DOCSLIB.ORG

South Carolina Statewide Rail Plan Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South Carolina Statewide Rail Plan Update SOUTH CAROLINA STATEWIDE RAIL PLAN UPDATE 2020 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 November 19, 2020 Mr. Doug Frate Intermodal and Freight Programs South Carolina Department of Transportation 955 Park Street Columbia, SC 29202 Dear Mr. Frate, The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has completed its review of the 2020 South Carolina State Rail Plan (also referred to as the State Rail Plan or SRP). FRA’s review of the SRP found that it contained the required elements in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 22705 and FRA’s 2013 State Rail Plan Guidance. This letter serves as notice that FRA formally accepts the SRP. While FRA finds that the SRP meets the minimum requirements, FRA recommends addressing the following points in future updates of the SRP: • Consider reorganizing section 3.2.1 Current Southeastern Rail Activity to clarify the history of the rail governance bodies in the Southeast and how they work together. Pages 81-83 presents the relevant information, but the chronology of the governance bodies and their individual roles within the Southeast are unclear. • In section 3.4 on page 87 consider clarifying that SCDOT participated in the Southeast Regional Rail Plan and acted as a lead stakeholder. Also, clarify the purpose of the study as the establishment of a long-term vision for the implementation and management of passenger rail in the Southeast. Consider discussing the role of the SE Plan in the development of SCDOT’s SRP and in the work underway through the Southeast Corridor Commission. • In Chapter 5, considering identifying the Atlanta- Charlotte Tier II environmental study as part of South Carolina’s Rail Service and Investment Program. Section 11315(a)(1) of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (P.L. 114-94, December 4, 2015) revised the requirement for State-approved plans to be resubmitted to FRA no less frequently than once every 4 years (previously 5 years). As such, FRA looks forward to working with you on the next iteration of the South Carolina State Rail Plan due in November 2024. FRA looks forward to a continued partnership with the State of South Carolina to build and maintain a safe, reliable, and efficient U.S. rail network. Sincerely, Frances S. Bourne Acting Chief National Rail Planning Division 2 South Carolina Rail Plan 2040 Update 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 the role of rail in statewide transportation ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 South Carolina’s Goals for Multimodal Transportation ............................................................. 1 1.1.1 Rail Plan Goals and Objectives ...................................................................................... 2 1.2 The Role of Rail Transportation in South Carolina ..................................................................... 4 1.2.1 Rail Freight .................................................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 Rail Traffic Growth ........................................................................................................ 5 1.2.3 The Rail System’s Impact on the State Economy .......................................................... 6 1.2.4 Rail’s Increasing Future Role ......................................................................................... 6 1.3 Institutional Governance Structure of the State Rail Programs ................................................. 6 1.4 Rail Funding in South Carolina ................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Summary of Freight and Passenger Rail Services ....................................................................... 7 1.5.1 Rail Services ................................................................................................................... 7 1.5.2 Initiatives and Plans ...................................................................................................... 8 2 South Carolina’s Existing Rail System ................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Existing Rail System Description and Inventory ......................................................................... 9 2.1.1 Existing System, Services, and Performance ................................................................. 9 2.1.2 Freight and Passenger Terminals ................................................................................ 26 2.1.3 Objectives for Rail Passenger Services ........................................................................ 31 2.1.4 Performance Evaluation of Rail Passenger Services ................................................... 31 2.1.5 Public Financing for Rail Projects ................................................................................ 35 2.1.6 Rail Safety and Security Programs .............................................................................. 37 2.1.7 Rail Transportation’s Impacts ..................................................................................... 46 2.2 Existing Rail System: Trends and Forecasts ............................................................................. 55 2.2.1 Demographic and Economic Growth Factors ............................................................. 55 2.2.2 Freight Demand and Growth ...................................................................................... 62 2.2.3 Passenger Travel Demand and Growth ....................................................................... 66 2.2.4 Fuel Cost Trends .......................................................................................................... 66 2.2.5 Rail Congestion Trends ................................................................................................ 67 2.2.6 Highway and Airport Congestion Trends .................................................................... 67 2.2.7 Land Use Trends .......................................................................................................... 70 2.3 Existing Rail System: Rail Service Needs and Opportunities .................................................... 71 2.3.1 Key Issues Impacting Rail Service ................................................................................ 