Visual Literacy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Visual Literacy english edition 2 2015 Visual Literacy issue editor KATARZYNA BOJARSKA KRZYSZTOF PIJARSKI “Realism,” Embodied Subjects, Projection of Empathy MARTA LEśNIAKOWSKA Experiencing Cultural Visualisations: the Anthropology of (re)Construction A D M MAZUR Negative Testimonials. Photographic Representation of Holocaust Memory PAWEł MOśCICKI Snapshots of Intimate Encounters teksty drugie · Institute of Literary Research Polish Academy of Science index 337412 · pl issn 0867-0633 EDITORIAL BOARD Agata Bielik-Robson (uk), Włodzimierz Bolecki, Maria Delaperrière (France), Ewa Domańska, Grzegorz Grochowski, Zdzisław Łapiński, Michał Paweł Markowski (usa), Maciej Maryl, Jakub Momro, Anna Nasiłowska (Deputy Editor-in-Chief), Leonard Neuger (Sweden), Ryszard Nycz (Editor-in-Chief), Bożena Shallcross (usa), Marta Zielińska, Tul’si Bhambry (English Translator and Language Consultant), Justyna Tabaszewska, Marta Bukowiecka (Managing Editor) ADVISORY BOARD Edward Balcerzan, Stanisław Barańczak (usa) , Małgorzata Czermińska, Paweł Dybel, Knut Andreas Grimstad (Norway), Jerzy Jarzębski, Bożena Karwowska (Canada), Krzysztof Kłosiński, Dorota Krawczyńska, Vladimir Krysinski (Canada), Luigi Marinelli (Italy), Arent van Nieukerken (Holland), Ewa Rewers, German Ritz (Switzerland), Henryk Siewierski (Brasil), Janusz Sławiński , Ewa Thompson (usa), Joanna Tokarska-Bakir, Tamara Trojanowska (Canada), Alois Woldan (Austria), Anna Zeidler-Janiszewska ADDRESS Nowy Świat 72, room. 1, 00-330 Warsaw, Poland phone +48 22 657 28 07, phone/fax +48 22 828 32 06 e-mail: [email protected] www.tekstydrugie.pl GRAPHIC DESIGN Marcin Hernas | tessera.org.pl EDITING AND Lynn Suh LANGUAGE CONSULTANT PROOFREADING Rafał Pawluk TYPESETTING Publishing House of the Institute of Literary Research, Polish Academy of Sciences This journal is funded by the Polish Minister of Science and Higher Education, through the “Programme for the Development of Humanities” for 2015 – 2017 english edition 2 2015 Institute of Literary Research Polish Academy of Science www.tekstydrugie.pl theory of literature · critique · interpretation „Pro Cultura Litteraria” Association 2 table of contents Visual Literacy introduction 5 KATARZYNA BOJARSKA Visual Literacy topo-graphies 13 ROMA SENDYKA Prism: Understanding Non-Sites of Memory 29 ELŻBIETA RYBICKA Maps: From Metaphor to Critical Topography 49 MARTA ZIELIŃSKA Romantics Plotted on Maps photo-graphy 55 MARIANNA MICHAŁOWSKA The Art of the Document: Photography and Trauma 70 ADAM MAZUR Negative Testimonials. Photographic Representation of Holocaust Memory 80 PAWEŁ MOŚCICKI Snapshots of Intimate Encounters 105 ADRIANNA ALKSNIN Augustine: Charcot’s Bunny reading art 123 AGNIESZKA REJNIAK-MAJEWSKA Image as a Situation: Tragedy, Subjectivity and Painting According to Barnett Newman 147 KRZYSZTOF PIJARSKI “Realism,” Embodied Subjects, Projection of Empathy 168 EWA TONIAK Grottger and His Shadow 191 ADAM DZIADEK Themerson and Schwitters 200 MAGDALENA POPIEL The Aesthetics of Caprice: In the Circle of Visualization looking awry 212 ANNA ZEIDLER-JANISZEWSKA Visual Culture Studies or an Anthropologically Oriented Bildwissenschaft?On the Directions of the Iconic Turn in the Cultural Sciences 236 LUIZA NADER An Affective Art History 262 LESZEK KOCZANOWICZ Magical Power of Art. Subject, Public Sphere, Emancipation 278 MARTA LEŚNIAKOWSKA Experiencing Cultural Visualisations: the Anthropology of (re-)Construction 295 GRZEGORZ GROCHOWSKI Where Codes Meet: On the Literary Uses of Iconic Signs Introduction Katarzyna Bojarska Visual Literacy DOI:10.18318/td.2015.en.2.1 Katarzyna Bojarska is an assistant professor in the Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, in the Department of the Research on Literature