DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 170/Wednesday, September 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 170/Wednesday, September 2 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 2, 1998 / Rules and Regulations 46693 the commenters supported the proposed in Docket No. PS±117 or of the present burdensome alternative that achieves action. The commenters agreed with our action is not warranted. the objective of the rule. assessment that the limited safety and B. Regulatory Flexibility Act List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 195 environmental risk of the lines does not warrant applying Part 195 standards on Low stress interfacility transfer lines Ammonia, Carbon dioxide, top of the existing regulatory coverage covered by the present action are Petroleum, Pipeline safety, Reporting by OSHA and the Coast Guard. associated primarily with the operation and recordkeeping requirements. of refineries, petrochemical and other In consideration of the foregoing, Advisory Committee Review industrial plants, and materials RSPA amends 49 CFR Part 195 as We presented the proposed rule transportation terminals. In general, follows: change, including risk assessment and these facilities are not operated by small 1. The authority citation for Part 195 supporting analyses, for consideration entities. Nonetheless, even if small continues to read as follows: by the Technical Hazardous Liquid entities operate low-stress interfacility Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5103, 60102, 60104, Pipeline Safety Standards Committee at transfer lines, their costs will be lower 60108, 60109, 60118; and 49 CFR 1.53. because this action reduces compliance a meeting in Washington, D. C. on May 2. In § 195.1, the introductory text of burdens. Therefore, based on the facts 6, 1998. This statutory advisory paragraph (b) is republished, and committee reviews all safety rules RSPA available about the anticipated impact paragraph (b)(3) is revised to read as proposes for hazardous liquid pipelines. of this rulemaking action, I certify, follows: The Committee comprises 15 members, pursuant to Section 605 of the representing industry, government, and Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. § 195.1 Applicability. the public, who are qualified to evaluate 605), that this rulemaking action will * * * * * hazardous liquid pipeline safety not have a significant economic impact (b) This part does not apply toÐ standards. The Committee voted to on a substantial number of small * * * * * recommend adoption of the proposed entities. (3) Transportation through any of the rule without change. The Committee's C. Executive Orders 13083 and 13084 following low-stress pipelines: report on the matter is available in the (i) An onshore pipeline or pipeline This rule will not have a substantial docket of this proceeding. segment thatÐ direct effect on states, on the (A) Does not transport HVL; Regulatory Analyses and Notices relationship between the Federal (B) Is located in a rural area; and Government and the states, or on the (C) Is located outside a waterway A. Executive Order 12866 and DOT distribution of power and currently used for commercial Policies and Procedures responsibilities among the various navigation; The Office of Management and Budget levels of government, and also would (ii) A pipeline subject to safety (OMB) does not consider this action to not significantly or uniquely affect regulations of the U.S. Coast Guard; or be a significant regulatory action under Indian tribal governments. Therefore, (iii) A pipeline that serves refining, Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 the consultation requirements of manufacturing, or truck, rail, or vessel (58 FR 51735; October 4, 1993). Executive Orders 13083 (``Federalism'') terminal facilities, if the pipeline is less Therefore, OMB has not reviewed this and 13084 (``Consultation and than 1 mile long (measured outside final rule document. DOT does not Coordination with Indian Tribal facility grounds) and does not cross an consider this action significant under its Governments'') do not apply. offshore area or a waterway currently regulatory policies and procedures (44 Nevertheless, because states with used for commercial navigation; FR 11034; February 26, 1979). hazardous liquid pipeline safety * * * * * RSPA prepared a study of the costs programs ultimately monitor the Issued in Washington, D.C. on August 28, 1998. and benefits of the Final Rule that compliance of intrastate pipelines with Kelley S. Coyner, extended Part 195 to cover certain low- the rule, RSPA routinely consults with stress pipelines (Final Regulatory state pipeline safety representatives Administrator. Evaluation, Docket No. PS±117). That during early stages of rulemaking. [FR Doc. 98±23661 Filed 9±1±98; 8:45 am] study, which encompassed short or D. Paperwork Reduction Act BILLING CODE 4910±60±P Coast Guard regulated interfacility This action reduces the pipeline transfer lines, showed that the Final mileage and number of operators subject DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Rule would result in net benefits to to Part 195. Consequently, it reduces the society, with a benefit to cost ratio of information