71 2.3.2 Opportunities to Address Rail Needs and Issues ........................................................ 72 3 Proposed Passenger Rail Improvements and Investments ................................................................ 74 3.1 Proposed Passenger Rail Services ............................................................................................ 74 3.1.1 Proposed High Speed Passenger Services ................................................................... 74 3.1.2 Connecting Atlanta to Charlotte ................................................................................. 76 3.2 History of the Southeast High Speed Rail Corridor (SEHSR) and Previous Studies .................. 78 3.2.1 Current Southeastern Rail Activity .............................................................................. 80 3.3 Intercity Passenger Rail Corridors ............................................................................................ 83 i South Carolina Rail Plan 2040 Update 2019 3.4 Proposed Commuter Rail Services ........................................................................................... 83 Charleston ................................................................................................................................ 85 Greenville‐Spartanburg ............................................................................................................ 85 Columbia .................................................................................................................................. 87 Rock Hill .................................................................................................................................... 89 Anderson County ...................................................................................................................... 90 4 Proposed Freight Rail Improvements and Investments ..................................................................... 91 4.1 Rail Freight Needs, Class I Railroads ......................................................................................... 91 4.1.1 CSX Transportation ...................................................................................................... 91 4.1.2 Norfolk Southern ......................................................................................................... 91 4.2 Rail Freight Needs, Short Line Railroads .................................................................................. 91 4.2.1 Palmetto Railways Industrial Rail Line (Camp Hall Commerce Park) .......................... 93 5 The State’s Long‐Range Rail Service and Investment Program ......................................................... 95 5.1 South Carolina’s Rail Vision ...................................................................................................... 95 5.2 Integration of the Rail Vision with Other Transportation Plans ............................................... 97 5.3 Planned Rail Planning Process Changes ................................................................................... 97 5.4 Potential Effects of Rail Program Implementation .................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sustaining the KCMO Boulevard and Parkway System
    KCMO Boulevard and Parkway System The “Three Legs” Sustaining the KCMO Boulevard and Parkway System KCMO Boulevard and Parkway System History Geometry Land Use Questions What was the purpose of the parks and boulevard system in Kansas City, Missouri? History What are the defining characteristics of a boulevard and a parkway? Geometry What makes them different from an ordinary street or each other? Land Use Perspective History, geometry, and land use are the three things that set our Boulevards & Parkways apart from being “any other street”. The changes requested to the zoning code are a necessary and vital part to the preservation of Kansas City’s Neighborhoods and the Boulevard & Parkway system! History The answers can be found in: a) the 1893 Report of the Board of Park Commissioners; “The Kansas City Park System and Its Effect on the City Plan” by George E. Kessler; b) various Annual Reports to the Board of Commissioners; c) the 1920 booklet “Souvenir” The Park and Boulevard System of Kansas City, Missouri; d) the historic surveys that were completed in 1989 and 1991 and e) the Boulevard and Parkway Standards adopted by Board of Park Commissioners August 28, 2010 History In 1917 Kessler stated: “The boulevards and parkways of Kansas City have accomplished the real purpose outlined by Mr. Meyer in the first report 1893, namely, the tying together all sections and the uniting of Kansas City as a whole into a community whose purposes and actions are for the benefit of the city as a whole at all times.” History Purpose of the Historic Parks, Boulevard & Parkway System Make communication between the different sections of the city, commercial, residential and to some extent industrial direct and distinctive.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2006-24 CSX Transportati
    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2006-24 CSX Transportation (CSX) Richmond, Virginia April 22, 2006 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT FRA File # HQ-2006-24 FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION 1.Name of Railroad Operating Train #1 1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. CSX Transportation [CSX ] CSX R000022015 2.Name of Railroad Operating Train #2 2a. Alphabetic Code 2b. Railroad Accident/Incident N/A N/A N/A 3.Name of Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance: 3a. Alphabetic Code 3b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. CSX Transportation [CSX ] CSX N/A 4. U.S. DOT_AAR Grade Crossing Identification Number 5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident Month Day Year 04 22 2006 05:19:00 AM PM 7. Type of Accident/Indicent 1. Derailment 4. Side collision 7. Hwy-rail crossing 10. Explosion-detonation 13. Other (single entry in code box) 2. Head on collision 5. Raking collision 8. RR grade crossing 11. Fire/violent rupture (describe in narrative) 3. Rear end collision 6. Broken Train collision 9. Obstruction 12. Other impacts 01 8. Cars Carrying 9. HAZMAT Cars 10. Cars Releasing 11. People 12. Division HAZMAT Damaged/Derailed HAZMAT Evacuated 0 0 0 0 FLORENCE 13. Nearest City/Town 14.
