DOCSLIB.ORG

Showcase Your Company at the Annual Convergence of Industry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Showcase Your Company at the Annual Convergence of Industry Sponsorship/Exhibit Prospectus Showcase Your Company at the Annual Convergence of Industry Leaders in Commercial Cryptography Almost 400 commercial cryptography professionals from 25 countries came together last May for the International Cryptographic Module Conference—the industry’s leading forum for data security based in commercial encryption. For 2020, Reserve we’re building on that success with additional events and up-to-the-minute sessions and content and we’re continuing our in- depth coverage of cryptographic policies, standards, technologies, implementation, and markets. Reserve your place now at Your Space this gathering of professionals who develop, test, certify, specify, procure, and rely on these technologies. Today standards such as FIPS 140-3, ISO/IEC Nine Tracks Cover the Industry 19790, eEIDAS, and Common Criteria. The conference at ICMC includes ICMC reviews technical issues over 90 presentations in nine tracks: underlying cryptographic April 28-May 1 implementation including physical General Technology: Hyatt Regency Tools and techniques relating to security, key management, side- Bethesda, Maryland, USA cryptographic modules The coming year will see widespread channel analysis, open-source changes in commercial cryptography: development, algorithm testing, Advanced Technology: The highly-anticipated FIPS 140-3 quantum threats, embedded High-level technology issues, or special-focus subject matter standard for cryptographic modules applications, standardization, validation becomes effective in late 2020. At the programs, government policy, same time, European regulators are professional ethics, and more.. Certification Programs: Issues related to the CMVP, moving forward with independent government programs and global A Unique Promotion Opportunity certification cryptographic standards. Interest in open source solutions has greatly Promotion opportunities are available End-User Experience: expanded. And legacy systems are for leading companies offering CM products, certifications, and vulnerabilities for organizations that under a growing threat as the need for products, technologies and services in rely on crypto security quantum-resistant algorithms increases this evolving field. It’s a unique opportunity to showcase your company Open-Source Cryptography: each year. In the face of these and other Efforts to audit, improve and certify changes, hundreds of cryptographic to an engaged and highly responsive the security of OS crypto projects professionals will reconvene in audience. The event features an Washington DC for ICMC20. The efficient three-day participation format Industry Vertical/Embedded conference will survey the new FIPS that respects your busy schedule. Crypto: The application of embedded encryption in specific 140-3 standard, discuss the effect on industry verticals With Easy Access to current certifications, and report on the Quantum-Ready Crypto: progress of the Automated Metro DC The quantum computing threat and Cryptographic Validation Program. efforts to transition to quantum-safe The Hyatt Regency is algorithms Three days of presentations will survey located above the Red the open source cryptographic metro line, offering Random Bit Generators: Issues related to the design and protocols that power the Internet and easy access to validation of entropy sources and the cutting-edge post-quantum crypto landmarks, museums, random bit generators Located in Bethesda, Maryland with work that will insure future security. At restaurants and shops access to the best of the DC area. PCI ICMC20 over 400 industry leaders throughout the Updates on Payment Card Industry SW and HW crypto security from 27 countries will come together to Washington, DC area. standardsIincluding PCI-PTS, PCI- address the unique challenges faced by Over 600 restaurants, boutiques, and SPoC those who develop, produce, test, shops are within walking distance. specify, and use cryptographic modules, with a strong focus on www.ICMConference.org Three Days of Comprehensive, Independent, Peer-Reviewed Industry Information Founded on Global Standards and Certification ICMC participants are drawn to ICMC19 Participating Countries Convenient Two-Day Exhibit Schedule Participating Organizations “My favorite bits are the networking, the highly-rated conference Acumen Security • Advanced Data Security, LLC • AEGISOLVE • Over seven hours of Aerospace Corporation • Akamai Technologies / OpenSSL • meetings with presentations. Previous topics: dedicated break, lunch, Allegro Software• Angelus Consulting Group Inc. • Apple Inc. • partners, labs, Plenary Sessions: CMUF Update Digital Disruption and the Implications for Apricorn • Aruba Networks • Aruba, a Hewlett Packard consultants. I also Cybersecurity and Cryptography • What’s Next for Cryptography? • How CSE and reception time takes Enterprise company • Assured Crypto Inc. • atsec Information learned a lot!” Balances Privacy and Innovation in the Public and Private Sectors • Can Australia • Belgium • Canada • China • Security Corp. • AWS • BAE Systems AI • BaishanCloud • Booz Certification Keep Up With the Pace of Modern Development? Advanced Croatia • Czech Republic • France • Technology: Lightweight Post-Quantum Crypto: An Oxymoron • Permutation- place in the exhibit area. Allen Hamilton • Brightsight • Brocade Communications • CA based cryptography • Sizing Up the Threshold: Challenges and Opportunities Germany • Israel • Italy • Japan • Mexico • Technologies • Canonical • Catalone IT Security Inc. • Certified in the Standardization of Threshold Schemes for Cryptographic Primitives Netherlands • Portugal • South Korea • Spain Monday, April 27 InfoSec Conference • CGI • Check Point Software Technologies • The Future of HSMs and New Technology for Hardware Based Security • Sweden • Switzerland • Taiwan • Turkey • Lab Managers Meeting • Chinese Academy of Sciences • CIENA • Cisco Systems, Inc. • Solutions • The Future of HSMs and New Technology for Hardware Based Ukraine • United Arab Emirates • United CNXTD Event Media Services • COACT • Communication Security Solutions • The Future of HSMs and New Technology for Hardware Kingdom • United States Security Establishment • Corsec • Crypotsoft • Crypto Based Security Solutions • The Future of HSMs and New Technology for Tuesday, April 28 Hardware Based Security Solutions Certification Programs: Certification Workshop/Legion of the Bouncy Castle • Crypto4A • Track Keynote: Increasing the Value of Certifications to the End-User •CMVP Uniting the Industry Value Chain Lab Manager’s Meeting (Cont’d) Cryptomathic Inc. • Cryptsoft Pty Ltd • Crystal Group • CSC (a Programmatic Update • NIAP Update •Panel Presentation: Update on the Who Attends: ICMC brings together DXC.TEchnology company) • CygnaCom Solutions • Dark Matter Automated Cryptographic Validation Program (ACVP) • Mandating CMVP for professionals involved with data security 08:00 Registration • DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. • Dell • Department of NIAP Evaluations Panel Presentation • NIST and NIAP Working Together • based in commercial encryption, especially 09:00 Pre-Conference Workshops Nation Defence (Canada) • DNV GL• DXC Technology • ECSEC Revalidation in response to CVE Working Group •Touch the Cloud: Closing the Laboratory Inc. • Electronics and Telecommunications Research FIPS Validation Gap • Panel Discussion: ACVP—How It Will Change the Way those who develop, manufacture, test, 12:30 Lunch You Work • ACVP Client Integration for FIPS Algorithm Testing and Runtime specify or use certified commercial off the Institute(ETRI) • Entrust Datacard • Envieta Systems LLC • Crypto Assessment • Realigning (Not Re-inventing!) the Wheel: Applying a shelf hardware, software, and hybrid 13:30 Pre-Conference Workshops Epoche and Espri (a Dekra company) • ETRI • evolutionQ Inc • Composition Model to FIPS 140-2 Validation • In FIPS 140-2 Validations, Why cryptographic modules. Key participants EWA Canada • EYL Inc. • F5 Networks, Inc • FAU and So Much Redundant Data Redundancy in FIPS 140-2 Validations? • Your include laboratories and government Wednesday, April 29 PQSecure Technologies • FMV • Fornetix • G+D Mobile Security Creative Solutions • O-TTPS Certification as a Companion to CMVP and departments responsible for testing • Galois • Gemalto • George Mason University • Gossamer Common Criteria • CAVP/CMVP Requirements from 800-90B • IG Updates: 08:00 Registration Security Solutions, Inc. • Government of Canada • Grupo Salinas Chasing the Moving • TOO MANY CERTIFICATIONS! Industry cryptographic modules; stakeholders in Vertical/Embedded Crypto: Industry Vertical/Embedded Crypto Track standards development; leading members of 09:00 Plenary Keynotes • Hewlett Packard Company • HP Inc. • HST Systems and Keynote: Embedded Encryption and Blockchain Technologies for IoT Security the academic community; embedded 10:30 Networking