823

PARLIAMENT OF NEW SOUTH WALES LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY

1997-98

THIRD SESSION OF THE FIFTY-FIRST PARLIAMENT

______

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

No. 38

WEDNESDAY 3 JUNE 1998

______

[The Questions and Answers Paper is published for each sitting day and will contain, by number and title, all unanswered questions, together with questions to which answers have been received on the previous sitting and any new questions. Consequently the full text of any question will be printed only twice: when notice is given; and, when answered.] 824 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

PUBLICATION OF QUESTION ANSWER TO BE LODGED BY

Q. & A. No. 26 2 June 1998 (Including Question Nos 453 to 486)

Q. & A. No. 27 3 June 1998 (Including Question Nos 487 to 512)

Q. & A. No. 28 4 June 1998 (Including Question Nos 513 to 536)

Q. & A. No. 29 9 June 1998 (Including Question Nos 537 to 545)

Q. & A. No. 30 10 June 1998 (Including Question Nos 546 to 568)

Q. & A. No. 31 11 June 1998 (Including Question Nos 569 to 583)

Q. & A. No. 32 23 June 1998 (Including Question Nos 584 to 607)

Q. & A. No. 33 24 June 1998 (Including Question Nos 608 to 629)

Q. & A. No. 34 25 June 1998 (Including Question Nos 630 to 642)

Q. & A. No. 35 30 June 1998 (Including Question Nos 643 to 658)

Q. & A. No. 36 1 July 1998 (Including Question Nos 659 to 676)

Q. & A. No. 37 2 July 1998 (Including Question Nos 677 to 691)

Q. & A. No. 38 7 July 1998 (Including Question Nos 692 to 704) 825 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

Notice of Question given on the date shown

28 APRIL 1998

(Paper No. 26)

*453 POLICE STATIONS AT UNGARIE AND WEST WYALONG—Mr Armstrong asked the Minister for Police—

(1) What is the current authorised strength for the police station at Ungarie? (2) What is the current authorised strength for the police station at West Wyalong? (3) Of the above authorised positions, how many are unfilled and for what reason? (4) Since the beginning of 1998, what is the average number of hours each week that the Ungarie Police Station has been manned? (5) During the time when the station has been unmanned, what are the arrangements for attending emergencies in Ungarie and how many times have these arrangements been necessary?

Answer—

(1) and (2) It is impossible to accurately answer these questions in their current form as the honourable member has nominated police stations rather than Local Area Commands. (3) Not applicable, see (1) and (2). (4) and (5) The staffing arrangements of individual stations within Local Area Commands are a matter for the Local Area Commander and are determined according to need. Officers from the relevant Local Area Command police the entire area responding to and preventing crime. Other than this, to provide a detailed response to these questions would take considerable time and resources which are not warranted in view of the other priorities of the NSW Police Service. To provide answers to these questions would require police officers to check numerous records which would be extremely time consuming. This would be an unacceptable impost on New South Wales taxpayers.

*454 ANTICIPATED LITIGATIONS—SOCOG—Mr Armstrong asked the Minister for the Olympics—

(1) Does the Government have any current estimates for anticipated litigations against either SOCOG or any Government agency for disputes that may arise due to Sydney hosting the Olympic Games in 2000? (2) If so, what are those estimates? (3) If not, why not? (4) What mechanisms has the Government introduced that mandate the use of correct procedures in managing and resolving potential disputes that could arise from the Sydney Olympic Games? (5) How does the Government intend to deal with litigations arising from potential disputes such as, but not limited to, native title, ticketing, non-licensed goods, street vending, personal injury claims and substandard accommodation? (6) Given that SOCOG is to be wound down on or before 31 March 2002, what arrangements have been made to deal with ongoing disputes after this date?

Answer—

(1) No. (2) Not applicable.

(3) to (6) The actual level of litigation that may involve SOCOG is impossible to accurately forecast. The Olympic Games generate a significant amount of commercial activity. Some of this activity is in 826 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

areas in which the law is very complex. The level of litigation, if any, will be dependent on a variety of factors. Neither SOCOG or the Government is in a position to control many of these factors and hence is not in a position to estimate the volume of litigations that may arise from the Olympic Games. However, both the OCA and SOCOG agree that it is possible to minimise the level and cost of disputation by implementing a dispute resolution system that prevents or manages disputation. Both have implemented such systems with arbitration or litigation as a last resort. In addition, in Sydney there are co-operative relationships of the stakeholders in the preparations for the Olympic and Paralympic Games. Such relationships are the results of our existing dispute resolution mechanisms and labour laws which are quite different from those which exist in Los Angeles or Atlanta. Further, contrary to the statements made in the Altobelli Report, the actual cost and volume of litigation that arose as a result of the Atlanta Olympic Games was minimal. SOCOG has no reason to expect that the cost and volume of litigation arising from the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games will be anything other than minimal.

*456 “NSW STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT, 1997”—Mr Cruickshank asked the Minister for the Environment—

(1) In relation to the 500-page book prepared by the EPA titled “NSW State of the Environment, 1997”, how many copies of this book have been printed? (2) At what cost per book has this been done?

Answer—

(1) The Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has advised me that 2,200 copies of the 1997 State of the Environment Report have been printed. I am informed that the initial 1,200 copies were all distributed, requiring a further print-run of 1,000 copies to meet continued demand. I understand that the document is also available on the EPA’s internet website. The EPA is currently implementing a strategy for electronic publishing in order to give wider access to its publications and to reduce the amount of paper used in distributing information. (2) I am advised that the print cost per unit of the 1997 State of the Environment Report is $74.26 each.

*457 COST REDUCTION—WORKCOVER—Ms Ficarra asked the Minister for Information Technology, Minister for Forestry, Minister for Ports and Minister Assisting the Premier on Western Sydney representing the Attorney General and Minister for Industrial Relations—

What NSW Government initiatives have been introduced, or are proposed, to reduce costs to the NSW WorkCover scheme and so save jobs?

Answer—

In 1995, the Government inherited a WorkCover scheme in a state of serious financial difficulty following its neglect at the hands of the Liberal-National Coalition Government. Trends in the scheme’s claims experience, which became apparent in the early 1990s, were exacerbated by the actions of the previous Government in increasing the level of lump sum benefits for permanent impairment while maintaining premium rates at a level significantly lower than that required to fully fund the estimated future liabilities of the scheme. As a result, on coming into office in 1995, the Government was advised that claims costs were spiralling out of control and that the scheme, which had a reported surplus of over $1 billion only 2 years previously, was in serious financial trouble. 827 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

Since its election, the Carr Government has taken a series of significant and responsible legislative and administrative actions to turn around the financial performance of the scheme. Initially, the Government took the fiscally responsible decision to raise premium rates to an average of 2.5 per cent of wages. In addition, a legislative reform package was implemented to restrict access to key scheme cost drivers, including hearing loss and stress claims, and to suspend annual indexation of benefits levels for permanent disability. At the same time, penalties under workplace safety legislation were doubled to create a realistic deterrent to unsafe work practices. While these carefully targeted measures achieved considerable savings, the deteriorating claims experience trends that were ignored by the previous Government continued to worsen. As a result, the deficit continued to increase and the Government had to take further remedial action, including an increase in premiums to 2.8 per cent from July 1996. In addition, the Government recognised the need for all stakeholders in the scheme to come together to identify workable long-term solutions that would restore the scheme to a fully funded position and reduce premiums to a competitive level. To this end, a Tripartite Working Party with representatives of employers, employees, the insurance industry and legal and medical service provider groups was convened as a forum to identify further cost saving measures. A further reform package was introduced to Parliament in 1996 which included a reduction in lump sums for permanent disability, in effect to the levels prevailing in other states; limiting claims to where work was a “substantial contributing factor” to the injury; and a review of entitlement to continued weekly compensation after 2 years. In addition, on the basis of a report by Sir Laurence Street, an independent pilot conciliation service was established in April 1997 to reduce unnecessary litigation and consequent legal costs. A recent independent review of the progress of this new service has found it to be working well. However, the Government recognised that further reforms were required to provide the basis for the long-term viability of the workers compensation scheme and which over time would allow a reduction of premium rates while ensuring fair and adequate benefits. Therefore, in April 1997 at the request of major employer groups and with the support of the unions, the Minister for Industrial Relations, the Hon. Jeff Shaw, Q.C., M.L.C., commissioned an independent inquiry into the workers compensation system by Mr Richard Grellman of consulting firm KPMG. The role of the inquiry was to identify cost pressures on the scheme, focussing on the key problem of improving the rehabilitation and early return to work of injured workers, with a view to reducing premiums. After an exhaustive consultative process including two rounds of public submissions and extensive discussions with all major stakeholder groups, Mr Grellman delivered the final report of the inquiry on 18 September 1997. The Grellman Report contains a succinct and balanced analysis of the evolution of the WorkCover scheme and confirms that warnings of adverse trends in scheme costs in official actuarial reports from as early as 1992 were not acted upon and that premiums were kept at levels lower than the projected cost of the scheme. The Grellman Report included recommendations for fundamental reform to address the underlying structural weaknesses of the scheme. The most significant of these is the establishment of an Advisory Council of representatives of employers and workers as the peak decision-making body for workers compensation in New South Wales. Accordingly, the Government established an interim Advisory Council to review the remainder of the Grellman Report’s recommendations and make recommendations for the reform of the workers compensation system. The council has been meeting regularly since its establishment in November 1997 and has reached agreement on a process for reform of the workers compensation system. The key elements of the process are: • Formal establishment of the Advisory Council and Industry Reference Groups as recommended in the Grellman Report. 828 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

• New processes to ensure early and effective treatment and management of injured workers with a focus on safe and early return to work. • Maintenance of existing weekly and lump sum benefit levels with modifications to provide workers and employers with incentives for improved injury management and early return to work. • Continuation of the Workers Compensation Resolution Service at the Department of Industrial Relations with some enhancements to the processes for prevention and resolution of disputes on medical treatment and assessment issues. • Orderly transfer of the insurance underwriting risk to licensed WorkCover insurers as recommended by the Grellman Report. This transfer to apply to all insurance policies written after 1 October 1999. • Incentives for licensed insurers to manage existing long-term claims effectively and efficiently with a view to reducing the unfunded liability of the WorkCover scheme. • Guaranteed maximum average premium rate of 2.8 per cent of wages from now until the end of the first 12 months of insurer underwriting with any shortfall to be made up from existing Scheme assets. • Development of an enhanced centralised database to ensure the Advisory Council and the WorkCover Authority are in a position to effectively monitor scheme performance and recommend appropriate policies and strategies in response to scheme trends. • Development of a new Act which will reflect the major emphasis of the new system on effective treatment, rehabilitation and return to work of injured workers. The interim Advisory Council has requested that the Government move to introduce the new legislation into the current session of Parliament with a view to implementing the new system as soon as practicable. The interim council will continue to meet regularly to refine the details of the proposed new system and will actively participate in the legislative drafting process so as to address any changes or additions to the proposals outlined above as they arise. The diligent work of the interim Advisory Council over the past 6 months has demonstrated the value of a co-operative approach between employers and workers in the charting of a viable future for this State’s workers compensation system. The Government is committed to the continued involvement of all the interested parties in decision making on workers compensation as a way of ensuring a fair and equitable system with reasonable benefits for injured workers at premium rates which are stable and competitive for business.

