Safer North Hampshire

Home , Rushmoor

Partnership Plan 2013 - 2014

Contents

Strategic Assessment Executive Summary 3

Away Day January 2013 9

Project Initiation and Development Grid 2013/14 11

Community Safety Partnership 13

Community Safety Partnership Management Group & Funding 14

Contact 15

Appendix 16

Strategic Assessment Executive Summary

1.1 Purpose

Safer North Hampshire will produce a Strategic Assessment annually and review it every six months to ensure an intelligence-led business planning approach. Community Safety Partnerships (CSPs) can then be aware of the local priorities and alter their focus as problems in an area change.

The aim of the document is to:  Establish an accurate picture of current and emerging community safety trends and why they may have occurred  Through the Partnership Plan, organise activity and allocate resources based on identified needs, both at local, area and county level  Understand our performance and in doing so compare our effectiveness to other CSPs  Inform the countywide Strategic Assessment

1.2 Methodology and limitations

From 1 November 2012 Basingstoke and Deane, Hart and Rushmoor Community Safety Teams merged. As a result there have been some changes to the way in which Strategic Assessments are completed. There will now be a Safer North Hampshire document, which will summarise the common themes across the three areas and the issues local to Basingstoke and Deane, Hart and Rushmoor. In addition local area summaries will provide more information on identified local trends and issues. Priorities will be set using the scoring Matrix adopted by Hampshire Constabulary and modified for the CSP.

Prior to the merger Strategic Assessment processes across Basingstoke and Deane, Hart and Rushmoor varied. This six month assessment is intended to align the three areas and create a starting point upon which future assessments will be based.

The current assessment is based on data from 1 April 2012 to 30 September 2012, with comparisons to previous years where appropriate.

To ensure a partnership and holistic approach, data from a range of partners has been used throughout this assessment.

Data contained in this report has been referenced with the supporting source, and relevant graphs and tables appear throughout the text and in appendices.

It is acknowledged that under-reporting is a particular problem in relation to crime. Consequently, this assessment will only reflect those crimes and incidents that have been reported to the relevant agencies and recorded in the correct manner. Data in relation to offenders is reliant on whether they have been caught. Some fields are not completed and therefore show as blank or not stated. Additionally there will be slight differences in the ways which local areas record data. When interpreting the findings it is important to be aware of this.

2. DATA TABLE

Crime Type – Safer North 01.04.11 – 01.04.12 – %change & No Hampshire Area 30.09.11 30.09.12 Anti-social behaviour Total anti-social behaviour 6818 6557 -3.8% (n=261) ASB Environmental 715 561 -21.5% (n=154) ASB Personal 2435 2386 -2.0% (n=49) ASB Nuisance 3668 3610 -1.6% (n=58) Repeat Victims of ASB No data No data No data Criminal damage Criminal damage and arson 1867 1441 -22.8% (n=426) HFRS arson 240 116 -51.7% (n=124) Graffiti 370 375 +1.4% (n=5) Fly-tipping No data 1738 No data NTE issues Violence against the person 226 154 -31.9% (n=72) Anti-social behavior 319 336 +5.3% (n17) Criminal damage 86 63 -26.7% (n=23) Violent offences Total violent crime 2654 2207 -16.8% (n=447) Violence against the person 2424 2034 -16.1% (n=390) Sexual offences 157 127 -19.1% (n=30) Robbery 73 46 -37.0% (n=27) Domestic assaults (ABH, common assault 439 408 -7.1% (n=31) & battery) Domestic incidents 2054 1936 -5.7% (n=118) Repeat domestic incidents 873 869 -0.5% (n=4) Acquisitive crime Serious acquisitive crime 1382 835 -39.6% (n=547) Burglary dwelling 478 226 -52.7% (n=252) Burglary non dwelling 973 660 -32.2% (n=313) Theft of motor vehicle 249 135 -45.8% (n=114) Theft from motor vehicle 582 429 -26.3% (n=153) Other theft and handling 1958 1492 -23.8% (n=466) Shop theft 896 721 -19.5% (n=175) Fraud and forgery 720 433 -39.9% (n=287) Other crime types Drug offences 583 538 -7.7% (n=45) Alcohol related offences 1227 861 -29.8% (n=366) Hate crime 80 81 +1.3% (n=1) YOT Substantive Outcome 429 454 +5.8% (n=25)

