DOCSLIB.ORG

The Effects on Pollinators, Predators, Herbivores, and Floral Communities AD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Effects on Pollinators, Predators, Herbivores, and Floral Communities AD Wildflower plantings in commercial agroecosystems: The effects on pollinators, predators, herbivores, and floral communities A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Eric Gordon Middleton IN PARTIAL FULLFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Ian V. MacRae and George E. Heimpel, Advisors August 2020 © Eric Gordon Middleton 2020 Acknowledgements There are many people who helped in large and small ways during my time in graduate school that deserve recognition. While the road to this dissertation has not always been a smooth one, the support of colleagues, friends, and family have made it not only possible, but thoroughly enjoyable. For that, I am very grateful. I would first like to thank my advisors Dr. Ian MacRae and Dr. George Heimpel for their mentorship and guidance, and for trusting me with the ownership of my project. Committee members Dr. Dan Cariveau and Dr. Elizabeth Borer provided valuable advice and feedback throughout my graduate career. Outside of my committee, Dr. Sujaya Rao helped me gain experience as a teacher and a leader, and has always been willing to offer counsel and advice. I would also like to thank Dr. Christopher Philips for bringing me on as a student in the first place and setting me on my course of study. This work would not have been possible without funding and support from numerous sources. I thank NRC-SARE and AREA II Potato Growers Association for providing operational funds, and the University of Minnesota’s Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship, the MGK Fellowship, the Bell Museum’s Dayton Fellowship, and the MnDRIVE Global Food Ventures program for contributing to my stipend. Just as important were all of the students and staff who contributed to my project and to my development as a scientist. Thank you Lindsey Christianson, Grace Sward, and Sydney Glass for assistance in the lab and field. Thank you to all of the members of Frenatae for providing a welcoming community. And thank you to the undergraduate workers Noah Linck, Joe Nelson, Gus Fedje-Johnson, Lily Briggs, Erik Lucas, Lexie i Ogdahl, Caroline Hofmeister, Eli Kleinschmidt, Bailey Brandel, and Samantha Meyers for all of your hard work and dedication. Lastly, I have to thank my parents John and Marge for their constant support, for reading through drafts of papers, and for providing feedback whenever I needed it. I am truly fortunate to have such a supportive family, who exposed me to critically thinking and the wonder of nature from an early age. And finally, thank you to my partner Elissa, who inspires me to be a better scientist and always encourages me to stop and look at the bugs. ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements...............................................................................................................i Table of Contents................................................................................................................iii List of Tables.....................................................................................................................vii List of Figures.....................................................................................................................ix Voucher Specimens..........................................................................................................xiii Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 Declines in Insect Abundance and Ecosystem Services....................................1 1.2 Methods to Preserve Insects and Services.........................................................3 1.3 Floral Plantings..................................................................................................5 1.4 Scope of Dissertation.........................................................................................7 Chapter 2: Floral community and herbivores: Evaluating a commercially available floral seed mixture when established on-farm 2.1 Overview............................................................................................................8 2.2 Introduction........................................................................................................9 2.3 Materials and Methods 2.3.1 Experimental Design.........................................................................12 2.3.2 Floral Sampling.................................................................................14 2.3.3 Herbivore Sampling..........................................................................16 2.4 Results 2.4.1 Floral Communities..........................................................................17 2.4.2 Herbivores.........................................................................................18 2.5 Discussion iii 2.5.1 Floral Establishment.........................................................................19 2.5.2 Herbivores.........................................................................................23 2.6 Conclusions......................................................................................................25 2.7 Acknowledgements..........................................................................................25 2.8 Figures and Tables...........................................................................................27 Chapter 3: Floral plantings in large-scale commercial agroecosystems support both pollinators and arthropod predators 3.1 Overview..........................................................................................................34 3.2 Introduction......................................................................................................35 3.3 Materials and Methods 3.3.1 Experimental