DOCSLIB.ORG

Heteropatriarchy and the Three Pillars of White

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heteropatriarchy and the Three Pillars of White HETEROPATRIARCHY AND THE THREE PILLARS OF WHITE SUPREMACY RETHINKING WOMEN OF COLOR ORGANIZING by Andrea Smith – Cherokee intellectual, feminist, and anti-violence activist Scenario #1 These incidents, which happen quite A group of women of color come together frequently in “women of color” or “people of to organize. An argument ensues about color” political organizing struggles, are often whether or not Arab women should be explained as consequence of “oppression included. Some argue that Arab women are olympics.” That is to say, one problem we “white” since they have been classified as such have is that we are too busy fighting over who in the U.S. census. Another argument erupts is more oppressed. In this essay, I want to over whether or not Latinas qualify as argue that these incidents are not so much the “women of color,” since some may be result of “oppression olympics” but are more classified as “white” in their Latin American about how we have inadequately framed countries of origin and/or “pass” as white in “women of color” or “people of color” the United States. politics. That is, the premise behind much “women of color” organizing is that women Scenario #2 from communities victimized by white In a discussion on racism, some people supremacy should unite together around their argue that Native peoples suffer from less shared oppression. This framework might be racism than other people of color because represented by a diagram of five overlapping they generally do not reside in segregated circles, each marked Native women, Black neighborhoods within the United States. In women, Arab/Muslim Women, Latinas and addition, some argue that since tribes now Asian American women, overlapping like a have gaming, Native people are no longer Venn diagram. “oppressed.” This framework has proven to be limited for women of color and people of color Scenario #3 organizing. First, it tends to presume that our A multiracial campaign develops involving communities have been impacted by white diverse communities of color in which some supremacy in the same way. Consequently, participants charge that we must stop the we often assume that all of our communities black/white binary, and end Black hegemony will share similar strategies for liberation. In over people of color politics to develop a fact, however, our strategies often run into more “multicultural” framework. However, conflict. For example, one strategy that many this campaign continues to rely on strategies people in U.S.-born communities adopt, is to and cultural motifs developed by the Black join the military. We then become complicit Civil Rights struggle in the United States. in oppressing and colonizing communities from other countries. Meanwhile, people 1 from other countries often adopt the strategy commodifies most people – the logic of of moving to the United States to advance slavery applies a racial hierarchy to this economically, without considering their system. This racial hierarchy tells people that complicity in settling on the lands of as long as you are not Black, you have the indigenous peoples that are being colonized by opportunity to escape the commodification of the United States. capitalism. This helps people who are not Consequently, it may be more helpful to Black to accept their lot in life, because they adopt an alternative framework for women of can feel that at least they are not at the very color and people of color organizing. I call bottom of the racial hierarchy – at least they one such framework the “Three Pillars of are not property; at least they are not White Supremacy.” This framework does not slaveable. assume that racism and white supremacy is The logic of slavery can be seen clearly in enacted in a singular fashion; rather, white the current prison-industrial complex (PIC). supremacy is constituted by separate and While the PIC generally incarcerates distinct, but still interrelated, logics. Envision communities of color, it seems to be three pillars, one labeled Slavery/Capitalism, structured primarily on an anti-Black racism. another labeled Genocide/Colonialism, and That is, prior to the Civil War, most people in the last one labeled Orientalism/War, as well prison were white. However, after the as arrows connecting each of the pillars thirteenth amendment was passed – which together. banned slavery, except for those in prison – Black people previously enslaved through the SLAVERY/CAPITALISM slavery system were re-enslaved through the prison system. Black people who had been One pillar of white supremacy is the logic the property of slave owners became state of slavery. As Sora Han, Jared Sexton and property, through the conflict leasing system. Angela P. Harris note, this logic renders Black Thus, we can actually look at the people as inherently slave-able – as nothing criminalization of Blackness as a logical more than property.1 That is, in this logic of extension of Blackness as property. white supremacy, Blackness