DOCSLIB.ORG

Member Parties Congress and Council Delegations, Valid for 2019 Events

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Member Parties Congress and Council Delegations, Valid for 2019 Events ALDE Party Member Parties Congress and Council delegations, valid for 2019 events The number of delegates that members of the ALDE Party can send to the Congress and Council are outlined in the ALDE Party internal regulations, an explanation of the delegate allocation system can be found below the delegates table. Changes induced by elections will be implemented as of year N+1, i.e. in the year after the elections have taken place. Only delegates from full members of the ALDE Party and LYMEC, the delegates of the ALDE Party's individual members and ALDE Party Bureau members, are permitted to vote at the Congress and Council. Full Member Parties Number of Number of EU last election result in last election Country Full Member Parties Voting Council Voting Congress Member? total votes result in % Delegates Delegates 1 Austria EU NEOS, Austria 268,518 5.30% 2 7 2 Belgium EU MR, Belgium 650,260 9.64% 3 14 3 Belgium EU Open Vld, Belgium 659,571 9.78% 3 14 4 Bulgaria EU MRF, Bulgaria 315,976 9.24% 3 10 5 Croatia EU HNS, Croatia 106,100 5.64% 2 6 6 Croatia EU IDS, Croatia 43,180 2.29% 1 3 7 Cyprus EU United Democrats, Cyprus [1] - 1 2 8 Czech Republic EU ANO, Czech Republic 1,500,113 29.64% 7 33 9 Denmark EU Radikale Venstre, Denmark 161,009 4.60% 2 6 10 Denmark EU Venstre, Denmark 685,188 19.50% 4 18 11 Estonia EU Centre Party, Estonia 142,458 24.80% 4 15 12 Estonia EU Reform Party, Estonia 158,970 27.70% 4 16 13 Finland EU Keskusta, Finland 626,218 21.10% 4 18 14 Finland EU SFP, Finland 144,802 4.88% 2 6 15 France EU Mouvement Radical Social-Liberal, France 106,111 0.47% 1 3 16 France EU UDI, France 687,225 3.03% 3 12 17 Germany EU FDP, Germany 4,999,449 10.70% 12 55 18 Hungary EU Momentum, Hungary 175,229 3.06% 2 6 19 Ireland EU Fianna Fail, Ireland 519,356 24.30% 4 18 20 Italy EU Più Europa, Italy 557,891 1.70% 2 9 21 Italy EU Radicali Italiani, Italy 278,946 0.85% 2 6 22 Latvia EU Latvijas Attīstībai, Latvia 39,110 4.63% 2 5 23 Lithuania EU Darbo Partija, Lithuania 59,620 4.88% 2 5 24 Lithuania EU Liberal Movement, Lithuania 115,361 9.45% 2 7 25 Luxembourg EU Demokratesch Partei, Luxembourg 39,403 16.91% 3 10 26 Netherlands EU D66, Netherlands 1,285,819 12.20% 5 23 27 Netherlands EU VVD, Netherlands 2,238,351 21.30% 8 38 28 Poland EU Nowoczesna, Poland 1,155,370 7.60% 4 19 29 Portugal EU Iniciativa Liberal, Portugal [1] - 1 2 30 Romania EU Union Save Romania, Romania 625,154 8.87% 3 13 31 Slovakia EU Progressive Slovakia, Slovakia [1] - 1 2 32 Slovenia EU LMS, Slovenia 112,250 12.60% 2 8 33 Slovenia EU SMC, Slovenia 86,868 9.75% 2 7 34 Spain EU Ciudadanos, Spain 3,141,570 13.06% 9 45 35 Sweden EU Centerpartiet, Sweden 537,185 8.60% 3 12 36 Sweden EU Liberalerna, Sweden 342,601 5.50% 2 8 37 United Kingdom EU Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 2,371,861 7.37% 6 33 38 Andorra non-EU Partit Liberal, Andorra 4,073 27.68% 1 2 39 Armenia non-EU ANC, Armenia [1] - 1 2 40 Iceland non-EU Viðreisn, Iceland 13,122 6.50% 2 5 41 Kosovo non-EU AKR, Kosovo 34,170 4.67% 2 5 42 North Macedonia non-EU LDP, North Macedonia 26,754 2.32% 1 3 43 Moldova non-EU Partidul Liberal, Moldova 154,518 9.67% 2 8 44 Norway non-EU Venstre, Norway 127,911 4.40% 2 6 45 Russia non-EU Yabloko, Russia 1,051,335 1.99% 3 15 46 Switzerland non-EU FDP, Switzerland 413,444 16.40% 3 14 47 Switzerland non-EU Green Liberal Party, Switzerland 116,641 4.60% 2 6 48 Ukraine non-EU Civic Position, Ukraine 489,523 3.10% 2 9 49 Ukraine non-EU European Party, Ukraine [1] - 1 2 Full Member Parties 145 591 SUBTOTAL [1] ANC - Armenia, UD - Cyprus, Iniciativa Liberal - Portugal, Progressive Slovakia and European Party - Ukraine did not run in the last parliamentary elections in their countries The number of Council delegates for full member parties is