DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Tableau Ps4vsxone Af

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Tableau Ps4vsxone Af Who will win - PlayStation 4 or Xbox One? First, a big THANK YOU, and terms of usage. The first mass- market console.. This data story has been created by Christian A. Schiller for Udacity Data Analyst Nanodegree (DAND) in January 2018. A big thank you goes to www.MobyGames.com for providing API access to the huge games database for purpose of this Udacity DAND student project. This data story is made exclusively for this student project and is NOT to be redistributed or used in any other way without explicit permission by both Christian A. Schiller AND MobyGames. Please contact webmaster at carpeludum dot com for inquiries. What is MobyGames? MobyGames is the working name of an extremely ambitious project: To meticulously catalog all relevant information - credits, screenshots, formats, and release info - about electronic games (computer, console, and arcade) on a game-by-game basis, and then offer up that information through flexible queries and "data mining". In layman's terms, it's a huge game database. MobyGames is the world's largest and most flexible electronic game documentation project in existence. And best of all, it's added to, rated, and reviewed by you--the gaming public. MobyGames is, literally, built by gamers. Who will win - PlayStation 4 or Xbox One? Fir The first mass-market console was Atari 2600, historians name this "generation 2". The console with the longest lifetime The st, (years with >24 game releases per year) is Microsoft's XBox 360 with 13 years, and still going. But who will be the longest view a b runner of current generation 8? on i.. tot.. Platform Lifetime Generation Platform 2 Atari 2600 Intellivision Game releases per year 3 Master System 24 NES 500 Mega Drive/Gen.. 4 1.000 PC Engine SNES 1.422 5 Nintendo 64 PlayStation 1 Saturn 6 Dreamcast Gamecube PlayStation 2 Xbox 7 PlayStation 3 Wii Xbox 360 PlayStation 4 8 PlayStation 4 or Xbox One? Wii U Wii U is already declining Xbox One 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 Year Who will win - PlayStation 4 or Xbox One? Th The view on total game releases per platform over time shows a general increase of games, reflecting the videogame Look e f industry growth (top graph). There has always been a "battle of systems" - some games are released exclusively for only ing a irs one platform (bottom graph). t the t .. ove.. 3K Platform Atari 2600 Master S.. PC Engine PlayStati.. Wii U s e 2K Dreamcast Mega Dri.. PlayStati.. Saturn Xbox m a Gamecube NES PlayStati.. SNES Xbox 360 g l a Intellivisi.. Nintendo .. PlayStati.. Wii Xbox One t o 1K T 0K 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Year 3K s e Hover over a platform in top m a 2K graph to highlight exclusive g e games for it in bottom graph! v i s u l 1K c x E 0K 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Year Who will win - PlayStation 4 or Xbox One? Th Looking at the overall ratio of exclusive game releases (independent of platform) reveals a steady decline, showing an The i e v industry-trend towards more multi-platform games. But there are visible dips in the years 1984/85, 1996, 2006/07 and nves ie. 2014/15! - Let's investigate those. tigat . ion .. 100 90 80 70 o i 60 t a R e v i 50 s u l c x E 40 30 Dip 2 20 Dip 3 Dip 1 10 0 Dip 4 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 Year Who will win - PlayStation 4 or Xbox One? Lo The investigation shows that these dips correlate with video game generation changes, when game releases decline for the Wha ok then-current generation and ramps-up for the new generation ("total games"). The four graphs show total games and t do in exclusives per dip & generation. es th g.. is .. Generation Generation 2 3 4 5 . a 200 Dip 1 a Dip 2 g g 400 l l a 100 a t t 200 o o T 0 T . v 100 v 100 i i s s u u l 50 l 50 c c x x E 0 E 0 1982 1984 1986 1982 1984 1986 1995 1996 1997 1998 1995 1996 