DOCSLIB.ORG

Greening the City a Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update for the City of Manchester, NH

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Greening the City a Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update for the City of Manchester, NH Greening the City A Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update for the City of Manchester, NH Steering Committee Parks, Recreation & Cemeteries Commission Chair Stephen Johnson Parks, Recreation & Cemeteries Commissioner George “Butch” Joseph Parks, Recreation & Cemeteries Commissioner Sandra Lambert Parks, Recreation & Cemeteries Commissioner Dennis Smith Parks, Recreation & Cemeteries Commissioner Michael Worsley Parks, Recreation & Cemeteries Director Ron Ludwig Parks, Recreation & Cemeteries Deputy Director Chuck DePrima Parks, Recreation & Cemeteries Recreation Enterprise Manager Ed Wojnilowicz Parks, Recreation & Cemeteries Business Service Officer Rick Riddle City of Manchester Community Improvement Program (CIP) Manager Sam Maranto City of Manchester Athletic Director Joe Raycraft January 2006 Prepared by: peter j. smith & company, inc. Buffalo, NY and Fort Erie, ON A city, like a living thing, is a united and continuous whole. Plutarch (approximately AD 50-120) Greening the City Greening the City A Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update for the City of Manchester, NH Table of Contents Page Number 1.0 Introduction.............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of the Plan ............................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background − ‘Lungs’ of the City............................................................................. 1 1.3 Greening the City: A Parks & Recreation Master Plan ............................................... 3 1.4 Methodology ......................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Goals, Objectives, Policies & Recommendations .......................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................. 7 2.3 Policies ................................................................................................................. 9 2.4 Recommendations ............................................................................................... 10 3.0 Park Classification ................................................................................................... 25 3.1 Historic Existing Parks Classification System .......................................................... 25 3.2 New Parks Classification System ........................................................................... 25 4.0 Systems Plan .......................................................................................................... 35 5.0 Trends Analysis....................................................................................................... 39 5.1 Overview............................................................................................................. 39 5.2 National Trends ................................................................................................... 40 5.3 Regional Trends .................................................................................................. 45 5.4 Local Trends ....................................................................................................... 49 5.5 Demographic Trends............................................................................................ 55 6.0 Park System Capital Improvements .......................................................................... 59 6.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 59 6.2 Parks .................................................................................................................. 59 6.3 School Grounds ..................................................................................................115 6.4 Mini Parks ..........................................................................................................134 7.0 Parks & Recreation Facilities Standards....................................................................145 7.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................145 7.2 Findings .............................................................................................................146 8.0 Inventory...............................................................................................................155 8.1 Facilities Inventory..............................................................................................155 9.0 Recreational Programming......................................................................................161 9.1 Programming the Parks.......................................................................................161 9.2 Manchester in Context ........................................................................................162 9.3 Programming for the Green City ..........................................................................163 9.4 Program Inventory..............................................................................................163 9.5 Overview............................................................................................................177 9.6 Key findings from Focus Groups ..........................................................................177 9.7 Survey Results....................................................................................................178 peter j. smith & company, inc. i A Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update for Manchester, NH 10.0 NRPA Development Standards ................................................................................179 11.0 Reference Materials................................................................................................183 12.0 UPARR Recovery Action Plan...................................................................................185 12.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................185 12.2 Part I − Assessment............................................................................................185 12.3 Part 2 – Action Plan ............................................................................................211 Index of Tables Page Number Table 3-1 – Parks Classification System ............................................................................... 