Abnormal Expression of EPB41L1 in Colon Adenocarcinoma and Effect
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
1 Evidence for Gliadin Antibodies As Causative Agents in Schizophrenia
1 Evidence for gliadin antibodies as causative agents in schizophrenia. C.J.Carter PolygenicPathways, 20 Upper Maze Hill, Saint-Leonard’s on Sea, East Sussex, TN37 0LG [email protected] Tel: 0044 (0)1424 422201 I have no fax Abstract Antibodies to gliadin, a component of gluten, have frequently been reported in schizophrenia patients, and in some cases remission has been noted following the instigation of a gluten free diet. Gliadin is a highly immunogenic protein, and B cell epitopes along its entire immunogenic length are homologous to the products of numerous proteins relevant to schizophrenia (p = 0.012 to 3e-25). These include members of the DISC1 interactome, of glutamate, dopamine and neuregulin signalling networks, and of pathways involved in plasticity, dendritic growth or myelination. Antibodies to gliadin are likely to cross react with these key proteins, as has already been observed with synapsin 1 and calreticulin. Gliadin may thus be a causative agent in schizophrenia, under certain genetic and immunological conditions, producing its effects via antibody mediated knockdown of multiple proteins relevant to the disease process. Because of such homology, an autoimmune response may be sustained by the human antigens that resemble gliadin itself, a scenario supported by many reports of immune activation both in the brain and in lymphocytes in schizophrenia. Gluten free diets and removal of such antibodies may be of therapeutic benefit in certain cases of schizophrenia. 2 Introduction A number of studies from China, Norway, and the USA have reported the presence of gliadin antibodies in schizophrenia 1-5. Gliadin is a component of gluten, intolerance to which is implicated in coeliac disease 6. -
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary materials Supplementary Table S1: MGNC compound library Ingredien Molecule Caco- Mol ID MW AlogP OB (%) BBB DL FASA- HL t Name Name 2 shengdi MOL012254 campesterol 400.8 7.63 37.58 1.34 0.98 0.7 0.21 20.2 shengdi MOL000519 coniferin 314.4 3.16 31.11 0.42 -0.2 0.3 0.27 74.6 beta- shengdi MOL000359 414.8 8.08 36.91 1.32 0.99 0.8 0.23 20.2 sitosterol pachymic shengdi MOL000289 528.9 6.54 33.63 0.1 -0.6 0.8 0 9.27 acid Poricoic acid shengdi MOL000291 484.7 5.64 30.52 -0.08 -0.9 0.8 0 8.67 B Chrysanthem shengdi MOL004492 585 8.24 38.72 0.51 -1 0.6 0.3 17.5 axanthin 20- shengdi MOL011455 Hexadecano 418.6 1.91 32.7 -0.24 -0.4 0.7 0.29 104 ylingenol huanglian MOL001454 berberine 336.4 3.45 36.86 1.24 0.57 0.8 0.19 6.57 huanglian MOL013352 Obacunone 454.6 2.68 43.29 0.01 -0.4 0.8 0.31 -13 huanglian MOL002894 berberrubine 322.4 3.2 35.74 1.07 0.17 0.7 0.24 6.46 huanglian MOL002897 epiberberine 336.4 3.45 43.09 1.17 0.4 0.8 0.19 6.1 huanglian MOL002903 (R)-Canadine 339.4 3.4 55.37 1.04 0.57 0.8 0.2 6.41 huanglian MOL002904 Berlambine 351.4 2.49 36.68 0.97 0.17 0.8 0.28 7.33 Corchorosid huanglian MOL002907 404.6 1.34 105 -0.91 -1.3 0.8 0.29 6.68 e A_qt Magnogrand huanglian MOL000622 266.4 1.18 63.71 0.02 -0.2 0.2 0.3 3.17 iolide huanglian MOL000762 Palmidin A 510.5 4.52 35.36 -0.38 -1.5 0.7 0.39 33.2 huanglian MOL000785 palmatine 352.4 3.65 64.6 1.33 0.37 0.7 0.13 2.25 huanglian MOL000098 quercetin 302.3 1.5 46.43 0.05 -0.8 0.3 0.38 14.4 huanglian MOL001458 coptisine 320.3 3.25 30.67 1.21 0.32 0.9 0.26 9.33 huanglian MOL002668 Worenine -
Gene Expression in the Mouse Eye: an Online Resource for Genetics Using 103 Strains of Mice