1997 1998 Year Year Year Year Generation Generation 6 7 7 8 . a s 2K l e g Dip 3 Dip 4 a l 1000 t m a o 1K a t T g o 500 T 0K . v 100 v 100 i i s s u u l 50 l 50 c c x x E 0 E 0 2006 2008 2010 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2012 2014 2016 Year Year Year Year Who will win - PlayStation 4 or Xbox One? Th What does this mean for the current generation 8? First, look at the whole lifetime of generation 7. For PlayStation 3 and Play e i Xbox 360, peaks of exclusivity ratio are BEFORE peaks of game releases. For Nintendo Wii, it is the opposite - Exclusivity Stati nv ratio peaks AFTER game release peak. on 3 e.. sho.. Generation 7 800 Platform PlayStation 3 s 600 e Wii m a Xbox 360 g l 400 a t o T 200 0 50 40 o i t a R 30 e v i s u l 20 c x E 10 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year Who will win - PlayStation 4 or Xbox One? W PlayStation 3 shows a steady decline in exclusivity ratio after introduction. Wii and Xbox 360 show late pushes of exclusive Inve ha games after initial peaks of game releases. After the respective exclusivity peaks, all platform game releases decline, stig t d resulting in end of life. atio o.. n of.. Generation 7 800 *the small "resurgence" of PS3 and Platform Xbox360 in 2017 should be PlayStation 3 investigated in another data story, s 600 probably other factors than e Wii exclusivity ratio drove this. m a Xbox 360 g l 400 a t o T 200 0 50 Wii exclusivity 40 late push in 2009 o i t a R 30 e v Xbox 360 exclusivity i s u l 20 late push in 2013 c x E 10 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year Who will win - PlayStation 4 or Xbox One? Pl Investigation of the current generation 8 reveals that Nintendo's Wii U is already declining due to the shift to the Switch CON ay console. CLU St Therefore, the contest of "winning" this generation (=longest lifetime) is really boiled down to a decision between SIO a.. PlayStation 4 and XBox One! N: .. Generation 8 - Nintendo drops out 1500 Platform PlayStation 4 s e 1000 Wii U m a Xbox One g l a t o 500 T Wii U game releases decline after 0 introduction of Switch. In this case, 50 product strategy instead of exclusivity ratio drives end-of-life for this platform 40 o i t a R 30 e v i s u l 20 c x E 10 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year Who will win - PlayStation 4 or Xbox One? In CONCLUSION: PlayStation 4 wins, most likely! Based on the correlation found between exclusive ratio and platform decline BON ve over the past four decades, and the fact that this ratio is already declining for Xbox One, it is highly likely that PlayStation 4 US sti will enjoy a longer lifetime. g.. Generation 8 - Final Contest 1500 Platform PlayStation 4 s e 1000 Xbox One m a g l a t o 500 game release gap widens T in favor of PlayStation 4 0 50 40 o i Xbox One exclusivity ratio steadily t a decreases. Peak was already at R 30 e PlayStation 4 exclusivity ratio still increases. v i the very beginning of lifetime! s No peak yet! u l 20 c x E 10 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year Who will win - PlayStation 4 or Xbox One? CO BONUS An in NC tere LU stin S.. g a.. The following slides are some additional data visualisations created with the data "easily" reachable via MobyGames API. More interesting correlation investigations, such as based on geography or publisher/developer data, require different usage of APIs (requests per game instead of per platform - would result in thousands of API queries!), which could not be realised within the timeframe of the Udacity DAND project. Who will win - PlayStation 4 or Xbox One? B An interesting area of investigating could be if there is a correlation of game ratings and generation change. Data shows The O that in general, MobyGames user scores for games increased constantly over the last 40 years. But no (visually) significant avail N dips like for exclusivity ratio. able US dat.. Average Mobygame score per year 5,0 4,5 Number of votes required per game to count for average calculation 10 to 761 4,0 2 e 3,5 r o c S y 3,0 b o M 2,5 . n h c s 2,0 h c r u D 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 Year Who will win - PlayStation 4 or Xbox One? An The available data also includes genre information of games (action, RPG, strategy, sports, ...).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A History of Video Game Consoles Introduction the First Generation
