2004 Activity Report.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2004 Activity Report.Pdf TABLE OF CONTENTS 2004 Fire Statistics Regional Map ...................................................................................................................... i Regional Activity Summaries Pacific ..................................................................................................................... 1 Southwest ................................................................................................................ 4 Great Lakes-Big River ............................................................................................ 7 Southeast ................................................................................................................. 10 Northeast ................................................................................................................. 14 Mountain-Prairie ..................................................................................................... 17 Alaska ..................................................................................................................... 20 Wildfires Fire Activity Map ..................................................................................................... 24 Number / Acres ....................................................................................................... 25 By State ................................................................................................................... 26 By Refuge Pacific ......................................................................................................... 28 California/Nevada Operations .................................................................... 29 Southwest .................................................................................................... 30 Great Lakes-Big River ................................................................................ 31 Southeast ..................................................................................................... 32 Northeast ..................................................................................................... 34 Mountain-Prairie ......................................................................................... 35 Alaska ......................................................................................................... 36 By Cause ................................................................................................................. 37 By Size Class .......................................................................................................... 37 10-Day Period ......................................................................................................... 38 Treatments (Non-WUI) Activity Map ........................................................................................................... 39 Number / Acres ....................................................................................................... 40 By State ................................................................................................................... 41 By Refuge Pacific ......................................................................................................... 43 CNO ............................................................................................................ 44 Southwest .................................................................................................... 45 Great Lakes-Big River ................................................................................ 47 Southeast ..................................................................................................... 49 Northeast ..................................................................................................... 50 Mountain-Prairie ......................................................................................... 51 Alaska ......................................................................................................... 53 Wildland-Urban Interface Treatments Activity Map ........................................................................................................... 54 Number / Acres ....................................................................................................... 55 By State ................................................................................................................... 56 By Refuge Pacific ......................................................................................................... 58 California/Nevada Operations .................................................................... 59 Southwest .................................................................................................... 60 Great Lakes-Big Rivers............................................................................... 61 Southeast...................................................................................................... 62 Northeast...................................................................................................... 64 Mountain-Prairie.......................................................................................... 65 Alaska.......................................................................................................... 66 2000 - 2004 Statistics Pacific.......................................................................................................... 67 California/Nevada Operation....................................................................... 70 Southwest..................................................................................................... 73 Great Lakes-Big Rivers............................................................................... 76 Southeast...................................................................................................... 79 Northeast...................................................................................................... 82 Mountain-Prairie.......................................................................................... 85 Alaska.......................................................................................................... 88 Regions 1-7.......................................................................................................................... 91 False Alarms........................................................................................................................ 94 Support Actions................................................................................................................... 94 1995 - 2004 Statistics Wildfires.............................................................................................................................. 95 Treatments............................................................................................................................ 96 Department of the Interior 2000 - 2004 Wildfires.............................................................................................................................. 97 Treatments............................................................................................................................ 