DOCSLIB.ORG

Readingsample

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Readingsample Turcologica 37,1 Salar: A Study in Inner Asian Language Contact Processes Part I: Phonology Bearbeitet von Arienne M Dwyer 1. Auflage 2007. Taschenbuch. XXVI, 336 S. Paperback ISBN 978 3 447 04091 4 Format (B x L): 17 x 24 cm Weitere Fachgebiete > Literatur, Sprache > Angewandte Sprachwissenschaft > Sprachkontaktforschung Zu Inhaltsverzeichnis schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de ist spezialisiert auf Fachbücher, insbesondere Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft. Im Sortiment finden Sie alle Medien (Bücher, Zeitschriften, CDs, eBooks, etc.) aller Verlage. Ergänzt wird das Programm durch Services wie Neuerscheinungsdienst oder Zusammenstellungen von Büchern zu Sonderpreisen. Der Shop führt mehr als 8 Millionen Produkte. Arienne M. Dwyer Salar: A Study in Inner Asian Language Contact Processes Part I: Phonology 2007 Harrassowitz Verlag · Wiesbaden ISSN 01774743 ISBN 978-344704091-4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Photos and Figures .................................................................................... ix Abbreviations ............................................................................................ xii Preface....................................................................................................... xvii On Transcription and Transliteration ........................................................ xix 1 Cultural History.............................................................................. 1 1.1 Salar Origins............................................................................ 1 1.1.1 The Legend.............................................................................. 1 1.1.2 Early historical References to the Salars in China ................... 3 1.1.3 The Central Asian Connection................................................. 6 1.1.4 Preconditions to Ethnogenesis ................................................. 8 1.2 Cultural Contact and ethnoreligious Identity ........................... 9 1.2.1 Tibetan and Muslim-Chinese Contact...................................... 11 1.2.2 Faith and Control ..................................................................... 14 1.3 Summary .................................................................................. 25 2 Linguistic History ........................................................................... 26 2.1 The Turkic Language Family: Locus and Chronology ............ 26 2.2 Classification of the Turkic Family.......................................... 29 2.3 The Classification of Salar....................................................... 32 2.4 Western Turkic Tendencies, real and imagined....................... 35 2.4.1 Phonetic Elements.................................................................... 35 2.4.2 Oghuz lexical Elements ........................................................... 40 2.4.3 Salar and Turkmen: a closer Relationship?.............................. 44 2.5 Archaisms in Salar ................................................................... 47 2.5.1 Morphosyntactic Archaisms.................................................... 47 2.5.2 Lexical Archaisms.................................................................... 49 2.6 South Siberian and marginal Kïpchak Turkic Elements .......... 52 2.7 Non-Uyghur Elements ............................................................. 56 2.7.1 Phonological Elements............................................................. 57 2.7.2 Lexical Elements...................................................................... 57 2.7.3 Morphological Elements .......................................................... 60 2.8 Southeastern Features.............................................................. 61 2.8.1 Sound System........................................................................... 61 2.8.2 Morphosyntactic Elements....................................................... 61 vi Table of Contents 2.9 Idiosyncratic Features.............................................................. 62 2.10 Summary of Salar Features by Type ................................................ 66 3 Documentation and Variation ....................................................... 69 3.1 Explorers and Linguists: previous Studies............................... 69 3.2 Data Basis................................................................................ 73 3.3 Forms of vocalized Salar.......................................................... 74 3.4 Varieties and Variation ............................................................ 77 3.4.1 Western Salar: the Ili Dialect ................................................... 79 3.4.2 Eastern Salar Vernaculars........................................................ 81 3.4.3 Factors in Dialect Variation ..................................................... 87 3.5 Language Status....................................................................... 90 3.5.1 Speakers and Multilingualism.................................................. 90 3.5.2 Orthography, Extant Texts....................................................... 91 3.5.3 Language Endangerment.......................................................... 92 4 The Sound System: an Overview................................................... 94 4.1 Consonants............................................................................... 94 4.1.1 Surface consonantal Inventory................................................. 94 4.1.2 Underlying consonantal Inventory........................................... 