Takayuki Ohgushi · Susanne Wurst Scott N. Johnson Editors Aboveground– Belowground Community Ecology Ecological Studies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Takayuki Ohgushi · Susanne Wurst Scott N. Johnson Editors Aboveground– Belowground Community Ecology Ecological Studies Ecological Studies 234 Takayuki Ohgushi · Susanne Wurst Scott N. Johnson Editors Aboveground– Belowground Community Ecology Ecological Studies Analysis and Synthesis Volume 234 Series editors Martyn M. Caldwell Logan, Utah, USA Sandra Díaz Cordoba, Argentina Gerhard Heldmaier Marburg, Germany Robert B. Jackson Stanford, California, USA Otto Ludwig Lange Würzburg, Germany Delphis F. Levia Newark, Delaware, USA Harold A. Mooney Stanford, California, USA Ernst-Detlef Schulze Jena, Germany Ulrich Sommer Kiel, Germany Ecological Studies is Springer’s premier book series treating all aspects of ecology. These volumes, either authored or edited collections, appear several times each year. They are intended to analyze and synthesize our understanding of natural and managed ecosystems and their constituent organisms and resources at different scales from the biosphere to communities, populations, individual organisms and molecular interactions. Many volumes constitute case studies illustrating and syn- thesizing ecological principles for an intended audience of scientists, students, environmental managers and policy experts. Recent volumes address biodiversity, global change, landscape ecology, air pollution, ecosystem analysis, microbial ecology, ecophysiology and molecular ecology. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/86 Takayuki Ohgushi • Susanne Wurst • Scott N. Johnson Editors Aboveground–Belowground Community Ecology Editors Takayuki Ohgushi Susanne Wurst Center for Ecological Research Functional Biodiversity, Institute of Biology Kyoto University Freie Universität Shiga, Japan Berlin, Germany Scott N. Johnson Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment Western Sydney University Penrith, New South Wales, Australia ISSN 0070-8356 ISSN 2196-971X (electronic) Ecological Studies ISBN 978-3-319-91613-2 ISBN 978-3-319-91614-9 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91614-9 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018952137 © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland Foreword For long, community ecologists have considered the world from either an above- ground or a belowground perspective. During most of the twentieth century, above- ground and belowground studies had their own specific research questions while apparently ignoring conceptual developments and approaches in the neighboring subsystem. Certain aspects have been almost exclusively studied in one of the two subsystems. For example, evolutionary studies and multi-trophic interactions have been studied mostly aboveground, whereas belowground studies have been strongly focused on decomposition, mutualistic symbionts, and determining flows and fluxes of carbon and nutrients through feeding guilds in soil food webs. Already in 1960, the Green World Hypothesis by Hairston, Smith, and Slobodkin included both aboveground and belowground components, and in the end of the 1980s, Valerie Brown, Alan Gange, and coworkers showed how belowground and aboveground insecticides had differential effects on secondary succession in restored grasslands. At the same time, research on plant–soil feedback interactions generated interest in unraveling the contribution of belowground biota to plant community dynamics and ecosystem development. Then came the turn of the millennium and work on aboveground–belowground interactions took off, first mainly driven by soil ecologists and soon joined in by plant ecologists and entomologists. First studies involved relatively simple experi- ments with plants, insects aboveground, and insects belowground, soon expanding complexity with numbers of insect species, types of functional groups, and also other taxa, such as nematodes, mycorrhizal fungi, and, later, plant pathogens. Most of these studies were undertaken first by ecologists, followed by molecular biologists using their model species to unravel how signal transduction pathways and other molecular mechanisms make aboveground and belowground biota interact. Agron- omists stepped in relatively late, so that many of the aboveground–belowground interactions still remain to be tested under farmers’ field conditions. Most likely, interest will grow and the concept of plant phytobiomes, which has been success- fully coined by phytopathologists, may further boost the application of aboveground–belowground interactions in production ecosystems. v vi Foreword The