YOT First Time Entrants 125 87 -30.4% (n=38) Feeling Safe No data No data No data Door Step Crime No data No data No data Community Tension No data No data No data Total crime 11123 8434 -24.2% (n=2689)

3. SCANNING

3.1 Summary of identified issues

1. Anti-social behaviour (ASB) – ASB was widespread across Basingstoke and Deane, Hart and Rushmoor and was the single most common incident type in each area. In Basingstoke and Deane ASB increased by 2% on the same time in 2011. Incidents classed as ASB Nuisance were the most common across all three areas. The town centre beats were among the top locations for ASB with a large number of incidents linked to the night time economy. In all three areas ASB increased slightly at the weekend and peaked between 4pm and midnight. ASB scored 128 on the Safer North Hampshire Matrix, the second highest of all incident types.

2. Criminal damage – Significant reductions in criminal damage were made in Basingstoke and Deane, Hart and Rushmoor. When compared to Most Similar Family Groups all three areas ranked 8/15 areas for criminal damage and arson. In all three areas damage to vehicles was the most common, offences increased at the weekend and peaked between 5pm and midnight. Criminal damage scored 96 on the Safer North Hampshire Matrix.

3. HFRS Arson – Significant reductions in levels of arson were recorded by Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service across all three areas. Refuse and grass fires were most common in Basingstoke and Deane, Hart and Rushmoor. Arson peaked in April and levels were fairly low during the summer months in comparison to previous years. Arson scored 57 on the Safer North Hampshire Matrix.

4. Fly-tipping – Reports of fly-tipping increased significantly in Rushmoor, although it is currently not known why this rise occurred. Fly-tipping was also widespread in Basingstoke and Deane. Fly tipping scored 60 on the Safer North Hampshire Matrix.

5. Violent crime – Violence against the person offences contributed the majority of violent crime across Basingstoke and Deane, Hart and Rushmoor. Reductions in this offence type were seen in all three areas. The town centre beats experienced the highest numbers of offences and much of this was linked to the night time economy. Assault and public order offences were the most widespread types of violence against the person. Violence against the person scored 108 on the Safer North Hampshire Matrix.

The number of sexual offences also reduced in all three areas. They scored 30 on the Safer North Hampshire Matrix.

Robbery was the lowest level violent crime type with reductions seen in Basingstoke and Deane and Hart. Robbery in Rushmoor increased by one offence compared to the same time in 2011 but offences remained low in numbers. Previously cash in transit robberies had been identified as a risk to Rushmoor district. During the current assessment period there were no such offences. Robbery scored 30 on the Safer North Hampshire Matrix.

6. Domestic abuse – Domestic assaults, domestic incidents and repeat domestic incidents contribute a large proportion of violence against the person offences in all three areas. Raising awareness and reducing the number of repeat victims have been identified as areas for improvement across Safer North Hampshire. Domestic abuse scored 132 on the Safer North Hampshire Matrix the highest of any incident type.

7. Night time economy offences (NTE) – NTE offences were common in all three areas, particularly town centre beats where approximately a third of all crime occurred between 10pm and 3am. Violence against the person, criminal damage and ASB were linked to the night time economy in all three areas. NTE offences scored 124 on the Safer North Hampshire Matrix, the third highest off all incident types.