33 Table 5-1 – Passive and Active Activities.............................................................................. 40 Table 5-2 – Participation Trends in Recreation ..................................................................... 41 Table 5-3 – Change in Recreation Participation .................................................................... 42 Table 5-4 – Selected Trends in Participation 1994-2004........................................................ 43 Table 5-5 – Frequency of Recreation Participation................................................................ 44 Table 5-6 – Recreation Participation: Total US and Youth (000s)........................................... 45 Table 5-7 – Change in Recreation Participation US vs. North East.......................................... 46 Table 5-8 –Geographic Comparison, State and Region.......................................................... 47 Table 5-9 –Geographic Comparison, State and Region.......................................................... 48 Table 5-10 – Sports League Participation............................................................................. 49 Table 5-11 – Survey: Parks and Recreation Facilities ............................................................ 50 Table 5-12 – Survey: Types of Parks ................................................................................... 50 Table 5-13 – Survey: Enhancements ................................................................................... 50 Table 5-14 – Survey: Programs........................................................................................... 51 Table 5-15 – Survey: Program Participation ......................................................................... 51 Table 5-16 – Survey: Activity Participation ........................................................................... 52 Table 5-17 – Recreation Acreage in New Hampshire............................................................. 53 Table 5-18 – Recreation Acreage 2000-2025........................................................................ 53 Table 5-19 – Parks Comparison: High Density Cities ............................................................. 54 Table 5-20 − Population Change 1980-2025......................................................................... 55 Table 5-21 − Population Characteristics – 2000 .................................................................... 56 Table 5-22 − Educational Attainment –2000......................................................................... 57 Table 5-23 − Income Characteristics – 1999 ........................................................................ 57 Table 7-1 − Manchester Recreation Provision Standards ......................................................146 Table 8-1 − Manchester Parks Inventory.............................................................................155
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bristol Eastbayri.Com THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2013 VOL
    PhoenixPhoenixBristol eastbayri.com THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2013 VOL. 177, NO. 46 $1.00 Town: Don’t dock at Quito’s Byfield Fisherman denied taking licks from the waters of in the Coastal Resources Manage- this,” said the Bristol fisherman, dockage at Quito’s, Bristol Harbor, sits a small, wood- ment Council’s (CRMC) assent, Robert Morris, who has presented en dock. dated Feb. 11, 2004. a petition to Bristol Town Council space seeks answers The 5-by-15-foot structure is Yet, one local fisherman has members, asking them to look affixed to four pilings. There’s been ticketed by Bristol Harbor into it. BY CHRISTINE O’CONNOR about enough space for two good- Patrol almost $1,000 for having “Coastal better investigate this [email protected] filled up sized commercial fishing boats to docked there over the course of a thing.” Just outside of Quitos’ Restau- tie up and unload their catch. winter and into this summer. rant next to Independence Park, After all, that’s the use approved “I don’t know where to go with See QUITO’S Page 20 fast Town brought tenants into empty school building without long-term strategy BY CHRISTINE O’CONNOR [email protected] The Town of Bristol has no clear vision for the future of the old Byfield School building on High Street. While town officials initially thought of the building as a busi- ness incubator, its current tenants have their own idea: To utilize the space as an arts collaborative, fos- tering arts in the community. The idea to rent out Byfield’s rooms belongs to Parks and Recreation Director Walter Burke.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting - Board Op Mayor and Aldermen
    215 MEETING - BOARD OP MAYOR AND ALDERMEN SPECIAL ROAD HEARING January 3, 1969 3:00 P.h Mayor Mongan called the meeting to order. I Mayor Mongan called for the Pledge of Allegiance and Aid. Psaledas led the Board in this function. The Clerk called the roll. Roll Cal I Present: Mayor Mongan, Aid. Bergquist, Enright, Walsh, Casey, Larochelle, Verville, Head and Psaledas. Absent: Aid. Hunt, Kelley, Wilcox, Noel, Martineau and Acorace. Mayor Mongan announced the purpose of the meeting was to conduct a special road heari] Purpose V. on a petition as follows: "....laying out and discontinuing a highway, beginning at a point on the Petition northerly line of Loring Street, said point being six hundred (600) feet Loring Street west of the intersection of the westerly line of South Willow Street and the northerly line of Loring Street and measured along the northerly line of Loring Street? thence continuing in the same straight line in a westerly direction, a distance of two hundred ninety-eight and thirty-two one hundredths I (298.32) feet to the Boston and Maine Railroad Right of Way. The above described line to be the northerly line of the highway, the highway to be fifty (50) feet wide and to be known as Loring Street in said City. They, therefore, request you to layout and discontinue the highway on the route above described, subject to twenty-five (25) feet easement for sanitary sewerage II Communications as follows were read into the record by the Clerk: • Department of Highways "At the request of Hr.
