DOCSLIB.ORG

Mkango Resources Limited Songwe REE Project Malawi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mkango Resources Limited Songwe REE Project Malawi Mkango Resources Limited Songwe REE Project Malawi NI 43-101 Pre-feasibility Report Prepared By The MSA Group (Pty) Ltd for: Mkango Resources Limited Prepared By: Rob Croll Fellow SAIMM Scott Swinden P.Geo Michael Hall Pr. Sci.Nat., MAusIMM Clive Brown Pr.Eng., Fellow SAIMM Gavin Beer (Ext.Met) MAusIMM (CP) Jansen Scheepers Pr.Eng. Tinus Redelinghuys Pr.Eng. Guy Wild Pr.Eng Graham Errol Trusler P.Eng Effective Date: 19 September 2014 Report Date: 06 November 2014 MSA Project No.: J2897 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Property Description and Location ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 History and Ownership ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Geology and Mineralization .................................................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Status of Exploration................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.5 Mineral Resources ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.6 Mineral Reserves ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.7 Mining ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.8 Process Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.8.1 Processing plant capital cost estimate ........................................................................................... 10 1.8.2 Processing plant operating cost estimate .................................................................................... 10 1.9 Tailings ........................................................................................................................................................................ 11 1.10 Environmental Aspects ......................................................................................................................................... 14 1.10.1 Legal framework ..................................................................................................................................... 14 1.10.2 Potential environmental risks ............................................................................................................ 15 1.11 Market Studies and Contracts............................................................................................................................ 16 1.12 Capital and Operating Cost Estimates ............................................................................................................ 18 1.12.1 Capital Costs ............................................................................................................................................. 18 1.12.2 Operating Costs ...................................................................................................................................... 19 1.13 Financial Valuation ................................................................................................................................................. 19 2 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 23 2.1 Scope of Work .......................................................................................................................................................... 23 2.2 Principal Sources of Information ...................................................................................................................... 23 2.3 Qualifications, Experience and Independence ............................................................................................ 23 3 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS .......................................................................................................... 25 4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ...................................................................................... 26 4.1 Location ...................................................................................................................................................................... 26 4.2 Mineral Tenure, Permitting, Rights and Agreements ............................................................................... 28 4.2.1 Exclusive Prospecting Licenses in Malawi ..................................................................................... 28 4.2.2 EPL 0284/10R Phalombe ...................................................................................................................... 28 4.2.3 General Provisions .................................................................................................................................. 30 J2897 Mkango Songwe Hill PFS November 2014 Page: ii 4.2.4 Overlapping EPLs .................................................................................................................................... 31 4.3 Environmental Liabilities ...................................................................................................................................... 31 5 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY ...... 33 5.1 Accessibility ............................................................................................................................................................... 33 5.2 Climate and Physiography................................................................................................................................... 34 5.2.1 Climate and meteorological Overview ........................................................................................... 