DOCSLIB.ORG

Prospectus for Offers of the Gdrs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prospectus for Offers of the Gdrs IMPORTANT: You must read the following before continuing. The following applies to the Information Memorandum (the ‘‘Information Memorandum’’) following this page, and you are therefore advised to read this carefully before reading, accessing or making any other use of the Information Memorandum. In accessing the Information Memorandum, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them any time you receive any information from the company described herein (the ‘‘Company’’) as a result of such access. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION MEMORANDUM MAY NOT BE FORWARDED OR DISTRIBUTED OTHER THAN AS PROVIDED BELOW AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER. THIS INFORMATION MEMORANDUM MAY ONLY BE DISTRIBUTED IN ‘‘OFFSHORE TRANSACTIONS’’ AS PERMITTED BY REGULATION S UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE ‘‘SECURITIES ACT’’) OR WITHIN THE UNITED STATES TO PERSONS REASONABLY BELIEVED TO BE QIBs (AS DEFINED HEREIN) IN RELIANCE ON RULE 144A UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT (‘‘RULE 144A’’) OR ANOTHER EXEMPTION FROM, OR TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO, REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT. ANY FORWARDING, DISTRIBUTION OR REPRODUCTION OF THIS INFORMATION MEMORANDUM IN WHOLE OR IN PART IS UNAUTHORIZED. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS DIRECTIVE MAY RESULT IN A VIOLATION OF THE SECURITIES ACT OR THE APPLICABLE LAWS OF OTHER JURISDICTIONS. NOTHING IN THIS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES AN OFFER OF SECURITIES FOR SALE IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE IT IS UNLAWFUL TO DO SO. THE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN AND WILL NOT BE REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR WITH ANY SECURITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF ANY STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND MAY NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD, PLEDGED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT (1) IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 144A TO A PERSON THAT THE HOLDER AND ANY PERSON ACTING ON ITS BEHALF REASONABLY BELIEVE IS A QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYER WITHIN THE MEANING OF RULE 144A (A ‘‘QIB’’), OR (2) IN AN OFFSHORE TRANSACTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 903 OR RULE 904 OF REGULATION S UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT, IN EACH CASE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE OF THE UNITED STATES. Confirmation of Your Representation: In order to be eligible to view this Information Memorandum or make an investment decision with respect to the securities offered pursuant thereto, you must be (i) a person that is outside the United States for the purposes of Regulation S under the Securities Act or (ii) a QIB that is acquiring the securities for its own account or for the account of another QIB. This Information Memorandum is being sent at your request and by accepting the e-mail and accessing this Information Memorandum, you shall be deemed to have represented to the Company that you are outside the United States for the purposes of Regulation S under the Securities Act or that you are a QIB and that you consent to delivery of such Information Memorandum by electronic transmission. Except with respect to eligible investors in jurisdictions where such offer is permitted by law, nothing in this electronic transmission constitutes an offer or an invitation by or on behalf of either the issuer of the securities, J.P. Morgan Securities plc, UBS Limited and VTB Capital plc (the ‘‘Managers’’) to subscribe for or purchase any of the securities described herein, and access has been limited so that it shall not constitute a general solicitation or general advertising (each as defined in Regulation D under the Securities Act) or directed selling efforts (as defined in Regulation S under the Securities Act) in the United States or elsewhere. If a jurisdiction requires that the offering be made by a licensed broker or dealer and the Managers or any affiliate of the Managers is a licensed broker or dealer in that jurisdiction, the offering shall be deemed to be made by the Managers or such affiliate on behalf of the Company in such jurisdiction. This Information Memorandum may only be communicated or caused to be communicated to persons in the United Kingdom in circumstances where section 21(1) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 