and Culture of Late Modernity. wenty years ago, in 1996, American academic journal Author of articles TOctober published a survey entitled “Visual Culture and translations Questionnaire.”1 Among the respondents were: Svetlana Alp- interested in the ers, Susan Buck-Morss, Jonathan Crary, Martin Jay, Stephen relations of art, Melville and others. The questions posed tackled several literature, history and psychoanalysis. topics including the shift from historical to anthropological Translated among thinking in the interdisciplinary model of visual culture stud- others Dominick ies; inspiration that visual culture scholars find in eccentric LaCapra’s book, art historians such as Aby Warburg and Alois Riegl; criticism History in Transit. of visual culture for concentrating on the disembodied im- Experience, Identity, Critical Theory age and thus producing ideal subjects for globalized turbo- (2009) and Susan capital; and the claim that the shift in academia (from the Buck-Morss’ Hegel, historical study of images under the umbrella of art history Haiti and Universal towards visual culture) parallels the shift in the art world (in History (2014). The brief, from modernist autonomous art object to postmodern- author of Wydarzenia po Wydarzeniu: ist art practices), while what follows would be the retreat of Białoszewski – critics who tend to find it more challenging and productive Richter – Spiegelman to discuss cultural artefacts in a broader context rather than [Events after the works of art per se.2 Event: Białoszewski – Richter – Spiegelman] (Warszawa 2013). Fulbright Fellow at 1 October, 77 (Summer, 1996): 25-70. Cornell University, 2 Ibid., 25. Ithaca NY (2009-2010). 6 visual literacy Susan Buck-Morss provided an account of how an attempt to institutionalize visual culture studies failed at Cornell University where she worked at the time, and how it was impossible to grasp, frame and change something which was more of a process (an interdisciplinary network of exchanges and encounters) into something that would be an academic discipline. She introduced a crucial problem, namely: “what would be the episteme … of such a field?”3 And even though she went on to name the set of theoreticians included in the reading lists of visual culture courses (Barthes-Benjamin-Foucault-Lacan) and the set of problems addressed (reproduc- tion of images, the society of the spectacle, scopic regimes, perceiving the Other, etc.), she concluded by saying that more than anything, images need to be read (sic!) “emblematically and symptomatically, in terms of the most fundamental questions of social life.”4 This for her means that visual culture is responsible for working out its own theories, ones that “themselves are visual, that show rather than argue.”5 Jonathan Crary, on the other hand, saw in the emergence and success of visual culture studies a response to the “collapse of certain enduring assumptions about the status of a spectator.”6 According to him, vision remains closely attached to more general historical questions dealing with the “construction of subjectivity.” Martin Jay on his part, seemed to have been convinced that visual art in the 20th century can no longer be separated (and as such studies in separation) from other images, from the conditions of their production, circulation and reception (an idea popular at least from the times of John Berger’s Ways of Seeing, from 1972).7 We seem to owe this meaningful shift to the pressures coming both from within 20th century art as well as from without. However, this lack of a single method, the call for new (visual) theories as well as the “threat” of anthropology (the threat of ignoring the historical order of things and their historical specificities), together with an overdose of the inter- and multi-disciplinary have made many suspicious of the status of this new interpretative mode, this new approach to visuality and culture more generally.8 As Nicholas Mirzoeff has rightly pointed out, like history visual culture is both the name of the academic field and that of its object of study. Visual culture involves the things that we see, the 3 Ibid., 29. 