8. Drug and alcohol related offences – The number of drug offences recorded was highly dependent on police activity rather than trends in the level of offending. While Basingstoke and Deane and Hart experienced reductions, drug offences in Rushmoor increased slightly due to a police operation. Possession and supply of cannabis accounted for the majority of offences in all three areas. Rushmoor had the highest percentage of class A offences.

Despite reductions in all three areas a large proportion of crime in Basingstoke and Deane, Hart and Rushmoor was linked to alcohol, particularly violent crime, criminal damage and ASB. The town centre beats experienced the most offences, which were often NTE related. Substance misuse related issues scored 120 on the Safer North Hampshire Matrix.

9. Hate crime – Reported hate crimes were very low level across all three areas. While offences in Basingstoke and Deane and Hart reduced Rushmoor experienced a slight rise. This rise was in offences relating to sexual orientation and honor based violence. Offences relating to the Nepali community were low and down on the same time in 2011. Hate crime scored 57 on the Safer North Hampshire Matrix.

10. First Time Entrants to the Youth Justice System –The number of first time entrants to the youth justice system reduced in all three areas. FTEs scored 81 on the Safer North Hampshire Matrix.

11. Acquisitive crime – Significant improvements in acquisitive crime have been seen during the assessment period. Garage and shed breaks have been identified as common targets across the three areas while theft was common around the town centre beats. Vehicle crime increased in Rushmoor but remains low. Acquisitive crime scored 90 on the Safer North Hampshire Matrix.

3.0 SAFER NORTH HAMPSHIRE IDENTIFIED PRIORITIES

 Domestic abuse (132) o Raising awareness and increasing reporting o Reducing the number of repeat victims

 Anti-social behaviour (128) o Work around hotspot locations at key times o Night time economy related ASB o Work around repeat and vulnerable victims

 Night Time Economy issues (124) o Reducing violent crime, criminal damage and ASB 10pm to 3am

 Substance misuse related issues (120) o Drug and alcohol related offending o Role in night time economy issues

4.0 BASINGSTOKE AND DEANE IDENTIFIED PRIORITIES

 Town Centre (124) Basingstoke town centre recorded the highest number of offences and was one of, if not the top location, for most crime types. Total anti-social behaviour in the town centre increased by 19% with night time economy related ASB up 56%. The town centre consistently experiences the most violent and alcohol related crime and night time economy issues accounted for 26% of total crime here. The town centre is regularly discussed at the CTCG and has a major impact on the partnerships resources. The town centre scored 124 on the Basingstoke and Deane Matrix.

 South Ham (112) South Ham was the overall top location for anti-social behaviour, with reports up 143% on the previous year. It was an ASB hotspot for the partnership for the whole assessment period and this remains the case. South Ham is also identified as a common location for violent crime and domestic abuse. South Ham scored 112 on the Basingstoke and Deane Matrix.

 Violence against the person (108) Violence against the person is the biggest contributor to violent crime and accounts for the second largest proportion of reports to the police after anti- social behaviour. Basingstoke town centre experienced the most violence against the person and much of this is linked to the night time economy. Away from the town centre offences were often committed by someone the victim

knew. Violence against the person scored 108 on the Basingstoke and Deane Matrix.

5.0 HART IDENTIFIED PRIORITIES

 Fleet (124) Based on the total number of offences Fleet recorded the most crime during the assessment period, accounting for more than a quarter of all crime in Hart. Fleet was also the top location for anti-social behaviour. Fleet consistently experiences the most criminal damage, violent crime, domestic abuse and substance misuse, and night time economy related issues accounted for 33% of total crime here. Fleet is regularly discussed through the CTCG. Fleet scored 124 on the Hart Matrix.

 Acquisitive crime (120) Despite reductions, acquisitive crime scored 120 on the Hart Matrix. Acquisitive crime accounted for 57% of total crime in Hart, more than Basingstoke (48%) and Rushmoor (47%).

