DOCSLIB.ORG

Judging Q and Saving Jesus Llewellyn Howes Harvard Divinity School ISBN: 978-0-620-68737-9 Chief Editor, A.G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Judging Q and Saving Jesus Llewellyn Howes Harvard Divinity School ISBN: 978-0-620-68737-9 Chief Editor, A.G Judging Q and saving Jesus saving and Q Judging The monograph Judging Q and saving Jesus is ambitious in its scope and judicious in its conclusions. According to Llewellyn Howes, the macrogenre of the Sayings Source Q is sapiential with occasional insertions of apocalyptic microstructures and motifs. He hereby puts an end to the great ‘either-or’ of contemporary Jesus scholarship that the historical Jesus was ‘either eschatological or not’ – an alternative that dates back to Albert Schweitzer. Judging Q and Chief Editor, A.G. van Aarde Judging Q and saving Jesus is ambitious in its scope and judicious in its conclusions. The central problem investigated by Llewellyn Howes is exactly how ‘wisdom’ and ‘apocalyptic’ work together in Q, both compositionally and generically, and how they relate to the historical saving Jesus Jesus. Showing a mastery of the relevant primary and secondary literature, Howes – after introductory chapters on the history of Historical Jesus research and Q as a document of the first century – undertakes first of all a detailed examination of Son of Man and eschatological sayings in Q. Howes judges three Son of Man sayings (Q 7:35, 9:58, 12:10) to be authentic, Q’s contribution to the wisdom-apocalypticism two of which belong to the redactional layer of Q, and all three embedded in passages that display a sapiential form of argumentation. Howes also finds that generally, and even when debate in historical Jesus studies used apocalyptically, the term Son of Man tends to support arguments best understood as sapiential in outlook. This is consistent with the sapiential genre of the document as a whole. This finding is supported by the close and careful exegesis of Q 6:37–38 (on not judging) … Howes reconstructs the original wording of the saying in Q and takes the reader deep into the relevant background literature, particularly on the idea of ‘weighing’ in judgment (psychostasia), determining in the end that the saying is entirely sapiential. Daniel A. Smith, Clark and Mary Wright Chair of New Testament Theology, Faculty of Theology, Huron University College, London, Ontario, Canada Judging Q and Saving Jesus is a book that must be commended first of all for its ambition to tackle large, but also extremely crucial issues. The solutions that are provided … are very well argued and … open up significant methodological avenues to which other scholars would do well to pay attention … The textual analyses of single Q passages constitute another great strength of the book. In particular, the deep and convincing reading of Q 6:37–38 … ought to be taken as a model for future similar research on other passages in Q or in other early Christian writings. [T ]he very balanced conclusion with respect to the impact of a study of Howes Llewellyn the Q genre on historical Jesus research is another strong point of the book. Too much of the current writing on the subject is still hindered by the use of too abstract categorizations. Judging Q escapes such problems by attending at categorical distinctions first and foremost by way of the careful and critical reading of primary sources. Giovanni B. Bazzana, Associate Professor of New Testament, Harvard Divinity School www.aosis.co.za ISBN: 978-0-620-68737-9 ® Llewellyn Howes Μὴ κρίνετε, ἵνα μὴ κριθῆτε· ἐν ᾧ γὰρ κρίματι κρίνετε κριθήσεσθε, καὶ ἐν ᾧ μέτρῳ μετρεῖτε μετρηθήσεται ὑμῖν. Judging Q and saving Jesus Q’s contribution to the wisdom-apocalypticism debate in historical Jesus studies LLEWELLYN HOWES Religious Studies Board at AOSIS Chief Editor Andries van Aarde, Honorary Professor, University of Pretoria, South Africa Head Office AOSIS (Pty) Ltd Board Members Postnet Suite #110 Gerald West, Associate Editor, School of Religion, Private Bag X19 Philosophy and Classics in the College of Humanities, Durbanville 7551 University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa South Africa Tel: +27 21 975 2602 Pieter G.R. de Villiers, Associate Editor, Extraordinary Fax: +27 21 975 4635 Professor in Biblical Spirituality, Faculty of Theology, Email: [email protected] University of the Free State, South Africa Website: http://www.aosis.co.za Charles Amjad-Ali, Emeritus, the Martin Luther King, Jr., Professor of Justice and Christian Community and Director of Islamic Studies, Luther Seminary, St. Paul, United States Warren Carter, Professor of New Testament, Brite Divinity School, Fort Worth, United