4 Ibid., 30 5 Ibid., 30. 6 Ibid., 33. 7 Ibid., 44. 8 See Visual Culture: Images and Interpretations, eds. Norman Bryson, Michael Ann Holly and Keith Moxey, (Hanover N.H.: University Press of New England, 1994). INTRODUCTION KATARZYNA BOJARSKA VISUAL LITERACY 7 mental model we all have of how to see, and what we can do as a result. That is why we call it visual culture: a culture of the visual.9 And it is precisely the proximity of history and the visual that proves crucial in thinking about Polish culture and the role images played in its transformation at the turn of 21st century. Why is it interesting and actually necessary to introduce this framework? Mostly because its inception can be dated to the very beginning of the 1990s and the birth of Polish democracy. At that time, people began to see themselves, their history and their current role in history differently (or at least many hoped that was the case). Moreover, in that cultural context, which was very strongly based on the word (especially the written word) and literature as records and expressions of collective sentiment and identity, the role of imagery (and visual arts alike) has for a long time been underestimated. And yet it seems that when it comes to the experience of Poland’s political transformation and the outcome of the fall of the Iron Curtain, together with all the accompanying identity, political and economic consequences, it is the visual (rather than liter- ary) culture that offers the big picture and one that is complicated. In the history of the 20th and 21th centuries, one finds numerous instances of both artist-as- -(art)theorists and artists engaged in digging deep
Recommended publications
  • Manifestopdf Cover2
    A Manifesto for the Book Sarah Bodman and Tom Sowden A Manifesto for the Book Sarah Bodman and Tom Sowden with an edited selection of interviews, essays and case studies from the project What will be the canon for the artist’s book in the 21st Century? 1 A Manifesto for the Book Published by Impact Press at The Centre for Fine Print Research University of the West of England, Bristol February 2010 Free download from: http://www.bookarts.uwe.ac.uk/canon.htm This publication is a result of a project funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council from March 2008 - February 2010: What will be the canon for the artist’s book in the 21st Century? The AHRC funds postgraduate training and research in the arts and humanities, from archaeology and English literature to design and dance. The quality and range of research supported not only provides social and cultural benefits but also contributes to the economic success of the UK. For further information on the AHRC, please see the website www.ahrc.ac.uk ISBN 978-1-906501-04-4 © 2010 Publication, Impact Press © 2010 Images, individual artists © 2010 Texts, individual authors Editors Sarah Bodman and Tom Sowden The views expressed within A Manifesto for the Book are not necessarily those of the editors or publisher. Impact Press, Centre for Fine Print Research UWE, Bristol School of Creative Arts Kennel Lodge Road, Bristol BS3 2JT United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 117 32 84915 Fax: +44 (0) 117 32 85865 www.bookarts.uwe.ac.uk [email protected] [email protected] 2 Contents Interview with Eriko Hirashima founder of LA LIBRERIA artists’ bookshop in Singapore 109 A Manifesto for the Book Sarah Bodman and Tom Sowden 5 Interview with John Risseeuw, proprietor of his own Cabbagehead Press and Director of ASU’s Pyracantha Interview with Radoslaw Nowakowski on publishing his own Press, Arizona State University, USA 113 books and artists’ books “non-describing the world” since the 70s in Dabrowa Dolna, Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sculpted Voice an Exploration of Voice in Sound Art