34 5.2.2 Physiography ............................................................................................................................................ 42 5.3 Local Resources and Infrastructure .................................................................................................................. 43 6 HISTORY................................................................................................................................................. 45 6.1 Ownership History .................................................................................................................................................. 45 6.2 Historical Exploration ............................................................................................................................................ 45 6.2.1 Pre-1981 Programmes .......................................................................................................................... 45 6.2.2 Post-1981 Programmes ....................................................................................................................... 46 6.2.3 Japan International Cooperation Agency and Metal Mining Agency of Japan, 1986 - 1988 .......................................................................................................................................................... 46 7 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION .............................................................................. 52 7.1 Regional Geology.................................................................................................................................................... 52 7.2 Geology of the Songwe Carbonatite Vent .................................................................................................... 54 7.2.1 Carbonatite ............................................................................................................................................... 54 7.2.2 Fenite ........................................................................................................................................................... 57 7.2.3 Breccia ......................................................................................................................................................... 57 7.2.4 Silicate-rich dykes ................................................................................................................................... 58 7.3 Mineralization ........................................................................................................................................................... 58 7.3.1 Geological domains ............................................................................................................................... 58 7.3.2 Geometry of the Mineralization ........................................................................................................ 64 7.3.3 Thorium ...................................................................................................................................................... 66 7.3.4 Mineralogy ...............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Feldspar and Nepheline Syenite 2016
    2016 Minerals Yearbook FELDSPAR AND NEPHELINE SYENITE [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior January 2020 U.S. Geological Survey Feldspar and Nepheline Syenite By Arnold O. Tanner Domestic survey data and tables were prepared by Raymond I. Eldridge III, statistical assistant. In 2016, feldspar production in the United States was representing 46% of the 2016 production tonnages listed in estimated to be 470,000 metric tons (t) valued at $33.1 million, tables 1 and 2. an almost 10% decrease in quantity and a 11% decrease in Feldspar was mined in six States (table 3). North Carolina value compared with 2015 (table 1). Exports of feldspar in 2016 was by far the leading producer State; the remaining five were, decreased by 61% to 5,890 t, valued at $1.5 million, and imports in descending order of estimated output, Virginia, California, of feldspar decreased by 69% to 36,900 t, valued at $3.4 million. Idaho, Oklahoma, and South Dakota. Production was from Imports of nepheline syenite (predominantly from Canada) 10 mines and beneficiating facilities—4 in North Carolina, 2 in increased by 27% to about 572,000 t valued at $73 million. California, and 1 in each of the 4 remaining States (table 3). World production of feldspar in 2016 was 23.4 million metric I-Minerals Inc. continued the mine permitting process for tons (Mt) (tables 1, 7). its Helmer-Bovill project in north-central Idaho; the mine Feldspars, which constitute about 60% of the earth’s crust, would produce potassium feldspar, halloysite, kaolin, and are anhydrous aluminosilicate minerals of two main groupings: quartz.
    [Show full text]
  • NI 43-101 Songwe REE Deposit
    NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate for the Songwe Hill Rare Earth Element (REE) Project, Phalombe District, Republic of Malawi Prepared by The MSA Group (Pty) Ltd for: Mkango Resources Ltd Authors: Scott Swinden Consulting Geologist Ph.D., P.Geo. Michael Hall Consulting Geologist Resources Pr.Sci.Nat., MAusIMM Effective Date: September 30, 2012 Date of Signature: November 22, 2012 Table of Contents 1 Summary......................................................................................................................................... viii 1.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................viii 1.2 Property, Location and Ownership.........................................................................................viii 1.3 Geology and Mineralization....................................................................................................viii 1.4 Status of Exploration ................................................................................................................ix 1.5 Mineral Resources.................................................................................................................... x 1.6 Conclusions and Recommendations........................................................................................xi 2 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Scope of Work