    [Show full text]
  • OTL Summer 2006.PUB
    A publication of the Society for American Baseball Research Business of Baseball Committee Volume XII Issue 2 Summer2006 Why is THAT Executive a Hall of Famer? From the Editor Have You Seen His Leadership Stats? By Steve Weingarden, Christian Resick (Florida Interna- The theme of this issue of Outside the Lines is Business of tional University) and Daniel Whitman (Florida Interna- Baseball at SABR 36. Most of the presenters with topics tional University) involving the business of baseball at SABR 36 in Seattle have agreed to recast their presentations as articles for this With another Baseball Hall of Fame induction ceremony and the fall issues of Outside the Lines. now complete, many ecstatic fans have witnessed their en- dorsed candidates immortalized in bronze. As always, fans The set of articles presented here from SABR 36 approach will passionately debate whether or not those enshrined business of baseball from a number of disciplines— actually belong in the hall and will also grumble over psychology, history, geography, American studies, law and which players were snubbed. When compared to their statistics. They reflect the breadth of inquiry in our corner “player-debating” counterparts, those baseball fans pas- of baseball research. We thank each of the authors for their sionately debating which executives should and should not contribution to our understanding of the game. be in the Hall of Fame are relatively less conspicuous. Per- haps some of this can be attributed to the fact that players The only piece not presented in Seattle is an analysis by are measured in so many statistical categories and can be Gary Gillette and Pete Palmer of interleague play and the compared easily while executive performance, in MLB, is MLB’s claims of its significant impact on attendance.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberal Arts & The
    The McDANIEL COLLEGE | Spring 2020 LIBERAL ARTS & THE LAW The McDaniel College Spring 2020 Vol. 35, Number 1 The Hill is published three times yearly by: FEATURES McDaniel College 2 College Hill Westminster, MD 21157-4390 Special Section www.mcdaniel.edu 2 Community Connections Editor: Lindsay Sherman Letter from the President Design: Aldeia / Lilly Pereira A message from President Roger Casey. Alumni correspondence to: A new kind of face time [email protected] or Students, faculty and staff stay connected The Office of Alumni Relations during a global pandemic. McDaniel College 2 College Hill Making an impact Westminster, MD 21157-4390 Alumni step up to serve their communities All other correspondence to: during COVID-19 crisis. [email protected] 410-857-2290 or 14 The Office of Communications Liberal Arts and the Law and Marketing Jennifer Wuamett and Jemar Daniel share how broad McDaniel College experiences led them to success in the legal profession. 2 College Hill Westminster, MD 21157-4390 McDaniel College, in compliance with federal and state laws and regulations governing affirmative action and nondiscrimination, does not discriminate in the recruitment, admission and employment of DEPARTMENTS students, faculty and staff in the operation of any of its educational programs and activities as defined by law. The diverse views presented in this magazine do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editors 6 Mail 24 Invested or official policies of the College. ©2020 McDaniel College Missives to and from The Hill Advancing the vision On the cover: 8 Carpe Diem 28 Alumni Updates Jemar Daniel ’07 is a History News around campus Life since college grad turned entertainment and beyond lawyer for ViacomCBS.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediaguide.Pdf
    American Legion Baseball would like to thank the following: 2017 ALWS schedule THURSDAY – AUGUST 10 Game 1 – 9:30am – Northeast vs. Great Lakes Game 2 – 1:00pm – Central Plains vs. Western Game 3 – 4:30pm – Mid-South vs. Northwest Game 4 – 8:00pm – Southeast vs. Mid-Atlantic Off day – none FRIDAY – AUGUST 11 Game 5 – 4:00pm – Great Lakes vs. Central Plains Game 6 – 7:30pm – Western vs. Northeastern Off day – Mid-Atlantic, Southeast, Mid-South, Northwest SATURDAY – AUGUST 12 Game 7 – 11:30am – Mid-Atlantic vs. Mid-South Game 8 – 3:30pm – Northwest vs. Southeast The American Legion Game 9 – Northeast vs. Central Plains Off day – Great Lakes, Western Code of