calculated as follows: - every full member party receives 1 base delegate - parties can gain additional delegates based on their electoral success, which is calculated by dividing the party's vote total in the most recent national election by 500000 and the respective vote share by 10%, if the country has a total population exceeding 250000 inhabitants. The sum of the resulting numbers is rounded, to give the number of additional delegates. The number of Congress delegates for full member parties is calculated as follows: - every member party receives 1 base delegate - full members receive 1 Congress delegate per Council delegate - parties can gain additional delegates based on their electoral success, which is calculated by dividing the party's vote total in the most recent national election by a value X, which depends on the total number of votes, and the respective vote share by 3%, if the country has a total population exceeding 250 000 inhabitants. The sum of the resulting numbers is rounded, to give the number of additional delegates. 푉표푡푒 푇표푡푎푙 푉표푡푒 푆ℎ푎푟푒 푉표푡푒 푇표푡푎푙 푉표푡푒 푆ℎ푎푟푒 퐶표푢푛푐푙 퐷푒푙푒푔푎푡푒푠 + 1 + + = 푁푢푚푏푒푟 표푓 퐶표푛푔푟푒푠푠 퐷푒푙푒푔푎푡푒푠 푋 3% with X = 100 000 for the first 3 000 000 votes 250 000 between 3 000 000 and 5 000 000 votes 500 000 for votes exceeding a total of 5 000 000 votes Associated Bodies Number of voting Number of voting EU Country Associated Bodies Council Congress Member? Delegates Delegates 1 - - LYMEC 1 10 2 - - ALDE Party Bureau 11 11 3 - - Individual Members 1 4 Associated Bodies 13 25 SUBTOTAL - LYMEC is entitled to 1 voting Council delegate and 10 voting Congress delegates - ALDE Party Bureau members have voting right in Council and Congress - Individual members have 1 Council delegate and 4 Congress delegates Voting Delegates 158 616 TOTAL Affiliate Member Parties Number of non- Number of non- EU Country Affiliate Member Parties voting Council voting Congress Member? Delegates Delegates 1 Croatia EU GLAS, Croatia 1 2 2 Croatia EU HSLS, Croatia 1 2 3 Croatia EU Pametno, Croatia 1 2 4 Gibraltar EU Liberal Party, Gibraltar 1 2 5 Hungary EU Liberálisok, Hungary 1 2 6 Italy EU Team Köllensperger, Italy 1 2 7 Malta EU Partit Demokratiku, Malta 1 2 8 Slovenia EU SAB, Slovenia 1 2 9 United Kingdom EU Alliance, United Kingdom 1 2 10 Armenia non-EU Bright Armenia, Armenia 1 2 11 Azerbaijan non-EU Müsavat, Azerbaijan 1 2 12 Belarus non-EU Party of Freedom and Progress, Belarus 1 2 13 Bosnia and Herzegovinanon-EU LDS, Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 2 14 Bosnia and Herzegovinanon-EU Naša Stranka, Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 2 15 Georgia non-EU Free Democrats, Georgia 1 2 16 Georgia non-EU Republican Party, Georgia 1 2 17 Iceland non-EU Bright Future, Iceland 1 2 18 Montenegro non-EU Liberal Party, Montenegro 1 2 19 Russia non-EU PARNAS, Russia 1 2 20 Ukraine non-EU Syla Lyudey, Ukraine 1 2 Affiliated Member Parties 20 40 SUBTOTAL Associate Members are entitled to 1 non-voting Council delegate and 2 non-voting Congress delegates. Their membership fee is set at 2,000 EUR TOTAL delegates 178 656.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liberal Vision Lite: Your Mid-Monthly Update of News from Liberal International
    Liberal Vision Lite: your mid-monthly update of news from Liberal International Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 6:59 PM Issue n°5 - 15 April 2021 SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER "We have a chance to re-think & re-invent our future", LI President El Haité tells Liberal Party of Canada Convention. In an introductory keynote, President of Liberal International, Dr Hakima el Haité, addressed thousands of liberals at the Liberal Party of Canada‘s largest policy convention in history. WATCH VIDEO CGLI’s Axworthy tells Canadian liberals, "To solve interlinked challenges, common threads must be found." On 9 April, as thousands of Candian liberals joined the Liberal Party of Canada's first-ever