    [Show full text]
  • December 07 LE&T News
    LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN DECEMBER 2007 PUBLISHED BY THENEWS BLET, A DIVISION OF THE RAIL CONFERENCE, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS Happy Holidays! Thousands turn out for annual CSX Santa Special Thousands of children and families train left Erwin, Tenn., on November 16 turned out on November 17 for the 65th and traveled to Kingsport, Tenn., where annual CSX Santa Claus Special. The the toys and food for the needy were annual train follows a 110-mile stretch loaded on the train. They then traveled in the rural mountain communities of to Shelby, Ky., for the night, and on No- Eastern Kentucky, western Virginia vember 17, the Santa Train began its and Northeast Tennessee, and is one run from Shelby, Ky. to Kingsport, Tenn. of Appalacia’s most anticipated holiday Country singer Patty Loveless was traditions. the special guest on the train this year. Santa himself rode in the caboose Brother Peoples said that including and was part of the team that distrib- Shelby, one of the 14 stops along the uted more than 15 tons of toys at 14 route caters to children with special stops along the route. needs. Another major player on the team As important as the locomotive en- was locomotive engineer Alf Peoples, a gineer is on the Santa Train, a team of CSX engineer and member of Division volunteers make sure everyone stays 781 in Erwin, Tenn. Brother Peoples safe along the route. worked as locomotive engineer of the “There are many BLET and UTU Santa Claus Special this year. members all along the 110 mile route Brother Peoples is a veteran Santa to keep the crowds out of the track as Train engineer, and involvement with the train arrives,” he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus and Shared-Ride Taxi Use in Two Small Urban Areas
    Bus and Shared-Ride Taxi Use in Two Small Urban Areas David P. Middendorf, Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Company Kenneth W. Heathington, University of Tennessee The demand for publicly owned fixed-route. fixed-schedule bus service are used for work and business-related trips to and was compared with tho demand for privately owned shared-ride taxi ser­ within CBDs and for short social, shopping, medical, vice in Davenport. Iowa, and Hicksville, New York, through on-board and personal business trips. surveys end cab company dispatch records and driver logs. The bus and In many small cities and in many suburbs of large slmrcd·ride taxi systems in Davenport com11eted for the off.peak-period travel market. During off-peak hours, the taxis tended to attract social· metropol.il;e:H!:i, l.lus~s nd taxicabs operate within tlie recreation, medical, and per onal business trips between widely scattered same jlu·isclictions and may compete for the