does not apply and may be distributed in the United Kingdom only to persons who (i) have professional experience in matters relating to investments falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (as amended) (the ‘‘Order’’), or (ii) are persons falling within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) (‘‘high net worth companies, unincorporated associations etc.’’) of the Order (all such persons together being referred to as ‘‘relevant persons’’). In the United Kingdom, the Information Memorandum is directed only at relevant persons and must not be acted on or relied on by persons who are not relevant persons. Any investment or investment activity to which the Information Memorandum relates is available only to relevant persons and will be engaged in only with relevant persons. This Information Memorandum has been sent to you in an electronic form. You are reminded that documents transmitted via this medium may be altered or changed during the process of electronic transmission, and consequently none of the Company or the Managers, any person who controls any of them, or any director, officer, employee or agent of the Company or the Managers or any affiliate of any such person accepts any liability or responsibility whatsoever in respect of any difference between the Information Memorandum distributed to you in electronic format and the hard copy version available to you on request from the Managers. You are reminded that you have accessed the attached Information Memorandum on the basis that you are a person into whose possession this Information Memorandum may be lawfully delivered in accordance with the laws of the jurisdiction in which you are located, and you may not nor are you authorized to deliver or forward this document, electronically or otherwise, to any other person. If you have gained access to this transmission contrary to the foregoing restrictions, you will be unable to purchase any of the securities described herein. Actions That You May Not Take: You should not reply by e-mail to this announcement, and you may not purchase any securities by doing so. Any reply e-mail communications, including those you generate by using the reply function on your e-mail software, will be ignored and rejected. 25MAR201104573521 ROS AGRO PLC (a public company limited by shares incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Cyprus) Offering of 16,666,665 Global Depositary Receipts Offer Price: US$15 per GDR (the ‘‘Offer Price’’) This Information Memorandum (the ‘‘Information Memorandum’’) relates to an offering (the ‘‘Offering’’) by ROS AGRO PLC (the ‘‘Company’’) of 16,666,665 global depositary receipts (the ‘‘GDRs’’) representing 3,333,333 ordinary shares, each with a nominal value of A0.01 (‘‘Ordinary Shares’’), of the Company. Five GDRs represent an interest in one Ordinary Share. The GDRs are being offered (i) in the United States to certain persons reasonably believed to be qualified institutional buyers (‘‘QIBs’’), as defined in, and in reliance on, Rule 144A (‘‘Rule 144A’’) under the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘‘Securities Act’’), or another exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, and (ii) outside the United States in offshore transactions in reliance on Regulation S under the Securities Act (‘‘Regulation S’’). See ‘‘Plan of Distribution.’’ The Offering does not constitute an offer to sell, or solicitation of an offer to buy, securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation would be unlawful. The GDRs have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act or with any securities regulatory authority of any state or other jurisdiction of the United States and may not be offered or sold within the United States, except to persons reasonably believed to be QIBs in reliance on Rule 144A or another exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, or outside the United States in offshore transactions in reliance on Regulation S. Prospective purchasers are hereby notified that sellers of the GDRs may be relying on the exemption from the provisions of Section 5 of the Securities Act provided by Rule 144A. For a discussion of certain restrictions on transfers of the GDRs, see ‘‘Transfer and Selling Restrictions.’’ Mr. Vadim Moshkovich, the controlling beneficial shareholder of the Company, through Shiny Property Limited, a company controlled by him, has participated in the Offering and has agreed to purchase GDRs in an amount of approximately US$99.6 million. In addition, Mr. Maxim Basov, the Chief Executive Officer, has directly participated in the Offering and has agreed to purchase GDRs in an amount of approximately US$17.5 million. INVESTMENT IN THE GDRS INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. The GDRs are of a specialist nature and should only be purchased and traded by investors who are particularly knowledgeable in investment matters. Potential investors should be prepared to bear the risk of a total loss of their investment. For a discussion of certain factors regarding the Company and the GDRs that should be considered by potential investors, see ‘‘Risk Factors.’’ In connection with the Company’s admission to the official list (‘‘Official List’’) of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (‘‘FCA’’) and the London Stock Exchange plc (the ‘‘London Stock Exchange’’) on April 13, 2011, a total of 120,000,000 GDRs were admitted to the Official List and the London Stock Exchange. There are currently 25,000,000 GDRs in issue. Following the Offering, there will be 120,000,000 GDRs admitted in aggregate, consisting of (i) 25,000,000 existing GDRs, (ii) 16,666,665 GDRs to be issued on or about May 5, 2016, and (iii) up to an additional 78,333,335 GDRs to be issued from time to time against the deposit of the Ordinary Shares with BNY (Nominees) Limited, as custodian (the ‘‘Custodian’’) acting on behalf of The Bank of New York Mellon in its capacity as depositary (the ‘‘Depositary’’).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Securities Market Newsletter
    SSEECCUURRIIITTIIIEESS MMAARRKKEETT NNEEWWSSLLEETTTTEERR weekly Presented by: VTB Bank, Custody April 22, 2021 Issue No. 2021/15 Market News Central bank places RUB 4.98 bln coupon bonds out of RUB 23.6 bln On April 20, 2021 it was reported that Russia’s central bank had sold RUB 4.975 bln out of RUB 23.601 bln coupon bonds during the day. The cut-off and the weighted average prices amounted to 100% of a face value each. Demand totaled RUB 5.017 bln. The settlement date was April 21. Finance Ministry fully places RUB 20 bln OFZ bonds On April 21, 2021 it was stated that Russia’s Finance Ministry had fully placed during the day RUB 20 bln of OFZ 26236 government bonds with a fixed coupon maturing in May 2028. The cut-off price and the weighted average price amounted to 93.11% of a face value. The cut-off yield and the weighted average yield stood at 7.07%. Demand for the bonds totaled RUB 83.7 bln. Company News MTS raises stake to 100% in 6 local fixed-line operators On April 15, 2021 it was stated that Major Russian mobile operator MTS had exercised a call option with provider of broadband and digital TV services Zelenaya Tochka Group to buy out the remaining 49% of the group’s capital in six local fixed-line network operators. Altogether, this deal will provide opportunities to more than one million Russian households to expand access to advanced solutions from across the MTS digital ecosystem. In February 2020, MTS acquired a 51% stake in Zelenaya Tochka Group – comprised of 13 local fixed-line Internet providers – via an agreement that included a provision for a three-year call option on the remaining share capital.
    [Show full text]
  • ECONOMIC BULLETIN Short Term Has No Future
    ECONOMIC BULLETIN Short term has no future 1/28/2011 № DEB-2011.01-03 Economic News • Russia's unemployment hit its highest in seven-months in December but remained well below 2009 highs and looked unlikely to deter the central bank from raising interest rates to fight inflation. The number of unemployed in Russia was 5.39 mln at the end of December, taking the jobless rate to 7.2% from November's 6.7% the previous month, exceeding analysts' forecasts of a 6.8% rate. The data underscores the fragility of the Russian economy's recovery since it suffered its deepest recession in 15 years, hit by the slump in the prices of key exports metals and oil in the wake of the global economic crisis. But, despite blips, the recovery continues. For 2010 as a whole, unemployment averaged 7.5%, higher than the 7% percent forecast by analysts but a definite improvement on the six-year peak of 8.6% recorded in 2009. As such, analysts said the CBR would likely continue to focus more on containing runaway inflation and follow up December's hike in deposit rates with further monetary tightening as soon as its end-January meeting. "It (unemployment spike) is a short-term trend ... and it does not mean that the recovery will deteriorate further," analysts said. "Trade and industrial output data show that the fourth quarter will be better after the 'burnt-out' third quarter due to the weather. "There is a very high chance that the interest rates will continue to be raised..
