DOCSLIB.ORG

Pac-10 Wrestling

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pac-10 Wrestling PAC-10 WRESTLING PAC-10 TEAM PAC-10 1971 (Pullman, Wash.) 1979 (Eugene, Ore.) 1. Washington ...........91.00 1. Oregon State ..........90.75 CHAMPIONS CHAMPIONSHIP 2. Oregon State ..........70.00 2. Arizona State ..........79.25 1963 WSU 3. UCLA .....................62.00 3. UCLA .....................55.00 1964 UCLA RESULTS 4. Oregon ...................46.00. 4. Oregon ...................47.25 1963 (Los Angeles, Calif.) 1965 OSU 5. Washington State ....31.00 5. Arizona...................39.00 1. Washignton State ....79.00 1966 OSU 6. California ................27.00 6. Washington State ....26.75 2. Washington ............57.00 1967 OSU 7. Stanford .................15.00 7. California ................10.50 3. UCLA .....................50.00 1968 OSU 8. Washington ............4.50 1969 OSU 4. California ................33.00 1972 (Seattle, Wash.) 1970 OSU 5. Stanford .................21.00 1. Oregon State ..........78.50 1980 (Tucson, Ariz.) 1971 WASH Washington ............78.50 1. Arizona State ..........82.25 1972 OSU 1964 (Berkeley, Calif.) 3. Washington State ....50.50 2. Oregon ...................66.75 1973 OSU 1. UCLA .....................64.00 4. Oregon ...................48.50 3. Oregon State ..........54.00 1974 WASH 2. Washington ............63.00 5. California ................41.00 4. UCLA .....................44.50 1975 ORE 3. California ................55.00 6. Stanford .................21.00 5. Arizona...................29.75 1976 OSU 4. Stanford .................50.00 1977 OSU UCLA .....................21.00 6. Washington State ....26.50 5. Washington State ....41.00 1978 OSU 7. Washington ............26.00 1979 OSU 1973 (Corvallis, Ore.) 8. Stanford .................6.25 1965 (Stanford, Calif.) 1980 ASU 1. Oregon State ..........98.50 1. Oregon State ..........103.00 1981 ORE 2. Washington ............84.00 1981 (Corvallis, Ore.) 2. Stanford .................45.00 1982 ORE 3. Oregon ...................59.00 1. Oregon ...................93.50 3. Washington State ....44.00 1983 OSU 4. California ................34.50 2. Oregon State ..........76.50 4. California ................41.00 1984 OSU 5. UCLA .....................31.50 3. Arizona State ..........72.00 Oregon ...................41.00 1985 ASU 6. Washington State ....21.50 4. Arizona...................34.00 6. UCLA .....................33.00 1986 ASU 7. Stanford .................11.00 5. Washington State ....26.50 1987 ASU 7. Washington ............22.00 6. Stanford .................8.00 1988 ASU 1974 (Corvallis, Ore.) 1989 ASU 1966 (Seattle, Wash.) 1. Washington ............123.00 1982 (Stanford, Calif.) 1990 ASU 1. Oregon State ..........108.00 2. Oregon ...................106.00 1. Oregon ...................81.50 1991 ASU 2. Oregon ...................59.00 3. Oregon State ..........102.50 2. Oregon State ..........74.75 1992 OSU 3. UCLA .....................46.00 4. UCLA .....................96.00 3. Arizona State ..........69.75 1993 ASU 4. Washington State ....41.00 5. Washington State ....62.00 4. Washington State ....45.50 1994 OSU 5. California ................32.00 1995 ASU 6. California ................45.50 5. Stanford .................21.25 6. Stanford .................24.00 1996 CSUB 7. Stanford .................1.50 7. Washington ............10.00 1997 ASU 1983 (Corvallis, Ore.) 1998 ASU 1975 (Corvallis, Ore.) 1. Oregon State ..........88.75 1967 (Los Angeles, Calif.) 1999 CSUB 1. Oregon ...................145.00 2. Arizona State ..........81.75 1. Oregon State ..........109.00 2000 Boise State 2. Oregon State ..........104.50 3. Oregon ...................51.00 2. UCLA .....................79.00 2001 ASU 3. UCLA .....................93.50 4. Stanford .................48.50 3. Washington State ....62.00 2002 Boise State 4. Washington ............68.00 5. Washington State ....46.50 4. Washington ............44.00 2003 ASU 5. California ................60.00 5. Stanford .................27.00 2004 Boise State 6. Stanford .................40.50 1984 (Corvallis, Ore.) 2005 ASU 6. Oregon ...................25.00 7. Washington State ....13.50 1. Oregon State ..........98.00 2006 ASU 7. California ................8.00 2. Arizona State ..........94.00 2007 OSU 1976 (Corvallis, Ore.) 3. Washington State ....57.50 2008 Boise State 1968 (Stanford, Calif.) 