DOCSLIB.ORG

Information Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Information Management Plan Southern California Bight 2008 Regional Monitoring Survey (Bight’08) Information Management Plan Prepared by: Bight’08 Information Management Committee Prepared for: Commission of Southern California Coastal Water Research Project 3535 Harbor Blvd., Suite 110 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Version Date: July 30, 2008 Bight 08 Information Management Plan Disclaimer: While we strive to make the Information Management Plan as accurate as possible when we publish it, there may be times at which we may find it necessary to make some minor changes. Please check the data submission website at www.sccwrp.org\datasubmission\bight08 for the most current version of the Information Management Plan and most current values in a given lookup list. If a value seems appropriate for a field but is not listed, please contact the Information Management Officer to discuss its inclusion. 2 Bight 08 Information Management Plan INFORMATION MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT CHAIR: Shelly Moore Southern California Coastal Water Research Project INFORMATION MANAGEMENT CO-CHAIRS Shelly Walther Los Angeles County Sanitation District Lisa Haney Los Angeles County Sanitation District INFORMATION MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Bruce Bealer Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Cheryl Brantley Los Angeles County Sanitation District Curtis Cash City of LA, Environmental Monitoring Division Susan Chang City of LA, Environmental Monitoring Division Larry Cooper Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Andrea Crumpacker Weston Solutions Mike Mengel Orange County Sanitation District Hai Nguyen Orange County Sanitation District Diane O’Donohue City of San Diego, Metropolitan Wastewater Department Chi-Li Tang Los Angeles County Sanitation District Karin Wisenbaker Aquatic Bioassay Consultants ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The Information Management Committee wishes to thank those members of the Field Methods, Chemistry and Toxicity Committees that participated in collaborative process essential to the creation of the Bight’08 Information Management Plan. In particular, we wish to thank Mike Kelly, Darrin Greenstein, Keith Maruya, Rich Gossett, Michael Hoxsey, Lee King, Brent Bowman, Lisa Sabin, Will McCully, Janice Chen, Vanh Phonsir and Valerie Raco-Rands. 3 Bight 08 Information Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION TO BIGHT‘08 ................................................................................ 7 II. APPROACH TO INFORMATION MANAGEMENT .................................................. 8 A. STANDARDIZED DATA TRANSFER PROTOCOLS .......................................................... 9 B. FIELD COMPUTER .................................................................................................. 11 III. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ......................................................................... 12 A. INFORMATION MANAGEMENT OFFICER (IMO) ............................................................ 12 B. AGENCY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (AIM) CONTACT INFORMATION ........................ 13 C. DATA FLOW ........................................................................................................... 13 D. DATA REVISION ..................................................................................................... 15 E. SCHEDULE ............................................................................................................. 15 IV. SUBMISSION GUIDELINES ................................................................................... 16 A. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................. 16 B. HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT ............................................................................... 17 C. DATA SUBMISSION PROTOCOLS .............................................................................. 18 D. DATA ENTRY TEMPLATES ....................................................................................... 19 V. DATA ACCESS ...................................................................................................... 19 A. DATA RELEASE PHILOSOPHY ................................................................................. 19 B. METADATA ............................................................................................................ 20 V. DATA TABLES ....................................................................................................... 20 A. COMMON TABLES .................................................................................................. 21 tblStations ............................................................................................................ 