collection burden of Part 1.5. National Oceanic and Atmospheric 195 that is subject to review by OMB Administration The Final Regulatory Evaluation under the Paperwork Reduction Act of determined costs and benefits of the 1995. OMB has approved the 50 CFR Part 226 Final Rule on a mileage basis. But while information collection requirements of costs were evenly distributed, most of [Docket No. 971124276±8202±02; I.D. No. Part 195 through May 31, 1999 (OMB 110797B] the expected benefits were projected No. 2137±0047). from accident data that did not involve RIN 0648±AH88 short or Coast Guard regulated E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of interfacility transfer lines. Since the 1995 Designated Critical Habitat; Green and present action affects only these lines, it This rule does not impose unfunded Hawksbill Sea Turtles is reasonable to believe the action will mandates under the Unfunded AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries reduce more costs than benefits. Thus, Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It does Service (NMFS), NOAA, Commerce. the present action should enhance the not result in costs of $100 million or ACTION: Final rule. net benefits of the Final Rule. Because more to either State, local, or tribal of this likely economic effect, a further governments, in the aggregate, or to the SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Endangered regulatory evaluation of the Final Rule private sector, and is the least Species Act of 1973 (ESA), NMFS is 46694 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 2, 1998 / Rules and Regulations designating critical habitat for the 66584) to designate critical habitat for documented that habitat loss is a threatened green sea turtle (Chelonia the green turtle to include coastal waters primary factor slowing the recovery of mydas) to include coastal waters out to 3 nautical miles (nm) surrounding the species throughout its range. surrounding Culebra Island, Puerto Culebra Island, Puerto Rico, and for the Degradation of seagrass beds has slowed Rico, and the endangered hawksbill sea hawksbill turtle to include coastal recovery of green turtles in the turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) to waters out to 3 nm surrounding Mona Caribbean due to reduced carrying include coastal waters surrounding and Monito Islands, Puerto Rico. capacity of seagrass meadows (Williams, Mona and Monito Islands, Puerto Rico. NMFS also completed an EA, 1988). Therefore, the extent of habitat This designation of critical habitat pursuant to the National Environmental required for foraging green turtles is provides explicit notice to Federal Policy Act, to evaluate both the likely to be increasing due to the agencies and to the public that these environmental and economic impacts of reduced productivity of remaining areas and features are vital to the the proposed critical habitat seagrass beds. conservation of the species. designation. The EA resulted in a Seagrasses are the principal dietary DATES: Effective October 2, 1998. finding of no significant impact for the component of juvenile and adult green proposed action. turtles throughout the Wider Caribbean ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of this The proposed rule provided for a 60- region (Bjorndal, 1995). The seagrass final rule and/or the Environmental day public comment period. During the beds of Culebra consist primarily of Assessment (EA) should be addressed to comment period, public hearings were turtle grass (Thalassia testudinum). Barbara Schroeder, National Sea Turtle held in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, on While seagrasses are distributed Coordinator, Office of Protected January 26, 1998, in San Juan, Puerto throughout temperate and tropical Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Rico, on January 27, 1998, and in latitudes, turtle grass beds are a tropical Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Culebra, Puerto Rico, on January 29, phenomenon. In the Caribbean, turtle FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 1998. After consideration of the public grass beds consist primarily of turtle Michelle Rogers, 301±713±1401 or comments, NMFS is designating critical grass, but may include other species of Colleen Coogan, 727±570±5312. habitat for green and hawksbill turtles seagrass, such as manatee grass SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: as described in the proposed rule (see (Syringodium filiforme), shoal grass Background Proposed Critical Habitat; Geographic (Halodule wrightii), and sea vine Extent section of this rule). (Halophila decipiens), as well as several Green and hawksbill turtles are In accordance with the July 18, 1977, species of algae including green algae of largely restricted to tropical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Status of Sea Turtles Listed Under