    [Show full text]
  • Kharkiv, EWJUS, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2020
    Borderland City: Kharkiv Volodymyr Kravchenko University of Alberta Translated from Ukrainian by Marta Olynyk1 Abstract: The article attempts to identify Kharkiv’s place on the mental map of the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union, and traces the changing image of the city in Ukrainian and Russian narratives up to the end of the twentieth century. The author explores the role of Kharkiv in the symbolic reconfiguration of the Ukrainian-Russian borderland and describes how the interplay of imperial, national, and local contexts left an imprint on the city’s symbolic space. Keywords: Kharkiv, city, region, image, Ukraine, Russia, borderland. harkiv is the second largest city in Ukraine after Kyiv. Once (1920-34), K it even managed to replace the latter in its role of the capital of Ukraine. Having lost its metropolitan status, Kharkiv is now an important transport hub and a modern megapolis that boasts a greater number of universities and colleges than any other city in Ukraine. Strategically located on the route from Moscow to the Crimea, Kharkiv became the most influential component of the historical Ukrainian-Russian borderland, which has been a subject of symbolic and political reconfiguration and reinterpretation since the middle of the seventeenth century. These aspects of the city’s history have attracted the attention of numerous scholars (Bagalei and Miller; Iarmysh et al.; Masliichuk). Recent methodological “turns” in the humanities and social sciences shifted the focus of urban studies from the social reality to the city as an imagined social construct and to urban mythology and identity (Arnold; Emden et al.; Low; Nilsson; Westwood and Williams).
    [Show full text]
  • Legislation Company News SECURITIES MARKET NEWS
    SSEECCUURRIIITTIIIEESS MMAARRKKEETT NNEEWWSSLLEETTTTEERR weekly Presented by: VT- -an3, Custody August 20, 2020 Issue No. 2020/32 Legislation Russia, Malta agree to raise tax on dividends, interest to 15% On August 14, 2020 Russia’s Finance Ministry said that Russia and Malta agreed to increase tax on dividends and interest to 15%. On August 13, 2020, the authorities of Russia and Malta agreed on a draft protocol to amend the Convention between the two states on prevention of double taxation and tax avoidance concerning income taxes( and also agreed to increase tax on dividends and interest to 15%, except for a limited list of institutional investment Russian President Vladimir Putin suggested in March imposing a 15% tax on dividend yield withdrawn to accounts in foreign jurisdictions, which would re,uire adjustments to agreements on avoidance of double taxation with other countries Russia will cancel such deals unilaterally if the agreements are not reached On August 10, an agreement on the Russian terms of new taxation deal was reached with Cyprus Company News Mobile operator MTS buys back 0.075% of its share capital On August 14, 2020 it was reported that -astion, a wholly.owned subsidiary of major Russian mobile operator MT0, has ac,uired 1,500,110 MT0 shares, including American depositary receipts, representing 0 015% of the operator’s share capital The shares were ac,uired under the repurchase plan announced on March 31 2nder the Russian law, MT0 must disclose any shares ac,uired by the company or any of its subsidiaries Rosneft
    [Show full text]
  • © Copyright 2020 Volodymyr Sklokin 1 Catherine II, Evdokim Shcherbinin
    1 Catherine II, Evdokim Shcherbinin, and the Abolition of Sloboda Ukraine’s Autonomy1 Volodymyr Sklokin Ivan Ostroz’kyi-Lokhvyts’kyi (1750–1825), the son of the captain of the Slonovka company of the Ostrohoz’k regiment Iosyp Ostroz’kyi-Lokhvyts’kyi, left the following account of the events of 1763 in his memoir: Then a very terrible thunderclap of God’s anger crashed over all the Sloboda regiments in 1763, during the reign of Empress Ekaterina Alekseevna, and a special commission was appointed to the city of Ostrohoz’k over all the officers, of regimental and company rank. Nor did my father, captain Iosyp, escape that thundering stormcloud at that time; those under his command rebelled then and began to write false petitions, and especially at the instigation of the junior ensign Ivan Korets’kyi (who tried to return evil for good, because that captain often saved him from serious troubles, especially bootlegging, and from death itself…). Now [he was] dismissed from command, ordered not to absent himself from the commission, without making any excuses to compensate with many for grievance, even though false, since anything that anyone had given as a gift was regarded as bribery. And thus not waiting for the return of their captain from Ostrohoz’k, the common people began to rob horses from his farmstead, chop down forest acquired by first possession (zaimanshchynnyi), devastate the orchards, beat peasants in the streets for no reason, [and] curse his wife and children to their faces. There was no end to the abuse and insults that he suffered from those under his command, and especially from the relatives of the Korets’kyis, whom he, when they were still poor, provided with everything he had, and also supplied with bread, but they all forgot this and returned evil for good, especially in those evil days, and in all these actions they were the ringleaders and instigators of the common people to evil.2 These events also radically changed the life of Ivan, then a young student at the Kharkiv College.