virtual National Convention, distinguished liberal speakers: Hon. Lloyd Axworthy, Hon. Diana Whalen, Chaviva Hosek, Rob Oliphant & President of the Canadian Group of LI Hon. Art Eggleton discussed liberal challenges and offered solutions needed for the decade ahead. WATCH VIDEO On World Health Day, Council of Liberal Presidents call for more equitable access to COVID vaccines Meeting virtually on Tuesday 7 April, the Council of Liberal Presidents convened by the President of Liberal International, Dr Hakima el Haité, applauded the speed with which vaccines have been developed to combat COVID19 but expressed growing concern that the rollout has until now been so unequal around the world. READ JOINT STATEMENT LI-CALD Statement: We cannot allow this conviction to mark the end of Hong Kong LI and the Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats released a joint statement on the conviction of LI individual member & LI Prize for Freedom laureate, Martin Lee along with other pro-democracy leaders in Hong Kong, which has sent shockwaves around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Rise of Illiberal Civil Society W
    Executive Summary This publication examines the growing influence of illiberal, anti-Western and socially conservative civil society groups, popular movements and political forces in five post-Soviet states: Georgia, Armenia, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan and Moldova. It finds that illiberal social attitudes remain prevalent across the region, particularly in relation to LGBTI rights, and that they are increasingly being used as opportunities for political mobilisation within these societies. While there have been attempts to create illiberal civil society groups that mirror pro- Western/liberal NGOs or think-tanks, they remain significantly less influential than the institutions and groups linked to the dominant religious organisations in these countries such as the Orthodox Church, or political factions with influence over state resources. What is clear, however, particularly in Ukraine and Georgia, is that there has been a significant rise in far-right and nationalist street movements, alongside smaller but active homophobic gangs. These ‘uncivil rights movements’ still lack broad public support but their political energy and rate of growth is influencing the wider politics of the region. It is clear that illiberal civil society is on the rise in these five countries but it is growing in its own way rather than simply aping its liberal counterparts. Russia has an important role in the rise of illiberal civil society across the region, in particular the way it has disseminated and promoted the concept of ‘traditional values’; however it is important to recognise that while some groups have direct or indirect contact with Russia, many do not and that the primary drivers of such activity are to be found in the local societies of the countries at hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION in SLOVAKIA 30Th March 2019
    PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN SLOVAKIA 30th March 2019 European Zuzana Caputova becomes the first Elections monitor woman to be president of the Republic Corinne Deloy of Slovakia Results As expected, Zuzana Caputova (Progressive Slovakia, PS) was elected President of Slovakia 2nd round on 30th March. The accession of a woman to this post is a first in the country’s history. The candidate won 58.4% of the vote and therefore won easily against her rival, Vice- President of the Commission, responsible for Energy, Maros Sefcovic, who was supported by the party in office Direction-Social Democracy (SMER-SD), who won 41.6% of the vote. During the first round of the election organised on 16th March last Zuzana Caputova had already taken an comfortable lead over her adversary winning 40.57% of the vote (Maros Sefcovic won 18.66%). Turnout rose to 41.79% and was well below that registered in the second round of the