becomes equated with slaveability. The forms of slavery may GENOCIDE/COLONIALISM change – whether it is through the formal system of slavery, sharecropping, or through A second pillar of white supremacy is the the current prison-industrial complex – but logic of genocide. This logic holds that the logic itself has remained consistent. indigenous peoples must disappear. In fact, The logic is the anchor of capitalism. That they must always be disappearing, in order to is, the capitalist system ultimately commodifies allow non-indigenous people the rightful claim all workers – one’s own person becomes a over this land. Through this logic of genocide, commodity that one must sell in the labor non-Native peoples then become the rightful market while the profits of one’s work are inheritors of all that was indigenous – land, taken by someone else. To keep this capitalist resources, indigenous spirituality, or culture. system in place – which ultimately As Kate Shanley notes, Native peoples are a 2 permanent “present absence” in the U.S. indigenous peoples have disappeared. colonial imagination, an “absence” that rein- forces, at every turn, the conviction that ORIENTALISM/WAR Native peoples are indeed vanishing and the conquest of Native land is justified. Ella Shoat A third pillar of white supremacy is the and Robert Stam describe this absence as “an logic of Orientalism. Orientalism was defined ambivalently repressive mechanism [which] by Edward Said as the process of the West dispels the anxiety in the face of the Indian, defining itself as a superior civilization by whose very presence is a reminder of the constructing itself in opposition to an “exotic” initially precarious grounding of the American but inferior “Orient.” (Here, I am using the nation-state itself....In a temporal paradox, term “Orientalism” more broadly than to living Indians were induced to ‘play dead,’ as it solely signify what has been historically named were, in order to perform a narrative of as the Orient or Asia.) The logic of manifest destiny in which their role, ultimately, Orientalism marks certain peoples or nations 2 was to disappear.” as inferior and as posing a constant threat to Rayna Green further elaborates that the the well-being of empire. These peoples are current Indian “wannabe” phenomenon is still seen as “civilizations” – they are not based on the logic of genocide: non-Native property or “disappeared” – however, they peoples imagine themselves as the rightful will always be imagined as permanent foreign inheritors of all that previously belonged to threats to empire. This logic is evident in the “vanished” Indians, thus entitling them to anti-immigration movements within the United ownership of this land. “The living States that target immigrants of color. It does performance of ‘playing Indian’ by non-Indian not matter how long the immigrants of color peoples depends upon the physical and reside in the United States, they generally psychological removal, even the death, of real become targeted as foreign threats, Indians. In that sense the performance, particularly during war time. Consequently, purportedly often done out of a stated and orientalism serves as the anchor for war, implicit love for Indians, is really the obverse because it allows the United States to justify or another well-known cultural phenomenon, being in a constant state of war to protect ‘Indian hating,’ as most often expressed in itself from its enemies. another, deadly performance genre called For example, the United States feels 3 ‘genocide.’” After all, why would non-Native entitled to use Orientalist logic to justify racial peoples need to play Indian – which often profiling of Arab Americans so that it can be includes acts of spiritual appropriation and strong enough to fight the “war on terror.” land theft – if they thought Indians were still Orientalism also allows the United States to alive and perfectly capable of being Indian defend the logics of slavery and genocide, as themselves? The pillar of genocide serves as these practices enable the United States to the anchor for colonialism – it is what allows stay “strong enough” to fight these constant non-Native people to feel they can rightfully wars. What becomes clear then is what Sora own indigenous peoples’ land. It is okay to Han states – the United States is not at war; take land from indigenous peoples because the United States is war.4 For the system of 3 white supremacy to stay in place, the United and Asian peoples are promised that they will States must always be at war. economically and politically advance if they Because we are situated within different join U.S. wars to spread “democracy.” Thus, logics of white supremacy, we may people of color organizing must be premised misunderstand a racial dynamic if we on making strategic alliances with each other, simplistically try to explain one logic of white based on where we are situated within the supremacy with another logic.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Systemic Classism, Systemic Racism: Are Social and Racial Justice Achievable in the United States?