    [Show full text]
  • The Empire, the Nation
    “The relationship between empire and nation was among the thorniest of questions in the late Russian Em- pire, and the complications proved most acute in the country’s western regions. This volume assembles a The truly international team of scholars to explore these matters in a range of different contexts, from education Edited by and religion to censorship, tourism, and right-wing political mobilization. The chapters reveal an exception- al set of challenges that statesmen, reformers, and imperial subjects of diverse nationalities and confessions Tsar Darius The faced in conceptualizing and actualizing their projects in the context of new forms of association and al- Staliūnas tered political frameworks. As the authors reveal, the greatest casualty for imperial policy was consistency. Full of new research and compelling insights, The Tsar, the Empire, and the Nation represents the latest , The and word on this important problem in Russian and East European history.” Tsar, —Paul W. Werth, Professor of History, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Yoko “By investigating western borderlands from the Baltic provinces in the north to Ukraine in the south, this Empire Aoshima The Empire, volume creates a meso-level between the macro-perspective on the Russian empire as a whole and the mi- cro-perspective on a single region, paving the ground for comparative insights into the empire’s responses and to national questions. What I admire the most about this book is its very balanced discussion of national questions which still bear the potential to become politicized.” , The Nation —Martin Aust, Professor of History, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn, Germany and Dilemmas of Nationalization his book addresses the challenge of modern nationalism to the tsarist Russian Empire that first ap- Russia’s Western The in Tpeared on the empire’s western periphery.
    [Show full text]
  • FCE 37 Ebook
    Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc. 37: 1–20 (2000) Lichenized, lichenicolous and other fungi from North and North- East Greenland Vagn Alstrup1, Eric Steen Hansen1 & Fred J. A. Daniels2 1Botanical Museum, University of Copenhagen, 130 Gothersgade, DK-1123 Copenhagen K, Denmark 2Institute of Plant Ecology, Westfälische Wilhems-Universität, 55 Hindenburgplatz, D-48143 Münster, Germany Abstract: A total of 410 taxa of lichens, lichenicolous fungi and other fungi are reported from fourteen localities in Kronprins Christian Land in North Greenland and Lambert Land in North East Greenland. Four new combinations are made, viz. Aspicilia bennettii, A. expansa, Caloplaca elaeophora and Neuropogon sphacelatus. 60 species of lichens and other fungi are reported as new to Greenland, viz. Acarospora impressula, A. picea, Amphisphaerella erikssonii, Buellia elegans, Carbonea aggregantula, C. atronivea, Catillaria contristans, C. subnegans, Collema coccophorum, Dacampia engeliana, Dactylospora rimulicola, Dermatocarpon luridum, D. meiophyllizum, Didymella praestabilis, Gibbera uliginosa, Ionaspis ventosa, Lecanora cavicola, L. flotowiana, L. perpruinosa, L. umbrina, Lecidella carpathica, Leptogium corniculatum, Leptosphaeria hendersoniae, Leptosphaerulina peltigerae, Lichenostigma semiimmersa, Melanomma sanguinarium, Merismatium heterophractum, M. nigritellum, Peltigera britannica, Pertusaria chiodectonoides, Phomopsis salicina, Physarum oblatum, Placynthium subradiatum, Pleospora graminearum, P. pyrenaica, Polyblastia fuscoargillacea, P. peminosa, P. schisticola,
    [Show full text]
  • THE KREMLIN PLAYBOOK in EUROPE the Kremlin Playbook in Europe Analyzes the Tools and Methods Used by Russia to Exercise Its Influence on the Con- Tinent