98 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE Regional Map Akaska REGION 7 Pacific REGION 1 Mountain - Prairie Northeast REGION 6 REGION 5 Great Lakes-Big Rivers California and Nevada REGION 3 REGION 8 Southeast Southwest REGION 4 REGION 2 i PACIFIC REGION The 2003 fire season lasted into the 2004 protected lands. The SEAT worked fiscal year as the San Diego Fire Storm piggy-back with a USFS-funded SEAT consumed portions of the San Diego and on many other Federal fires. During the Hopper Mountain National Wildlife 2004 fire season, the SEAT, which has a Refuges, with Hopper Mountain burning 500-gallon capacity, dropped an over twice in the same year. However, estimated 10,000 gallons of fire retardant despite continuing drought and during fire suppression operations. predictions of another severe season, the 2004 fire season turned out to be average The Region hired two employees to help in California and the Great Basin. The staff an interagency engine and fill out State of Washington, however, several interagency 20-person hand experienced an extremely busy fire crews based on Federal lands in season; 36 Type I and Type II Incident Washington and Oregon. Our Management Teams were briefed, employees responded to over 20 fire transitioned, and utilized during the calls on Federal and State protected season. lands. Due to the large fires in central For the second year in a row, the Region Washington, the Leavenworth National provided rotating crew members to staff Fish Hatchery had to be evacuated twice, and train with an interagency Helitack and the ES office outside of Wenatchee, crew based in Las Vegas, Nevada. Washington, was evacuated once. The Leavenworth Fish Hatchery was used as This has been a year of transition for the an ICP for several Type I Incident Region. The Regional Office and the Management Teams. California/Nevada Operations Office (CNO) are in the midst of a re- Severity requests were received and organization. Functions such as fire processed beginning in June, and some management planning, fire ecology, stations remained in severity for the prescribed fire oversight, and fire duration of the fire season. technical support will probably still serve the entire Region, but the details The Region experienced three large fires have not been worked out yet. on
Recommended publications
  • California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007
    CALIFORNIA FIRE SIEGE 2007 AN OVERVIEW Cover photos from top clockwise: The Santiago Fire threatens a development on October 23, 2007. (Photo credit: Scott Vickers, istockphoto) Image of Harris Fire taken from Ikhana unmanned aircraft on October 24, 2007. (Photo credit: NASA/U.S. Forest Service) A firefighter tries in vain to cool the flames of a wind-whipped blaze. (Photo credit: Dan Elliot) The American Red Cross acted quickly to establish evacuation centers during the siege. (Photo credit: American Red Cross) Opposite Page: Painting of Harris Fire by Kate Dore, based on photo by Wes Schultz. 2 Introductory Statement In October of 2007, a series of large wildfires ignited and burned hundreds of thousands of acres in Southern California. The fires displaced nearly one million residents, destroyed thousands of homes, and sadly took the lives of 10 people. Shortly after the fire siege began, a team was commissioned by CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service and OES to gather data and measure the response from the numerous fire agencies involved. This report is the result of the team’s efforts and is based upon the best available information and all known facts that have been accumulated. In addition to outlining the fire conditions leading up to the 2007 siege, this report presents statistics —including availability of firefighting resources, acreage engaged, and weather conditions—alongside the strategies that were employed by fire commanders to create a complete day-by-day account of the firefighting effort. The ability to protect the lives, property, and natural resources of the residents of California is contingent upon the strength of cooperation and coordination among federal, state and local firefighting agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Evergreen Fire Protection District Jefferson and Clear Creek Counties, Colorado
    2020 Evergreen Fire Protection District Jefferson and Clear Creek Counties, Colorado F Community Wildfire Protection Plan EVERGREEN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN 2020 UPDATE Prepared for Evergreen Fire/Rescue 1802 Bergen Pkwy, Evergreen, Colorado 80439 Prepared by Forest Stewards Guild 170 2nd Street SW Loveland, CO 80537 1 CONTENTS Evergreen Fire Protection District ............................................................................................................................1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................5 Evergreen’s Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) .......................................................................................................6 Fire History ..................................................................................................................................................................8 Catastrophic Wildfire – Common Factors .........................................................................................................9 Ignition Prevention ................................................................................................................................................. 10 Evergreen’s Preparedness for Wildfire ................................................................................................................. 11 Community Accomplishments since first CWPP .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Vulnerability Assessment for Mendocino County ______
    FIRE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR MENDOCINO COUNTY ____________________________________________ _________________________________________ August 2020 Mendocino County Fire Vulnerability Assessment ________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION I- OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 6 A. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 6 B. Project Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 6 C. Mendocino County Description and Demographics ................................................................ 7 D. Planning Area Basis .................................................................................................................. 8 SECTION II- COUNTY WILDFIRE ASSESSMENT ............................................................ 9 A. Wildfire Threat ......................................................................................................................... 9 B. Weather/Climate ........................................................................................................................ 9 C. Topography ............................................................................................................................. 10 D. Fuel Hazards ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019
    REVIEW OF CALIFORNIA WILDFIRE EVACUATIONS FROM 2017 TO 2019 STEPHEN WONG, JACQUELYN BROADER, AND SUSAN SHAHEEN, PH.D. MARCH 2020 DOI: 10.7922/G2WW7FVK DOI: 10.7922/G29G5K2R Wong, Broader, Shaheen 2 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. UC-ITS-2019-19-b N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019 March 2020 6. Performing Organization Code ITS-Berkeley 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report Stephen D. Wong (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3638-3651), No. Jacquelyn C. Broader (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3269-955X), N/A Susan A. Shaheen, Ph.D. (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3350-856X) 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Institute of Transportation Studies, Berkeley N/A 109 McLaughlin Hall, MC1720 11. Contract or Grant No. Berkeley, CA 94720-1720 UC-ITS-2019-19 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period The University of California Institute of Transportation Studies Covered www.ucits.org Final Report 14. Sponsoring Agency Code UC ITS 15. Supplementary Notes DOI: 10.7922/G29G5K2R 16. Abstract Between 2017 and 2019, California experienced a series of devastating wildfires that together led over one million people to be ordered to evacuate. Due to the speed of many of these wildfires, residents across California found themselves in challenging evacuation situations, often at night and with little time to escape. These evacuations placed considerable stress on public resources and infrastructure for both transportation and sheltering.