Sportsmanship SUNDAY – AUGUST 13 Game 10 – Noon – Great Lakes vs. Western I will keep the rules Game 11 – 3:30pm – Mid-Atlantic vs. Northwest Keep faith with my teammates Game 12 – 7:30pm – Southeast vs. Mid-South Keep my temper Off day – Northeast, Central Plains Keep myself fit Keep a stout heart in defeat MONDAY – AUGUST 14 Game 13 – 3:00pm – STARS winner vs. STRIPES runner-up Keep my pride under in victory Game 14 – 7:00pm – STRIPLES winner vs. STARS runner-up Keep a sound soul, a clean mind And a healthy body. TUESDAY – AUGUST 14 – CHAMPIONSHIP TUESDAY Game 15 – 7:00pm – winner game 13 vs. winner game 14 ALWS matches Stars and Stripes On the cover Top left: Logan Vidrine pitches Texarkana AR into the finals The 2017 American Legion World Series will salute the Stars of the ALWS championship with a three-hit performance and Stripes when playing its 91st World Series (92nd year) against previously unbeaten Rockport IN.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIAL MEETING BOARD of MAYOR and ALDERMEN April 15, 2002 7:00 PM Mayor Baines Called the Special Meeting to Order. The
    04/15/02 Special BMA (2) 1 SPECIAL MEETING BOARD OF MAYOR AND ALDERMEN April 15, 2002 7:00 PM Mayor Baines called the special meeting to order. The Clerk called the roll. There were fourteen Aldermen present. Present: Aldermen Wihby, Gatsas, Guinta, Sysyn, Osborne, Pinard, O’Neil, Lopez, Shea, DeVries, Garrity, Smith, Thibault, Forest Mayor Baines advised that the purpose of the special meeting was to receive presentations relative to baseball as follows: a) Chuck Rolecek Group (non-affiliated) -- Mr. Rolecek stated thank you, Mr. Mayor and Board members. Tonight, we hope to convince the Mayor and the Board of Aldermen just exactly where we’re at halfway through the process. Our original meeting about six weeks ago had a 90 day window and we feel as though we are halfway there, but we feel we’ve made a lot of progress and we’d like to have the opportunity to pass out a handbook so the Board can follow along. Most of you know me from the level of press that I’ve gotten in the last week or so, I wish it was more about the restaurant and less about baseball, but we’ll take what we can get. Along with me is Peter Welch one of our partners and John Dittrich a well-known baseball consultant that has been part of our staff since we began this process back last summer. What the Clerk is passing out is just a small package, a short package…some of the pictures that are in the book we’ve shared with you and The Union Leader and for the sake of time and for the sake of efficiency we’re going to go through the book just page-by-page highlighting the key points and not elaborating on too much.
    [Show full text]
  • City-Funded Study Says Sox Fans Won't Stray
    City-Funded Study Says Sox Fans Won’t Stray February 20, 2003 By Michael Cousineau, Union Leader Staff A minor-league baseball team in Manchester could average as many as 5,000 fans a game and should not hurt attendance for the Boston Red Sox, which must approve the Manchester franchise, according to a city-funded feasibility study. A Manchester team also should expect to receive $250,000 a year from selling the naming rights of the proposed stadium slated to open in 2005 along the riverfront, according to the study, performed by Brailsford & Dunlavey, a consultant firm in Washington D.C. Red Sox officials currently are considering whether to permit the Manchester team -- now operating in New Haven, Conn. -- to move to Manchester for the 2004 season to play its first year at Gill Stadium. "The historic attendance analysis illustrates that the introduction of a minor-league team to the market has no effect (or indeed, if anything, a slightly positive correlation) on (Major League Baseball) attendance," said the study. "MLB attendance corresponds more to the team's market size, quality of facility and performance on the field," the firm stated. "Because of the ticket price discrepancy between minor league and MLB, the two are not direct competitors," the study said, noting "many baseball minds believe that the growth of minor-league baseball broadens the reach of the MLB." Mayor Robert Baines, who continues to meet with Red Sox officials, said he was pleased with the feasibility study, which cost the city $33,200. "I think it's bolstered the strength of our position with the Boston Red Sox, " Baines said.