Design.........................................................................38 3.3.2 Floral Sampling.................................................................................39 3.3.3 Pollinator Sampling..........................................................................40 3.3.4 Predator Sampling.............................................................................41 3.3.5: Data Analysis…...............................................................................41 3.4 Results 3.4.1 Pollinators and Predators in Margins................................................43 3.4.2 Predators and Predators in Crops…..................................................44 3.5 Discussion 3.5.1 Pollinators.........................................................................................45 3.5.2 Predators...........................................................................................48 3.6 Conclusions......................................................................................................50 3.7 Acknowledgements..........................................................................................50 iv 3.8 Figures and Tables...........................................................................................52 Chapter 4: Wildflower plantings in commercial agroecosystems promote generalist predators of Colorado potato beetle 4.1 Overview..........................................................................................................64 4.2 Introduction......................................................................................................64 4.3 Materials and Methods 4.3.1 Experimental Design.........................................................................68 4.3.2 Insect Sampling.................................................................................69 4.3.3 Measuring Predation.........................................................................71 4.3.4 Overwintering Colorado potato beetle..............................................72 4.4 Results 4.4.1 Colorado potato beetle predators......................................................73 4.4.2 Sentinel Prey Removal......................................................................74 4.4.3 Colorado potato beetle abundance....................................................74 4.4.4 Sentinel potato plants........................................................................75 4.5 Discussion 4.5.1 Do floral plantings affect the abundance of known predators of CPB? .........................................................................................................75 4.5.2 Do floral plantings increase predation of CPB eggs masses?...........78 4.5.3 How do floral plantings influence the abundance of CPB within adjacent potato fields? ...............................................................................79 4.5.4 Do floral plantings provide improved overwintering habitat or refuge for CPB? ....................................................................................................80 v 4.6 Conclusions......................................................................................................81 4.7 Acknowledgements..........................................................................................81 4.8 Figures and Tables...........................................................................................83 Literature Cited...............................................................................................................90 Appendix 1......................................................................................................................101 Appendix 2......................................................................................................................103 Appendix 3......................................................................................................................104
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Heteroptera, Reduviidae, Phymatinae)1
    © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at The Ambush Bugs of China: Taxonomic Knowledge and Distribution Patterns (Heteroptera, Reduviidae, Phymatinae)1 J. CUI, W. CAI & W. RABITSCH Abstract: Forty-five species of Chinese ambush bugs belonging to three tribes, Phymatini, Carcinocori- ni, and Macrocephalini, are listed and keyed. Distribution maps of all species and habitus illustrations of a representative species of each of the nine genera, Agdistocoris, Amblythyreus, Carcinochelis, Carcino- coris, Chelocoris, Cnizocoris, Diurocoris, Glossopelta, and Phymata, are provided. The biology and rele- vance of this group in mountainous forest ecosystems are briefly discussed. Key words: Ambush bugs, China, distribution, Phymatinae, Reduviidae, taxonomy. Introduction species are recognized in Chelocoris, two in Carcinocoris, and one in Carcinochelis. In Most ambush bugs are small or mid-sized Macrocephalini, only one species is known insects which prefer to stay in flowers or on in each of two genera, Diurocoris and Agdis- small twigs of shrubs, where they lurk for tocoris; and the genera, Glossopelta, Cnizo- prey. The most striking character is the rap- coris, and Amblythyreus include 6, 14, and 11 torial, chelate or mantid-like forelegs, species, respectively. In Phymatini, the which are only missing in the Ethiopian genus Phymata includes two species from Themonocoris, probably the ancestral genus China. (and subfamily), with four known species, however, their phylogenetic position is still a matter of discussion (e.g. CARAYON et al. Material and Methods 1958; VAN DOESBURG 2004). Distribution of the species was compiled To date, approximately 290 species have from the literature, but some data were ex- been described from all over the world, with cluded either because it was not possible to the exception of Australia, New Zealand, trace the position of the localities in China and the Pacific islands.