    A History of Video Game Consoles By Terry Amick – Gerald Long – James Schell – Gregory Shehan Introduction Today video games are a multibillion dollar industry. They are in practically all American households. They are a major driving force in electronic innovation and development. Though, you would hardly guess this from their modest beginning. The first video games were played on mainframe computers in the 1950s through the 1960s (Winter, n.d.). Arcade games would be the first glimpse for the general public of video games. Magnavox would produce the first home video game console featuring the popular arcade game Pong for the 1972 Christmas Season, released as Tele-Games Pong (Ellis, n.d.). The First Generation Magnavox Odyssey Rushed into production the original game did not even have a microprocessor. Games were selected by using toggle switches. At first sales were poor because people mistakenly believed you needed a Magnavox TV to play the game (GameSpy, n.d., para. 11). By 1975 annual sales had reached 300,000 units (Gamester81, 2012). Other manufacturers copied Pong and began producing their own game consoles, which promptly got them sued for copyright infringement (Barton, & Loguidice, n.d.). The Second Generation Atari 2600 Atari released the 2600 in 1977. Although not the first, the Atari 2600 popularized the use of a microprocessor and game cartridges in video game consoles. The original device had an 8-bit 1.19MHz 6507 microprocessor (“The Atari”, n.d.), two joy sticks, a paddle controller, and two game cartridges. Combat and Pac Man were included with the console. In 2007 the Atari 2600 was inducted into the National Toy Hall of Fame (“National Toy”, n.d.).
    [Show full text]
  • First Amendment Protection of Artistic Entertainment: Toward Reasonable Municipal Regulation of Video Games
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 36 Issue 5 Issue 5 - October 1983 Article 2 10-1983 First Amendment Protection of Artistic Entertainment: Toward Reasonable Municipal Regulation of Video Games John E. Sullivan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the First Amendment Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation John E. Sullivan, First Amendment Protection of Artistic Entertainment: Toward Reasonable Municipal Regulation of Video Games, 36 Vanderbilt Law Review 1223 (1983) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol36/iss5/2 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTE First Amendment Protection of Artistic Entertainment: Toward Reasonable Municipal Regulation of Video Games Outline I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 1225 II. LOCAL GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF VIDEO GAMES . 1232 A. Zoning Regulation ......................... 1232 1. Video Games Permitted by Right ........ 1232 2. Video Games as Conditional or Special U ses .................................. 1233 3. Video Games as Accessory Uses ......... 1234 4. Special Standards for Establishments Of- fering Video Game Entertainment ....... 1236 a. Age of Players and Hours of Opera- tion Standards .................. 1236 b. Arcade Space and Structural Stan- dards ........................... 1237 c. Arcade Location Standards....... 1237 d. Noise, Litter, and Parking Stan- dards ........................... 1238 e. Adult Supervision Standards ..... 1239 B. Licensing Regulation ....................... 1239 1. Licensing and Zoning Distinguished ...... 1239 2. Video Game Licensing Standards ........ 1241 3. Administration of Video Game Licensing. 1242 a. Denial of a License .............