same public origins and destinations, while the buses tended 10 attract shopping and transportation market. Two examples of small commu­ personal business trips to the CBD. The shared-ride taxi system in Hicks· nities in which buses and ta.xis coexist are Davenport, ville, in addition to providing many-to·many service, competed with the Iowa, and Hicksville, New York. The markets, eco­ counlywide bus system as a feeder system to the Long Island commuter nomic characteristics, organization, management, and railroad network. In each study area, the markets of each mode of public operation of the taxicab systems sel'Ving these commu­ transportation were similar.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Timetables-Virginia Service
    Effective July 13, 2019 VIRGINIA SERVICE - Southbound serving BOSTON - NEW YORK - WASHINGTON DC - CHARLOTTESVILLE - ROANOKE - RICHMOND - NEWPORT NEWS - NORFOLK and intermediate stations Amtrak.com 1-800-USA-RAIL Northeast Northeast Northeast Silver Northeast Northeast Service/Train Name4 Palmetto Palmetto Cardinal Carolinian Carolinian Regional Regional Regional Star Regional Regional Train Number4 65 67 89 89 51 79 79 95 91 195 125 Normal Days of Operation4 FrSa Su-Th SaSu Mo-Fr SuWeFr SaSu Mo-Fr Mo-Fr Daily SaSu Mo-Fr Will Also Operate4 9/1 9/2 9/2 9/2 Will Not Operate4 9/1 9/2 9/2 9/2 9/2 R B y R B y R B y R B y R B s R B y R B y R B R s y R B R B On Board Service4 Q l å O Q l å O l å O l å O r l å O l å O l å O y Q å l å O y Q å y Q å Symbol 6 R95 BOSTON, MA ∑w- Dp l9 30P l9 30P 6 10A 6 30A 86 10A –South Station Boston, MA–Back Bay Station ∑v- R9 36P R9 36P R6 15A R6 35A 8R6 15A Route 128, MA ∑w- lR9 50P lR9 50P R6 25A R6 46A 8R6 25A Providence, RI ∑w- l10 22P l10 22P 6 50A 7 11A 86 50A Kingston, RI (b(™, i(¶) ∑w- 10 48P 10 48P 7 11A 7 32A 87 11A Westerly, RI >w- 11 05P 11 05P 7 25A 7 47A 87 25A Mystic, CT > 11 17P 11 17P New London, CT (Casino b) ∑v- 11 31P 11 31P 7 45A 8 08A 87 45A Old Saybrook, CT ∑w- 11 53P 11 53P 8 04A 8 27A 88 04A Springfield, MA ∑v- 7 05A 7 25A 7 05A Windsor Locks, CT > 7 24A 7 44A 7 24A Windsor, CT > 7 29A 7 49A 7 29A Train 495 Train 495 Hartford, CT ∑v- 7 39A Train 405 7 59A 7 39A Berlin, CT >v D7 49A 8 10A D7 49A Meriden, CT >v D7 58A 8 19A D7 58A Wallingford, CT > D8 06A 8 27A D8 06A State Street, CT > q 8 19A 8 40A 8 19A New Haven, CT ∑v- Ar q q 8 27A 8 47A 8 27A NEW HAVEN, CT ∑v- Ar 12 30A 12 30A 4 8 41A 4 9 03A 4 88 41A Dp l12 50A l12 50A 8 43A 9 05A 88 43A Bridgeport, CT >w- 9 29A Stamford, CT ∑w- 1 36A 1 36A 9 30A 9 59A 89 30A New Rochelle, NY >w- q 10 21A NEW YORK, NY ∑w- Ar 2 30A 2 30A 10 22A 10 51A 810 22A –Penn Station Dp l3 00A l3 25A l6 02A l5 51A l6 45A l7 17A l7 25A 10 35A l11 02A 11 05A 11 35A Newark, NJ ∑w- 3 20A 3 45A lR6 19A lR6 08A lR7 05A lR7 39A lR7 44A 10 53A lR11 22A 11 23A 11 52A Newark Liberty Intl.