96 4.1.3 Manner ..................................................................................... 96 4.1.4 Voicing and Aspiration............................................................ 98 4.1.5 Place ......................................................................................... 108 4.2 Vowels ..................................................................................... 119 4.2.1 Surface vowel Inventory .......................................................... 120 4.2.2 Vowel Phonemes...................................................................... 121 4.2.3 Vowel Quality.......................................................................... 122 4.2.4 Diphthongs............................................................................... 132 4.2.5 Long Vowels............................................................................ 136 5 Syllable Structure and Prosody..................................................... 139 5.1 Framework ............................................................................... 139 5.2 Syllable Types.......................................................................... 139 5.3 CVC syllables and vowel Epenthesis....................................... 146 5.3.1 Epenthesis within the Syllable (1)............................................ 146 5.3.2 Epenthesis within the Syllable (2)............................................ 147 5.3.3 Epenthesis across Syllables...................................................... 149 5.3.4 Sonority, Syllable Weight and Epenthesis............................... 150 5.4 Prosodic Minimality and Glide Epenthesis.............................. 151 5.5 Syllable Strengthening............................................................. 153 Table of Contents vii 5.6 Summary of Strategies for achieving preferred Syllable Structure .................................................................... 154 5.7 Prosodic Structure.................................................................... 155 5.7.1 Stress Assignment in Salar....................................................... 155 5.7.2 Morpheme-based Stress Assignment ....................................... 155 5.7.2.1 Stress-attracting Morphemes.................................................... 155 5.7.2.2 Unstressed Morphemes............................................................ 156 5.7.3 Syllable-based Stress Assignment............................................ 157 5.7.4 Non-final Stress........................................................................ 157 5.7.5 Prosody-based Stress Assignment........................................... 159 5.8 Unstressed Suffixes.................................................................. 160 6 Major phonological Processes ....................................................... 163 6.1 Syllabification Processes.......................................................... 163 6.1.1 Glottal Prothesis....................................................................... 163 6.1.2 Initial [v]-Prothesis .................................................................. 164 6.1.3 On-glide Prothesis.................................................................... 164 6.1.4 Nasal Deletion; Vowel Nasalization ........................................ 165 6.1.5 Liquid Deletion........................................................................ 166 6.1.6 Consonant Epenthesis .............................................................. 168 6.1.7 Co-occurrence Restrictions on Salar Codae............................. 169 6.2 Harmonic Assimilation Processes............................................ 171 6.2.1 Vowel Harmony....................................................................... 171 6.3 Regular Disharmony ................................................................ 173 6.3.1 Vowel Derounding................................................................... 174 6.3.2 Vowel Laxing..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter One Phonetic Change
    CHAPTERONE PHONETICCHANGE The investigation of the nature and the types of changes that affect the sounds of a language is the most highly developed area of the study of language change. The term sound change is used to refer, in the broadest sense, to alterations in the phonetic shape of segments and suprasegmental features that result from the operation of phonological process es. The pho- netic makeup of given morphemes or words or sets of morphemes or words also may undergo change as a by-product of alterations in the grammatical patterns of a language. Sound change is used generally to refer only to those phonetic changes that affect all occurrences of a given sound or class of sounds (like the class of voiceless stops) under specifiable phonetic conditions . It is important to distinguish between the use of the term sound change as it refers tophonetic process es in a historical context , on the one hand, and as it refers to phonetic corre- spondences on the other. By phonetic process es we refer to the replacement of a sound or a sequenceof sounds presenting some articulatory difficulty by another sound or sequence lacking that difficulty . A phonetic correspondence can be said to exist between a sound at one point in the history of a language and the sound that is its direct descendent at any subsequent point in the history of that language. A phonetic correspondence often reflects the results of several phonetic process es that have affected a segment serially . Although phonetic process es are synchronic phenomena, they often have diachronic consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • (1'9'6'8'""159-83 and in Later Publica- (1972 539
