Aboriginal Health and Wellness Plan 2002/03 – 2005/06

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aboriginal Health and Wellness Plan 2002/03 – 2005/06 APPENDICES (Abridged Version) Aboriginal Health and Wellness Plan 2002/03 – 2005/06 Interior Health Authority Submitted to the Ministries of Health Services and Health Planning Original: September 2002 Revised: February 2003 Submitted by Interior Health Authority in Partnership with the Interior Health Aboriginal Health and Wellness Advisory Committe 1 APPENDICES to the INTERIOR HEALTH ABORIGINAL HEALTH AND WELLNESS PLAN 2002/03-2005/06 LIST OF APPENDICES: APPENDIX A: HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLES IN CANADA APPENDIX B: TERMINOLOGY APPENDIX C: COPY OF “ABORIGINAL HEALTH CARE ISSUES” APPENDIX D: COPY OF DRAFT GOALS AND STRATEGIES DEVELOPED BY THE OKANAGAN SIMILKAMEEN HEALTH REGION, ABORIGINAL HEALTH WORKING GROUP APPENDIX E: COPY OF THE KTUNAXA KINBASKET TRIBAL COUNCIL AND EAST KOOTENAY HEALTH AUTHORITIES: MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING “HEALTHY PEOPLE IN HEALTHY FAMILIES IN HEALTHY COMMUNITIES” APPENDIX F: COPY OF LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ALL FIRST NATIONS COUNCIL REPORT ON AN ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY CAPACITY BUILDING PROJECT APPENDIX G: MAP OF INTERIOR HEALTH APPENDIX H: LIST OF ABORIGINAL ORGANIZATIONS AND COMMUNITITES WITHIN THE INTERIOR HEALTH BOUNDARY APPENDIX I: LIMITATIONS OF DATA SOURCES APPENDIX J: INDIAN RESERVE POPULATION COUNTS WITHIN THE INTERIOR HEALTH APPENDIX K: STATUS INDIAN AND OTHER POPULATION COUNT FOR BC BY AGE AND GENDER (BC VITAL STATISTICS AGENCY) APPENDIX L: LIST OF PARTICIPATING ABORIGINAL ORGANIZATIONS AND COMMUNITIES IN THE ABORIGINAL HEALTH AND WELLNESS PLANNING PROCESS APPENDIX M: COPY OF DRAFT ABORIGINAL HEALTH PLAN BY WEIR CONSULTING (FORMER NORTH OKANAGAN HEALTH REGION) APPENDIX N: COPY OF DRAFT “SUMMARY REPORT: ABORIGINAL HEALTH AND WELLNESS PLANNING-THOMSPON/CARIBOO/CHILCOTIN HEALTH SERVICE REGION” INTERIOR HEALTH ABORIGINAL HEALTH AND WELLNESS PLAN REVISED FEB. 2003 3 APPENDIX O: LIST OF INVITEES TO THE INTERIOR HEALTH AUTHORITY REGIONAL ABORIGINAL CONFERENCE- MAY 6, 2002 AND WORKING GROUP NOTES APPENDIX P: AHWAC DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCE APPENDIX Q: HEALTH SERVICES FUNDED/PROVIDED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF CANADA APPENDIX R: INFORMATION GATHERING TOOL FOR SERVICES APPENDIX S: PROPOSED 3 - YEAR OUTCOME TARGETS APPENDIX T: LOGIC MODEL FOR THE INTERIOR HEALTH ABORIGINAL HEALTH AND WELLNESS PLAN, PROPOSED 3 - YEAR OUTCOME TARGETS APPENDIX U: ACCOUNTABILITY MAP - LINKING INTERIOR HEALTH OPERATIONS TO THE IH ABORIGINAL HEALTH AND WELLNESS PLAN INTERIOR HEALTH ABORIGINAL HEALTH AND WELLNESS PLAN REVISED FEB. 2003 4 APPENDIX A: HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLES IN CANADA Residential Schools The first Indian residential school was established in Alderville, Ontario in 1849. In 1892, an Order in Council was passed which contained the regulations for the operation of residential schools. From 1920 onwards, school was mandatory for children aged 7-15. The schools were part of the general assimilationist policy of the government that was explicitly stated even into the 1950’s. Four churches were involved in the operation of the schools on a contractual basis with the federal government: Roman Catholic, orders, Anglican, Presbyterian, and United. It is estimated that about 100,000 children attended the residential schools, about 20 percent of the potential total of status Indian students. In the early years, the churches explicitly supported the assimilationist goals in running the schools. Thinking began to change in the 1960’s about the harm to children in separating them from their families and the increasingly evident failure of assimilation. The residential schools in Canada The residential schools in Canada separated children from their families and communities, adhered to a strict institutional regimen and religious dogma, punished children for speaking in their traditional language and subjected many First Nation children to varying degrees of verbal, physical and sexual abuse. The results of this residential school policy have left behind a very negative legacy