    [Show full text]
  • Alkaline Magmas in Zones of Continental Convergence
    1 Alkaline magmas in zones of continental convergence: 2 The Tezhsar volcano-intrusive ring complex, Armenia 3 4 Krzysztof Sokół1,2, Ralf Halama1*, Khachatur Meliksetian3, Ivan 5 P. Savov4, Gevorg Navasardyan3, Masafumi Sudo5 6 7 1 School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG, 8 United Kingdom 9 2 (Present address) School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of St Andrews, 10 St Andrews, KY16 9AL, United Kingdom 11 3 Institute of Geological Sciences, Armenian National Academy of Sciences, 24a Marshal 12 Baghramian Avenue, 0019, Yerevan, Republic of Armenia 13 4 School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom 14 5 Institute of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht- 15 Str. 24-25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany 16 17 * Corresponding author contact information: 18 Ralf Halama 19 School of Geography, Geology and the Environment 20 Keele University 21 Keele, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom 22 E-mail: [email protected] 23 Phone: +44 (0) 1782 7 34960 1 24 Abstract 25 Alkaline igneous rocks are relatively rare in settings of tectonic convergence and little 26 is known about their petrogenesis in these settings. This study aims to contribute to a 27 better understanding of the formation of alkaline igneous rocks by an investigation of the 28 Tezhsar volcano-intrusive alkaline ring complex (TAC) in the Armenian Lesser Caucasus, 29 which is located between the converging Eurasian and Arabian plates. We present new 30 petrological, geochemical and Sr-Nd isotope data for the TAC to constrain magma genesis 31 and magma source characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Production, Reserves, and Processing of Feldspar and Feldspathoid Rocks in the Czech Republic from 2005 to 2019—An Overview
    minerals Article Production, Reserves, and Processing of Feldspar and Feldspathoid Rocks in the Czech Republic from 2005 to 2019—An Overview Jan Zahradník 1,2 , Jakub Jirásek 3,*, Jaromír Starý 4 and Martin Sivek 2 1 LB MINERALS, s.r.o., Tovární 431, 330 12 Horní Bˇríza, Czech Republic; [email protected] 2 Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Mining and Geology, Vysoká Škola Báˇnská-Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 15/2172, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic; [email protected] 3 Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Palacký University Olomouc, 17. listopadu 1192/12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic 4 Czech Geological Survey, Klárov 3, 118 21 Praha, Czech Republic; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 5 July 2020; Accepted: 10 August 2020; Published: 17 August 2020 Abstract: This paper aims to characterize and interpret the trends in reserves, resources, and mine production of feldspar and feldspathoid rocks during 2005–2019 in the Czech Republic. With over 101 Mt of total resources and 22 Mt of reserves, feldspar belongs to the crucial industrial minerals of the Czech Republic. With annual outputs of approximately 400–450 kt of feldspars and 20–35 kt of feldspathoid rocks (nepheline syenite), the Czech Republic ranks among the top European and world feldspar producers. Most of the production comes from leucocratic granitoid rocks (key active deposit: Krásno-Vysoký Kámen), followed by sedimentary rocks (key active deposit: Halámky), and granitic pegmatites (key active deposit: Luženiˇcky).Nepheline syenite is mined at a single deposit. All deposits are extracted from open pits (quarries).
    [Show full text]
  • Alkaline Rock Complexes in the Wet Mountains Area, Custer and Fremont Counties, Colorado
    Alkaline Rock Complexes in the Wet Mountains Area, Custer and Fremont Counties, Colorado GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1269 Alkaline Rock Complexes in the Wet Mountains Area, Custer and Fremont Counties, Colorado By THEODORE J. ARMBRUSTMACHER GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1269 Geology and petrology of rocks of the McClure Mountain Complex, Gem Park Complex, and complex at Democrat Creek and associated alkaline rocks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Armbrustmacher, Theodore J., 1946- Alkaline Rock complexes in the Wet Mountains area, Custer and Fremont Counties, Colorado. (Geological Survey Professional Paper 1269) Bibliography: 33 p. Supt. of Docs. No.: 119.16:1269 1. Alkalic igneous rocks. 2. Petrology Colorado Wet Mountains. I. Title. II. Series. QE462.A4A76 552'.3 82-600104 AACR2 CONTENTS Abstract ............................. 1 Ages of the complexes ..................... 14 Introduction ........................... 1 Geochemistry ........................... 15 Acknowledgments ........................ 1 Major elements ....................... 15 Geologic setting ......................... 2 Mafic-ultramafic rocks ................. 15 McClure Mountain Complex .................. 2 Leucocratic rocks ................... 16 Mafic-ultramafic rocks ................... 2 Mafic nepheline-clinopyroxene rocks ......... 19 Layered series ....................
