Air Quality Action Plan for Rushmoor Borough Council

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Air Quality Action Plan for Rushmoor Borough Council Local Air Quality Management Air Quality Action Plan for Rushmoor Borough Council May 2006 Rushmoor Borough Council Air Quality Action Plan Title: Local Air Quality Management - Air Quality Action Plan for Rushmoor Borough Council Report Ref: AQAP 1 Author of report Nicholas Jenkins Principal Pollution Control Officer Rushmoor Borough Council Environmental Health Services Council Offices Farnborough Road Farnborough GU14 7JU 01252 398135 [email protected] Name Signature Date Author: Nicholas Jenkins 31 May 2006 (Principal Pollution Control Officer) Approved Helen Lolley 31 May 2006 by: (Environmental Health Manager) This report is available to download (as .pdf) from Rushmoor’s website at: http://www.rushmoor.gov.uk/index.cfm?articleid=810 This report should be read with specific reference to Rushmoor Borough Council’s ‘Further Review & Assessment, 2005’ report. Page 2 of 110 Rushmoor Borough Council Air Quality Action Plan DEFRA ACTION PLAN REQUIREMENTS COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST This checklist has been introduced to indicate where the work expected by defra has been undertaken in relation to our Action Plan. Work area Included or Location within considered the report and comments Process Consideration of Policies Adherence to Guidelines • Have Statutory Consultees been consulted? Yes Section 5.4 • Have other LA departments been consulted? Yes Section 5.4 • Statement of problem causing AQMA Yes Section 2.2 & 3 • Have the principle sources of pollutants causing the Yes Section 3 exceedance been identified? • Have other LA plans/policies been considered? Yes Section 7.1.5 & 8 • Has an options timescale been included? Yes Section 6 & 7 • Have cost of options/plan been set out? Yes Section 6 & 7 • Have impacts been assessed? Yes Section 6 & 7 Process – Checklist of Measures • Have options been considered? Yes Section 6 & 7 • How many options have been considered? Twenty eight Section 6 & 7 • Have transport impacts been assessed? Yes Section 6 & 7 • Have air quality impacts been assessed – modelled Yes Section 6 & 7 or measured? • Have Socio-economic impacts been assessed? Considered Section 6 & 7 • Have other environmental impacts been assessed? Yes Section 6 & 7 (noise) • Have costs been considered? Yes Section 6 & 7 Appropriateness and Proportionality • Do measures seem appropriate to the problem? Yes Section 6 & 7 • Have the measures been assessed? Yes Section 6 & 7 • Are the measures likely to achieve the stated goal? Not individually, but Section 6 & 7 several together will. • Have the wider impacts been appraised Yes Section 6 & 7 appropriately? • Was the method of assessing costs appropriate? Yes Section 5.4, 6 & 7 • Is it likely for LAQM objectives to be met? Yes Throughout • Do the chosen measures comply with wider Yes Section 2 Government Policies Implementation • Are measures realistic in light of the objective Yes Throughout deadlines? • Have responsibilities been assigned to the relevant Yes Section 6 & 7 party? • Does the assigned party have the necessary Yes Section 6 & 7 powers? • Has financing been secured and who will pay? Not for all options Section 6, 7 & 9 Page 3 of 110 Rushmoor Borough Council Air Quality Action Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the UK, air pollutants come from a range of sources; these include transport (mainly road traffic), industry, domestic sources, aviation and natural sources. The Environment Act 1995 places a duty on local authorities to review and assess the air quality in their area for key pollutants against national standards and objectives laid down in the Air Quality (England) Regulations 