    STATUS REVIEWS OF SEA TURTLES LISTED UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973: Loggerhead Turtle, Caretta caretta East Pacific Green Turtle, Chelonia mydas Leatherback Turtle, Dermochelys coriacea Hawksbill Turtle, Eretmochelys imbricata Kemp's Ridley Turtle, Lepidochelys kempii Olive Ridley Turtle, Lepidochelys olivacea United States Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Silver Spring, Maryland United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Washington D.C. Literature citations should read as follows: Plotkin, P.T. (Editor). 1995. National Marine Fisheries Service and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Status Reviews for Sea Turtles Listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, Maryland Pamela T. Plotkin, Ph.D., Editor, National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Protected Species, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910 Current Address: Pamela T. Plotkin, Ph.D. University of Delaware, Department of Entomology and Applied Ecology, 240 Townsend Hall, Newark, DE. Additional copies of this plan may be purchased from: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 Grosvenor Lane Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 (301)492-6403 or 1-800-582-3421 The fee for the Status Review will vary depending on the current page charges. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ......................................... iii Executive Summary ........................................ iv Loggerhead Sea Turtle ....................................... 1 East Pacific Green Sea Turtle ................................. 24 Leatherback Sea Turtle ...................................... 37 Hawksbill .............................................. 76 Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle ................................... 109 Olive Ridley Sea Turtle .................................... 123 iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction. Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act requires that National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Culebra National Wildlife Refuge
    Culebra National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region September 2012 COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN CULEBRA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Culebra, Puerto Rico U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia September 2012 Culebra National Wildlife Refuge TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN I. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................1 Purpose and Need for the Plan ....................................................................................................1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ......................................................................................................2 National Wildlife Refuge System ..................................................................................................2 Legal and Policy Context ..............................................................................................................4 Legal Mandates, Administrative and Policy Guidelines, and Other Special Considerations .......................................................................................................4 National and International Conservation Plans and Initiatives .....................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species Act Biological Assessment and Essential Fish Habitat Evaluation Use of Oil Spill Dispersants and In-Situ
    Endangered Species Act Biological Assessment And Essential Fish Habitat Evaluation Use of Oil Spill Dispersants And In-Situ Burning As Part of Response Actions Considered By the Caribbean Regional Response Team Prepared by: CRRT Response Technologies Committee October 2015 Biological Assessment and Essential Fish Habitat Evaluation Use of Oil Spill Dispersants and In-Situ Burning as Part of Response Actions Considered by the Caribbean Regional Response Team Table of Contents I. Description of Proposed Actions 1 A. Concurrence and Consultation Requirements under NCP Subpart J 1 B. CRRT Dispersant Preauthorization Agreements 2 C. Consensus Conditional Zones for Dispersant Consideration 3 D. CRRT Policy for the Use of In-Situ Burning 4 E. Description of Dispersants 5 F. Chemical Constituents in Dispersants 7 G. Toxicity of Dispersants 9 H. Toxicity of Chemically Dispersed Oil 10 I. Biodegradation of Dispersants and Dispersed Oil 12 J. Description of In-Situ Burning 16 II. Species and Habitat within the Action Area 18 A. Description of ESA-Listed Species Present 18 1. Sea Turtles 18 2. Marine Mammals 20 3. Fish 28 4. Corals 31 B. Essential Fish Habitat 35 1. Specific Areas that May be Affected by Oil Spill Response Operations 35 2. Life History of Spiny Lobster 37 3. Life History of Queen Conch 37 4. Life History of Corals 38 5. Life History of Reef Fish 40 III. Analysis of the Effects of the Proposed Actions 42 A. Potential Effects of Oil 42 1. Effects of Oil on Species 42 a. Sea Turtles 42 b. Marine Mammals (Cetaceans) 43 c. Fish 44 d.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 1997 / Proposed Rules