    The Sculpted Voice an exploration of voice in sound art Author: Olivia Louvel Institution: Digital Music and Sound Art. University of Brighton, U.K. Supervised by Dr Kersten Glandien 2019. Table of Contents 1- The plastic dimension of voice ................................................................................... 2 2- The spatialisation of voice .......................................................................................... 5 3- The extended voice in performing art ........................................................................16 4- Reclaiming the voice ................................................................................................20 Bibliography ....................................................................................................................22 List of audio-visual materials ............................................................................................26 List of works ....................................................................................................................27 List of figures...................................................................................................................28 Cover image: Barbara Hepworth, Pierced Form, 1931. Photographer Paul Laib ©Witt Library Courtauld Institute of Art London. 1 1- The plastic dimension of voice My practice is built upon a long-standing exploration of the voice, sung and spoken and its manipulation through digital technology. My interest lies in sculpting vocal sounds as a compositional
    [Show full text]
  • ABGABE Letztfassung IV
    DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit „Kunst basteln. Die Wurstserie von Fischli und Weiss im Kontext der Zürcher Szene 1979/80“ Verfasserin Simone Mathys-Parnreiter angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Philosophie (Mag. Phil.) Wien, 2010 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A315 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Kunstgeschichte Betreuer: Prof. Friedrich Teja Bach Thanks to the Walker Art Center, Minneapolis, for kindly providing me with photographic images of the Wurstserie . Dank an Bice Curiger für Ihre Zeit und ihr grosszügiges Zurverfügungstellen von Dokumentationsmaterial ihrer Ausstellung „Saus und Braus. Stadtkunst“ und Dank an Dora Imhof von der Universität Zürich für die Möglichkeit an Künstlerinterviews im Rahmen des Oral History Projektes teilzunehmen. 2 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS 1) EINLEITUNG .......................................................................................................................5 2) WURSTSERIE (1979) ..........................................................................................................8 2.1 Bricolage und Dilettantismus .......................................................................................28 2.2 Verortung im Gesamtwerk ...........................................................................................40 3) KONTEXT: ZÜRCHER SZENE 1979/1980 ....................................................................47 3.1 Punk und seine Bedeutung für Fischli/Weiss ..............................................................48 3.1.1 Das Projekt Migro (um 1980)
    [Show full text]
  • 'Kurt Schwitters in England', Baltic, No 4, Gateshea
