0066834 Draft Executive Summary Chinese Revision 6
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TECHNICALPROPOSAL ,-UV EXECUTIVESUMMARY AgreementNo.PLNG13/2007 SurveyonFeatureswithCulturalHeritage AgreementNo.PLNG13/2007 ValueCoveringPartof PlanningDepartment theNorthernNewTerritories YZ[ SurveyonFeatureswithCulturalHeritage DraftExecutiveSummary TheGovernmentoftheHongKongSpecial AdministrativeRegion \]^_︰PLNG13/2007 !"#$%&'()*+,-.-/ ValueintheShaTauKok, TaKwuLingand ,-UVWX MaTsoLungAreas uvwxxyk. lmno*pqrs \]^_︰PLNG13/2007 28th September2007 Qabcd、fgh&ijt k. 0OO 12340567 lmno*pqrs ExecutiveSummary TenderforContractNo.06/9036 ,-UV 17th December2007 0OO 12504517 EnvironmentalResourcesManagement ()IJKLMNOPQRST 21/FLincolnHouse TaikooPlace979King'sRoad IslandEastHongKong ()<=>313? @ABCDEF05GH Telephone89 22713000 Facsimile:; 27235660 www.erm.com Deliveringsustainablesolutionsinamorecompetitiveworld CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 BACKGROUND 1 1.2 STUDY AREA 1 1.3 APPROACH TO THE ASSIGNMENT 1 2 FINDINGS 3 2.1 FEATURES CODING 3 2.2 CLASSIFICATION OF FEATURES WITH CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE 4 2.3 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 5 3 CONCLUSIONS 11 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND The Planning Department commissioned ERM - Hong Kong, Ltd (ERM) to undertake a on Features with Cultural Heritage Value in Sha Tau Kok, Ta Kwu Ling and Ma Tso Lung Areas. The work was undertaken under Agreement No. PLNQ 13/2007 (hereafter referred to as the Assignment). This area, near the boundary with Shenzhen, is not yet covered by any statutory town plan and the establishment of a database of built heritage is therefore important in future land use planning for this area. 1.2 STUDY AREA The Study Area (see Figure 1.2a ) is located in the northern New Territories close to the border with Shenzhen and mostly within the Frontier Closed Area. The Assignment focuses on the Sha Tau Kok area in the east, Ta Kwu Ling area in the centre and Ma Tso Lung/Lok Ma Chau (east of San Sham Road) area in the west 1.3 APPROACH TO THE ASSIGNMENT The Assignment was executed in accordance with Section 6 of the Assignment Brief and made reference to the Antiquities and Monuments Office’s (AMO) practice for conducting built heritage surveys. It serves as the basis for future reference and makes no assessment of the relative value of individual identified features. The general approach to the Assignment included: a desktop study, field survey and reporting phase, each of which is described below. 1.3.1 Desktop Study The objective of the desktop study was to compile an inventory of the features with cultural heritage value or with potential cultural heritage value within the Study Area, comprising: • all pre-1950 buildings and structures; • selected post-1950 buildings and structures of high architectural and historical significance and interest; and • cultural landscape and features including sites of historical events or providing a significant historical record or a setting for buildings or monuments of architectural importance, historic field patterns tracks and fish ponds and cultural elements, such as Fungshui woodlands and clan graves. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 1.3.2 Field Survey Field surveys were conducted between 20 June and 10 December 2007 to identify features with potential cultural heritage value that until now had gone unrecorded. This exercise included field scanning, the taking of photographic records and interviews with village representatives. 1.3.3 Reporting The outcome of the desktop research and field survey findings are presented in the Final Report. This details the features with or with potential cultural heritage value identified within the Study Area. Historical and architectural appraisals, photographic records and location plans are presented in the Final Report. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2 2 FINDINGS 2.1 FEATURES CODING The Study Area is divided into four survey areas: Study Areas A to D as shown in Figure 1.2a. A unique alphanumeric feature code was allocated to each identified feature with or with potential cultural heritage value. Each code was prefixed with a three or four letter code denoting the sub-area: • Study Area A: STK • Study Area B: TKLE • Study Area C: TKLW • Study Area D: MTL For features with or with potential cultural heritage value located within a village, coding using the village name was adopted, for instance, ST01 refers to the first feature identified in Shan Tsui village. Table 2.1a provides a list of these codes. Those features located outside villages and that have not been associated with any local place name were given the purely sub- area/numerical code, for example, STK01 was the first site identified in the Study Area A. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3 Table 2.1a Village/Place Names Used as Feature Codes in the Survey Village/Place Features Code Study Area A Kong Ha ( 崗下) KH Shan Tsui ( 山咀) ST Sheung Tam Shui Hang ( 上担水坑) STSH Ha Tam Shui Hang (下担水坑) HTSH Tsiu Hang (蕉坑) TH Muk Min Tau ( 木棉頭) MMT San Tseun Shueng Wai ( 新村上圍) STSW San Tseun Ha Wai (新村下圍) STHW Tong To ( 塘肚) TT Study Area B Lin Ma Hang ( 蓮麻坑) LMH Heung Yuen Wai ( 香園圍) HYW Ha Heung Yuen ( 下香園) HHY Tsung Yuen Ha ( 松園下) TYH Kan Tau Wai( 簡頭圍) KTW Tong Fong ( 塘坊) TF Study Area C Chow Tin Tsuen ( 週田村) CT Fung Wong Wu ( 鳳凰湖) FWW San Uk Ling ( 新屋嶺) SUL Lei Uk ( 李屋) LU Lo Wu ( 羅湖村) LW Muk Wu ( 木湖) MW Muk Wu Nga Yiu ( 木湖瓦窰) MWNY Sha Ling ( 沙嶺) SL Study Area D Lok Ma Chau ( 落馬洲) LMC Liu Pok ( 料壆) LP 2.2 CLASSIFICATION OF FEATURES WITH OR WITH POTENTIAL CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE Features with or with potential cultural heritage value were categorised as follows: 1. Declared Monuments – statutorily protected against the threat of development under the Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance to enable preservation for posterity; 2. Deemed Monuments – these are features with cultural heritage value where agreements are in place with the owners to ensure preservation. Deemed Monuments can be upgraded to statutory Declared Monuments under the AM Ordinance ; and 3. Graded Historical Buildings – these are historical buildings and structures recorded by AMO according to the grading system summarised in Table 2.2a . ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4 Table 2.2a AMO’s Grading of Historical Buildings Grade Description 1 Buildings of outstanding merit; every effort should be made to preserve these structures if possible. 2 Buildings of special merit; effort should be made to selectively preserve these structures. 3 Buildings of some merit, but which have yet to qualify for consideration as possible monuments. These are to be recorded and used as a pool for future selection. It should be noted that the definitions of gradings are internal guidelines adopted by the Antiquities Advisory Board and the AMO for the preservation of historic buildings but have no statutory standing. Although there are no statutory provisions for the protection of recorded archaeological sites and historical buildings and features (including Deemed, Graded and recorded), administrative procedures are available. Any development proposal affecting these built heritage resources should be submitted to the AMO for comments. 4. Other Features with potential Cultural Heritage Value – Features as defined in Section 1.3.1 (pre 1950s buildings and structures, post 1950s buildings and structures of high architectural/historical significance, other cultural and landscape features) excluding Items 1 to 3 above. 2.3 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 2.3.1 Declared Monuments, Deemed Monuments and Graded Historical Buildings No Declared Monuments or Deemed Monuments were identified within the Study Area. Ten Graded Historical Buildings were identified and are listed in Table 2.3a and shown on Figure 2.3a . Table 2.3a Graded Historical Buildings Identified within the Study Area Features Identified Historical Buildings Sub-Area Location Grade (1) Code and Features ST01 Hip Tin Temple STK Shan Tsui Tsuen 1 STK02 Maclntosh Fort (Pak Kung Au) STK Pak Kung Au, 2 TKLE01 Maclntosh Fort (Kong Shan) TKLE Kong Shan 2 TKLE02 Maclntosh Fort (Pak Fu Shan) TKLE Pak Fu Shan, 2 TKLE03 Ta Kwu Ling Police Station TKLE Ping Che Road 3 TKLW01 Maclntosh Fort (Nga Yiu) TKLW Nga Yiu 2 TKLW02 Maclntosh Fort (Nam Hang) TKLW Nam Hang 2 LMH01 Residence of Ip Ting-sz TKLE Lin Ma Hang 2 Tsuen MTL01 Maclntosh Fort (Ma Tso Lung) LMC Ma Tso Lung 2 MTL02 Lok Ma Chau Police Station LMC Lok Ma Chau 3 (1) See Table 2.2a for Grading Definitions. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5 TKLE02 MacIntosh Fort (Pak Fu Shan) ) STK02 MacIntosh Fort (Pak Kung Au) ) TKLE01 MacIntosh Fort (Kong Shan) ) (! LMH01 Residence of Yip Ting-si ) ST01 Hip Tin Temple BBB AAA TKLW01 MacIntosh Fort (Nga Yiu) ) *# TKLE03 Ta Kwu Ling Police Station ) TKLW02 MacIntosh Fort (Nam Hang) CCC MTL01 MacIntosh Fort (Ma Tso Lung) ) DDD *# MTL02 Lok Ma Chau Police Station KEY Study Area A B C D (! Grade I Historical Building ´ ) Grade II Historical Building Kilometers *# Grade III Historical Building 01 2 Figure 2.3a Environmental Graded Historical Buildings within the Study Area Resources File: 0066834_Grade_Building.mxd Management Date: 06/08/2007 Eight of the ten Graded Historical Buildings identified are either police or military buildings. The military buildings include six forts (STK02, TKLE01, TKLE02, TKLW02, TKLW03 and MTL01) constructed between 1949 and 1953 (1). These were built on prominent hilltops by the southern part of the Shenzhen River and served as observation posts to overlook the border between Hong Kong and mainland China (2). All the forts face the Shenzhen River, are two storeys high and are constructed in a similar style: with a rounded central portion and two side wings on the ground floor. One wing was generally used for sleeping quarters for up to eight people and the other for cooking. Each has a store room. The ground floor of the central area served as a communication or command room and the second floor as an observation tower. Both floors are constructed with ramparts and gun-slot iron openings. Double iron doors are located at the entrance.