current multi-authored book, edited by Takayuki Ohgushi, Susanne Wurst, and Scott Johnson, combines a great variety of highly interesting chapters on aspects of aboveground–belowground interactions, from plant–soil feedbacks to ecological, evolutionary, and theoretical aspects of interactions between plants, aboveground and belowground herbivores, pathogens, mutualistic symbionts, and decomposers. This is a very timely overview of current approaches of aboveground–belowground ecology that will stimulate both ecologists to consider these interactions in their own studies, as well as that it will promote application in crop protection in both agri- and horticulture, as well as in grassland management. The book also provides interesting study material to students, thereby stimulating integral thinking about biodiversity conservation, eco-evolutionary dynamics, and sustainable food and feed production. Netherlands Institute of Ecology Wim H. van der Putten Wageningen, The Netherlands Contents 1 Linking Aboveground–Belowground Ecology: A Short Historical Perspective ................................... 1 Richard D. Bardgett 2 Belowground Experimental Approaches for Exploring Aboveground–Belowground Patterns ....................... 19 Scott N. Johnson, Felicity V. Crotty, James M. W. Ryalls, and Philip J. Murray 3 Modeling Aboveground–Belowground Interactions ............. 47 Katrin M. Meyer 4 Intraspecific Plant–Soil Feedbacks Link Ecosystem Ecology and Evolutionary Biology ................................ 69 Jennifer A. Schweitzer, Michael Van Nuland, and Joseph K. Bailey 5 Fungal-Mediated Above–Belowground Interactions: The Community Approach, Stability, Evolution, Mechanisms, and Applications ....................................... 85 Alison E. Bennett, Peter Orrell, Antonino Malacrino, and Maria José Pozo 6 Interactions Involving Rhizobacteria and Foliar-Feeding Insects ............................................... 117 Kiran R. Gadhave and Alan C. Gange 7 Belowground–Aboveground Interactions Between Pathogens and Herbivores ........................................ 135 Bastien Castagneyrol, Pilar Fernandez-Conradi, Pil U. Rasmussen, Cécile Robin, and Ayco J. M. Tack 8 Soil Macro-Invertebrates: Their Impact on Plants and Associated Aboveground Communities in Temperate Regions ............. 175 Susanne Wurst, Ilja Sonnemann, and Johann G. Zaller vii viii Contents 9 The Feedback Loop Between Aboveground Herbivores and Soil Microbes via Deposition Processes ................... 201 Cari A. Ritzenthaler, Caitlin E. Maloney, Audrey M. Maran, Eric A. Moore, Amanda Winters, and Shannon L. Pelini 10 Eco-evolutionary Factors Driving Plant-Mediated Above–Belowground Invertebrate Interactions Along Elevation Gradients ..................................... 223 Alan Kergunteuil, Moe Bakhtiari, and Sergio Rasmann 11 Cross-Compartment Herbivory Effects on Antagonists and Mutualists and Their Consequences for Plant Fitness ........ 247 Nicholas A. Barber 12 Eco-evolutionary Dynamics of Above- and Belowground Herbivores and Invasive Plants ............................ 271 Wei Huang, Evan Siemann, and Jianqing Ding 13 Soil Biota as Drivers of Plant Community Assembly ............ 293 Paul Kardol, Jonathan R. De Long, and Pierre Mariotte 14 Application and Theory of Plant–Soil Feedbacks on Aboveground Herbivores .............................. 319 Ian Kaplan, Ana Pineda, and Martijn Bezemer 15 Current Knowledge and Future Challenges of Aboveground and Belowground Community Ecology ...................... 345 Takayuki Ohgushi, Susanne Wurst, and Scott N. Johnson Index ................................................... 363 Chapter 1 Linking Aboveground–Belowground Ecology: A Short Historical Perspective Richard D. Bardgett 1.1 Introduction The last few decades have
Recommended publications
  • 4Th National IPM Symposium
    contents Foreword . 2 Program Schedule . 4 National Roadmap for Integrated Pest Management (IPM) . 9 Whole Systems Thinking Applied to IPM . 12 Fourth National IPM Symposium . 14 Poster Abstracts . 30 Poster Author Index . 