1. Oregon State ..........79.00 4. Stanford .................33.50 2009 Boise State 1. Oregon State ..........89.00 2. Oregon ...................78.75 5. Oregon ...................21.75 2010 Oregon State 2. UCLA .....................66.00 3. UCLA .....................48.75 3. Washington State ....59.00 4. Washington ............45.25 1985 (Tempe, Ariz.) 4. Oregon ...................57.00 5. California ................38.25 1. Arizona State ..........114.75 5. Stanford .................33.00 6. Washington State ....28.25 2. Oregon ...................69.00 6. California ................30.00 7. Stanford .................11.50 3. Stanford .................58.50 7. Washington State ....23.00 4. Oregon ...................32.00 1977 (Corvallis, Ore.) Washington State ....32.00 1969 (Eugene, Ore.) 1. Oregon State ..........105.5 1. Oregon State ..........99.00 2. Oregon ...................58.75 1986 (Pullman, Wash.) 2. Washington ............50.00 3. Washington ............44.00 1. Arizona State ..........86.50 3. UCLA .....................47.00 4. California ................43.00 2. Oregon State ..........80.50 4. Oregon ...................46.00 5. UCLA .....................36.00 3. Stanford .................46.50 5. Washington State ....40.00 6. Stanford .................17.75 4. Washington State ....45.25 6. Stanford .................21.00 7. Washington State ....10.00 5. Oregon ...................45.00 7. California ................15.00 1978 (Corvallis, Ore.) 1987 (Corvallis, Ore.) 1970 (Corvallis, Ore.) 1. Oregon State ..........101.75 1. Arizona State ..........101.75 1. Oregon State ..........98.00 2. Washington ............60.50 2. Utah State ..............50.25 2. Washington ............57.00 3. UCLA .....................50.75 3. Oregon State ..........47.50 3. Oregon ...................54.00 4. Oregon ...................46.00 4. Fresno State ...........40.25 4. Washington State ....43.00 5. California ................32.00 5. CS Fullerton ...........34.25 5. California ................28.00 6. Washington State ....30.25 6. Cal Poly SLO...........34.00 6. Stanford .................19.00 7. Stanford .................3.50 7. Oregon ...................28.00 7. UCLA .....................16.00 8. San Jose State ........25.50 9. Stanford .................17.00 1 PAC-10 WRESTLING 1988 (Fullerton, Calif.) 1994 (San Luis Obispo, Calif.) 2000 (Davis, Calif.) 2006 (Stanford, Calif.) 1. Arizona State ..........103.00 1. Oregon State ..........128.75 1. Boise State .............133.5 1. Arizona State ..........118.0 2. Oregon ...................47.50 2. CS Bakersfield ........98.25 2. Arizona State ..........125.5 2. Cal Poly ..................115.5 3. Utah State ..............47.00 3. Arizona State ..........93.50 3. Oregon State ..........102.0 3. Boise State .............97.0 4. Cal Poly SLO...........44.75 4. Oregon ...................88.00 4. CS Bakersfield ........101.5 4. Oregon State ..........93.0 5. CS Bakersfield ........39.25 5. Cal Poly SLO...........78.00 5. Oregon ...................72.5 5. Bakersfield .............85.0 6. Fresno State ...........36.25 6. Boise State .............66.25 6. CS Fullerton ...........64.5 6. UC Davis ................78.5 7. Oregon State ..........34.00 7. CS Fullerton ...........64.00 7. Stanford .................40.0 7. Stanford .................54.5 8. Boise State .............26.0 8. Stanford .................36.75 8. Portland State.........38.5 8. Oregon ...................49.0 9. CS Fullerton ...........17.50 9. UC Davis ................22.50 9. Cal Poly ..................28.5 9. Fullerton.................41.5 10. Stanford .................16.50 10. UC Davis ................24.0 10. Portland State.........1.0 11. San Jose State ........6.50 1995 (Corvallis, Ore.) 1. Arizona State ..........126.00 2001 (Eugene, Ore.) 2007 (Bakersfield, Calif.) 