previous election on 29th March 2014 (- 8.69 points). Results of the Presidential election on 16th and 30th March 2019 in Slovakia Turn out: 48.74% (1st round) and 41.79% (2nd round) No of votes won % of votes won No of votes won No of votes won Candidates (1st round) (1st round) (2nd round) (2nd round) Zuzana Caputova (Progressive Slovakia, PS) 870 415 40.57 1 056 582 58.40 Maros Sefcovic 400 379 18.66 752 403 41.60 Stefan Harabin 307 823 14.34 Marian Kotleba (Kotleba-People’s Party-New 222 935 10.39 Slovakia, L’SNS) Frantisek Miklosko, independent 122 916 5.72 Bela Bugar (Most-Hid) 66 667 3.10 Milan Krajniak (We are a family, AME R) 59
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860
    PRESERVING THE WHITE MAN’S REPUBLIC: THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN CONSERVATISM, 1847-1860 Joshua A. Lynn A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2015 Approved by: Harry L. Watson William L. Barney Laura F. Edwards Joseph T. Glatthaar Michael Lienesch © 2015 Joshua A. Lynn ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Joshua A. Lynn: Preserving the White Man’s Republic: The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860 (Under the direction of Harry L. Watson) In the late 1840s and 1850s, the American Democratic party redefined itself as “conservative.” Yet Democrats’ preexisting dedication to majoritarian democracy, liberal individualism, and white supremacy had not changed. Democrats believed that “fanatical” reformers, who opposed slavery and advanced the rights of African Americans and women, imperiled the white man’s republic they had crafted in the early 1800s. There were no more abstract notions of freedom to boundlessly unfold; there was only the existing liberty of white men to conserve. Democrats therefore recast democracy, previously a progressive means to expand rights, as a way for local majorities to police racial and gender boundaries. In the process, they reinvigorated American conservatism by placing it on a foundation of majoritarian democracy. Empowering white men to democratically govern all other Americans, Democrats contended, would preserve their prerogatives. With the policy of “popular sovereignty,” for instance, Democrats left slavery’s expansion to territorial settlers’ democratic decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Yulia Malysheva
    A Revolution of the Mind INTERVIEW WITH YULIA MALYSHEVA ulia Sergeevna Malysheva is one of the leading youth activists in Russia. An elected Y municipal deputy in Moscow, a researcher at the Institute for the Economy in Transi- tion, and leader of the youth organization Oborona (which she cofounded) and of the youth branch of the SPS party, Malysheva also later became the leader of the youth branch of the People’s Democratic Union, the political movement led by former Prime Minister Mikhail Kasyanov. In this interview, she speaks about the possibility of a color revolution in Russia, cooperation with other domestic and international youth groups, the Kremlin’s worried reaction, the nature of the Nashi pro-Kremlin youth group, the attempts to unite the Russian democrats, the successes of Oborona, the chances the democrats have of returning to power, and what she expects from the West. Demokratizatsiya: Tell us about Oborona. Malysheva: Oborona is a youth organization that appeared with the Orange wave in Ukraine. It was important for us that many others were waiting for us, since youth have always been in the avant-garde. At that time, our adult colleagues kept arguing as to who was more important. In the end, they got 3 percent [in the Duma elections]. It was evi- dent that they were not well presented before the Russian voters. We founded Oborona not only with young people who sympathize with SPS, Yabloko, the [former SPS leader and independent candidate Irina] Khakamada movement and other such formations—but also with those who support the democratic process and oppose the Putin regime.