    1 KURT SCHWITTERS IN ENGLAND, Sarah Wilson, Courtauld Institute of Art, ‘Kurt Schwitters in England', Baltic, no 4, Gateshead, np, 1999 (unfootnoted version); ‘Kurt Schwitters en Inglaterra el "Anglismo" o la dialéctica del exilio’, Kurt Schwitters, IVAM Centre Julio González, Valencia, pp. 318-335, 1995 ‘Kurt Schwitters en Angleterre’, Kurt Schwitters, retrospective, Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris, pp. 296-309 `ANGLISM': THE DIALECTICS OF EXILE' Three orthodoxies have dictated previous accounts of the life of Kurt Schwitters in England: that England was simply `exile', a cultural desert, that he was lonely, unappreciated, that his late figurative work is too embarrassing to be displayed in any authoritative retrospective. Scholars ask `What if?' What if Schwitters had got a passport to United States and had joined other artists in exile? He would have continued making Merz with American material. He would have had no `need' to paint figuratively.1 Would he have fitted his past into an even more `modernist' mould like his friend Naum Gabo, to please the New Yorkers?2 Surely not. `Emigration is the best school of dialectics' declared Bertold Brecht.3 Schwitters' last period must be investigated not in terms of `exile' but the dialectics of exile: as a future which cuts off a past which lives on through it all the more intensely in memory, repetition, recreation. `Exile' moreover is a purely negative term, foreclosing all the inspirational possibilities of a new `genius loci', a spirit of place: England. The Germany Schwitters knew was disfigured, disintegrating, self-destructing. His longing was for place which was no more. His Merzbau was destroyed by Allied bombing in 1943; Helma died in 1944: `Hanover a heap of ruins, Berlin destroyed, and you're not allowed to say how you feel.'4 The English period was a both a death and a birth, a question of identity through time, of new and old languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Biblioteca Di Studi Di Filologia Moderna – 37 –
    BIBLIOTECA DI STUDI DI FILOLOGIA MODERNA – 37 – DIPARTIMENTO DI LINGUE, LETTERATURE E STUDI INTERCULTURALI Università degli Studi di Firenze Coordinamento editoriale Fabrizia Baldissera, Fiorenzo Fantaccini, Ilaria Moschini Donatella Pallotti, Ernestina Pellegrini, Beatrice Töttössy BIBLIOTECA DI STUDI DI FILOLOGIA MODERNA Collana Open Access del Dipartimento di Lingue, Letterature e Studi Interculturali Direttore Beatrice Töttössy Comitato scientifico internazionale Enza Biagini (Professore Emerito), Nicholas Brownlees, Martha Canfield, Richard Allen Cave (Emeritus Professor, Royal Holloway, University of London), Piero Ceccucci, Massimo Ciaravolo (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia), John Denton, Anna Dolfi, Mario Domenichelli (Professore Emerito), Maria Teresa Fancelli (Professore Emerito), Massimo Fanfani, Fiorenzo Fantaccini (Università degli Studi di Firenze), Paul Geyer (Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn), Ingrid Hennemann, Sergej Akimovich Kibal’nik (Institute of Russian Literature [the Pushkin House], Russian Academy of Sciences; Saint-Petersburg State University), Ferenc Kiefer (Research Institute for Linguistics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences; Academia Europaea), Michela Landi, Murathan Mungan (scrittore), Stefania Pavan, Peter Por (CNRS Parigi), Gaetano Prampolini, Paola Pugliatti, Miguel Rojas Mix (Centro Extremeño de Estudios y Cooperación Iberoamericanos), Giampaolo Salvi (Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest), Ayşe Saraçgil, Rita Svandrlik, Angela Tarantino (Università degli Studi di Roma ‘La Sapienza’), Maria
    [Show full text]
  • Figurationen Des Porträts