    66584 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 1997 / Proposed Rules Author: The primary author of this 3. Thursday, January 29, 1998Ð throughout the Caribbean, green and notice is Paul Hartfield (see ADDRESSES Center for Multiple Use, Williamson hawksbill turtle populations have section). Street, Culebra, Puerto Rico. diminished to the point where they may ADDRESSES: likely be extirpated from this area. The Authority Comments and requests for a copy of the environmental assessment green turtle is listed as threatened under The authority for this action is the (EA) for this proposed rule should be the ESA, except for the Florida and Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 addressed to Barbara Schroeder, Pacific coast of Mexico breeding U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). National Sea Turtle Coordinator, Office populations, which are listed as Dated: December 11, 1997. of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 endangered. The hawksbill turtle is H. Dale Hall, East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD listed as endangered throughout its Acting Regional Director, Fish and Wildlife 20910. range. Service. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Additionally, green and hawksbill [FR Doc. 97±33140 Filed 12±18±97; 8:45 am] Michelle Rogers, 301±713±1401 or turtles, as well as other marine turtle BILLING CODE 4310±55±P Bridget Mansfield, 813±570±5312. species, are protected internationally SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Background Fauna and Flora (CITES). Without these On February 14, 1997, NMFS protections, it is highly unlikely that National Oceanic and Atmospheric announced the receipt of a petition either species, traditionally highly Administration presenting substantial information to prized in the Caribbean for their flesh, warrant a review (62 FR 6934) to fat, eggs, and shell, would exist today.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribbean Skinks Listing Petition
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR PETITION TO LIST NINE SPECIES OF CARIBBEAN SKINKS AS ENDANGERED UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Puerto Rican Skink (Spondylurus nitidus) at Guajataca State Forest in Quebradilllas, Puerto Rico. © Puerto Rico Wildlife: Alfredo Colón. Http://alfredocolon.zenfolio.com. CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY February 11, 2014 i Notice of Petition _____________________________________________________________________________ Sally Jewell, Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Dan Ashe, Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Douglas Krofta, Chief Branch of Listing, Endangered Species Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Room 420 4401 North Fairfax Drive Arlington, VA 22203 [email protected] Cindy Dohner, Regional Director Region 4 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1875 Century Boulevard NE, Suite 400 Atlanta, GA 30345 [email protected] PETITIONERS Collette L. Adkins Giese Amphibian and Reptile Senior Attorney Center for Biological Diversity PO Box 339 Circle Pines, MN 55014-0339 [email protected] Tierra Curry Senior Scientist Center for Biological Diversity PO Box 11374 Portland, OR 97211 [email protected] ii Dr. Renata Platenberg Reptile Ecologist St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands [email protected] Submitted this 11th day of February, 2014 Pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1533(b); Section 553(e) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553(e); and 50 C.F.R. § 424.14(a), the Center for Biological Diversity and Dr. Renata Platenberg hereby petition the Secretary of the Interior, through the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”), to list nine species of Caribbean skinks as endangered species and to designate critical habitat to ensure recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • De Adaptación Al Cambio Climático 0XqlflslrGh&Xoheud
    PLAN PILOTO COMUNITARIO DE ADAPTACIÓN AL CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO 0XQLFLSLRGH&XOHEUD Preparado por: Contenido Síntesis de la vulnerabilidad Perfil de Culebra: Situación base para determinar la vulnerabilidadɕ Informe de resultados del taller de cartografía participativa ɕInforme de resultados 1 de entrevistas a líderes de opiniónɕÍndice de vulnerabilidad social ɕResultados de escenarios aumento del nivel del mar y efecto combinado de marejada ciclónica y aumento en los niveles del mar 2 Estrategias de adaptación Materiales asociados a la participación ciudadana y la 3 consulta pública SÍNTESIS DE LA VULNERABILIDAD 2016 Contenido 1. Introducción .................................................................................................. 3 Trasfondo ....................................................................................................................... 3 ¿Por qué Culebra? ........................................................................................................ 3 2. Proceso de desarrollo del plan de adaptación ......................................... 5 3. Lineamientos para determinar la vulnerabilidad en Culebra ................... 8 3.1 ¿Quién o qué es vulnerable? ............................................................................. 8 3.2 ¿A qué son vulnerables los sistemas naturales, las comunidades y negocios en Culebra? ..................................................................................................... 9 3.3 ¿Cuáles serían los impactos directos e indirectos en Culebra? ................