6.0 RUSHMOOR IDENTIFIED PRIORITIES

 Wellington (124) During the assessment period, Wellington recorded the most crime and anti- social behaviour in Rushmoor. Wellington consistently experiences the most violent and alcohol related crime and night time economy related issues accounted for 32% of total crime here. Wellington scored 124 on the Rushmoor Matrix.

 Hate crime (114) Although reports of hate crime are low, Rushmoor was the only area of the three to experience an increase in reports (+10%) during the assessment period. Issues around BME communities have a large impact on the partnership. Hate crime scored 114 on the Rushmoor Matrix.

 Violence against the person (108) Violence against the person is the biggest contributor to violent crime and accounts for the second largest proportion of reports to the police after anti- social behaviour. Wellington experiences the most violence against the person and much of this is linked to the night time economy. Away from the here offences were often committed by someone the victim knew. Violence against the person scored 108 on the Rushmoor Matrix.

 Cherrywood (100) Based on offences per 1,000 population Cherrywood had one of the highest levels of crime and anti-social behaviour in Rushmoor. Cherrywood also

experienced the most criminal damage, arson, domestic assaults and drug offences. It also has a significant impact on the partnerships resources. Cherrywood scored 100 on the Rushmoor Matrix.

Away Day January 2013

Community Safety Partners were invited to an Away Day held in January 2013. The focus of the day was to: look at current service provision against priority areas, to identify gaps in provision, best practice, project development or new projects required to bridge gaps in provision.

It is important to note that a number of projects established as a result of previous Action Plans continue to operate with the support of respective Community Safety Partnerships, reporting progress to the management group on a regular basis.

The Away Day focused on the priorities as identified by the Strategic Assessment, with attendees split into breakout groups.

Following the Away Day information gathered was collated into this Partnership Service Plan for action in the financial year 2013 – 14.

Progress will be monitored throughout the year via email and through attendance at sub-groups of the Community Safety Partnership. Partners will be expected to submit progress reports to Management Groups. Reports operate on a traffic light system.

Green The project is progressing well and is expected to deliver Amber The project is progressing however there are barriers to overcome Red The project is not progressing and is not expected to deliver

Overall responsibility for the success of the projects will fall to the CSP Management Group. If a project is at risk or requires intervention to ensure success, the Management Team will intervene to make any necessary changes.

Project Initiation and Development Summary Grid 2013– 14*

Theme Project Lead(s) Details / Aims Anti-Social ASB Assemblies Sam Hexter-Andrews - New ASB assembly to be used across Safer North Hampshire Schools Behaviour - Liaison and delivery via local SNTs where possible LIFE Course Development Richard Denham - Re-introduction of LIFE course to Basingstoke area Martin Walters - Associated press Gary Sloan Victim Support Development Dan Gill - Link in with Sentinel Housing’s Victim Support scheme to evaluate good practice and raise profile David Lipscombe Pubwatch Development Richard Denham - Look at potential for expanding exclusion zones across 3 areas Rob Wallis - Better joint working with CCTV - Joint Terms of Reference Neighbourhood Watch David Lipscombe - Coordination of NHW over 3 areas Development - Promotion of schemes and closer working Safer North Hampshire ASB James Knight - Introduction of uniform ASB procedure across Safer North Hampshire Policy Sam Charlton - Uniform warning letter system including delivery via local officers - Section 59 policy/information pack (liaison with RPU) Graffiti Focus Week Richard Denham - Rolling out of Graffiti Focus Week into Rushmoor Community Payback David Lipscombe - Map Community Payback work across the 3 areas Development Richard Denham - Scope for improved community participation/projects Register of initiatives Richard Denham - Central register of local community safety initiatives, including activities for young people via LCP - Linking of local initiatives on Safety Net Ad-hoc action days/weeks All - CREW type initiatives in problem areas - Ad-hoc and tailored to particular issues - Referral via CTCG process Designated Public Place Orders David Lipscombe - Review locations across all 3 districts and whether fit for purpose Moray Henderson - Refresh of signage where appropriate Andrew Wake ASB Gaps James Knight - Review of individuals who don’t meet the criteria for Trouble Families Group or ASB Panel - Action plan created to meet individuals needs and ensure they don’t fall by the wayside Rural Crime Initiative David Lipscombe - Rural roadshows focusing on acquisitive crime Caroline Ryan - Supply of high quality crime prevention materials at cost price to farmers etc