    [Show full text]
  • Download .Pdf
    GEOLOGY OF THE PIEDMONT AND COASTAL PLAIN NEAR PAGELAND, SOUTH CAROLINA AND WADESBORO, NORTH CAROLINA By HENRY BELL III1 J. ROBERT BUTLER2 DAVID E. HOWELL3 WALTER H. WHEELER2 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va. 22092 2 Dept. of Geology, Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27214 3 Division of Geology, South Carolina State Development Board, Harbison Forest Road, Columbia, S. C. 29210 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . .. .. 1 Geologic studies. .. .. 1 Acknowledgements . .. .. 1 METAMORPHIC ROCKS . .. .. 2 GRANITE PLUTONS. .. .. 2 Liberty Hill pluton. .. .. 3 Pageland pluton . .. .. 3 Lilesville pluton. .. .. 3 Gabbro .. .. .. 4 TRIASSIC BASINS. .. .. 4 MESOZOIC DIABASE DIKES . .. .. 5 COASTAL PLAIN FORMATIONS. .. .. 5 Middendorf Formation. .. .. 5 Citronelle Formation . .. .. 6 Pinehurst Formation. .. .. 6 Brandywine Formation . .. .. 7 FIELD TRIP LOG FOR FIRST DAY . .. .. 7 FIELD TRIP LOG FOR SECOND DAY. .. .. 13 REFERENCES. .. .. .. 15 ILLUSTRATIONS Geologic map . .. .. .download Field trip routs . .. .. .. .download Sketch map of Hiale gold mine area . .. .. 10 Sketch of east wall of borrow pit in northern part of Haile mine area. 11 CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Guidebook for 1974 Annual Meeting Pages 1-16 GEOLOGY OF THE PIEDMONT AND COASTAL PLAIN NEAR PAGELAND, SOUTH CAROLINA AND WADESBORO, NORTH CAROLINA Henry Bell III U.S. Geological Survey Reston, Va. 22092 J. Robert Butler Dept. of Geology Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27214 David E. Howell Division of Geology, South Carolina State Development Board Harbison Forest Road, Columbia, S. C. 29210 Walther H. Wheele Dept. of Geology Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27214 INTRODUCTION information; these references are listed at appropriate places in the following text. Butler and Ragland (1969) and Fulla- Northeastern South Carolina and the adjacent part of gar (1971) studied the petrology and age relationships of North Carolina is a particularly good area for geologic field some of the intrusive rocks of this area.
    [Show full text]
  • American Title a Sociation ~ ~
    OFFICIAL PUBLICATION AMERICAN TITLE A SOCIATION ~ ~ VOUJME XXXVI JUNE, 1957 NUMBER 6 TITLE NEWS Official Publication of THE AMERICAN TITLE ASSOCIATION 3608 Guardian Building-Detroit 26, Michigan Volume XXXVI June, 1957 Number 6 Table of Contents Introduction-The Federal Highway Program ......... ... ................ .. .................... 2 J. E. Sheridan Highway Laws Relating to Controlled Access Roads ..... .. ....... ........... 6 Norman A. Erbe Title Companies and the Expanded Right of Way Problems ...... ............. .. 39 , Daniel W. Rosencrans Arthur A. Anderson Samuel J. Some William A . Thuma INTRODUCTION The Federal Highway Program J. E. SHERIDAN We are extremely grateful to Nor­ veloped its planning sufficiently to man A. Erbe, Attorney General of the show to the satisfaction of the dis­ State of Iowa, for permission to re­ trict engineer the effect of the pro­ print his splendid brief embracing posed construction upon adjace.nt the highway laws of various states property, the treatment of access con­ relating to the control in access roads. trol in the area of Federal acquisi­ Mr. Erbe originally presented this m tion, and that appropriate arrange­ narrative form before the convention ments have been made for mainte­ of the Iowa Title Association in May nance and supervision over the land of this year. As is readily ascertain­ to be acquired and held in the name able, this is the result of a compre­ of the United States pending transfer hensive study of various laws touch· of title and jurisdiction to the State ing on the incidents of highway regu­ or the proper subdivision thereof." lations. Additionally, we are privi­ It is suggested that our members leged to carry the panel discussion bring this quoted portion to the at­ of the American Right of Way Asso­ tention of officers of the Highway ciation Convention held in Chicago, Department and the office of its legal May 16 and 17, dealing with "Title division, plus the Office of the Attor­ Companies and the Expanded Right ney General within the members' ju­ of Way Problems".
    [Show full text]
  • Truly Spectacular!