    [Show full text]
  • The Noncommunist Left, Social Constituencies, and Political Strategies in Russia
    The Noncommunist Left, Social Constituencies, and Political Strategies in Russia PAUL T. CHRISTENSEN efining and identifying the noncommunist Left in Russia is in many ways an Dexercise in frustration. Whereas the organizations of the noncommunist Left in Russia are somewhat more permanent than that analogy suggests, the sugges- tion that we are dealing with tenuous political formations, with few exceptions, very much to the point. There are many such organizations in Russia; some are relatively stable and have a history, many are not; and all of them are relatively small and have problematic constituencies. There are three central questions to address if we are to understand the potential political import of these groups for Russia’s political future. First, what are the organizations and parties of the non- communist Left that have any stature and political salience? Second, what are their actual or potential social constituencies? Third, what are the political strate- gies of the noncommunist Left, and why does it seem to have such a problem in carving out a political space in contemporary Russia? Before discussing the specific questions raised above, it is important to situ- ate the noncommunist Left in Russia, and indeed the entire Russian political spec- trum, on the conceptual map of political ideologies used in Western social science. Left—historically centered around socialist and communist movements—puts a high value on democracy in the economic as well as in the political realm, on eco- nomic egalitarianism, and traditionally views an expansive role for the state and organized social interests in the operation of society as necessary and positive.
    [Show full text]
  • BOOK ALL.P65
    LIBERAL INTERNATIONAL THE BARCELONA PROCESS 175th EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 5-6 NOVEMBER MALLORCA, SPAIN Sponsored by With the support of the European Parliament With the support of the Dutch Foreign Office Table of Contents Background - Barcelona Process 2 - Economic and Financial Chapter 3 - Foreign Policy and Security Chapter 4 - Israel and Palestine 5 - Human Rights 6 Programme 7-9 Professional Profiles 10-14 Participants 14-16 The Barcelona Process The poor democratic record of Maghreb and Mashrek countries, com- bined with the demographic trends and the economic imbalances be- tween the southern and the northern shores of the Mediterranean, led to the launch of a new initiative in 1995, the Euro-Mediterranean Partner- ship (EMP), which became known as the Barcelona Process. It was launched to foster cooperation on political reform, economic liberalisation, and social issues between the European Union (EU) and the countries on the southern and eastern rim of the Mediterranean (Algeria, Cyprus, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Malta, Morocco, the Palestinian Authority, Syria, Tunisia, and Turkey). Members are commit- ted to implementing reforms and continuing dialogue. The agreement calls for reform in three areas, known as the political, economic, and social chapters. The first objective is the creation of a common area of peace and stability through the reinforcement of political and security dialogues based on fundamental principles such as respect for human rights and democracy (Political and Security Chapter). The second objective calls for the construction of a zone of shared pros- perity through an economic and financial partnership that includes the gradual establishment of a free zone by 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberalism, Marxism and Democratic Theory Revisited: Proposal of a Joint Index of Political and Economic Democracy
    brazilianpoliticalsciencereview ARTICLE Liberalism, Marxism and Democratic Theory Revisited: Proposal of a Joint Index of Political and Economic Democracy Angelo Segrillo Department of History, University of São Paulo Liberalism and Marxism are two schools of thought which have left deep imprints in sociological, political and economic theory. They are usually perceived as opposite, rival approaches. In the field of democracy there is a seemingly in- surmountable rift around the question of political versus economic democracy. Liberals emphasize the former, Marxists the latter. Liberals say that economic democracy is too abstract and fuzzy a concept, therefore one should concentrate on the workings of an objective political democracy. Marxists insist that political democracy without economic democracy is insufficient. The article argues that both propositions are valid and not mutually exclu- sive. It proposes the creation of an operational, quantifiable index of economic democracy that can be used alongside the already existing indexes of political democracy. By using these two indexes jointly, political and economic democracy can be objectively evaluated. Thus, the requirements of both camps are met and maybe a more dialogical approach to democracy can be reached in the debate between liberals and Marxists. The joint index is used to evaluate the levels of economic and political democracy in the transition countries of Eastern Europe. Keywords: democratic theory; transition countries; economic democracy Introduction iberalism and Marxism are two schools of thought which have left deep imprints Lin political, sociological and economic theory. Both have been very fruitful in il- luminating a wide range of common issues across these fields and yet are usually perceived 8 bpsr Liberalism, Marxism and Democratic Theory Revisited: Proposal of a Joint Index of Political and Economic Democracy as opposite, rival approaches contradicting each other in general.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Shadow of Ordoliberalism: Germany's Approach to the Euro Crisis