that has contributed to dysfunctional individuals, families and communities, alcoholism and alcohol related deaths, disproportional rates of incarceration, high rates of suicide, and many troubled and angry people and communities. The positive effects of the residential schools were general academic skills such as math, reading, etc and athletic achievement. The positive effects do not appear to outweigh the destruction of First Nation families and communities, language, culture, spirituality and a sense of First Nation identity and pride. This is but one of the precedents that has led to the wide range of complicated issues and challenges that our society is facing now. Interior Health is in a better position to understand the Aboriginal history and find positive ways to address Aboriginal health. Aboriginal Peoples in Canada and the Federal Government/British Crown In providing an understanding of the past, the following is a historical look at Canada and BC’s relationship with Aboriginal peoples. (Source: http://www.cariboolinks.com/ctc/history.html) Time What Occurred INTERIOR HEALTH ABORIGINAL HEALTH AND WELLNESS PLAN REVISED FEB. 2003 10, 000 Earliest evidence of Aboriginal civilizations in British Columbia. BC Archaeological evidence found at Soda Creek in the summer of 1995 was carbon dated at approximately 4,300 years ago. Pre 30 million Indigenous people in North America colonial contact AD 1492 Columbus lands in the West Indies 1755 The British Crown established the Indian Department as a branch of the military. This department was created to foster good relations with Indians, and to cultivate military alliances with them. 1763 A Royal Proclamation by King George III promoted and clarified the rights for “native people” regarding their traditional territories and included recognition of specific Indian settlements in Quebec. 1770s- Captain Cook explores West Coast 1780s 1774 Juan Perez Hernandez lands on Vancouver Island’s west coast. 1793 Alexander McKenzie reaches the Pacific via an overland route. 1849 Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC) given imperial grant to settle and colonize Vancouver Island. 1850-54 The colonial Office directs James Douglas to purchase First nations lands, first in his capacity as chief factor of the HBC, ad later as Governor of the Colony. He arranges 14 purchases, now known as the Douglas Treaties, mostly on southern Vancouver Island. 1858-64 Gold seekers flood the BC Interior. 1860s Reserves are set aside. These first reserve allocations were larger than today’s reserves, but these records were destroyed in 1871. 1862-63 Smallpox almost wipes out the Secwepemc nation. Six reserves are left with only a few members who relocate to neighbouring Bands in order to survive. 1867 At the time of confederation, the new British North America Act gave the Federal government legislative authority over “Indians and land reserves for Indians”. 1867- The Administration of Indian and Northern Affairs was handled by various federal 1996 government departments including: • Office of the Secretary of State, • Citizenship and immigration, • Mines and Resources, and • Northern Affairs and Natural Resources. 1869 The Enfranchisement Act- Encouraged, or lured, First Nation citizens to give up their First Nation status in exchange for Canadian style rights such as property rights, the vote etc. This was to encourage integration/assimilation to Canadian society. 1872 BC joined Canada, at the time the Aboriginal people in the province were the majority and still had the right to vote. The new Canadian province, BC, passed a Qualification and Registration of Voters Act of 1872 which stripped natives of the vote in provincial elections. 1874 Indians were registered in anticipation of the Indian Act. 1876 The Indian Act was passed 1881 Indian agency opened in the Cariboo 1884 An Indian Act amendment prohibits the potlatch and sundance. The law was rescinded in 1951. INTERIOR HEALTH ABORIGINAL HEALTH AND WELLNESS PLAN REVISED FEB. 2003 1891 St. Joseph’s Mission south of Williams Lake, three generations of Chilcotin, Carrier and Shuswap were taken there in an attempt to make ‘good British subjects’ out of them. 1910 Interior Tribes in BC meet in Spences Bridge to present their views to Sir Wilfrid Laurier, then Prime Minister of Canada, on wanting to settle the land and Aboriginal rights issue. The tribes were the Nl’kapmux, Stl’atl’imx, Okanagan, Tsilqht’in, and Secwepemc. The tribes signed the Sir Wilfrid Laurier Memorial. Laurier promised to take Native issues to privy council for resolution, his defeat in the 1911 election ended that initiative. 