Molecular Vision 2009; 15:1730-1763 <http://www.molvis.org/molvis/v15/a185> © 2009 Molecular Vision Received 3 September 2008 | Accepted 25 August 2009 | Published 31 August 2009 Gene expression in the mouse eye: an online resource for genetics using 103 strains of mice Eldon E. Geisert,1 Lu Lu,2 Natalie E. Freeman-Anderson,1 Justin P. Templeton,1 Mohamed Nassr,1 Xusheng Wang,2 Weikuan Gu,3 Yan Jiao,3 Robert W. Williams2 (First two authors contributed equally to this work) 1Department of Ophthalmology and Center for Vision Research, Memphis, TN; 2Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology and Center for Integrative and Translational Genomics, Memphis, TN; 3Department of Orthopedics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN Purpose: Individual differences in patterns of gene expression account for much of the diversity of ocular phenotypes and variation in disease risk. We examined the causes of expression differences, and in their linkage to sequence variants, functional differences, and ocular pathophysiology. Methods: mRNAs from young adult eyes were hybridized to oligomer microarrays (Affymetrix M430v2). Data were embedded in GeneNetwork with millions of single nucleotide polymorphisms, custom array annotation, and information on complementary cellular, functional, and behavioral traits. The data include male and female samples from 28 common strains, 68 BXD recombinant inbred lines, as well as several mutants and knockouts. Results: We provide a fully integrated resource to map, graph, analyze, and test causes and correlations of differences in gene expression in the eye. Covariance in mRNA expression can be used to infer gene function, extract signatures for different cells or tissues, to define molecular networks, and to map quantitative trait loci that produce expression differences. -
The DNA Sequence and Comparative Analysis of Human Chromosome 20
articles The DNA sequence and comparative analysis of human chromosome 20 P. Deloukas, L. H. Matthews, J. Ashurst, J. Burton, J. G. R. Gilbert, M. Jones, G. Stavrides, J. P. Almeida, A. K. Babbage, C. L. Bagguley, J. Bailey, K. F. Barlow, K. N. Bates, L. M. Beard, D. M. Beare, O. P. Beasley, C. P. Bird, S. E. Blakey, A. M. Bridgeman, A. J. Brown, D. Buck, W. Burrill, A. P. Butler, C. Carder, N. P. Carter, J. C. Chapman, M. Clamp, G. Clark, L. N. Clark, S. Y. Clark, C. M. Clee, S. Clegg, V. E. Cobley, R. E. Collier, R. Connor, N. R. Corby, A. Coulson, G. J. Coville, R. Deadman, P. Dhami, M. Dunn, A. G. Ellington, J. A. Frankland, A. Fraser, L. French, P. Garner, D. V. Grafham, C. Grif®ths, M. N. D. Grif®ths, R. Gwilliam, R. E. Hall, S. Hammond, J. L. Harley, P. D. Heath, S. Ho, J. L. Holden, P. J. Howden, E. Huckle, A. R. Hunt, S. E. Hunt, K. Jekosch, C. M. Johnson, D. Johnson, M. P. Kay, A. M. Kimberley, A. King, A. Knights, G. K. Laird, S. Lawlor, M. H. Lehvaslaiho, M. Leversha, C. Lloyd, D. M. Lloyd, J. D. Lovell, V. L. Marsh, S. L. Martin, L. J. McConnachie, K. McLay, A. A. McMurray, S. Milne, D. Mistry, M. J. F. Moore, J. C. Mullikin, T. Nickerson, K. Oliver, A. Parker, R. Patel, T. A. V. Pearce, A. I. Peck, B. J. C. T. Phillimore, S. R. Prathalingam, R. W. Plumb, H. Ramsay, C. M. -
Osu1291037634.Pdf (3.74
Expression Genetics in the Human Brain: Evolution and Disease DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Ryan Matthew Smith Neuroscience Graduate Studies Program The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Wolfgang Sadee, Advisor Christine E. Beattie Jack A. Boulant John D. Oberdick Copyright by Ryan Matthew Smith 2010 Abstract Genetic diversity is a major factor driving phenotypic differences between individuals. The wide spectrum of heritable traits ranges from mild personality differences to extreme instances of Mendelian genetic disorders. Consequently, researchers have expended significant resources attempting to find genetic variants that contribute to phenotypic diversity, especially those relating to human disease. Past efforts have been most successful at uncovering highly penetrant mutations that occur in the protein coding regions of genes. Promoter and intronic variants can also have drastic effects on phenotype, with recent estimates suggesting that variants acting at the RNA level contribute to greater than 60% of all genetic disease. Most of these genetic variants affect RNA processing, especially transcript splicing. Here, I present a series of studies exploring relationships between genetic variants that significantly affect RNA expression and three neurological phenotypes. First, I uncovered a transcription enhancer region contributing to nicotinic α5 receptor subunit mRNA expression and subsequently -