2000 and Air Quality (England)(Amendments) Regulations 2002. Following the identification of a likely exceedance of the annual nitrogen dioxide (NO2) Air Quality Objective, Rushmoor designated an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA), in November 2004 between junctions 4 & 4a of the M3 motorway, extending 51 metres either side of the centreline. A map of this area is shown in Section 2.2. As a result we are required to prepare this Air Quality Action Plan. The action plan indicates what measures have been considered for reducing NO2 levels within the AQMA to meet the objective. It includes simple estimates of the costs involved in implementing each measure, the positive and negative effects of each measure both inside and outside of the AQMA and the feasibility of each action on a cost-effective basis. Other non air quality issues such as reduction in noise levels, improved road safety etc have also been considered. The estimates of cost and effectiveness categorised into low, medium or high. (See Appendix A). Rushmoor has worked with external organisations, and internal departments, in identifying the feasible measures included in the action plan and which organisations are responsible for implementing them. This action plan has identified two main categories of actions that affect the pollution levels within the AQMA and the borough. These are direct actions and indirect actions. The report concludes there are twenty feasible options out of twenty-eight that were considered and these are summarised in Appendix B. Page 4 of 110 Rushmoor Borough Council Air Quality Action Plan AIR QUALITY ACTION PLAN REPORT CONTENTS Section Title Page Contact details 2 Action plan compliance checklist 3 Executive summary 4 Air Quality Action Plan Report Contents 5 1 Structure of this report 8 2 Introduction & purpose of the action plan 9 2.1 Legislation & key pollutants 9 2.2 Local Air Quality Management history in Rushmoor 12 3 Sources of pollution in AQMA 14 4 Health impacts of nitrogen dioxide 16 5 Air Quality Action Plan 17 5.1 Air Quality Action Plan 17 5.2 Air Quality Action Plan Aims & Objectives 18 5.3 Timescales 19 5.4 Air Quality Action Plan consultees 19 5.5 Action Plan Matrix 20 6 Possible Direct Actions to improve air quality within the AQMA 21 6.1 Source apportionment 21 6.2 Direct action within the AQMA 21 6.2.1 Speed regulation and enforcement (Option 1) 22 6.2.2 Multiple-occupancy lanes and enforcement (Option 2) 25 6.2.3 Crawler lanes (Option 3) 27 6.2.4 Motorway tolls (Option 4) 29 6.2.5 Improve road signage (Option 5) 31 6.2.6 Enforce ‘driving on the left’ (Option 6) 33 6.2.7 Tree Planting (Option 7) 35 6.2.8 Overview of direct actions 37 Page 5 of 110 Rushmoor Borough Council Air Quality Action Plan 7 Possible indirect actions to improve air quality within the AQMA 38 7.1 Indirect actions outside the AQMA 38 7.1.1 Education 39 7.1.1.1 Enforce ‘driving on the left’ (Option 6) 40 7.1.1.2 Encourage alternative transport modes (Option 8) 42 7.1.1.3 Alternative fuel schemes or fuel efficient vehicles (Option 9) 44 7.1.1.4 Travelwise (Option 10) 46 7.1.1.5 Increase air quality information dissemination (Option 11) 48 7.1.1.6 General health education (Option 12) 50 7.1.1.7 Better driving techniques (Option 13) 52 7.1.1.8 Overview of indirect actions – education 54 7.1.2 Travel plans 55 7.1.2.1 Work travel plans (Option 14) 56 7.1.2.2 Safe routes to school (Option 15) 59 7.1.2.3 Rushmoor Borough Council travel plan (Option 16) 61 7.1.2.4 Overview of indirect action – travel plans 63 7.1.3 Enforcement 64 7.1.3.1 EPA90 and PPC99 (Option 17) 65 7.1.3.2 Clean Air Act 1993 (industrial smoke control) (Option 18) 67 7.1.3.3 EPA90 (statutory nuisance) (Option 19) 69 7.1.3.4 Overview of indirect actions - enforcement 71 7.1.4 