    THIERRY GREUB UND MARTIN ROUSSEL (HRSG.) FIGURATIONEN DES PORTRÄTS MORPHOMATA Mit dem Fokus auf Figurationen des Porträts wird ein Spannungsfeld kulturellen Wissens eröffnet, anhand dessen sich der historische Bezugsraum von Artefakten diskutieren lässt. Porträt meint also nicht (nur) die kunsthistorische Gattung, sondern ein Wahrnehmungs­ modell, das sich zwischen einmaliger Ausprägung und der Wiedererkennbarkeit der Form entfaltet. Die Studien zielen in einem Bogen vom frühesten (Herrscher­) Porträt aus dem Alten Mesopotamien bis in die Gegen­ wartskunst hinein auf historisch variable Formen, individuelles Leben als besonders darzustellen. Neben genuin bild­ und skulpturorientierten Beiträgen von antiken Centauren­Porträts und Statuenbasen im kaiserzeitlichen Sagalassos über die ›Antike der Foto­ grafie‹ bis hin zu Schwitters’ Merzbild 9b und Twomblys Selbstbildnissen behandeln textorientierte Beiträge Fragen der Lesbarkeit von Porträts, etwa in apokryphen Paulus­Texten, an der Schnittstelle von biographischem Porträt und byzantinischer Philosophie oder anhand von Poes Oval Portrait. Ein eigener Fokus gilt den kul­ turellen Praktiken der Bedeutungsstiftung, von Stalins Herrscherbildnissen bis hin zur anthropologischen Funktion beispielsweise von Masken. GREUB, ROUSSEL (HRSG.) – FIGURATIONEN DES PORTRÄTS MORPHOMATA HERAUSGEGEBEN VON GÜNTER BLAMBERGER UND DIETRICH BOSCHUNG BAND 35 HERAUSGEGEBEN VON THIERRY GREUB UND MARTIN ROUSSEL FIGURATIONEN DES PORTRÄTS WILHELM FINK unter dem Förderkennzeichen 01UK1505. Die Verantwortung für den Inhalt der Veröffentlichung liegt bei den Autoren. Bibliografische Informationen der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek: Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen National­ bibliografie; detaillierte Daten sind im Internet über www.dnb.d­nb.de abrufbar. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Dieses Werk sowie einzelne Teile desselben sind urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung in anderen als den gesetzlich zugelassenen Fällen ist ohne vorherige schriftliche Zustimmung des Verlags nicht zulässig.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurt Schwitters •}}:{•}}}}}}}:•}:SS•}:•:•;•}:Ç ;.Y:}}}}}:{{{{.}}}}}}:S:+Fi' :•}%{: F.}};+.}
    Centre m Georges Pompidou Kurt Schwitters •}}:{•}}}}}}}:•}:SS•}:•:•;•}:ç ;.Y:}}}}}:{{{{.}}}}}}:S:+Fi' :•}%{: f.}};+.}. •vr:+r:4};;..,v,..'•,v,{•:^^ :: :{{¢}vv}:iGYry,.;}}titi;:.+,^.,.rfi:,{ :::•.:•ç%{}:•::~i :• :•iii\ j::{;}>:ti•}{:$ ;:;: ;}}:;:;:; ti '. .{' ,:•.'::::i•::t :; :i?•':.: : :, :? ;:,i::}''•i+• :i; :Y}<::: {:i}}>;.;{.:},,:•;:} ::5f?~,'~,s• .v .•,:++\•f/•~,vv.n . :{ v : vv}}}}}}:5.::.54;•}} ;:4:{•i}:4:h;•i::4:::;:{•}:• ; ::•}}}:•}i:•}}:rr .S•}} .nw,,.ïv;}:.;tr,{++}YAl}WŸ:.•?.~C•4Jn•.w+. :vv..vn:..~/•:{:4::}:•}:• :::iii}}}:•:i:•i:•:::~:•}: ::i$::.4•i:• (1887-1948) 24 nov. 1994 -2o fév. 1995 Rétrospective Grande Galerie 5e étage L'exposition bénéf de du concours du Ministère des Affaires étrangères d'Allemagne, du soutien de la SERCACEB et de la Fondation de la Caisse d'Epargne de Basse Saxe SOMMAIRE PRESENTATION GENERALE PAGE 3 L'EXPOSITION PAGE 4 LES MANIFESTATIONS AUTOUR DE L'EXPOSITION PAGE 10 LES PUBLICATIONS PAGE 15 LA COMMUNICATION DE L'EXPOSITION PAGE 18 RENSEIGNEMENTS_ PRATIQUES PAGE 19 PRESENTATION GENERALE UNE EXPOSITION Enfin à Paris ! Du 24 novembre 1994 au 20 février 1995, Kurt Schwitters (1887-1948) est présent au Centre Georges Pompidou à travers une importante rétrospective, la première jamais consacrée à cet artiste en France . La dernière rétrospective avait eu lieu il y a près de 10 ans, en 1985, au Museum of modem art (New York), à la Tate Gallery (Londres) et au Sprengel Museum (Hanovre). Conçue par Serge Lemoine, conservateur en chef du Musée de Grenoble et professeur à la Sorbonne, cette exposition permet de découvrir un créateur que l'on s'accorde aujourd'hui à considèrer comme l'un des maîtres du XXème siècle, à l'égal de Duchamp, Matisse ou Picasso.
