DOCSLIB.ORG

Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine EUA FDA Review Memorandum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine EUA FDA Review Memorandum Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for an Unapproved Product Review Memorandum Identifying Information Application Type EUA (Event-driven EUA request) Application Number 27205 Sponsor Janssen Biotech, Inc. Submission Date February 4, 2021 Receipt Date February 4, 2021 Signatory Authority Marion F. Gruber, Ph.D., Director, CBER/OVRR Principal Discipline Reviewers Sudhakar Agnihothram, Ph.D., Committee chair, OVRR/DVRPA; from the Review Team Bharat Khurana, DVM, Ph.D., MBA, Regulatory Project Manager, OVRR/DVRPA; Rachel Zhang, M.D., Clinical reviewer, OVRR/DVRPA; Yosefa Hefter, M.D., Clinical reviewer, OVRR/DVRPA; Claudia Wrzesinski, Ph.D., Toxicology reviewer, OVRR/DVRPA; Ye Yang, Ph.D., Biostatistics reviewer, OBE/DB; Lei Huang, Ph.D., Biostatistics reviewer, OBE/DB; Marian Major, Ph.D., CMC/Product reviewer, OVRR/DVP; Alla Kachko, Ph.D., CMC/Product reviewer, OVRR/DVP; Pankaj (Pete) Amin, B.S., CMC/Facility reviewer; OCBQ/DMPQ; Holly Brevig, Ph.D., CMC/Facility reviewer; OCBQ/DMPQ; Jane Woo, M.D., Pharmacovigilance reviewer, OBE/DE; Brenda Baldwin, Ph.D., Data Integrity reviewer, OVRR/DVRPA; Haecin Chun, M.S., BIMO reviewer, OCBQ/DIS/BMB; Bhanu Kannan, M.S., BIMO reviewer, OCBQ/DIS/BMB; Oluchi Elekwachi, Pharm.D., MPH, Labeling reviewer, OCBQ/DCM/APLB Review Completion Date February 27, 2021 Established Name/Other names Janssen COVID-19 vaccine (Ad26.COV2.S) used during development Dosage Forms/Strengths and A 0.5 mL suspension administered as a single intramuscular Route of Administration injection at the dose level of 5×1010 virus particles (vp) Intended Use for EUA Active immunization to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Intended Population Individuals 18 years of age and older Janssen Ad26.COV2.S (COVID-19) Vaccine VRBPAC Briefing Document Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... 4 Glossary ........................................................................................................................................ 5 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 6 2. Background .............................................................................................................................. 8 2.1 SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic .................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Available Vaccines and Therapies for COVID-19 ............................................................. 9 2.3 EUA Request for the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine ........................................................... 9 2.4 U.S. Requirements to Support Issuance of an EUA for a Biological Product ............................................................................................................................ 10 2.5 Applicable Guidance for Industry .................................................................................... 11 3. Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine .................................................................................................. 12 3.1 Vaccine Composition, Dosing Regimen .......................................................................... 12 3.2 Safety Experience of Ad26-based Vaccines ................................................................... 13 3.3 Proposed Use Under EUA .............................................................................................. 13 4. FDA Review of Clinical Safety and Effectiveness Data ......................................................... 13 4.1 Overview of Clinical Studies ............................................................................................ 13 4.2 Study 3001 ...................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.1 Design ..................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.2 Compliance with Good Clinical Practice ................................................................. 18 4.2.3 FDA Assessment of Phase 3 Follow-Up Duration .................................................. 18 4.2.4 Participant Disposition and Inclusion in Analysis Populations ................................ 19 4.2.5 Demographics and Other Baseline Characteristics ................................................ 20 4.2.6 Vaccine Efficacy ...................................................................................................... 25 4.2.7 Safety ...................................................................................................................... 39 5. FDA Review of Other Information Submitted in Support of the EUA ..................................... 54 5.1 Sponsor’s Plans for Continuing Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Follow-up ......................... 54 5.2 Pharmacovigilance Activities ........................................................................................... 55 5.3 Non-Clinical Studies ........................................................................................................ 