    [Show full text]
  • Swimming Against the Tide: Recent Surveys of Exploitation, Trade, and Management of Marine Turtles in the Northern Caribbean
    Swimming Against the Tide: Recent Surveys of Exploitation, Trade, And Management of Marine Turtles In the Northern Caribbean By Elizabeth H. Fleming This prepublication copy contains the full final text of the report. The final publication will contain additional maps and photographs. TRAFFIC North America April 2001 Published by TRAFFIC North America Washington, D.C., USA © 2001 TRAFFIC North America All rights reserved. ISBN 0-89164-161-0 All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be produced with permission. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must credit TRAFFIC North America as the copyright owner. The views of the authors expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC Network, World Wildlife Fund (WWF), or IUCN-The World Conservation Union. The designations of geographical entities in this publication and the presentation of material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership is held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint program of WWF and IUCN. Cover photograph by Ursula Keuper-Bennett and Peter Bennett Design by Williams Production Group Printed on recycled paper. CONTENTS FOREWORD ....................................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This Article
    Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN: 0034-7744 ISSN: 0034-7744 Universidad de Costa Rica Hernández-Alcántara, Pablo; Cruz-Pérez, Ismael-Narciso; Solís-Weiss, Vivianne Eunicida and Amphinomida polychaetes (Annelida) inhabiting dead coral fragments in the Chinchorro Bank Biosphere Reserve, Mexican Caribbean Revista de Biología Tropical, vol. 67, no. 5, 2019, pp. 16-38 Universidad de Costa Rica DOI: DOI 10.15517/RBT.V67IS5.38923 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44965909002 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative DOI 10.15517/RBT.V67IS5.38923 Artículo Eunicida and Amphinomida polychaetes (Annelida) inhabiting dead coral fragments in the Chinchorro Bank Biosphere Reserve, Mexican Caribbean Poliquetos de Eunicida y Amphinomida (Annelida) que habitan fragmentos de coral muertos en la Reserva de Biosfera del Banco Chinchorro, Caribe Mexicano Pablo Hernández-Alcántara1 Ismael-Narciso Cruz-Pérez2 Vivianne Solís-Weiss3 1. Unidad Académica de Ecología y Biodiversidad Acuática, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Circuito Exterior S/N, Cd. Universitaria, Ciudad de México, 04510, México, [email protected] 2. Facultad de Estudios Superiores Zaragoza, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Batalla 5 de mayo S/N esquina Fuerte de Loreto, Colonia Ejército de Oriente, C.P. 09230, Ciudad de México, México, [email protected] 3. Unidad Académica de Sistemas Arrecifales, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Culebra Island, Puerto Rico
    Geology of Culebra Island, Puerto Rico by Thomas H. Banks A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Houston, Texas May 1962 -i- TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ill ABSTRACT ...........o......e... V INTRODUCTION 1 Previous Work ••••• 2 Geography ................... 3 Geomorphology 4 Acknowledgements 6 SUMMARY OF STRATIGRAPHY OF CULEBRA 8 CULEBRA ANDESITES . 10 Introduction ....... 10 Andesite Flows •••••••••••••«*••• 10 Thickness of Flows 11 Structure and Formation of Pillows ••••••• 12 Mineralogy of the Flows 17 Petrography of the Flows .••••...•.•• 31 Pyroclastic Rocks •....•••••••••.. 35 Mineralogy of the Pyroclastics 39 Petrography of the Pyroclastics 4l CERRO BALCON FORMATION 42 Mineralogy ••••» ..... 43 Petrography • . 46 CAYO NORTE FORMATION 48 Mineralogy and Petrography •••«. 48 IGNEOUS INTRUSIVES 50 Mineralogy and Petrography of the Diorites ... 51 Mineralogy and Petrography of the Spilites ... 52 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY . 54 GEOLOGIC HISTORY 57 -ii- Page COMPARISON OF THE CULEBRA ANDESITES WITH OTHER BASALTS AND ANDESITES AND THE PROBLEM OF THE ORIGEN OF OROGENIC ANDESITES ........ 59 APPENDIX. THIN SECTION DESCRIPTIONS 65 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 7^ -iii- LIST OP ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1 Map showing location of area •••••••• 5 2 Cerro Balcon from Cayo Norte • ••<>•••• 7 3 Stratigraphy of Culebra .......... 9 4 Andesite pillows connected by narrow necks 13 5 Large pillows on Cayo Norte 14 6 Andesite lavas on Culebrita ........ 15 7 Plagioclase compositions plotted against stratigraphic position ......... 19 8 "Honey-combed structure” in Japanese plagioclase .......... 21 9 Plagioclase phenocrysts with groundmass inclusions .......... 23 10 Plagioclase with groundmass inclusions ... 24 11 Composition of clinopyroxenes ....... 29 12 Thin section of porphyritic augite andesite lava ...... 32 13 Same, greater magnification 33 14 Pseudomorphs after olivine in porphyritic augite andesite • .