    Systemic Classism, Systemic Racism: Are Social and Racial Justice Achievable in the United States? THOMAS KLEVEN† I. INTRODUCTION The thesis of this article is that the United States is systemically a highly classist and racist society, that classism and racism are interrelated and overlapping phenomena, and that the achievement of a non- classist/non-racist society requires a mass movement of working-class people of all ethnicities for social and racial justice for all. By systemic classism/racism I mean that the political and economic institutions of the society are structured and operate to systematically disadvantage working-class people in general, and ethnic minorities in particular, and to systematically advantage a relatively small and largely white upper elite class, and a rather substantial and predominantly white upper middle class. By systemic advantage/disadvantage I mean that the opportunities to succeed in life are unequally distributed along class and racial lines, and that society’s institutions produce and perpetuate this class/race hierarchy. The discussion of race focuses primarily on African Americans and Hispanics, both of whom have been systematically disadvantaged on account of ethnicity.1 As the society’s largest disadvantaged minorities, † Professor of Law, Thurgood Marshall School of Law, Texas Southern University. I would like to thank my colleagues who attended and made helpful comments on an earlier draft of the article presented at a Faculty Quodlibet at the law school in November, 2007. I would especially like to thank Asmara Tekle-Johnson for suggestions on how better to organize the article, and Jon Levy for pointing out errors in and suggesting sources for the historical parts of the article.
    [Show full text]
  • Racial Critiques of Mass Incarceration: Beyond the New Jim Crow
    RACIAL CRITIQUES OF MASS INCARCERATION: BEYOND THE NEW JIM CROW JAMES FORMAN, JR.* In the last decade, a number of scholars have called the American criminal justice system a new form of Jim Crow. These writers have effectively drawn attention to the injustices created by a facially race-neutral system that severely ostracizes offenders and stigmatizes young, poor black men as criminals. I argue that despite these important contributions, the Jim Crow analogy leads to a distorted view of mass incarceration. The analogy presents an incomplete account of mass incarceration’s historical origins, fails to consider black attitudes toward crime and punishment, ignores violent crimes while focusing almost exclusively on drug crimes, obscures class distinctions within the African American community, and overlooks the effects of mass incarceration on other racial groups. Finally, the Jim Crow analogy diminishes our collective memory of the Old Jim Crow’s particular harms. INTRODUCTION In the five decades since African Americans won their civil rights, hundreds of thousands have lost their liberty. Blacks now make up a larger portion of the prison population than they did at the time of Brown v. Board of Education, and their lifetime risk of incarceration has doubled. As the United States has become the world’s largest jailerand its prison population has exploded, black men have been particularly affected. Today, black men are imprisoned at 6.5 times the rate of white men. While scholars have long analyzed the connection between race and America’s criminal justice system, an emerging group of scholars and advocates has highlighted the issue with a provocative claim: They argue that our growing penal system, with its black tinge, constitutes nothing less than a new form of Jim Crow.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Arab American Racialization and Its Effect
    ABSTRACT Arab American Racialization and its Effect oniAmerican Islamophobiaa in the United States Catherine Haseman Director: Dr. Lisa Lacy, Ph.D. Over the past few years, anti-Muslim and anti-Arab rhetoric and discrimination has surged. Prejudice against Arabs and Muslims has moved from the fringes of American society to the mainstream. The American Islamophobic discourse is so deeply rooted in U.S. history, culture, and society that we often misunderstand its origins as well as its manifestations. This paper proposes a critical dialogue about how to understand one contested concept (Islamophobia) by using another contested one (racialization). This paper seeks to understand if--and if so, to what extent--racialization is central to understanding America’s pernicious brand of Islamophobia. In addition to reviewing the historical connection between racialization and Islamophobia, this paper analyzes the results of a survey of Texans’ views of Islam and Muslims. The survey results are used to understand how racialized conceptions of Arab Muslims correspond with Islamophobic tropes. APPROVED BY DIRECTOR OF HONORS THESIS: ____________________________________________ Dr. Lisa Lacy, Department of History APPROVED BY THE HONORS PROGRAM: __________________________________________________ Dr. Elizabeth Corey, Director DATE: _________________________________ ARAB AMERICAN RACIALIZATION AND ITS EFFECTS ON AMERICAN ISLAMOPHOBIA A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Baylor University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Honors Program
    [Show full text]
  • Psychological Study of Sex & Gender
    Updated last on October 9, 2020 Psychological Study of Sex & Gender PSY 2240 [4-credits] Fall 2020 Özge Savaş (she/her) || [email protected] || Barn 214A Class meets online Every Monday and Thursday, 2-4:30pm Student (office) hours online Every Wednesday, 1:30-3:30pm (and by appointment) COURSE DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES Why is the first thing people want to know about a baby is their gender/sex? How are children socialized into gender/sex binaries? How do dominant social and cultural formations actually produce men and women? How is gender/sex related to sexuality? What is it that we are attracted to in another person? Body frames? Masculinity/femininity? Having a penis or a vagina/vulva? How does gender/sex depend on other categories such as race/ethnicity, nationality, class, religion, and ability? How do interlocking systems of oppression (e.g. sexism, racism, classism, xenophobia, ableism) influence people’s lives? In this class, we will learn to make evidence-based arguments about gender and sex while situating lived experiences of women and sexual minorities in context, gain media literacy in examining examples from pop culture, understand the role of heteropatriarchal and racist ideologies and institutions in social inequity, and learn to think and write critically about gender in its social, cultural, historical and political context. LEARNING GOALS § Explain how dominant social and cultural formations of gender actually produce women and men, girls and boys. § Identify interlocking systems of oppression (i.e. heteropatriarchy, transphobia, racism, classism, xenophobia, ableism) and analyze the relationship of gender other categories (i.e. race, ethnicity, nationality, ability, class, sexuality).