56 5.4 Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control (CMC) Information ............................................ 57 5.5 Clinical Assay Information ............................................................................................... 58 5.6 Inspections of Clinical Study Sites .................................................................................. 58 5.7 EUA Prescribing Information and Fact Sheets ................................................................ 59 6. Benefit/Risk Assessment in the Context of Proposed Indication and Use Under EUA .................................................................................................................................. 59 6.1 Known Benefits ............................................................................................................... 59 6.2 Unknown Benefits/Data Gaps ......................................................................................... 59 6.3 Known Risks ................................................................................................................... 61 6.4 Unknown Risks/Data Gaps ............................................................................................. 61 2 Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine Emergency Use Authorization Review Memorandum 7. VRBPAC Meeting Summary .................................................................................................. 62 8. Overall Summary and Recommendation ............................................................................... 63 9. References ............................................................................................................................ 65 10. Appendix A. Other Clinical Studies Ad26.COV2.S ................................................................ 67 11. Appendix B. Case Definitions for Mild COVID-19 and FDA Harmonized COVID-19 ................................................................................................................................... 69 List of Tables Table 1. Clinical Trials Submitted in Support of Efficacy and Safety Determinations of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine ............................................................................................... 13 Table 2. Analysis Populations ..................................................................................................... 17 Table 3. Participant Disposition by Age Group and Comorbidities, Full Analysis Set, Study 3001 .......................................................................................................................... 18 Table 4. Dispositiona, Efficacy Analysis Population, Study 3001 ................................................ 19 Table 5. Disposition, Safety Analysis Population, Study 3001 .................................................... 20 Table 6. Demographic Characteristics, Per-Protocol Set, Study 3001 ....................................... 21 Table 7. Demographic Characteristics, Full Analysis Set, Study 3001 ....................................... 22 Table 8. Participants With Comorbidities, Full Analysis Set, Study 3001 ................................... 23 Table 9. Demographic Characteristics, Safety Subset, Study 3001 ........................................... 24 Table 10. Vaccine Efficacy Against Centrally Confirmed Moderate to Severe/Critical COVID-19 With Onset at Least 14 and at Least 28 Days After Vaccination, Per- Protocol Set, Study 3001 .................................................................................................... 25 Table 11. Demographic Characteristics of Participants With Moderate to Severe/Critical COVID-19, Including Non-centrally Confirmed Cases, With Onset at Least 14 days After Vaccination, Per-Protocol Set .................................................................................... 26 Table 12. Vaccine Efficacy of First Occurrence of Moderate to Severe/Critical COVID-19, Including Non-centrally Confirmed Cases, With Onset at Least 14 or at Least 28 Days After Vaccination, by Demographic Characteristics, Per-Protocol Set, Study 3001 ........... 27 Table 13. Vaccine Efficacy of First
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Faqs on COVID-19 Vaccine
    COVID-19 Frequently Asked Questions COVID-19 Vaccines About COVID-19 Vaccines Q: Why is a COVID-19 vaccine needed if social distancing and wearing masks prevent the COVID-19 virus from spreading? A: Vaccines boost your immune system, so it will be ready to fight the virus if you are exposed. Vaccination combined with ongoing prevention efforts including wearing face masks that cover the mouth and nose, frequent hand washing and staying at least 6 feet away from others offer the best protection against COVID-19. Q: How many COVID-19 vaccines are available? Which one should I get? A: In the United States, three COVID-19 vaccines have been granted emergency use authorization (EUA) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and recommended for use by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). These