21 tblStationOccupation ........................................................................................... 22 B. COASTAL ECOLOGY ............................................................................................... 24 tblSedimentGrabEvent ........................................................................................ 24 tblChemistryBatchData ........................................................................................ 26 tblChemistryResults ............................................................................................. 27 tblInfaunalAbundance .......................................................................................... 31 tblToxicityBatchInformation ................................................................................. 33 tblToxicityResults ................................................................................................. 34 tblToxicityWQ ....................................................................................................... 35 tblToxicitySummaryResults ................................................................................. 36 tblTrawlAssemblageEvent ................................................................................... 37 tblArchivalDataTag .............................................................................................. 40 tblTrawlDebris ...................................................................................................... 41 tblTrawlFishAbundance ....................................................................................... 42 tblTrawlFishBiomass ............................................................................................ 44 tblTrawlInvertebrateAbundance ........................................................................... 45 tblTrawlInvertebrateBiomass ............................................................................... 46 B. ROCKY HABITAT .................................................................................................... 47 tblDiveEvent ........................................................................................................ 47 tblDiveFishAbundance ......................................................................................... 49 tblDiveUniformPointContact ................................................................................ 51 tblDiveSwath ........................................................................................................ 52 tblDiveUrchins...................................................................................................... 53 APPENDIX 1. LOOKUP LISTS ...................................................................................... 55 4 Bight 08 Information Management Plan luList01_AgencyCodes ........................................................................................ 55 luList02_CTDMethodCodes ................................................................................ 56 luList03_EquipmentCodes ................................................................................... 56 luList04_SampleTypes ........................................................................................ 57 luList05_OrdinalDirections ................................................................................... 57 luList06_SedimentCompositionCodes ................................................................. 58 luList07_OdorCodes ............................................................................................ 58 luList08_WeatherCodes ...................................................................................... 58 luList09_SpeciesList ............................................................................................ 59 luList10_TissueTypes .......................................................................................... 77 luList11_QualifierCodes ...................................................................................... 77 luList12_SizeDescriptors ..................................................................................... 78 luList13_TidalStage ............................................................................................. 78 luList14_TestMatrices .......................................................................................... 78 luList15_ParameterCodes ................................................................................... 78 luList16_SeaStates .............................................................................................. 83 luList17_MeasurementBasisCodes ..................................................................... 83 luList18_SedimentColors ..................................................................................... 83 luList19_CurrentDirections .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ascidian Cannibalism Correlates with Larval Behavior and Adult Distribution