92 1 foreword Welcome to the Fourth National Integrated Pest Management The Second National IPM Symposium followed the theme “IPM Symposium, “Building Alliances for the Future of IPM.” As IPM Programs for the 21st Century: Food Safety and Environmental adoption continues to increase, challenges facing the IPM systems’ Stewardship.” The meeting explored the future of IPM and its role approach to pest management also expand. The IPM community in reducing environmental problems; ensuring a safe, healthy, has responded to new challenges by developing appropriate plentiful food supply; and promoting a sustainable agriculture. The technologies to meet the changing needs of IPM stakeholders. meeting was organized with poster sessions and workshops covering 22 topic areas that provided numerous opportunities for Organization of the Fourth National Integrated Pest Management participants to share ideas across disciplines, agencies, and Symposium was initiated at the annual meeting of the National affiliations. More than 600 people attended the Second National IPM Committee, ESCOP/ECOP Pest Management Strategies IPM Symposium. Based on written and oral comments, the Subcommittee held in Washington, DC, in September 2001. With symposium was a very useful, stimulating, and exciting experi- the 2000 goal for IPM adoption having passed, it was agreed that ence. it was again time for the IPM community, in its broadest sense, to come together to review IPM achievements and to discuss visions The Third National IPM Symposium shared two themes, “Putting for how IPM could meet research, extension, and stakeholder Customers First” and “Assessing IPM Program Impacts.” These needs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sur Hamp Peter 25 Ju Autho Rvey of Th Pton Brow Borough Ne 2015
    A survey of the inverttebrates of the Hampton brownfield study site, Peterborough 25 June 2015 Authors: Buglife and BSG Ecology BLANK PAGE Acknowledgements: Buglife and BSG would like to thank O&H Hampton Ltd for undertaking the habitat creation work and providing access and support Report title A survey of the invertebrates of the Hampton brownfield study site, Peterborough Draft version/final FINAL File reference OH Hampton Draft Report_Final_240715 Buglife - The Invertebrate Conservation Trust is a registered charity at Bug House, Ham Lane, Orton Waterville, Peterborough, PE2 5UU Company no. 4132695, Registered charity no. 1092293, Scottish charity no. SC04004 BSG Ecology - Registered in: England and Wales | No. OC328772 | Registered address: Wyastone Business Park, Monmouth, NP25 3SR Contents 1 Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 3 3 Site Description ............................................................................................................................................. 4 4 Methods ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 5 Results ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 56 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Autumn 2003 Scheme Organisers Tipuloidea & Ptychopteridae - Cranefly Dr. R.K.A.Morris Mr A E Stubbs [email protected] 181 Broadway Peterborough PE1 4DS Summer 2003: Please notify Dr Mark Hill of changes: Ivan Perry BRC (CEH) [ ][ ] 27 Mill Road, Lode, Cambridge, CB5 9EN. Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, co-organiser: John Kramer Tel: 01223 812438 Cambridgeshire PE28 2LS (Tel. 01487 772413) 31 Ash Tree Road Autumn 2003, Summer 2004: [email protected] Oadby, Leicester, LE2 5TE Peter Chandler Recording Schemes Sciomyzidae - Snail-killing Flies Symposium Graham Rotheray This year will see some substantial changes in the National Museums of Scotland, Chambers Street, Dr I F G McLean ways in which some Recording Scheme Organisers Edinburgh EH1 1JF, 0131.247.4243 109 Miller Way, Brampton, Huntingdon, Cambs archive and exchange records. Whilst all will read- [email protected] ily accept records in written form the following PE28 4TZ Membership symbols are used to indicate some of the known (or [email protected] surmised) methods by which Scheme Organisers [email protected] may currently receive records electronically: Mr A.P. Foster Mr M. Parker 23 The Dawneys, Crudwell, Malmesbury, Wiltshire 9 East Wyld Road, Weymouth, Dorset, DT4 0RP Recorder SN16 9HE Dipterists Digest MapMate [][][] Microsoft Access Darwyn Sumner Peter Chandler 606B Berryfield Lane, Melksham, Wilts SN12 6EL Spreadsheet
    [Show full text]
  • Asparagus Miner
    Extension Bulletin E-3143 New • January 2011 Asparagus Miner Asparagus Miner Life History Ophiomyia simplex Loew and Life Cycle (Diptera: Agromyzidae) In Michigan, asparagus miners overwin- ter as pupae in mined asparagus stem debris (Lampert, Cress, & Haynes, 1984). Introduction Two complete generations take place in The asparagus miner was introduced Michigan in each growing season (Lam- into North America from Europe, and MASON pert et al., 1984; Tuell & Hausbeck, 2008). OCEANA was first found along the northeast coast Adult flies normally emerge in late May of the United States in 1869. This pest INGHAM to early June, and reach their first peak has two full generations per growing ALLEGAN VAN BUREN abundance around mid-June (see figure season in Michigan (Tuell & Hausbeck, on page 3). Shortly after emerging, the 2008), and asparagus