    [Show full text]
  • Green Sea Turtle (Chelonia Mydas)
    GREEN SEA TURTLE (CHELONIA MYDAS) 5-YEAR REVIEW: SUMMARY AND EVALUATION NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE OFFICE OF PROTECTED RESOURCES SILVER SPRING, MARYLAND AND U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE SOUTHEAST REGION JACKSONVILLE ECOLOGICAL SERVICES FIELD OFFICE JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA AUGUST 2007 U.S. Department of Commerce U.S. Department of the Interior National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION.................................................................................. 1 1.1 Reviewers . .......................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology Used to Complete the Review ................................................. 1 1.3 Background .................................................................................................... 1 1.3.1 FR notice citation announcing initiation of this review . 1 1.3.2 Listing history . 1 1.3.3 Associated rulemakings .. 2 1.3.4 Review history . .. 2 1.3.5 Species' recovery priority number at start of review .. 2 1.3.6 Recovery plans . .. 3 2.0 REVIEW ANALYSIS............................................................................................. 3 2.1 Application of the 1996 Distinct Population Segment (DPS) Policy............. 3 2.1.1 Is the species under review a vertebrate? ............................................ 3 2.1.2 Is the species under review listed as a DPS?....................................... 3 2.1.3 Is there relevant new information for this
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop on Telepresence-Enabled Exploration of the Caribbean Region White Paper Submissions
    Workshop on Telepresence-enabled Exploration of the Caribbean Region White Paper Submissions Ocean Exploration Trust October 5, 2012 Contents 1 Overview 4 2 Region 1: Yucat´anto Bahamas 6 2.1 Yucat´ancontinental slope and Yucat´anbasin ................. 6 2.2 Relict Reefs .................................... 8 2.3 Campeche and Yucat´anEscarpments ...................... 9 2.4 Escarpment biodiversity along the Campeche Bank .............. 11 2.5 Offshore sinkholes and caves Yucat´anMexico ................. 13 2.6 Yucat´anStrait .................................. 14 2.7 Chinchorro Bank Biosphere Reserve ...................... 16 2.8 Shipwrecks of the Belizean Cayes & coastal deep waters ........... 18 2.9 Belize Barrier Reef and the Gulf of Honduras ................. 19 2.10 Oil & gas cold seep benthic communities .................... 22 2.11 Exploring hidden ecosystems in the Straits of Florida ............. 23 2.12 The Exuma Sound ................................ 26 2.13 North Bahamas to Dominican Republic .................... 29 2.14 Using ROVs to explore Bahamas Blue Holes .................. 31 2.15 Mesophotic coral ecosystem ........................... 32 3 Region 2: Cayman Rise to Greater Antilles 35 3.1 Mid Cayman Rise ................................ 36 3.2 Cayman Trough ................................. 37 3.3 Gonave Bay, Haiti ................................ 37 3.4 Bobadilla’s Fleet ................................. 39 3.5 Mona Passage, Puerto Rico ........................... 40 3.6 Mona Channel .................................. 42 3.7 Puerto Rico Trench and Muertos Trough .................... 44 3.8 Glacial Shorelines and Reefs on Insular Slopes ................. 46 3.9 Corals as an indicator of SST Variation .................... 48 3.10 Anegada-Jungfern Passage Complex ...................... 50 2 CONTENTS 3 3.11 U.S. EEZ around Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands ............. 52 3.12 Spawning aggregation of mutton snapper ................... 55 3.13 Exploration of deep water fauna off the Virgin Islands shelf ........
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Framework for Sea Turtle Restoration Activities
    Deepwater Horizon Oil Si p ll Natural Resource Damage Assessment Strategic Framework for Sea Turtle Restoration Activities June 2017 The Deepwater Horizon (DWH) oil spill Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) Trustees (Trustees) developed a set of strategic frameworks for oysters, birds, marine mammals, and sea turtles to provide context for prioritization, sequencing, and selection of projects within future Trustee Implementation Group (TIG) restoration plans. The strategic frameworks also consider coordination across Restoration Areas, common monitoring standards and approaches, and opportunities for adaptive management. As established in the DWH oil spill Programmatic Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PDARP/PEIS), these frameworks will help the Trustees consider each resource at the ecosystem level, while implementing restoration at the local level. The Regionwide TIG authorized the creation of these strategic frameworks to promote information sharing and coordination across TIGs for the four resources (oysters, birds, marine mammals, and sea turtles) that will receive restoration funding allocated to the Regionwide TIG. The Trustees also anticipate that the strategic frameworks will be useful for restoration planning and implementation by all TIGs. Developed by teams of Trustee scientists and resource experts, each framework includes four modules with information for the TIGs to consider for planning, implementing, and monitoring restoration activities: Module 1: A brief summary
    [Show full text]