Other road schemes 72 7.1.4.1 Improve east/west routes through Farnborough (Option 20) 73 7.1.4.2 Reduce junction congestion (Option 21) 75 7.1.4.3 Co-ordinate roadworks (Option 22) 77 7.1.4.4 Adjust speed limits on county roads (Option 23) 79 7.1.4.5 Overview of indirect actions – other road schemes 81 7.1.5 Planning 82 7.1.5.1 Local Development framework (Option 24) 83 7.1.5.2 Section 106 agreements (Option 25) 85 7.1.5.3 Overview of indirect actions - planning 87 7.1.6 Do nothing 88 Page 6 of 110 Rushmoor Borough Council Air Quality Action Plan 7.1.6.1 Do nothing (Option 26) 89 7.1.6.2 Overview of indirect actions – do nothing 91 7.1.7 Air quality monitoring 92 7.1.7.1 Air quality monitoring (Option 27) 93 7.1.7.2 Overview of air quality monitoring 95 8 Community Strategy for Rushmoor 96 8.1 Community Strategy (Option 28) 98 8.2 Overview of Community Strategy for Rushmoor 100 9 Option Funding 101 10 Glossary of terms and References 102 10.1 Glossary of terms 102 10.2 References 103 Appendices A AQAP matrix – All options considered 104 B AQAP matrix – Feasible options 108 Page 7 of 110 Rushmoor Borough Council Air Quality Action Plan 1 STRUCTURE OF THIS REPORT This report is structured as follows: Section 1 Overview of the sections in this report Section 2 Introduction & purpose of the action plan Section 3 Sources of pollution in the Air Quality Management Area Section 4 Health effects of nitrogen dioxide Section 5 Air quality action plan Section 6 Possible direct actions to improve air quality within the AQMA Section 7 Possible indirect actions to improve air quality within the AQMA Section 8 Community strategy for Rushmoor Section 9 Option funding Appendices Air quality action plan matrices Page 8 of 110 Rushmoor Borough Council Air Quality Action Plan 2 INTRODUCTION & PURPOSE OF THE ACTION PLAN 2.1 Legislation & Key Pollutants Modern day pollution sources, such as from industry and road traffic emissions, led to the development of a European Union directive on air quality.
Recommended publications
  • Postal Sector Council Alternative Sector Name Month (Dates)
    POSTAL COUNCIL ALTERNATIVE SECTOR NAME MONTH (DATES) SECTOR BN15 0 Adur District Council Sompting, Coombes 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN15 8 Adur District Council Lancing (Incl Sompting (South)) 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN15 9 Adur District Council Lancing (Incl Sompting (North)) 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN42 4 Adur District Council Southwick 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN43 5 Adur District Council Old Shoreham, Shoreham 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN43 6 Adur District Council Kingston By Sea, Shoreham-by-sea 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN12 5 Arun District Council Ferring, Goring-by-sea 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN16 1 Arun District Council East Preston 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN16 2 Arun District Council Rustington (South), Brighton 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN16 3 Arun District Council Rustington, Brighton 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN16 4 Arun District Council Angmering 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN17 5 Arun District Council Littlehampton (Incl Climping) 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN17 6 Arun District Council Littlehampton (Incl Wick) 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN17 7 Arun District Council Wick, Lyminster 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN18 0 Arun District Council Yapton, Walberton, Ford, Fontwell 02.12.20-03.01.21(excl Christmas holidays) BN18 9 Arun District Council Arundel (Incl Amberley, Poling, Warningcamp)
    [Show full text]