    FINAL WEAKENING AND RELATED PHENOMENA1 Hans Henrich Hock University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1: Final devoicing (FD) 1.1. In generative phonology, it is a generally accepted doctrine that, since word-final devoicing (WFD) is a very common and natural phenomenon, the ob- verse phenomenon, namely word-final voicin~ should not be found in natural language. Compare for instance Postal 1968 184 ('in the context----'~ the rules always devoice rather than voice'), Stampe 1969 443-5 (final devoicing comes about as the result of a failure t~ suppress the (innate) process of final devoicing), Vennemann 1972 240-1 (final voicing, defined as a process increasing the complexity of affected segment~ 'does not occur.')o 1.2 One of the standard examples for WFD is that of German, cf. Bund Bunde [bUnt] [bUndeJ. However Vennemann (1'9'6'8'""159-83 and in later publica- tions) and, following him, Hooper (1972 539) and Hyman (1975 142) have convincingly demonstrated that in Ger- man, this process applies not only word-finally, but also syllable-finally, as in radle [ra·t$le]3 'go by bike' (in some varieties of German). The standard view thus must be modified so as to recognize at least one other process, namely syllable-final devoicing (SFD). (For a different eA""Planation of this phenomenon compare section 2.3 below.) 2· Final voicing (or tenseness neutralization) 2 1 A more important argument against the stan- dard view, however, is that, as anyone with any train- ing in Indo-European linguistics can readily tell, there is at least one 5roup, namely Italic, where there is evidence for the allegedly impossible final voicing, cf PIE *siyet > OLat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phonemic − Syllabic Comparisons of Standard Malay and Palembang Malay Using a Historical Linguistic Perspective
    Passage2013, 1(2), 35-44 The Phonemic − Syllabic Comparisons of Standard Malay and Palembang Malay Using a Historical Linguistic Perspective By: Novita Arsillah English Language and Literature Program (E-mail: [email protected] / mobile: +6281312203723) ABSTRACT This study is a historical linguistic investigation entitled The Phonemic − Syllabic Comparisons of Standard Malay and Palembang Malay Using a Historical Linguistic Perspective which aims to explore the types of sound changes found in Palembang Malay. The investigation uses a historical linguistic comparative method to compare the phonemic and syllabic changes between an ancestral language Standard Malay and its decent language Palembang Malay. Standard Malay refers to the Wilkinson dictionary in 1904. The participants of this study are seven native speakers of Palembang Malay whose ages range from 20 to 40 years old. The data were collected from the voices of the participants that were recorded along group conversations and interviews. This study applies the theoretical framework of sound changes which proposed by Terry Crowley in 1997 and Lily Campbell in 1999. The findings show that there are nine types of sound changes that were found as the results, namely assimilation (42.35%), lenition (20%), sound addition (3.53%), metathesis (1.18%), dissimilation (1.76%), abnormal sound changes (3.53%), split (13.53%), vowel rising (10.59%), and monophthongisation (3.53%). Keywords: Historical linguistics, standard Malay, Palembang Malay, comparative method, sound change, phoneme, syllable. 35 Novita Arsillah The Phonemic − Syllabic Comparisons of Standard Malay and Palembang Malay Using a Historical Linguistic Perspective INTRODUCTION spelling system in this study since it is considered to be the first Malay spelling This study classifies into the system that is used widely in Malaya, field of historical linguistics that Singapore, and Brunei (Omar, 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Using Coarticulation Rules in Automatic Phonetic Transcription
    Using Coarticulation Rules in Automatic Phonetic Transcription Arlindo Veiga 1, Sara Candeias 1, Luís Sá 1,2 , Fernando Perdigão 1,2 1 Instituto de Telecomunicações, Pólo de Coimbra 2 Universidade de Coimbra – DEEC, Pólo II, P-3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal {aveiga, saracandeias, luis, fp}@co.it.pt Abstract. Phonetic transcription of continuous speech databases is an important and necessary task for speech synthesis and recognition. Manual transcription requires well-trained experts and is time-consuming. So, it becomes more and more usual to implement automatic or semi-automatic transcription procedures. However, it is well known that pronunciation variations and coarticulation phenomena involve serious problems for automatic transcribers. This paper describes an approach to automatically label a continuous speech database at phonetic level using orthographic transcription (word level) and a set of pre- built acoustic models to deal with pronunciation variations. These pronunciation variations arise from coarticulation phenomena. Common intra- word and trans-word coarticulation phenomena will be described as well. Keywords: Automatic phonetic transcription, Coarticulation, Pronunciation variation 1 Introduction Careful manual transcription of a speech database produces best results comparing to automatic transcriptions. However, it requires a lot of resources and is usually a forbidden option to transcribe a large corpus. In [1] the authors refer more than one hundred times real-time to do manual transcriptions. Automatic or semi-automatic methods are often used to perform this task with accuracies that tend to manual transcriptions after several iterations. However, particularly in continuous speech, multi-pronunciations and coarticulation must be considered in the automatic transcriptions. Most of the work in this area, use forced alignment to deal with multi- pronunciation.