1989 (Tempe, Ariz.) 2. Oregon State ..........123.50 1. Arizona State ..........123.50 1. Oregon State ..........110.0 1. Arizona State ..........88.75 3. CS Bakersfield ........108.00 2. Boise State .............110.50 2. CS Bakersfield ........105.0 2. Oregon ..................70.50 4. Oregon ...................91.50 3. Oregon State ..........109.50 3. UC Davis ................96.5 3. Boise State .............45.00 5. Stanford .................84.00 4. Oregon ...................103.50 4. Cal Poly ..................84.0 4. Cal Poly SLO...........42.75 6. Cal Poly SLO...........79.50 5. Cal Poly ..................80.50 5. Arizona State ..........76.5 5. CS Bakersfield ........41.00 7. Boise State .............74.00 6. CS Bakersfield ........70.00 6. Stanford .................72.0 6. CS Fullerton ...........35.50 8. CS Fullerton ...........26.50 7. UC Davis ................60.00 7. CS Fullerton ...........69.5 7. Fresno State ...........30.75 9. UC Davis ................7.00 8. Portland State.........48.50 8. Oregon ...................62.0 8. Oregon State ..........19.75 9. Stanford .................19.00 9. Boise State .............58.5 9. Stanford .................14.00 1996 (Bakersfield, Calif.) 10. CS Fullerton ...........15.50 10. Portland State.........5.5 10. Utah State ..............10.50 1. CS Bakersfield ........155.00 2. Arizona State ..........138.50 2002 (Corvallis, Ore.) 2008 (Eugene, Ore.) 1990 (Bakersfield,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2005 75Th NCAA Wrestling Tournament 3/17/2005 to 3/19/2005
    75th NCAA Wrestling Tournament 2005 3/17/2005 to 3/19/2005 at St. Louis Team Champion Oklahoma State - 153 Points Outstanding Wrestler: Greg Jones - West Virginia Gorriaran Award: Evan Sola - North Carolina Top Ten Team Scores Number of Individual Champs in parentheses. 1 Oklahoma State 153 (5) 6 Illinois 70.5 2 Michigan 83 (1) 7 Iowa 66 3 Oklahoma 77.5 (1) 8 Lehigh 60 4 Cornell 76.5 (1) 9 Indiana 58.5 (1) 5 Minnesota 72.5 10 Iowa State 57 Champions and Place Winners Wrestler's seed in brackets, [US] indicates unseeeded. 1251st: Joe Dubuque [5] - Indiana (2-0) 2nd: Kyle Ott [3] - Illinois 3rd: Sam Hazewinkel [1] - Oklahoma (6-3) 4th: Nick Simmons [2] - Michigan State 5th: Efren Ceballos [6] - Cal State-Bakersfield (3-2) 6th: Vic Moreno [4] - Cal Poly-SLO 7th: Bobbe Lowe [8] - Minnesota (7-3) 8th: Coleman Scott [9] - Oklahoma State 1331st: Travis Lee [1] - Cornell (6-3) 2nd: Shawn Bunch [2] - Edinboro 3rd: Tom Clum [5] - Wisconsin (2-1) 4th: Mack Reiter [3] - Minnesota 5th: Matt Sanchez [10] - Cal State-Bakersfield (10-5) 6th: Evan Sola [11] - North Carolina 7th: Mark Jayne [4] - Illinois (5-3) 8th: Drew Headlee [US] - Pittsburgh 1411st: Teyon Ware [2] - Oklahoma (3-2) 2nd: Nate Gallick [1] - Iowa State 3rd: Cory Cooperman [4] - Lehigh (10-1) 4th: Daniel Frishkorn [7] - Oklahoma State 5th: Michael Keefe [11] - Tennessee-Chattanooga (Med FFT) 6th: Andy Simmons [5] - Michigan State 7th: Casio Pero [12] - Illinois (6-5 TB1) 8th: Josh Churella [3] - Michigan 1491st: Zack Esposito [1] - Oklahoma State (5-2) 2nd: Phillip Simpson [2] - Army 3rd:
    [Show full text]
  • Cultivating Identity and the Music of Ultimate Fighting
    CULIVATING IDENTITY AND THE MUSIC OF ULTIMATE FIGHTING Luke R Davis A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF MUSIC August 2012 Committee: Megan Rancier, Advisor Kara Attrep © 2012 Luke R Davis All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Megan Rancier, Advisor In this project, I studied the music used in Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) events and connect it to greater themes and aspects of social study. By examining the events of the UFC and how music is used, I focussed primarily on three issues that create a multi-layered understanding of Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) fighters and the cultivation of identity. First, I examined ideas of identity formation and cultivation. Since each fighter in UFC events enters his fight to a specific, and self-chosen, musical piece, different aspects of identity including race, political views, gender ideologies, and class are outwardly projected to fans and other fighters with the choice of entrance music. This type of musical representation of