    [Show full text]
  • CEE 189 Remote Sensing Jiaheng Hu CEE Department, Tufts University
    Forestation Change Detection in Los Angeles Wildfires Background Processes Wildfire is one of the most disastrous event around the world, as it Sand Fire Creek Fire burn large area of forest and often times it will also burn buildings and threaten human’s life. Wildfire is usually triggered by dry cli- mate, volcano ash, hot wind and so on, but can be caused by human as well: a used cigarette thrown by a visitor who is unaware of envi- ronmental protection, or illegally put on a fire by someone. Wildfire has become frequent in California these years. There were 64 wildfires in record in 2017, the figure on the right shows the area destroyed by wildfire. Many wildfires occur in national forest parks Landsat 8 Metadata for Sand Fire on August 9, 2016 Landsat 8 Metadata for Sand Fire on February 4, 2018 (Source: USGS Earth Explorer) (Source: USGS Earth Explorer) just adjacent to some big cities such as LA and San Francisco. 1. Resize 2. Create Water Mask Remote sensing has been developed for several decades and proved to be a useful tool for large-scale environmental moni- 6. Color Slicing toring, conservation goals, spatial analysis and natural re- 3. Radiometric Cali- sources manage- 4. Apply BAI bration ment. Float(b2)-float(b1) B1= BAI of Sand fire Two Sand fire (Jul 22, 2016-Aug 3, 2016) and Creek fire (Dec 5, 2017- B2= BAI of Creek fire Jan 9, 2018) happened in Angeles National Forest. It is worthwhile to evaluate the change after these two fires by using some index.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Urban Interface Community Wildfire Protection Plan Prepared For: Elk Creek Fire Protection District Conifer, Colorado
    Wildland Urban Interface Community Wildfire Protection Plan Prepared for: Elk Creek Fire Protection District Conifer, Colorado Submitted By: Anchor Point Boulder, Colorado September 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOPSE....................................................................................................................................................... 1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................... 1 OTHER DESIRED OUTCOMES ......................................................................................................................... 1 UNDERSTANDING THIS DOCUMENT ....................................................................................................... 3 THE NATIONAL FIRE PLAN ............................................................................................................................ 3 STUDY AREA PROFILE ................................................................................................................................ 5 VALUES......................................................................................................................................................... 10 PRIORITIZED VALUES TO BE PROTECTED ................................................................................................... 10 CURRENT RISK SITUATION...................................................................................................................... 13 FIRE REGIME AND
    [Show full text]
  • Cal Fire: Creek Fire Now the Largest Single Wildfire in California History
    Cal Fire: Creek Fire now the largest single wildfire in California history By Joe Jacquez Visalia Times-Delta, Wednesday, September 23, 2020 The Creek Fire is now the largest single, non-complex wildfire in California history, according to an update from Cal Fire. The fire has burned 286,519 acres as of Monday night and is 32 percent contained, according to Cal Fire. The Creek Fire, which began Sept. 4, is located in Big Creek, Huntington Lake, Shaver Lake, Mammoth Pool and San Joaquin River Canyon. Creek Fire damage realized There were approximately 82 Madera County structures destroyed in the blaze. Six of those structures were homes, according to Commander