  • Local Election Candidates 2016 Full List
    Reading U.B.C. Abbey (1) Joe Sylvester Reading U.B.C. Battle (1) Alan Lockey Reading U.B.C. Caversham (1) David Foster Reading U.B.C. Church (1) Kathryn McCann Reading U.B.C. Katesgrove (1) Louise Keane Reading U.B.C. Kentwood (1) Ruth Shaffrey Reading U.B.C. Mapledurham (1) Brent Smith Reading U.B.C. Minster (1) Keith Johnson Reading U.B.C. Norcot (1) Jill Wigmore-Welsh Reading U.B.C. Park (1) Brenda McGonigle Reading U.B.C. Peppard (1) Sally Newman Reading U.B.C. Redlands (1) Kizzi Murtagh Reading U.B.C. Southcote (1) Doug Cresswell Reading U.B.C. Thames (1) Sarah McNamara Reading U.B.C. Tilehurst (1) Miriam Kennet Reading U.B.C. Whitley (1) Richard Black Wokingham U.D.C. Bulmershe & Whitegates (2) Adrian Windisch Wokingham U.D.C. Emmbrook (1) David Worley Wokingham U.D.C. Finchampstead North (1) Martyn Foss Wokingham U.D.C. Finchampstead South (1) Matthew Valler Wokingham U.D.C. Norreys (1) Anthea West Wokingham U.D.C. Remenham (1) Kezia Black Wokingham U.D.C. Shinfield South (1) Thomas Blomley Wokingham U.D.C. Wescott (1) David Chapman Wokingham U.D.C. Winnersh (1) Stephen Lloyd Milton Keynes B.C. Olney (1) Catherine Jean Rose Milton Keynes B.C. Stantonbury (1) Alexander Watson Fraser Milton Keynes B.C. Wolverton (1) Jennifer McElvie Marklew South Buckinghamshire B.C.Farnham Royal and Hedgerley (1) Ryan Sains Hastings B.C. Ashdown (1) Gabriel Carlyle Hastings B.C. Baird (1) Al Dixon Hastings B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead Area Local Authorities Covered by Funding Provisional 2020/21
    Lead area Local authorities covered by funding Provisional 2020/21 funding allocation Adur and Worthing £421,578.00 Arun £318,817.00 Ashford £257,000.00 Babergh Babergh and Mid Suffolk (lead) £163,498.00 West Suffolk Barking and Dagenham £184,703.00 Barnet £636,845.00 Barnsley £102,900.00 Basildon £474,871.00 Basingstoke and Deane £199,850.00 Bath and North East Somerset £417,151.00 Bedford £986,915.00 Birmingham £684,666.00 Blackburn with Darwen Hyndburn BC £184,000.00 Ribble Valley BC Burnley BC Pendle BC Rossendale BC Blackpool £200,000.00 Bolton £124,997.00 Boston £385,451.00 Bournemouth, Christchurch and £1,401,333.00 Poole Bracknell Forest £356,141.00 Bradford £461,320.00 Breckland £106,500.00 Brent £827,422.00 Brighton and Hove £2,042,637.00 Bristol, City of £2,814,768.00 Bromley £103,654.00 Broxbourne £119,380.00 Buckinghamshire Aylesbury Vale £576,500.00 Wycombe Chiltern South Bucks Bury £40,000.00 Calderdale £253,945.00 Cambridge £486,457.00 Cambridgeshire County Council £229,500.00 Camden £1,327,000.00 Canterbury £584,739.00 Carlisle (lead for all Cumbrian Allerdale Borough Council £416,340.00 authorities) Barrow Borough Council Carlisle City Council Copeland Borough Council Cumbria County Council Eden District Council South Lakeland District Council Central Bedfordshire £329,938.00 Cheshire East £438,329.30 Cheshire West and Chester £731,034.00 Chichester £230,465.00 City of London £590,300.00 Colchester £296,144.00 Corby East Northamptonshire £113,000.00 Kettering Wellingborough Cornwall £1,696,467.00 County Durham £269,128.35
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authorities Involved in LAD2, Organised Into County Area Consortia for the Purpose of the Scheme