identity has been discussed (although not always in relation to sports) in works by past scholars (Kun, 2005; Hamera, 2005; Garrett, 2008; Burton, 2010; Mcleod, 2011). Second, after establishing a deeper sense of socio-cultural fighter identity through entrance music, this project examined ideas of nationalism within the UFC. Although traces of nationalism fall within the purview of entrance music and identity, the UFC aids in the nationalistic representations of their fighters by utilizing different tactics of marketing and fighter branding. Lastly, this project built upon the above- mentioned issues of identity and nationality to appropriately discuss aspects of how the UFC attempts to depict fighter character to create a “good vs.
    [Show full text]
  • FATHOM EVENTS and UFC® BRING SOLD-OUT UFC® 180: VELASQUEZ Vs
    FATHOM EVENTS AND UFC® BRING SOLD-OUT UFC® 180: VELASQUEZ vs. WERDUM TO U.S. CINEMAS LIVE FROM MEXICO CITY ON NOV. 15 DENVER, CO – UFC® returns to movie theaters nationwide on Sat., Nov. 15 at 10:00 p.m. ET / 7:00 p.m. PT, as Fathom Events and UFC bring UFC® 180: VELASQUEZ vs. WERDUM, the UFC’s first-ever event in Mexico, to the big screen. Fans will have a front-row Octagon® view of all the action when heavyweight champion Cain Velasquez collides with no.1 contender Fabricio Werdum in the five-round main event on Nov. 15. Broadcast live from the sold-out Arena Ciudad de México in Mexico City, audiences will witness the culmination of 12 weeks of rivalry and competition built up between these two heavyweight coaches on The Ultimate Fighter® Latin America, the UFC’s famed reality television series. Tickets to watch UFC® 180: VELASQUEZ vs. WERDUM on the big screen are available at participating theater box offices and at www.FathomEvents.com. The event will be presented in more than 400 select movie theaters around the country through Fathom’s Digital Broadcast Network. For a complete list of theater locations and prices, visit the Fathom Events website (theaters and participants are subject to change). “UFC 180 is a historic event and fans in theaters nationwide will be treated to the ultimate, front-row Octagon experience as Velasquez and Werdum battle for the title on the big screen,” said Dan Diamond, senior vice president of Fathom Events. UFC heavyweight champion Cain Velasquez (13-1 in his professional career, fighting out of San Jose, Calif.), an agile and explosive heavyweight with a strong wrestling base, is currently the only heavyweight titleholder of Mexican descent in combat sports around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Dos Santos Has a Chance to Grow, Develop from Loss
    dos Santos has a chance to grow, develop from loss Author : Robert D. Cobb Former UFC heavyweight champion Junior dos Santos learned a lot in his title fight with Cain Velasquez at UFC 155. I hope dos Santos paid attention because Velasquez put the blueprint to regaining his title right in front of him. Velasquez dominated from start to finish -- he won every round convincingly. Dos Santos learned he needs to become a better all-around fighter -- Velasquez is a better grappler, wrestler and, Saturday, was a better striker. Velasquez was able to mix up his strikes to take dos Santos down at will. The latter was the most-surprising; until this fight, dos Santos was widely-regarded as the best striker in the division. He has 10 victories by TKO or KO. Simply put, Velasquez proved himself the better fighter by showing more diversity in his game. Against most heavyweight fighters dos Santos doesn't need to be great at more than one aspect of the cage but against top-level fighters, heavy hands aren't always enough. He became champion without becoming a great wrestler -- partly because the depth of skill set at heavyweight is not as good as other divisions and partly because his striking is so dynamic. He showed that in the first fight with Velasquez, when he knocked him out early in the first round. 1 / 2 In a bout with talented submission artist Frank Mir and a separate fight with Roy Nelson, dos Santos stalked them around the ring with his fists. This time, Velasquez did the stalking.