    [Show full text]
  • Heteropatriarchy and the Three Pillars of White Supremacy Rethinking Women of Color Organizing
    Heteropatriarchy and the Three Pillars of White Supremacy Rethinking Women of Color Organizing Andrea Smith Scenario #1 A group of women of color come together to organize. An argu- ment ensues about whether or not Arab women should be included. Some argue that Arab women are "white" since they have been classified as such in the US census. Another argument erupts over whether or not Latinas qualify as "women of color," since some may be classified as "white" in their Latin American countries of origin and/or "pass" as white in the United States. Scenario #2 In a discussion on racism, some people argue that Native peoples suffer from less racism than other people of color because they gen- erally do not reside in segregated neighborhoods within the United States. In addition, some argue that since tribes now have gaming, Native peoples are no longer "oppressed." Scenario #3 A multiracial campaign develops involving diverse conpunities of color in which some participants charge that we must stop the blacklwhite binary, and end Black hegemony over people of color politics to develop a more "multicultural" framework. However, this campaign continues to rely on strategies and cultural motifs developed by the Black Civil Rights struggle in the United States. These incidents, which happen quite frequently in "women of color" or "pee;' of color" political organizing struggles, are often explained as a consequenii. "oppression olympics." That is to say, one problem we have is that we are too b::- fighting over who is more oppressed. In this essay, I want to argue that thescir- dents are not so much the result of "oppression olympics" but are more abour t-, we have inadequately framed "women of color" or "people of color" politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Straight Identity Power Jake Beardsley, College of William and Mary
    1 Straight Identity Power Jake Beardsley, College of William and Mary Abstract: By adapting Miranda Fricker’s concept of identity power, I develop the concept of Straight Identity Power, which is available to persons who are perceived as heterosexual and cisgender. Although it is possible for queer and feminist activists to use Straight Identity Power to further some political ends, doing so is ultimately detrimental, as it necessarily reinforces heterosexist and patriarchal mores. Queer feminists should instead challenge core heterosexist ideals holistically, by employing Queer Identity Power. __________________________________________________________________ In her book, Epistemic Injustice, Miranda Fricker defines identity power as a “form of social power” which requires “imaginative social co-ordination” relating to social identity.1 Using a modified version of this concept, I will propose the concept of Straight Identity Power (SIP), or identity power which is available to certain people because of the perception that they are heterosexual and cisgender. I will demonstrate that access to SIP2 is contingent not on a stable sexual or gender identity, but on a person’s ability to perform cisheterosexuality in a given context. Although cautiously relying on SIP may aid some queer or feminist activists in achieving their most immediate political goals, doing so is necessarily detrimental to the advancement of gender equality. To oppose heteropatriarchy successfully, activists must target heteropatriarchal mores without relying on SIP. Part I. Terms SIP is social power which is available to a person because of the perception that they are heterosexual and cisgender. Rather than conferring any particular goods onto those who possess it, SIP grants a limited range of power to enforce cisheterosexual mores, and also to improve one’s own standing within a heterosexist framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Literary Modernism, Queer Theory, and the Trans Feminine Allegory