is its only known CASS adults mate and the females lay eggs near host (Chittenden, 1898). The asparagus Figure 1. Known distribution of the the base of asparagus stems, either right miner has been recorded in every county asparagus miner in Michigan. above or just below the soil surface. in Michigan where there is commercial asparagus production, including Mason, Oceana, Van Buren, Allegan and Cass counties (see Figure 1). This factsheet provides general information on the biology of the asparagus miner and options for its management. Identification Adult asparagus miner flies are shiny black and about 3.5 mm to 5 mm long (see Figure 2). Their eggs are difficult to detect because they are small and translucent, later taking on the color of the asparagus stem. Females lay the eggs under the outer layer of stems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ground Beetle Fauna (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of Southeastern Altai R
    ISSN 0013-8738, Entomological Review, 2010, Vol. 90, No. 8, pp. ???–???. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2010. Original Russian Text © R.Yu. Dudko, A.V. Matalin, D.N. Fedorenko, 2010, published in Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 2010, Vol. 89, No. 11, pp. 1312–1330. The Ground Beetle Fauna (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of Southeastern Altai R. Yu. Dudkoa, A. V. Matalinb, and D. N. Fedorenkoc aInstitute of Animal Systematics and Ecology, Siberian Division, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 630091 Russia bMoscow Pedagogical State University, Moscow, 129243 Russia e-mail: [email protected] cInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119071 Russia Received October 1, 2009 Abstract—Long-term studies of the ground beetle fauna of Southeastern Altai (SEA) revealed 33 genera and 185 species; 3 and 15 species are reported for the first time from Russia and SEA, respectively. The following gen- era are the most diverse: Bembidion (47 species), Amara and Harpalus (21 each), Pterostichus (14), and Nebria (13). The subarid (35%) and boreal (32%) species prevail in the arealogical spectrum, while the mountain endem- ics comprise 13% of the fauna. The carabid fauna of SEA is heterogeneous in composition and differs significantly from that of the Western and Central Altai. The boreal mountain component mostly comprises tundra species with circum-boreal or circum-arctic ranges, while the subarid component (typical Mongolian together with Ancient Mediterranean species) forms more than one-half of the species diversity in the mountain basins. The species diver- sity increases from the nival mountain belt (15 species, predominantly Altai-Sayan endemics) to moss-lichen tun- dras (40, mostly boreal, species).
    [Show full text]
  • The Ground Beetle Fauna (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of Southeastern Altai R
    ISSN 0013-8738, Entomological Review, 2010, Vol. 90, No. 8, pp. 968–988. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2010. Original Russian Text © R.Yu. Dudko, A.V. Matalin, D.N. Fedorenko, 2010, published in Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 2010, Vol. 89, No. 11, pp. 1312–1330. The Ground Beetle Fauna (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of Southeastern Altai R. Yu. Dudkoa, A. V. Matalinb, and D. N. Fedorenkoc aInstitute of Animal Systematics and Ecology, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 630091 Russia bMoscow Pedagogical State University, Moscow, 129243 Russia e-mail: [email protected] cInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119071 Russia Received October 1, 2009 Abstract—Long-term studies of the ground beetle fauna of Southeastern Altai (SEA) revealed 33 genera and 185 species; 3 and 15 species are reported for the first time from Russia and SEA, respectively. The following gen- era are the most diverse: Bembidion (47 species), Amara and Harpalus (21 each), Pterostichus (14), and Nebria (13). The subarid (35%) and boreal (32%) species prevail in the arealogical spectrum, while the mountain endem- ics comprise 13% of the fauna. The carabid fauna of SEA is heterogeneous in composition and differs significantly from that of the Western and Central Altai. The boreal mountain component mostly comprises tundra species with circum-boreal or circum-arctic ranges, while the subarid component (typical Mongolian together with Ancient Mediterranean species) forms more than one-half of the species diversity in the mountain basins. The species diver- sity increases from the nival mountain belt (15 species, predominantly Altai-Sayan endemics) to moss-lichen tun- dras (40, mostly boreal, species).