    FAU Institutional Repository http://purl.fcla.edu/fau/fauir This paper was submitted by the faculty of FAU’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute. Notice: ©1988 Elsevier Ltd. The final published version of this manuscript is available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00220981 and may be cited as: Young, C. M. (1988). Ascidian cannibalism correlates with larval behavior and adult distribution. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 117(1), 9-26. doi:10.1016/0022-0981(88)90068-8 J. Exp. Mar. Bioi. £Col., 1988, Vol. 117, pp. 9-26 9 Elsevier JEM 01042 Ascidian cannibalism correlates with larval behavior and adult distribution Craig M. Young Department ofLarval Ecology. Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution, Fort Pierce, Florida. U.S.A. (Received 24 March 1987; revision received 9 December 1987; accepted 22 December 1987) Abstract: In the San Juan Islands, Washington, solitary ascidians .that occur in dense monospecific aggregations demonstrate gregarious settlement as larvae, whereas species that occur as isolated individuals do not. All gregarious species reject their own eggs and larvae as food, but nongregarious species consume conspecific eggs and larvae. Moreover, the rejection mechanism is species-specific in some cases. Correla­ tion analysis suggests that species specificity of the rejection response has a basis in siphon diameter, egg density, and larval size, but not in number of oral tentacles, or tentacle branching. One strongly cannibalistic species, Corella inflata Huntsman, avoids consuming its own eggs and newly released tadpoles by a unique brooding mechanism that involves floating eggs, negative geotaxis after hatching, and adult orientation. Key words: Ascidian; Cannibalism; Distribution; Larva; Settlement behavior INTRODUCTION Many sessile marine invertebrates, including filter-feeders such as mussels, oysters, barnacles and ascidians, occur in discrete, dense aggregations.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST and BIOGEOGRAPHY of FISHES from GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor Reyes-Bonilla, Arturo Ayala-Bocos, Luis E
    ReyeS-BONIllA eT Al: CheCklIST AND BIOgeOgRAphy Of fISheS fROm gUADAlUpe ISlAND CalCOfI Rep., Vol. 51, 2010 CHECKLIST AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF FISHES FROM GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor REyES-BONILLA, Arturo AyALA-BOCOS, LUIS E. Calderon-AGUILERA SAúL GONzáLEz-Romero, ISRAEL SáNCHEz-ALCántara Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada AND MARIANA Walther MENDOzA Carretera Tijuana - Ensenada # 3918, zona Playitas, C.P. 22860 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur Ensenada, B.C., México Departamento de Biología Marina Tel: +52 646 1750500, ext. 25257; Fax: +52 646 Apartado postal 19-B, CP 23080 [email protected] La Paz, B.C.S., México. Tel: (612) 123-8800, ext. 4160; Fax: (612) 123-8819 NADIA C. Olivares-BAñUELOS [email protected] Reserva de la Biosfera Isla Guadalupe Comisión Nacional de áreas Naturales Protegidas yULIANA R. BEDOLLA-GUzMáN AND Avenida del Puerto 375, local 30 Arturo RAMíREz-VALDEz Fraccionamiento Playas de Ensenada, C.P. 22880 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Ensenada, B.C., México Facultad de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Carr. Tijuana-Ensenada km. 107, Apartado postal 453, C.P. 22890 Ensenada, B.C., México ABSTRACT recognized the biological and ecological significance of Guadalupe Island, off Baja California, México, is Guadalupe Island, and declared it a Biosphere Reserve an important fishing area which also harbors high (SEMARNAT 2005). marine biodiversity. Based on field data, literature Guadalupe Island is isolated, far away from the main- reviews, and scientific collection records, we pres- land and has limited logistic facilities to conduct scien- ent a comprehensive checklist of the local fish fauna, tific studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental DNA Reveals the Fine-Grained and Hierarchical
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Environmental DNA reveals the fne‑grained and hierarchical spatial structure of kelp forest fsh communities Thomas Lamy 1,2*, Kathleen J. Pitz 3, Francisco P. Chavez3, Christie E. Yorke1 & Robert J. Miller1 Biodiversity is changing at an accelerating rate at both local and regional scales. Beta diversity, which quantifes species turnover between these two scales, is emerging as a key driver of ecosystem function that can inform spatial conservation. Yet measuring biodiversity remains a major challenge, especially in aquatic ecosystems. Decoding environmental DNA (eDNA) left behind by organisms ofers the possibility of detecting species sans direct observation, a Rosetta Stone for biodiversity. While eDNA has proven