    [Show full text]
  • A Stable Phylogenomic Classification of Travunioidea (Arachnida, Opiliones, Laniatores) Based on Sequence Capture of Ultraconserved Elements
    A stable phylogenomic classification of Travunioidea (Arachnida, Opiliones, Laniatores) based on sequence capture of ultraconserved elements The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Derkarabetian, Shahan, James Starrett, Nobuo Tsurusaki, Darrell Ubick, Stephanie Castillo, and Marshal Hedin. 2018. “A stable phylogenomic classification of Travunioidea (Arachnida, Opiliones, Laniatores) based on sequence capture of ultraconserved elements.” ZooKeys (760): 1-36. doi:10.3897/zookeys.760.24937. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.760.24937. Published Version doi:10.3897/zookeys.760.24937 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:37298544 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 760: 1–36 (2018) A stable phylogenomic classification of Travunioidea... 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.760.24937 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A stable phylogenomic classification of Travunioidea (Arachnida, Opiliones, Laniatores) based on sequence capture of ultraconserved elements Shahan Derkarabetian1,2,7 , James Starrett3, Nobuo Tsurusaki4, Darrell Ubick5, Stephanie Castillo6, Marshal Hedin1 1 Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomically Modern Carboniferous Harvestmen Demonstrate Early Cladogenesis and Stasis in Opiliones
    ARTICLE Received 14 Feb 2011 | Accepted 27 Jul 2011 | Published 23 Aug 2011 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1458 Anatomically modern Carboniferous harvestmen demonstrate early cladogenesis and stasis in Opiliones Russell J. Garwood1, Jason A. Dunlop2, Gonzalo Giribet3 & Mark D. Sutton1 Harvestmen, the third most-diverse arachnid order, are an ancient group found on all continental landmasses, except Antarctica. However, a terrestrial mode of life and leathery, poorly mineralized exoskeleton makes preservation unlikely, and their fossil record is limited. The few Palaeozoic species discovered to date appear surprisingly modern, but are too poorly preserved to allow unequivocal taxonomic placement. Here, we use high-resolution X-ray micro-tomography to describe two new harvestmen from the Carboniferous (~305 Myr) of France. The resulting computer models allow the first phylogenetic analysis of any Palaeozoic Opiliones, explicitly resolving both specimens as members of different extant lineages, and providing corroboration for molecular estimates of an early Palaeozoic radiation within the order. Furthermore, remarkable similarities between these fossils and extant harvestmen implies extensive morphological stasis in the order. Compared with other arachnids—and terrestrial arthropods generally—harvestmen are amongst the first groups to evolve fully modern body plans. 1 Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK. 2 Museum für Naturkunde at the Humboldt University Berlin, D-10115 Berlin, Germany. 3 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to R.J.G. (email: [email protected]) and for phylogenetic analysis, G.G. (email: [email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • Geological History and Phylogeny of Chelicerata
    Arthropod Structure & Development 39 (2010) 124–142 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Arthropod Structure & Development journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/asd Review Article Geological history and phylogeny of Chelicerata Jason A. Dunlop* Museum fu¨r Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiversity at the Humboldt University Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany article info abstract Article history: Chelicerata probably appeared during the Cambrian period. Their precise origins remain unclear, but may Received 1 December 2009 lie among the so-called great appendage arthropods. By the late Cambrian there is evidence for both Accepted 13 January 2010 Pycnogonida and Euchelicerata. Relationships between the principal euchelicerate lineages are unre- solved, but Xiphosura, Eurypterida and Chasmataspidida (the last two extinct), are all known as body Keywords: fossils from the Ordovician. The fourth group, Arachnida, was found monophyletic in most recent studies. Arachnida Arachnids are known unequivocally from the Silurian (a putative Ordovician mite remains controversial), Fossil record and the balance of evidence favours a common, terrestrial ancestor. Recent work recognises four prin- Phylogeny Evolutionary tree cipal arachnid clades: Stethostomata, Haplocnemata, Acaromorpha and Pantetrapulmonata, of which the pantetrapulmonates (spiders and their relatives) are probably the most robust grouping. Stethostomata includes Scorpiones (Silurian–Recent) and Opiliones (Devonian–Recent), while