1916 The McKenna McBride Commission ruled the size of existing Indian reserves could be unilaterally reduced if Ottawa would obtain consent from the natives, and that other lands would be added. The Native withheld consent stating the lands to be added were almost worthless. The provincial total amount of reserve land shrunk significantly. This led to the “Cut-Off Lands” referred to in specific land claims. 1918 Canadian Women win the right to vote in federal elections in Canada. This does not include Indian Women, or Indian men. 1920 Ottawa enacts Bill 13 which overrode the need for native consent. Canada passes the BC Indian Lands Settlement Act, the McKenna McBride Commission recommendations go ahead reducing reserve land to less than 36% of the total area of BC. Next came Bill 14, empowered the enfranchisement or removal of any Natives from ‘status’, those who went to fight in the wars, worked and lived off reserve were among those who lost their ‘Indian status’
Recommended publications
  • Annex 4.C.4 Terms of Reference for the IAMC for Trans Mountain Project TRANS MOUNTAIN INDIGENOUS ADVISORY and MONITORING COMMITTEE TERMS of REFERENCE
    Annex 4.C.4 Terms of Reference for the IAMC for Trans Mountain Project TRANS MOUNTAIN INDIGENOUS ADVISORY AND MONITORING COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE DEFINITIONS 1. Defined terms in these Terms of Reference have the following meanings, which also include their singular and plural forms: “Committee” means the Trans Mountain Indigenous Advisory and Monitoring Committee established by these Terms of Reference as detailed in section 24, as may be amended from time to time; “Committee Members” means the Indigenous Caucus and the Government Committee Members; “CPCN” means the new Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity, Instrument No. OC-064 issued to Kinder Morgan in relation to the Project on 1 December 2016; “DFO” means Fisheries and Oceans Canada; “Government” means the Government of Canada, including its departments and agencies; “Government Committee Members” are the representatives of federal government departments and agencies as contemplated by section 24(b); “Indigenous Caucus” means the members of the Committee appointed by the Indigenous Communities; “Indigenous Communities” are those Indigenous communities and groups to which the federal Crown determined it owes a duty to consult in relation to the Project, as set out in Appendix A; “Kinder Morgan” means Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC or the company that currently holds the CPCN, NEB Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity OC-49 and OC-2 for the existing NEB-regulated Trans Mountain pipeline, together with all related Amending Orders, authorizations and exemptions
    [Show full text]
  • Nicola Watershed Governance Project Indigenous Laws Research
    Nicola Watershed Governance Project Indigenous Laws Research First Nations Fisheries Council of BC 2019 Annual General Assembly Memorandum of Understanding March 2018 the five Nicola Chiefs agreed to work collaboratively with the Province of British Columbia to co-lead a new approach to water stewardship throughout the Nicola watershed. This project is grounded in the commitment of these parties to implement the United Nations Declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples. (UNDRIP) Nicola Watershed Nicola Valley Two Nations: syilx and Nłeʔkepmx Five Bands Coldwater Indian Band Lower Nicola Indian Band Nooaitch Indian Band Shackan Indian Band Upper Nicola Indian Band Watershed Governance Staff Eva Tom, Indigenous Laws Research Liaison Jessica Dan, Indigenous Laws & Research Technician Crystal McMaster, Communications and Engagement Manager Nadia Joe, Nicola Forum Coordinator Alex Etchell, Project Associate Lee Failing, Facilitator and Strategic Advisor The Nicola Chiefs have commissioned the University of Victoria’s Indigenous Laws Research Unit to begin research into