- Rebranding of ‘Safer’ Vehicles from Hart and Rushmoor with ‘Safer North Hampshire’ branding to be used in roadshows - Funding received from PCC Challenge & Change Course James Knight - 6 week course looking at challenging individuals perceptions and providing education so as to Caroline Ryan discourage anti-social behaviour - Including visits from Police, Magistrates, victims and trips to local Prison - Funding received from PCC Night Time Health Information Sam Charlton - Health information fed into police analysts allowing resources to be directed as needed Economy Neil Luckett Young people & alcohol Working Party(1) - Project exploring attitudes and beliefs of young people regarding alcohol use e.g. drivers for mapping consumption - Use information gathered to develop hard hitting prevention campaign Conditional Cautioning Caroline Ryan - Research Conditional Cautioning Pilot from Portsmouth and establish whether viable to roll out Violence Awareness Course Sarah Jackson into North Hampshire area replacement Purple Flag Scheme Local - Identify best practice from Purple Flag Schemes and Basingstoke application Authority/Police - Look at suitability for SNH areas Licensing Substance Engage hard to reach/minority Sam Hexter-Andrews - Presentations to local minority groups on substance misuse issues Misuse groups - Parent awareness campaigns Myth Busting Sam Hexter-Andrews - Myth busting on legal highs through education programme - Link in with previous BDBC campaign material Social Enterprise Mapping Working Party(2) - Explore social enterprise opportunities for recovering addicts who are working with Adult Services - Scope diversionary activities that are better suited to this demographic Street Drinkers Working Party(3) - Explore positive responses to street drinkers and the issues that they cause across the area Domestic Targeted information/literature NE Hants DV Forum - Review of DA literature across leaflets, internet and social working to ensure meeting the needs Abuse to all those who access it including hard to reach groups (males, LGBT, minority groups) - Review of other agencies links and information, and attempting to link in better e.g. Neighbourhood Watch Support Services NE Hants DV Forum - To ensure that group/peer based support continues to be available, addressing the need to respond to low self esteem levels and reduce repeat victimisation Awareness campaign NE Hants DV Forum - Promoting: o Changes to DV definition o Barcode keyrings/cans etc o White Ribbon Day Training NE Hants DV Forum - Training for partner agencies to allow signposting e.g. Street Pastors

*See Appendix 1 for full details and milestones

Working Party (1) (provisional) Inspector Marcus Cator Inspector Jon Turton YOT Annette Davolls (IOM) Vicky O’Hare Sergeant David Hill Sammy Hexter-Andrews Marianne Rosamund ACSOs

Working Party (2) (provisional) Caroline Ryan Darren Barrett James Knight Sam Hexter Andrews Jackie Markey (IOM) Neil Luckett

Working Party (3) (provisional) James Knight Police Licensing SNT Senior Level Sam Hexter-Andrews Shared Legal Services IOM/Society of St. James

Community Safety Partnerships

Safer North Hampshire consists of approximately 30 agencies across three separate Partnerships, including:

 Adult Services  Aldershot Town Football Club  Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council  Children’s Services  Citizens’ Advice Bureau  North East Hants Domestic Violence Forum  Drug & Alcohol Action Team  First Wessex Housing  Fleet Phoenix  Hart District Association of Parish Councils  Hart District Council  Hart Voluntary Action  Hart Youth Team  Hampshire Fire & Rescue Service  Hampshire Constabulary  Hampshire County Council  Hampshire Fire Authority  Inclusion Hampshire  Local Strategic Partnership  NHS Hampshire Primary Care Trust  North Hampshire Magistrates  Office of the Police & Crime Commissioner  Rushmoor Borough Council  Rushmoor Voluntary Services  Sentinel Housing Association  Thames Valley Housing Association  The Probation Trust  Victim Suppport  Wessex Youth Offending Team

The Partnerships meet regularly and it is their role to pool resources to tackle crime, disorder and anti-social behaviour issues identified within the Safer North Hampshire area.