vaccines, manufactured by Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), have all been proven safe and effective at preventing serious illness, hospitalization, and death from COVID-19 disease. The CDC recommends getting the first vaccine available to you for protection from COVID-19. While vaccine supply is limited, individuals likely will not get to choose which vaccine to receive, and will be given what is available from their vaccine provider at the time they receive their immunization. Q: Are all of the COVID-19 vaccines effective? A: Yes. COVID-19 vaccines from Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) have been approved for emergency use by the FDA, and recommended for use by the CDC after a rigorous analysis proved their effectiveness. During studies, all the vaccines were shown to prevent serious illness from COVID-19 at high effectiveness rates.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT 2015 MARCH 2016 TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS ALEX GORSKY Chairman, Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer This year at Johnson & Johnson, we are proud this aligned with our values. Our Board of WRITTEN OVER to celebrate 130 years of helping people Directors engages in a formal review of 70 YEARS AGO, everywhere live longer, healthier and happier our strategic plans, and provides regular OUR CREDO lives. As I reflect on our heritage and consider guidance to ensure our strategy will continue UNITES & our future, I am optimistic and confident in the creating better outcomes for the patients INSPIRES THE long-term potential for our business. and customers we serve, while also creating EMPLOYEES long-term value for our shareholders. OF JOHNSON We manage our business using a strategic & JOHNSON. framework that begins with Our Credo. Written OUR STRATEGIES ARE BASED ON over 70 years ago, it unites and inspires the OUR BROAD AND DEEP KNOWLEDGE employees of Johnson & Johnson. It reminds OF THE HEALTH CARE LANDSCAPE us that our first responsibility is to the patients, IN WHICH WE OPERATE. customers and health care professionals who For 130 years, our company has been use our products, and it compels us to deliver driving breakthrough innovation in health on our responsibilities to our employees, care – from revolutionizing wound care in communities and shareholders. the 1880s to developing cures, vaccines and treatments for some of today’s most Our strategic framework positions us well pressing diseases in the world. We are acutely to continue our leadership in the markets in aware of the need to evaluate our business which we compete through a set of strategic against the changing health care environment principles: we are broadly based in human and to challenge ourselves based on the health care, our focus is on managing for the results we deliver.
    [Show full text]
  • Research & Development of Vaccines to Prevent SARS-Cov2 Infection
    Monthly update Research & development of vaccines to prevent SARS-coV2 infection Updated May 2021 Disclaimer No vaccine against COVID-19 is approved. This document does not provide guidance on what vaccine or medicines to take. Please avoid self-prescription and always refer to your doctor before making any treatment decision. This document provides a selection of updates on the research and development of vaccines for the current coronavirus infection. Those highlights are for the information of patient organisations/ groups, advocates and people living with a rare disease. EURORDIS takes reasonable steps to verify the accuracy of the information presented. This document does not constitute, and shall not be deemed or construed as, any approval or endorsement by EURORDIS of such product or entity. Updated May 2021 Contents (click to navigate in document) A ‘must-read’ introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Resources ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Vaccines in development ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Immunization Site Pain: Case Definition and Guidelines for Collection, Analysis
    Vaccine 30 (2012) 4558–4577 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Vaccine j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/vaccine Immunization site pain: Case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis, ଝ and presentation of immunization safety data a,∗ b c d e Jane F. Gidudu , Gary A. Walco , Anna Taddio , William T. Zempsky , Scott A. Halperin , a f g h i Angela Calugar , Neville A. Gibbs , Renald Hennig , Milivoj Jovancevic , Eva Netterlid , j k l,1 m n Terri O’Connor , James M. Oleske , Frederick Varricchio , Theodore F. Tsai , Harry Seifert , n 2 Anne E. Schuind , The Brighton Immunization Site Pain Working Group a Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA b Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA c Division of Clinical, Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Leslie L. Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto and Child Health Evaluative Sciences, the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada d Division of Pain and Palliative Medicine, Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Connecticut, USA e Department of Pediatrics and Microbiology & Immunology, Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Canadian Center for Vaccinology Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada f Division of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Rheumatology Products, Food and Drug Administration, USA g Scratch GbR, Pharmacovigilance Services, Butzbach, Germany h University