Nłeʔkepmx and syilx laws as they relate to water. University of Victoria Indigenous Laws Research Unit Team Dr. Val Napoleon, Director/Law Foundation Research Chair in Aboriginal Justice & Governance Dr. Rebecca Johnson, Associate Director Brooke Edmonds, ILRU Coordinator Jessica Asch, Research Director Simon Owen, Senior Researcher Lindsay Borrows, Tara Williamson, Researchers: Contact Information: Telephone: 250-721-8914 Email: [email protected] Website: www.uvic.ca/ilru Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/indigenouslawresearchunit/ The Work Plan has five phase: 1. Planning and Building the Research Relationship o Refine goals of the project, research questions and resources 2. Knowledge Gathering Indigenous o Analyze narrative resources and draft overview material.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-2018 Annual Report
    COMMUNITY FUTURES SUN COUNTRY 2017 ANNUAL REPORT 2018 CELEBRATING MISSION STATEMENT To plan and initiate development of our area through promotion and facilitation of cooperative activities dedicated to the social, environmental and economic well-being of our citizens. Community Futures Sun Country TABLE OF CONTENTS Mission Statement Our Service Area Message from the Board Chair and General Manager ........................................... 1 About Community Futures Sun Country ................................................................ 2 Meet Our Team ..................................................................................................... 3 Board of Directors ............................................................................................ 3 Management and Finance ................................................................................ 8 Our Accomplishments ......................................................................................... 10 Strategic Priorities ............................................................................................... 11 Celebrating 30 Years ........................................................................................... 12 Loans Program ................................................................................................... 21 Community Economic Development ................................................................... 26 Wildfire Business Transition Project ......................................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • Nlaka'pamux Decision (2011)
    COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Nlaka’pamux Nation Tribal Council v. British Columbia (Environmental Assessment Office), 2011 BCCA 78 Date: 20110218 Docket: CA037570 Between: Nlaka’pamux Nation Tribal Council Appellant (Petitioner) 2011 BCCA 78 (CanLII) And Derek Griffin in his capacity as Project Assessment Director, Environmental Assessment Office, Belkorp Environmental Services Inc. and Village of Cache Creek Respondents (Respondents) Before: The Honourable Madam Justice Rowles The Honourable Madam Justice D. Smith The Honourable Mr. Justice Groberman On appeal from: the Supreme Court of British Columbia, September 17, 2009, (Nlaka’pamux Nation Tribal Council v. Griffin, 2009 BCSC 1275, Vancouver Registry No. S092162) Counsel for the Appellant: Reidar Mogerman Mark G. Underhill Counsel for the Respondent Griffin: Patrick G. Foy, QC Erin K. Christie Counsel for the Respondent Belkorp: Stephen M. Fitterman Place and Date of Hearing: Vancouver, British Columbia March 31, 2010 Place and Date of Judgment: Vancouver, British Columbia February 18, 2011 Written Reasons by: The Honourable Mr. Justice Groberman Nlaka’pamux Nation Tribal Council v. British Columbia (Environmental Assessment Office) Page 2 Concurred in by: The Honourable Madam Justice Rowles The Honourable Madam Justice D. Smith 2011 BCCA 78 (CanLII) Nlaka’pamux Nation Tribal Council v. British Columbia (Environmental Assessment Office) Page 3 Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Mr. Justice Groberman: [1] This appeal arises out of a proposal to extend a landfill near Cache Creek by about 40 hectares. The landfill extension would occupy land over which the Nlaka’pamux First Nation claims Aboriginal rights and title. [2] The appellant (which I will refer to as the NNTC) is a tribal council incorporated in 1981.