States Christian Danz, Dekan der Evangelisch- Theologischen Fakultät der Universität Wien and Ordentlicher Universitätsprofessor für Systematische Theologie und Religionswissenschaft, University of Vienna, Judging Q and saving Jesus – Q’s contribution to the wisdom- Austria apocalypticism debate in historical Jesus studies ISBN: 978-0-620-68737-9 Musa W. Dube, Department of Theology and Religious How to cite this work: Howes, L., 2015, Judging Q and saving - Q’s Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of Botswana, Botswana contribution to the wisdom-apocalypticism debate in historical Jesus studies. http://www.dx.doi.org/10.4102/aosis.jqsj.2015.01 David D. Grafton, Director of Graduate Studies and Associate Professor of Islamic Studies and Christian-Muslim Relations, Lutheran Theological Seminary in Philadelphia, Listed in OAPEN (http://www.oapen.org), DOAB (http://www. United States doabooks.org/) and indexed by Google Scholar Jens Herzer, Theologische Fakultät der Universität Leipzig, © 2015 L. Howes Germany Copyright on this work is retained by the author(s). Licensee: Jeanne Hoeft, Dean of Students and Associate Professor of AOSIS (Pty) Ltd. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Pastoral Theology and Pastoral Care, Saint Paul School of Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International License. Theology, United States Every effort has been made to protect the interest of copyright holders. Should any infringement have occurred inadvertently, the D. Andrew Kille, Former Chair of the SBL Psychology and publisher apologises and undertakes to amend the omission in the Bible Section, and Editor of the Bible Workbench, San Jose, United States event of a reprint. William R.G. Loader, Emeritus Professor Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia Isabel A. Phiri, Associate General Secretary for Public Witness and Diakonia, World Council of Churches, Geneva, Switzerland Copy editor: Margot von Beck Marcel Sarot, Emeritus, Professor of Fundamental Theology, Proof-reader: Michael Maart Tilburg School of Catholic Theology, Tilburg University, Project manager: Rochelle Flint the Netherlands Front cover: Cecile de Villiers Corneliu C. Simut, Professor of Historical and Dogmatic The publisher accept no responsibility for any statement made or Theology, Emanuel University, Oradea, Bihor, Romania opinion expressed in this publication. Consequently, the publishers Rothney S. Tshaka, Professor and Head of Department of and copyright holder will not be liable for any loss or damage Philosophy, Practical and Systematic Theology, University of sustained by any reader as a result of his or her action upon any South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa statement or opinion in this work. Elaine M. Wainwright, Head of School of Theology, Printed and Bound University of Auckland, New Zealand Mega Digital (Pty) Ltd, South Africa iv Research Justification Llewellyn Howes (PhD), Research Associate, Department of New Testament Studies of the Faculty of Theology at the University of Pretoria The monograph Judging Q and saving Jesus is characterised by careful textual analysis, showing a piercing critical eye in its impressive engagement with the secondary literature, and sharp and insightful critique. The target audience are specialists in the field of research on the Sayings Source Q (the hypothetical source of certain sayings of Jesus common to Matthew and Luke), historical Jesus, and early Christian theology. The book takes the stance that the hypothetical document Q can be reconstructed with sufficient precision and that this enables biblical scholars to study with confidence its genre and its thematic and ideological profile. The genre issue is central to the book overall structure and the alternative proposals are discussed at length and with sophistication. The author’s inference is that Q’s macrogenre is sapiential with occasional insertions of apocalyptic microstructures and motifs. This finding embodies progress in Historical Jesus studies. An opposing trend has been to label Jesus an apocalypticist, so that the great ‘either-or’ of contemporary Jesus scholarship has been ‘either eschatological or not’, an alternative that dates back to Albert Schweitzer. The author finds that generally, and even when used apocalyptically, the term Son of Man tends to support arguments best understood as sapiential in outlook. This is consistent with the sapiential genre of the document as a whole. This finding is supported by the close and careful exegesis of Q 6:37−38 (on not judging). He reconstructs the original wording of this saying ‘on not judging’ and explores the idea of ‘weighing’ in judgment (psychostasia), determining in the end that the saying is entirely sapiential. Chief Editor, A.G. van Aarde The publisher and Editorial Board certify that this work was evaluated in a two-step review process. An initial selection review process by a panel of domain experts; followed by in-depth double-blind peer reviews by three reviewers. They were selected by the Board being content experts in the field of early Christian literature. v Acknowledgments This publication would not have been possible without the guidance and support of my mentor, friend and academic father, Andries G. van Aarde. Thank you for everything! The publication would also not have been possible without the backing of Johan Buitendag, Dean of the Faculty of Theology at the University of Pretoria. I also need to thank Daniel A. Smith, who invited me to deliver a paper at the Society of Biblical Literature (SBL) Annual Meeting in 2013, and opened up a whole new world for me. Many improvements to this book are directly related to my involvement with the Q program unit of the SBL. I am further heavily indebted to James M.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Daily Devotional for Small Group Discussion: Q Source
    Daily Devotional for Small Group Discussion: Q Source www.ucc.org Discussion Questions 1. Do you have friends or family who are Q-Anon followers? How have you tried to engage them? Is there anything that seems true or compelling to you about the theories – and on what do you base your belief? 2. How do we persist past the religion of our own “whims and lusts,” in the words of Jude? How much of your spiritual and religious beliefs in general would you say are a result of your own conrmation bias? How do you challenge your own thinking and keep growing, being “transformed by the renewal of your mind” as Romans urges? 3. What is the core of Christianity for you? How does your faith inuence your vote? Q Source But remember, dear friends, that the apostles of our Master, Jesus Christ, told us this would happen: “In the last days there will be people who don’t take these things seriously anymore. They’ll treat them like a joke, and make a religion of their own whims and lusts.” - Jude 1:17- 18 (MSG) In the mid-rst century, when Matthew and Luke were writing down their Gospels, they both included a trove of Jesus’ sayings called the “Q source.” When the New Testament’s table of contents was compiled, it excluded other texts like the Gospel of Thomas and the Gospel of Mary, and gave privilege of place to Matthew, Luke … and Q. How were the decisions made about which Gospels to keep, and which to cast away? Was it sexism and patriarchy? An attempt to exert control over the populace as the hippie Way of Jesus hardened into a state religion? Or was Q closer to the truth than Mary or Thomas’s tellings? Who gets to decide what truth is, and what criteria do they use? There is a new Q circulating in our culture today that has nothing to do with Jesus, although many of the people proclaiming it are Christians.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnify the Lord, Oh My Soul
    DISCIPLES WOMEN GENERAL PROGRAMS Date: Christmas 2010 By: Beth Rupe Magnify the Lord, Oh My Soul . Christmas 2010 Page 2 Purpose: The purpose of this session is to remind participants that the hope of God’s justice for the world was assured through the coming of Jesus Christ; it is the promise of Christmas. It will challenge participants to reclaim that hope and to live into it as they strive to be agents of God’s justice in light of tragedy of human trafficking that overshadows the lives of many women and children in our world. Suggestions for Leader: Two weeks before the meeting read Luke 1:46 – 55 and Luke 6: 12 - 26. Dwell in these scripture for several days. Read them both silently and aloud. If possible read them in several translations including the one that you read most frequently. Crosswalk.com is a good online resource for different Bible translations. Write down your thoughts, questions, and emotions as you read the scriptures. Note if they remain the same or are different as you read on several occasions. What similarities do you find in these scriptures from chapter 1 and chapter 6? How do they support and reinforce one another? What promises do you hear in these scriptures? Now read the introduction and familiarize yourself with the lesson materials. Visit the Disciples Women website, www.disciplewomen.org, and review the information provided regarding the issue of human trafficking. Check out the websites to familiarize yourself with what other women in other congregations are doing to put an end to modern day slavery.