    [Show full text]
  • Themerson and Schwitters 191
    READING ART ADAM DZIADEK THEMERSON AND SCHWITTERS 191 Adam Dziadek Themerson and Schwitters DOI:io.i83i 8/td.2o i5.en.2.i2 Adam Dziadek is a professor a t the University of Silesiam and the author o f Rytm i podmiot w liryce Jarosława Iwaszkiewicza i Aleksandra Wata Milton, Themerson and Schwitters (1999), Obrazy i wiersze. Z zagadnień To begin with, a quotation: interferencji sztuk w polskiej poezji This neglect then of rime so little is to be taken for współczesnej (2004), a defect, though it may seem so perhaps to vulgar Na marginesach readers, that it rather is to be esteemed an example lektury. Szkice teoretyczne (2006), set, the first in English, of ancient liberty recovered Projekt krytyki to heroic poem from the troublesome and modern somatycznej (2014). bondage of riming.1 He has published Wybór wierszy This passage comes from John Miltons Paradise Lost, Aleksandra Wata (2008) as a part of the but what could such a quotation have to do with Stefan Biblioteka Narodowa Themerson and Kurt Schwitters? What could Milton, series. With Jan Schwitters and Themerson possibly have in common? Zieliński, he recently “Common sense” would suggest that this is a funda- co-edited the mentally wrong juxtaposition. But this strange juxta- heretofore unedited Notatniki Aleksandra position is only partly guided by chance, while “com­ Wata (2015). He mon sense” itself, as rightly noted by Roland Barthes in has translated the Mythologies, is a thoroughly bourgeois term, and there- works of R. Barthes, fore, I would suggest, unworthy of being stooped to or J. Derrida, J.-L.
    [Show full text]
  • An Anna Blume’ Cole Collins
    ‘Anna Blume hat ein Vogel’: Madness and Identity Politics in ‘An Anna Blume’ Cole Collins For Schwitters, identity was never absolute but contextually determined: it could always be reconfigured, and, indeed, it became the task of his work to make this “law” manifest. Megan Luke Manifestations of Anna Blume The elusive figure of Anna Blume has remained mystifying to artists and critics alike as they wrestle with the complicated and obscure figuration of Schwitters’ most fa- mous character. Many have made attempts to understand her, to contextualise her, to give her historical significance, and have made multiple offerings with varying de- grees of plausibility. This essay seeks to consider the literary, artistic and critical perspectives which focus on Anna Blume, and then to consider how we might take studies of Anna Blume further. “An Anna Blume” was first published in 1919 in Der Sturm (Volume 10, Issue 5, 10 August). It was later picked up by Paul Steegemann Verlag, Hannover, and pro- duced in Anna Blume. Dichtungen.1 As well as these literary forms, Anna’s name ap- peared in this first year as a collage (Das Kreuz des Erlösers), a Stempelbild [a stamp picture] and a watercolour. In the same year, she appeared in the dedication of a drawing that was reproduced in the December issue of Der Zweeman as An Anna Blume, die Berühmte [To Anna Blume, the Famous].2 In 1920, the poem was printed as a poster [Plakat] in the style of a public information announcement. Wrapped in a red border, evoking the red dress she wears, ‘An Anna Blume’ was printed in Frak- tur font, and plastered around Hannover for all to read.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter 6ce, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Ifigher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Infonnation Compaoy 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 MODERNISM BETWEEN EAST AND WEST: THE HUNGARIAN JOURNAL MA (1916-1925) AND THE INTERNATIONAL AVANT-GARDE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Marian Mazzone, B.A., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Dafyddjones-Editor Dadaculture