    [Show full text]
  • Commitments Tracking Table Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Version 20 - December 7, 2018
    Trans Mountain Expansion Project Commitment Tracking Table (Condition 6), December 7, 2018 Commitments Tracking Table Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Version 20 - December 7, 2018 Project Stage Commitment Status "Prior to Construction" - To be completed prior to construction of specific facility or relevant section of pipeline "Scoping" - Work has not commenced "During Construction" - To be completed during construction of specific facility or relevant section of pipeline "In Progress - Work has commenced or is partially complete "Prior to Operations" - To be completed prior to commencing operations "Superseded by Condition" - Commitment has been superseded by NEB, BC EAO condition, legal/regulatory requirement "Operations" - To be completed after operations have commenced, including post-construction monitoring conditions "Superseded by Management Plan" - Addressed by Trans Mountain Policy or plans, procedures, documents developed for Project "Project Lifecycle" - Ongoing commitment design and execution "No Longer Applicable" - Change in project design or execution "Superseded by TMEP Notification Task Force Program" - Addressed by the project specific Notification Task Force Program "Complete" - Commitment has been met Note: Red text indicates a change in Commitment Status or a new Commitment, from the previously filed version. "No Longer Applicable" - Change in project design or execution Note: As of August 31, 2018, Kinder Morgan ceased to be an owner of Trans Mountain. References to Kinder Morgan Canada or KMC in the table below have
    [Show full text]
  • Language List 2019
    First Nations Languages in British Columbia – Revised June 2019 Family1 Language Name2 Other Names3 Dialects4 #5 Communities Where Spoken6 Anishnaabemowin Saulteau 7 1 Saulteau First Nations ALGONQUIAN 1. Anishinaabemowin Ojibway ~ Ojibwe Saulteau Plains Ojibway Blueberry River First Nations Fort Nelson First Nation 2. Nēhiyawēwin ᓀᐦᐃᔭᐍᐏᐣ Saulteau First Nations ALGONQUIAN Cree Nēhiyawēwin (Plains Cree) 1 West Moberly First Nations Plains Cree Many urban areas, especially Vancouver Cheslatta Carrier Nation Nak’albun-Dzinghubun/ Lheidli-T’enneh First Nation Stuart-Trembleur Lake Lhoosk’uz Dene Nation Lhtako Dene Nation (Tl’azt’en, Yekooche, Nadleh Whut’en First Nation Nak’azdli) Nak’azdli Whut’en ATHABASKAN- ᑕᗸᒡ NaZko First Nation Saik’uz First Nation Carrier 12 EYAK-TLINGIT or 3. Dakelh Fraser-Nechakoh Stellat’en First Nation 8 Taculli ~ Takulie NA-DENE (Cheslatta, Sdelakoh, Nadleh, Takla Lake First Nation Saik’uZ, Lheidli) Tl’azt’en Nation Ts’il KaZ Koh First Nation Ulkatcho First Nation Blackwater (Lhk’acho, Yekooche First Nation Lhoosk’uz, Ndazko, Lhtakoh) Urban areas, especially Prince George and Quesnel 1 Please see the appendix for definitions of family, language and dialect. 2 The “Language Names” are those used on First Peoples' Language Map of British Columbia (http://fp-maps.ca) and were compiled in consultation with First Nations communities. 3 The “Other Names” are names by which the language is known, today or in the past. Some of these names may no longer be in use and may not be considered acceptable by communities but it is useful to include them in order to assist with the location of language resources which may have used these alternate names.