    [Show full text]
  • The COLLEGIATE REVOLUTION SPECIAL EDITION - SPRING 1968 New Hampshire College of Accounting and Commerce Manchester, N
    The COLLEGIATE REVOLUTION SPECIAL EDITION - SPRING 1968 New Hampshire College of Accounting and Commerce Manchester, N. H. ENROLLMENT TOPS 1,000 14 STATES REPRESENTED Classes began September 18 with 1,009 students enrolled, the largest enrollment in the 34 year history of New Hampshire College. The 1,009 students represent 14 different states and 2 foreign countries, also the wid- est student representation the college has ever had. These figures, published by the Registrar's office, indicate the increas- ing influence of New Hampshire Col- lege over an ever-widening area. While at one time the state of New Hampshire contributed almost the en- tire enrollment of the college, it now only accounts for 54 per cent of the total. Massachusetts, with 18 per cent, is the next largest, and, sur- prisingly, New York State is third with 6 per cent. From here on state NEW LIBRARY GREETS STUDENTS representation is very close: Maine, A most welcome sight greeted stu- basement level, now being used for 5 per cent; Connecticut, 4 per cent; dents as they returned to classes this Vermont, 2 per cent; New Jersey, 2 storage, is available for future ex- fall: the new, modern brick, glass pansion. per cent; Rhode Island, 1 per cent; and aluminum facade of the college's Pennsylvania, 1 per cent. Mrs. Jordan is very proud of new library at 96 Hanover Street. her new library and is anxious to Foreign students include 2 from The library, built to accommodate show it off to visitors. She is partic- Germany and one from Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedford High School Exeter High School – William
    BEDFORD HIGH SCHOOL From the Intersection of Route 114 and Route 101 in Bedford • Follow Route 101 West to the blinking yellow light. • Turn left onto Nashua Road. • Bedford High School will be approximately 1/4 mile on your right. EXETER HIGH SCHOOL – WILLIAM BALL STADIUM 1 Blue Hawk Drive (for GPS use 315 Epping Road) • From North/West (Manchester Area) Route 101 East to Exit 8, Brentwood. At the top of the ramp turn left. Go over overpass to stop sign. At stop sign, turn right onto Route 27E/Epping Road. High School Entrance is 1.2 miles down on the left. Stadium is located behind the school. • From East (Portsmouth Area) Route 101 West to Exit 9, Route 27 Exeter. At the top of the ramp turn right. High School entrance will be a few miles down on right. Stadium is located behind the school. DARTMOUTH COLLEGE, HANOVER, NH From the Boston area (~2.5 hours): • Take I-93 north to I-89 north at Concord, N.H. • Get off I-89 at Exit 18 in Lebanon, N.H. onto Route 120. (A sign says that it is the exit for Dartmouth College.) • Bear right off the exit, heading north on Rt.120 into Hanover. • 4.1 miles from the exit, Rt. 120 forks at a traffic light. • Bear right at the fork, following Rt. 120 one-half mile on South Park Street to the second traffic light. • Turn left at the light, onto East Wheelock Street. • Follow East Wheelock for two-tenths of a mile, when you will come to the Hopkins Center (left) and the Dartmouth Green (right).