*458 DAMAGE CLAIMS—15 AND 32 LEEDER AVENUE, PENSHURST—Ms Ficarra asked the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) In relation to damage claims and other outstanding matters in relation to No. 15 and No. 32 Leeder Avenue, Penshurst, when will the following be carried out: (a) Repairs and rectification work to 15 Leeder Avenue? (b) Rewelding rails to reduce vibration and raising the sound barrier to reduce noise in relation to 32 Leeder Avenue? (2) Why have building materials delivered before December 1997 remained dumped with no work undertaken till present? 829 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

Answer—

The Rail Access Corporation has advised the following: (1) (a) The residents of No. 15 Leeder Avenue have submitted a claim to the Rail Access Corporation. Rail Access has inspected the property and the matter is under consideration over possible compensation. However, Rail Access has advised the residents that, pending the outcome, if they wish to proceed with the necessary work on their house they are free to do so. (b) The report on vibration at No. 32 Leeder Avenue did not recommend track rewelding. It did recommend rail grinding and Rail Access has arranged for this to take place. The sound barrier was raised during the first available track possession on 19 April 1998. (2) Full delivery of building materials did not occur until the end of January 1998. The work was then delayed when, in February 1998, Leeder Avenue residents requested additional modifications to the planned works. The works were carried out during the earliest track possession on 19 April 1998.

*459 EIS FOR DEVELOPMENTS—Ms Ficarra asked the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

(1) Are there any guidelines for councils regarding the desirability of Environmental Impact Statements on particular developments? (2) At what scale or significance does a development attract the need for an EIS?

Answer—

(1) For proposals which require development consent, Schedule 3 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 1994 proscribes projects which require EISs. Additionally, environmental planning instruments may list projects requiring an EIS. For proposals which do not require development consent (such as many types of Government infrastructure projects), decision makers must consider whether the proposal is likely to significantly affect the environment on a case-by-case basis. If significant impacts are anticipated, then an EIS must be prepared and examined prior to approving the proposal. In 1995, I issued a guideline “Is an EIS Required?” to provide assistance in deciding if significant impacts are likely for developments which do not require development consent. (2) The need for an EIS as proscribed or as assessed for developments which do not require consent, is dependant on a number of criteria including: • the size and nature of potential impacts; • the character and resilience of the receiving environment; • the confidence in predicting the impacts; • the presence of other statutory controls; and • the degree of public interest.

*460 SECURITY—PATRICK STEVEDORING COMPANY—Mr Harrison asked the Minister for Police—

(1) Is he aware that security agents used by the Patrick Stevedoring Company, while concealing their identities by wearing black balaclavas, have used savage dogs and allegedly used chemical sprays against Sydney port workers? (2) Is the company responsible for employing these security agents licensed by the NSW Government? (3) If so, is the company permitted to use savage dogs and/or chemical sprays under the terms of its licence? 830 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

(4) What is the name of the security company involved? (5) Who are the directors of that company? (6) What is the paid up capital of that company? (7) What insurance coverage does that Company have against the possibility of serious injury caused to anybody by the use of savage dogs or chemical sprays? (8) Are all persons being used as security officers appropriately licensed to carry out security work?

Answer—

I have been advised on the matters raised by the Member for Kiama by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner of the NSW Police Service. (1) I have seen media images of security guards using balaclavas to conceal their identity and deploying guard dogs. (2) and (4) Patrick Stevedoring employed Forensic Behavioural Investigative Services International (FBIS), a company licensed in Victoria, to provide for the employment of security personnel. It appears FBIS subcontracted a company named Divisional Security (Aust) Pty Ltd to provide dock security, which in turn subcontracted to numerous other security firms who provided the security agents. It is believed over 12 security firms were involved in providing security personnel. I am advised by the manager of the NSW Police Service’s Security Industry Registry that Divisional Security (Aust) Pty Ltd is licensed by the NSW Government, as required by the Security (Protection) Industry Act 1985. That Act does not require interstate employers such as FBIS to be licensed. However, the Security Industry Act 1997, to commence operation on 1 July 1998, requires employers such as FBIS, who subcontract their employing function, to be appropriately licensed. (3) It is a criminal offence for a security agent to use a chemical spray. Whilst security licences do not prohibit the use of security dogs, a person who maliciously causes a dog to inflict grievous bodily harm or actual bodily harm is guilty of an offence under section 35A of the Crimes Act 1990 which carries a maximum penalty of 7 years imprisonment. Section 6 of the Dog Act 1966 also provides that an owner of a dog that attacks or causes injury to a person may be guilty of an offence. (5) and (6) These matters may be determined by a search of the Australian Security Commission’s records. (7) Currently, the insurance arrangements of security companies are a matter between those companies and their insurers. However, clause 24 of the Security Industry Regulation 1998, which will commence on 1 July 1998, requires security licensees who carry on security activities involving the possession or use of firearms or dogs to obtain public liability insurance of at least $10,000,000. (8) The NSW Police Service has been assured by FBIS that all relevant personnel were licensed security officers under the Security (Protection) Industry Act 1985. I have also been advised by the Assistant Deputy Commissioner that Patrick’s was approached to provide further details. However, they were unprepared to provide any additional information stating that such details, in the absence of a demonstrated necessity, was solely their business.

*461 SYDNEY WATER CORPORATION—REDUNDANCY—Mr Hartcher asked the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

(1) How many employees of the Sydney Water Corporation received redundancy packages and were then re-employed by the Sydney Water Corporation in the financial year 1996/97? (2) What was the total cost of these redundancy packages in the financial year 1996/97?

Answer—

(1) Two. Both cases are in accordance with Sydney Water’s policies on post separation employment and are consistent with common industrial practice. Employees who accept voluntary 831 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

redundancy, and who are subsequently re-employed by Sydney Water within the period covered by their redundancy payment, will agree to refund or repay the balance of their redundancy payment to Sydney Water. The first person was returned for a period of 1 month in a casual capacity to relieve for a member of staff on leave in a different position where her unique skills and knowledge were beneficial. The second person exited as a permanent employee and was re-employed 6 months later in a part-time casual capacity in a different position. The Auditor-General’s Office made inquiries during late 1997 with respect to this matter and was satisfied with the arrangement. (2) $48,027.

*462 DEMOUNTABLE CLASSROOMS—Mr Oakeshott asked the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

(1) What is the maximum temperature for children to be subjected to in demountables whilst learning? (2) What is the State Government doing to rectify high temperatures in demountables, particularly over summer?

Answer—

(1) The Department of Education and Training guidelines on the management of critical incidents in schools, including extremes of temperature, provide advice to school principals on difficulties caused by heat waves and precautions to be taken. School principals manage extremes of temperature by taking students to the coolest locations available in the school and ensuring that schools operate as effectively as possible. For demountable classrooms, there is no specified maximum temperature but schools continue to use their common sense and remove children to cooler spaces if necessary. (2) Care is taken with the design and orientation of demountables to minimise solar heat gain. They are insulated, have fixed awnings, blinds and sunshades along the side which is intended to be facing north/south whenever possible. When I was appointed Minister for Education and Training, the air cooling policy only covered schools west of the 33EC mean maximum January isotherm. This isotherm only included towns as far east as Gunnedah, Dubbo and Forbes. Since then, I have revised the policy to cover a much greater area of the State and target the hottest spots in the hottest schools. The new air-conditioning program ensures that schools located within the greatest heat stress locations across the State will benefit from some air-conditioning relief within the next 2 to 3 years. Funding for the program has been increased from $2 million to $5 million per annum for the next 3 years commencing in the 1997/98 financial year. Schools whose hottest classrooms are to be treated are located above the 30EC mean maximum January isotherm. All demountable classrooms will be treated down to the 29EC isotherm. However, to ensure all schools are treated to this temperature, schools will be treated down to 28.5EC isotherm. A trial of air-conditioning in demountable classrooms in the Badgerys Creek electorate is proceeding. Results so far indicate that the split system currently being trialled has resulted in greatly improved comfort conditions with a 10EC difference between inside and surrounding temperatures and achieves a realistic compromise between performance and cost.

*463 PROFESSIONAL RELATIONS FORUM—Mr O’Doherty asked the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

(1) Who chairs the Professional Relations Forum? (2) Which groups or individuals attend the meetings of the Forum? (3) On which dates did the Forum meet in 1997 and 1998? 832 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

(4) What were the outcomes of these meetings? (5) Has the Forum introduced any reports to the Department, Minister or any other party?

Answer—

(1) to (5) The Professional Relations Forum (PRF) was established under the Crown Employees (Teachers and Related Employees) Salaries and Conditions Award. The PRF consists of senior officers of the Department of Education and Training and the NSW Teachers Federation. It is chaired by Ann Morrow. It has met on a number of occasions and has discussed a range of issues including the status of teachers. It is not the role of the PRF to produce reports.