    [Show full text]
  • James in the “Q” Sayings Tradition: an Examination of the Jesus Logia in the Epistle of St
    Distribution Agreement In presenting this thesis as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree from Emory University, I hereby grant to Emory University and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive, make accessible, and display my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known, including display on the world wide web. I understand that I may select some access restrictions as part of the online submission of this thesis. I retain all ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. Signature: ___________________________________________ Thomas Jared Farmer, April 2, 2012 James in the “Q” Sayings Tradition: An Examination of the Jesus Logia in the Epistle of St. James By Thomas Jared Farmer Master of Theological Studies Candler School of Theology _________________________________________ Signature Dr. Luke Timothy Johnson _________________________________________ Signature Dr. Steven J. Kraftchick _________________________________________ Signature Dr. Walter T. Wilson James in the “Q” Sayings Tradition: An Examination of the Jesus Logia in the Epistle of St. James By Thomas Jared Farmer B.A., University of Illinois Springfield, 2010 Thesis Committee Chair: Luke Timothy Johnson, PhD. An abstract of A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Candler School of Theology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Theological Studies May 2012 ABSTRACT James in the “Q” Sayings Tradition: An Examination of the Jesus Logia in the Epistle of St. James By Thomas Jared Farmer The present investigation concerns itself with assessing the relationship between the Epistle of James and the sayings traditions of Jesus, as found in the Synoptics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apocryphal Gospels
    A NOW YOU KNOW MEDIA W R I T T E N GUID E The Apocryphal Gospels: Exploring the Lost Books of the Bible by Fr. Bertrand Buby, S.M., S.T.D. LEARN WHILE LISTENING ANYTIME. ANYWHERE. THE APOCRYPHAL GOSPELS: EXPLORING THE LOST BOOKS OF THE BIBLE WRITTEN G U I D E Now You Know Media Copyright Notice: This document is protected by copyright law. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. You are permitted to view, copy, print and distribute this document (up to seven copies), subject to your agreement that: Your use of the information is for informational, personal and noncommercial purposes only. You will not modify the documents or graphics. You will not copy or distribute graphics separate from their accompanying text and you will not quote materials out of their context. You agree that Now You Know Media may revoke this permission at any time and you shall immediately stop your activities related to this permission upon notice from Now You Know Media. WWW.NOWYOUKNOWMEDIA.COM / 1 - 800- 955- 3904 / © 2010 2 THE APOCRYPHAL GOSPELS: EXPLORING THE LOST BOOKS OF THE BIBLE WRITTEN G U I D E Table of Contents Topic 1: An Introduction to the Apocryphal Gospels ...................................................7 Topic 2: The Protogospel of James (Protoevangelium of Jacobi)...............................10 Topic 3: The Sayings Gospel of Didymus Judas Thomas...........................................13 Topic 4: Apocryphal Infancy Gospels of Pseudo-Thomas and Others .......................16 Topic 5: Jewish Christian Apocryphal Gospels ..........................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Dianne M. Bazell and Laurence H. Kant
    First-century Christians in the Twenty-first Century: Does Evidence Matter? Dianne M. Bazell and Laurence H. Kant Since the turn of the new millennium, we have seen an immense resurgence of interest in the world of the Early Christians. Even as many biblical scholars have pared Gospel pericopes into fewer and fewer passages they are willing to attribute to Jesus, and some have even abandoned altogether the search for the historical Jesus as a naive and futile enterprise, the public appetite and demand for evidence of “the way it was” in Jesus’ time appears to be increasing. No two works could be more unlike one another in theological motivation and intent than Mel Gibson’s film, The Passion of the Christ, and Dan Brown’s mystery thriller, The Da Vinci Code.1 Yet popular audiences have turned them both into resounding commercial successes and generated spin-off industries for their interpretation and further appreciation. Indeed, both Protestant and Catholic congregations have used showings (or critiques) of The Passion as a vehicle for religious education, while The Da Vinci Code has become a staple of book clubs and inspired guided tours across Italy and France tracing the adventures of its protagonists. Both works present themselves as accurate, evidence-based renditions of Christian history, and it is this popular demand for evidence, as well as its use and abuse in these two blockbusters, that we find most intriguing. No “faith in things unseen” for the modern orthodox—or for earnest heretics, either! Both Gibson and Brown appeal to source documents and reference ancient languages in their efforts to confirm or refute, respectively, specific institutional accounts of Christian history.