useful to illuminate diversity in aquatic ecosystems, its utility for measuring beta diversity over spatial scales small enough to be relevant to conservation purposes is poorly known. Here we tested how eDNA performs relative to underwater visual census (UVC) to evaluate beta diversity of marine communities. We paired UVC with 12S eDNA metabarcoding and used a spatially structured hierarchical sampling design to assess key spatial metrics of fsh communities on temperate rocky reefs in southern California. eDNA provided a more‑detailed picture of the main sources of spatial variation in both taxonomic richness and community turnover, which primarily arose due to strong species fltering within and among rocky reefs. As expected, eDNA detected more taxa at the regional scale (69 vs. 38) which accumulated quickly with space and plateaued at only ~ 11 samples. Conversely, the discovery rate of new taxa was slower with no sign of saturation for UVC.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTIOXIDANT CAPACITY in the HEMOLYMPH of the MARINE ISOPOD PENTIDOTEA RESECATA by Leah E. Dann a THESIS Submitted to WALLA WALL
    ANTIOXIDANT CAPACITY IN THE HEMOLYMPH OF THE MARINE ISOPOD PENTIDOTEA RESECATA By Leah E. Dann A THESIS submitted to WALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE April 26, 2017 ABSTRACT The isopod Pentidotea resecata inhabits Zostera marina eelgrass beds. Examination of oxygen levels in a Z. marina bed indicated that P. resecata frequently experience hyperoxia and potential hypoxia reperfusion events in these beds, which may lead to enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and increased oxidative damage if the antioxidant defenses cannot sufficiently suppress these toxic oxygen intermediates. The total antioxidant capacity of P. resecata hemolymph was compared to that of Ligia pallasii, a semi-terrestrial isopod living in normoxic conditions, and to that of Pandalus danae, a shrimp that lives below the photic zone. The hypothesis was that P. resecata hemolymph would have stronger antioxidant defenses than the other crustaceans because this isopod faces a more hostile oxygen environment. LCMS analysis of P. resecata hemolymph confirmed the presence of antioxidants including pheophorbide a, lutein, and β-carotene, while L. pallasii hemolymph contained pheophorbide a and lutein but no β-carotene. Pandalus danae hemolymph had no carotenoids or pheophorbide. Although L. pallasii hemolymph was missing β-carotene, it had a significantly higher total antioxidant capacity than that of P. resecata. Hemolymph from P. danae had an intermediate antioxidant capacity even though it contained none of the antioxidants detected in the other species. The unexpected antioxidant activities among the species could be explained by differences in metabolic functions or environmental factors that were not examined in this study; or perhaps P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ascidian Styela Plicata As a Potential Bioremediator of Bacterial and Algal Contamination of Marine Estuarine Waters
    THE ASCIDIAN STYELA PLICATA AS A POTENTIAL BIOREMEDIATOR OF BACTERIAL AND ALGAL CONTAMINATION OF MARINE ESTUARINE WATERS by Lisa Denham Draughon A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Charles E. Schmidt College of Science In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, Florida May, 2010 Copyright by Lisa Denham Draughon 2010 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my sincerest gratitude to those who made this research possible; Ocean Restoration Corporation Associates (ORCA), the Link Foundation, and Florida Atlantic University (FAU) for their financial fellowships, and for the many hands that played a part in getting it all done. A special thank you goes to my committee members; Dr. James X. Hartmann (chairperson) and Dr. David Binninger of FAU, Dr. Ed Proffitt and Dr. John Scarpa of Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute at FAU, and Dr. Ray Waldner of Palm Beach Atlantic University. You were all such an integral part of helping me achieve this goal. Special thanks also go to my friend Karen Halloway- Adkins who was always willing to help locate specimens and provide equipment when she had it. Mike Calinski of ORCA made trips from the Gulf Coast to deliver specimens to me. Sherry Reed of the Smithsonian Marine Station in Ft. Pierce was extremely helpful by keeping an eye out for the tunicates and at times gathering them for me. Dr. Patricia Keating was invaluable for her help in flow-cytometry analysis. Dr. Peter McCarthy of Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute at FAU provided the bacteria for the filtration rate experiment.
    [Show full text]
  • DOGAMI Open-File Report O-86-06, the State of Scientific