Break, Exhibits Technology INC • Huawei Technologies • IBM • IBM Research • •"FIPS 140-2 Inside" - You're (probably) doing it wrong •IoT Security - GAME Icon Security • ID Quantique • IDEMIA • Independent Consultant systems OEMs; and the side channel Open OF TRUST •FIPS, IoT Medical Devices and the DoD/VA•FIPS 140-2 research community. Participating federal • Information Systems Security Bureau • Information Technology Perspectives on IoT Devices in a Blockchain Setting •Secrets of Crypto agencies include CSEC, NIST, NIAP, NSA, 11:15 Conference Tracks Security Center • Information-technology Promotion Agency, Technology Revealed for Enhanced ICS Cybersecurity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ten Strategies of a World-Class Cybersecurity Operations Center Conveys MITRE’S Expertise on Accumulated Expertise on Enterprise-Grade Computer Network Defense
    Bleed rule--remove from file Bleed rule--remove from file MITRE’s accumulated Ten Strategies of a World-Class Cybersecurity Operations Center conveys MITRE’s expertise on accumulated expertise on enterprise-grade computer network defense. It covers ten key qualities enterprise- grade of leading Cybersecurity Operations Centers (CSOCs), ranging from their structure and organization, computer MITRE network to processes that best enable effective and efficient operations, to approaches that extract maximum defense Ten Strategies of a World-Class value from CSOC technology investments. This book offers perspective and context for key decision Cybersecurity Operations Center points in structuring a CSOC and shows how to: • Find the right size and structure for the CSOC team Cybersecurity Operations Center a World-Class of Strategies Ten The MITRE Corporation is • Achieve effective placement within a larger organization that a not-for-profit organization enables CSOC operations that operates federally funded • Attract, retain, and grow the right staff and skills research and development • Prepare the CSOC team, technologies, and processes for agile, centers (FFRDCs). FFRDCs threat-based response are unique organizations that • Architect for large-scale data collection and analysis with a assist the U.S. government with limited budget scientific research and analysis, • Prioritize sensor placement and data feed choices across development and acquisition, enteprise systems, enclaves, networks, and perimeters and systems engineering and integration. We’re proud to have If you manage, work in, or are standing up a CSOC, this book is for you. served the public interest for It is also available on MITRE’s website, www.mitre.org. more than 50 years.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Study of Cache Side Channels Across AES Implementations
    A Systematic Study of Cache Side Channels across AES Implementations Heiko Mantel1, Alexandra Weber1, and Boris K¨opf 2 1 Computer Science Department, TU Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany [email protected], [email protected] 2 IMDEA Software Institute, Madrid, Spain [email protected] Abstract While the AES algorithm is regarded as secure, many imple- mentations of AES are prone to cache side-channel attacks. The lookup tables traditionally used in AES implementations for storing precom- puted results provide speedup for encryption and decryption. How such lookup tables are used is known to affect the vulnerability to side chan- nels, but the concrete effects in actual AES implementations are not yet sufficiently well understood. In this article, we analyze and compare multiple off-the-shelf AES implementations wrt. their vulnerability to cache side-channel attacks. By applying quantitative program analysis techniques in a systematic fashion, we shed light on the influence of im- plementation techniques for AES on cache-side-channel leakage bounds. 1 Introduction The Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) is a widely used symmetric cipher that is approved by the U.S. National Security Agency for security-critical ap- plications [8]. While traditional attacks against AES are considered infeasible as of today, software implementations of AES are known to be highly suscepti- ble to cache side-channel attacks [5, 15, 18, 19, 32]. While such side channels can be avoided by bitsliced implementations [6,23], lookup-table-based implementa- tions, which aim at better performance, are often vulnerable and wide spread. To understand the vulnerability to cache side-channel attacks, recall that the 128bit version of AES relies on 10 rounds of transformations.