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisition of English /S/-Clusters by Brazilian Portuguese Speakers Carolyn June Baker Florida International University
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons MA in Linguistics Final Projects College of Arts, Sciences & Education 4-12-2017 Acquisition of English /S/-Clusters by Brazilian Portuguese Speakers Carolyn June Baker Florida International University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/linguistics_ma Part of the Linguistics Commons Recommended Citation Baker, Carolyn June, "Acquisition of English /S/-Clusters by Brazilian Portuguese Speakers" (2017). MA in Linguistics Final Projects. 1. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/linguistics_ma/1 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts, Sciences & Education at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in MA in Linguistics Final Projects by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida ACQUISITION OF ENGLISH /S/-CLUSTERS BY BRAZILIAN PORTUGUESE SPEAKERS A master’s project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ART in LINGUISTICS by Carolyn June Baker 2017 FIU LINGUISTICS PROGRAM MA PROJECT FINAL SUBMISSION To: Director, Linguistics Program College of Arts, Sciences and Education This MA Project, written by Carolyn June Baker, and entitled Acquisition of English /s/-clusters by Brazilian Portuguese Speakers, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this MA Project and recommend that it be approved. _______________________________________ Virginia C. Mueller Gathercole _______________________________________ Feryal Yavaş _______________________________________ Mehmet Yavaş, Major Professor Date of Defense: April 12, 2017 The MA Project of Carolyn June Baker is approved. _________________________________________ Prof. Virginia C.
    [Show full text]
  • Ling 150, Historical Linguistics Moore, Winter 2013 Types of Sound Change Lenition
    Ling 150, Historical Linguistics Moore, Winter 2013 Types of Sound Change Lenition (1) Stronger Weaker voiced voiceless (sometimes) voiceless voiced (sometimes) stops fricatives obstruents sonorants consonants semivowels oral glottal front/back central (2) Lentition: Stronger > Weaker Kara (New Ireland) *bulan > fulan ‘moon’ *tapine > tefin ‘woman’ *punti > fut ‘banana’ (3) Rhotacism: C > r Latin *ami:kosum > ami:korum ‘of friends’ *genesis > generis ‘of the type’ Sound Loss (4) Aphaeresis: initial consonant deletion Angkamuthi (Cape York) *maji > aji ‘food’ *nani > ani ‘ground’ *wapun > apun ‘head’ (5) Apocope: final vowel loss S.E. Ambrym (Vanutu) *utu > ut ‘lice’ *aŋo > aŋ ‘fly’ *asue > asu ‘rat’ *tohu > toh ‘sugarcane’ Ling 150, Historical Linguistics Moore, Winter 2013 (6) Syncope: medial vowel loss Lenakel (Vanutu) *namatana > nɨmrɨn ‘his/her eye’ (note other changes) *nalimana > nelmɨn ‘his/her hand’ *masa > mha ‘low tide’ (7) Cluster reduction: CC >C English Melanesian Pidgin dɪstɹɪkt > distrik ‘district’ poʊst > pos ‘post’ peɩnt > pen ‘paint’ tæŋk > taŋ ‘tank’ (8) Haplology: syllable loss (conditioned by adjacent similar syllable) laɩbɹəɹi > laɩbɹi ‘library’ Anglaland > England Sound Addition (9) Excrescence: consonant addition *æmtig > ɛmpti ‘empty’ *θymle > θɪmbl ‘thimble’ (10) Epenthtesis: vowel addition English Tok Pisin blæk > bilak ‘black’ blu: > bulu ‘blue’ sɪks > sikis ‘six’ (11) Prothesis: initial sound addition Moru (Papua New Guinea) *api > lahi ‘fire’ *asan > lada ‘gills’ *au > lau ‘I, me’ Ling 150, Historical Linguistics Moore, Spring 2011 Metathesis Sounds switch places. (12) *brid > *bird > bɚd æsk > æks (13) Tagalog Ilokano taŋis : sa:ŋit ‘cry’ tubus : subut ‘redeem’ tigis : si:git ‘decant’ tamis : samqit ‘sweet’ Fusion Two sounds become one, bearing features of both original sounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Contrast and Post-Velar Fronting in Russian*
    [To appear in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory] Contrast and Post-Velar Fronting in Russian* Jaye Padgett - University of California, Santa Cruz There is a well-known rule of Russian whereby /i/ is said to be realized as [Y] after non-palatalized consonants. Somewhat less well-known is another allophonic rule of Russian whereby only [i], and not [Y], can follow velars within a morphological word. This latter rule came about due to a sound change in East Slavic called post- velar fronting here: kY > kji (and similarly for the other velars). This paper examines this sound change in depth, and argues that it can be adequately explained only by appeal to the functional notions of perceptual distinctiveness of contrast and neutralization avoidance. Further, these notions crucially require a systemic approach to phonology, in which the wellformedness of any form must be evaluated with reference to the larger system of contrasts it enters into. These notions are formalized in a modified version of Dispersion Theory (Flemming 1995a), a systemic theory that incorporates these functional notions into Optimality Theory (Prince and Smolensky 1993). 