    Directions to Western Park Entrance Directions to Eastern Park Entrance Hiking Paths Observation Decks Sussex WESTERN PARK ENTRANCE Sussex Corner Fundy Trail All trail distances are one-way unless indicated with an * Accessible off trails within the parkway - may require a Parkway Easy Moderate Strenuous short hike Waterford St. Martins Hearst Lodge A Multi-Use Trail 10 km 1 Flowerpot Rock – 1 9 Sluiceway Observation Deck Alma Harbour 39 km Opening B Sea Captains’ Burial Ground Footpath 0.34 km 2 Flowerpot Rock – 2 10 Suspension Footbridge Sea Caves 2021 7 km H C Flowerpot Rock Scenic Footpath 1.5 km 3 Flowerpot Rock – 3 Observation Deck P9 I D 11 Interpretive Centre Bradshaw Scenic Footpath 0.6 km 4 Fuller Falls EASTERN PARK ENTRANCE Observation Deck E Pioneer Trail Loop * 0.48 km Observation Deck Fundy Trail Parkway 12 Tufts’ Plateau F Big Salmon River Loop * 1.2 km 5 Lighthouse Map Legend Lookouts Beaches G Suspension Footbridge Trail 0.39 km 13 Long Beach Observation Deck Easily accessed by driving James Catt Observation Deck 0 Beach 1 Melvin Beach L H 14 McCumber Brook 4 the parkway Monument 7 10 Hearst Lodge Scenic Footpath 2.7 km 6 Isle Haute EASTERN PARK Electric Vehicle Charge Station 2 Pangburn Beach I Cranberry Brook Loop * 4.8 km Observation Deck 1 1 Fox Rock Lookout Mitchell Franklin Bridge Observation Deck ENTRANCE S F Fundy Trail Parkway - 30 km 3 Big Salmon River Beach Suspension 6 J Big Salmon to Long Beach Footpath 4.4 km 15 McCumber Brook 2 Fownes Head Lookout 7 Waterfowl ROUTE TO (cars, buses, motorcycles) 4 Long Beach
    [Show full text]
  • ALLEY (NS) – Washington Avenue to Wright Avenue, Deane Boulevard to Quincy Avenue
    ALLEY (NS) – Washington Avenue to Wright Avenue, Deane Boulevard to Quincy Avenue Alderman District 9 – Trevor Jung Existing pavement - Bituminous Right-of-way width - 16’ PCI – Alleys not rated Improvement Cost - Concrete at $74.00/ft Alderman Request Last Public Hearing Date – Never City of Racine - Assessment Schedule CITY ENGINEER'S OFFICE AUTHORITY - Benefits and Damage FOR: PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVING RESOLUTION NUMBER 058319 15-May-20 LOCATION - Alley (NS) from Washington Ave to Wright Ave, Deane Blv Page 1 of 2 TAXNO NAME FRONTAGE RATE BENEFITS ADJUST SPEC. ADJ. ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS ASSESSMENT 10192000 Mauer, Kristi L. 35.000$74.00 $2,590.00 $0.00 $0.00 1367 Deane Boulevard 1367 Deane Boulevard Racine, WI 53405 $2,590.00 10193000 Arndt, Ryan 35.000$74.00 $2,590.00 $0.00 $0.00 1365 Deane Boulevard 1365 Deane Boulevard Racine, WI 53405 $2,590.00 10194000 Kosterman, Robert P. & Margaret M. 35.000$74.00 $2,590.00 $0.00 $0.00 1363 Deane Boulevard 1363 Deane Boulevard Racine, WI 53405 $2,590.00 10195000 Lochowitz, Justin 35.000$74.00 $2,590.00 $0.00 $0.00 1359 Deane Boulevard 1359 Deane Boulevard Racine, WI 53405 $2,590.00 10195000 Lochowitz, Justin 35.000$74.00 $2,590.00 $0.00 $0.00 1359 Deane Boulevard 1359 Deane Boulevard Racine, WI 53405 $2,590.00 10196000 Johnson, Kenneth Sr. 35.000$74.00 $2,590.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cloyd, Christina 1355 Deane Boulevard 1355 Deane Boulevard Racine, WI 53405 $2,590.00 10197000 Garcia, Gregory 40.000$74.00 $2,960.00 $0.00 $0.00 1351 Deane Boulevard 1351 Deane Boulevard Racine, WI 53405 $2,960.00 10198000 Williams, Randall 40.000$74.00 $2,960.00 $0.00 $0.00 Veltus, Julie 1345 Deane Boulevard 5735 Ridgecrest Drive Racine, WI 53403 $2,960.00 10199000 Degroot, Matthew J.
