ..................14 Herston ....................5 Milton ...................46 Ransome. ................32 Upper Brookfield .......23 Archerfield ...............32 Highgate Hill. ........43 Mitchelton ...........45 Red Hill.................... 43 Upper Mt gravatt. .......15 Ascot. .......................36 Darra .......................33 Hill End ..................45 Moggill. .................20 Richlands ................34 Ashgrove. ................26 Deagon ....................2 Holland Park........... 3 Moorooka. ............32 River Hills................ 19 Virginia ........................31 Aspley ......................31 Doboy ......................2 Morningside. .........3 Robertson ................42 Auchenflower
    [Show full text]
  • Palatability of Plants to Camels (DBIRD NT)
    Technote No. 116 June 2003 Agdex No: 468/62 ISSN No: 0158-2755 The Palatability of Central Australian Plant Species to Camels Dr B. Dorges, Dr J. Heucke, Central Australian Camel Industry Association and R. Dance, Pastoral Division, Alice Springs BACKGROUND About 600,000 camels (Camelus dromedarius) are believed to inhabit the arid centre of Australia, mainly in South Australia, Western Australia and the Northern Territory. Most of these camels are feral. A small camel industry has developed, which harvests selected animals for domestic and export markets, primarily for meat. Camels can eat more than 80% of the common plant species found in Central Australia. Some plant species are actively sought by camels and may need to be protected. METHOD Observations of grazing preferences by camels were made periodically for up to 12 years on five cattle stations in Central Australia. Where camels were accustomed to the presence of humans, it was possible to observe their grazing preferences from a few metres. Radio transmitters were fitted on some camels for easy detection and observation at any time. These evaluations were used to establish a diet preference or palatability index for observed food plants. Table 1. Palatability index for camels Index Interpretation 1 only eaten when nothing else is available 2 rarely eaten 3 common food plant 4 main food plant at times 5 preferred food plant 6 highly preferred food plant 7 could be killed by camel browsing More information can be obtained from the web site of the Central Australian Camel Industry Association http://www.camelsaust.com.au 2 RESULTS Table 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No.133
    Acacia brunioides !" " As I write this, Melbourne is enjoying its coldest June day Contents Page since 1998. But to brighten up the bleakest of days, we have near our front door a brightly flowering Acacia chrysocephala. I first saw this small wattle some years ago, From the Leader 1 !"#$#%&'(#)&*#$"+#,'&(#-."&#+$(/#$*#0!"(#1$%$"$,234# Welcome 2 garden at Ocean Grove (south of Melbourne). Tony had a Study Group Excursions 2 number of these wattles dotted around the edge of his lawn, 5'6,2*&"6",#.7#$"#!*2&')64&#+.88#)6"*&'34#9!'"6",:##;*4# Smelly Acacias and Climate 2 bright golden flowers and compact growth habit make it a Acacia hybrids 2 great garden plant. Acacia irrorate 4 New Species ! Acacia citriodora 4 I hope that you find a number of the articles in this Transplanting Acacias and Other newsletter interesting, but one that I think is of particular Seedlings 4 interest is the one by John Gibson on the nature of the smell Prickly! You Bet! 5 of Acacia roots, and a possible link to our climate. I believe Books 6 that a number of our Study Group members have been Acacia cretacea 7 conscious of the smell emitted by Acacia roots < if you are Acacias in The News 8 one of these members, could you provide any information Wattle Day 2016 8 or data that you have to John, as he has requested in the Seed Bank 8 article (see page 2). Study Group Membership 9 As for all Study Groups, membership fees fall due on 1 July each year ! so it is now that time of year.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Land Clearing
    Impacts of Land Clearing on Australian Wildlife in Queensland January 2003 WWF Australia Report Authors: Dr Hal Cogger, Professor Hugh Ford, Dr Christopher Johnson, James Holman & Don Butler. Impacts of Land Clearing on Australian Wildlife in Queensland ABOUT THE AUTHORS Dr Hal Cogger Australasian region” by the Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union. He is a WWF Australia Trustee Dr Hal Cogger is a leading Australian herpetologist and former member of WWF’s Scientific Advisory and author of the definitive Reptiles and Amphibians Panel. of Australia. He is a former Deputy Director of the Australian Museum. He has participated on a range of policy and scientific committees, including the Dr Christopher Johnson Commonwealth Biological Diversity Advisory Committee, Chair of the Australian Biological Dr Chris Johnson is an authority on the ecology and Resources Study, and Chair of the Australasian conservation of Australian marsupials. He has done Reptile & Amphibian Specialist Group (IUCN’s extensive research on herbivorous marsupials of Species Survival Commission). He also held a forests and woodlands, including landmark studies of Conjoint Professorship in the Faculty of Science & the behavioural ecology of kangaroos and wombats, Mathematics at the University of Newcastle (1997- the ecology of rat-kangaroos, and the sociobiology of 2001). He is a member of the International possums. He has also worked on large-scale patterns Commission on Zoological Nomenclature and is a in the distribution and abundance of marsupial past Secretary of the Division of Zoology of the species and the biology of extinction. He is a member International Union of Biological Sciences. He is of the Marsupial and Monotreme Specialist Group of currently the John Evans Memorial Fellow at the the IUCN Species Survival Commission, and has Australian Museum.
    [Show full text]