High-Density Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Detects Novel Copy Number Alterations in Gastric Adenocarcinoma
ANTICANCER RESEARCH 34: 6405-6416 (2014) High-density Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Detects Novel Copy Number Alterations in Gastric Adenocarcinoma ALINE DAMASCENO SEABRA1,2*, TAÍSSA MAÍRA THOMAZ ARAÚJO1,2*, FERNANDO AUGUSTO RODRIGUES MELLO JUNIOR1,2, DIEGO DI FELIPE ÁVILA ALCÂNTARA1,2, AMANDA PAIVA DE BARROS1,2, PAULO PIMENTEL DE ASSUMPÇÃO2, RAQUEL CARVALHO MONTENEGRO1,2, ADRIANA COSTA GUIMARÃES1,2, SAMIA DEMACHKI2, ROMMEL MARIO RODRÍGUEZ BURBANO1,2 and ANDRÉ SALIM KHAYAT1,2 1Human Cytogenetics Laboratory and 2Oncology Research Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém Pará, Brazil Abstract. Aim: To investigate frequent quantitative alterations gastric cancer is the second most frequent cancer in men and of intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma. Materials and the third in women (4). The state of Pará has a high Methods: We analyzed genome-wide DNA copy numbers of 22 incidence of gastric adenocarcinoma and this disease is a samples and using CytoScan® HD Array. Results: We identified public health problem, since mortality rates are above the 22 gene alterations that to the best of our knowledge have not Brazilian average (5). been described for gastric cancer, including of v-erb-b2 avian This tumor can be classified into two histological types, erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 4 (ERBB4), intestinal and diffuse, according to Laurén (4, 6, 7). The SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 6 (SOX6), regulator of intestinal type predominates in high-risk areas, such as telomere elongation helicase 1 (RTEL1) and UDP- Brazil, and arises from precursor lesions, whereas the diffuse Gal:betaGlcNAc beta 1,4- galactosyltransferase, polypeptide 5 type has a similar distribution in high- and low-risk areas and (B4GALT5). -
Table S1. 103 Ferroptosis-Related Genes Retrieved from the Genecards
Table S1. 103 ferroptosis-related genes retrieved from the GeneCards. Gene Symbol Description Category GPX4 Glutathione Peroxidase 4 Protein Coding AIFM2 Apoptosis Inducing Factor Mitochondria Associated 2 Protein Coding TP53 Tumor Protein P53 Protein Coding ACSL4 Acyl-CoA Synthetase Long Chain Family Member 4 Protein Coding SLC7A11 Solute Carrier Family 7 Member 11 Protein Coding VDAC2 Voltage Dependent Anion Channel 2 Protein Coding VDAC3 Voltage Dependent Anion Channel 3 Protein Coding ATG5 Autophagy Related 5 Protein Coding ATG7 Autophagy Related 7 Protein Coding NCOA4 Nuclear Receptor Coactivator 4 Protein Coding HMOX1 Heme Oxygenase 1 Protein Coding SLC3A2 Solute Carrier Family 3 Member 2 Protein Coding ALOX15 Arachidonate 15-Lipoxygenase Protein Coding BECN1 Beclin 1 Protein Coding PRKAA1 Protein Kinase AMP-Activated Catalytic Subunit Alpha 1 Protein Coding SAT1 Spermidine/Spermine N1-Acetyltransferase 1 Protein Coding NF2 Neurofibromin 2 Protein Coding YAP1 Yes1 Associated Transcriptional Regulator Protein Coding FTH1 Ferritin Heavy Chain 1 Protein Coding TF Transferrin Protein Coding TFRC Transferrin Receptor Protein Coding FTL Ferritin Light Chain Protein Coding CYBB Cytochrome B-245 Beta Chain Protein Coding GSS Glutathione Synthetase Protein Coding CP Ceruloplasmin Protein Coding PRNP Prion Protein Protein Coding SLC11A2 Solute Carrier Family 11 Member 2 Protein Coding SLC40A1 Solute Carrier Family 40 Member 1 Protein Coding STEAP3 STEAP3 Metalloreductase Protein Coding ACSL1 Acyl-CoA Synthetase Long Chain Family Member 1 Protein -
Autocrine IFN Signaling Inducing Profibrotic Fibroblast Responses by a Synthetic TLR3 Ligand Mitigates