    [Show full text]
  • MMA RANKING Last Updated Friday, 27 November 2009 14:55
    MMA RANKING Last Updated Friday, 27 November 2009 14:55 MMA RANKINGS Heavyweight Last update: November 19, 2009 Read more here: bloodyelbow.com Rank Fighter % Promotion Last Rank 1 Fedor Emelianenko 100 M-1 Global/Strikeforce 1 2 Brock Lesnar 96 UFC 2 3 Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira88 UFC 3 4 Frank Mir 86 UFC 4 5 Junior dos Santos 74 UFC 7 6 Josh Barnett 74 WVR 5 7 Cain Velasquez 67 UFC 11 8 Brett Rogers 65 Strikeforce 8 9 Shane Carwin 62 UFC 6 10 Fabricio Werdum 50 Strikeforce 13 11 Alistair Overeem 50 DREAM/Strikeforce 11 12 Randy Couture 49 UFC 9 13 Andrei Arlovski 44 ??? 10 14 Jeff Monson 27 Free Agent 14 15 Tim Sylvia 26 Adrenaline 18 16 Gabriel Gonzaga 24 UFC 15 17 Cheick Kongo 23 UFC 16 18 Antonio Silva 22 WVR/Strikeforce 22 19 Pedro Rizzo 21 Free Agent 19 19 Marcio Cruz 21 Art of Fighting 23 21 Ben Rothwell 21 UFC 17 22 Gilbert Yvel 20 Fight Force International24 22 Ray Mercer 20 Adrenaline 26 22 Semmy Schilt 20 K-1 24 25 Aleksander Emelianenko19 ProFC 20 25 Roy Nelson 19 UFC 21 Rankings compiled by Richard Wade. 1 / 3 MMA RANKING Last Updated Friday, 27 November 2009 14:55 November was supposed to be the most epic month in heavyweight MMA since August. Both #1 Fedor Emelianenko and #2 Brock Lesnar were set to fight. But just as in August, fate intervened and only one of the two titans of the division actually competed. In August it was the failure of #6 Josh Barnett to meet the licensing requirements of the CSAC and the resulting collapse of Affliction as a fight promotion that prevented Fedor from fighting.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPLAINT 25 V
    Case5:14-cv-05484 Document1 Filed12/16/14 Page1 of 63 1 Joseph R. Saveri (State Bar No. 130064) Joshua P. Davis (State Bar No. 193254) 2 Andrew M. Purdy (State Bar No. 261912) Kevin E. Rayhill (State Bar No. 267496) 3 JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM, INC. 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 625 4 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 500-6800 5 Facsimile: (415) 395-9940 [email protected] 6 [email protected] [email protected] 7 [email protected] 8 Benjamin D. Brown (State Bar No. 202545) Hiba Hafiz (pro hac vice pending) 9 COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL, PLLC 1100 New York Ave., N.W., Suite 500, East Tower 10 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 408-4600 11 Facsimile: (202) 408 4699 [email protected] 12 [email protected] 13 Eric L. Cramer (pro hac vice pending) Michael Dell’Angelo (pro hac vice pending) 14 BERGER & MONTAGUE, P.C. 1622 Locust Street 15 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: (215) 875-3000 16 Facsimile: (215) 875-4604 [email protected] 17 [email protected] 18 Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiffs Cung Le, Nathan Quarry, and Jon Fitch 19 [Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page] 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 21 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 22 Cung Le, Nathan Quarry, Jon Fitch, on behalf of Case No. 23 themselves and all others similarly situated, 24 Plaintiffs, ANTITRUST CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 25 v. 26 Zuffa, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Championship and UFC, 27 Defendant. 28 30 Case No. 31 ANTITRUST CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 32 Case5:14-cv-05484 Document1 Filed12/16/14 Page2 of 63 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 3 I.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 UFC Select Checklist