*464 SCHOOL VIOLENCE—Mr O’Doherty asked the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

From January 1995 to present— (1) How many violent critical incidents have been reported by school principals to the Department? (2) Of these, how many were assaults, threats of assault, possession or use of a weapon? (3) How many involved intruders to the school? (4) How many incidents have been reported by principals to police during this period? (5) How many students have been suspended following a violent critical incident? (6) What is the shortest suspension given, the longest suspension and the average length of suspension? (7) How many students have been excluded following a violent critical incident? (8) How many students have been expelled following violent critical incidents?

Answer—

(1) to (8) Different methodologies and procedures have been used for the reporting and recording of serious incidents over the period nominated by the member. Enhancements and other changes have been made to recording procedures to accommodate policy changes associated with the issue of violence in schools. Refinements in the use of computer technology, changes in the nature of the notifications expected by principals and clearer guidelines as to the way in which incidents have been categorised mean that the basis for recording incidents over the time period precludes the provision of valid information in the format which the member has requested. While these changes mean a far more reliable monitoring process is now in place, the previous manner of recording the information did not enable the collection of data in the format requested by the member. The current relevant data is included in the annual report of the Department of School Education for 1997. In relation to suspensions, the shortest suspension given is less than 1 day. The longest suspension given is 20 days. In recent years, the average length of short suspensions has been 2.8 days and the average length of long suspensions has varied between 9.9 and 11.2 days. The Department of Education and Training holds no data linking critical incidents to suspensions, exclusions or expulsions.

*465 MOUNT DRUITT HIGH SCHOOL—Mr O’Doherty asked the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

(1) What has been the enrolment number for Mount Druitt High School for each of the last 10 years? 833 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

(2) How many students have sought to transfer to a different school?

Answer—

(1) Enrolments Mount Druitt High School 1989 to 1998: Year Enrolment 1989 860 1990 681 1991 768 1992 736 1993 784 1994 787 1995 724 1996 681 1997 653 1998 609

(2) Students transferring from Mount Druitt High School to a different school: Year Total 1989 85 1990 125 1991 105 1992 87 1993 92 1994 26 1995 90 1996 38 1997 36 1998 (January to May) 11 N.B. This table does not include students who transferred to another school and subsequently returned to Mount Druitt High School.

*467 FERRY FARES—Mr O’Farrell asked the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) What was the price of a return ferry fare from Cremorne to Circular Quay in April 1995? (2) What is the current price for the same return trip?

Answer—

State Transit has advised me of the following: (1) $5.20. (2) $6.00. 834 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

*468 STATE TRANSIT AUTHORITY—BUS SHELTERS—Mr MacCarthy asked the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) Does the State Transit Authority have a policy that the provision of bus seats at bus stops is exclusively the responsibility of local government across New South Wales? (2) When was that policy formulated and by whom? (3) How was that policy publicised? (4) (a) In particular, did he or anyone acting on his behalf advise the councils of Ashfield, Burwood, Canterbury, Concord, Drummoyne and Strathfield? (b) If so, when?

Answer—

State Transit has advised the following: (1) to (4) Bus seats and other roadside infrastructure, such as shelters, are provided by local councils. State Transit and private bus operators are only responsible for the provision of items such as bus signs and timetable displays. Any seats that in the past have been provided by State Transit or its predecessors are maintained by State Transit until they are no longer in a satisfactory condition. They are then removed and it is up to local councils to replace them if considered necessary. As a courtesy, State Transit generally gives local councils notice of its intention to remove roadside infrastructure past its economic life.

*469 BUS SHELTERS—STRATHFIELD—Mr MacCarthy asked the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) How many bus stops in the electorate of Strathfield have bus seats or bus shelters provided by the State Transit Authority? (2) When and where was the latest installation or replacement of a bus seat or bus shelter by the State Transit Authority in the electorate? (3) (a) Are any of the bus seats or bus shelters (referred to in (1) above) expected to be removed within the next 3 years? (b) If so, where are they located? (4) How many bus seats or bus shelters in the electorate of Strathfield have been removed by the State Transit Authority in the past year and where were they located? (5) Will the State Transit Authority replace the seats or shelters referred to in (3) and (4) above? (6) If not, why not?

Answer—

State Transit has advised the following: (1) to (6) Bus seats and other roadside infrastructure, such as shelters, are provided by local councils. State Transit and private bus operators are only responsible for the provision of items such as bus signs and timetable displays. Any seats that in the past have been provided by State Transit or its predecessors are maintained by State Transit until they are no longer in a satisfactory condition. They are then removed and it is up to local councils to replace them if considered necessary. 835 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

*470 NOISE BARRIERS—STRATHFIELD—Mr MacCarthy asked the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) How long is the gap in the noise reduction wall alongside the eastern extremity of Centenary Drive, Strathfield, near Strathfield Golf Club? (2) (a) Has the Government done any study on the noise impact on neighbouring residences arising from this gap? (b) If so, with what results? (3) Does the Government have any plans to install further barriers where this gap occurs? (4) If so, at what time and at what cost? (5) If not, why not?

Answer—

(1) to (5) The gap between the newly constructed noise attenuation wall fronting the South Strathfield High School and the existing noise wall near Ada Avenue is approximately 400 m. The Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) has undertaken a noise study as part of the Review of Environmental Factors (REF) process for the upgrading of the Hume Highway, Centenary Drive and Roberts Road intersection. Predicted noise levels at neighbouring residences are within the RTA’s Interim Traffic Noise Policy objectives. Noise monitoring inside the school after the installation of the noise wall indicates that there has been a reduction in traffic noise experienced at the school. Continuation of the noise barrier will only be considered if a follow-up noise study indicates the need to do so. The RTA also proposes to carry out extensive landscaping between the Centenary Drive southbound carriageway and the golf course. The work is scheduled to commence in July 1998.

*474 TENDERING PROCESS—POLICE SERVICE—Ms Seaton asked the Minister for Police—

What procedures are in place for tendering of police contracts such as: (a) clothing? (b) printing? (c) equipment? (d) motor vehicles?

Answer—

I am advised by the NSW Police Service’s Executive Director, Management Services, that any tendering for contracts with the NSW Police Service must be conducted in accordance with relevant legislation and the applicable tendering policies of the NSW Government and NSW Police Service.

*475 MANNING LEVELS—CITYRAIL—Ms Seaton asked the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) What effect will the proposed CityRail Job and Work Redesign have on manning levels at CityRail stations? (2) What assurances will be given about manning levels at Mittagong, Bowral, Moss Vale, Bundanoon and Goulburn Stations? (3) How many ticket vending machines will be installed at CityRail stations? 836 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

Answer—

I have been advised by CityRail of the following: (1) and (2) CityRail is presently reviewing its station staffing levels and platform duties across the rail network with a view to ensuring that a high level of customer service is provided in the most efficient manner. The review is yet to be completed and any proposed changes will be fully evaluated before adjustments are considered. The security and safety of customers is CityRail’s number one priority. In this regard, I am assured by CityRail that the welfare of all rail customers will not be compromised by any proposed changes. (3) The ticketing requirements at stations are kept under review. New or additional equipment is provided with any changed circumstances.

*476 1998 OC CLASSES—Ms Seaton asked the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

(1) How many primary school children from Bowral PS, Moss Vale PS, Mittagong PS, Bundanoon PS, Sutton Forest PS, Exeter PS, Kangaloon PS, Glenquarry PS, Avoca PS, Penrose PS, Wingello PS, Berrima PS, Burrawang and Robertson PS were invited to sit examinations in 1997 to enrol in an OC Class in 1998? (2) Of those invited, how many students sat the exam? (3) Of those who sat the exam, how many were offered places in an OC Class? (4) Of those offered places, how many enrolled in an OC Class? (5) Of those who enrolled, how many continue to be enrolled? (6) Has Bowral Primary School previously offered an OC Class? (7) If so, during what years? (8) Why does the school not presently offer an OC Class?

Answer—

(1) The invitation for Year 4 students to apply for placement in a Year 5 Opportunity “C” (OC) class was extended to all parents. A memorandum was sent to all Government primary and central schools to outline the application procedures. The memorandum contained a reproducible copy of a letter for distribution to parents advising them of their entitlement to apply. The letter for parents was provides in a number of community languages and was intended for distribution to all parents of Year 4 students by all schools which were in a reasonable distance from a school with OC places. It was also intended for distribution to all parents who may have been moving by the beginning of the 1998 school year to an area where there was a school with OC places. Application packages were distributed to all Government primary schools and district offices for distribution to parents as required. An advertisement was placed in a major newspaper to further advertise this entitlement. (2) Sixty-three students from the schools listed (27 from Bowral, 19 from Moss Vale and 17 from Mittagong Primary Schools) sat the test. (3) Twenty-one of those students who applied (12 from Bowral, 4 from Moss Vale and 5 from Mittagong Primary Schools) were offered OC places. (4) Five of those students (4 from Bowral and 1 from Mittagong Primary Schools) enrolled in the OC class. (5) The Principal of Tahmoor Public School, the relevant school with OC places in the area, Ms Sue Atkins, has advised that all five students are still enrolled in the OC class. (6) The Principal of Bowral Public School, Ms Patricia Smith, has advised that Bowral Public School has never offered an OC class. (7) Not applicable. 837 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

(8) The provision of OC classes in the senior primary school is one of several approaches that the Department of Education and Training has adopted to address the needs of gifted and talented students. In 1996, the number of primary schools with OC places was increased by 11 to 65. Other provisions for gifted and talented students include early entry to school and various forms of accelerated progression, such as grade skipping, curriculum compacting or acceleration in one or more learning areas. The Department also supports the education of gifted and talented students through its funding of district gifted and talented education networks, the Mentor Links program, the Talented Development project and a number of selected school programs and initiatives each year. Last year, funding in excess of $160,000 was distributed to 88 schools and districts to implement gifted and talented education programs and initiatives. Three submissions for funding from the Shellharbour district were successful. Schools in the district received grants totalling $9,267.