Community Safety Partnership Management Group The Community Safety Partnership Management Group meet across the North Hampshire area, and includes representatives from:

 Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council  Hampshire Constabulary  Hampshire County Council  Hampshire Fire & Rescue Service  Hampshire Fire Authority  Hampshire Primary Care Trust  Hampshire Youth Offending Team  Hart District Council  North East Hampshire Domestic Violence Forum  Rushmoor Borough Council  The Probation Trust

All the above have a legal responsibility toward Community Safety and are known as the Management Group.

The Management Group steer the work of the respective Partnerships and ensure that projects identified in the Service Plan are running effectively and in line with aims of the Strategy. Safer North Hampshire Community Safety Team compiles regular reports for both the full partnership and management group to enable valuable evaluation and monitoring to take place.

The Management Group meet 3 times a year.

Funding The Community Safety Partnership Management Group are responsible for bid funding, with money available for local charities and organisations. Bids are discussed at Management Group meetings, with decisions made on a majority vote as to whether the bid meets the local Community Safety agenda.

As with the Service Plan regular updates and evaluation are required for bid money granted, with a final report also requested.

Contact

Tel: 01252 398399

Email: [email protected]

Web: www.safernh.co.uk

Twitter: @SaferNorthHants

Post: Safer North Hampshire Rushmoor Borough Council Farnborough Road Farnborough Hampshire GU14 7JU

Appendix 1

Milestone Due Action Code & Title Expected Outcome Due Date Milestone Description Date Idenitfy SNT Officers across Safer North Hampshire area 31-May-2013 to help deliver assemblies Increased awareness of ASB ASB1 Anti-Social Behaviour issues amongst young 31-Mar- Write new ASB assembly 31-May-2013 Assemblies people, reduction in ASB 2014 Deliver ASB Summer 31-Jul-2013 incidents. Assemblies Deliver Autum/Winter ASB 31-Oct-2013 Assemblies Scope potenital to re- ASB2 LIFE Course Availability of LIFE course to 31-Mar- introduce LIFE course to 30-Jun-2013 Development Basingstoke residents 2014 Basginstoke area with HFRS contact Scope extent of Sentinel work with Victim Support and 30-Sep-2013 whether any best practice ASB3 Victim Support Greater awareness of victim 31-Mar- Explore ways of helping to Development support services. 2014 promote Victim Support 31-Oct-2013 service Link in Victim Support contact 31-Oct-2013 for relevant cases Put in bid for resources to 01-Apr-2013 PCC Hold meetings with NHW representatives from all 3 31-May-2013 ASB4 Neighbourhood Watch Increased awareness of 31-Mar- areas Development Neighbourhood Watch. 2014 Establish best practice across 30-Jun-2013 3 areas Scope appetite for formal North Hampshire 31-Oct-2013 Neighbourhood Watch Development of new Policy 31-May-2013 Uniform response to ASB ASB5 Safer North Hampshire 31-Mar- Distribution of new Policy for across Safer North 30-Sep-2013 ASB Policy 2014 comment Hampshire area. Introduction of new Policy 10-Dec-2013 Scope extent of graffiti issues 30-Apr-2013 in Basingstoke and Rushmoor Establish need to hold Graffiti 31-May-2013 Focus Week Liaise with those responsible for removal in Basingstoke 31-May-2013 Expansion of Graffiti Focus 31-Mar- and Rushmoor ASB6 Graffiti Focus Week Week where appropriate. 2014 Hold Graffiti Focus Weeks in 13-Sep-2013 Hart and Rushmoor Review success of Rushmoor 30-Sep-2013 Graffiti Focus Week with RBC Look to hold further Graffiti Focus Week's in Hart and 31-Mar-2014 Rushmoor if needed Scope Community Payback provision in Basingstoke and 31-May-2013 Rushmoor. Expansion of Community ASB7 Community Payback 31-Mar- Payback into relevant Scope Community Projects in Development 2014 31-Jul-2013 Community Projects. Basingstoke and Rushmoor Establish work programme 30-Sep-2013 where possible. Increased awareness of 31-Mar- Collate information into ASB8 Register of Initiatives 30-Apr-2013 provision available. 2014 document and distribute to