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Tables for Common Minerals in Thin Section
    Identification Tables for Common Minerals in Thin Section These tables provide a concise summary of the properties of a range of common minerals. Within the tables, minerals are arranged by colour so as to help with identification. If a mineral commonly has a range of colours, it will appear once for each colour. To identify an unknown mineral, start by answering the following questions: (1) What colour is the mineral? (2) What is the relief of the mineral? (3) Do you think you are looking at an igneous, metamorphic or sedimentary rock? Go to the chart, and scan the properties. Within each colour group, minerals are arranged in order of increasing refractive index (which more or less corresponds to relief). This should at once limit you to only a few minerals. By looking at the chart, see which properties might help you distinguish between the possibilities. Then, look at the mineral again, and check these further details. Notes: (i) Name: names listed here may be strict mineral names (e.g., andalusite), or group names (e.g., chlorite), or distinctive variety names (e.g., titanian augite). These tables contain a personal selection of some of the more common minerals. Remember that there are nearly 4000 minerals, although 95% of these are rare or very rare. The minerals in here probably make up 95% of medium and coarse-grained rocks in the crust. (ii) IMS: this gives a simple assessment of whether the mineral is common in igneous (I), metamorphic (M) or sedimentary (S) rocks. These are not infallible guides - in particular many igneous and metamorphic minerals can occur occasionally in sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRUSIVE IGNEOUS ROCKS, PART 3 (And Friends)
    GLY 4310C LAB 8 INTRUSIVE IGNEOUS ROCKS, PART 3 (and friends) Syenite, Phonolite, Ijolite, Carbonatite, Ultramafic Rocks and Lamprophyre These intrusive rocks correspond to fields 6, 6', 7, 7', 11, and 15 of figure 3-1 in Hyndman. The syenites are on the border between the QAP and the APF triangles. The remaining rocks are in the APF triangle. Phonolite is actually an extrusive or hypabyssal equivalent of nepheline syenite. The ultrmafic rocks and lamprophyre are very rich in mafic minerals. Consequently they cannot be plotted on the main part of the QAPF diagram, although technically they plot in field 16 (Figure 3-1, Hyndman) in a separate rectangle. More information on these rocks is available in Chapters 9, 14, 15, 16, and 17 in Moorhouse. SYENITE - Intrusive igneous, plutonic. The major mineral is feldspar, with greater than 65% alkali feldspar (K-spar or albite). The ferromagnesian minerals are usually # 20%. The K-spar is typically orthoclase, microcline or perthite. In dikes sanidine may be present. Any plagioclase present is generally subhedral and is often zoned (normal or oscillatory). Biotite is often present and is usually brown. Small amounts of feldspathoids, like nepheline and sodalite, may be present. If more than 5% of these minerals are present, the rock is called nepheline (or sodalite) syenite. Sphene, apatite, ilmenite, magnetite, zircon, and monzonite are accessories. In the IUGS classification, 0-5 Q, and P/(A+P) is 10-35. The name is for Syene (near Aswan), Egypt. Pliny the Elder named granite-like rocks from this area for the locality. ALKALI SYENITE - Intrusive igneous, plutonic.