*477 ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY—CAMPBELLTOWN/LIVERPOOL HOSPITALS—Mrs Skinner asked the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs—

(1) What was the outcome of his investigation into delays experienced by a patient with a broken leg transferred from Campbelltown Hospital to Liverpool Hospital? (2) Why did this man have to wait 5 days in pain, without food and on morphine, for orthopaedic surgery? (3) How many emergency patients were admitted to Liverpool Hospital between the time the patient was admitted to Liverpool Hospital and the time he finally received his operation 5 days later? (4) How many emergency patients were admitted to Campbelltown Hospital on the day the patient was transferred from Campbelltown Hospital to Liverpool Hospital? (5) How many beds were opened and staffed at Liverpool Hospital during this time? (6) How many beds were opened and staffed at Campbelltown Hospital during this time? (7) On what date did the accident happen and on what date did the patient receive his operation? (8) How many orthopaedic surgery sessions were allowed during those 5 days at Liverpool Hospital? (9) How many orthopaedic surgery sessions were allowed during those 5 days at Campbelltown Hospital? (10) Why was the patient initially transferred from Campbelltown Hospital to Liverpool Hospital if Liverpool Hospital was unable to carry out the surgery for 5 days?

Answer—

(1) to (10) The honourable member does not provide sufficient information to answer the question.

*478 LEGAL SUPPORT—SOUTH WESTERN SYDNEY AREA HEALTH SERVICE—Mrs Skinner asked the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs—

(1) How many barristers are employed to defend the South Western Sydney Area Health Service in the coronial hearings into the deaths of Colleen Campbell and David Wafer? (2) What is the cost to the South Western Sydney Area Health Service of employing this number of barristers? (3) How many legal support staff are employed in relation to each case to defend the South Western Sydney Area Health Service? (4) What is the cost to the South Western Sydney Area Health Service of employing this legal support staff? (5) What was the total cost to the South Western Sydney Area Health Service of its legal action in each case? 838 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

(6) In regard to the David Wafer case, has the review of the time needed to install a CT scanner in Campbelltown Hospital, as recommended by the Coroner, been completed? (7) If so, what was the finding? (8) If not, when will the review be completed?

Answer—

(1) I am advised that one barrister represented the South Western Sydney Area Health Service at each of the coronial hearings. (2) $14,325. (3) One solicitor advised the Area Health Service for each matter. (4) $15,457.20. (5) The cost of legal representation was $17,329.20 and $12,453. (6) Yes. (7) The Macarthur Health Service has received a grant for capital works which will include the installation of a CT scanner. (8) Not applicable.

*480 EUROBODALLA SHIRE HOSPITAL POLICY—Mr Smith asked the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs—

(1) Has a decision been made to maintain a two-hospital policy in the Eurobodalla Shire Council area? (2) Are there now plans to downgrade Batemans Bay Hospital?

Answer—

(1) Yes. (2) No.

*481 INTERIM ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES FOR NSW WATERS—Mr Smith asked the Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—

(1) With respect to the Clyde River Catchment Map, included as part of the discussion paper entitled “Proposed Interim Environmental Objectives for NSW Waters”: (a) Why are the Rural Regions shown to be greater than they actually are? (b) Why are the Urban Regions, for example Surfside, Batemans Bay and Malua Bay, shown as predominately forested? (c) Why do the estimated costs in the discussion paper, less than $1 million, not include initial and ongoing costs to landowners? (d) Why is information on the condition of the Clyde River not included in the paper? (e) Why, at the public meeting held in Batemans Bay on 3 March 1998 to discuss this paper, did the presenters refuse to answer specific questions on the Clyde River? (f) Why, in the “Key to Water Quality Site Assessments”, did the discussion paper in two cases on the Clyde River represent shellfish as meeting selected criteria in 50-75 per cent of samples, when tests done regularly on the quality of oysters show the criteria is met in 100 per cent of samples? (2) Are urban areas and poorly maintained rural roads and forestry operations, such as those in the Lower Clyde River Catchment, presenting a far greater environmental threat than the comparatively small area of rural land? (3) Why did the presenter of the paper at the public meeting insist on describing problems in the Murray River when the situation on the Clyde River is so different? 839 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

(4) Has agricultural activity and settlement on the Lower Clyde and between Nelligen and Currawan declined?

Answer—

(1) to (4) This matter does not form part of my portfolio and should be referred to the Minister for the Environment, the Hon. Pamela Allan, M.P., for response.

*482 ROAD SAFETY—NEW ENGLAND HIGHWAY—Mr Souris asked the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

In relation to the section of the New England Highway at the railway overpass bridge, north of Aberdeen— (1) How many accidents have there been since 1980? (2) Have there been any serious injuries or deaths during this time? (3) How many have involved heavy vehicles, e.g., trucks, semi-trailers? (4) How many have involved cars? (5) Why aren’t there indicators in the form of flashing lights or illustrated signage warning of a dangerous corner ahead, e.g., similar to the sign at the bend at Blandford, just south of Murrurundi? (6) When will this bend be aligned to remove the inherent danger that now exists in the current road structure? (7) When will funding be allocated to this section of highway?

Answer—

(1) There have been 27 recorded accidents in the vicinity of the railway overpass between 1 January 1980 and 30 September 1997. (2) There have been two fatalities and seven serious injuries. (3) There have been seven accidents involving articulated heavy vehicles and two involving rigid trucks. (4) There have been 20 accidents involving cars. (5) Signposting, similar to that at Blandford, is to be installed at this location. (6) and (7) The New England Highway is a National Highway and, as such, the timing of and funding for upgrading works are matters for the Federal Government. The failure of the Federal Government to allocate sufficient funds to maintain the New England Highway and to rectify safety blackspots is of serious concern to the NSW Government. National Highway funding in New South Wales has been reduced from $320 million in 1995/96 to $232 million in this Budget—a 28 per cent cut in funding. Maintenance funding for the National Highway system has also been cut 28 per cent in real terms. The 1998/99 Federal Budget failed to allocate any construction funding for key National Highway projects on the New England Highway requested by the NSW Government, including the $7 million Rose Valley Creek deviation and the $15.3 million Devils Pinch project.

*484 EPA LICENCE—MACQUARIE GENERATION—Mr Souris asked the Minister for the Environment—

(1) Has the Environment Protection Authority (EPA) issued a licence to Macquarie Generation to burn alternative fuels at Liddell Power Station? (2) What are the terms and conditions of the licence and when does the licence expire? (3) What environmental impact statement or statement of environmental factors were considered that led to the granting of the above licence? (4) What assessment process was undertaken by the EPA in granting the above licence? 840 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

(5) What is the full list of substances and their source to be used in the alternative fuels program? (6) In what way has the EPA satisfied itself that there will be no loss of air quality as a result of the above licence? (7) What investigations and assessments are being undertaken in respect of environmental impacts during the term of the current licence? (8) Is the EPA currently considering either renewing the above licence for a further term or issuing a new licence to allow the continuation of the alternative fuels program? (9) What documentation has been submitted by Macquarie Generation in support of the application for a renewed licence? (10) What assessment has the EPA undertaken to determine whether a renewed licence should be granted? (11) Has an indicative renewed licence been exposed to Macquarie Generation and what are the proposed conditions and length of time of any renewed licence? (12) Do you guarantee that there will be no diminution of air quality in the Hunter Valley as a result of the operation of the existing EPA licence or the proposed renewed licence?

Answer—

(1) Under State legislation, I am legally prevented from interfering in the routine licensing decisions of the independent Environment Protection Authority (EPA). However I am advised by the EPA that the current pollution control licence for Liddell Power Station allows the burning of a restricted range of supplementary fuels. (2) A notice to amend the 1997/98 pollution control licence was issued to Macquarie Generation on 1 October 1997. This notice allows the following supplementary fuels to be burnt at the Liddell Power Station: • Coal tar. • Coal tar soil mixtures. • Oil supplied by Collex. • Demineralised recycled oil. Other supplementary fuels may only be burnt in the station provided they have been assessed in accordance with a written protocol approved in writing by the EPA. This protocol is currently in draft form and is not yet approved. The pollution control licence for the Liddell Power Station is due for renewal on 27 July 1998. (3) Tests were undertaken on burning the supplementary fuels in 1995 and 1997. These trials confirmed that the emissions from co-burning supplementary fuels are similar to those from coal and fuel oil and that the emissions comply with the Clean Air Regulation and the current pollution control licence. (4) The EPA assessed the environmental impacts of the proposal to burn these supplementary fuels as required under section 111 of Part 5 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act. I am advised that the trial burning of the materials indicated no change to Macquarie Generation’s emissions from the Liddell Power Station and no detectable impact on the environment. (5) The supplementary fuels are those detailed in the notice (see (2) above). These materials are sourced from mines in the Hunter Valley and redevelopment sites throughout the State, including AGL gas works at Mortlake, BBC Hardware in Wollongong, the Chullora railyards, Wolli Creek Arncliffe and a site at Erskineville. 841 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

(6) I am advised that the supplementary fuels currently permitted under Liddell Power Station’s pollution control licence have similar chemical compositions to the coal and fuel oil used in power stations; their emissions have complied with the Clean Air Regulations and the EPA’s licence limits at all times. (7) I am informed that the power station’s pollution control licence requires continuous monitoring of emissions. The company is required to report the results of its monitoring on a quarterly basis to the EPA for review and to advise the EPA of any exceedence of the allowable limits immediately. (8) to (10) The EPA has directed Macquarie Generation to develop a protocol for the assessment of the suitability of any proposed supplementary fuels. This draft protocol is expected to be submitted to the EPA for review by 1 June 1998. (11) I am advised that an indicative renewed licence has not been exposed to Macquarie Generation and that the drafting of any new conditions for a licence renewal will be dependent on consideration of the protocol. (12) Macquarie Generation will be required to ensure that emissions from the Liddell station comply with the Clean Air Regulation and the requirements of any pollution control licence issued by the EPA.