    [Show full text]
  • First Nations Health Authority Environmental Contaminants Program
    First Nations Health Authority Environmental Contaminants Program GUIDELINES FOR PROPOSALS: A Guide for Health Professionals CONTENTS What is the First Nations Health Authority Environmental Contaminants Program? 1 Who can Apply? 2 Helpful Hints on Building Your Project 4 Project Funding 5 Eligible Projects 6 Review and Selection Process 8 Tools and Resources 12 Proposal Format 14 Example Budget 18 Application Checklist 20 Appendices 22 EXPLORING THE LINK BETWEEN HUMAN HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINANTS GUIDELINES FOR PROPOSALS 3 o n m e i r n t a v F a m i l y l C n R o E e s m Wisdom p P m o h n u y mot s E io s n n C a i R i l b i HUMAN c e M t i S u BEING s y a l e L i n p l o t t a a l e y l n c t c t d S u p i i a r ritual a R l l el s ationship N a t i o n s E c o n o m i c ABOUT What is the BC First Nations a l Environmental Contaminants Program? t THE PROCESS e n S y o m i l L R a c n m om e n The First Nations Health Authority: Environmental Contaminants Program (ECP) supports First a s i Nations projects that explore the link between human health and environmental contaminants. It is d p d o F is e a intended to help First Nation communities in BC address their environmental health concerns and na c to support capacity development.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Federal/Provincial Consultation and Accommodation Report for the Trans Mountain Expension Project
    Joint Federal/Provincial Consultation and Accommodation Report for the Trans Mountain Expansion Project November 2016 Joint Federal/Provincial Consultation and Accommodation Report for the TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms, Abbreviations and Definitions Used in This Report ...................... xi 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of the Report ..............................................................................1 1.2 Project Description .................................................................................2 1.3 Regulatory Review Including the Environmental Assessment Process .....................7 1.3.1 NEB REGULATORY REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS ....................7 1.3.2 BRITISH COLUMBIA’S ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS ...............................8 1.4 NEB Recommendation Report.....................................................................9 2. APPROACH TO CONSULTING ABORIGINAL GROUPS ........................... 12 2.1 Identification of Aboriginal Groups ............................................................. 12 2.2 Information Sources .............................................................................. 19 2.3 Consultation With Aboriginal Groups ........................................................... 20 2.3.1 PRINCIPLES INVOLVED IN ESTABLISHING THE DEPTH OF DUTY TO CONSULT AND IDENTIFYING THE EXTENT OF ACCOMMODATION ........................................ 24 2.3.2 PRELIMINARY
    [Show full text]
  • A GUIDE to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia (December 2013)
    A GUIDE TO Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia (December 2013) A GUIDE TO Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia (December 2013) INTRODUCTORY NOTE A Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia is a provincial listing of First Nation, Métis and Aboriginal organizations, communities and community services. The Guide is dependent upon voluntary inclusion and is not a comprehensive listing of all Aboriginal organizations in B.C., nor is it able to offer links to all the services that an organization may offer or that may be of interest to Aboriginal people. Publication of the Guide is coordinated by the Intergovernmental and Community Relations Branch of the Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation (MARR), to support streamlined access to information about Aboriginal programs and services and to support relationship-building with Aboriginal people and their communities. Information in the Guide is based upon data available at the time of publication. The Guide data is also in an Excel format and can be found by searching the DataBC catalogue at: http://www.data.gov.bc.ca. NOTE: While every reasonable effort is made to ensure the accuracy and validity of the information, we have been experiencing some technical challenges while updating the current database. Please contact us if you notice an error in your organization’s listing. We would like to thank you in advance for your patience and understanding as we work towards resolving these challenges. If there have been any changes to your organization’s contact information please send the details to: Intergovernmental and Community Relations Branch Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation PO Box 9100 Stn Prov.
    [Show full text]
  • Dionisio Point Excavations
    1HE• Publication of the Archaeological Society of Vol. 31 , No. I - 1999 Dionisio Point Excavations ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF &MIDDEN BRITISH COLUMBIA Published four times a year by the Archaeological Society of British Columbia Dedicated to the protection of archaeological resot:Jrces and the spread of archaeological knowledge. Editorial Committee Editor: Heather Myles (274-4294) President Field Editor: Richard Brolly (689-1678) Helmi Braches (462-8942) arcas@istar. ca [email protected] News Editor: Heather Myles Publications Editor: Robbin Chatan (215-1746) Membership [email protected] Sean Nugent (685-9592) Assistant Editors: Erin Strutt [email protected] erins@intergate. be.ca Fred Braches Annual membership includes I year's subscription to [email protected] The Midden and the ASBC newsletter, SocNotes. Production & Subscriptions: Fred Braches ( 462-8942) Membership Fees I SuBSCRIPTION is included with ASBC membership. Individual: $25 Family: $30 . Seniors/Students: $I 8 Non-members: $14.50 per year ($1 7.00 USA and overseas), Send cheque or money order payable to the ASBC to: payable in Canadian funds to the ASBC. Remit to: ASBC Memberships Midden Subscriptions, ASBC P.O. Box 520, Bentall Station P.O. Box 520, Bentall Station Vancouver BC V6C 2N3 Vancouver BC V6C 2N3 SuBMISSIONs: We welcome contributions on subjects germane ASBC on Internet to BC archaeology. Guidelines are available on request. Sub­ http://home.istar.ca/-glenchan/asbc/asbc.shtml missions and exchange publications should be directed to the appropriate editor at the ASBC address. Affiliated Chapters Copyright Nanaimo Contact: Rachael Sydenham Internet: http://www.geocities.com/rainforest/5433 Contents of The Midden are copyrighted by the ASBC.