    [Show full text]
  • Master List of Games This Is a List of Every Game on a Fully Loaded SKG Retro Box, and Which System(S) They Appear On
    Master List of Games This is a list of every game on a fully loaded SKG Retro Box, and which system(s) they appear on. Keep in mind that the same game on different systems may be vastly different in graphics and game play. In rare cases, such as Aladdin for the Sega Genesis and Super Nintendo, it may be a completely different game. System Abbreviations: • GB = Game Boy • GBC = Game Boy Color • GBA = Game Boy Advance • GG = Sega Game Gear • N64 = Nintendo 64 • NES = Nintendo Entertainment System • SMS = Sega Master System • SNES = Super Nintendo • TG16 = TurboGrafx16 1. '88 Games ( Arcade) 2. 007: Everything or Nothing (GBA) 3. 007: NightFire (GBA) 4. 007: The World Is Not Enough (N64, GBC) 5. 10 Pin Bowling (GBC) 6. 10-Yard Fight (NES) 7. 102 Dalmatians - Puppies to the Rescue (GBC) 8. 1080° Snowboarding (N64) 9. 1941: Counter Attack ( Arcade, TG16) 10. 1942 (NES, Arcade, GBC) 11. 1943: Kai (TG16) 12. 1943: The Battle of Midway (NES, Arcade) 13. 1944: The Loop Master ( Arcade) 14. 1999: Hore, Mitakotoka! Seikimatsu (NES) 15. 19XX: The War Against Destiny ( Arcade) 16. 2 on 2 Open Ice Challenge ( Arcade) 17. 2010: The Graphic Action Game (Colecovision) 18. 2020 Super Baseball ( Arcade, SNES) 19. 21-Emon (TG16) 20. 3 Choume no Tama: Tama and Friends: 3 Choume Obake Panic!! (GB) 21. 3 Count Bout ( Arcade) 22. 3 Ninjas Kick Back (SNES, Genesis, Sega CD) 23. 3-D Tic-Tac-Toe (Atari 2600) 24. 3-D Ultra Pinball: Thrillride (GBC) 25. 3-D WorldRunner (NES) 26. 3D Asteroids (Atari 7800) 27.
    [Show full text]
  • Master List of Games This Is a List of Every Game on a Fully Loaded SKG Retro Box, and Which System(S) They Appear On
    Master List of Games This is a list of every game on a fully loaded SKG Retro Box, and which system(s) they appear on. Keep in mind that the same game on different systems may be vastly different in graphics and game play. In rare cases, such as Aladdin for the Sega Genesis and Super Nintendo, it may be a completely different game. System Abbreviations: • GB = Game Boy • GBC = Game Boy Color • GBA = Game Boy Advance • GG = Sega Game Gear • N64 = Nintendo 64 • NES = Nintendo Entertainment System • SMS = Sega Master System • SNES = Super Nintendo • TG16 = TurboGrafx16 1. '88 Games (Arcade) 2. 007: Everything or Nothing (GBA) 3. 007: NightFire (GBA) 4. 007: The World Is Not Enough (N64, GBC) 5. 10 Pin Bowling (GBC) 6. 10-Yard Fight (NES) 7. 102 Dalmatians - Puppies to the Rescue (GBC) 8. 1080° Snowboarding (N64) 9. 1941: Counter Attack (TG16, Arcade) 10. 1942 (NES, Arcade, GBC) 11. 1942 (Revision B) (Arcade) 12. 1943 Kai: Midway Kaisen (Japan) (Arcade) 13. 1943: Kai (TG16) 14. 1943: The Battle of Midway (NES, Arcade) 15. 1944: The Loop Master (Arcade) 16. 1999: Hore, Mitakotoka! Seikimatsu (NES) 17. 19XX: The War Against Destiny (Arcade) 18. 2 on 2 Open Ice Challenge (Arcade) 19. 2010: The Graphic Action Game (Colecovision) 20. 2020 Super Baseball (SNES, Arcade) 21. 21-Emon (TG16) 22. 3 Choume no Tama: Tama and Friends: 3 Choume Obake Panic!! (GB) 23. 3 Count Bout (Arcade) 24. 3 Ninjas Kick Back (SNES, Genesis, Sega CD) 25. 3-D Tic-Tac-Toe (Atari 2600) 26. 3-D Ultra Pinball: Thrillride (GBC) 27.