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenge of Compliance with SPS and Other Standards Associated with The
    47848 Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank The Challenge of Compliance with SPS and Other Standards Associated with the Public Disclosure Authorized Export of Shrimp and Selected Fresh Produce Items to the United States Market John E. Lamb Public Disclosure Authorized Julian A. Velez Robert W. Barclay Public Disclosure Authorized First printing or web posting: 2005 © 2004 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone 202-473-1000 Internet www.worldbank.org E-mail [email protected] All rights reserved. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Papers is an informal series produced by the Agriculture and Rural Development Department of the World Bank. These papers raise concepts and issues for discussion in the broader development community and describe ongoing research and/or implementation experiences from the Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank, the governments they represent, or the organizations of contributing authors. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Dr. Ir. Patrick De Clercq Department of Crop Protection, Laboratory of Agrozoology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University
    Promoters: Prof. dr. ir. Patrick De Clercq Department of Crop Protection, Laboratory of Agrozoology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University Prof. dr. ir. Luc Tirry Department of Crop Protection, Laboratory of Agrozoology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University Dr. Bruno Gobin, PCS- Ornamental Plant Research Dean: Prof. dr. ir. Marc Van Meirvenne Rector: Prof. dr. Anne De Paepe Effects of temperature regime and food supplementation on the performance of phytoseiid mites as biological control agents by Ir. Dominiek Vangansbeke Thesis submitted in the fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor (PhD) in Applied Biological Sciences Dutch translation: Effecten van temperatuurregime en voedingssupplementen op de prestaties van Phytoseiidae roofmijten als biologische bestrijders Please refer to this work as follows: Vangansbeke, D. (2015) Effects of temperature regime and food supplementation on the performance of phytoseiid mites as biological control agents. Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Front and backcover photographs: Dominiek Vangansbeke ISBN-number: 978-90-5989-847-9 This study was funded by grant number 090931 from the Institute for Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT). The research was conducted at the Laboratory of Agrozoology, Department of Crop Protection, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium and partly at PCS-Ornamental Plant Research, Schaessestraat 18, 9070 Destelbergen, Belgium The author and promoters give permission to use this study for consultation and to copy parts of it for personal use only. Every other use is subject to the copyright laws. Permission to reproduce any material should be obtained from the author. Table of content List of abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................i Scope and thesis outline .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Agromyzidae of Canada and Alaska
    THE AGROMYZIDAE OF CANADA AND AI,A.SKA Kexxern A. SPr,xcEn* Entomology Research Institute, canada Department of Agriculture, ottawa INTRODUCTION This paper is an initial handbook for identification of the Canadian Agromyzid^ae, with keys to genela and species. Illustrations of the male genitalia gin6n for all species in #nich males are known, except for a few cases where earlier"r"e figures are available. No "comprehensive paper on the Canadian Agromyzidae has previously. been published, altilough d.sciiptiotts of isolated spccieihave been.pre-gi1.d .by 4lll* \tOzv1, ioquilleit (lg02i, Curran (193la,^D), Frost (192+r, Melander (1913)' and ina serids of papers by Malloch between 1913 and 1918. Records of Canadian Agromyzidae ha'ieb..n .onu.nienrly summarised by Frick (1959) in"his synopsis oiXotth American species, and among those he lists as occurring_in Canada I have been able to .onfit- 41 as correJt. Frick in all deals with 206 described North American species, but these also include 16 of Neotropical distribution from the West Indies and Central America. Here. 290 species are recorded for Canada and Alaska. A breakdown of these by genera is shown in Table I: 147 species are described as new' 2J are new to Norih"America,T2 are shown to be Hoiarctic, and 13 are discussed as probable or possible introductions from Europe. In addition seven new synonymies have been established between American ind European species; two American sPecies previously synonymised ale now .esotr.ct.d^ as diitinct; four European names have in th.'past been incorrectly used for species now. described as new; one species hitheito considered as reitricted to North America and the Neotropical I{egion is recorded for the first time in the Palaearctic-Region, in Mongolia;.and fini'lly, one Nearctic name has been incorrectly applied to a Palaearctic species.