1. Introduction It is well known that Russian consonants contrast in palatalization. Also well known are certain allophonic rules connected to this palatalization contrast. One such rule requires that the phoneme /i/ be realized as high central unrounded [Y] after non-palatalized consonants, and [i] elsewhere, e.g., bjitj 'to beat' from /bjitj/ versus bYtj 'to be' from /bitj/. Another concerns velar consonants, which are more limited in their ability to contrast in palatalization: within words, velars can be followed only by [i] and not by [Y], e.g., xjitrYj 'clever' from /xitrij/, cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Syllable Structure of Ukrainian. an Ot Perspective
    Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 43(2), 2007, pp. 23–41 © School of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland doi:10.2478/v10010-007-0012-5 SYLLABLE STRUCTURE OF UKRAINIAN. AN OT PERSPECTIVE BARTŁOMIEJ CZAPLICKI Warsaw University [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper aims at presenting an OT account of the basic syllable structure of Ukrainian. Among the specifically Ukrainian syllable-driven processes that are considered are onset maximisation, prothesis, voice assimilation, as well as the behaviour of clusters of obstruents agreeing and dis- agreeing in voicing, sonority plateaus and extrasyllabic sonorants. Optimality Theory is shown to successfully handle dialectal variation in the application of prothesis, as well as the transparency effects in voice assimilation. KEYWORDS : Phonology; syllable; Ukrainian; prothesis; extrasyllabicity. 1. Background * The data are analysed in the Optimality Theory (OT henceforth) framework as outlined in Prince and Smolensky (1993), McCarthy and Prince (1993a), McCarthy and Prince (1993b) and others. This paper is structured as follows. We set out by providing theo- retical background and basic facts about syllable structure in Ukrainian. Next, prothesis is shown not to operate any longer in Standard Ukrainian (Section 2.1), the process is still productive in certain dialects (Section 2.2). The factorial typology shown by the two dialects is expressed in OT as the reranking of two universal constraints. In Section 3.1, we deal with obstruent clusters. Clusters of obstruents that disagree in voicing de- serve a separate account in Section 3.2. Section 4.1 addresses the issue of the syllabifi- cation of consonantal sonorants. More specifically, sonority plateaus are investigated in Section 4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Welsh Mutation and Strict Modularity © Õìth August Óþõé Florian Breit
    §Z f§u± WELSHMUTATIONANDSTRICTMODULARITY WELSHMUTATION & STRICTMODULARITY Florian Breit esis submitted in partial fullment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics Department of Linguistics University College London Õìth August óþÕÉ Florian Breit: Welsh Mutation and Strict Modularity © Õìth August óþÕÉ Florian Breit £§h£Z «¶£u§ê«§: John Harris «¶f«oZ§í «¶£u§ê«§: Andrew Nevins is document was typeset using the typographical look-and-feel classicthesis Minion Pro (version ¦.ó) for LYX by André Miede. e type faces used are by Robert Slimbach and Euler by Hermann Zapf. For the greater glory of God, and in memory of Uncle Peter, who taught me the importance of love, the meaning of sorrow, and the struggles of happiness. Declaration I, Florian Breit, conrm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I conrm that this has been indicated in the thesis. London, Õìth August óþÕÉ ............................. Florian Breit vii Abstract e generative view of the language faculty is premised on the modularity of mind. In its most restrictive form, strict modularity, this predicts that phonological processes cannot be sensitive to syntactic information and vice versa. Initial Consonant Mutation in languages such as Welsh appear to falsify the strict modularity hypothesis in relation to the morphosyn- tax–phonology interface. is is because mutation involves the triggering of a phonologically regular process in a morphosyntactically determined environment. Consider the Welsh data in (Õ): (Õ) /kaT/ ‘cat’ (a) [i XaT] ‘her cat’ (b) [i kaT] ‘his cat’ e plosive–fricative alternation in (Õ) cannot be purely phonological in nature, because the phonological environment in (Õa) and (Õb) is identical.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Iraqi and Najdi Arabic Word-Initial and Word