    [Show full text]
  • Procedural Audio for Video Games
    Procedural Audio for Video Games: Are we there yet ? Nicolas Fournel – Principal Audio Programmer Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Overview • What is procedural audio ? • How can we implement it in games ? • Pre-production • Design • Implementation • Quality Assurance What is Procedural Audio ? First, a couple of definitions… Procedural refers to the process that computes a particular function Procedural content generation generating content by computing functions Procedural techniques in other domains Landscape generation • Fractals (terrain) • L-systems (plants) • Perlin noise (clouds) Procedural techniques in other domains Texture generation • Perlin noise • Voronoi diagrams Procedural techniques in other domains City creation (e.g. CityEngine) Procedural techniques in other domains • Demo scene: 64 Kb / 4Kb / 1 Kb intros • .kkrieger: 3D first person shooter in 96K from Farbrausch Procedural content in games A few examples: • Sentinel • Elite • DEFCON • Spore • Love Present in some form or another in a lot of games What does that teach us ? Procedural content generation is used: • due to memory constraints or other technology limitations • when there is too much content to create • when we need variations of the same asset • when the asset changes depending on the game context What does that teach us ? • Data is created at run-time • Is based on a set of rules • Is controllable by the game engine Defining Procedural Audio For sound effects: • Real-time sound synthesis • With exposed control parameters • Examples of existing systems: • Staccato Systems: racing and footsteps • WWISE SoundSeed (Impact and Wind / Whoosh) • AudioGaming Defining Procedural Audio For dialogue: • real-time speech synthesis e.g. Phonetic Arts, SPASM • voice manipulation systems e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Educational Computer Games
    Beyond Edutainment Exploring the Educational Potential of Computer Games By Simon Egenfeldt-nielsen Submitted to the IT-University of Copenhagen as partial fulfilment of the requirements for the PhD degree February, 2005 Candidate: Simon Egenfeldt-Nielsen Købmagergade 11A, 4. floor 1150 Copenhagen +45 40107969 [email protected] Supervisors: Anker Helms Jørgensen and Carsten Jessen Abstract Computer games have attracted much attention over the years, mostly attention of the less flattering kind. This has been true for computer games focused on entertainment, but also for what for years seemed a sure winner, edutainment. This dissertation aims to be a modest contribution to understanding educational use of computer games by building a framework that goes beyond edutainment. A framework that goes beyond the limitations of edutainment, not relying on a narrow perception of computer games in education. The first part of the dissertation outlines the background for building an inclusive and solid framework for educational use of computer games. Such a foundation includes a variety of quite different perspectives for example educational media and non-electronic games. It is concluded that educational use of computer games remains strongly influenced by educational media leading to the domination of edutainment. The second part takes up the challenges posed in part 1 looking to especially educational theory and computer games research to present alternatives. By drawing on previous research three generations of educational computer games are identified. The first generation is edutainment that perceives the use of computer games as a direct way to change behaviours through repeated action. The second generation puts the spotlight on the relation between computer game and player.
    [Show full text]
  • The Platform Culture of Intellivision
    Implementing Intelligence: The Platform Culture of Intellivision Tom Boellstorff The University of California, Irvine Department of Anthropology 3151 Social Science Plaza Irvine, CA 92697-5100 949-824-9944 [email protected] Braxton Soderman The University of California, Irvine Department of Film and Media Studies 2000 Humanities Gateway Irvine, California 92697-2435 949-824-3532 [email protected] Keywords Platform, Platform Studies, Intellivision, Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence, Aesthetics INTRODUCTION The Intellivision home game console, developed by Mattel Electronics in the late 1970s and early 1980s, is an understudied platform in the history of video games. The portmanteau “Intellivision” invokes the idea of an “intelligent television” while also alluding to the system’s intelligent vision as a game console. The system’s name functioned as a marketing maneuver that fought two-fronts simultaneously: elevating the system above the more popular (but less technologically sophisticated) Atari