    Local Authorities involved in LAD2, organised into county area consortia for the purpose of the scheme. Bedfordshire Bedford Borough Central Bedfordshire Luton Borough Milton Keynes Berkshire Bracknell Forest Reading Slough West Berkshire Windsor & Maidenhead Wokingham Buckinghamshire Buckinghamshire Council Cambridge Cambridge City East Cambridgeshire District Fenland District Council Huntingdonshire District Peterborough City Council South Cambridgeshire District East Sussex Eastbourne Borough Hastings Borough Lewes District Rother District Council Wealden District Council Essex Basildon Braintree Brentwood Borough Council Castle Point Chelmsford Colchester Epping Forest Harlow Maldon Rochford Southend on Sea Tendring Thurrock Uttlesford District Hampshire Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council East Hampshire District Council Hart District Council Rushmoor Borough Council Test Valley Borough Council Winchester City Council Hertfordshire Broxbourne Borough Dacorum Borough East Herts District Council Hertsmere Borough North Hertfordshire District St Albans City & District Stevenage Borough Three Rivers District Watford Borough Welwyn Hatfield Borough Kent Ashford Borough Council Canterbury City Council Dartford Borough Council Dover District Council Folkestone & Hythe District Council Gravesham Borough Council Maidstone Borough Council Medway Council Sevenoaks District Council Swale Borough Council Thanet District Council Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council Tunbridge Wells Borough Council London Barking & Dagenham Bexley Bromley Camden City
    [Show full text]
  • Name of Report Detail of Report
    Hampshire COVID-19 weekly datapack 4th June 2021 Data correct as of 3rd June 2021 but subject to revision Produced by the Public Health Team and the Insight and Engagement Unit What do weekly case rates per 100,000 population tell us about COVID-19 activity in England? Weekly rate: Week 20, 23rd May 2021 Weekly rate: Week 21, 30th May 2021 Source: Weekly Coronavirus Disease 2019 & Influenza (COVID-19) Surveillance Report Overall case rates increased in week 21. Case rates increased in most ethnic groups and in all age groups and regions. Overall Pillar 1 positivity remained stable while Pillar 2 positivity increased compared to the previous week, most notably in children aged 5 to 9 years. What do weekly case rates tell us about COVID-19 activity across South East regional local authorities? Reproduction number (R) and growth rate of COVID-19, 28th May 2021 Source: The R number in the UK Case rates across the South East have increased in the Reading, Rushmoor, Slough and Reigate & Banstead districts to 50-99.9 per 100,000 population. Cases rates remain below 49.9 per 100,000 population in all other districts. What do weekly cumulative case rates tell us about COVID-19 activity across ceremonial Hampshire? Trends suggest a slowing in the rise of infection rates across ceremonial Hampshire. Portsmouth City Council authority area has the highest cumulative case rate as of the 28th May 2021, although it is lower than the England rate. What do daily cases tell us about how the epidemic is progressing over time in Hampshire? During wave 1 only Pillar 1 (NHS/PHE laboratories) testing was available, this included people admitted to hospital and later people living or working in a health or care environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Hart, Rushmoor and Surrey Heath Water Cycle Study
    Water Submitted to Submitted by East Hampshire District Council AECOM Midpoint Alençon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom Hart, Rushmoor and Surrey Heath Water Cycle Study Final Report May 2017 AECOM Hart, Rushmoor and Surrey Heath WCS Page A-1 Appendix A. Relevant Planning Documents to the WCS Local Authority Category Document Name Publication Relevance Date All Water Blackwater Valley Water Cycle Study Scoping Report 2011 All Environment Thames River Basin District Management Plan (RBMP) 2015 Hart Flood Risk Hart Strategic Flood Risk Assessment November 2016 2016 Rushmoor Flood Risk Rushmoor Borough Council Level 1 SFRA Update 2015 Surrey Heath Flood Risk Surrey Heath SFRA 2015 All Housing Hart, Rushmoor and Surrey Heath Strategic Housing Market 2016 Assessment (SHMA) All Employment Hart, Rushmoor and Surrey Heath Joint Employment Land 2016 Review Surrey Heath Environment Biodiversity and Planning in Surrey 2014 Hart Environment Hart Biodiversity Action Plan 2012 - 2017 2012 Rushmoor Environment Rushmoor Biodiversity Action Plan 2016 - 2021 2016 All Environment Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area Delivery 2009 Framework Surrey Heath Water Affinity Water Final Water Resource Management Plan 2015 - 2014 2020 All Water South East Water Water Resource Management Plan 2015 - 2014 2040 All Climate United Kingdom Climate Projections 2009 (UKCP09) 2009 Change All Water Loddon abstraction licensing strategy 2013 Surrey Heath Water Thames abstraction licensing strategy 2014 Hart, Rushmoor and Surrey Heath WCS – Final Report May 2017 AECOM Hart, Rushmoor and Surrey Heath WCS Page B-2 Appendix B. Legislative Drivers Shaping the WCS Directive/Legislation/Guidance Description Birds Directive 2009/147/EC Provides for the designation of Special Protection Areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Safer North Hampshire
    Safer North Hampshire Partnership Plan 2013 - 2014 1 Contents Strategic Assessment Executive Summary 3 Away Day January 2013 9 Project Initiation and Development Grid 2013/14 11 Community Safety Partnership 13 Community Safety Partnership Management Group & Funding 14 Contact 15 Appendix 16 2 Strategic Assessment Executive Summary 1.1 Purpose Safer North Hampshire will produce a Strategic Assessment annually and review it every six months to ensure an intelligence-led business planning approach. Community Safety Partnerships (CSPs) can then be aware of the local priorities and alter their focus as problems in an area change. The aim of the document is to: Establish an accurate picture of current and emerging community safety trends and why they may have occurred Through the Partnership Plan, organise activity and allocate resources based on identified needs, both at local, area and county level Understand our performance and in doing so compare our effectiveness to other CSPs Inform the countywide Strategic Assessment 1.2 Methodology and limitations From 1 November 2012 Basingstoke and Deane, Hart and Rushmoor Community Safety Teams merged. As a result there have been some changes to the way in which Strategic Assessments are completed. There will now be a Safer North Hampshire document, which will summarise the common themes across the three areas and the issues local to Basingstoke and Deane, Hart and Rushmoor. In addition local area summaries will provide more information on identified local trends and issues. Priorities will be set using the scoring Matrix adopted by Hampshire Constabulary and modified for the CSP. Prior to the merger Strategic Assessment processes across Basingstoke and Deane, Hart and Rushmoor varied.
    [Show full text]
  • Easter Meet Open 2018 - 15/04/2018 Results
    Littlehampton Swimming Club HY-TEK's MEET MANAGER 7.0 - 7:05 AM 16/04/2018 Page 1 Easter Meet Open 2018 - 15/04/2018 Results Event 1 Boys 9 Year Olds 200 SC Meter IM Name Age Team Seed Time Finals Time 1 Matthew Lowther 9 Southampton Dolphins SC 3:28.55 3:18.71 41.85 1:26.30 2:33.97 3:18.71 2 Harley Williams 9 Hastings Seagull SC 3:22.39 3:18.85 39.54 1:29.15 2:37.38 3:18.85 3 Oliver Freemantle 9 Alton & District Swimming Club 3:59.00 3:47.59 48.42 1:49.76 2:57.13 3:47.59 --- Michal Urban 9 Mid Sussex Marlins SC 3:35.60 DQ 6.5 Not on the back at finish - back Event 1 Boys 10 Year Olds 200 SC Meter IM Name Age Team Seed Time Finals Time --- Jamie King 10 Fareham Nomads-SE 3:45.82 DQ 9.3 Finish of each stroke not in accordance with rules for the particular stroke - IM Event 1 Boys 11 Year Olds 200 SC Meter IM Name Age Team Seed Time Finals Time 1 George Hayward 11 