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021 Inducing is online at: average * The Journal of Immunology published online 16 August 2013 from submission to initial decision 4 weeks from acceptance to publication http://www.jimmunol.org/content/early/2013/08/16/jimmun ol.1300376 A Synthetic TLR3 Ligand Mitigates Profibrotic Fibroblast Responses by Autocrine IFN Signaling Feng Fang, Kohtaro Ooka, Xiaoyong Sun, Ruchi Shah, Swati Bhattacharyya, Jun Wei and John Varga J Immunol Submit online. Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists ? is published twice each month by http://jimmunol.org/subscription Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2013/08/20/jimmunol.130037 6.DC1 Information about subscribing to The JI No Triage! Fast Publication! Rapid Reviews! 30 days* Why • • • Material Permissions Email Alerts Subscription Supplementary The Journal of Immunology The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2013 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. This information is current as of September 28, 2021. Published August 16, 2013, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1300376 The Journal of Immunology A Synthetic TLR3 Ligand Mitigates Profibrotic Fibroblast Responses by Inducing Autocrine IFN Signaling Feng Fang,* Kohtaro Ooka,* Xiaoyong Sun,† Ruchi Shah,* Swati Bhattacharyya,* Jun Wei,* and John Varga* Activation of TLR3 by exogenous microbial ligands or endogenous injury-associated ligands leads to production of type I IFN. -
Isolation and Characterization of Multi-Protein Complexes Enriched in the K-Cl Co-Transporter 2 from Brain Plasma Membranes
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.30.071076; this version posted May 1, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Kcc2 proteome Isolation and characterization of multi-protein complexes enriched in the K-Cl co-transporter 2 from brain plasma membranes. Joshua L. Smalley1, Georgina Kontou1, Catherine Choi1, Qiu Ren1, David Albrecht1, Krithika Abiraman1, Miguel A. Rodriguez Santos1, Christopher E. Bope1, Tarek Z. Deeb1, Paul A. Davies1, Nicholas J. Brandon2 and Stephen J. Moss*1,3 1Department of Neuroscience, Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Ave, Boston 02111. 2Neuroscience, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Boston, MA 02451. 3Department of Neuroscience, Physiology, and Pharmacology, University College, London, WC1E, 6BT, UK. Running Title: Plasma membrane Kcc2 protein complexes and phosphorylation To whom correspondence should be addressed: Professor. S. J. Moss, Department of Neuroscience, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston MA 02111, Telephone: (617) 636-3976; FAX: (617) 636-2413; Email: [email protected] Key words; Kcc2, proteome, interactome, phosphorylation. ABSTRACT Kcc2 plays a critical role in ankyrins, and the IP3 receptor. We also identified determining the efficacy of synaptic inhibition, interactors more directly associated with however, the cellular mechanism neurons use to phosphorylation; Akap5 and Lmtk3. Finally, we regulate its membrane trafficking, stability and used LC-MS/MS on highly purified endogenous activity are ill-defined. To address these issues, plasma membrane Kcc2 to detect we used affinity purification to isolate stable phosphorylation sites. We detected 11 sites with multi-protein complexes of Kcc2 from the plasma high confidence, including known and novel membrane of murine forebrain. -
The Three-Dimensional Landscape of Chromatin Accessibility in Alzheimer's Disease
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.11.426303; this version posted January 12, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Title: The three-dimensional landscape of chromatin accessibility in Alzheimer's disease Authors: Jaroslav Bendl1,2,3,4,5§, Mads E. Hauberg2,4,7,8,9§, Kiran Girdhar1,2,3,4,5§, Eunju Im10,11, 5 James M. Vicari1,2,3,4,5, Samir Rahman1,2,3,4,5, Pengfei Dong1,2,3,4,5, Ruth Misir1,2,3,4,5, Steven P. Kleopoulos1,2,3,4,5, Sarah M. Reach1,2,3,4,5, Pasha Apontes1,2,3,4,5, Biao Zeng1,2,3,4,5, Wen Zhang1,2,3,4,5, Georgios Voloudakis1,2,4, Ralph A. Nixon10,11,12,13, Vahram Haroutunian2,4,6,14, Gabriel E. Hoffman1,3,5, John