Bill Ward. There are still more damage assessments to be made as evacuation orders are lifted and converted to warnings. Madera County sheriff's deputies notified the residents whose homes were lost in the fire. The Fresno County side of the fire sustained significantly more damage, according to Truax. "We are working with (Fresno County) to come up with away to get that information out," Incident Commander Nick Truax said. California wildfires:Firefighters battle more than 25 major blazes, Bobcat Fire grows Of the 4,900 structures under assessment, 30% have been validated using Fresno and Madera counties assessor records. Related: 'It's just too dangerous': Firefighters make slow progress assessing Creek Fire damage So far, damage inspection teams have counted more than 300 destroyed structures and 32 damaged structures. "These are the areas we can safely get to," Truax said. "There are a lot of areas that trees have fallen across the roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Board of Directors, Aromas Tri-County Fire Protection District, County of Monterey, State of California
    AROMAS TRI-COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING NOTICE & AGENDA Tuesday May 30, 2017 - 6:30 p.m. 492 Carpenteria Road, Aromas, California 95004 ROLL CALL: Miller __ Mahler __ Mortan Mesiroff______ Brown____ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Director Mesiroff PUBLIC COMMENT 6:30 P.M. - Opportunity to address the Board on items of interest not appearing on the agenda. No action may be taken unless provided by Government Code 54954.2 (speakers are limited to 5 minutes). The public may comment on any matter listed on the agenda at the time the matter is being considered by the Board. DIRECTORS COMMENT PERIOD APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1 Approve minutes of the March 23, 2017 regular meeting. ACTION PUBLIC HEARING 6:35 P.M. Preliminary Budget for fiscal year 2017-18 2 Receive proposed final budget of $1,656,600 for fiscal year 2017-18 2a. Receive public comment on the proposed final budget. 2b. Consider and approve Resolution No. 2017-05 adopting a preliminary budget of $1,656,600 for fiscal year 2017-18. ACTION GENERAL BUSINESS 3 Receive report of operations, training and fire prevention. 4 Receive staff report on Financial Audit Services. 5 Receive and consider staff report and CSG Consultants contract. ACTION FINANCIAL 6 Approve checks for April and May 2017. 7 Receive budget status report. Any documents produced by Aromas Tri-County Fire Protection District and distributed to a majority of the board 1 regarding any item on the agenda will be made available at the Aromas fire station located at 492 Carpenteria, Aromas, CA during normal business hours.
    [Show full text]
  • The Costs and Losses of Wildfires a Literature Review
    NIST Special Publication 1215 The Costs and Losses of Wildfires A Literature Review Douglas Thomas David Butry Stanley Gilbert David Webb Juan Fung This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1215 NIST Special Publication 1215 The Costs and Losses of Wildfires A Literature Survey Douglas Thomas David Butry Stanley Gilbert David Webb Juan Fung Applied Economics Office Engineering Laboratory This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1215 November 2017 U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Walter Copan, NIST Director and Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. Photo Credit: Lake City, Fla., May 15, 2007 -- The Florida Bugaboo Fire still rages out of control in some locations. FEMA Photo by Mark Wolfe - May 14, 2007 - Location: Lake City, FL: https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/images/51316 National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 1215 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 1215, 72 pages (October 2017) CODEN: NSPUE2 This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1215 Abstract This report enumerates all possible costs of wildfire management and wildfire-related losses.