VCS while remediating the television (understood pejoratively as the idiot box). Yet, beyond these obvious implications, we argue that Mattel Electronics cultivated an aesthetics and pragmatics of intelligence that shaped the entire Intellivision platform: from the initial hardware design that sought to produce “sophisticated game play” (Chandler, 1982) to the design of the system’s unique controllers that resembled touch-button phones, from its library of games that often redefined play through notions of seriousness, strategy, education, and simulation to Mattel’s embrace of a modular and extendable platform that promoted an aesthetic of augmented intelligence through various peripheral devices. If the Intellivision did not have the processing power and memory for encoding complex artificial intelligence, then how was “intelligence” implemented into the system? This paper explores how cultural assumptions about intelligence were expressed within a platform containing severe technical limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellivision Development, Back in the Day
    Intellivision Development, Back In The Day Intellivision Development, Back In The Day Page 1 of 28 Intellivision Development, Back In The Day Table of Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................................3 Overall Process................................................................................................................................5 APh Technological Consulting..........................................................................................................6 Host Hardware and Operating System........................................................................................6 Development Tools......................................................................................................................7 CP-1610 Assembler................................................................................................................7 Text Editor...............................................................................................................................7 Pixel Editor..............................................................................................................................8 Test Harnesses............................................................................................................................8 Tight Finances...........................................................................................................................10 Mattel Electronics...........................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Download of Triples in RDF- XML Form
    UC Santa Cruz Library Staff Presentations and Research Title Implementing Controlled Vocabularies for Computer Game Platforms and Media Formats in SKOS Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/36n779t4 Journal Journal of Library Metadata, 16(1) ISSN 1938-6389 1937-5034 Authors Kaltman, Eric Wardrip-fruin, Noah Mastroni, Mitch et al. Publication Date 2016-06-21 DOI 10.1080/19386389.2016.1167494 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of Library Metadata ISSN: 1938-6389 (Print) 1937-5034 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/wjlm20 Implementing Controlled Vocabularies for Computer Game Platforms and Media Formats in SKOS Eric Kaltman, Noah Wardrip-fruin, Mitch Mastroni, Henry Lowood, Greta De groat, Glynn Edwards, Marcia Barrett & Christy Caldwell To cite this article: Eric Kaltman, Noah Wardrip-fruin, Mitch Mastroni, Henry Lowood, Greta De groat, Glynn Edwards, Marcia Barrett & Christy Caldwell (2016) Implementing Controlled Vocabularies for Computer Game Platforms and Media Formats in SKOS, Journal of Library Metadata, 16:1, 1-22, DOI: 10.1080/19386389.2016.1167494 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2016.1167494 Published online: 21 Jun 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 470 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=wjlm20 Journal of Library Metadata, 16:1–22, 2016 Published with license by Taylor & Francis
    [Show full text]
  • Premiere Issue Monkeying Around Game Reviews: Special Report