    [Show full text]
  • Notice Under S66 of the Commerce Act 1986 Application by Johnson & Johnson to Acquire the Stock, Assets and Business Of
    PUBLIC COPY Notice under s66 of the Commerce Act 1986 Application by Johnson & Johnson to acquire the stock, assets and business of the Consumer Healthcare division of Pfizer Inc. COMMERCE ACT 1986: BUSINESS ACQUISITION SECTION 66: NOTICE SEEKING CLEARANCE 28 September 2006 The Registrar Business Acquisitions and Authorisations Commerce Commission PO Box 2351 Wellington Pursuant to s66(1) of the Commerce Act 1986 notice is hereby given seeking clearance of a proposed business acquisition. 518689_1.DOC 2 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PART 1: TRANSACTION DETAILS 1 The business acquisition for which clearance is sought 2 The person giving this notice 3 Confidentiality 4 Participants 5 Interconnected and associated persons 6 Beneficial interests 7 Links between participants 8 Common directorships 9 Business activities of the participants 10 Reasons for the proposed acquisition PART II: IDENTIFICATION OF MARKETS AFFECTED 11 Horizontal aggregation 12 Differentiated product markets 13 Differentiated product markets 14 Vertical integration 15 Other business acquisitions PARTS III, IV AND V: CONSTRAINTS ON MARKET POWERS BY EXISTING AND POTENTIAL COMPETITION AND OTHER POTENTIAL CONSTRAINTS 16 Allergy medication 17 Products for the treatment of worms 18 Thrush treatment CERTIFICATE APPENDICES 1. Heartburn and indigestion remedies (MYLANTA and MOTILIUM) 2. Worm treatments (COMBANTRIN, VERMOX) 3. Cold, flu, nasal decongestant, cough relief and sort throat medications (CODRAL, SINUTAB, SUDAFED, BENADRYL, BRONDECON) 4. Allergy relief products (ACTIFED, SINUTAB, SUDAFED, VISINE, LIVOSTIN) 518689_1.DOC 3 5. Thrush treatments (DIFLUCAN ONE, DAKTARIN, DAKTAGOLD, NIZORAL, SPORANOX) 6. Shampoo (PREGAINE, ROGAINE, NEUTROGENA, JOHNSON’S BABY SHAMPOO) 7. Hand hygiene (PURELL and MICRO SHIELD) 8. Competitor worm treatment products 9. Multinational pharmaceutical businesses: GlaxoSmithKline, Douglas Pharmaceuticals, Alphapharm, Bayer Group 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Johnson & Johnson's Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine Info
    Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine: Is It Efficacious? Purpose There has been observed brand hesitancy between the Johnson & Johnson Janssen COVID-19 vaccine as compared to the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccine where individuals have expressed concerns over disparities in efficacy. This likely stems from the blanket efficacy statements reported in media outlets where the Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine reports an efficacy of 72% compared to 94% & 95% for Moderna and Pfizer respectively. The purpose of this info-bite is to clarify the concerns over efficacy so we can reassure our patients that all three vaccination options are efficacious and safe. The goal is to reduce vaccine brand hesitancy, as it may lead to a delay in vaccination, which may put our patients at risk. Is the Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen vaccine efficacious? Yes, the Johnson & Johnson Janssen vaccine has proven efficacy. Its reportedly 100% efficacious against death due to COVID-19 AND prevention against hospitalization. Additionally, it is potentially effective against variant strains as it maintained high efficacy against severe disease (73-82%) across world regions. The 72% efficacy often noted includes prevention of mild & moderate disease; it is unclear at this time how efficacious the vaccine is against mild & moderate disease. Is the Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen vaccine less efficacious than the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine? There is no evidence to claim that any of the three vaccines available are more efficacious than another. None of these vaccines have been compared in a head-to-head trial. Additionally, since the vaccine trials were tested at different times and locations, it further reduces one’s ability to claim one is better than the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Swiss Biotech Report – "Agility, Leadership and Innovation in the Time of COVID-19” – Is Indeed Appropriate