    [Show full text]
  • The BEAST Wins Again: Why TLS Keeps Failing to Protect HTTP Antoine Delignat-Lavaud, Inria Paris Joint Work with K
    The BEAST Wins Again: Why TLS Keeps Failing to Protect HTTP Antoine Delignat-Lavaud, Inria Paris Joint work with K. Bhargavan, C. Fournet, A. Pionti, P.-Y. Strub INTRODUCTION Introduction Cookie Cutter Virtual Host Confusion Crossing Origin Boundaries Shared Session Cache Shared Reverse Proxies SPDY Connection Pooling Triple Handshake Conclusion Why do we need TLS? 1. Authentication – Must be talking to the right guy 2. Integrity – Our messages cannot be tampered 3. Confidentiality – Messages are only legible to participants 4. Privacy? – Can’t tell who we are and what we talk about Why do we need TLS? 1. Authentication – Must be talking to the right guy Active Attacks 2. Integrity (MitM) – Our messages cannot be tampered 3. Confidentiality – Messages are only legible to participants Passive Attacks 4. Privacy? (Wiretapping) – Can’t tell who we are and what we talk about What websites expect of TLS • Web attacker – Controls malicious websites – User visits honest and malicious sites in parallel – Web/MitB attacks: CSRF, XSS, Redirection… • Network attacker – Captures (passive) and tampers (active) packets What websites expect of TLS • Web attacker – Controls malicious websites – User visits honest and malicious sites in parallel – Web/MitB attacks: CSRF, XSS, Redirection… • Network attacker Strictly stronger – Captures (passive) and tampers (active) packets What websites expect of TLS If a website W served over HTTP is secure against a Web attacker, then serving W over HTTPS makes it secure against a network attacker. What websites expect of TLS If a website W served over HTTP is secure against a Web attacker, then serving W over HTTPS makes it secure against a network attacker.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Trust
    SEARCHing for Trust Scott Rea1, TBA GOV2, TBA EDU3 1DigiCert Inc, Lindon, UT U.S.A., [email protected] 2Gov Agency, TBA, Australia, [email protected] 3University or Corporation, TBA, Australia, [email protected] ABSTRACT The security of the X.509 “oligarchy” Public Key Infrastructure for browsers and SSL web servers is under scrutiny in response to Certification Authority (CA) compromises which resulted in the circulation of fraudulent certificates. These rogue certificates can and have been used to execute Man-in-the-Middle attacks and gain access to users’ sensitive information. In wake of these events, there has been a call for change to the extent of either securing the current system or altogether replacing it with an alternative design. This panel will review the results of the research paper to be published that will explore the following proposals which have been put forth to replace or improve the CA system with the goal of aiding in the prevention and detection of MITM attacks and improving the trust infrastructure: Convergence, Perspectives, Mutually Endorsed Certification Authority Infrastructure (MECAI), DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE), DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Records, Public Key Pinning, Sovereign Keys, and Certificate Transparency. In the paper, a new metric is described that ranks each proposal according to a set of well-identified criteria and gives readers an idea of the costs and benefits of implementing the proposed system and the potential strengths and weaknesses of the design. The results of the research and the corresponding impacts for eResearchers and Government collaborators will be discussed by the panel.