    THE KREMLIN PLAYBOOK IN EUROPE The Kremlin Playbook in Europe analyzes the tools and methods used by Russia to exercise its influence on the con- tinent. In particular, it shows how the Kremlin enjoys considerable surrogate power in some countries because of the oligarchization of their governance systems. It also highlights the effect of blinkered national policies which grant Russian capital access to European financial hubs. The report argues for a common transatlantic approach in the face of these threats. The report expands the map of Russia’s footprint built by previous Kremlin Playbooks, which examined Russia’s attempts to capture political and economic decision-making in sixteen European countries, by analyzing Greece and Cyprus. Their strategic location in the southeast of Europe and the eastern Mediterranean, common religious traditions, and historic ties make them an object of influence operations by the Kremlin. Editorial Board: Dr. Ognian Shentov Ruslan Stefanov Martin Vladimirov ISBN: 978-954-477-394-6 © 2020, Center for the Study of Democracy All rights reserved. 5 Alexander Zhendov Str., Sofia 1113 tel.: (+359 2) 971 3000 fax: (+359 2) 971 2233 www.csd.bg, [email protected] ACKNOWLedGEMenTS he comprehensive systematization of the economic data and key policy findings from CSD’s research on Russian influence was the product of the interdisciplinary expertise of CSD’s programs and the meticulous work of Boyko Todorov from the Southeast Europe TLeadership for Development and Integrity (SELDI). The policy analysis in the report has greatly benefitted from the in-depth discussions with Dr. Michael Carpenter, Senior Director of the Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement, and his participation in the round table on countering state capture risks and Russian influence in Europe held in Sofia in November 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM SUGAR BEETS to BANKING: Rusagro's Rise As a Russian
    FROM SUGAR BEETS TO BANKING: Rusagro’s Rise as a Russian Conglomerate June 14, 2010 1 STRATFOR 700 Lavaca Street, Suite 900 Austin, TX 78701 Tel: 1-512-744-4300 www.stratfor.com FROM SUGAR BEETS TO BANKING: Rusagro’s Rise as a Russian Conglomerate Summary Rusagro is one of Russia’s largest agro-industrial holding companies, dealing mainly in sugar, oil and agricultural land. Starting as an intermediary for sugar producers and traders in the former Soviet states, Rusagro’s founder, Vadim Moshkovich, quickly used a sharp eye for opportunities and connections with established and rising businessmen throughout the region to grow Rusagro into a major force in Russia’s agricultural sector. Moshkovich himself has risen from low-level mercantile exchange worker to member of the elite Russian billionaire club and senator. He has been careful in cultivating powerful allies throughout the Kremlin and in powerhouses like Sberbank to promote his or his companies’ interests while holding the same tight-knit circle of loyalists around him for decades. At the end of the day, Moshkovich is interested in profit, and though Rusagro has been his mainstay for more than 15 years, he wants either to continue expanding it across Russia and the former Soviet states or start selling it off -- should the price be right. A Brief History As one of Russia’s largest agro-industrial holding companies, Rusagro has interests in more than 35 farms, seven sugar plants, eight regional trade branches, an oilseed refinery and dairy and pig-farming assets. A member of the Union of Sugar Producers of Russia, Rusagro is known mainly for its sugar and packaged margarine and mayonnaise, which is produced through 35 subsidiaries under well- known Russian brands such as Shchedroye Leto, Chaykovskiy, Khoroshiy and Brauni.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory of Stalinist Purges in Modern Ukraine