    [Show full text]
  • La Ponte Chez Le Balanin De La Châtaigne, Curculio Elephas (Gyll.) (Coléoptère : Curculionidae)
    1 N° d'ordre : 338-97 Année 1997 THÈSE présentée devant l'Université CLAUDE BERNARD - LYON I - pour l'obtention du DIPLÔME DE DOCTORAT Spécialité : Biométrie - Biologie des Populations par Emmanuel DESOUHANT Stratégies de ponte et traits d'histoire de vie chez les insectes. Exemple du balanin de la châtaigne, Curculio elephas (Coléoptère, Curculionidae), en conditions naturelles. Soutenue le 15 décembre 1997 Directeurs de thèse : D. Debouzie et F. Menu Jury : MM. Y. CARTON, rapporteur P. TREHEN, rapporteur C. BERNSTEIN C. COMBES D. DEBOUZIE F. MENU UMR CNRS 5558 "Biométrie, Génétique et Biologie des Populations" Université Claude Bernard - Lyon 1 43, bd du 11 Novembre 1918 69 622 Villeurbanne Cedex Références Bibliographiques 2 Abstract Oviposition strategies and life histoty traits in insects - Example of the chestnut weevil, Curculio elephas (Coleoptera : Curculionidae), in natural populations This work concerns study of the evolution of life history traits in insects. The purpose of this study is to estimate the principle demographic parameters in the chestnut weevil, Curculio elephas, to predict the best oviposition strategy in terms of evolutionary trade-offs. Facing a site for oviposition, a female insect must take three decisions which summarize oviposition strategy : 1) where to lay her eggs; 2) when to lay, and 3) how many eggs to lay in each site (Charnov & Skinner, 1985). Oviposition strategies determine the quality (fitness) of offspring and growth rate in the population. We have shown, from an oviposition behaviour study that a Curculio elephas female does not seem time-limited for egg-laying. In natural conditions, a female lays one or two eggs per chestut in 77% of infested fruits; she selects her oviposition sites, avoids those containing larvae of the chestnut moth, Cydia splendana, but not those already infested by weevil immatures.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Enemies of True Fruit Flies 02/2004-01 PPQ Jeffrey N
    United States Department of Agriculture Natural Enemies of Marketing and Regulatory True Fruit Flies Programs Animal and Plant Health (Tephritidae) Inspection Service Plant Protection Jeffrey N. L. Stibick and Quarantine Psyttalia fletcheri (shown) is the only fruit fly parasitoid introduced into Hawaii capable of parasitizing the melon fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae) United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine 4700 River Road Riverdale, MD 20737 February, 2004 Telephone: (301) 734-4406 FAX: (301) 734-8192 e-mail: [email protected] Jeffrey N. L. Stibick Introduction Introduction Fruit flies in the family Tephritidae are high profile insects among commercial fruit and vegetable growers, marketing exporters, government regulatory agencies, and the scientific community. Locally, producers face huge losses without some management scheme to control fruit fly populations. At the national and international level, plant protection agencies strictly regulate the movement of potentially infested products. Consumers throughout the world demand high quality, blemish-free produce. Partly to satisfy these demands, the costs to local, state and national governments are quite high and increasing as world trade, and thus risk, increases. Thus, fruit flies impose a considerable resource tax on participants at every level, from producer to shipper to the importing state and, ultimately, to the consumer. (McPheron & Steck, 1996) Indeed, in the United States alone, the running costs per year to APHIS, Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ), (the federal Agency responsible) for maintenance of trapping systems, laboratories, and identification are in excess of US$27 million per year and increasing. This figure only accounts for a fraction of total costs throughout the country, as State, County and local governments put in their share as well as the local industry affected.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Egg Size and Shape Evolve with Ecology but Not Developmental Rate Samuel H
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1302-4 Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology but not developmental rate Samuel H. Church1,4*, Seth Donoughe1,3,4, Bruno A. S. de Medeiros1 & Cassandra G. Extavour1,2* Over the course of evolution, organism size has diversified markedly. Changes in size are thought to have occurred because of developmental, morphological and/or ecological pressures. To perform phylogenetic tests of the potential effects of these pressures, here we generated a dataset of more than ten thousand descriptions of insect eggs, and combined these with genetic and life-history datasets. We show that, across eight orders of magnitude of variation in egg volume, the relationship between size and shape itself evolves, such that previously predicted global patterns of scaling do not adequately explain the diversity in egg shapes. We show that egg size is not correlated with developmental rate and that, for many insects, egg size is not correlated with adult body size. Instead, we find that the evolution of parasitoidism and aquatic oviposition help to explain the diversification in the size and shape of insect eggs. Our study suggests that where eggs are laid, rather than universal allometric constants, underlies the evolution of insect egg size and shape. Size is a fundamental factor in many biological processes. The size of an 526 families and every currently described extant hexapod order24 organism may affect interactions both with other organisms and with (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). We combined this dataset with the environment1,2, it scales with features of morphology and physi- backbone hexapod phylogenies25,26 that we enriched to include taxa ology3, and larger animals often have higher fitness4.
    [Show full text]