Seaclose Swimming Club 2:59.93 2:59.14 37.70 1:24.06 2:19.56 2:59.14 2 Max Sydenham 11 Chichester Cormorants Swimming 3:15.75 3:03.96 42.25 1:31.46 2:24.69 3:03.96 3 Alex Beck 11 Worthing SC 3:13.39 3:07.60 40.77 1:27.66 2:26.83 3:07.60 4 Matthew Hull 11 Havant and Waterlooville SC 3:30.83 3:11.25 38.51 1:29.14 2:26.60 3:11.25 5 Freddie Lawler 11 Hastings Seagull SC 3:16.58 3:15.93 45.03 1:30.43 2:28.50 3:15.93 6 George Port 11 Alton & District Swimming Club 3:44.22 3:26.50 50.04 1:41.37 2:42.66 3:26.50 --- Jenson King 11 Romsey and Totton 3:38.40 DQ 9.3 Finish of each stroke not in accordance with rules for the particular stroke - IM Event 1 Boys 12 Year Olds 200 SC Meter IM Name
    [Show full text]
  • Results LC 09 2
    RESULTS SER Masters Senior Age Group Long Course Competition at K2 Crawley on 24th 25th January 2009 Note problems with the electronic timing during the meet meant that not all split times were recorded. MEN 50m Backstroke Key: M = Meet Record, B = British Record, E = European Record 18/24 Yrs Age Group 1 Kevin Pickard 21 Hastings SG M 29.81 2 Jonathan Glenny 19 Saxon Crown 32.87 25/29 Yrs Age Group 1 Josh Williamson 29 Guildford Ct M 32.05 2 Enrico Hahn 28 Otter 33.31 3 Broderick Aramyees 28 Saxon Crown 35.60 4 Andrew Stout 28 Reading 38.54 30/34 Yrs Age Group 1 James Weller 31 Spencer 31.76 2 Burini Correa 31 DDS Milano 33.56 3 Chris Luesley 30 Worthing 35.64 4 Jonathan Gray 31 Dorking 36.66 5 Marco Rovellini 31 DDS Milano 41.35 6 Paul Adams 31 Croydon Amph 41.82 7 Massimo Mondiani 32 DDS Milano 49.37 35/39 Yrs Age Group 1 Paul Allen 37 Boston 31.86 2 Fabio Gramegna 38 DDS Milano 33.69 3 Stephen Irwin 38 Kingston Roy 34.30 4 Nick Alford 36 Maidstone 34.69 5 Adam Harper 38 Brighton 35.27 6 Gavin Watson 38 Rushmoor Ryl 50.54 40/44 Yrs Age Group 1 Grant Robins 40 Royal Navy M 32.54 2 Andy Cook 41 Dorking 34.38 3 Paul French 44 Beckenham 39.09 4 Julian Elliman 41 Crawley 51.47 45/49 Yrs Age Group 1 Guy Emerson 46 Amersham M 32.83 2 Alan Parkins 49 Croydon Amph 35.30 3 John Prowting 48 Croydon Amph 35.71 4 Yon Marsh 49 Sevenoaks 41.54 5 Luca Madini 46 DDS Milano 41.64 50/54 Yrs Age Group 1 of 44 RESULTS SER Masters Senior Age Group Long Course Competition at K2 Crawley on 24th 25th January 2009 1 Carl Mullender 54 Haslemere 37.49 55/59 Yrs
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authorities Adur & Worthing District Council Allerdale Borough
    Local Authorities Adur & Worthing District Council Allerdale Borough Council Amber Valley Borough Council Anglia Revenues Partnership Arun District Council Ashford Borough Council Aylesbury Vale District Council Barnet L.B Barrow-in-Furness Borough Council Basildon District Council Basingstoke & Deane Council Bath & North East Somerset Council Bedfordshire County Council Birmingham City Council Blaby District Council Blackburn District Council Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council Blackpool Borough Council Blaenau Gwent County Council Bolton Council Boston Borough Council Bracknell Forest Borough Council Braintree District Council Brent Council Bridgenorth District Council Brighton & Hove City Council Bristol City Council Bromsgrove District Council Buckinghamshire County Council Burnley Borough Council Caerphilly County Borough Council Cambridge City Council Cambridgeshire County Council Camden L.B Cannock Chase District Council Cheltenham Borough Council Cherwell Valley District Council Chiltern District Council Copeland Borough Council Cornwall Council Cotswold District Council Coventry City Council Croydon L.B Cumbria County Council Dacorum Council Darlington Borough Council Daventry District Council Denbighshire CC Derbyshire County Council Devon County Council Dorset County Council Durham County Council Ealing L.B East Ayreshire Council East Dumbartonshire Council East Hertfordshire Council East Northamptonshire Council East Riding of Yorkshire Council Eastbourne Borough Council Ellesmere Port & Neston Borough Council Enfield L.B