    The Gordian Knot of Past and Present: Memory of Stalinist Purges in Modern Ukraine HALYNA MOKRUSHYNA Thesis submitted to the University of Ottawa in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the PdD in Sociology School of Sociological and Anthropological Studies Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa © Halyna Mokrushyna, Ottawa, Canada, 2018 ii Table of Contents Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... iv Preface ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Methodology ....................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Research question ............................................................................................................................................................................ 10 Conceptual framework ................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Chapter 2: Social memory framework .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Aarsens, F. Reysebeschreibung nach(er) Spanien ...deren beigefüget eine nacher Engelland. Trans. Johann Ma(c)kle. Frankfurt: Johann Georg Schiele, 1667. Adams, Julia. The Familial State: Ruling Families and Merchant Capitalism in Early Modern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 2005. ——. “Trading States, Trading Places: The Role of Patrimonialism in Early Mod- ern Dutch Development.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 2, 1994: 319–55. Agricola, Georg. Bergwerck Buch. Basel: Ludwig König, 1621. Aitzema, L. van, L. Sylvius, and others, Saken van Staet en Oorlogh.Second and later eds. The Hague: J. Velly, J. Tongerloo and J. Doll, 1669–1671; Amsterdam: Jan ten Hoorn et al., 1685–99. Aleksandrov V.A. and N.N. Pokrovskii, “Mir Organizations and Administrative Authority in Siberia in the Seventeenth Century,” Soviet Studies in History, Winter 1987–88: 51–93. Aleman, Mateo. Het Leven van Gusman d’Alfarache. 2 vols. Rotterdam: Abraham Pietersz, 1655. ——. Vida y hechos del picaro Guzman de Alfarache. 2 vols. Madrid: Varez de Castro, 1599; Lisboa: Crasbeeck, 1604. Amburger, Erik. Die Familie Marselis, Giessen: Schmitz, 1957. Andreev, I.L. “Sluzhebnyi dialog”: Ideologicheskie aspekty vzaimootnoshenii vlasti i dvorianstva v xvii veke.” In Paleobureaucratica: Sbornik satei k 90-letiiu N.F. Demidovoi. Ed. Iu.M. Eskin. Moskva: Drevlekhranilishche, 2012: 29–55. Archpriest Avvakum: The Life of Archpriest Avvakum Written By Himself.Ed.and trans. K.N. Brostrom. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, 1979. Arkheograficheskaia kommissia. Dopolneniia k aktam istoricheskim. 12 vols. St. Petersburg: E. Prats, 1846–77. Arkheograficheskaia kommissiia. Dela tainago prikaza. Vol. 1 (Russkaia istoricheskaia biblioteka. Vol. 21). St. Petersburg: Glavnoe Upravlenie Udelov, 1907.
    [Show full text]
  • Kharkiv: the Elusive City
    Kharkiv: The Elusive City Volodymyr Kravchenko University of Alberta Oleksiy Musiyezdov V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University his issue opens with a series of special issues of East/West: Journal of T Ukrainian Studies devoted to the largest Ukrainian cities of the eastern and southern regions of Ukraine: Kharkiv, Odesa, Zaporizhzhia, and Dnipro. There are several reasons to believe these cities are key to the future of Ukrainian nation-state building. First, they represent the most developed and urbanized regions located in the huge Ukrainian-Russian historical borderland. Second, they are the products of Russian imperial and Soviet modernization, still unsurpassed by its Ukrainian equivalent. Modern megapolises on the territory of Ukraine started acquiring a more pronounced ethnic-cultural Ukrainian profile only recently, during the “short” twentieth century. It is no wonder that they are still looking for their proper places in post-Soviet Ukraine, while their urban landscapes reflect contradictory visions of their past and future. Third, their dwellers surprised many Kremlin-based nationalists in 2014 during the Russian aggression and annexation of the Crimea when they opted for a Ukrainian nation state rather than the new incarnation of the Russian Empire. Kharkiv occupies a very special place in Ukrainian modern history due to its changing roles as a regional centre and a national capital. During its steady progressive development, which culminated in the twentieth century, Kharkiv became a modern, multi-ethnic, and culturally diverse city, the capital of a historical region known as Sloboda Ukraine, and even served as the capital of the short-lived Soviet Donetsk-Kryvyi Rih Republic (1917-18).
    [Show full text]