    [Show full text]
  • Whither Deprecating TCP-MD5? a Light Dose of Reality Vs
    Deprecating MD5 for LDP draft-nslag-mpls-deprecate-md5- 00.txt The IETF MPLS and PALS WG Chairs Our Problem • Control plane protocols are often carried over simple transport layers such as UDP or TCP. • Control planes are good targets for attack and their disruption or subversion can have serious operational consequences. • TCP RST attacks against BGP routers were the original motivation for RFC 2385, TCP-MD5. • LDP runs over TCP. • It currently uses TCP MD5 for authentication, which is no longer considered secure (see RFC 5925) • This is frequently pointed out to us when our documents go to the IESG for publication. Small Survey among operators and vendors - I • The survey was totally un-scientific, and just a small number of vendors and operators were asked. Questions could be better formulated. • Operators were asked. • If TCP-AO were available in products, would you use it? • Are you planning to deploy it? • Vendors were asked. • Do you have TCP-AO? • We will consider making a bigger and more scientific survey to send out to “everybody”. Small Survey among operators and vendors - II • Operators answered: • No plan to deploy TCP-AO as long as vendors support their MD-5 implementations. • Very few authenticated LDP sessions. • There is a cost to deploy TCP-AO. • Vendors answered: • No we don’t have TCP-AO in our products. • One vendor said that it will be available later this year. • We will not implement it until we hear from the operators that they need it. What we need • A security suit that: • Is more secure than MD5 when used over the long-lived sessions that support routing.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of DTLS Implementations Using Protocol State Fuzzing
    Analysis of DTLS Implementations Using Protocol State Fuzzing Paul Fiterau-Brostean and Bengt Jonsson, Uppsala University; Robert Merget, Ruhr-University Bochum; Joeri de Ruiter, SIDN Labs; Konstantinos Sagonas, Uppsala University; Juraj Somorovsky, Paderborn University https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity20/presentation/fiterau-brostean This paper is included in the Proceedings of the 29th USENIX Security Symposium. August 12–14, 2020 978-1-939133-17-5 Open access to the Proceedings of the 29th USENIX Security Symposium is sponsored by USENIX. Analysis of DTLS Implementations Using Protocol State Fuzzing Paul Fiterau-Bro¸stean˘ Bengt Jonsson Robert Merget Joeri de Ruiter Uppsala University Uppsala University Ruhr University Bochum SIDN Labs Konstantinos Sagonas Juraj Somorovsky Uppsala University Paderborn University Abstract reach 11.6 billion by 2021 [26]. This will constitute half of all devices connected to the Internet, with the percentage set to Recent years have witnessed an increasing number of proto- grow in subsequent years. Such trends also increase the need cols relying on UDP. Compared to TCP, UDP offers perfor- to ensure that software designed for these devices is properly mance advantages such as simplicity and lower latency. This scrutinized, particularly with regards to its security. has motivated its adoption in Voice over IP, tunneling techno- DTLS is also used as one of the two security protocols in logies, IoT, and novel Web protocols. To protect sensitive data WebRTC, a framework enabling real-time communication. exchange in these scenarios, the DTLS protocol has been de- WebRTC can be used, for example, to implement video con- veloped as a cryptographic variation of TLS.