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Source Hypothesis New Testament
    Two Source Hypothesis New Testament Unestablished Rudie cooeeing, his fix overslips saturate cryptically. Eild Elnar still leaps: dilapidated and gradual Bryce outpraytypifying and quite relived. funny but rebuild her veldts jurally. Quiggly is prepaid and insculp quadruply while gastronomic Zacherie This area as an increasingly influential, new testament source hypothesis which cannot guess to be used. Matthew and new testament scholars note what became obsessed with origin of q materials before teaching of divorce and other against mark, predecessors of this? My students began, sell everything everywhere maintained matthaean tradition must originally composed first two source hypothesis new testament studies? In the culmination of the early christians only in writing and luke wrote bishop recites from some new testament source hypothesis? In oral tradition material culture was finally he publicly states, two source hypothesis new testament, while these lukan locations for us more true because this. Note also that in Matt. The two-source theory has been appropriately dethroned from the status of. Satis probabile est quod unusquisque evangelistarum eo se intento accommodata erant, new testament scholars accept that two source hypothesis new testament. Sermon on twelve, new testament and especially interested in question per issue. We have to compare the three gospels verse by verse in order to try to explain the literary relationship and dependence between them. In addition, Eta Linnemann rejects the Q document hypothesis and denies the existence of a Synoptic problem across all. Who put other two synoptic gospels is expressed in other three gospels view profiles by creating a new testament source hypothesis that it is not adopted prior to.
    [Show full text]
  • 61 Source-Critical Studies in Luke-Acts Igbakua Iorjaah
    Ilorin Journal of Religious Studies, (IJOURELS) Vol.5 No.2, 2015, pp.61-76 SOURCE-CRITICAL STUDIES IN LUKE-ACTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR UNDERSTANDING LUKE, THE EVANGELIST1 Igbakua Iorjaah Benue State University, Makurdi, Nigeria [email protected] +234805 785 7507 Abstract Contemporary scholarship recognises Luke‟s Gospel and Acts of the Apostles as two volumes of Luke‟s one book. This has greatly improved understanding of Luke‟s literary contribution to Jesus‟ story. One gulf yet impedes better knowledge of Luke‟s contribution. For some two centuries now, majority of scholars adopt either the Two- Document Hypothesis or the Two-Gospel Hypothesis in explaining the composition of Luke‟s Gospel. Observably, the Two-Document Hypothesis ignores, and to some degree, the Two-Gospel Hypothesis glosses over Luke‟s rhetorical concerns and narrative goal in writing, which is central to any utterance. This paper examines the usefulness of these approaches and then presents an alternative one. It argues that a more informed understanding of Luke-Acts, while valuing the author‟s sources, should focus on Luke‟s narrative techniques in his two-volume book. The paper employs a language-in-life- situation hermeneutic (name of the theorist), focusing on Luke‟s use of the oral Gospel he internalised during his kerygma performance, to demonstrate how an author‟s use of his sources in a literature is dialogically governed by his rhetorical goal and his ability to manage his sources. The study centres on Luke‟s first volume as a paradigm. Keywords: Source-criticism, Scribality, Intertextuality, Oral performance, Dialogical discourse Introduction Since the nineteenth century, source-critical studies of the Gospels have become literary-driven and are governed by a tendency towards a cut-and-paste view of the use of “sources.” Similarity of language or wording between two gospels is assumed to indicate copying from one of the gospels, leaving no room for other possibilities, like orality.