    Atari Coleco Intellivision Computers Vectrex Arcade ClassicClassic GamerGamer Premiere Issue MagazineMagazine Fall 1999 www.classicgamer.com U.S. “Because Newer Isn’t Necessarily Better!” Special Report: Classic Videogames at E3 Monkeying Around Revisiting Donkey Kong Game Reviews: Atari, Intellivision, etc... Lost Arcade Classic: Warp Warp Deep Thaw Chris Lion Rediscovers His Atari Plus! · Latest News · Guide to Halloween Games · Win the book, “Phoenix” “As long as you enjoy the system you own and the software made for it, there’s no reason to mothball your equipment just because its manufacturer’s stock dropped.” - Arnie Katz, Editor of Electronic Games Magazine, 1984 Classic Gamer Magazine Fall 1999 3 Volume 1, Version 1.2 Fall 1999 PUBLISHER/EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Chris Cavanaugh - [email protected] ASSOCIATE EDITOR Sarah Thomas - [email protected] STAFF WRITERS Kyle Snyder- [email protected] Reset! 5 Chris Lion - [email protected] Patrick Wong - [email protected] Raves ‘N Rants — Letters from our readers 6 Darryl Guenther - [email protected] Mike Genova - [email protected] Classic Gamer Newswire — All the latest news 8 Damien Quicksilver [email protected] Frank Traut - [email protected] Lee Seitz - [email protected] Book Bytes - Joystick Nation 12 LAYOUT/DESIGN Classic Advertisement — Arcadia Supercharger 14 Chris Cavanaugh PHOTO CREDITS Atari 5200 15 Sarah Thomas - Staff Photographer Pong Machine scan (page 3) courtesy The “New” Classic Gamer — Opinion Column 16 Sean Kelly - Digital Press CD-ROM BIRA BIRA Photos courtesy Robert Batina Lost Arcade Classics — ”Warp Warp” 17 CONTACT INFORMATION Classic Gamer Magazine Focus on Intellivision Cartridge Reviews 18 7770 Regents Road #113-293 San Diego, Ca 92122 Doin’ The Donkey Kong — A closer look at our 20 e-mail: [email protected] on the web: favorite monkey http://www.classicgamer.com Atari 2600 Cartridge Reviews 23 SPECIAL THANKS To Sarah.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Dynamics of the US Video Game Console Market
    Can Nintendo Get its Crown Back? Examining the Dynamics of the U.S. Video Game Console Market by Samuel W. Chow B.S. Electrical Engineering, Kettering University, 1997 A.L.M. Extension Studies in Information Technology, Harvard University, 2004 Submitted to the System Design and Management Program, the Technology and Policy Program, and the Engineering Systems Division on May 11, 2007 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Science in Engineering and Management and Master of Science in Technology and Policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2007 C 2007 Samuel W. Chow. All rights reserved The author hereby grants to NIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now know and hereafter created. Signature of Author Samuel W. Chow System Design and Management Program, and Technology and Policy Program May 11, 2007 Certified by James M. Utterback David J. cGrath jr 9) Professor of Management and Innovation I -'hs Supervisor Accepted by Pat Hale Senior Lecturer in Engineering Systems - Director, System Design and Management Program Accepted by Dava J. Newman OF TEOHNOLoGY Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Director, Technology and Policy Program FEB 1 E2008 ARCHNOE LIBRARIES Can Nintendo Get its Crown Back? Examining the Dynamics of the U.S. Video Game Console Market by Samuel W. Chow Submitted to the System Design and Management Program, the Technology and Policy Program, and the Engineering Systems Division on May 11, 2007 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Science in Engineering and Management and Master of Science in Technology and Policy Abstract Several generations of video game consoles have competed in the market since 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 2: History of Video Gaming Hardware: the 2-D Era
    Lecture 2: History of Video Gaming Hardware: The 2-D Era! Prof. Aaron Lanterman! School of Electrical and Computer Engineering! Georgia Institute of Technology! Atari 2600 VCS (1977)! • " 1 MHz MOS 6507! – low-cost version of 6502! • 128 bytes RAM! • First ROM cartridges 2K, later 4K! • Discontinued 1992! • Retro releases now on the market!! Adventure! Solaris! Pics & info from Wikipedia! 2! Atari 2600 Hardware Tricks! • Could put RAM on the cartridge ! – “Atari Super Chip”! – 128 more bytes!! – Jr. Pac-Man! • “Bank switching” to put more ROM on cartridge! – Only 4K immediately addressable - game still has to operate within individual 4K chunks at a time ! – Mr. Do!’s Castle (8K), Road Runner (16K, 1989)! – Fatal Run (only 32K game released, 1990)! Info & pics from AtariAge! 3! Atari 2600 Hardware Tricks! • “M Network” games! – Atari 2600 games produced by Mattel! – Controversial decision within Mattel! – Done by same group that designed the Intellivision: APh Technology Consulting! • Super Charger added 2K RAM! – Originally planned as a hardware add-ons! – Public didn’t seem to like add-ons, so built in separately into each cartridge! – BurgerTime: Cleverness beats hardware!! Info & pic from www.intellivisionlives.com/bluesky/games/credits/atari1.shtml! www.intellivisionlives.com/bluesky/games/credits/atari2.shtml! 4! Atari 2600 - The Chess Story (1)! • “Atari never intended to create a Chess game for the Atari 2600”! • “the original VCS box had a chess piece on it, and Atari was ultimately sued by someone in Florida due to the lack of
    [Show full text]