    [Show full text]
  • I Geology and Petrography of Volcanic Rocks of the Truk Islands, East Qqa .2 T»C Caroline Islands
    I Geology and Petrography of Volcanic Rocks of the Truk Islands, East QQa .2 t»C Caroline Islands 3 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 409 19 O QQ I 1 OQ Geology and Petrography of Volcanic Rocks of the Truk Islands, East Caroline Islands By J. T. STARK and R. L. HAY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 409 A structural, stratigraphic, and petrographic study of the rocks of a highly dissected, partly submerged inactive shield volcano UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract- 1 16 Introduction . 1 Petrography of eastern and western islands 17 1 Olivine basalt 17 o Nepheline basalt 19 Melilite-nepheline basalt _ 20 Nepheline basanite - 20 Geology6J q Classification 20 4 9,0 Eastern islands . 5 Trachyte, ___ 21 Moen 5 22 Falo.. _-_.---.- 6 22 YanagL 6 22 Dublon Island 6 Andesite, basalt, and trachyte blocks 22 -CjTiGri 7 Gabbro blocks _ 23 Fefan. _ _ 7 25 Param _ 7 Tarik._ _ _____________ _____.-_ 8 Tsis _ - 8 OK Uman, Tako, and Atkin . __ q 25 9 Monzonite blocks- 26 q Limestone fragments 27 9 27 Chemical composition and variation diagrams _ 27 Lava flows and autoclastic breccias __ 9 29 Dikes 10 Conclusions 32 Udot__. ________________________________ 10 Eastern and western islands Eot 10 qq Eiol 11 qq 11 Trachyte and quartz trachyte. 34 11 Gabbro blocks 36 19 Recrystallized basalt blocks 38 12 Dikes of andesite and basalt in gabbro 38 12 Monzonite and quartz monzonite .
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Selected Quadrangles in Massachusetts
    Geology of Selected Quadrangles In Massachusetts GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1163 This volume was printed as separate chapters A-D UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director CONTENTS [The letters in parentheses preceding the titles designate separately published chapters] (A) Bedrock geology of the Salem quadrangle and vicinity, Massachusetts1, by Priestley Toulmin 3d. (B) Geology of the Norwood quadrangle, Norfolk and Suffolk Counties, by Newton E. Chute. (C) Surficial geology of the Athol quadrangle, Worcester and Franklin Coun­ ties, Massachusetts, by Donald F. Eschman. (D) Geology of the Taunton quadrangle, Bristol and Plymouth Counties, Massa­ chusetts, by Joseph H. Hartshorn. o ; Bedrock Geology of the Salem Quadrangle and Vicinity > Massachusetts w By PRIESTLEY TOULMIN 3d GEOLOGY OF SELECTED QUADRANGLES IN MASSACHUSETTS ~s -GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1163-A Prepared in cooperation with the i Massachusetts Department of Public Works « UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., 20402 ^ CONTENTS /y Page I.-N Abstract. _ ______________________------__--_--____-______________ Al Introduction._ ____________________________________________________ 2 Location and accessibility-__--__----_-----_---____________-____ 2 Previous work_______________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Classification of Common Volcanic Rocks Based on Degree of Silica Saturation and Cao/K2O Ratio
    An Acad Bras Cienc (2021) 93(3): e20201202 DOI 10.1590/0001-3765202120201202 Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências | Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences Printed ISSN 0001-3765 I Online ISSN 1678-2690 www.scielo.br/aabc | www.fb.com/aabcjournal GEOSCIENCES Chemical classifi cation of common Running title: CHEMICAL volcanic rocks based on degree of CLASSIFICATION OF VOLCANIC ROCKS silica saturation and CaO/K2O ratio JOÃO O.S. SANTOS & LÉO A. HARTMANN Academy Section: GEOSCIENCES Abstract: Modal classifi cations of common volcanic rocks are expensive, diffi cult, or impossible to attain. As a consequence, these rocks are classifi ed using the chemical e20201202 composition. However, existing classifi catory diagrams are unable to identify all 16 families of common volcanic rocks; the most used is the total alkali-silica (TAS) diagram that identifi es six families. Rocks not in the TAS diagram are misclassifi ed with other 93 rock names; their names are evolving to extinction, e.g. latite and rhyodacite. Some (3) diagrams use Na O, which is a complicating element rather than discriminant. Na O is 93(3) 2 2 present both in alkali feldspar and plagioclase making diffi cult the separation of the DOI amount associated to either feldspar. Silicon, potassium, and calcium are the three 10.1590/0001-3765202120201202 major elements with highest variations among volcanic rocks. They are selected for use in two new diagrams confronting CaO/K2O ratio with K2O content (KCK diagrams). One diagram is designed for saturated (intermediate) rocks (quartz <5 vol.%) and the other for oversaturated (acid) volcanic rocks (quartz >5%).