    2021 Select UFC Checklist - By Fighter Fighter Set Card # Team Print Run Al Iaquinta Auto - Octagon Action Sigs + Parallels 24 Lightweight 185 Aleksandar Rakic Base - Concourse 6 Light Heavyweight Aleksandar Rakic Base - Octagonside 226 Light Heavyweight Aleksandar Rakic Base - Premier Level 153 Light Heavyweight Alexander Gustafsson Auto - Octagon Action Sigs + Parallels 25 Heavyweight 285 Alexander Gustafsson Insert - Global Icons 23 Heavyweight Alexander Volkanovski Auto - Signatures + Parallels 40 Featherweight 135 Alexander Volkanovski Base - Concourse 16 Featherweight Alexander Volkanovski Base - Octagonside 246 Featherweight Alexander Volkanovski Base - Premier Level 155 Featherweight Alexander Volkanovski Insert - Global Icons 9 Featherweight Alexander Volkanovski Insert - Phenomenon 21 Featherweight Alexander Volkov Base - Concourse 26 Heavyweight Alexander Volkov Base - Octagonside 266 Heavyweight Alexander Volkov Base - Premier Level 157 Heavyweight Aljamain Sterling Base - Concourse 46 Bantamweight Aljamain Sterling Base - Octagonside 206 Bantamweight Aljamain Sterling Base - Premier Level 151 Bantamweight Aljamain Sterling Insert - Select Grapplers 15 Bantamweight Amanda Nunes Insert - Select Strikers 13 Women's Bantamweight Amanda Nunes Auto - Signatures + Parallels 16 Women's Featherweight 135 Amanda Nunes Base - Concourse 56 Women's Featherweight Amanda Nunes Base - Octagonside 216 Women's Featherweight Amanda Nunes Base - Premier Level 152 Women's Featherweight Amanda Nunes Insert - Global Icons 17 Women's Featherweight
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 PAC-10 Championships Bout-By-Bout Report
    2006 PAC-10 Championships Bout-By-Bout Results Wt125 Championship First Round 1 #1 Jeremy Mendoza (Arizona State University) WBF Bricen Yakabe (Portland State University) F 2:56 2 Zach Bigboy (California State-Bakersfield) DEC Marcos Orozco (University of California-Davis) D 8-2 Championship Quarter-Finals 17 #1 Jeremy Mendoza (Arizona State University) WBF Curtis Schurkamp (California State-Fullerton) F 2:40 18 #4 Tanner Gardner (Stanford University) DEC #5 Beau Malia (University of Oregon) M 13-0 19 #3 Eric Stevenson (Oregon State University) DEC #6 Cory Fish (Boise State University) D 6-3 20 #2 Chad Mendes (Cal Poly) DEC Zach Bigboy (California State-Bakersfield) M 14-4 Wrestleback Second Round 57 Zach Bigboy (California State-Bakersfield) WBF Bricen Yakabe (Portland State University) F 3:48 58 Marcos Orozco (University of California-Davis) DEC Curtis Schurkamp (California State-Fullerton) D 8-6 Championship Semi-Finals 73 #4 Tanner Gardner (Stanford University) DEC #1 Jeremy Mendoza (Arizona State University) D 6-2 74 #2 Chad Mendes (Cal Poly) WBF #3 Eric Stevenson (Oregon State University) F 0:51 Wrestleback Quarter-Finals 75 #6 Cory Fish (Boise State University) DEC Zach Bigboy (California State-Bakersfield) D 5-0 76 Marcos Orozco (University of California-Davis) WBF #5 Beau Malia (University of Oregon) F 0:29 Wrestleback Semi-Finals 113 #1 Jeremy Mendoza (Arizona State University) WBTF #6 Cory Fish (Boise State University) T1 17-1; 7:0 114 #3 Eric Stevenson (Oregon State University) WBF Marcos Orozco (University of California-Davis)