*486 INLAND FISHERY INSPECTORS—Mr Turner asked the Minister for Mineral Resources and Minister for Fisheries—

(1) What are the number of fishery inspectors operating in inland New South Wales? (2) Are there any vacancies for inland fishery inspectors? (3) If so, how many? (4) If so, when will those vacancies be filled? (5) What were the number of illegal fish sales reported for non-tidal waters in New South Wales for the years 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998 to date? (6) How many complaints concerning fisheries matters in New South Wales inland waters were received by the Department of Fisheries for the years 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998 to date? (7) How many of the complaints referred to in question (6) were investigated? (8) If less than the number reported, why were the complaints not investigated? (9) (a) Are inland fishing inspectors required to receive permission or confirmation from the Department of Fisheries before they are allowed to investigate complaints? (b) If so, who in the Department is responsible for instructing inspectors to proceed or not to proceed to investigate complaints? (10) Why is this procedure in place? (11) What is the time lapse between the Department of Fisheries receiving notice of a complaint and instructing an inspector to take action? (12) If there is a time lapse, why?

Answer—

(1) There are currently 19 Fisheries officers, with the number under review and likely to increase. It should be noted that following a change of Government in 1988, the Coalition reduced the number to 13. (2) No. (3) Not applicable. (4) Not applicable. (5) 1995 2 1996 nil 1997 4 1998 nil 842 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

(6) The nature of “complaints” of this question is not clear and it is taken as relating to reports by the public of alleged illegal activities. NSW Fisheries do not maintain a wide ranging database to collate all reports received by the various Fisheries offices throughout the large geographical area involved. However, inland complaints via the statewide “Fisherman’s Watch” telephone service established to report illegal activity were: 1995 55 1996 55 1997 46 1998 20 (7) All complaints are investigated as fully as circumstances allow. (8) Not applicable. (9) (a) and (b) No. Fisheries officers have discretion to decide when to investigate if they are on duty or when they resume duty. In some situations they may investigate in response to a supervisor’s discretion. (10) Not applicable. (11) and (12) All complaints are investigated as soon as practicable based on nature of information received.

29 APRIL 1998

(Paper No. 27)

487 HOSPITAL WAITING LISTS—Mr Ellis to ask the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs—

488 POLICE RESPONSE TIMES—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Police—

489 RAIL ACCESS CORRIDOR—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

491 PUBLIC SERVICE VACANCIES—Mr Humpherson to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads representing the Minister for Public Works and Services—

492 POLICE STRENGTH—Mr Jeffery to ask the Minister for Police—

493 OFFSHORE SANDMINING—CRONULLA—Mr Kerr to ask the Premier, Minister for the Arts and Minister for Ethnic Affairs—

494 LIFT FACILITIES—CARINGBAH RAILWAY STATION—Mr Kerr to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

495 DREDGING IN PORT HACKING—Mr Kerr to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads representing the Minister for Public Works and Services—

*496 APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING—Mr MacCarthy asked the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

(1) In each of the financial years 1994/95 to 1997/98 inclusive, how much funding for apprenticeship training was provided to NECA Group Training? (2) What are the projected figures for 1998/99 and 1999/2000? (3) How many apprenticeships do these figures represent? 843 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

(4) In each of the years 1994/95 to 1999/2000, what average amounts per apprenticeship do these figures represent? (5) What proportion of these figures represents money provided by the Commonwealth and passed on by the State? (6) What trends are evident in the average amounts provided by the NSW Government (i.e., excluding the amounts covered by (5) above)? (7) What are the main factors influencing these trends?

Answer—

(1) The NSW Department of Education and Training provided funding to NECA Group Training Company under the Commonwealth/State Joint Policy on Group Training as follows: 1994/95 $72,000 1995/96 $60,025 1996/97 $69,239 1997/98 $78,704 (2) Based on current levels of activity, the Department anticipates that funding for NECA Group Training Company may be reduced over the next 2 years as follows: 1998/99 $63,000 1999/2000 $54,500 The anticipated decrease reflects NECA’s projected level of activity particularly in targeted equity groups and other Government priorities. (3) NECA Group Training Company has employed the following number of apprentices during the period: 1994/95 Not Available 1995/96 118 1996/97 152 1997/98 192 1998/99 193 (projected) 1999/2000 200 (projected) (4) An increase in group training activity over recent years has resulted in the average amount of funding per apprentice being reduced to all group training companies in New South Wales. The low number of apprentices employed by NECA Group Training Company from targeted equity groups has further impacted on reduced funding levels as follows: 1994/95 Not Available 1995/96 $509 1996/97 $456 1997/98 $410 1998/99 $327 (projected) 1999/2000 $273 (projected) (5) Group training companies receive funds under the Commonwealth/State Joint Policy on Group Training which provides for an equal contribution of funds. In 1997/98, both the Commonwealth Government through the Australian National Training Authority and the NSW Government contributed $1,140,000 to base funding for the program. (6) Individual grants to group training companies vary each year depending upon the achievements of the group training company for that year. An increase in group training activity over recent years has resulted in the level of funding per apprentice being reduced. However, group training companies who have achieved significant growth in targeted activity have achieved increased funding levels. 844 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

(7) The budget for group training companies in New South Wales has been fixed for the past 3 years. The program has, however, achieved significant growth in the employment of apprentices and trainees through increased outcomes by group training companies, particularly in equity target groups. The introduction of the new national funding model in 1998/99 will further encourage the expansion of apprentices and trainees employed in group training arrangements. Any group training company prepared to actively pursue growth in the number of apprentices and trainees employed, and is successful in achieving equity and other Government targets, can expect to receive increased funding under the new national funding model.

497 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING—HOME UNITS—Mr MacCarthy to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

499 REDFERN LOCAL COURT—Ms Moore to ask the Minister for Police representing the Attorney General and Minister for Industrial Relations—

500 EDEN REGIONAL FOREST FORUM—Mr D. L. Page to ask the Minister for the Environment—

501 THERAPEUTIC GOODS ADMINISTRATION—Mr D. L. Page to ask the Minister for Community Services, Minister for Ageing, Minister for Disability Services and Minister for Women—

502 GUARDIANSHIP TRIBUNAL ADMINISTRATION—Mr D. L. Page to ask the Minister for Community Services, Minister for Ageing, Minister for Disability Services and Minister for Women—

503 POLICE SERVICE—WAGGA WAGGA—Mr Schipp to ask the Minister for Police—

504 GOVERNMENT PRINTING SERVICE—Ms Seaton to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads representing the Minister for Public Works and Services—

505 GOVERNMENT SPECTACLE PROGRAM—Mrs Skinner to ask the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs—

*506 AMBULANCE CHARGES—Mrs Skinner asked the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs—

(1) What is the rate charge for use of NSW Ambulance Service: (a) per kilometre for the first 16 kilometres? (b) per kilometre for each kilometre after? (2) When was the last time ambulance charges were increased? (3) What was the rate prior to that increase?

Answer—

(1) (a) $136 for the first 16 kilometres or part thereof. (b) $3.47. (2) 2 October 1992. (3) (a) $133 for the first 16 kilometres or part thereof. (b) $3.39.

507 AMBULANCE SERVICES—PRIORITY AREAS—Mrs Skinner to ask the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs— 845 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

*508 RAIL EMPLOYEES—NARRABRI—Mr Slack-Smith asked the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

What was the sum paid to the Nandewar Motel, Narrabri, for Freight Rail employees’ accommodation and food in 1997 and 1998?

Answer—

FreightCorp has advised the following: The accommodation arrangements that FreightCorp establishes with any of its suppliers, including the Nandewar Motel, Narrabri, is commercially confidential. However, from April 1997 to September 1997, FreightCorp averaged nine rooms per day, due to the record grain harvest. From October 1997 to March 1998, the average has dropped to six rooms per day. However, it should be noted that these arrangements only include the provision of a room. All other incidentals, including meals, are the responsibility of individual employees in line with their award conditions.

509 PRETTY BEACH MURRAMARANG NATIONAL PARK—Mr Smith to ask the Minister for the Environment—

510 KARUAH BYPASS—Mr Souris to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

30 APRIL 1998

(Paper No. 28)

513 ALCOHOL-FREE ZONE—Mr Armstrong to ask the Minister for Police—

516 FIRE TANKER—MERRIWA—Mr Cochran to ask the Minister for Energy, Minister for Tourism, Minister for Corrective Services, Minister for Emergency Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

517 BOSTERBRICK BUSH FIRE BRIGADE—Mr Cochran to ask the Minister for Energy, Minister for Tourism, Minister for Corrective Services, Minister for Emergency Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

519 PENSHURST PUBLIC SCHOOL REFURBISHMENT—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

520 GEORGES RIVER KEEPER PROJECT—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for the Environment—

521 ABORIGINAL FUNDING—Mr Hazzard to ask the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs—

522 SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT—CRONULLA—Mr Kerr to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

523 SEWAGE SYSTEM—BUNDEENA/MAIANBAR—Mr Kerr to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing— 846 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

524 TRAFFIC LIGHTS—CARINGBAH—Mr Kerr to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

525 COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES—ANZAC DAY—Mr MacCarthy to ask the Premier, Minister for the Arts and Minister for Ethnic Affairs—

526 CRIME STATISTICS—Mr MacCarthy to ask the Minister for Police—

527 STATION ANNOUNCEMENTS—CITYRAIL—Mr MacCarthy to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

528 AST POSITIONS—Mr O’Doherty to ask the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

529 TEACHERS DEFERRED SALARY SCHEME—Mr O’Doherty to ask the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

530 SCHOOL REVIEW—Mr O’Doherty to ask the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

531 TICKET SALES—CITYRAIL—Mr O’Farrell to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

532 MAINTENANCE—CITYRAIL—Mr O’Farrell to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

533 STAFF NUMBERS—FISHERIES FIELD SERVICES—Mr Turner to ask the Minister for Mineral Resources and Minister for Fisheries—