    A Comparative Study of Iraqi and Najdi Arabic Word-initial and Word-final Consonant Cluster Saja Albuarabi ([email protected]) & Hanyong Park ([email protected]) Department of Linguistics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Midphon 24, UW-Milwaukee, WI, October 5, 2019 Main Point Figure 3. Mean proportions (%) of word-initial consonant cluster Our experimental study using nonwords reveals productions with prothesis and epenthesis by Najdi speakers. 100% phonological constraints on CCs in Iraqi and Najdi 80% Arabic, which may not be apparent in descriptive 60% studies examining real words. 40% 20% Research Question 0% N+F F+N S+N L+F N+S How will Iraqi and Najdi Arabic speakers produce Prothesis Epenthesis word-initial and word-final consonant clusters (CCs) in • Najdi speakers: mostly epenthesis. nonwords? Figure 4. Mean proportions (%) of word-final consonant cluster Analysis: Accurate CC production (%) & Error analysis productions with epenthesis by Iraqi and Najdi speakers. Background (Epenthesis or prothesis?) for the CCs with 50% or 100% higher errors. 80% Iraqi Arabic: CC is not allowed in the southern 60% dialects of Iraqi Arabic (Albazi, 2006; Blanc, 1964; Results 40% Erwin, 1969). All descriptive studies. 20% Figure 1. Mean correct production (%) of word-initial and Najdi Arabic: Word-initial CC is allowed in specific word-finial consonant clusters by Iraqi and Najdi speakers. 0% N+L L+N F+N N+F G+L F+S S+N 1 environments: (S+F, N, L), (F+N, L), (N+G), & (L+G) 100% Iraqi Epenthesis Najdi Epenthesis word-initial CC word-final CC 80% (Alghmaiz, 2013); Word-final CC is allowed in falling 61% 60% sonority clusters regardless of sonority steps • Both Iraqi and Najdi speakers had difficulty for 40% 24% 26% similar word-final CC types.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonological Typology OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 24/3/2016, Spi
    OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 24/3/2016, SPi Phonological Typology OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 24/3/2016, SPi OXFORD SURVEYS IN PHONOLOGY AND PHONETICS GENERAL EDITOR: Bert Vaux, University of Cambridge This series aims to provide a balanced account of leading approaches to and debates in the most active and productive topics in phonology and phonetics. Each volume examines current and past treatments of a specific topic and offers a reasoned account of the theories and methods that lead to the best account for the facts. The books provide students and practitioners of phonology, phonetics, and related fields with a valuable source of instruction and reference, set within the context of wider developments in the field, and where relevant in linguistics and cognitive science more generally. PUBLISHED Phonological Typology Matthew K. Gordon IN PREPARATION The Syllable Juliette Blevins The Phonetics–Phonology Interface Abigail C. Cohn and Marie Huffman Intonation Sónia Frota and Carlos Gussenhoven OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 24/3/2016, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OXDP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Matthew K. Gordon The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in Impression: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 BASIC THEORETICAL ELEMENTS and THEIR
    Chapter 3: Basic elements 136 The perceptual salience of a segment – or its degree of confusability with Chapter 3 zero – is a function of the quantity and quality of the auditory cues that signal its BASIC THEORETICAL ELEMENTS presence in the speech stream. The best cues to consonants, apart from those present in the consonants themselves, are found in neighboring vowels, especially in the CV AND THEIR PERCEPTUAL MOTIVATIONS transition. It is the desirability for consonants to benefit from these vocalic cues that generalization 1 expresses. But cues may also come from other sources, and the perceptibility of a consonant without the support of an adjacent or following vowel The preceding chapter identified a number of empirical generalizations, which depends on these non-(pre)vocalic cues. Generalizations 2-6 identify factors that condition the application of consonant deletion, vowel epenthesis, and vowel negatively affect these cues, and consequently enhance the desirability of an adjacent deletion. These output generalizations are summarized below. vowel in order to meet the principle in (1). Generalization 1: Consonants want to be adjacent to a vowel, and preferably I assume that consonant deletion and vowel epenthesis are motivated by the followed by a vowel. principle of perceptual salience; they apply when a consonant lacks perceptual salience and becomes more easily confusable with nothing, that is when the cues that Generalization 2: Stops want to be adjacent to a vowel, and preferably followed permit a listener to detect its presence are diminished. Deletion removes such by a vowel. deficient segments, epenthesis provides them with the needed additional salience.
    [Show full text]