    "ABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ..~**********..~...~*~~.~...~~~~1 GORDA RIDGE LEASE AREA ....................... 2 RELATED STUDIES IN THE NORTH PACIFIC .+,...,. 5 BYDROTHERMAL TEXTS ........................... 9 34T.4 GAPS ................................... r6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................. I8 APPENDIX 1. Species found on the Gorda Ridge or within the lease area . .. .. .. .. .. 36 RPPENDiX 2. Species found outside the lease area that may occur in the Gorda Ridge Lease area, including hydrothermal vent organisms .................................55 BENTHOS THE STATE OF SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION RELATING TO THE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY 3F THE GOUDA RIDGE STUDY AREA, NORTZEAST PACIFIC OCEAN: INTRODUCTION Presently, only two published studies discuss the ecology of benthic animals on the Gorda Sidge. Fowler and Kulm (19701, in a predominantly geolgg isal study, used the presence of sublittor31 and planktsnic foraminiferans as an indication of uplift of tfie deep-sea fioor. Their resuits showed tiac sedinenta ana foraminiferans are depositea in the Zscanaba Trough, in the southern part of the Corda Ridge, by turbidity currents with a continental origin. They list 22 species of fararniniferans from the Gorda Rise (See Appendix 13. A more recent study collected geophysical, geological, and biological data from the Gorda Ridge, with particular emphasis on the northern part of the Ridge (Clague et al. 19843. Geological data suggest the presence of widespread low-temperature hydrothermal activity along the axf s of the northern two-thirds of the Corda 3idge. However, the relative age of these vents, their present activity and presence of sulfide deposits are currently unknown. The biological data, again with an emphasis on foraminiferans, indicate relatively high species diversity and high density , perhaps assoc iated with widespread hydrotheraal activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Foregut Anatomy of the Cochlespirinae (Gastropoda, Conoidea, Turridae)
    Foregut anatomy of the Cochlespirinae (Gastropoda, Conoidea, Turridae) Alexandra I. MEDINSKAYA A. N. Severtzov Institute of Problems of Evolution, Leninsky Prospect 33, Moscow 117071 (Russia) Medinskaya A. I. 1999. — Foregut anatomy of the Cochlespirinae (Gastropoda. Conoidea. Turridae). Zoosystema2\ (2): 171-198. ABSTRACT The foregut anatomy of 20 species, belonging to eight genera, of the sub­ family Cochlespirinae is described. A cladistic analysis based on several most important characters (morphology of proboscis, position of buccal sphinc­ ters, histology of venom gland, position of the venom gland opening, struc­ ture of muscular bulb, and morphology of radular teeth) revealed three more or less well-defined groups within the subfamily. The main feature characte­ rizing the subfamily as a whole and separating groups within it, appeared to be the structure of venom gland and its muscular bulb. The subgenus KEYWORDS Cochlespirinae, Sibogasyrinx of the genus Leucosyrinx was shown to deserve a genus status. Conoidea, Some genera appeared to be intermediate between Cochlespirinae and anatomy, foregut, Crassispirinae in some anatomical characters, and their taxonomic position histology. remains not completely clear. RESUME L'anatomie du système digestif des Cochlespirinae (Gastropoda, Conoidea, Turridae). L'anatomie du système digestif de 20 espèces, appartenant à huit genres de la sous-famille Cochlespirinae, est étudiée. Une analyse cladistique, fondée sur les plus importants caractères de ce groupe (la morphologie de la trompe, la disposition des sphincters, l'histologie de la glande à venin, la disposition de l'ouverture de la glande à venin, la structure de la poire musculaire et la mor­ phologie des dents de la radula) a permis de distinguet trois groupes plus ou moins homogènes.
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title A historical perspective of California recreational fisheries using a new database of "trophy" fish records (1966-2013), combined with fisheries analyses of three species in the genus Paralabrax Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1g40s1h0 Author Bellquist, Lyall F. Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO A historical perspective of California recreational fisheries using a new database of “trophy” fish records (1966-2013), combined with fisheries analyses of three species in the genus Paralabrax A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Biology by Lyall F. Bellquist Committee in charge: Brice Semmens, Chair Richard Carson David Checkley Philip Hastings Ed Parnell 2015 Copyright Lyall F. Bellquist, 2015 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Lyall F. Bellquist is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C - Invertebrate Population Attributes