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Entomologist the Grea T Lakes E N Omo L O G Is T Published by the Michigan Entomological Society Vol
    The Great Lakes Entomologist THE GREA Published by the Michigan Entomological Society Vol. 45, Nos. 3 & 4 Fall/Winter 2012 Volume 45 Nos. 3 & 4 ISSN 0090-0222 T LAKES Table of Contents THE Scholar, Teacher, and Mentor: A Tribute to Dr. J. E. McPherson ..............................................i E N GREAT LAKES Dr. J. E. McPherson, Educator and Researcher Extraordinaire: Biographical Sketch and T List of Publications OMO Thomas J. Henry ..................................................................................................111 J.E. McPherson – A Career of Exemplary Service and Contributions to the Entomological ENTOMOLOGIST Society of America L O George G. Kennedy .............................................................................................124 G Mcphersonarcys, a New Genus for Pentatoma aequalis Say (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) IS Donald B. Thomas ................................................................................................127 T The Stink Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) of Missouri Robert W. Sites, Kristin B. Simpson, and Diane L. Wood ............................................134 Tymbal Morphology and Co-occurrence of Spartina Sap-feeding Insects (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha) Stephen W. Wilson ...............................................................................................164 Pentatomoidea (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae, Scutelleridae) Associated with the Dioecious Shrub Florida Rosemary, Ceratiola ericoides (Ericaceae) A. G. Wheeler, Jr. .................................................................................................183
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Has Different Predicted Effects on the Range Shifts of Two Hybridizing Ambush Bug (Phymata, Family Reduviidae, Order Hemiptera) Species
    Received: 16 May 2020 | Revised: 31 August 2020 | Accepted: 4 September 2020 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6820 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Climate change has different predicted effects on the range shifts of two hybridizing ambush bug (Phymata, Family Reduviidae, Order Hemiptera) species Vicki Mengyuan Zhang1,2 | David Punzalan1,3 | Locke Rowe1 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Abstract Canada Aim: A universal attribute of species is that their distributions are limited by numer- 2 Department of Biology, University of ous factors that may be difficult to quantify. Furthermore, climate change-induced Toronto, Mississauga, ON, Canada 3Department of Biology, University of range shifts have been reported in many taxa, and understanding the implications Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada of these shifts remains a priority and a challenge. Here, we use Maxent to predict Correspondence current suitable habitat and to project future distributions of two closely related, Vicki Mengyuan Zhang, Department of parapatrically distributed Phymata species in light of anthropogenic climate change. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks St. Toronto, ON Location: North America. M5S 3B2, Canada. Taxon: Phymata americana Melin 1930 and Phymata pennsylvanica Handlirsch 1897, Email: [email protected] Family: Reduviidae, Order: Hemiptera. Funding information Methods: We used the maximum entropy modeling software Maxent to identify en- Theodore Roosevelt Collection Study Grant; Canadian Network for Research and vironmental variables maintaining the distribution of two Phymata species, Phymata Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural americana and Phymata pennsylvanica. Species occurrence data were collected from Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada museum databases, and environmental data were collected from WorldClim.
    [Show full text]
  • Beneficial Insects of Utah Guide
    BENEFICIAL INSECTS OF UTAH beneficial insects & other natural enemies identification guide PUBLICATION COORDINATORS AND EDITORS Cami Cannon (Vegetable IPM Associate and Graphic Design) Marion Murray (IPM Project Leader) AUTHORS Cami Cannon Marion Murray Ron Patterson (insects: ambush bug, collops beetle, red velvet mite) Katie Wagner (insects: Trichogramma wasp) IMAGE CREDITS All images are provided by Utah State University Extension unless otherwise noted within the image caption. CONTACT INFORMATION Utah State University IPM Program Dept. of Biology 5305 Old Main Hill Logan, UT 84322 (435) 797-0776 utahpests.usu.edu/IPM FUNDING FOR THIS PUBLICATION WAS PROVIDED BY: USU Extension Grants Program CONTENTS PREFACE Purpose of this Guide ................................................................6 Importance of Natural Enemies ..................................................6 General Practices to Enhance Natural Enemies ...........................7 Plants that will Enhance Natural Enemy Populations ..................7 PREDATORS Beetles .....................................................................................10 Flies .........................................................................................24 Lacewings/Dustywings .............................................................32 Mites ........................................................................................36 Spiders .....................................................................................42 Thrips ......................................................................................44