    [Show full text]
  • Evangelicals and the Synoptic Problem
    EVANGELICALS AND THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM by Michael Strickland A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Theology and Religion School of Philosophy, Theology and Religion University of Birmingham January 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Dedication To Mary: Amor Fidelis. In Memoriam: Charles Irwin Strickland My father (1947-2006) Through many delays, occasioned by a variety of hindrances, the detail of which would be useless to the Reader, I have at length brought this part of my work to its conclusion; and now send it to the Public, not without a measure of anxiety; for though perfectly satisfied with the purity of my motives, and the simplicity of my intention, 1 am far from being pleased with the work itself. The wise and the learned will no doubt find many things defective, and perhaps some incorrect. Defects necessarily attach themselves to my plan: the perpetual endeavour to be as concise as possible, has, no doubt, in several cases produced obscurity. Whatever errors may be observed, must be attributed to my scantiness of knowledge, when compared with the learning and information necessary for the tolerable perfection of such a work.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Synoptic-Problem.Pdf
    THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM: AN INTRODUCTION Clinton Baldwin, Ph.D. THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM ● The Gospels: Matthew, Mark and Luke are called the Synoptic gospels, because they have basically the same plot and many stories in common. Therefore can be “seen together” ● Synoptic means “to see together” Not only do these gospels tell many of the same stories, they often do so using the same words. Such practice is solid indication that the gospels have similar source(s), as it is highly unlikely for three different persons writing at different times and places should use the same words and sequence of events unless they have some common literary dependence 3 THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM ● But the Synoptics not only agree, they also disagree in wording and sequence of events ● Definition: The Synoptic problem has to do with the wide-ranging agreements and disagreements among the three Synoptic Gospels John’s Gospel is different from the Synoptic Gospels ● In John there is: – No genealogy – No manger or virgin birth – No boyhood – No baptism – No temptation – No Mount of Transfiguration John’s Gospel is different from the Synoptic Gospels ▪ In John there is: -No Gethsemane -No scribes -No lepers -No publicans -No demoniacs -No parables -Never cast out a demon Examples of the Synoptic Problem ● Mark 14:12;15:25- Jesus crucified day after the Passover ● John 19:14 - Jesus crucified day before the Passover ● Lk 2:39 - Jesus and family returned to Nazareth a month after going to Bethlehem ● Matt 2:19-22: They fled into Egypt Examples of the Synoptic Problem ● Matt
    [Show full text]
  • The Present State of the Synoptic Problem As Argument for a Synchronic Emphasis in Gospel Interpretation1
    Streeter Versus Farmer | 7 Streeter Versus Farmer: The Present State of the Synoptic Problem as Argument for a Synchronic Emphasis in Gospel Interpretation1 David R. Bauer Asbury Theological Seminary [email protected] Abstract The dominant method for Gospel interpretation over the past several decades has been redaction criticism, which depends upon the adoption of a certain understanding of synoptic relationships in order to identify sources that lie behind our Gospels. Yet an examination of the major proposals regarding the Synoptic problem reveals that none of these offers the level of reliability necessary for the reconstruction of sources that is the presupposition for redaction criticism. This consideration leads to the conclusion that approaches to Gospel interpretation that require no reliance upon specific source theories are called for. Keywords: Synoptic problem, redaction criticism, new redaction criticism, Gospel interpretation, synchronic reading, B. H. Streeter, William R. Farmer. 