    UC Irvine FlashPoints Title The New Woman: Literary Modernism, Queer Theory, and the Trans Feminine Allegory Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/11z5g0mz ISBN 978081013 5550 Author Heaney, Emma Publication Date 2017-08-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The New Woman The FlashPoints series is devoted to books that consider literature beyond strictly national and disciplinary frameworks, and that are distinguished both by their historical grounding and by their theoretical and conceptual strength. Our books engage theory without losing touch with history and work historically without falling into uncritical positivism. FlashPoints aims for a broad audience within the humanities and the social sciences concerned with moments of cultural emergence and transformation. In a Benjaminian mode, FlashPoints is interested in how liter- ature contributes to forming new constellations of culture and history and in how such formations function critically and politically in the present. Series titles are available online at http://escholarship.org/uc/fl ashpoints. series editors: Ali Behdad (Comparative Literature and English, UCLA), Edi- tor Emeritus; Judith Butler (Rhetoric and Comparative Literature, UC Berkeley), Editor Emerita; Michelle Clayton (Hispanic Studies and Comparative Literature, Brown University); Edward Dimendberg (Film and Media Studies, Visual Studies, and European Languages and Studies, UC Irvine), Founding Editor; Catherine Gallagher (English, UC Berkeley), Editor Emerita; Nouri Gana (Comparative Lit- erature and Near Eastern Languages and Cultures, UCLA); Susan Gillman (Lit- erature, UC Santa Cruz), Coordinator; Jody Greene (Literature, UC Santa Cruz); Richard Terdiman (Literature, UC Santa Cruz), Founding Editor A complete list of titles begins on p.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT Rights, Homonationalisms, Europeanization and Post
    Old Ties and New Binds: LGBT Rights, Homonationalisms, Europeanization and Post- War Legacies in Serbia Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sonnet D’Amour Gabbard, B.A., M.A. Graduate Program in Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies The Ohio State University 2017 Dissertation Committee: Jennifer Anne Suchland, Advisor Christine Keating Shannon Winnubst Copyrighted by Sonnet D’Amour Gabbard 2017 Abstract My dissertation examines the historic links between the anti-war activists in Serbia with the current efforts and work for LGBT justice and rights. As an interdisciplinary scholar, my work integrates a variety of epistemologies across disciplines by putting anti-war and LGBT activists experience in Serbia into conversation with one another to address unique vulnerabilities. Drawing from transnational feminist and queer critiques of governance, (homo)nationalism, and transnational sexuality studies, I consider how new non- heterosexual identity politics—with roots in anti-war activism—have surfaced in Serbia since the Kosovo War. I argue that it is at the intersection of anti-war and LGBT organizing that new and conflicting identity politics have emerged, in part as a reaction to a pro-war hyper-nationalism and neoliberal globalization. ii Dedication I write this in memory of Jill Benderly, who taught me to be unapologetically me and to fight until my last breath for justice and peace. I love you. I miss you. iii Acknowledgments When I think about the scores of people, creatures, and plant life that have helped me arrive at this journey I am overwhelmed with emotion and humility.
    [Show full text]
  • Heteropatriarchy Kills: Challenging Gender Violence in a Prison Nation
    Washington University Journal of Law & Policy Volume 37 Access to Justice: Mass Incarceration and Masculinity Through a Black Feminist Lens January 2011 Heteropatriarchy Kills: Challenging Gender Violence in a Prison Nation Angela P. Harris University of California, Davis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation Angela P. Harris, Heteropatriarchy Kills: Challenging Gender Violence in a Prison Nation, 37 WASH. U. J. L. & POL’Y 13 (2011), https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol37/iss1/3 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Journal of Law & Policy by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Heteropatriarchy Kills: Challenging Gender Violence in a Prison Nation Angela P. Harris ABSTRACT We need an analysis that furthers neither the conservative project of sequestering millions of men of color in accordance with the contemporary dictates of globalized capital and its prison industrial complex, nor the equally conservative project of abandoning poor women of color to a continuum of violence that extends from the sweatshops through the prisons, to shelters, and into bedrooms at home. How do we develop analyses and organizing strategies against violence against women that acknowledge the race of gender and the gender of race?1 Professor of Law, University of California-Davis School of Law (King Hall).