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona State Wrestling
    2016-17 ARIZONA STATE WRESTLING Tanner Hall | So. | HWT TEAM INFORMATION GUIDE Sun Devil Wrestling Zahid Valencia | RFr. | 174 Oliver Pierce | So. | 157 2 Roster/Schedule Sun Devil Wrestling 2016-17 Roster 2016-17 Schedule Name Ht/Wt Yr Hometown Date Opponent Location Time Anthony Anderson 5-10/174 RSo. Irvine, CA Oct. 28 M&G Prelims Wrestling Room 4:30 pm Sullivan Cauley 6-3/197 RSo. Reno, NV Oct. 29 M&G Final Wells Fargo 7:00 pm Cory Crooks 5-9/141 Fr. Anthem, AZ Nov. 4 N. Colorado Greeley, CO 7:00 pm Jack Duval 5-10/157 Fr. Southlake, TX Nov. 6 Daktronics Open Brookings, SD All Day Andy Gandara 5-11/141 So. Somerton, AZ Nov. 13 Journeyman Troy, NY All Day Tanner Hall 6-3/285 So. Meridian, ID Nov. 13 Bearcat Open Binghamton, NY All Day Austyn Harris 6-2/285 RSo. Broomfield, CO Nov. 19 Ohio State Wells Fargo 1:00 pm Chance Ikei 5-6/133 Fr. Scottsdale, AZ Dec. 2 Cliff Keen Invite Las Vegas, NV All Day Josh Kramer 5-6/125 RFr. Buckeye, AZ Dec. 3 Cliff Keen Invite Las Vegas, NV All Day Josh Maruca 5-11/149 RFr. Murrysville, PA Dec. 29 Midlands Evanston, IL All Day Robbie Mathers 5-7/141 Jr. Ahwatukee, AZ Dec. 30 Midlands Evanston, IL All Day Ryan Nantuna 5-7/149 Sr. Elk Grove, CA Jan. 6 Iowa State Ames, IA TBA Ali Naser 5-8/133 Jr. Woodland Hills, CA Jan. 8 Cal Poly*$ Wells Fargo 2:00 pm Michael Nguyen 5-5/125 Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Demand for the Ultimate Fighting Championship: an Econometric
    Journal of Business and Economics, ISSN 2155-7950, USA June 2015, Volume 6, No. 6, pp. 1032-1056 DOI: 10.15341/jbe(2155-7950)/06.06.2015/002 © Academic Star Publishing Company, 2015 http://www.academicstar.us Demand for the Ultimate Fighting Championship: An Econometric Analysis of PPV Buy Rates Richard A. McGowan1, John F. Mahon2 (1. Boston College, MA 02467, USA; 2.University of Maine, ME 04469-5723, USA) Abstract: This study provides a framework by which the UFC can analyze the determinants of its PPV buy rates, a form of direct demand for the UFC. Accurately deriving demand is incredibly important in the UFC’s goal to maximize revenue and further grow the sport and equally as important for promoters, TV and cable networks. Given that the endogenous growth of the UFC has slowed greatly, specific event characteristics have emerged as the primary factors that govern the buy rate. Using a combination of empirical regression analysis and industry expertise, the UFC and promoters and others can more accurately estimate the buy rates of upcoming events. Key words: gaming; sports; econometric analysis JEL codes: C1, M1 In the past fifteen years, the sport of mixed martial arts has grown from no-rules, bareknuckle “human cockfighting” into a highly professional and incredibly popular mainstream sport with millions of fans around the world. Since purchasing its biggest rival in 2007, the Las Vegas-based Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) has been undisputedly the largest, best quality and most popular MMA promotion in the world. In 2008, Forbes wrote an article calling it the “Ultimate Cash Machine”, valuing it at $1 billion (Miller Matthew, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 WWE Transcendent