    brief policy The long shadow of ordoliberalism: germany’s approach To The euro crisis sebastian dullien and ulrike guérot At the end of January, European leaders agreed the wording SUMMARY The new treaty agreed by European leaders of the new treaty aimed primarily at tightening fiscal policy in in January reflects Germany’s distinctive the euro area that was agreed in principle by 26 EU heads of approach to the euro crisis rather than collective government at last December’s European summit. The treaty compromise. Much to the frustration of many reflects German positions rather than collective compromise. other eurozone countries, Germany has imposed In particular, the treaty centres on a “fiscal compact” that its own approach – centred on austerity and price stability at the expense of economic growth compels all eurozone countries to incorporate into their – on others without considering whether the constitutions a deficit limit modelled on the German institutional flaws of monetary union beyond a Schuldenbremse, or “debt brake”. In addition, European lack of fiscal control may be the cause of some leaders once again ruled out the possibility of using European of the distortions and problems that the current Central Bank (ECB) funds to “leverage” the European euro crisis has exposed or whether its approach Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) or European Stability could have a negative impact on other eurozone Mechanism (ESM), and there was no mention of ECB bond countries. German economic orthodoxy has been widely criticised elsewhere in Europe. purchases to help stabilise bond markets. This brief explores the historical and ideological However, although the new treaty reflects views that are foundations of German economic thinking supported by a broad consensus in Germany (strict opposition and discusses how it differs from mainstream to ECB intervention and a one-sided focus on fiscal austerity), international economic discourse.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovakia: Continuation of Electoral Earthquakes Peter Spácˇ
    Slovakia: Continuation of electoral earthquakes peter spácˇ The 2019 European Parliament (EP) election was held in Slovakia on May 25th, the fourth time since the country’s accession to the EU. Two points are worth mentio- ning at the outset. Firstly, turnout increased considerably since the previous election in 2014. However, with roughly one in four voters participating in the election, it was still the lowest turnout in the whole EU. Secondly, the results confirmed the substantial recent changes in Slovakia's political life, with critical implications for the coming years. In line with other EU countries, the elections are held under proportional re- presentation rules. Similar to national elections, there is only one constituency that comprises the whole country. The threshold is set at 5%, which effectively bans smal- ler parties from obtaining EP seats. Similar to several other member states, Slova- kia does not allow its citizens to vote from abroad in EP elections. The country elects fourteen members of the EP (MEPs), although it will only have thirteen until Bre- xit is finalised. background and campaign In the 2016 general election Slovakia experienced a huge shift of its party system. Although SMER-SD lost a considerable part of its support, it maintained its position as first party. As for past elections, populist and antisystem parties gained parliamentary representation, including the extreme right People’s Party-Our Slovakia (LSNS). This electoral success led the new coalition government formed by SMER-SD and its ju- nior partners to state that they serve as a ‘barrier against extremism’ (Rybáˇr and Spáˇc, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Demystifying the Welfare State: the Case of the Republic of Moldova
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 11-2015 Demystifying the welfare state: the case of the Republic of Moldova Claudette M. Sevcenco Depaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Sevcenco, Claudette M., "Demystifying the welfare state: the case of the Republic of Moldova" (2015). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 202. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/202 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEMYSTIFYING THE WELFARE STATE: THE CASE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts December, 2015 BY Claudette M. Sevcenco School of Public Service College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences DePaul University Chicago, Illinois Abstract During the communist era, Eastern Europe and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) shared a similar welfare system in which welfare states were part of an inseparable political and economic system controlled by a totalitarian power i.e., the Communist Party. After the fall of the USSR, in 1989, an end to social provision led to a massive recession that created pressures within the welfare state system. Despite similar pre-transition welfare state structures, the newly independent countries drastically diverged in how they developed their welfare state: some began pursuing integration into the European Union (EU) while others remained uncertain of their future.
    [Show full text]