    SwissSwiss BiotechBiotech ReportReport 2021 2019Agility, leadership and innovation in the time of COVID-19 Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft Confédération suisse Confederazione Svizzera Confederaziun svizra Swiss Confederation Innosuisse – Swiss Innovation Agency “The biopharma industry’s response to COVID-19 has truly been a global one – with Swiss companies and academic institutions at the forefront. Swiss-based biopharma players are contributing across the spectrum of patient needs.” George Scangos | Vir Biotechnology, Inc. “2020 was the best year ever for Swiss biotech in relation to financing activities, with a total of approximately CHF 3.4B raised” Jürg Zürcher | GSA Biotechnology Leader, EY “Compared to 2019, trading volumes rose sharply by 177% and the total free float market capitalization of all SIX-listed biotech companies was up 30% on 2020.” Fabian Gerber | SIX Agility, leadership and innovation in the time of COVID-19 “Technologies developed by scientists in Switzerland have been crucial in the fight against COVID-19, including cloning the virus, cryo electron microscopy to visualize the spike proteins, and the use of radioactive molecules that bind to receptor proteins to investigate how the virus enters the host.” Florian Fisch | Swiss National Science Foundation “On May 1 2020, Moderna and Lonza announced a strategic collaboration to enable manufacturing of up to 1 billion doses of the vaccine per year. Lonza acquired equipment and built the production lines in just 8 months.” Jan Lucht | scienceindustries “Industrial
    [Show full text]
  • Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine Storage and Handling Summary
    Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine (Johnson & Johnson) Storage and Handling Summary Basics Store vaccine in a refrigerator. See guidance below for further details. Check and record storage unit temperatures each workday. See guidance below for each type of temperature monitoring device. Save storage records for 3 years, unless your jurisdiction requires a longer time period. Deliveries Vaccine 1. The vaccine will arrive in a 2° to 8°C (36°F and 46°F) qualified shipping container. 2. Examine the shipment for signs of damage. 3. As a backup to the qualified shipping container, temperature monitors are placed in each shipment. Janssen vaccines may include thawed and frozen/partially frozen vaccines and due to this, only warm monitors will be included in Janssen shipments. 4. Remove the instruction card for the temperature monitor immediately. Follow the guide on the back of the card to read the monitor. 5. The expiration date is NOT printed on the vaccine vial or carton. To determine the expiration date: Scan the QR code on the outer carton, or Call 1-800-565-4008, or Visit www.vaxcheck.jnj. Write the expiration date on the carton. Ancillary Supply Kit An ancillary supply kit will be provided and includes enough supplies to administer 100 doses of vaccine. Administration supplies include needles, syringes, sterile alcohol prep pads, vaccination record cards (shot cards), and some PPE. The kit is delivered separately from the vaccine. Unpack the kit and check for receipt of the correct administration supplies and quantities. 1 08/24/2021 CS322139-C Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine (Johnson & Johnson) Storage and Handling Summary Refrigerator Storage CDC recommends storing vaccine between 2°C and Do not freeze.
    [Show full text]
  • Laws of Trinidad and Tobago Ministry of Legal Affairs
    LAWS OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO MINISTRY OF LEGAL AFFAIRS www.legalaffairs.gov.tt FOOD AND DRUGS ACT CHAPTER 30:01 Act 8 of 1960 Amended by 39 of 1968 156/1972 *31 of 1980 16 of 1986 12 of 1987 6 of 1993 16 of 1998 6 of 2005 *See Note on Validation at page 2 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised (inclusive) by L.R.O. 1–2 .. 3–20 .. 21–245 .. UNOFFICIAL VERSION L.R.O. UPDATED TO DECEMBER 31ST 2014 LAWS OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO MINISTRY OF LEGAL AFFAIRS www.legalaffairs.gov.tt 2 Chap. 30:01 Food and Drugs Index of Subsidiary Legislation Page Food and Drugs Regulations (GN 130/1964) … … … … 25 Official Method Notification (GN 54/1972) … … … … 124 *Approval of New Drugs Notification … … … … … 129 †Withdrawal of Approval of New Drugs Notification (GN 51/1969) … … 200 Fish and Fishery Products Regulations (LN 220/1998)…………201 †This Notification (i.e. 51/1969) has been amended by LNs 99 and 114/1984 which have been omitted. *Note on Approval of New Drugs Notification The list of new drugs set out in the Schedule to this Notification has been consolidated as at 31st December 1977. This list is so voluminous and changes to it so frequent that, especially in view of its very limited use by the general public, it is not practicable to update it annually. The references to the amendments to this list since 31st December 1977 are contained in the Current Consolidated Index of Acts and Subsidiary Legislation. †Note on Withdrawal of Approval of New Drugs Notification For references to the Withdrawal of Approval of New Drugs Notifications subsequent to the year 1969 — See the current Consolidated Index of Acts and Subsidiary Legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT 2016 MARCH 2017 TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS ALEX GORSKY Chairman and Chief Executive Officer I’ve worked in the health care industry for Rather, true innovations are the result of WE ARE UNITED nearly 30 years. It’s been both an honor and