    [Show full text]
  • Heteroptera: Cimicomorpha) of the United States
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 52 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2019 Numbers 3 & Article 4 4 - Fall/Winter 2019 New State Records For Some Predatory And Parasitic True Bugs (Heteroptera: Cimicomorpha) of the United States Daniel R. Swanson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Swanson, Daniel R. "New State Records For Some Predatory And Parasitic True Bugs (Heteroptera: Cimicomorpha) of the United States," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 52 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol52/iss2/4 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. New State Records For Some Predatory And Parasitic True Bugs (Heteroptera: Cimicomorpha) of the United States Cover Page Footnote The bulk of the work that went into this study was carried out during my time in the UMMZ, and I am grateful to Mark O’Brien (UMMZ) and Gary Parsons (MSUC) for the privilege of studying the material under their care. I also owe thanks to Tamera Lewis (USDA-ARS, Yakima Agricultural Research Laboratory, Wapato, Washington) and Paul Masonick (University of California, Riverside) for correspondence regarding identified material and state ecorr ds of some "anthocoroid" and phymatine taxa, respectively. I also greatly appreciate the efforts of two anonymous reviewers, who made me aware of several obscure references and/or overlooked records, thereby significantly improving the utility of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of the Biological Survey of Canada
    Newsletter of the Biological Survey of Canada Vol. 39(2) December 2020 The Newsletter of the BSC is published twice a year by the Biological Survey of Canada, an incorporated not-for-profit In this issue group devoted to promoting biodiversity science in Canada. From the Editor’s Desk.............2 Membership....................3,15 President’s Report.................4 Feature Article: Sandhill Gold: The Goldsmith BSC Facebook & Twitter..........5 Beetle (Cotalpa lanigera, Contributing to the BSC Scarabaeidae, Coleoptera) in Newsletter.......................5 the Sandhills of Southwestern Highlights of the 2020 AGM...6 Manitoba Request for Specimens...........7 Robert Wrigley & Tim Arendse......19 Carabidae from across North America; Kevin Floate Certain Paraleptophlebia and Rhithrogena (Ephemeroptera) from eastern Canada; Steve Burian Elateridae from across Canada; Project Update Scott Gilmore Project Update Spider Diversity of British Spider Diversity of British Columbia: Columbia: Almost 900 Spe- Almost 900 Species & Still Counting cies and Still Counting Robb Bennett, Darren Copley and Robb Bennett, Darren Copley and Claudia Copley..............................8 Claudia Copley........................8 New Projects 1. Warm & Comfortable within Hollow Stems, Leaf-mines and Galls: Little New Projects known habitats for Entomologists & Botanists to explore, Peter G. Kevan, 1. Warm & Comfortable within Hollow Stems, Leaf- Charlotte Coates, Patricia Nunes mines and Galls: Little known habitats for Entomol- Silva, & Marla Larson...................11
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnida: Opiliones) İlkay ÇORAK ÖCAL1, *, Nazife YIĞIT KAYHAN2
    June, 2018; 2 (1): 8-16 e-ISSN 2602-456X DOI: 10.31594/commagene.395576 Research Article / Araştırma Makalesi External Morphology of Pyza taurica Gruber, 1979 (Arachnida: Opiliones) İlkay ÇORAK ÖCAL1, *, Nazife YIĞIT KAYHAN2 1, *Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Çankırı Karatekin University, 18200 Çankırı / TURKEY 2Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Arts, University of Kırıkkale, 71450 Kırıkkale / TURKEY Received: 02.12.2017 Accepted: 02.02.2018 Available online: 19.02.2018 Published: 30.06.2018 Abstract: The harvestmen species Pyza taurica Gruber, 1979 (Opilionida, Nemastomatidae) is endemic to Anatolia. In this study, external morphology of P. taurica was investigated in detail by using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Cuticular structures and sense organs on the segments of legs, pedipalps, chelicerae, and the dorsal integument of male specimens of P. taurica are investigated and depicted, in particular, characters of taxonomic and systematic importance. Such studies are needed especially for understanding the functional anatomy and morphology of opilionids. Keywords: Pyza taurica, Nemastomatidae, Opiliones, harvestmen, external morphology, scanning electron microscopy, endemic. Pyza taurica'nın Gruber, 1979 Dış Morfolojisi (Arachnida: Opiliones) Özet: Pyza taurica Gruber, 1979 (Opilionida, Nemastomatidae) otbiçen türü Anadolu’ya özgüdür. Bu çalışmada, P. taurica'nın dış morfolojisi ayrıntılı olarak taramalı elektron mikroskopu (SEM) kullanılarak araştırılmıştır. Özellikle taksonomik ve sistematik önem taşıyan