F. Fullard1,2,3,4,5*, Panos Roussos1,2,3,4,5,10,14*† Affiliations: 10 1Pamela Sklar Division of Psychiatric Genomics, 2Friedman Brain Institute, 3Icahn Institute for Data Science and Genomic Technology, 4Department of Psychiatry, 5Department of Genetics and Genomic Science, 6Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA 7Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark. 15 8The Lundbeck Foundation Initiative of Integrative Psychiatric Research (iPSYCH), Aarhus University, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark 9Centre for Integrative Sequencing (iSEQ), Aarhus University, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark 10Center for Dementia Research, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA 20 11Department of Psychiatry, 12Department of Cell Biology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA 13New York University Neuroscience Institute, New York, NY 10003, USA 14Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), James J. -
Reprogramming Glioma Cell Cultures with Retinoic Acid
Reprogramming glioma cell cultures with retinoic acid: Additional arguments for reappraising the potential of retinoic acid in the context of personalized glioma therapy Matthieu Dreyfus, Michèle El-Atifi, Magali Court, Marie Bidart, Charles Coutton, Céline Leclech, Bruno Ballester, Emmanuel Garcion, Ali Bouamrani, François Berger, et al. To cite this version: Matthieu Dreyfus, Michèle El-Atifi, Magali Court, Marie Bidart, Charles Coutton, et al.. Repro- gramming glioma cell cultures with retinoic acid: Additional arguments for reappraising the poten- tial of retinoic acid in the context of personalized glioma therapy. Glioma, 2018, 1 (2), pp.66-78. 10.4103/glioma.glioma_3_18. inserm-01959941 HAL Id: inserm-01959941 https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-01959941 Submitted on 19 Dec 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. [Downloaded free from http://www.jglioma.com on Monday, June 4, 2018, IP: 10.232.74.27] Original Article Reprogramming glioma cell cultures with retinoic acid: Additional arguments for reappraising the potential of retinoic acid in the context of personalized glioma therapy Matthieu Dreyfus1, Michèle El-Atifi1,2, Magali Court1, Marie Bidart1,2,3, Charles Coutton1,2, Céline Leclech1, Bruno Ballester1, Emmanuel Garcion4, Ali Bouamrani5, François Berger1,2,3, Didier Wion1 1INSERM UMR1205, 2280 Rue de la Piscine F, Saint Martin d'Hères, France. -
Download the PDF Here
Table S1. Analyzed genes FC: fold change; sign.: significantly changed Gene FC sign. FC sign. FC sign. Symbol Ensembl ID pre-diab vs C pre-diab. vs C T2DM vs C T2DM vs C t52 vs t0 t52 vs t0 MARCH2 ENSG00000099785 1.00 no 1.17 yes 1.00 no SEPT3 ENSG00000100167 1.00 no 1.00 no 1.00 no A2BP1 ENSG00000078328 1.00 no 1.00 no 1.00 no AAAS ENSG00000094914 1.00 no 1.00 no 1.00 no AACS ENSG00000081760 1.00 no 0.88 yes 1.14 yes AARS ENSG00000090861 1.00 no 1.00 no 1.00 no AASS ENSG00000008311 0.92 no 1.00 no 0.94 no ABCA7 ENSG00000064687 1.00 no 1.00 no 1.00 no ABCB1 ENSG00000085563 0.92 no 1.00 no 1.00 no ABCB11 ENSG00000073734 1.00 no 1.00 no 1.00 no ABCB4 ENSG00000005471 0.91 no 1.00 no 1.00 no ABCB5 ENSG00000004846 0.94 no 1.00 no 0.93 no ABCC2 ENSG00000023839 0.96 no 1.00 no 1.00 no ABCC6 ENSG00000091262 0.92 no 0.89 no 0.95 no ABCC8 ENSG00000006071 1.00 no 1.00 no 1.00 no ABCC9 ENSG00000069431 1.00 no 1.00 no 1.00 no ABCD1 ENSG00000101986 1.00 no 1.00 no 1.00 no ABCF2 ENSG00000033050 1.00 no 1.00 no 1.00 no ABHD12 ENSG00000100997 1.00 no 1.00 no 1.00 no ABHD14A ENSG00000042022 1.00 no 1.00 no 1.00 no ABHD4 ENSG00000100439 1.11 yes 1.13 yes 0.93 no ABHD5 ENSG00000011198 1.00 no 1.00 no 1.00 no ABL1 ENSG00000097007 1.10 yes 1.00 no 1.00 no ABLIM1 ENSG00000099204 1.00 no 1.00 no 0.78 yes ABP1 ENSG00000002726 0.93 no 1.00 no 1.00 no ACAA1 ENSG00000060971 1.00 no 1.00 no 1.00 no ACACB ENSG00000076555 1.00 no 1.00 no 1.00 no ACADVL ENSG00000072778 1.24 yes 1.14 yes 1.00 no ACAT1 ENSG00000075239 1.00 no 1.00 no 1.00 no ACCN4 ENSG00000072182 1.00