    [Show full text]
  • Nlaka'pamux Nation Tribal Council
    Nlaka’pamux Nation Tribal Council - Province of British Columbia Political Accord on Advancing Recognition, Reconciliation, and Implementation of Title and Rights 1. The Nlaka’pamux Nation Tribal Council (NNTC) is a governing entity of the Nlaka’pamux peoples. The NNTC is committed to protecting, asserting and exercising Nlaka’pamux Title and Rights to bring about the self-sufficiency and well-being of the Nlaka’pamux people. The NNTC member communities are Boothroyd, Lytton, Boston Bar, Oregon Jack Creek, Skuppah, and Spuzzum. 2. The Province and the NNTC have entered into a number of agreements regarding the use of Nlaka’pamux territory that have been a foundation for collaborative relations. The agreements include: Interim Forestry Appendix/Agreement (2016) Economic and Community Development Agreement (ECDA) dealing with shared decision-making and revenue sharing in relation to the ongoing operations of the Highland Valley Copper Mine (2013) Land and Resource Shared Decision Making Pilot Agreement (2014, as amended) These agreements, and the relations they foster, have helped the Province and NNTC move through challenging conflicts, and establish a foundation for moving forward together on important decisions and actions. 3. The Land and Resource Shared Decision Making (SDM) Pilot Agreement established a foundational shared decision making model, and a joint Board structure. The SDM Board established a new way of co-operating between the Nlaka’pamux Nation and the Province. The Board structure and collaborative process moves away from individual and isolated assessments of potential impacts of any proposed project on Nlaka’pamux Title and Rights, to a shared and transparent process where there is equal accountability.
    [Show full text]
  • LNIB Community Profile
    Community Profile December 2015 Welcome! He’n’-le ! (Greetings!), On behalf of the Lower Nicola Indian Band (LNIB), I welcome you to our LNIB Community Profile. The purpose of the profile is to provide you with some essential information about LNIB. The profile highlights various topics, including an overview of who we are, our history, the programs that we deliver, the businesses that we are engaged with, our ancestral lands and Indian reserves, our administration, and our leadership and governance. LNIB is a vibrant community engaged in improving our lives, solidly grounded on the beliefs, traditions, and aspirations of our members. We are proud of who we are and what we have achieved, and we want to share our story with you. I hope that you will find the reading informative and enjoyable, and I thank you for the for the interest that you showed in learning more about us. Kwukwscmx, Humel, (Thank You!) Chief Aaron Sam Lower Nicola Indian Band 2 Vision Statement We, the people of the Lower Nicola Indian Band, commit ourselves to being a peaceful prosperous and secure community made up of healthy individuals rooted in the Nlaka’pamux culture, respecting ourselves, each other, the environment and all of Creation. We will honour and protect our children, the sacred gifts from the Creator, and our elders, the wisdom keepers. Together as one, we will take responsibility to regain control of our own destiny and rebuild our relationships with other people on a firm footing of respect and justice. We will possess our traditional territories and defend our hereditary and Aboriginal rights as Nlaka’pamux people, and promote the unity and strength of the Nlaka’pamux Nation as a whole.
    [Show full text]