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Age, Extent and Composition of the Cinder Lake Alkaline Intrusive Complex, Knee Lake Area, Manitoba (Part of NTS 53L15) by A.R
    GS-10 Evaluation of the age, extent and composition of the Cinder Lake alkaline intrusive complex, Knee Lake area, Manitoba (part of NTS 53L15) by A.R. Chakhmouradian1, C.O. Böhm, R.D. Kressall1 and P.G. Lenton Chakhmouradian, A.R., Böhm, C.O., Kressall, R.D. and Lenton, P.G. 2008: Evaluation of the age, extent and composition of the Cinder Lake alkaline intrusive complex, Knee Lake area, Manitoba (part of NTS 53L15); in Report of Activities 2008, Manitoba Science, Technology, Energy and Mines, Manitoba Geological Survey, p. 109–120. Summary Geological overview of A detailed reinvestigation of alkaline igneous rocks the Cinder Lake area from the southwestern part of Cinder Lake (Gods Lake The study area is located in the central part of the Domain) was initiated as a joint project between the Neoarchean Gods Lake Domain (GLD), the largest green- Manitoba Geological Survey and Department of stone-granite belt in the northwestern Superior Province Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba. At least (Figure GS-10-1). The GLD is a sublatitudinal structure three discrete intrusive phases can be identified at present extending from west of Cross Lake across central Mani- on the basis of field and petrographic evidence (listed in toba for a distance of ~400 km into northwestern Ontario, order of emplacement): fine-grained aegirine-nepheline where it continues as the Stull Domain within the Archean syenite, fine-grained biotite-vishnevite syenite and Sachigo subprovince (e.g., Stott and Rayner, 2004). syenitic pegmatite. There is also convincing mineralogical Cinder Lake is accessible by floatplane or boat from and geochemical evidence for the presence of unexposed Oxford House, some 27 km to the west, and from the ultramafic and carbonatitic units genetically associated North Star resort at nearby Knee Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • 128 FELDSPATHOID MINERALIZATION in EXPERIMENTAL SKARN COLUMNS S.V. Ezhov Moscow State Geological and Prospecting Academy, Moscow
    128 FELDSPATHOID MINERALIZATION IN EXPERIMENTAL SKARN COLUMNS S.V. Ezhov Moscow State Geological and Prospecting academy, Moscow This study was supported by the Russian Fundamental Research Foundation (Project No. 99-05-64908) Herald DGGGMS RAS № 5 (15)’2000 v.2 URL: http://www.scgis.ru/russian/cp1251/h_dgggms/5-2000/hydroterm14.eng Feldspathoid mineralization (nepheline, so- ders (fig. 2 b, d), 3) at open edge of the ampule in dalite, cancrinite) in former experimental bime- where interaction between silicate rock and free so- tasomatic columns was marked in two conditions: 1) lution took place (fig. 2 c, d). when albite (or its mixture with quartz) was used as a Localization in 1-st position as a rule occured silicate rock, and CaO+MgO as a carbonate one, with when mixtured NaCl+KCl solutions were used; in 2- the presence of NaCl solution, and 2) on the grano- nd and 3-rd ones – only was NaCl solution. diorite and limestone (or dolomite) contacts in cases Composition of initial rocks had not noticeable of using of alcaline Na (NaOH, NaF, NaCO3) solu- importance – feldspathoids could appear in cases of tions [1]. The only NaCl or NaCl+KCl solutions were using as granodiorite-porphyry so artificial potash used while our experiments have been condacted. feldspar -quartz mixture (where complete The special feature of the experiments was the replacement of potash feldspar by albite took place). presence of sulphides (galena, sphalerite and others) Limestone as well as dolomite can be used as a or calcium sulphate. Feldspathoids have been devel- carbonate rock (pure or with anhydrite admixture).
    [Show full text]