    [Show full text]
  • Prying Open Pandora's Box: KCI Attacks Against
    Prying open Pandora’s box: KCI attacks against TLS Clemens Hlauschek, Markus Gruber, Florian Fankhauser, Christian Schanes RISE – Research Industrial Systems Engineering GmbH {clemens.hlauschek, markus.gruber, florian.fankhauser, christian.schanes}@rise-world.com Abstract and implementations of the protocol: their utility is ex- tremely limited, their raison d’ˆetre is practically nil, and Protection of Internet communication is becoming more the existence of these insecure key agreement options common in many products, as the demand for privacy only adds to the arsenal of attack vectors against cryp- in an age of state-level adversaries and crime syndi- tographically secured communication on the Internet. cates is steadily increasing. The industry standard for doing this is TLS. The TLS protocol supports a multi- 1 Introduction tude of key agreement and authentication options which provide various different security guarantees. Recent at- The TLS protocol [1, 2, 3] is probably the most tacks showed that this plethora of cryptographic options widely used cryptographic protocol on the Internet. in TLS (including long forgotten government backdoors, It is designed to secure the communication between which have been cunningly inserted via export restric- client/server applications against eavesdropping, tamper- tion laws) is a Pandora’s box, waiting to be pried open by ing, and message forgery, and it also provides additional, heinous computer whizzes. Novel attacks lay hidden in optional security properties such as client authentica- plainsight. Parts of TLS areso oldthat theirfoul smell of tion. TLS is an historically grown giant: its predecessor, rot cannot be easily distinguished from the flowery smell SSL [4,5], was developed more than 20 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Journey to a RTE-Free X.509 Parser
    Journey to a RTE-free X.509 parser Arnaud Ebalard, Patricia Mouy, and Ryad Benadjila [email protected] ANSSI Abstract. The C programming language is a security nightmare. It is error-prone and unsafe, but, year after year, the conclusion remains the same: no credible alternative will replace C in a foreseeable future; especially in low-level developments or for constrained environments. Additionally, even though some C developers are keen to drop this lan- guage when possible for more robust ones like ADA or Rust, converting the existing code basis to safer alternatives seems unrealistic. One of the positive aspects with C is nevertheless that its inherent flaws became a long time ago a full-time research topic for many people. Various static analysis tools exist to try and verify security aspects of C code, from the absence of run-time errors (RTE) to the verification of functional aspects. At the time of writing, none of these tools is capable of verifying the full-fledged C source code from most well-known software projects, even the smallest ones. Those tools are nonetheless getting better, and they may be able to handle large software code bases in the near future. Doing some steps in the direction of static analysis tools is sometimes sufficient to achieve full verification of a complex piece of code. This article details this kind of meet-in-the-middle approach applied to the development in C99 of a X.509 parser, and then its later verification using Frama-C. Table of Contents Journey to a RTE-free X.509 parser ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Journey to a RTE-Free X.509 Parser
    Journey to a RTE-free X.509 parser Arnaud Ebalard, Patricia Mouy, and Ryad Benadjila [email protected] ANSSI Abstract. C programming language is a security nightmare. It is error- prone and unsafe, but, year after year, the conclusion remains the same: no credible alternative will replace C in a foreseeable future; all the more in low-level developments or for constrained environments. Additionally, even though some C developers are keen to drop this lan- guage when possible for more robust ones like ADA or Rust, converting the existing code basis to safer alternatives seems unrealistic. But one of the positive aspects with C is that its inherent flaws became a long time ago a full-time research topic for many people. Various static analysis tools exist to try and verify security aspects of C code, from the absence of run-time errors (RTE) to the verification of functional aspects. At the time of writing, none of these tools is capable of verifying the full-fledged C source code from most well-known software projects, even the smallest ones. Those tools are nonetheless getting better, and they may be able to handle large software code bases in the near future. Meanwhile, doing some steps in the direction of static analysis tools is sometimes sufficient to achieve full verification of a complex piece of code. This article details this kind of meet-in-the-middle approach applied to the development in C99 of a X.509 parser, and then its later verification using Frama-C. 1 Introduction In a nutshell, the aim of the project was to develop a “guaranteed RTE-free X.509 parser”, so that it could be used safely for syntactic and semantic verification of certificates before their usual processing in an implementation (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Showcase Your Company at the Annual Convergence of Industry Leaders in Commercial Cryptography