534 FISHERIES OFFICE OPERATIONS—Mr Turner to ask the Minister for Mineral Resources and Minister for Fisheries—

535 GLEN AYR COLLIERY—Mr Turner to ask the Minister for Mineral Resources and Minister for Fisheries—

536 FISH STOCK—TILBA LAKE—Mr Turner to ask the Minister for Mineral Resources and Minister for Fisheries—

5 MAY 1998

(Paper No. 29)

537 OPERATION OF THE PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT—Mr Armstrong to ask the Minister for Police representing the Attorney General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Minister for Fair Trading—

538 MULTI PURPOSE CENTRE—METFORD—Mr Blackmore to ask the Premier, Minister for the Arts and Minister for Ethnic Affairs—

539 SPEED RESTRICTION ZONES—Mr Schipp to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads— 847 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

540 SECURITY GUARDS—CITYRAIL—Ms Seaton to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

541 LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUE—Ms Seaton to ask the Minister for Local Government—

542 BUS-ONLY ROAD—LIVERPOOL AND PARRAMATTA—Mr Souris to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

*543 MACQUARIE GENERATION—BLACK SMOKE CLOUDS—Mr Souris asked the Minister for Energy, Minister for Tourism, Minister for Corrective Services, Minister for Emergency Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

(1) What was the cause of the alleged thick black smoke clouds emitted from Liddell Power Station during the day on 28 April 1998? (2) What was the cause of the alleged thick black smoke clouds emitted from Liddell Power Station during the period approximately 1.30 p.m. and 2 p.m. on 30 April 1998? (3) Did either of the above alleged incidents breach EPA licence conditions for air quality standards? (4) On how many other occasions has there been an emission of this nature? (5) What was the date of the Board of Macquarie Generation’s decision to approve expenditure for capital works especially for modifications needed to burn alternative fuels at Liddell Power Station? (6) What was the date management decided to commence negotiations on the burning of alternative fuels at Liddell Power Station and what was the date this decision was reported to the Board of Macquarie Generation? (7) (a) Has the Occupational Health and Safety Committee had the benefit of any report or inspection from the WorkCover Authority of NSW regarding issues arising from the alternative fuels program or is the committee relying on the EPA licence to burn alternative fuels? (b) If an inspection was held, what was the date of the inspection? (c) What were the principal recommendations?

Answer—

(1) and (2) There is no record of a stack emission irregularity on the day in question. (3) The only generating units in service on 28 April and 30 April 1998 were Units 1 and 3. Stack emission records, monitored by the EPA under the terms of the operating licence issued to Liddell, confirm no irregularities on either day. (4) See answer to (3). (5) Minor modifications to existing plant to handle liquid supplementary fuels at Liddell were commissioned by management. (6) This information is regarded as commercial-in-confidence. (7) (a) The Liddell Occupational Health and Safety Committee has endorsed a subcommittee’s review of the handling procedures for supplementary fuels. WorkCover NSW contributed to the review through comments lodged with the Occupational Health and Safety Committee by the NSW Trades and Labour Council. (b) No inspection has taken place. (c) See answer to question (7) (a).

544 DEPARTMENT OF FAIR TRADING—SYDNEY OFFICE—Mr Turner to ask the Minister for Community Services, Minister for Ageing, Minister for Disability Services and Minister for Women representing the Attorney General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Minister for Fair Trading— 848 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

545 COAL ACQUISITION AMENDMENT ACT 1997—IMPLEMENTATION—Mr Turner to ask the Minister for Mineral Resources and Minister for Fisheries—

6 MAY 1998

(Paper No. 30)

546 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD—Mr Armstrong to ask the Minister for the Olympics—

547 TOXIC DUST OLYMPIC SITE—Mr Armstrong to ask the Minister for the Olympics—

548 LOAD-BASED LICENSING SCHEME—Mr Armstrong to ask the Minister for the Environment—

549 LAND ACQUISITION—HEXHAM SWAMPS—Mr Blackmore to ask the Minister for Mineral Resources and Minister for Fisheries—

550 PUBLIC HOUSING—KITCHEN STOVES—Mr Debnam to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

551 PUBLIC HOUSING—MAINTENANCE—Mr Debnam to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

552 PUBLIC HOUSING—VACANCIES—Mr Debnam to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

553 PUBLIC HOUSING—HEADLEASING—Mr Debnam to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

554 PUBLIC HOUSING—CLIENT SATISFACTION SURVEYS—Mr Debnam to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

555 POLICE BICYCLE PATROLS—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Police—

556 POLICE STRENGTH—HURSTVILLE—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Police—

557 SYDNEY CASINO—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Gaming and Racing and Minister Assisting the Premier on Hunter Development—

558 F3 FREEWAY—DRIVER AID SYSTEM—Mr Hartcher to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

559 RADAR SPEED CHECKS—SCHOOL ZONES—Mr MacCarthy to ask the Minister for Police—

560 SECURITY SERVICES—SYDNEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY—Mr MacCarthy to ask the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

562 POLICE STRENGTH—Mr Oakeshott to ask the Minister for Police—

563 POLICE PUSHBIKE PATROLS—Ms Seaton to ask the Minister for Police—

564 METHADONE PROGRAM—Mrs Skinner to ask the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs— 849 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

565 HEALTH DEPARTMENT STAFF—CRIMINAL SCREENING—Mrs Skinner to ask the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs—

566 REVIEW OF DRIVING PENALTIES—Mr Souris to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

567 FISHING INDUSTRY COMPLAINTS—Mr Turner to ask the Minister for Mineral Resources and Minister for Fisheries—

568 COAL COMPENSATION CLAIMS—Mr Turner to ask the Minister for Mineral Resources and Minister for Fisheries—

7 MAY 1998

(Paper No. 31)

569 RURAL COMMUNITIES CONSULTATIVE COUNCIL—Mr Armstrong to ask the Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—

570 IRRIGATORS ENVIRONMENT LEVY—Mr Cruickshank to ask the Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—

571 POLICE RAID—OATLEY—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Police—

572 POLICE POWERS—CARRYING OUT SEARCHES—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Police—

573 GRANTING OF SEARCH WARRANTS—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Police representing the Attorney General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Minister for Fair Trading—

*574 ANIMAL RESEARCH AND REVIEW PANEL—Mr Harrison asked the Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—

(1) Will he review the current composition of the Animal Research and Review Panel to ensure an independent Chair and a more balanced representation? (2) Will he ensure Animal Care and Ethics Committees (ACEC) are also reviewed to ensure a more equitable balance between researchers and animal welfare representatives? (3) Can he advise the number of prosecutions of animal research institutions since the Act came into effect? (4) What is being done to ensure research institutions and the Animal Research and Review Panel reduce, replace and refine the animals used in research? (5) What rules of confidentiality are ACEC members bound by? 850 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

Answer—

(1) A review of the composition of the Animal Research Review Panel will be conducted as part of a comprehensive review of the Animal Research Act to ensure there is appropriate and balanced representation. (2) The composition of Animal Care and Ethics Committees is determined by the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes, which is adopted nationally. Following a comprehensive review, the 6th edition of this code was published in late 1997. The provisions relating to ethics committees have been strengthened to ensure a more equitable balance of members. A further review would not be appropriate at this stage. (3) The offence provisions in the Animal Research Act with respect to corporations relate to conduct of research without being accredited. There have been no prosecutions for this offence. The Act provides for other legal sanctions in the case of accredited corporations which are in breach of the Code of Practice. These have been applied on a number of occasions, for example, suspension of research or closure of a particular laboratory. (4) It is the responsibility of research institutions and individual researchers to comply with the principles of the Code of Practice which require the reduction, replacement and refinement of animals used in research. One function of the Animal Research Review Panel is to investigate and evaluate the efficacy of the Code of Practice in regulating the conduct of animal research. The panel does this through monitoring and auditing of accredited research establishments. In response to a recommendation of the Regulation Review Committee, the panel will also be carrying out a review of institutional achievement of reduction, replacement and refinement of animal use. (5) Section 56 of the Animal Research Act states: “A person shall not disclose any information obtained in connection with the administration or execution of this Act unless that disclosure is made: (a) with the consent of the person from whom the information was obtained; (b) in connection with the administration or execution of this Act; (c) for the purposes of any legal proceedings arising out of this Act or of any report of any such proceedings; (d) in accordance with a requirement imposed under the Ombudsman Act 1974; or (e) with other lawful excuse.” In addition, the Code of Practice states in Clause 2.2.8: “Before appointment, all members of the AEC should acknowledge in writing their acceptance of the terms of reference of the committee and any requirements for confidentiality required by the institution. The committee should reach agreement on how advice may be sought without breaching confidentiality.”

575 POLICE INVESTIGATION OF DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES CASES—Mr Humpherson to ask the Minister for Police—

576 STATE LIBRARY BUDGET—Ms Moore to ask the Premier, Minister for the Arts and Minister for Ethnic Affairs—

577 INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMITTEE ON POLICE FUNCTIONS—Ms Moore to ask the Minister for Police—

578 TEACHER APPREHENDED VIOLENCE ORDERS—Mr O’Doherty to ask the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs— 851 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

*579 MACQUARIE GENERATION—INCOMPLETE COMBUSTION—Mr Souris asked the Minister for Energy, Minister for Tourism, Minister for Corrective Services, Minister for Emergency Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

(1) Is there evidence in the conduct of the alternative fuels program that substantial incomplete combustion of oil-based materials is occurring? (2) Have substantial quantities of unburned oil-based materials been included as part of the ash waste? (3) Has such oily ash waste been transported to the ash dam disposal area at Liddell Power Station? (4) Is there evidence of oil at the ash dam at Liddell? (5) Has the EPA been made aware of incomplete burning of oil waste being transported to the ash disposal dam? (6) Does the current EPA licence prescribe conditions and content of the ash waste in the ash disposal dam?