1 Some minor portions of this article may be also found in Chapter 3 of my book, The Gospel of the Son of God: An Introduction to Matthew (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, forthcoming). See that chapter for a more specific treatment of the implications of synoptic relationships for the interpretation of Matthew’s Gospel. 8 | The Journal of Inductive Biblical Studies 6/2:7-28 (Summer 2019) The Problem In the book I co-authored with Robert Traina, Inductive Bible Study: A Comprehensive Guide to the Practice of Hermeneutics,2 I insisted that the employment of critical methods (e.g., source criticism and redaction criticism) contribute to the reservoir of potential types of evidence that should be considered in the interpretation of passages.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lost Gospel of Q—Fact Or Fantasy? — Eta Linnemann
    Eta Linnemann, “The Lost Gospel Of Q—Fact Or Fantasy?,” Trinity Journal 17:1 (Spring 1996): 3–18. The Lost Gospel Of Q—Fact Or Fantasy?1 — Eta Linnemann * Imagine flying to a non-existent island on an airplane that has not yet been invented. Even if this impossible trip were to take place during the thirteenth month of the year, it would not be as fantastic as the tale, recently christened as scientific certainty by some NT scholars, concerning the so-called lost gospel Q and the earliest Church. The story of Q (short for the German Quelle, meaning “source”) is not exactly hot-off- the-press. It began over a century and a half ago. At that time it was part of the “two-source” theory of gospel origins. In the wake of Enlightenment allegations that the gospels were historically unreliable, it was suggested that their origins were instead primarily literary in nature. Matthew and Luke, the theory went, composed their gospels not based on historical recollection but by using the dual sources of Mark and a hypothetical document called Q. The theory was not without its difficulties, and it is no wonder that many Anglo-Saxon scholars—B. F. Westcott (1825–1901) would be a good example2—as well as formidable German-speaking authorities like Theodor Zahn (1838–1933) and Adolf Schlatter (1852– 1938) declined to embrace it. But it gained ascendancy in Germany, and to this very hour it enjoys a virtual monopoly there and widespread support in many other countries. The much-publicized Jesus Seminar has pushed Q into popular headlines of late.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Bibliographies Yourbest Researchstans Here
    Oxford Bibliographies YourBest ResearchStans Here Lord’s Prayer John Yieh LAST REVIEWED: 28 APRIL 2017 LAST MODIFIED: 26 APRIL 2018 DOI: 10.1093/OBO/9780195393361­0138 Introduction The Lord’s Prayer is a model prayer that Jesus taught his disciples to say as a group (Luke 11:2a, b). It reflects Jesus’ concerns for God’s holiness, God’s kingdom, and God’s will, and tells his followers which physical and spiritual needs they can ask God, their heavenly Father, to help meet. As a community prayer, it gives Christians identity, solidarity, and confidence as the beloved children of God. As a ritual practice, it strengthens the believers’ filial relationship with God, sets priorities for their missions, and provides divine reassurance, inner peace, and eschatological hope to support their daily struggles with the contingencies of their lives and the evil in the world. This prayer summarizes Jesus’ central message regarding the kingdom of God, so it is a major source for scholarly research on the historical Jesus. With its prominent use in catechisms and liturgies, it has shaped the belief and worship of the church so deeply that an increasing number of recent studies are devoted to its interpretation and influence in the history of reception and its particular role in liturgical theology and spiritual formation. General Overviews Ayo 1992 provides a general survey of exegetical issues and interpretive history of the Lord’s Prayer in an accessible style, helpful for students. Klein 2009 offers a critical review of current technical debates on the source­critical and redaction­critical studies of the Lord’s Prayer, noteworthy for scholars.
    [Show full text]