    Showcase Your Company at the Annual Convergence of Industry Leaders in Commercial Cryptography Almost 300 commercial cryptography professionals from 22 countries came together last May in Ottawa for the International Cryptographic Module Conference—the industry’s leading forum for data security based in commercial encryption. For 2017, we’re building on that success with additional events and up-to-the-minute sessions and content and we’re continuing our in-depth coverage of cryptographic policies, standards, technologies, implementation, and markets. Reserve your place now at this gathering of professionals who develop, test, certify, specify, procure, and rely on these technologies. NEW Tracks Added to A Unique Promotion Conference Agenda Opportunity The conference at ICMC includes over Promotion opportunities are 70 presentations in nine tracks: available for leading companies offering products, technologies and General Technology: Tools and The International Cryptographic techniques relating to cryptographic services in this evolving field. It’s a modules Module Conference is a growing unique opportunity to showcase forum for global expertise in your company to an engaged and Advanced Technology: High-level commercial cryptography. At the technology issues, or special-focus highly responsive audience. The subject matter fifth annual edition of the event features an efficient three-day conference in May, industry leaders participation format that respects Certification Programs: Issues from over 20 countries will convene related to the CMVP, government your busy schedule. programs and global certification to address the unique challenges faced by those who produce, use, In a Central Location User Experience: CM products, and test cryptographic modules, certifications, and vulnerabilities for Located in a beautiful, walkable city with a strong focus on standards organizations that rely on crypto environment with restaurants, security such as FIPS 140-2, ISO/IEC 19790, shopping and other sites, the and Common Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • CCSP: a Compressed Certificate Status Protocol
    CCSP: a Compressed Certificate Status Protocol Antonios A. Chariton∗, Eirini Degkleri∗†, Panagiotis Papadopoulos∗†, Panagiotis Ilia∗†, and Evangelos P. Markatos∗† ∗University of Crete, Greece, [email protected] †FORTH-ICS, Greece, fdegleri, panpap, pilia, [email protected] Abstract—Trust in SSL-based communications is provided by website is stolen, the issued certificate needs to be revoked, Certificate Authorities (CAs) in the form of signed certificates. and users need to be updated as soon as possible in order to Checking the validity of a certificate involves three steps: (i) no more trust web servers using this certificate. There are two checking its expiration date, (ii) verifying its signature, and (iii) ensuring that it is not revoked. Currently, such certificate main ways for the web browsers to know when a certificate revocation checks are done either via Certificate Revocation Lists has been revoked. The simplest and more traditional one is by (CRLs) or Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) servers. downloading the list of all revoked certificates, the Certificate Unfortunately, despite the existence of these revocation checks, Revocation List (CRL), from the CA and locally lookup if the sophisticated cyber-attackers, may trick web browsers to trust a certificate is included in the CRL. If included, it means that the revoked certificate, believing that it is still valid. Consequently, the web browser will communicate (over TLS) with web servers certificate has been revoked and should not be trusted anymore. controlled by cyber-attackers. However, the increasing size of these CRLs [6] with median Although frequently updated, nonced, and timestamped certifi- size of 51 KB, reaching as large as 76 MB in some cases cates may reduce the frequency and impact of such cyber-attacks, [16], [20], has forced the clients to download CRLs rather they impose a very large overhead to the CAs and OCSP servers, sporadically.
    [Show full text]
  • Anonymity and One-Way Authentication in Key Exchange Protocols
    Designs, Codes and Cryptography manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Anonymity and one-way authentication in key exchange protocols Ian Goldberg · Douglas Stebila · Berkant Ustaoglu January 5, 2012 Abstract Key establishment is a crucial cryptographic primitive for building secure communication channels between two parties in a network. It has been studied extensively in theory and widely deployed in practice. In the research literature a typical protocol in the public-key setting aims for key secrecy and mutual authentication. However, there are many important practical scenarios where mutual authentication is undesirable, such as in anonymity networks like Tor, or is difficult to achieve due to insufficient public-key infrastructure at the user level, as is the case on the Internet today. In this work we are concerned with the scenario where two parties establish a private shared session key, but only one party authenticates to the other; in fact, the unauthenticated party may wish to have strong anonymity guar- antees. We present a desirable set of security, authentication, and anonymity goals for this setting and develop a model which captures these properties. Our approach allows for clients to choose among different levels of authen- tication. We also describe an attack on a previous protocol of Øverlier and Syverson, and present a new, efficient key exchange protocol that provides one-way authentication and anonymity. Keywords Key exchange One-way authentication Anonymity Tor network Protocols Security· models · · · · Mathematics Subject Classification (2000) 94A60 Cryptography Ian Goldberg Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. E-mail: [email protected] Douglas Stebila Information Security Institute, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
    [Show full text]