Answer—

(1) No. (2) No. (3) Small traces of fuel oil can be present in the ash dam from time-to-time if problems occur during plant start-up. (4) No. Small traces of material are present which could be mistaken for oil. No oil was detected in initial analysis of samples of this material. (5) There is no evidence of incomplete burning of any of the supplementary fuels. The Environment Protection Authority was advised in May 1998 of the presence of the materials referred to in the answer to question (4). No oil was detected in initial analysis of samples of this material. (6) No.

580 OPENING OF LAKE CONJOLA—Mr Turner to ask the Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—

581 SONAR SYSTEM TO HARVEST CARP—Mr Turner to ask the Minister for Mineral Resources and Minister for Fisheries—

582 FISHERIES MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE—Mr Turner to ask the Minister for Mineral Resources and Minister for Fisheries—

583 COAL COMPENSATION—MR AND MRS GRIFFIN—Mr Turner to ask the Minister for Mineral Resources and Minister for Fisheries—

19 MAY 1998

(Paper No. 32)

584 STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT REPORT—Mr Armstrong to ask the Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—

585 STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT REPORT—Mr Armstrong to ask the Minister for the Environment—

586 AVAILABILITY OF CRIME STATISTICS—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Police— 852 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

587 NOISE POLLUTION IN BEXLEY—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

588 NOISE POLLUTION IN BEXLEY—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for the Environment—

589 OPERATING HOURS—TERRIGAL POLICE STATION—Mr Hartcher to ask the Minister for Police—

590 TASK FORCE/OPERATION “DROENLO”—Mr Hartcher to ask the Minister for Police—

591 FUNDING FOR OVERSEAS TRAVEL—Mr Humpherson to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

592 PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARY TRAVEL—Mr Humpherson to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

593 BOARDING HOUSE FIRE SAFETY—Mr MacCarthy to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

594 STAFFING AT BURWOOD RAILWAY STATION—Mr MacCarthy to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

595 THOMAS STREET, ASHFIELD—TRAFFIC COUNTS—Mr MacCarthy to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

596 SERVICES OF HAWKER-BRITTON PTY LTD—Mr Phillips to ask the Premier, Minister for the Arts and Minister for Ethnic Affairs—

597 ROADWORK—M4 MOTORWAY—Mr Phillips to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

598 “FEAST OF SYDNEY”—TOURISM NSW—Mr Phillips to ask the Minister for Energy, Minister for Tourism, Minister for Corrective Services, Minister for Emergency Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

599 POLICE STRESS LEAVE—Mr Schipp to ask the Minister for Police—

600 STATE LIBRARY CATALOGUES—Ms Seaton to ask the Premier, Minister for the Arts and Minister for Ethnic Affairs—

601 RAPID OPIATE DETOXIFICATION—Ms Seaton to ask the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs—

602 DEPARTMENT OF URBAN AFFAIRS AND PLANNING—CORRESPONDENCE—Mr Souris to ask the Minister for Energy, Minister for Tourism, Minister for Corrective Services, Minister for Emergency Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

603 REDBANK DAM SAFETY—Mr Souris to ask the Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—

604 WATER FOR ELECTRICITY GENERATION—Mr Souris to ask the Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Land and Water Conservation— 853 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

605 WAITING TIME AT MANNING BASE HOSPITAL—Mr Turner to ask the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs—

606 ISSUE OF INLAND FISHING LICENCES—Mr Turner to ask the Minister for Mineral Resources and Minister for Fisheries—

607 COAL COMPENSATION SCHEME—OUTSTANDING CLAIMS—Mr Turner to ask the Minister for Mineral Resources and Minister for Fisheries—

20 MAY 1998

(Paper No. 33)

608 AIR-CONDITIONING—YANCO AGRICULTURAL HIGH SCHOOL—Mr Cruickshank to ask the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

609 CANCER SUPPORT SERVICES—Ms Ficarra to ask the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs—

610 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT—CLIFF ROAD, WOLLONGONG—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

611 INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT PLANNING LEGISLATION—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

612 PARKING LAWS—LOCAL COUNCILS—Mr MacCarthy to ask the Minister for Police—

613 DRUG USE IN NEW SOUTH WALES SECONDARY SCHOOLS—Dr Macdonald to ask the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs—

614 SOCOG OFFICE—HAYMARKET—Dr Macdonald to ask the Minister for the Olympics—

615 DRUG USE IN NEW SOUTH WALES SECONDARY SCHOOLS—Dr Macdonald to ask the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

616 ELECTRICITY SALES/GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS—Dr Macdonald to ask the Minister for Energy, Minister for Tourism, Minister for Corrective Services, Minister for Emergency Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

617 M5 EAST PROJECT—Mr Phillips to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

618 BRICKPIT SITE AT HOMEBUSH BAY—Mr Richardson to ask the Minister for the Olympics—

619 CASTLE HILL PUBLIC SCHOOL—Mr Richardson to ask the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

620 ROUSE HILL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT—Mr Richardson to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

621 UNION CARBIDE AND ICI AUSTRALIA SITES AT RHODES—Mr Richardson to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing— 854 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

622 MAIN NORTHERN LINE—STRATHFIELD TO HORNSBY—Mr Richardson to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

623 DIOXIN CONTAMINATION AT HOMEBUSH BAY—Mr Richardson to ask the Minister for the Environment—

624 CRYPTOSPORIDIUM—Mrs Skinner to ask the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs—

625 MORUYA MOTOR REGISTRY—Mr Smith to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

626 RISK ASSESSMENT—SYDNEY AIRPORT TUNNEL—Mr Souris to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

627 TRAFFIC FLOW—METROPOLITAN ROADS—Mr Souris to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

628 TRIPLE ROAD TRAINS—Mr Souris to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

629 ILLEGAL FISH SALES IN INLAND NEW SOUTH WALES—Mr Turner to ask the Minister for Mineral Resources and Minister for Fisheries—

21 MAY 1998

(Paper No. 34)

630 “OPERATION NOAH”—Mr Armstrong to ask the Minister for Police—

631 DORAL MINERAL INDUSTRIES—Mr Armstrong to ask the Minister for Regional Development and Minister for Rural Affairs—

632 WORKCOVER BUILDING AND SAFETY REGULATIONS—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Information Technology, Minister for Forestry, Minister for Ports and Minister Assisting the Premier on Western Sydney representing the Attorney General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Minister for Fair Trading—

633 CAPITAL LAND CORPORATION—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

634 LOCAL GOVERNMENT (APPROVALS) REGULATION—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Local Government—

635 HORSE TRAIL—BELROSE TAFE—Mr Humpherson to ask the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

636 MANLY WHARF INTERCHANGE—Mr Humpherson to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

637 CASINO COMMUNITY BENEFIT FUND—Mr Humpherson to ask the Minister for Gaming and Racing and Minister Assisting the Premier on Hunter Development— 855 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

638 OFFICE FITOUT COSTS—Mr Humpherson to ask the Minister for Regional Development and Minister for Rural Affairs—

639 HORSE TRAIL—BELROSE TAFE—Mr Humpherson to ask the Minister for the Environment—

640 CAPITAL ASSISTANCE GRANTS—Mr Humpherson to ask the Minister for Sport and Recreation—

641 VEHICLE REGISTRATION IN NEW SOUTH WALES—Mr Souris to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

642 TRUST ACCOUNTS—REAL ESTATE AGENTS—Mr Turner to ask the Minister for Community Services, Minister for Ageing, Minister for Disability Services and Minister for Women representing the Attorney General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Minister for Fair Trading—

26 MAY 1998

(Paper No. 35)

643 SYDNEY OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC LOGOS—Mr Armstrong to ask the Minister for the Olympics—

644 EUROPEAN CARP ERADICATION PROGRAMS—Mr Armstrong to ask the Minister for Mineral Resources and Minister for Fisheries—

645 “FAMILIES FIRST” PROGRAM—Ms Ficarra to ask the Premier, Minister for the Arts and Minister for Ethnic Affairs—

646 SYDNEY WATER’S GLENFIELD RESERVE—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

647 “FAMILIES FIRST” PROGRAM—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Community Services, Minister for Ageing, Minister for Disability Services and Minister for Women—

648 HORSE RIDING IN POPRAN NATIONAL PARK—Mr Hartcher to ask the Minister for the Environment—

649 STORAGE OF BUS STOP SEATS—Mr MacCarthy to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

650 TRESPASS ON SCHOOL PROPERTY—Mr O’Doherty to ask the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

651 STUDENT EXCLUSION/EXPULSION—Mr O’Doherty to ask the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

652 PENSHURST PUBLIC SCHOOL REDEVELOPMENT—Mr O’Doherty to ask the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

653 POLICE SPECIAL BRANCH FILES—Mr O’Farrell to ask the Minister for Police—

654 POLICE PATROLS—RAILWAY STATIONS—Mr O’Farrell to ask the Minister for Police— 856 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

655 SAFE STATIONS PROGRAM—Mr O’Farrell to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

656 POLICE PRISON ESCORTS—Ms Seaton to ask the Minister for Police—

657 SEAMEN’S UNION BUILDING—Ms Seaton to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

658 HEAVY VEHICLE INFRINGEMENT NOTICES—Mr Souris to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

27 MAY 1998

(Paper No. 36)

659 POLICE STATIONS IN THE LOWER HUNTER—Mr Blackmore to ask the Minister for Police—

660 DIESEL GENERATOR CONTRACTS—Ms Ficarra to ask the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs—

661 RECYCLING TASKFORCE’S ROLE—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for the Environment—

662 REPORT “BENCHMARKING LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE IN NSW”—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Local Government—

663 QUESTION 361—REPUCOM—Mr Hartcher to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

664 DRIVING SCHOOL ACCREDITATION—Dr Kernohan to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

665 STANDARDS FOR DRIVING SCHOOLS—Dr Kernohan to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

666 DRUG USE IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS—Dr Macdonald to ask the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs—

667 SCHOOL ISOLATION ROOMS—Mr O’Doherty to ask the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

668 MOUNT DRUITT HIGH SCHOOL—Mr O’Doherty to ask the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

669 RATIO OF STUDENTS TO COUNSELLORS—Mr O’Doherty to ask the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

670 POLICE STRENGTH—GORDON AND HORNSBY POLICE STATIONS—Mr O’Farrell to ask the Minister for Police—

671 CIVILIAN PERSONNEL—GORDON AND HORNSBY POLICE STATIONS—Mr O’Farrell to ask the Minister for Police— 857 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