Milestone Due Action Code & Title Expected Outcome Due Date Milestone Description Date relevant agencies Research initiatives and youth 30-Apr-2013 provision in Hart Scope similar provision in 30-Sep-2013 Basingstoke and Rushmoor Collate information for Basingstoke and Rushmoor 31-Oct-2013 and distribute Ensure regular updates of all 31-Mar-2014 information Reduction in crime and anti- Ad-hoc action days/week 31-Mar- ASB9 Ad-hoc Action Days social behaviour in problem where problem areas 31-Mar-2014 2014 areas. identified Collate list of all DPPOs across Safer North Hampshire 31-May-2013 area Visit each DPPO to check 31-Aug-2013 signage etc Establish whether DPPOs in ASB10 Designated Public 31-Mar- Contact patrolling officers in appropriate areas, and Place Orders Review 2014 relevant areas to evaluate 30-Sep-2013 whether well used. usage Introduce new areas if 30-Nov-2013 needed Repeal any areas if not used 30-Nov-2013 or not proportionate Establish whether any service 30-Jun-2013 gaps Review existing provision for 30-Jun-2013 Individuals catered for at all 31-Mar- those commiting ASB ASB11 ASB Gaps levels. 2014 Seek to put new provision in place e.g. Behavioural 31-Aug-2013 Change course Introduce new Victim Policy 31-Oct-2013 Hold multi-agency meeting to discuss funding and project 02-Jul-2013 plan Arrange re-branding of 'Safer' Vehicles from Hart & 31-Jul-2013 Rushmoor 31-Mar- ASB12 Op: Stronghold Reduction in rural crime 2014 Liaise with Countrywatch on 31-Aug-2013 location of roadshows Source high quality crime 31-Aug-2013 prevention materials Hold roadshows throughout 31-Dec-2013 Safer North Hampshire area Create and launch 01-Oct-2013 programme for referrals Run Pilot programme 31-Oct-2013 ASB13 Challenge & Change Reduction in anti-social 31-Mar- Programme behaviour 2014 Evaluate pilot 16-Dec-2013 Evaluate whether pgoramme has had intended effect on 31-Mar-2014 attendees Review current DV literature 31-May-2013 Review DV internet 31-May-2013 information Refreshed and up to date DV DV1 Targeted information 31-Mar- information available to Review DV social networking and literature review 2014 31-May-2013 public. information Review of partner agencies information and refresh as 31-Jul-2013 appropriate 18