    APPENDIX C - INVERTEBRATE POPULATION ATTRIBUTES C1. Taxonomic list of megabenthic invertebrate species collected C2. Percent area of megabenthic invertebrate species by subpopulation C3. Abundance of megabenthic invertebrate species by subpopulation C4. Biomass of megabenthic invertebrate species by subpopulation C- 1 C1. Taxonomic list of megabenthic invertebrate species collected on the southern California shelf and upper slope at depths of 2-476m, July-October 2003. Taxon/Species Author Common Name PORIFERA CALCEREA --SCYCETTIDA Amphoriscidae Leucilla nuttingi (Urban 1902) urn sponge HEXACTINELLIDA --HEXACTINOSA Aphrocallistidae Aphrocallistes vastus Schulze 1887 cloud sponge DEMOSPONGIAE Porifera sp SD2 "sponge" Porifera sp SD4 "sponge" Porifera sp SD5 "sponge" Porifera sp SD15 "sponge" Porifera sp SD16 "sponge" --SPIROPHORIDA Tetillidae Tetilla arb de Laubenfels 1930 gray puffball sponge --HADROMERIDA Suberitidae Suberites suberea (Johnson 1842) hermitcrab sponge Tethyidae Tethya californiana (= aurantium ) de Laubenfels 1932 orange ball sponge CNIDARIA HYDROZOA --ATHECATAE Tubulariidae Tubularia crocea (L. Agassiz 1862) pink-mouth hydroid --THECATAE Aglaopheniidae Aglaophenia sp "hydroid" Plumulariidae Plumularia sp "seabristle" Sertulariidae Abietinaria sp "hydroid" --SIPHONOPHORA Rhodaliidae Dromalia alexandri Bigelow 1911 sea dandelion ANTHOZOA --ALCYONACEA Clavulariidae Telesto californica Kükenthal 1913 "soft coral" Telesto nuttingi Kükenthal 1913 "anemone" Gorgoniidae Adelogorgia phyllosclera Bayer 1958 orange gorgonian Eugorgia
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Trade in Marine Ornamental Species
    From Ocean to Aquarium The global trade in marine ornamental species Colette Wabnitz, Michelle Taylor, Edmund Green and Tries Razak From Ocean to Aquarium The global trade in marine ornamental species Colette Wabnitz, Michelle Taylor, Edmund Green and Tries Razak ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS UNEP World Conservation This report would not have been The authors would like to thank Helen Monitoring Centre possible without the participation of Corrigan for her help with the analyses 219 Huntingdon Road many colleagues from the Marine of CITES data, and Sarah Ferriss for Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK Aquarium Council, particularly assisting in assembling information Tel: +44 (0) 1223 277314 Aquilino A. Alvarez, Paul Holthus and and analysing Annex D and GMAD data Fax: +44 (0) 1223 277136 Peter Scott, and all trading companies on Hippocampus spp. We are grateful E-mail: [email protected] who made data available to us for to Neville Ash for reviewing and editing Website: www.unep-wcmc.org inclusion into GMAD. The kind earlier versions of the manuscript. Director: Mark Collins assistance of Akbar, John Brandt, Thanks also for additional John Caldwell, Lucy Conway, Emily comments to Katharina Fabricius, THE UNEP WORLD CONSERVATION Corcoran, Keith Davenport, John Daphné Fautin, Bert Hoeksema, Caroline MONITORING CENTRE is the biodiversity Dawes, MM Faugère et Gavand, Cédric Raymakers and Charles Veron; for assessment and policy implemen- Genevois, Thomas Jung, Peter Karn, providing reprints, to Alan Friedlander, tation arm of the United Nations Firoze Nathani, Manfred Menzel, Julie Hawkins, Sherry Larkin and Tom Environment Programme (UNEP), the Davide di Mohtarami, Edward Molou, Ogawa; and for providing the picture on world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings for 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California
    UC San Diego Fish Bulletin Title Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93g734v0 Authors Pinkas, Leo Gates, Doyle E Frey, Herbert W Publication Date 1974 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 161 California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California By Leo Pinkas Marine Resources Region and By Doyle E. Gates and Herbert W. Frey > Marine Resources Region 1974 1 Figure 1. Geographical areas used to summarize California Fisheries statistics. 2 3 1. CALIFORNIA MARINE FISH LANDINGS FOR 1972 LEO PINKAS Marine Resources Region 1.1. INTRODUCTION The protection, propagation, and wise utilization of California's living marine resources (established as common property by statute, Section 1600, Fish and Game Code) is dependent upon the welding of biological, environment- al, economic, and sociological factors. Fundamental to each of these factors, as well as the entire management pro- cess, are harvest records. The California Department of Fish and Game began gathering commercial fisheries land- ing data in 1916. Commercial fish catches were first published in 1929 for the years 1926 and 1927. This report, the 32nd in the landing series, is for the calendar year 1972. It summarizes commercial fishing activities in marine as well as fresh waters and includes the catches of the sportfishing partyboat fleet. Preliminary landing data are published annually in the circular series which also enumerates certain fishery products produced from the catch.
    [Show full text]