    [Show full text]
  • Harvestmen (Opiliones: Gonyleptidae) Predating on Treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae)
    ARTÍCULO: Harvestmen (Opiliones: Gonyleptidae) predating on treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae) Luciano Mendes Castanho & Ricardo Pinto da Rocha Abstract: A male and female of the gonyleptidean Neosadocus maximus (Giltay 1928) were observed eating frogs in the Atlantic Rain Forest of southeastern Brazil. This is the first report of a harvestman species eating amphibians. Key words: Opiliones, Brazil, Atlantic Rain Forest, predation, frogs. Harvestmen (Opiliones: Gonyleptidae) Predating On Treefrogs (Anura: ARTÍCULO: Hylidae) Harvestmen (Opiliones: Gonyleptidae) Resumen: Predating On Treefrogs (Anura: Hyli- Un macho y una hembra del gonyleptido Neosadocus maximus (Giltay, 1928) dae) fueron observados comiendo ranas en el Bosque Lluvioso Atlántico del sudeste de Brasil. Este es el primer informe de un opilión que come anfibios. Luciano Mendes Castanho Palabras clave: Opiliones, Brasil, bosque lluvioso atlántico, predación, ranas. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Centro de Ciências Médi- cas e Biológicas, Departamento de Morfologia e Patologia. Praça Dr. José Ermírio de Moraes, Most arachnids are exclusively predators, excluding opilionids and 290, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil, 18030- some groups of mites that feed on dead matter or are phytophagous. It is 230. [email protected] remarkable that harvestmen are omnivorous, feeding on live and dead ani- Ricardo Pinto da Rocha mals, plants and fungi. However, the trend is toward carnivory with an op- Departamento de Zoologia, Universi- dade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal portunistic diet (Gnaspini 1996, Acosta & Machado in press). Nevertheless, 11461, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 05422- this generalization is not applicable to all groups, because a few harvestmen 970. [email protected] are specialized feeders, such as Ischyropsalis hellwigi (Panzer, 1794) and some Trogulidae, the famous gastropod predators (Acosta & Machado in Revista Ibérica de Aracnología ISSN: 1576 - 9518.
    [Show full text]
  • And Harvestmen (Opiliones) from Malta with a Preliminary Checklist of Maltese Arachnida
    89 (2) · August 2017 pp. 85–110 New records of mites (Acari) and harvestmen (Opiliones) from Malta with a preliminary checklist of Maltese Arachnida Walter P. Pfliegler1,*, Axel Schönhofer2, Wojciech Niedbała3, Patrick Vella†, Arnold Sciberras4 and Antoine Vella5 1 Department of Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Debrecen, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1., 4032 Debrecen, Hungary 2 Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Institut für Zoologie, Abteilung Evolutionsbiologie, Johannes-von-Müller-Weg 6, 55128 Mainz, Germany 3 Department of Animal Taxonomy and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, ul. Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland 4 Nature Trust Malta, PO Box9, VLT 1000, Valetta Malta 5 74, Buontempo Estate, BZN1135 Balzan, Malta * Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Received 16 March 2017 | Accepted 17 May 2017 Published online at www.soil-organisms.de 1 August 2017 | Printed version 15 August 2017 Abstract We present new faunistic records of mites and harvestmen from the Maltese Archipelago and reviewed available data on the faunistics of the class Arachnida of the Archipelago. Literature records of Arachnids are rather scarce and uncomprehensive and up to date, checklists dealing with them have not been published except for spiders and gall mites. Along with newly recorded families, genera and species, we compiled a preliminary checklist and review of Maltese Arachnida to facilitate faunistic research on these groups. In regard to mites, Geckobia sarahae Bertrand, Pfliegler & Sciberras, 2012 is established as a lapsus calami that refers to G. estherae Bertrand, Pfliegler & Sciberras, 2012. Keywords Mediterranean | endemic | soil fauna | faunistics | distribution | anthropogenic habitat 1. Introduction Selmunett Island, Manoel Island, Ta’ Fra Ben Islet and Cominotto.
    [Show full text]