Milestone Due Action Code & Title Expected Outcome Due Date Milestone Description Date Seek funding for continuation Work addressing repeat 31-May-2013 DV2 Support Service victimisation and the need 31-Mar- of services where applicable Continuation to respond to low self 2014 Promote services to partners 31-Mar-2014 esteem continue. to ensure maximum take up Establish working party to decide campaign specifics and 30-Jun-2013 area Promote changes to DV 30-Jun-2013 Increased reporting of 31-Mar- definition DV3 Awareness Campaign Domestic Abuse issues. 2014 Link in with Aldershot Football Club for campaign and 30-Sep-2013 Workplace Policy Promote White Ribbon Day - 25-Nov-2013 25th November 2013 Clearstone Trust - CJS 24-Apr-2013 IAG - Domestic Abuse 24-Apr-2013 Investigation Maddhat Shamuha- Domestic 03-May-2013 Abuse Multi-agency - Occupation 07-May-2013 Orders Mutli-agency - RA & MARAC 07-May-2013 Multi-agency - SafetyNet 06-Jun-2013 Frimley Park A&E - Domestic 07-Jun-2013 Abuse Awareness Multi-agency - Legal 11-Jun-2013 Remedies Frimley Park A&E - Domestic 12-Jun-2013 Abuse Awareness Royal Navy Police - RA & Increased knowledge of 17-Jun-2013 31-Mar- MARAC DV4 Domestic Abuse Training Domestic Abuse issues and 2014 referrals. Frimley Park A&E - Domestic 18-Jun-2013 Abuse Awareness Frimley Park A&E - Domestic 21-Jun-2013 Abuse Awareness Princes Gardens GP surgery - 08-Jul-2013 Nepali Domestic Abuse Neighbourhood Watch - 10-Jul-2013 Domestic Abuse First Wessex - DASH 19-Jul-2013 Frimley Park A&E - Domestic 23-Jul-2013 Abuse Awareness Nepali ESOL session - Safety 21-Aug-2013 planning and DA Frimley Park A&E - Domestic 23-Aug-2013 Abuse Awareness Frimley Park A&E - Domestic 03-Sep-2013 Abuse Awareness Allocate resources as 31-Mar-2014 appropriate Ensuring resources directed 31-Mar- Feed information into Police NTE1 Health Information 31-Mar-2014 as appropriate. 2014 anaylsts Monitor health information via 31-Mar-2014 partners

Better understanding of Establish working group 30-Jul-2013 NTE2 Young Person Alcohol alcohol issues amongst 31-Mar- Gather information on Campaign young people in the area 2014 attitudes and drivers for 31-Oct-2013 and action as appropriate. consumption with young

Milestone Due Action Code & Title Expected Outcome Due Date Milestone Description Date people Establish extent of issue amongst young people and 31-Dec-2013 potential project work to combat this Liaise with Portsmouth Pilot of project and establish 31-Jul-2013 whether barries to Reduction in violent 31-Mar- introduction NTE3 Conditional Cautioning offences. 2014 Development of referrals to Interventions Officer at HDC 30-Sep-2013 linking in with Police Clean Slate programme Evaulate outcome of BDBC 31-Jul-2013 Purple Flag application Positive promotion for NTE 31-Mar- NTE4 Purple Flag Scheme in Safer North Hampshire Use BDBC application as 2014 model if successful and look area, reduction in offences. 30-Sep-2013 at potential for scheme in Rushmoor and Hart. Establish need for greater Greater awareness of education across hard to 31-Jul-2013 SM1 Engage hard to substance misuse issues 31-Mar- reach groups reach/minority groups amongst hard to 2014 Establish programme of reach/minority groups sessions across Safer North 31-Mar-2014 Hampshire area Establish myth busting Greater awareness amongst 31-Mar- programme within lessons, as SM2 Myth Busting young people of dangers of 31-Mar-2014 2014 well as for other agenciees to legal highs. deliver. Map existing provision and 30-Sep-2013 gaps Establish working party 31-Oct-2013 SM3 Social Enterprise Increased opportunities for 31-Mar- Mapping recovering addicts. 2014 Establish new opportunities to better serve recovering 31-Mar-2014 addicts --New Milestone-- Establish working party 31-May-2013 Explore current provision for street drinkers across Safer 30-Jun-2013 Reduction in street drinkers 31-Mar- North Hampshire area SM4 Street Drinkers and greater support for 2014 those who need it. Establish improved response and projects to reduce street 31-Oct-2013 drinking and associated issues