    [Show full text]
  • Jim Crow Laws. in the Streets, Resistance Turned Violent
    TEACHING TEACHING The New Jim Crow TOLERANCE LESSON 4 A PROJECT OF THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER TOLERANCE.ORG Jim Crow as a Form of Racialized Social Control THE NEW JIM CROW by Michelle Alexander CHAPTER 1 The Rebirth of Caste The Birth of Jim Crow The backlash against the gains of African Americans in the Reconstruction Era was swift and severe. As African Americans obtained political power and began the long march to- ward greater social and economic equality, whites reacted with panic and outrage. South- ern conservatives vowed to reverse Reconstruction …. Their campaign to “re- deem” the South was reinforced by a resurgent Ku Klux Klan, which fought a BOOK terrorist campaign against Reconstruction governments and local leaders, EXCERPT complete with bombings, lynchings, and mob violence. The terrorist campaign proved highly successful. “Redemption” resulted in the withdrawal of federal troops from the South and the effective aban- donment of African Americans and all those who had fought for or supported an egalitarian racial order. The federal government no longer made any effort to enforce federal civil rights legislation … . Once again, vagrancy laws and other laws defining activities such as “mischief ” and “insult- ing gestures” as crimes were enforced vigorously against blacks. The aggressive enforce- ment of these criminal offenses opened up an enormous market for convict leasing, in Abridged excerpt which prisoners were contracted out as laborers to the highest private bidder. from The New Jim Crow: Mass Incar- Convicts had no meaningful legal rights at this time and no effective redress. They were ceration in the Age understood, quite literally, to be slaves of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Women's Work: Domestic Work, Class, Race, Heteropatriarchy, and the Limits of Legal Reform
    Michigan Journal of Race and Law Volume 16 2011 Some Women's Work: Domestic Work, Class, Race, Heteropatriarchy, and the Limits of Legal Reform Terri Nilliasca City University of New York School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, Law and Race Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Terri Nilliasca, Some Women's Work: Domestic Work, Class, Race, Heteropatriarchy, and the Limits of Legal Reform, 16 MICH. J. RACE & L. 377 (2011). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol16/iss2/1 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of Race and Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SOME WOMEN'S WORK: DOMESTIC WORK, CLASS, RACE, HETEROPATRIARCHY, AND THE LIMITS OF LEGAL REFORM Terri Nilliasca* This Note employs Critical Race, feminist, Marxist, and queer theory to analyze the underlying reasons for the exclusion of domes- tic workers from legal and regulatory systems. The Note begins with a discussion of the role of legal and regulatory systems in upholding and replicating White supremacy within the employer and domestic worker relationship.The Note then goes on to argue that the 1hite, feminist movement's emphasis on access to wage laborfurther subju- gated Black and immigrant domestic workers. Finally, I end with an in-depth legal analysis of New York's Domestic Worker Bill of Rights, the nation's first state law to specifically extend legal protec- tions to domestic workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery As a Form of Racialized Social Control
    TEACHING TEACHING The New Jim Crow TOLERANCE LESSON 3 A PROJECT OF THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER TOLERANCE.ORG Slavery as a Form of Racialized Social Control THE NEW JIM CROW by Michelle Alexander CHAPTER 1 The Rebirth of Caste The Birth of Slavery The concept of race is a relatively recent development. Only in the past few centuries, ow- ing largely to European imperialism, have the world’s people been classified along racial lines.1 Here, in America, the idea of race emerged as a means of reconciling chattel slavery— as well as the extermination of American Indians—with the ideals of freedom preached by whites in the new colonies. BOOK In the early colonial period, when settlements remained relatively small, EXCERPT indentured servitude was the dominant means of securing cheap labor. Under this system, whites and blacks struggled to survive against a com- mon enemy, what historian Lerone Bennett Jr. describes as “the big planter apparatus and a social system that legalized terror against black and white bonds-men.”2 Initially, blacks brought to this country were not all enslaved; many were treated as indentured servants. As plantation farming expanded, particularly tobacco and cotton farming, demand increased greatly for both labor and land. The demand for land was met by invading and conquering larger and larger swaths of terri- tory [held by American Indians]. Abridged excerpt from The New Jim The growing demand for labor on plantations was met through slavery. American Indians Crow: Mass Incar- were considered unsuitable as slaves, largely because native tribes were clearly in a posi- ceration in the Age tion to fight back.
    [Show full text]