    &#&#%7.674' %4+6+%#.6':65 106*'#8#06)#4&' AVANT-GARDE CRITICAL STUDIES 18 Editor Klaus Beekman Associate Editors Sophie Berrebi, Ben Rebel, Jan de Vries, Willem G. Weststeijn International Advisory Board Henri Béhar, Hubert van den Berg, Peter Bürger, Ralf Grüttemeier, Hilde Heinen, Leigh Landy Founding Editor Fernand Drijkoningen† &#&#%7.674' %4+6+%#.6':65 106*'#8#06)#4&' 'FKVGFD[ &CH[FF,QPGU $PVWHUGDP1HZ<RUN1< &RYHULPDJH7LP/RQJ &RYHUGHVLJQ$DUW-DQ%HUJVKRHII $OOWLWOHVLQWKH$YDQW*DUGH&ULWLFDO6WXGLHVVHULHV IURPRQZDUGV DUH DYDLODEOHWRGRZQORDGIURPWKH,QJHQWDZHEVLWHKWWSZZZLQJHQWDFRP 7KHSDSHURQZKLFKWKLVERRNLVSULQWHGPHHWVWKHUHTXLUHPHQWVRI³,62 ,QIRUPDWLRQDQGGRFXPHQWDWLRQ3DSHUIRUGRFXPHQWV 5HTXLUHPHQWVIRUSHUPDQHQFH´ ,6%1 (GLWLRQV5RGRSL%9$PVWHUGDP1HZ<RUN1< 3ULQWHGLQ7KH1HWKHUODQGV CONTENTS Short preface 7 Introduction: der Holzweg der Holzwege 9 I. Manifestos and Evenings at the Cabaret Voltaire Cornelius Partsch The Mysterious Moment: early Dada performance as ritual 37 John Wall and Dafydd Jones The Body of the Voice: corporeal poetics in Dada 66 II. Dada and Language T. J. Demos The Language of “Expatriation” 91 Anna Katharina Schaffner Assaulting the Order of Signs 117 III. Dada Siegt! Martin Ignatius Gaughan The Prosthetic Body in Early Modernism: Dada’s anti-humanist humanism 137 Curt Germundson Montage and Totality: Kurt Schwitters’s relationship to “tradition” and “avant-garde” 156 IV. Thinkers on Stage Stephen C. Foster The Mortality of Roles: Johannes Baader and spiritual materialism 187 Dafydd Jones To Be or Not To Be ... Arthur Cravan: subject, surface and difference 200 V. Philosophy, Theory and the Avant-Garde Joel Freeman Ernst Bloch and Hugo Ball: toward an ontology of the avant-garde 225 David Cunningham Making an Example of Duchamp: history, theory, and the question of the avant-garde 254 VI.
    [Show full text]
  • Readings: War Poetry and Dada
    017_War-Poetry_Dada.doc READINGS: WAR POETRY AND DADA Background Various war poems Erich Maria Remarque, All Quiet on the Western Front Background: Eugen Weber, Dada Tzara, Dada Manifesto Tzara, "Lecture on Dada" Interpretations of Duchamp, The Bride Stripped Bare… GROVEART.COM DADAISM Artistic and literary movement launched in Zurich in 1916 but shared by independent groups in New York, Berlin, Paris and elsewhere. The Dadaists channelled their revulsion at World War I into an indictment of the nationalist and materialist values that had brought it about. They were united not by a common style but by a rejection of conventions in art and thought, seeking through their unorthodox techniques, performances and provocations to shock society into self-awareness. The name Dada itself was typical of the movement’s anti- rationalism. Various members of the Zurich group are credited with the invention of the name; according to one account it was selected by the insertion of a knife into a dictionary, and was retained for its multilingual, childish and nonsensical connotations. The Zurich group was formed around the poets hugo Ball, Emmy Hennings, tristan Tzara and richard Huelsenbeck, and the painters hans Arp, marcel Janco and hans Richter. The term was subsequently adopted in New York by the group that had formed around marcel Duchamp, francis Picabia, Marius de Zayas (1880–1961) and Man ray. The largest of several German groups was formed in Berlin by Huelsenbeck with john Heartfield, raoul Hausmann, hannah Höch and george Grosz. As well as important centres elsewhere (Barcelona, Cologne and Hannover), a prominent post-war Parisian group was promoted by Tzara, Picabia and andré Breton.
    [Show full text]