collaboration. And that collaboration is AND INSPIRED a privilege to work for Johnson & Johnson, driven by a diversity of ideas, individuals BY OUR CREDO, a company that touches the lives of over and disciplines – working together toward WHICH RINGS a billion people every day, around the a common goal. AS TRUE TODAY world. As I look at today’s health care AS IT DID WHEN landscape, it’s incredibly clear that the Today, more than ever, the world needs IT WAS WRITTEN pace of change has never been greater, leaders who are committed to working MORE THAN 70 or frankly, more exciting. together to help bring improved health YEARS AGO. and wellness to every person in every Today’s rapid change brings both corner of the globe. As the world’s largest opportunities and risks for any company and most broadly based health care in health care, and we are prepared company, we are uniquely positioned to help to address both. There are significant transform global health care; to shine a light challenges to overcome, but the tools, the on the most important issues we are facing; insights, the technologies, the innovations to collaborate across boundaries and – both evolutions and revolutions – all borders; to uncover scientific insights and combine to make today one of the most ideas; and to dedicate resources towards promising times for human health and for creating tomorrow’s breakthroughs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enduring Paradox of Products Liability Law Relating to Prescription Pharmaceuticals
    Pace Law Review Volume 21 Issue 2 Spring 2001 Article 1 April 2001 The Enduring Paradox of Products Liability Law Relating to Prescription Pharmaceuticals M. Stuart Madden Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr Recommended Citation M. Stuart Madden, The Enduring Paradox of Products Liability Law Relating to Prescription Pharmaceuticals, 21 Pace L. Rev. 313 (2001) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr/vol21/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PACE LAW REVIEW Volume 21 Spring 2001 Number 2 Article The Enduring Paradox of Products Liability Law Relating to Prescription Pharmaceuticals M. Stuart Madden* Table of Contents I. Introduction ....................................... 314 II. Restatement Second, Torts § 402 A and Restatement Third, Torts: ProductsLiability ...... 317 A. Approaches Generally .......................... 317 III. Restatement Second, Torts § 402A comment k- Unavoidably Unsafe Products ..................... 321 A. PrescriptionPharmaceuticals .................. 322 B. Blood or Biological Products ................... 324 IV. Restatement Third, Torts: Products Liability § 6... 326 A. Warnings and Instructions-Generally......... 328 1. To Whom Warnings Must Be Given- Generally .................................. 330 * Charles A. Frueauff Professor and Distinguished Professor of Law, Pace University School of Law. 313 1 314 PACE LAW REVIEW [Vol. 21:313 B. Products Liability Restatement § 6 (d)(1) and (2 ) .................................. .......... 33 7 C. The Adequacy of Warnings and Instructions ... 340 D. Inadequate Warnings or Instructions and Causation...................................... 343 E. IntergenerationalHarm ........................ 348 F. Liability of Pharmacistsand Pharmaceutical Distributors ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Jordan Report 20Th Anniversary: Accelerated Development Of
    USA ES IC V R E S N A M U H & D H H E T P L A A R E T H M F F E N O T Accelerated Development of Vaccines Preface In 1982, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Dis­ Along with these technological advances, there has been a eases (NIAID) established the Program for the Accelerated heightened awareness of the importance of vaccines for global Development of Vaccines. For 20 years, this program has helped health and security. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome stimulate the energy, intellect, and ability of scientists in micro­ (AIDS), malaria, and tuberculosis have demonstrated to the biology, immunology, and infectious diseases. Vaccine research world the importance of public health in economic development. has certainly benefited. The status report reflecting this Most recently, the threat of bioterrorism has reminded many progress in vaccine research has come to be known as the Jor­ Americans of the value of vaccines as public health tools. dan Report in recognition of Dr. William Jordan, past director of NIAID’s Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Articles by outside experts in this edition highlight many of the (DMID) and the program’s earliest advocate. scientific advances, challenges, and issues of vaccine research during these two decades. As we look to the decade ahead, the This anniversary edition of the Jordan Report summarizes 20 payoffs from basic research will continue to invigorate vaccine years of achievements in vaccine research driven by the explo­ development, but economic, risk communication, and safety sive technological advances in genomics, immunology, and challenges are likely to influence the licensing of new vaccines.
    [Show full text]