    [Show full text]
  • FIRE DEPARTMENT TOWN 106 Rural Fire District Association Newkirk Adair County Tri Community Volunteer Fire Dept
    FIRE DEPARTMENT TOWN 106 Rural Fire District Association Newkirk Adair County Tri Community Volunteer Fire Dept. Stilwell Airport Road Fire Support Incorporated Bartlesville Albany Volunteer Fire Department Albany Albion Fire Department Association Albion Alden Fire Department Association Carnegie Alfalfa Rural Fire Company Carnegie Arlington Volunteer Fire Dept. Incorporated Prague Arrowhead Estates Voluntary Fire Department, Inc. Canadian Ash Creek Community Fire Department Inc. Wilburton Ashland Volunteer Fire Dept Association Stuart Baker Fire Protection Association Turpin Bar C Rural Fire Department, Inc Burbank Barnsdall Rural Fire Association Incorporated Barnsdall Basin Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. Mannford Bear Creek Rural Fire District Association Kaw City Bee Community Volunteer Fire Department Association Kenefic Bell Rural Fire Department Inc Stilwell Bengal Fire Department Assn Wister Bennington Community Rural Volunteer Fire Department Assoc. Bennington Bennington Bentley Volunteer Fire District Atoka Berlin Volunteer Fire Association Sayre Berryhill Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. Tulsa Bethel Road Fire Department Association Lawton Big 4 Rural Fire District Association Kingfisher Big Beaver Fire Department Inc. Shidler Big Bend Volunteer Fire Department Inc. Ralston Big Cedar Volunteer Fire Dept., Inc. Muse Black Dog Fire Association Tulsa Blackburn Rural Fire Department Pawnee Blackgum Mountain Fire Department Vian Blackland Fire Corporation Pawhuska Blue Volunteer Fire Association McAlester Bluff Fire Department Inc Soper Boggy Fire Department Association Red Oak Boulanger Rural Fire Dept. Inc. Pawhuska Bowlin Springs Fire Protection Association Chelsea Brent Rural Fire District Inc. Sallisaw Bridge Creek Fire Fighters Association Blanchard Brooken Volunteer Fire Department Stigler Brooksville Volunteer Fire Dept Corporation Tecumseh Broxton Fire Dept. Company Assn. Fort Cobb Brushy Mt. Vol. Fire Dept. Muskogee Brushy Mt.-Sequoyah Co.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC SAFETY U Building a Safer Los Angeles 99
    MOTION PUBLIC SAFETY U Building a Safer Los Angeles 99 From time to time it is appropriate for the Council to review and update ordinances adopted in the past. The urgency to do this is compounded when those ordinances relate to public safety, and even more so when a natural disaster affects our City such as the recent wildfires. In recent years, the City has made strides in enhancing the protection and character of our hillside communities, specifically our hillside single family home communities. Both in 2011 and again 2017 the City adopted stricter Baseline Hillside Ordinances to better ensure public safety in those neighborhoods. Though these ordinances addressed out of scale development and neighborhood character, the secondary effects ensure safer communities and better design that reduces risk during catastrophic events such as wildfires. The City must ensure that our growing multifamily housing stock is being constructed safely with skilled labor, and is resilient in the face of growing threats from wildfires and other natural disasters. In late 2018 the risk and devastation from wildfires was on full display throughout California. The risk associated with wildfires has grown exponentially in recent years. The frequency and intensity of these fires has made them a serious public safety risk. Their speed and intensity have created an urgent need to address their impacts. Much of this increased risk comes from the growing impacts of climate change that has changed the ecological makeup of our forests and climatic shifts that have driven the region into drought year after year, as well as rapid growth of our urban-wildland interface.
    [Show full text]
  • Before Wildfire Strikes!
    EM 9131 n DECEMBER 2015 Before Wildfire Strikes! A Handbook for Homeowners and Communities in Southwest Oregon Do you know what it takes to survive wildfire? Southwest Oregon at Risk In the fire-adapted ecosystems of southwest Oregon, it is not a matter of “if” wildfire is going to occur, but “when.” Unfortunately, many residents living in Josephine and Jackson counties and beyond are not prepared for wildfire. Neither are their homes. Faced with the growing potential for loss of human life and property due to wildfire, southwest Oregon’s firefighting agencies and Oregon State University’s Cooperative Extension have come together to promote an integrated approach, melding Firewise Community concepts of on-the-ground fuels management with the larger community interaction and landscape-wide fire resilience in a Fire-Adapted Community concept. They believe this is the best opportunity to decrease the wildfire threat. When a wildfire is threatening your community, the time to prepare has passed. However, there are steps that homeowners can take to improve personal safety and home survival before a wildfire occurs. The purpose of this publication is to promote and teach these steps. Once implemented at the neighborhood level, these recommendations will assist Map: U.S. Forest Service communities in becoming fire-adapted. Fire starts in Josephine and Jackson counties for 2015. Who wins, who loses Why do some houses survive a wildfire, while others are destroyed? Research shows that house survival during wildfire is not random, miraculous, or dumb luck. Rather, it is the features of the house, the characteristics of the adjacent vegetation and other fuels, and routine maintenance that often determine which houses burn and which survive.
    [Show full text]