    [Show full text]
  • 95 Express Phase 3A-1 FPN #S: 433108-4-52-01 & 428009-1-52-01
    95 Express Phase 3A-1 FPN #s: 433108-4-52-01 & 428009-1-52-01 95 Express Phase 3A-1 will extend the existing express lanes north from just south of Broward Boulevard to just north of Commercial Boulevard in Broward County. One lane will be added and the High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane will be Contact Us… converted to create two express lanes in each direction. This project includes ramp signalization from Hallandale Beach Boulevard to Commercial Boulevard. Other Email: work includes: installing Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) and tolling [email protected] equipment; widening bridges; and installing noise barrier walls at locations along I- 95 Southbound between Broward Boulevard and NW 6th Street, and along I-95 Northbound between Powerline Road and Commercial Boulevard. Contract time Call: for this $149 million project began Monday, October 4, 2015, with design activities currently underway. Construction began August 21, 2016, and is expected to be Construction PIO completed Spring 2020. Please note that this schedule is subject to change due to Office: weather or other unforeseen circumstances. (954) 299-6561 As of Winter 2016, project activities are as follows: • Or Design, survey and maintenance activities • Broward Boulevard ramp widening and reconstruction • Broward Boulevard widening and paving For information about • I-95 northbound milling and resurfacing 95 Express including lane closure Lane Closures & Traffic Impacts: information visit: Lane closures are occuring in the work zone from 10:30 p.m. to 5:30 a.m. Sunday through Thursday. Entrance and exit ramps will be closed as needed. 95Express.com Upcoming Project Milestones (weather permitting): • Winter 2016/2017: Ongoing milling and resurfacing of I-95 northbound from Broward Boulevard to Oakland Park Boulevard • Winter 2016/2017: Broward Boulevard construction anticipated to be completed • Early 2017: Sound wall work will begin For around-the-clock, real time, I-95 traffic information, call 511.
    [Show full text]
  • Crescent Corridor Update
    Crescent Corridor Update December 21st, 2016 US DOT Talking Freight Norfolk Southern Government Relations Norfolk Southern’s Network • NS operates approximately 20,000 route miles throughout 22 states and the District of Columbia • Engaged in the rail transportation of raw materials, intermediate products, and finished goods • Operates the most extensive intermodal network in the East and is a major transporter of coal and industrial products. • NYSE: NSC 2 NS Intermodal Network Growth Majority of growth has been over Corridors • Norfolk Southern has A Network of Key Corridors employed a “Corridor Albany Boston Detroit Strategy” focusing on four Bethlehem Chicago New York/New Jersey Harrisburg Philadelphia key principles: Columbus Greencastle • Market access Cincinnati • Length of haul Charlotte Memphis • Asset utilization Atlanta Birmingham • Productivity Shreveport New Orleans What is an Intermodal Facility? Intermodal Facility –A rail terminal for transferring freight from one transportation mode to another, either from truck‐to‐rail or rail‐to‐truck for the Crescent Corridor, without the handling of the freight itself when changing modes. NS’ Intermodal Network Norfolk Southern System Intermodal Terminal(s) Market Expansions thru 2010 Market Expansions thru 2012 IM Port Terminal TCS Terminals Total U.S. Intermodal Units (Originated Units) 16,000,000 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 *2016 is Jan-Nov annualized Source: AAR Crescent Corridor Pre-Project Influences • Norfolk Southern – Continued cooperation with long-haul truck carriers – Increase in freight trade between Northeast and South – Infrastructure enhancements for speed and capacity • Key Drivers for Private, Local, State, and Federal Partners – Increased highway congestion and vehicular emissions – Growing vehicle travel miles and congestion on I-81, I- 40, I-85, I-20, and I-76.
    [Show full text]