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Wednesday on Baseball Stadium, Hotel
    Meeting Wednesday on Baseball Stadium, Hotel February 17, 2003 By Katharine McQuaid, Union Leader Staff Aldermen will be asked to take some important steps towards bringing a baseball stadium, hotel, condominiums and other new development to Manchester's riverfront during a special meeting Wednesday, when they will also hear results of a ballpark feasibility study. "There's a variety of things they (aldermen) must approve based on an earlier memorandum of understanding," explained Bill Jabjiniak, Destination Manchester coordinator. "They've agreed that this stuff has to get done and this is the final copy of things to be approved." However, he said, these approvals do not guarantee the project. Aldermen later will be asked to bond $25 million for the construction of the minor league ballpark, expected to hold about 7,700 fans. "The big vote to make everything definite is the bond vote down the road," Jabjiniak said. But that step, which requires approval from 10 of the 14 aldermen, won't come unless the Boston Red Sox consent to the New Haven (Conn.) Ravens team relocation to Manchester. The Ravens is an affiliate of the Toronto Blue Jays. Mayor Robert Baines last night said he expects that decision to be made "soon." In the meantime, Baines and Jabjiniak are pleased an independent analysis by the firm Brailsford & Dunlavey, Inc., showed Manchester could support a Double A baseball team. Jabjiniak called the study "encouraging" and said it shows Manchester relates strongly with other baseball markets in the Eastern league and New England. The only negative point it identified, he said, was there are few large corporations headquartered in Manchester.
    [Show full text]
  • Mascot and Logo of the New Hampshire Fisher Cats
    [ Logo/Mascot Profile ] FFUU GGO Mascot and Logo of the NN New Hampshire Fisher Cats WHEN NEW HAMPSHIRE FIRST ANNOUNCED that their new team name would be the Primaries, it seemed perfectly befitting. The title encompassed the qualities that every Minor League Baseball team looks for—it captured the local tradition while gaining nationwide attention and popularity… Okay, so two out of three turned out to be true. Indeed the Primaries did an excellent job of capturing the heritage as New Hampshire does host the first presidential primaries every election year. However, the name was met with heated opposition by fans everywhere, especially in the Granite State. Ironically, it was only weeks before that an online poll had ranked the Primaries as top choice for the new team’s name. Intrigued by the simplicity, cleverness and sheer unique- ness of the idea, New Hampshire’s manage- ment ran with it. Logos of Uncle Sam with a baseball bat, and a donkey (for the Democrats) and an elephant (for the Republicans) with bats had already been created by the time the media got its hands on the new idea… and completely tore it apart. The predominant reason for opposition was that the name was not politically correct; there are many other smaller, independent parties that the donkey and elephant do not represent. Another argument was that the nickname had to be something tangible. All other minor league teams are animals, people, things and places—not one was named after a local event. To solve this unexpected debacle, the very demo- cratic system of a name-the-team contest was held with the top five finalists from previous online voting: the Granite State Mountain Men, the New Hampshire Granite, the Manchester Millers, the New Hampshire Fungo Fisher Cats, and—to many people’s dismay—the New Hampshire Primaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee on Baseball Minutes
    7/10/97 Mayor’s Baseball Adv. Cmte. 1 MAYOR’S BASEBALL ADVISORY COMMITTEE July 10, 1997 9:00 AM Chairman Keegan called the meeting to order. The Clerk called the roll. Present: Chairman Keegan, Alderman Shea, Joan Bennett, Guild “Bushy” Hill, Sean Thomas Messrs.: Mayor Wieczorek, Kevin Clougherty, Ron Ludwig, J. Schaufenbil Chairman Keegan stated a lot has happened since we last met and I think we have a number of teams interested in coming to Manchester and I don’t have question about the last team, Joe and Gerry the guy that runs his team down in New Briton. It seems that the main issue would be the requirement that this team and I’ve talked to a friend of mine down in Maryland who’s organization would also like to come, John Danais the General Manager down there, but they expect that the City and the State or certainly the area that they want to put their team into should provide the facility for their team and the requirements are a lot more than when the Yankees were here 23 years ago, a new stadium would cost somewhere around $10 million and then the question is, which we don’t know the answer to at this time, what would it cost to expand Gill Stadium to meet the qualifications that are required for a minor league time. The other issue on the table is would we consider an independent team or do we feel that a minor league team would be the only team that we would accept for Manchester, I think the interesting part is that all of the people I have talked to in every case, the State has supported the stadium along with New Briton, the State of Connecticut put up $6 million and New Briton put up $4 million and down in Maryland this other owner who has three different sites and in each case it has been a joint effort between the State and the City.
    [Show full text]