    [Show full text]
  • Council Tax Support Task and Finish Group
    CABINET COUNCIL TAX SUPPORT TASK AND FINISH GROUP COUNCILLOR DIANE BEDFORD (CHAIRMAN) REPORT NO. FIN1934 10 DECEMBER 2019 KEY DECISION: NO COUNCIL TAX SUPPORT SCHEME 2020/21 SUMMARY This report sets out the work undertaken by the Council Tax Support Task and Finish Group to review the Council’s Council Tax Support Scheme (CTSS) and recommends action as follows. RECOMMENDATIONS Cabinet are requested to: 1. Recommend to full council that the existing scheme is continued for 2020/21 2. Note the deliberations and considerations of the Council Tax Support Task and Finish Group in arriving at recommendation 1 above 3. Note that the group have recommended a review of the current CTSS starting in 2020 as a result of the following factors: • As Universal Credit (UC) continues to roll out in Rushmoor there are emerging issues which show that the current CTS scheme is moving away from being compatible with the new benefit • Long Term affordability issues • The current scheme is complex and needs to be easier to administer and easier to understand for residents. 1. BACKGROUND 1.1. Since 1st April 2013 local authorities have been providing their own CTSS to replace the previous national Council Tax Benefit Regulations, which had supported residents with their Council Tax costs. 1.2. Whilst local authorities have the freedom to set their own local schemes, based on local circumstances and needs, local authorities are required to provide pensioners with the same level of support received under the previous national Council Tax Benefit arrangements. 1.3. Accordingly, most local authorities have devised hybrid schemes, whereby those of pensionable age receive up to 100% of their Council Tax bill in support, whilst the maximum level of support for working age customers is typically lower and a range of other local adjustments have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • Diocese of Guildford 2019
    Help for those in Need Crisis Support across the Diocese of Guildford featuring: Page 2 How to Help Homeless People 6 Other Sources of Help 7 Debt Advice 8 Counselling Services 9 Homelessness Useful Contacts / Key agencies 10 Homelessness Reduction Act - Council’s responsibility 14 Foodbanks / Emergency Housing by Borough including: Day Centres / hostels / furniture How to Help Homeless people A Guide of Clergy, Staff and Parishes Leaflet available from www.churchhousingtrust.org.uk The number of homeless people is increasing, and some of them will turn to the local church for help. It can be hard to know how to help because homeless people often have multiple needs, and accessing support services is complicated. The purpose of this guide is to help churches respond to this growing need safely and effectively. There are many reasons why people lose their home. It may be through relationship breakdown, physical or mental illness, debt, addiction, or simply the end of a tenancy. There are also those who grew up in an abusive household or in care, and have never had a truly safe and secure place to call home. Every homeless person is an individual with their own unique story. It is important to show an interest, and listen to them. This guide gives information on helping people at different stages of homelessness: from those about to be evicted, to the long-term rough sleepers who call asking for money. It also gives advice on personal safety, and practical ways in which your church can help. Usually the best way to help someone is to put them in touch with local services.
    [Show full text]