    BASE ROSTER BASE CARD 1 Adam Cole NXT 2 Andre the Giant WWE Legend 3 Angelo Dawkins WWE 4 Bianca Belair NXT 5 Big Show WWE 6 Bruno Sammartino WWE Legend 7 Cain Velasquez WWE 8 Cameron Grimes WWE 9 Candice LeRae NXT 10 Chyna WWE Legend 11 Damian Priest NXT 12 Dusty Rhodes WWE Legend 13 Eddie Guerrero WWE Legend 14 Harley Race WWE Legend 15 Hulk Hogan WWE Legend 16 Io Shirai NXT 17 Jim "The Anvil" Neidhart WWE Legend 18 John Cena WWE 19 John Morrison WWE 20 Johnny Gargano WWE 21 Keith Lee NXT 22 Kevin Nash WWE Legend 23 Lana WWE 24 Lio Rush WWE 25 "Macho Man" Randy Savage WWE Legend 26 Mandy Rose WWE 27 "Mr. Perfect" Curt Hennig WWE Legend 28 Montez Ford WWE 29 Mustafa Ali WWE 30 Naomi WWE 31 Natalya WWE 32 Nikki Cross WWE 33 Paul Heyman WWE 34 "Ravishing" Rick Rude WWE Legend 35 Renee Young WWE 36 Rhea Ripley NXT 37 Robert Roode WWE 38 Roderick Strong NXT 39 "Rowdy" Roddy Piper WWE Legend 40 Rusev WWE 41 Scott Hall WWE Legend 42 Shorty G WWE 43 Sting WWE Legend 44 Sonya Deville WWE 45 The British Bulldog WWE Legend 46 The Rock WWE Legend 47 Ultimate Warrior WWE Legend 48 Undertaker WWE 49 Vader WWE Legend 50 Yokozuna WWE Legend AUTOGRAPH ROSTER AUTOGRAPHS A-AA Andrade WWE A-AB Aleister Black WWE A-AJ AJ Styles WWE A-AK Asuka WWE A-AX Alexa Bliss WWE A-BC King Corbin WWE A-BD Diesel WWE Legend A-BH Bret "Hit Man" Hart WWE Legend A-BI Brock Lesnar WWE A-BL Becky Lynch WWE A-BR Braun Strowman WWE A-BT Booker T WWE Legend A-BW "The Fiend" Bray Wyatt WWE A-BY Bayley WWE A-CF Charlotte Flair WWE A-CW Sheamus WWE A-DB Daniel Bryan WWE A-DR Drew
    [Show full text]
  • Mixed Martial Arts 1 Mixed Martial Arts
    Mixed martial arts 1 Mixed martial arts Mixed Martial Arts Patrick Barry (Blue shorts) and Mirko Filipović (Checkered shorts) in the co-main event of UFC 115 in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Also known as Vale Tudo, No Holds Barred (NHB), Cage Fighting, Ultimate Fighting, Pride Fighting, Sougo Kakutogi Focus Various Hardness Full contact Olympic sport No Mixed martial arts (MMA), popularly known as cage fighting or ultimate fighting is a full contact combat sport that allows a wide variety of fighting techniques and skills, from a mixture of other combat sports, to be used in competitions. The rules allow the use of both striking as well as grappling techniques, both while standing and while on the ground. Such competitions allow fighters of different backgrounds to compete. The roots of modern mixed martial arts can be traced back to various mixed style contests that took place throughout Europe, Japan and the Pacific Rim during the early 1900s. The combat sport of Vale Tudo that had developed in Brazil from the 1920s was brought to the United States by the Gracie family in 1993 with the founding of the Ultimate Fighting Championship. Professional MMA events had also been held in Japan by Shooto starting back in 1989. In due course the more dangerous Vale Tudo style bouts of the early UFCs were made safer with the implementation of additional rules, leading to the popular regulated form of MMA seen today. Originally promoted as a competition with the intention of finding the most effective martial arts for real unarmed combat situations,
    [Show full text]