672 DETECTIVES—GORDON AND HORNSBY POLICE STATIONS—Mr O’Farrell to ask the Minister for Police—

673 RECYCLING—GREATER SYDNEY REGION—Mr Richardson to ask the Minister for the Environment—

674 “MILLENNIUM BUG”—HOSPITALS—Mrs Skinner to ask the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs—

675 GOVERNMENT PRINTING SERVICE—Mr Souris to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads representing the Minister for Public Works and Services—

676 REVIEW OF DRIVING PENALTIES—Mr Souris to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

28 MAY 1998

(Paper No. 37)

677 LOCAL GOVERNMENT RECYCLING CO-OPERATIVE—Mrs Chikarovski to ask the Minister for the Environment—

678 WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS—Mrs Chikarovski to ask the Minister for the Environment—

679 SMOKY CAPE LIGHTHOUSE—KUNDERANG HOMESTEAD—Mrs Chikarovski to ask the Minister for the Environment—

680 ACCOMMODATION EXPENSE—SMOKY CAPE LIGHTHOUSE—Mrs Chikarovski to ask the Minister for the Environment—

681 ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCILS—Ms Ficarra to ask the Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs—

682 RIVERWOOD “SHOPFRONT STYLE” POLICE STATION—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Police—

683 RIVERWOOD POLICE FOOT PATROLS—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Police—

684 STATE SCHOOL TEACHER NUMBERS—Mr Humpherson to ask the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

685 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING ACCOMMODATION—Mr Humpherson to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing— 858 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

686 BULAHDELAH BYPASS—Mr Humpherson to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

687 DETECTIVES—GORDON AND HORNSBY POLICE STATIONS—Mr O’Farrell to ask the Minister for Police—

688 POLICE STRENGTH—GORDON AND HORNSBY POLICE STATIONS—Mr O’Farrell to ask the Minister for Police—

689 CIVILIAN PERSONNEL—GORDON AND HORNSBY POLICE STATIONS—Mr O’Farrell to ask the Minister for Police—

690 RURAL AND REGIONAL OLYMPIC BUSINESS EXPO—Ms Seaton to ask the Minister for Regional Development and Minister for Rural Affairs—

691 COASTAL EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE SERVICES—Mr Turner to ask the Minister for Education and Training and Minister Assisting the Premier on Youth Affairs—

2 JUNE 1998

(Paper No. 38)

692 PUBLIC HOUSING—ASSET SALE—Mr Debnam to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

For each of the following time periods: (a) 1 July 1995 to 30 June 1996; (b) 1 July 1996 to 30 June 1997; (c) 1 July 1997 to 30 April 1998— (1) What is the address of each Department of Housing property sold? (2) What was the price paid for each property sold? (3) What was the dwelling type and number of bedrooms for each property sold?

693 PUBLIC HOUSING—ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN—Mr Debnam to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

(1) Has the Department of Housing completed an Asset Management Plan for housing? (2) How many properties and what are the addresses of properties assessed under the Asset Management Plan? (3) Will he provide a copy of the Asset Management Plan? (4) When was the Asset Management Plan completed and is it to be reviewed as an ongoing process? (5) What was the total cost of the Asset Management Plan? (6) What were the recommendations of Asset Management Plan? (7) What action did the Department of Housing take as a result of the Asset Management Plan? (8) What assets were disposed of by the Department of Housing as a result of the Asset Management Plan? (9) What is the address and price paid for each asset sold as a result of the Asset Management Plan? 859 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

694 PUBLIC HOUSING SECURITY—Mr Debnam to ask the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Minister for Housing—

In relation to his 26 May 1998 announcement of a $6.4 million public housing safety program in Redfern and Waterloo— (1) What quotes were obtained, from which contractors, and what were the details of the quotes? (2) Which contractors will install the security systems? (3) What is the role of each contractor? (4) For each property, what is the breakdown by address for: (a) the number of residences? (b) the number of vacant residences as at 26 May 1998? (c) the type of dwelling per property and number of bedrooms? (d) the total cost per property? (e) the cost per residence?

695 POLICE RAID ON 14 APRIL 1998—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Police—

During the conduct of a raid on the Schepis family home at 16 Russell Street, Oatley, on 14 April 1998, were departmental guidelines adhered to regarding videotaping of the raid in its entirety, room- by-room, in a systematic manner or was a “scatter gun” approach adopted and an incomplete video recording the result?

696 EPA MONITORING—PILKINGTON GLASS—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for the Environment—

(1) What EPA monitoring has occurred on the “brown smoke/exhaust” that regularly emanates from the single large exhaust stack belonging to Pilkington Glass at Ingleburn? (2) Are there measures to reduce such pollution?

697 SCHOOL CROSSING—HURSTVILLE SOUTH PUBLIC SCHOOL—Ms Ficarra to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) Given the number of schoolchildren attending Hurstville South Public School and having to cross Hillcrest Avenue, an extremely heavily trafficked secondary road, why isn’t the pedestrian crossing at Hillcrest Avenue and Denman Street, Hurstville, a designated school crossing? (2) Is the presence of a “lollipop person” guaranteed for the sake of the children’s safety? (3) What other RTA measures can improve pedestrian safety at this crossing?

698 FIRE FIGHTERS IN NEW SOUTH WALES—Mr Hartcher to ask the Minister for Energy, Minister for Tourism, Minister for Corrective Services, Minister for Emergency Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

(1) Is there an organisation of retained fire fighters in New South Wales called the “Retained Fire Fighters Federation of New South Wales Incorporated”? (2) (a) Has he met representatives of the federation? (b) If so, when? (c) If not, why not? (3) How many members does the federation have? (4) How many members does the Fire Brigade Employees Union have? 860 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Wednesday 3 June 1998

(5) How often in the last 12 months has he met representatives of the Fire Brigades Employees Union? (6) (a) Did he issue a directive in 1995 to the Commissioner not to meet with the federation? (b) If so, when? (c) If not, why not? (7) Does the Commissioner meet with the Fire Brigades Employees Union representatives? (8) How many permanent fire fighters are employed by NSW Fire Brigades? (9) How many retained fire fighters are employed by NSW Fire Brigades?

699 FIRE STATIONS CONSTRUCTION—Mr Hartcher to ask the Minister for Energy, Minister for Tourism, Minister for Corrective Services, Minister for Emergency Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

(1) How many permanent fire fighters employed by NSW Fire Brigades live on the Central Coast (Gosford City, Wyong Shire)? (2) Have NSW Fire Brigades proposed to construct new fire stations at: (a) Bateau Bay? (b) Empire Bay? (c) Kincumber? (d) Kariong? (3) What is the estimated cost of each new proposed fire station? (4) (a) What is the anticipated staffing level of each new proposed fire station? (b) How many permanent staff? (c) How many retained staff? (5) What arrangements have been made with the Fire Brigades Employees Union in relation to the proposed new stations?

700 INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES—NSW FIRE BRIGADES—Mr Hartcher to ask the Minister for Energy, Minister for Tourism, Minister for Corrective Services, Minister for Emergency Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

(1) How many days have been lost due to industrial disputes in NSW Fire Brigades in: (a) 1995? (b) 1996? (c) 1997? (d) 1998? (2) In respect of each dispute: (a) What was the duration? (b) What was the cause? (c) Was the NSW Fire Brigades Employees Union involved? (3) How many proceedings have there been in the Industrial Relations Commission of NSW between NSW Fire Brigades and the NSW Fire Brigades Employees Union since April 1995? (4) In respect of each court proceeding: (a) When was it lodged? (b) By which party? (c) Seeking what orders? (d) At what cost to NSW Fire Brigades? 861

701 RAILWAY SECURITY—Mr MacCarthy to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) When will improved lighting, video surveillance and help points, as part of the recently announced program of safety improvements, be installed at the following railway stations: (a) Ashfield? (b) Burwood? (c) Croydon? (d) Flemington? (e) Homebush? (f) Strathfield? (g) Summer Hill? (h) Rhodes? (i) Concord West? (j) North Strathfield? (2) Will the proposed program of security guards involve security guards joining every train on the network at 7 p.m. or joining those services which commence after 7 p.m.?

702 DOMESTIC ELECTRICITY TARIFF—Mr MacCarthy to ask the Minister for Energy, Minister for Tourism, Minister for Corrective Services, Minister for Emergency Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

(1) What was the cost to a Sydney domestic electricity consumer of 2,000 kWh of electricity on the domestic tariff plus 1,000 kWh of off-peak electricity per quarter as at 30 June in each of the years 1987 to 1998, inclusive? (2) What average cost per kilowatt hour do these figures represent? (3) What are the real cost equivalents of the answers in (1) and (2) above based upon the Sydney CPI?

703 NORTH SHORE RAIL SECURITY—Mr O’Farrell to ask the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) Do private security guards patrol trains operating on the: (a) North Shore railway line? (b) Main North railway line? (2) If yes, how often and at what times? (3) Have recorded incidents on trains operating on these two lines fallen as a result of this activity? (4) If yes, what are the latest comparable figures?

704 CATERING—SYDNEY HARBOUR REGATTA OLYMPIC TEST EVENT—Mr Souris to ask the Minister for the Olympics—

(1) Is there a current tender for catering during 16 September 1998 to 27 September 1998 at Rushcutters Bay for a Sydney Harbour regatta Olympic test event? (2) Is the catering required continuously each day for 600 and one dinner for 1,000? (3) Will Southcorp Wines be the sole supplier of wines to all Olympic events? (4) Does this exclusive deal also include Olympic test events in 1998? (5) Does this exclusive deal mean that all wine producers in Australia except one are locked out of the Olympics for a period of 2½ years? (6) Does this exclusive deal conform with the Trade Practices Act? (7) Is this how New South Wales will share the spirit of the Olympics? ______Authorised by the Parliament of New South Wales